Our new 20:40:40 fighting system combines more expensive armoured capabilities with cheaper, replaceable systems, and high-volume firepower. This approach makes us more lethal, harder to overwhelm, and much more difficult to defeat.

“If we get this right” is where you’ve gone wrong. The DIP will not give the forces what they need, and our generals will just keep quiet and say nothing.

it doesnt though does it

Boots on the ground, hold ground, engage and defeat the enemy…technology supports the plan it does not replace it.

@FennellJW The most expensive A vehicles in the world! That don’t work and cause disability/disabled operators and have no drone protection- Yesterday’s technology tomorrow - is this clarity of thought, doctrine & strategy?

@DefenceHQ 🤣🤣🤣

We’ve always known that when we are sent to fight it’s always with the cheapest chad piece of kit available. Our politicians & paymasters know the cost of everything & the value of nothing.

20 people in tbe RAF. 40 in the army and navy

RIP 2026

You lot have lost the plot . Shit weapons don’t win wars

Very good. Glad defence is back on the menu.

#Yes ‼️ Go On, Lads 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Wye ey Muns 🇬🇧 🫡 🇬🇧

Bollox

All needed years ago. Also, while Drones and OWE are cheap force multipliers, 20 40 40 is also a nice "excuse" to not buy more conventional kit.

This is the way

Can’t stop an inflatable boat tho