Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

“Our interventions are often lethal.” Bret Weinstein argues that medical interventions meant to help during outbreaks have often caused more harm than benefit. “But what caused Spanish flu to be so deadly was two things… one was secondary infections with bacterial pneumonia… but the other thing… was doctors giving...

ChildrensHD's profile picture

Children’s Health Defense

325,413 subscribers

20,427 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнесНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Was the golden pager a threat to Donald Trump from Benjamin Netanyahu? Bret Weinstein weighs in: “What am I to make of the fact that you have these exploding pagers used to kill terrorists, obviously, that’s not the only people who were killed, but nonetheless, that was their purpose, and then one is delivered to Trump?”
2:36

Was the golden pager a threat to Donald Trump from Benjamin Netanyahu? Bret Weinstein weighs in: “What am I to make of the fact that you have these exploding pagers used to kill terrorists, obviously, that’s not the only people who were killed, but nonetheless, that was their purpose, and then one is delivered to Trump?”

TCN

618,345 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

“Hundreds of millions of people who already had Covid did not need to take any risk whatsoever from a novel vaccine.” Bret Weinstein is calling out doctors who pushed COVID-19 vaccines and are now reversing course on effectiveness. “All of the major players gathered together and privately understood the very same thing that they were gaslighting us over.” “They understood that natural immunity was the best immunity that you were going to come by and that a vaccine wasn't going to augment it.” “And they decided to keep that to themselves in spite of the fact that these vaccines are built on a novel technology they didn't know the hazards of at best.” “They were not just disagreeing with us.” “They were gaslighting us and telling people like you that people like me were crazy.” Bret Weinstein The DarkHorse Podcast Michael Shermer
4:26

“Hundreds of millions of people who already had Covid did not need to take any risk whatsoever from a novel vaccine.” Bret Weinstein is calling out doctors who pushed COVID-19 vaccines and are now reversing course on effectiveness. “All of the major players gathered together and privately understood the very same thing that they were gaslighting us over.” “They understood that natural immunity was the best immunity that you were going to come by and that a vaccine wasn't going to augment it.” “And they decided to keep that to themselves in spite of the fact that these vaccines are built on a novel technology they didn't know the hazards of at best.” “They were not just disagreeing with us.” “They were gaslighting us and telling people like you that people like me were crazy.” Bret Weinstein The DarkHorse Podcast Michael Shermer

Children’s Health Defense

13,196 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein
2:10

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

695,191 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Bret Weinstein REVEALED to Joe Rogan how Covid vaccine manufacturers can be sued despite the 1986 liability protection: “The immunity from liability is dependent on there having been no fraud—and there clearly was fraud.” “[There was an] insufficient amount of safety testing that was done before these things were released.” “(It) was done with mRNA vaccines produced in a process that did not involve DNA.” “The product that was actually injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids.” “There is massive contamination in the shots that were actually delivered.” “For you to put your… drug through safety testing and then inject people with something different… that were not tested is fraudulent.” Joe Rogan Bret Weinstein
1:52

Bret Weinstein REVEALED to Joe Rogan how Covid vaccine manufacturers can be sued despite the 1986 liability protection: “The immunity from liability is dependent on there having been no fraud—and there clearly was fraud.” “[There was an] insufficient amount of safety testing that was done before these things were released.” “(It) was done with mRNA vaccines produced in a process that did not involve DNA.” “The product that was actually injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids.” “There is massive contamination in the shots that were actually delivered.” “For you to put your… drug through safety testing and then inject people with something different… that were not tested is fraudulent.” Joe Rogan Bret Weinstein

Children’s Health Defense

56,287 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Bret Weinstein told Joe Rogan that the FDA’s memo admitting that at least 10 children died from Covid-19 shots is “the tip of a much larger iceberg.” “Those of us who have circulated in communities of the vaccine-injured know just how many orders of magnitude more we’re really talking about.” “But he says in the letter, the number of kids who were killed by this is actually higher, but these 10 are ones in which it was so unambiguous that their analysis regards it as causal.” Bret Weinstein Joe Rogan
2:43

Bret Weinstein told Joe Rogan that the FDA’s memo admitting that at least 10 children died from Covid-19 shots is “the tip of a much larger iceberg.” “Those of us who have circulated in communities of the vaccine-injured know just how many orders of magnitude more we’re really talking about.” “But he says in the letter, the number of kids who were killed by this is actually higher, but these 10 are ones in which it was so unambiguous that their analysis regards it as causal.” Bret Weinstein Joe Rogan

Children’s Health Defense

10,784 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

What is the "Middle Ground Scramble?" Bret Weinstein explains: "So you get a bunch of people in the middle engaged in a game that I call the "middle ground scramble," where they are now going to scold the fringe. Oh, those people, yes, the pandemic didn't turn out to be what we thought, but those people on the fringe, they actually were crazy. And then they scold the mainstream. Yes, we can all agree that out of an abundance of caution, things were done that in retrospect, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. They scold both sides and they ascend because the vast number of people who wants to acknowledge that something bad happened without empowering the fringe that they demonized will empower these people in the middle. And the problem, the reason I say this is a tragedy, is that the "middle ground scramblers" do not have a track record that tells you that they actually know anything that would allow them to avoid this the next time. So by promoting them, we effectively guarantee that it will happen again.
2:17

What is the "Middle Ground Scramble?" Bret Weinstein explains: "So you get a bunch of people in the middle engaged in a game that I call the "middle ground scramble," where they are now going to scold the fringe. Oh, those people, yes, the pandemic didn't turn out to be what we thought, but those people on the fringe, they actually were crazy. And then they scold the mainstream. Yes, we can all agree that out of an abundance of caution, things were done that in retrospect, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. They scold both sides and they ascend because the vast number of people who wants to acknowledge that something bad happened without empowering the fringe that they demonized will empower these people in the middle. And the problem, the reason I say this is a tragedy, is that the "middle ground scramblers" do not have a track record that tells you that they actually know anything that would allow them to avoid this the next time. So by promoting them, we effectively guarantee that it will happen again.

The Darkhorse Podcast

31,649 просмотров • 1 год назад

“This untested experimental shot was forced on tens of millions of people.” “Against their will.” “And resulted in vast health problems and documented deaths.” “This mass movement is not going anywhere.” Jeffrey Tucker SLAMS Big Pharma for Covid mandates: “Forcing shots on people is a very aggressive thing to do.” “It’s a little bit like conscripting people into a pharmaceutical army.” “If you’re just going to force people to do something against their will that involves their human person, you’re going to provoke a massive backlash.” “Vaccine conscription… contradicts the American spirit.” “So of course, you’ve got a very intense focus on medical freedom now.” “When the Covid shot was happening… they found out that the uptake of these new experimental shots was so low.” “They said, ‘Not a problem, we’re just going to force everybody to do it.’” “And that was, even from the point of view of the pharmaceutical companies, a huge disaster for them long term.” “It gave rise to a mass movement that’s newly aware of the threat that these people represent to our bodily autonomy.” “And ultimately to our health and to our freedoms.” “So it was the pharmaceutical companies, together with the Biden administration, that created this mass movement in the first place.” “We’re going to get our way one way or the other.” “We’re not going anywhere.” Jeffrey A Tucker CHDTV Live
2:20

“This untested experimental shot was forced on tens of millions of people.” “Against their will.” “And resulted in vast health problems and documented deaths.” “This mass movement is not going anywhere.” Jeffrey Tucker SLAMS Big Pharma for Covid mandates: “Forcing shots on people is a very aggressive thing to do.” “It’s a little bit like conscripting people into a pharmaceutical army.” “If you’re just going to force people to do something against their will that involves their human person, you’re going to provoke a massive backlash.” “Vaccine conscription… contradicts the American spirit.” “So of course, you’ve got a very intense focus on medical freedom now.” “When the Covid shot was happening… they found out that the uptake of these new experimental shots was so low.” “They said, ‘Not a problem, we’re just going to force everybody to do it.’” “And that was, even from the point of view of the pharmaceutical companies, a huge disaster for them long term.” “It gave rise to a mass movement that’s newly aware of the threat that these people represent to our bodily autonomy.” “And ultimately to our health and to our freedoms.” “So it was the pharmaceutical companies, together with the Biden administration, that created this mass movement in the first place.” “We’re going to get our way one way or the other.” “We’re not going anywhere.” Jeffrey A Tucker CHDTV Live

Children’s Health Defense

16,001 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Did you know that the death rate from measles declined by 98% BEFORE the measles vaccine was introduced? “This is all on the CDC website… That decline had nothing to do with vaccines.” So, if vaccines didn’t do it, what caused that decline from 1900 to 1963? The answer is better nutrition, better sanitation, clean water, etc., according to Attorney Aaron Siri. He explains, “That declining rate of mortality—it was a trajectory that was ongoing even when the measles vaccine was introduced in ’63. So those 400 [measles] deaths [per year], which have now gone down, how much of that is attributable to the measles vaccine? How much of it is to the continued efforts of public health agencies? “That could be debated forever. We don’t need to. But the important point is… when you listen to public health authorities today, they will say to you, ‘Measles is what caused the decline.’ ‘Measles vaccine is what caused the decline in mortality.’ They never talk about those other things that they did.”
2:40

Did you know that the death rate from measles declined by 98% BEFORE the measles vaccine was introduced? “This is all on the CDC website… That decline had nothing to do with vaccines.” So, if vaccines didn’t do it, what caused that decline from 1900 to 1963? The answer is better nutrition, better sanitation, clean water, etc., according to Attorney Aaron Siri. He explains, “That declining rate of mortality—it was a trajectory that was ongoing even when the measles vaccine was introduced in ’63. So those 400 [measles] deaths [per year], which have now gone down, how much of that is attributable to the measles vaccine? How much of it is to the continued efforts of public health agencies? “That could be debated forever. We don’t need to. But the important point is… when you listen to public health authorities today, they will say to you, ‘Measles is what caused the decline.’ ‘Measles vaccine is what caused the decline in mortality.’ They never talk about those other things that they did.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

627,636 просмотров • 1 год назад

"We need to remind ourselves the next time that we have Americans demonizing other Americans for a belief like this, you have to say, 'Huh, is this going to be one of those things where I'm going to be slandering people? And then five years from now, I'm going to find out I was on the wrong side, that I was in fact buying misinformation from my own government and going after my fellow citizens over it.' This can never happen again." - Bret Weinstein
1:22

"We need to remind ourselves the next time that we have Americans demonizing other Americans for a belief like this, you have to say, 'Huh, is this going to be one of those things where I'm going to be slandering people? And then five years from now, I'm going to find out I was on the wrong side, that I was in fact buying misinformation from my own government and going after my fellow citizens over it.' This can never happen again." - Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

23,882 просмотров • 1 год назад

Doctors and hospitals murdered Covid-19 patients at the orders of Dr Anthony Fauci. 😡 "In 2018, Remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a 53% kill rate, published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a 53% kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May of 2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. This drug was too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing 53% of the people that it was given to. We had Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burke sitting next to the President going, "we need to use Remdesivir", despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use it. The problem is, as long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the eugenics office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953. That same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about eugenics, but I have a problem with it."
1:18

Doctors and hospitals murdered Covid-19 patients at the orders of Dr Anthony Fauci. 😡 "In 2018, Remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a 53% kill rate, published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a 53% kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May of 2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. This drug was too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing 53% of the people that it was given to. We had Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burke sitting next to the President going, "we need to use Remdesivir", despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use it. The problem is, as long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the eugenics office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953. That same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about eugenics, but I have a problem with it."

Bridgett Fertig

55,499 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Jaques Vallee describes his out of body experience and the being he encountered. he says he’s worked with an inventor in electrical tech that’s gone out of body numerous ways and that also friends within the Bigelow team had trouble getting back into their bodies during OBE’s Source -Engaging the Phenomenon 🔗 in comments JV -“I was taken out of my body, which II've never done, and instantly moved to the area where I was in the presence of this entity. And then my reaction was fear, terror, terror of being outside my body. Not so much terror of the entity. The entity itself wasn't terribly scary. I only perceived it for, certainly less than a minute. And then I was, I think my reaction was such that I was precipitated back into my body and I woke up shaking, crying, just completely, you know, reacting to it in fear, but more in fear that, you know, when people try to, and I've worked with a number of people who have gone out of their body, including some names in American electronic science that you would recognize, including a really great inventor of the technology we're using now, who went out of his body a number of ways and in fact, but always under, in, in relatively continuous conditions, not, not abrupt conditions. The way, the way it happened to me. So I was familiar with their experiences, the. I have no doubt about the reality of, of, of what happens. we don't exactly learn the conditions, as you may know, there are a number of books and people who actually teach how to do that. It's, it's dangerous because some people have described great difficulty in getting back into their body once they were floating around, including some of our friends within the Bigelow team. So those really need to be very structured in control. It's best to do it with someone else guiding you or being aware of, what happens to you. And for one thing, you know, making sure that during the experience, your body is safe. This was very abrupt. I'm not sure I want to do it again, but the, the nature of the entity is something that I continue to study and try to recall because it's relevant to what other people have said. So I want to use that as my guide into understanding what witnesses tell me and what at some point, you know, that, I mean, if, if you are a doctor, there are some experiments you have to do on your own body, you know, be before you can really understand what, what your patients are going through. as you know, I'm, I'm pretty tall. I'm over six foot tall. It was tall as I was, it was darker. This was obviously at, at night. It had, its back to a window, a a window that, you know, was looking at San Francisco at night, but the, essentially the outside was, was dark with some city lights. “I didn't get any structural details, you know, other than the, this was conscious and it had a sense of, you know, occupying the space for a, a reason. I mean, this was not just a, you know, like a piece of furniture”
6:03

Jaques Vallee describes his out of body experience and the being he encountered. he says he’s worked with an inventor in electrical tech that’s gone out of body numerous ways and that also friends within the Bigelow team had trouble getting back into their bodies during OBE’s Source -Engaging the Phenomenon 🔗 in comments JV -“I was taken out of my body, which II've never done, and instantly moved to the area where I was in the presence of this entity. And then my reaction was fear, terror, terror of being outside my body. Not so much terror of the entity. The entity itself wasn't terribly scary. I only perceived it for, certainly less than a minute. And then I was, I think my reaction was such that I was precipitated back into my body and I woke up shaking, crying, just completely, you know, reacting to it in fear, but more in fear that, you know, when people try to, and I've worked with a number of people who have gone out of their body, including some names in American electronic science that you would recognize, including a really great inventor of the technology we're using now, who went out of his body a number of ways and in fact, but always under, in, in relatively continuous conditions, not, not abrupt conditions. The way, the way it happened to me. So I was familiar with their experiences, the. I have no doubt about the reality of, of, of what happens. we don't exactly learn the conditions, as you may know, there are a number of books and people who actually teach how to do that. It's, it's dangerous because some people have described great difficulty in getting back into their body once they were floating around, including some of our friends within the Bigelow team. So those really need to be very structured in control. It's best to do it with someone else guiding you or being aware of, what happens to you. And for one thing, you know, making sure that during the experience, your body is safe. This was very abrupt. I'm not sure I want to do it again, but the, the nature of the entity is something that I continue to study and try to recall because it's relevant to what other people have said. So I want to use that as my guide into understanding what witnesses tell me and what at some point, you know, that, I mean, if, if you are a doctor, there are some experiments you have to do on your own body, you know, be before you can really understand what, what your patients are going through. as you know, I'm, I'm pretty tall. I'm over six foot tall. It was tall as I was, it was darker. This was obviously at, at night. It had, its back to a window, a a window that, you know, was looking at San Francisco at night, but the, essentially the outside was, was dark with some city lights. “I didn't get any structural details, you know, other than the, this was conscious and it had a sense of, you know, occupying the space for a, a reason. I mean, this was not just a, you know, like a piece of furniture”

neandrewthal

41,051 просмотров • 1 год назад

RFK Jr. breaks down the numbers behind the rotavirus vaccine. “In this country, the death rate from rotavirus prior to the introduction of the vaccine was about three kids a year.” “Since the introduction of the vaccine, one of the studies shows that it’s dropped to two deaths a year.” “That means you’re giving three million vaccines a year to kids and you’re saving one life.” “If any of those vaccines are causing a death, that completely cancels any benefit out of all of those vaccines.” “The first rotavirus vaccine they approved caused intussusception at such high rates it was clearly much worse than the disease.” “Even the idea that we needed it in this country was kind of crazy.” “The European countries don’t require it.”
1:42

RFK Jr. breaks down the numbers behind the rotavirus vaccine. “In this country, the death rate from rotavirus prior to the introduction of the vaccine was about three kids a year.” “Since the introduction of the vaccine, one of the studies shows that it’s dropped to two deaths a year.” “That means you’re giving three million vaccines a year to kids and you’re saving one life.” “If any of those vaccines are causing a death, that completely cancels any benefit out of all of those vaccines.” “The first rotavirus vaccine they approved caused intussusception at such high rates it was clearly much worse than the disease.” “Even the idea that we needed it in this country was kind of crazy.” “The European countries don’t require it.”

MAHA Action

105,786 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

In the past week Clint Russell asked Bret Weinstein how he would grade Trump, now that Bret voted for him for the first time in the 2024 election. Here is Bret's response: "I am confused by what I see... I am completely comfortable with having voted for Trump. It was my first time because of the apocalypse that was represented by the blue ticket. And so I just don't think there was any rational choice. We had an absolute emergency on our hands and this simple ability to vote for something that was in some way authentic made it the only game in town. Now, as for what is transpiring under the Trump administration, I am aware that there is a labyrinth of power and a hidden priority list. The administration presumably has things it wants to accomplish. The labyrinth of power sets the ground rules as to what can be accomplished at what rate and in exchange for what, I know I'm not privy to that. And so the real question is how does the stack up compared to what was possible given the cards that president Trump held on inauguration? And I don't think any of us are in a position to answer that. So, you know, is the disappointment the result of the fact that the constraints on the president are greater than we hoped and maybe imagined? Are they the result of the priorities not being the represented priorities? Undoubtedly that plays some role. But, you know, again, in light of what was, you know, we had President Biden was not the president in the meaningful sense. To have attempted to run him again. And then at the point that that became implausible, to swap in an empty shirt is such a dire commentary on the state of the Republic that I think every conversation about how the Trump administration is doing has to begin with the fact that there was no alternative."
2:53

In the past week Clint Russell asked Bret Weinstein how he would grade Trump, now that Bret voted for him for the first time in the 2024 election. Here is Bret's response: "I am confused by what I see... I am completely comfortable with having voted for Trump. It was my first time because of the apocalypse that was represented by the blue ticket. And so I just don't think there was any rational choice. We had an absolute emergency on our hands and this simple ability to vote for something that was in some way authentic made it the only game in town. Now, as for what is transpiring under the Trump administration, I am aware that there is a labyrinth of power and a hidden priority list. The administration presumably has things it wants to accomplish. The labyrinth of power sets the ground rules as to what can be accomplished at what rate and in exchange for what, I know I'm not privy to that. And so the real question is how does the stack up compared to what was possible given the cards that president Trump held on inauguration? And I don't think any of us are in a position to answer that. So, you know, is the disappointment the result of the fact that the constraints on the president are greater than we hoped and maybe imagined? Are they the result of the priorities not being the represented priorities? Undoubtedly that plays some role. But, you know, again, in light of what was, you know, we had President Biden was not the president in the meaningful sense. To have attempted to run him again. And then at the point that that became implausible, to swap in an empty shirt is such a dire commentary on the state of the Republic that I think every conversation about how the Trump administration is doing has to begin with the fact that there was no alternative."

The Darkhorse Podcast

46,443 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

"It could not have been COVID vaccines, though, of course, they're harmful in their own right. And they didn't stop COVID, nor infection, nor transmission, and most likely caused a lot of other harms to people's health. But the April 2020 excess death was not caused by those vaccines because they had not yet been rolled out. It could also not have been caused by COVID because on a macro analysis, using all the data, doing a statistical analysis, mathematically. They could not have been caused by COVID because COVID cases simply do not correlate to the April 2020 excess death spikes. The only thing that correlates is the use of Midazolam injections. When you combine that with a known fact that the infection fatality rate for those that were told that they had COVID was similar to the flu, there's no way, even if it had been COVID, that it should have caused that huge excess death spike in April 2020. What you should have seen is flu-like death patterns, not a huge spike like those graphs represent." Maajid Nawaz, WARRIOR CREED
0:58

"It could not have been COVID vaccines, though, of course, they're harmful in their own right. And they didn't stop COVID, nor infection, nor transmission, and most likely caused a lot of other harms to people's health. But the April 2020 excess death was not caused by those vaccines because they had not yet been rolled out. It could also not have been caused by COVID because on a macro analysis, using all the data, doing a statistical analysis, mathematically. They could not have been caused by COVID because COVID cases simply do not correlate to the April 2020 excess death spikes. The only thing that correlates is the use of Midazolam injections. When you combine that with a known fact that the infection fatality rate for those that were told that they had COVID was similar to the flu, there's no way, even if it had been COVID, that it should have caused that huge excess death spike in April 2020. What you should have seen is flu-like death patterns, not a huge spike like those graphs represent." Maajid Nawaz, WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

112,790 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад