Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

“Our interventions are often lethal.” Bret Weinstein argues that medical interventions meant to help during outbreaks have often caused more harm than benefit. “But what caused Spanish flu to be so deadly was two things… one was secondary infections with bacterial pneumonia… but the other thing… was doctors giving... doses of aspirin.” “We gave people aspirin in such doses that they effectively drowned in their own lymph.” “What happened during Covid was doctors were led to believe in advance that it was this incredibly deadly disease… and so the interventions of those doctors — things like ventilators and remdesivir — actually killed a huge number of people.” “That then created the impression that there was this large wave of death that justified extreme measures like lockdowns, masks, and a mass vaccine campaign.” “The point is you need to know what the likelihood is… that not only are you going to have some significant impact on reducing the number of deaths, but you’re not going to cause a much larger harm of some other kind that you’re not bothering to measure.” Bret Weinsteinshow more

Children’s Health Defense

325,413 subscribers

20,427 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & Wellness Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Was the golden pager a threat to Donald Trump from Benjamin Netanyahu? Bret Weinstein weighs in: “What am I to make of the fact that you have these exploding pagers used to kill terrorists, obviously, that’s not the only people who were killed, but nonetheless, that was their purpose, and then one is delivered to Trump?”

Was the golden pager a threat to Donald Trump from Benjamin Netanyahu? Bret Weinstein weighs in: “What am I to make of the fact that you have these exploding pagers used to kill terrorists, obviously, that’s not the only people who were killed, but nonetheless, that was their purpose, and then one is delivered to Trump?”

TCN

619,115 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

“Hundreds of millions of people who already had Covid did not need to take any risk whatsoever from a novel vaccine.” Bret Weinstein is calling out doctors who pushed COVID-19 vaccines and are now reversing course on effectiveness. “All of the major players gathered together and privately understood the very same thing that they were gaslighting us over.” “They understood that natural immunity was the best immunity that you were going to come by and that a vaccine wasn't going to augment it.” “And they decided to keep that to themselves in spite of the fact that these vaccines are built on a novel technology they didn't know the hazards of at best.” “They were not just disagreeing with us.” “They were gaslighting us and telling people like you that people like me were crazy.” Bret Weinstein The DarkHorse Podcast Michael Shermer

“Hundreds of millions of people who already had Covid did not need to take any risk whatsoever from a novel vaccine.” Bret Weinstein is calling out doctors who pushed COVID-19 vaccines and are now reversing course on effectiveness. “All of the major players gathered together and privately understood the very same thing that they were gaslighting us over.” “They understood that natural immunity was the best immunity that you were going to come by and that a vaccine wasn't going to augment it.” “And they decided to keep that to themselves in spite of the fact that these vaccines are built on a novel technology they didn't know the hazards of at best.” “They were not just disagreeing with us.” “They were gaslighting us and telling people like you that people like me were crazy.” Bret Weinstein The DarkHorse Podcast Michael Shermer

Children’s Health Defense

13,238 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

It’s time to prosecute Anthony Fauci Bret Weinstein confirms on Tucker Carlson that 17 million people were killed from the Covid mRNA vaccine Anthony Fauci funded the creation of the virus that killed all these people “There was a press I was recently at a conference in Romania on the COVID crisis, and so there was a lot of work trying to unpack what we actually understand. And I saw a credible estimate of something, like 17,000,000 deaths globally from this technology. So 17,000,000 deaths from the COVID vaxx? Well when you scale up to billions it's not hard to reach a number like that with a technology this dangerous” World War 1 was estimated to cause about 15 million deaths on the low end so the covid vaccine could have literally killed more power than a World War Yet we can’t lock up the guy who funded it??

It’s time to prosecute Anthony Fauci Bret Weinstein confirms on Tucker Carlson that 17 million people were killed from the Covid mRNA vaccine Anthony Fauci funded the creation of the virus that killed all these people “There was a press I was recently at a conference in Romania on the COVID crisis, and so there was a lot of work trying to unpack what we actually understand. And I saw a credible estimate of something, like 17,000,000 deaths globally from this technology. So 17,000,000 deaths from the COVID vaxx? Well when you scale up to billions it's not hard to reach a number like that with a technology this dangerous” World War 1 was estimated to cause about 15 million deaths on the low end so the covid vaccine could have literally killed more power than a World War Yet we can’t lock up the guy who funded it??

Wall Street Apes

32,397 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

696,435 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Bret Weinstein REVEALED to Joe Rogan how Covid vaccine manufacturers can be sued despite the 1986 liability protection: “The immunity from liability is dependent on there having been no fraud—and there clearly was fraud.” “[There was an] insufficient amount of safety testing that was done before these things were released.” “(It) was done with mRNA vaccines produced in a process that did not involve DNA.” “The product that was actually injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids.” “There is massive contamination in the shots that were actually delivered.” “For you to put your… drug through safety testing and then inject people with something different… that were not tested is fraudulent.” Joe Rogan Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein REVEALED to Joe Rogan how Covid vaccine manufacturers can be sued despite the 1986 liability protection: “The immunity from liability is dependent on there having been no fraud—and there clearly was fraud.” “[There was an] insufficient amount of safety testing that was done before these things were released.” “(It) was done with mRNA vaccines produced in a process that did not involve DNA.” “The product that was actually injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids.” “There is massive contamination in the shots that were actually delivered.” “For you to put your… drug through safety testing and then inject people with something different… that were not tested is fraudulent.” Joe Rogan Bret Weinstein

Children’s Health Defense

56,287 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Bret Weinstein told Joe Rogan that the FDA’s memo admitting that at least 10 children died from Covid-19 shots is “the tip of a much larger iceberg.” “Those of us who have circulated in communities of the vaccine-injured know just how many orders of magnitude more we’re really talking about.” “But he says in the letter, the number of kids who were killed by this is actually higher, but these 10 are ones in which it was so unambiguous that their analysis regards it as causal.” Bret Weinstein Joe Rogan

Bret Weinstein told Joe Rogan that the FDA’s memo admitting that at least 10 children died from Covid-19 shots is “the tip of a much larger iceberg.” “Those of us who have circulated in communities of the vaccine-injured know just how many orders of magnitude more we’re really talking about.” “But he says in the letter, the number of kids who were killed by this is actually higher, but these 10 are ones in which it was so unambiguous that their analysis regards it as causal.” Bret Weinstein Joe Rogan

Children’s Health Defense

10,793 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

What is the "Middle Ground Scramble?" Bret Weinstein explains: "So you get a bunch of people in the middle engaged in a game that I call the "middle ground scramble," where they are now going to scold the fringe. Oh, those people, yes, the pandemic didn't turn out to be what we thought, but those people on the fringe, they actually were crazy. And then they scold the mainstream. Yes, we can all agree that out of an abundance of caution, things were done that in retrospect, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. They scold both sides and they ascend because the vast number of people who wants to acknowledge that something bad happened without empowering the fringe that they demonized will empower these people in the middle. And the problem, the reason I say this is a tragedy, is that the "middle ground scramblers" do not have a track record that tells you that they actually know anything that would allow them to avoid this the next time. So by promoting them, we effectively guarantee that it will happen again.

What is the "Middle Ground Scramble?" Bret Weinstein explains: "So you get a bunch of people in the middle engaged in a game that I call the "middle ground scramble," where they are now going to scold the fringe. Oh, those people, yes, the pandemic didn't turn out to be what we thought, but those people on the fringe, they actually were crazy. And then they scold the mainstream. Yes, we can all agree that out of an abundance of caution, things were done that in retrospect, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. They scold both sides and they ascend because the vast number of people who wants to acknowledge that something bad happened without empowering the fringe that they demonized will empower these people in the middle. And the problem, the reason I say this is a tragedy, is that the "middle ground scramblers" do not have a track record that tells you that they actually know anything that would allow them to avoid this the next time. So by promoting them, we effectively guarantee that it will happen again.

The Darkhorse Podcast

31,649 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.DHH credits Marc Andreessen Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with helping him the most during the darkest time of his professional life: "It was during that rough going where Andreessen came in. We were a small company of 60 people and 20 took the offer and left. That's almost a third of the company that decided to leave and we got to a point where we were thinking that not many more have to leave before we need to worry about whether we can keep the lights on. And it was actually Tobi who then put me in contact with Marc Andreessen because Marc had been exposed to this phenomenon at some of his portfolio companies. And Marc gave us reassurance and a bunch of contacts. Marc said, "Do you need someone to come in to help do programming or help with operations or whatever?" And I was floored by the generosity because Marc and I haven't always seen eye to eye on things. Especially in terms of venture capital. He's been one of the main faces of venture capital for decades and I've been kind of critical at times. And it was just a realization that all those grievances we might have thought to be so big once upon a time were actually minuscule. We were fighting the white walkers on the other side of the wall and all our internal squabbles were going to be for nothing if those f*ckers got inside the wall and destroyed everything. And that felt like a real threat at the time. That could've happened. They could very well have just ripped the whole thing apart. And Marc clearly saw that that this was a collective, almost existential threat to the entire industry. If these activists were able to take over these institutions in the same way that they have taken over academia we would be f*cked and not just for a little while but potentially for decades. That couldn't stand. And Marc was incredibly helpful not just in terms of these contacts and introductions and so on but it was very powerful. When you have literally 40,000 people on Twitter calling you all the worst things in the world even the strongest individual might go for a second like "Holy sh*t. The mob is coming for me and there's no one else there." And there are other people there. Tobi was there. Marc was there. And it was incredibly helpful to give us the fortitude to go like "No do you know what? We're going to stick with it. We're not going to grovel. We're not going to apologize. We're not going to revert." And then what Marc also did was he gave me a syllabus for understanding the history of wokeness going all the way back to the '60s and beyond. That this didn't just come as lightning from a blue sky. This had an institutional grounding that was set in motion particularly in the '60s and the long march through the institutions, Herbert Marcuse and a lot of The Frankfurt School and all of these groups that had designs on how to reshape society and create the revolution they so dearly wanted, but with a timeline and a roadmap that was demarcated in decades. That it wasn't just like "Well we're going to put something together and then in two years something's going to happen." No they were sitting in the fucking '60s fantasizing about how to overthrow everything in the 2000s. It's actually incredible in a Dr. Evil sense of it but when you're on the receiving end of it it seemed a little less incredible and it was just difficult not knowing where's this coming from? Why is this happening all of a sudden? Well it wasn't happening all of a sudden. There was this long history of it and when you understood that history it made a lot more sense. We weren't just making a rejection for our little corner of the world. We were chipping in in the great civilizational battle of where this country was going to go, whether the white walkers beyond the wall were going to win. And we were like "No they're not going to f*cking win. Get them out of that f*cking wall. Take your goddamn spear and fire it with maximum velocity."

.DHH credits Marc Andreessen Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with helping him the most during the darkest time of his professional life: "It was during that rough going where Andreessen came in. We were a small company of 60 people and 20 took the offer and left. That's almost a third of the company that decided to leave and we got to a point where we were thinking that not many more have to leave before we need to worry about whether we can keep the lights on. And it was actually Tobi who then put me in contact with Marc Andreessen because Marc had been exposed to this phenomenon at some of his portfolio companies. And Marc gave us reassurance and a bunch of contacts. Marc said, "Do you need someone to come in to help do programming or help with operations or whatever?" And I was floored by the generosity because Marc and I haven't always seen eye to eye on things. Especially in terms of venture capital. He's been one of the main faces of venture capital for decades and I've been kind of critical at times. And it was just a realization that all those grievances we might have thought to be so big once upon a time were actually minuscule. We were fighting the white walkers on the other side of the wall and all our internal squabbles were going to be for nothing if those fckers got inside the wall and destroyed everything. And that felt like a real threat at the time. That could've happened. They could very well have just ripped the whole thing apart. And Marc clearly saw that that this was a collective, almost existential threat to the entire industry. If these activists were able to take over these institutions in the same way that they have taken over academia we would be fcked and not just for a little while but potentially for decades. That couldn't stand. And Marc was incredibly helpful not just in terms of these contacts and introductions and so on but it was very powerful. When you have literally 40,000 people on Twitter calling you all the worst things in the world even the strongest individual might go for a second like "Holy sht. The mob is coming for me and there's no one else there." And there are other people there. Tobi was there. Marc was there. And it was incredibly helpful to give us the fortitude to go like "No do you know what? We're going to stick with it. We're not going to grovel. We're not going to apologize. We're not going to revert." And then what Marc also did was he gave me a syllabus for understanding the history of wokeness going all the way back to the '60s and beyond. That this didn't just come as lightning from a blue sky. This had an institutional grounding that was set in motion particularly in the '60s and the long march through the institutions, Herbert Marcuse and a lot of The Frankfurt School and all of these groups that had designs on how to reshape society and create the revolution they so dearly wanted, but with a timeline and a roadmap that was demarcated in decades. That it wasn't just like "Well we're going to put something together and then in two years something's going to happen." No they were sitting in the fucking '60s fantasizing about how to overthrow everything in the 2000s. It's actually incredible in a Dr. Evil sense of it but when you're on the receiving end of it it seemed a little less incredible and it was just difficult not knowing where's this coming from? Why is this happening all of a sudden? Well it wasn't happening all of a sudden. There was this long history of it and when you understood that history it made a lot more sense. We weren't just making a rejection for our little corner of the world. We were chipping in in the great civilizational battle of where this country was going to go, whether the white walkers beyond the wall were going to win. And we were like "No they're not going to fcking win. Get them out of that f*cking wall. Take your goddamn spear and fire it with maximum velocity."

David Senra

521,677 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

“This untested experimental shot was forced on tens of millions of people.” “Against their will.” “And resulted in vast health problems and documented deaths.” “This mass movement is not going anywhere.” Jeffrey Tucker SLAMS Big Pharma for Covid mandates: “Forcing shots on people is a very aggressive thing to do.” “It’s a little bit like conscripting people into a pharmaceutical army.” “If you’re just going to force people to do something against their will that involves their human person, you’re going to provoke a massive backlash.” “Vaccine conscription… contradicts the American spirit.” “So of course, you’ve got a very intense focus on medical freedom now.” “When the Covid shot was happening… they found out that the uptake of these new experimental shots was so low.” “They said, ‘Not a problem, we’re just going to force everybody to do it.’” “And that was, even from the point of view of the pharmaceutical companies, a huge disaster for them long term.” “It gave rise to a mass movement that’s newly aware of the threat that these people represent to our bodily autonomy.” “And ultimately to our health and to our freedoms.” “So it was the pharmaceutical companies, together with the Biden administration, that created this mass movement in the first place.” “We’re going to get our way one way or the other.” “We’re not going anywhere.” Jeffrey A Tucker CHDTV Live

“This untested experimental shot was forced on tens of millions of people.” “Against their will.” “And resulted in vast health problems and documented deaths.” “This mass movement is not going anywhere.” Jeffrey Tucker SLAMS Big Pharma for Covid mandates: “Forcing shots on people is a very aggressive thing to do.” “It’s a little bit like conscripting people into a pharmaceutical army.” “If you’re just going to force people to do something against their will that involves their human person, you’re going to provoke a massive backlash.” “Vaccine conscription… contradicts the American spirit.” “So of course, you’ve got a very intense focus on medical freedom now.” “When the Covid shot was happening… they found out that the uptake of these new experimental shots was so low.” “They said, ‘Not a problem, we’re just going to force everybody to do it.’” “And that was, even from the point of view of the pharmaceutical companies, a huge disaster for them long term.” “It gave rise to a mass movement that’s newly aware of the threat that these people represent to our bodily autonomy.” “And ultimately to our health and to our freedoms.” “So it was the pharmaceutical companies, together with the Biden administration, that created this mass movement in the first place.” “We’re going to get our way one way or the other.” “We’re not going anywhere.” Jeffrey A Tucker CHDTV Live

Children’s Health Defense

16,121 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Did you know that the death rate from measles declined by 98% BEFORE the measles vaccine was introduced? “This is all on the CDC website… That decline had nothing to do with vaccines.” So, if vaccines didn’t do it, what caused that decline from 1900 to 1963? The answer is better nutrition, better sanitation, clean water, etc., according to Attorney Aaron Siri. He explains, “That declining rate of mortality—it was a trajectory that was ongoing even when the measles vaccine was introduced in ’63. So those 400 [measles] deaths [per year], which have now gone down, how much of that is attributable to the measles vaccine? How much of it is to the continued efforts of public health agencies? “That could be debated forever. We don’t need to. But the important point is… when you listen to public health authorities today, they will say to you, ‘Measles is what caused the decline.’ ‘Measles vaccine is what caused the decline in mortality.’ They never talk about those other things that they did.”

Did you know that the death rate from measles declined by 98% BEFORE the measles vaccine was introduced? “This is all on the CDC website… That decline had nothing to do with vaccines.” So, if vaccines didn’t do it, what caused that decline from 1900 to 1963? The answer is better nutrition, better sanitation, clean water, etc., according to Attorney Aaron Siri. He explains, “That declining rate of mortality—it was a trajectory that was ongoing even when the measles vaccine was introduced in ’63. So those 400 [measles] deaths [per year], which have now gone down, how much of that is attributable to the measles vaccine? How much of it is to the continued efforts of public health agencies? “That could be debated forever. We don’t need to. But the important point is… when you listen to public health authorities today, they will say to you, ‘Measles is what caused the decline.’ ‘Measles vaccine is what caused the decline in mortality.’ They never talk about those other things that they did.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

627,673 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"We need to remind ourselves the next time that we have Americans demonizing other Americans for a belief like this, you have to say, 'Huh, is this going to be one of those things where I'm going to be slandering people? And then five years from now, I'm going to find out I was on the wrong side, that I was in fact buying misinformation from my own government and going after my fellow citizens over it.' This can never happen again." - Bret Weinstein

"We need to remind ourselves the next time that we have Americans demonizing other Americans for a belief like this, you have to say, 'Huh, is this going to be one of those things where I'm going to be slandering people? And then five years from now, I'm going to find out I was on the wrong side, that I was in fact buying misinformation from my own government and going after my fellow citizens over it.' This can never happen again." - Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

23,882 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jaques Vallee describes his out of body experience and the being he encountered. he says he’s worked with an inventor in electrical tech that’s gone out of body numerous ways and that also friends within the Bigelow team had trouble getting back into their bodies during OBE’s Source -Engaging the Phenomenon 🔗 in comments JV -“I was taken out of my body, which II've never done, and instantly moved to the area where I was in the presence of this entity. And then my reaction was fear, terror, terror of being outside my body. Not so much terror of the entity. The entity itself wasn't terribly scary. I only perceived it for, certainly less than a minute. And then I was, I think my reaction was such that I was precipitated back into my body and I woke up shaking, crying, just completely, you know, reacting to it in fear, but more in fear that, you know, when people try to, and I've worked with a number of people who have gone out of their body, including some names in American electronic science that you would recognize, including a really great inventor of the technology we're using now, who went out of his body a number of ways and in fact, but always under, in, in relatively continuous conditions, not, not abrupt conditions. The way, the way it happened to me. So I was familiar with their experiences, the. I have no doubt about the reality of, of, of what happens. we don't exactly learn the conditions, as you may know, there are a number of books and people who actually teach how to do that. It's, it's dangerous because some people have described great difficulty in getting back into their body once they were floating around, including some of our friends within the Bigelow team. So those really need to be very structured in control. It's best to do it with someone else guiding you or being aware of, what happens to you. And for one thing, you know, making sure that during the experience, your body is safe. This was very abrupt. I'm not sure I want to do it again, but the, the nature of the entity is something that I continue to study and try to recall because it's relevant to what other people have said. So I want to use that as my guide into understanding what witnesses tell me and what at some point, you know, that, I mean, if, if you are a doctor, there are some experiments you have to do on your own body, you know, be before you can really understand what, what your patients are going through. as you know, I'm, I'm pretty tall. I'm over six foot tall. It was tall as I was, it was darker. This was obviously at, at night. It had, its back to a window, a a window that, you know, was looking at San Francisco at night, but the, essentially the outside was, was dark with some city lights. “I didn't get any structural details, you know, other than the, this was conscious and it had a sense of, you know, occupying the space for a, a reason. I mean, this was not just a, you know, like a piece of furniture”

Jaques Vallee describes his out of body experience and the being he encountered. he says he’s worked with an inventor in electrical tech that’s gone out of body numerous ways and that also friends within the Bigelow team had trouble getting back into their bodies during OBE’s Source -Engaging the Phenomenon 🔗 in comments JV -“I was taken out of my body, which II've never done, and instantly moved to the area where I was in the presence of this entity. And then my reaction was fear, terror, terror of being outside my body. Not so much terror of the entity. The entity itself wasn't terribly scary. I only perceived it for, certainly less than a minute. And then I was, I think my reaction was such that I was precipitated back into my body and I woke up shaking, crying, just completely, you know, reacting to it in fear, but more in fear that, you know, when people try to, and I've worked with a number of people who have gone out of their body, including some names in American electronic science that you would recognize, including a really great inventor of the technology we're using now, who went out of his body a number of ways and in fact, but always under, in, in relatively continuous conditions, not, not abrupt conditions. The way, the way it happened to me. So I was familiar with their experiences, the. I have no doubt about the reality of, of, of what happens. we don't exactly learn the conditions, as you may know, there are a number of books and people who actually teach how to do that. It's, it's dangerous because some people have described great difficulty in getting back into their body once they were floating around, including some of our friends within the Bigelow team. So those really need to be very structured in control. It's best to do it with someone else guiding you or being aware of, what happens to you. And for one thing, you know, making sure that during the experience, your body is safe. This was very abrupt. I'm not sure I want to do it again, but the, the nature of the entity is something that I continue to study and try to recall because it's relevant to what other people have said. So I want to use that as my guide into understanding what witnesses tell me and what at some point, you know, that, I mean, if, if you are a doctor, there are some experiments you have to do on your own body, you know, be before you can really understand what, what your patients are going through. as you know, I'm, I'm pretty tall. I'm over six foot tall. It was tall as I was, it was darker. This was obviously at, at night. It had, its back to a window, a a window that, you know, was looking at San Francisco at night, but the, essentially the outside was, was dark with some city lights. “I didn't get any structural details, you know, other than the, this was conscious and it had a sense of, you know, occupying the space for a, a reason. I mean, this was not just a, you know, like a piece of furniture”

neandrewthal

41,051 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In the past week Clint Russell asked Bret Weinstein how he would grade Trump, now that Bret voted for him for the first time in the 2024 election. Here is Bret's response: "I am confused by what I see... I am completely comfortable with having voted for Trump. It was my first time because of the apocalypse that was represented by the blue ticket. And so I just don't think there was any rational choice. We had an absolute emergency on our hands and this simple ability to vote for something that was in some way authentic made it the only game in town. Now, as for what is transpiring under the Trump administration, I am aware that there is a labyrinth of power and a hidden priority list. The administration presumably has things it wants to accomplish. The labyrinth of power sets the ground rules as to what can be accomplished at what rate and in exchange for what, I know I'm not privy to that. And so the real question is how does the stack up compared to what was possible given the cards that president Trump held on inauguration? And I don't think any of us are in a position to answer that. So, you know, is the disappointment the result of the fact that the constraints on the president are greater than we hoped and maybe imagined? Are they the result of the priorities not being the represented priorities? Undoubtedly that plays some role. But, you know, again, in light of what was, you know, we had President Biden was not the president in the meaningful sense. To have attempted to run him again. And then at the point that that became implausible, to swap in an empty shirt is such a dire commentary on the state of the Republic that I think every conversation about how the Trump administration is doing has to begin with the fact that there was no alternative."

In the past week Clint Russell asked Bret Weinstein how he would grade Trump, now that Bret voted for him for the first time in the 2024 election. Here is Bret's response: "I am confused by what I see... I am completely comfortable with having voted for Trump. It was my first time because of the apocalypse that was represented by the blue ticket. And so I just don't think there was any rational choice. We had an absolute emergency on our hands and this simple ability to vote for something that was in some way authentic made it the only game in town. Now, as for what is transpiring under the Trump administration, I am aware that there is a labyrinth of power and a hidden priority list. The administration presumably has things it wants to accomplish. The labyrinth of power sets the ground rules as to what can be accomplished at what rate and in exchange for what, I know I'm not privy to that. And so the real question is how does the stack up compared to what was possible given the cards that president Trump held on inauguration? And I don't think any of us are in a position to answer that. So, you know, is the disappointment the result of the fact that the constraints on the president are greater than we hoped and maybe imagined? Are they the result of the priorities not being the represented priorities? Undoubtedly that plays some role. But, you know, again, in light of what was, you know, we had President Biden was not the president in the meaningful sense. To have attempted to run him again. And then at the point that that became implausible, to swap in an empty shirt is such a dire commentary on the state of the Republic that I think every conversation about how the Trump administration is doing has to begin with the fact that there was no alternative."

The Darkhorse Podcast

46,443 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Doctors and hospitals murdered Covid-19 patients at the orders of Dr Anthony Fauci. 😡 "In 2018, Remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a 53% kill rate, published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a 53% kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May of 2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. This drug was too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing 53% of the people that it was given to. We had Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burke sitting next to the President going, "we need to use Remdesivir", despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use it. The problem is, as long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the eugenics office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953. That same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about eugenics, but I have a problem with it."

Doctors and hospitals murdered Covid-19 patients at the orders of Dr Anthony Fauci. 😡 "In 2018, Remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a 53% kill rate, published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a 53% kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May of 2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. This drug was too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing 53% of the people that it was given to. We had Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burke sitting next to the President going, "we need to use Remdesivir", despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use it. The problem is, as long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the eugenics office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953. That same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about eugenics, but I have a problem with it."

Bridgett Fertig

56,044 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten