Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Over 6,000 Non-Citizens Registered to Vote in NJ Due to Software Error — Yet Gov. Sherrill Blames Trump A major election integrity issue in New Jersey: More than 6,000 non-citizens were automatically added to voter rolls because of a DMV software glitch, with around 400 illegally casting ballots since...

10,740 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

TRUMP JUST ENDED THE U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Is Trump finally ending mail-in voter fraud? He fired the three remaining commissioners this week, leaving the board with zero members. The EAC is the obscure little agency that sets voting machine standards and controls the federal mail voter registration form. Here is the real story behind it. For over a year Trump has pushed two basic reforms through that commission: proof of citizenship to register, and rules requiring USPS to stop blindly mailing ballots to anyone without verifying they are eligible for mail voting. The old board slow walked both. So he cleared it out. Replacements need Senate confirmation, this is not a hostile takeover, it is the president using the power the Supreme Court just confirmed he has! Now the post office piece. Trump's executive order directs USPS to track ballots and only deliver them to voters on an approved list. Courts have already blocked several parts of it, ruling the president cannot unilaterally rewrite election rules, that power sits with states and Congress. What this really means is Trump keeps applying pressure on citizenship verification and mail ballot accountability heading into the midterms. Democrats are calling it interference because tighter verification makes it harder to run up numbers through a system nobody can fully audit. This is a developing story. Nothing is more important for November than voter integrity.

Bill Mitchell

90,829 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

💔 ROBERTS AND BARRETT JUST STABBED US IN THE BACK. AGAIN. The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. RNC that states do not have to receive mail-in ballots by Election Day for them to count. Postmarked by Election Day is good enough. Your ballot can wander through the postal system for days after the polls close and still be counted. And who wrote the majority opinion? Amy Coney Barrett. Who joined her? John Roberts. Along with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. The usual liberal bloc did what the usual liberal bloc does. But Barrett and Roberts had the power to stop this and chose not to. This is not a surprise from Roberts at this point. But Barrett? This is the justice we were promised would be different. This is the justice we fought for. This is the justice who just handed the left exactly what they wanted on mail-in ballot integrity. Five to four. One vote. That is the margin by which election integrity lost today. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh dissented. Alito was scathing. He wrote that allowing ballots to pour in after Election Day, while preliminary results are already being reported publicly, creates greater opportunity for fraud and risks further destroying public confidence in our elections. He is right. He has always been right on this. Here is what this means on the ground. States can now set their own deadlines for when mail-in ballots must be received after Election Day. Mississippi had five days. Washington State has twenty-one days. Twenty-one days of ballots trickling in after you thought the election was over. Think about what that looks like. Think about what that feels like to watch. You know exactly what it feels like. We have all lived it. Alito said it plainly in his dissent. When thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. He cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. We did not need a study to tell us that. The Save America Act, if passed, could address some of this going forward through Congress. But today's ruling makes clear that the legislative route is now the only route. The Court just took the judicial option off the table. Roberts and Barrett handed that decision to the same Congress where we are still fighting for a real majority. Barrett and Roberts folded. Again. Remember this the next time someone tells you that winning the White House is enough. It is not enough if the judges we are told to trust keep crossing the line when it matters most. Personnel is policy. And today, our personnel failed us.

Bill Mitchell

290,315 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This is raising the pressure on the Senate to pass the SAVE America Act Obama appointed judge in Boston has blocked President Trump from requiring proof of citizenship and mail-in ballot tracking for the November midterms across two dozen democrat states. The June 2026 Ruling: Judge Indira Talwani issued a preliminary injunction against a March executive order. The order directed the DHS and SSA to build "Confirmed Citizen Lists" and instructed the USPS to only deliver mail-in ballots to individuals on those approved lists. The Legal Reasoning: Judge Talwani ruled the provisions "legally void" for violating the separation of powers. She stated the Constitution does not grant the President specific power over elections, and Congress never authorized the USPS to regulate mail-in ballot delivery. The June 24 Ruling: This followed a decision by Chief Judge Denise Casper, who permanently blocked a separate 2025 order. That order attempted to require documentary proof of citizenship on federal voter registration forms and limit the counting of late mail-in ballots. What Happens Next? The injunctions currently apply to the 23 plaintiff states and Washington, D.C. (including swing states like Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin). Because the Senate has not passed the SAVE Act to codify these citizenship verification rules into federal law, the battle now shifts to the federal appeals courts and potentially the U.S. Supreme Court.

Victor Bigham 🇺🇸

12,709 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat