Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Over 6,000 Non-Citizens Registered to Vote in NJ Due to Software Error — Yet Gov. Sherrill Blames Trump A major election integrity issue in New Jersey: More than 6,000 non-citizens were automatically added to voter rolls because of a DMV software glitch, with around 400 illegally casting ballots since...

10,740 views • 10 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

TRUMP JUST ENDED THE U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Is Trump finally ending mail-in voter fraud? He fired the three remaining commissioners this week, leaving the board with zero members. The EAC is the obscure little agency that sets voting machine standards and controls the federal mail voter registration form. Here is the real story behind it. For over a year Trump has pushed two basic reforms through that commission: proof of citizenship to register, and rules requiring USPS to stop blindly mailing ballots to anyone without verifying they are eligible for mail voting. The old board slow walked both. So he cleared it out. Replacements need Senate confirmation, this is not a hostile takeover, it is the president using the power the Supreme Court just confirmed he has! Now the post office piece. Trump's executive order directs USPS to track ballots and only deliver them to voters on an approved list. Courts have already blocked several parts of it, ruling the president cannot unilaterally rewrite election rules, that power sits with states and Congress. What this really means is Trump keeps applying pressure on citizenship verification and mail ballot accountability heading into the midterms. Democrats are calling it interference because tighter verification makes it harder to run up numbers through a system nobody can fully audit. This is a developing story. Nothing is more important for November than voter integrity.

Bill Mitchell

90,829 views • 22 days ago

💔 ROBERTS AND BARRETT JUST STABBED US IN THE BACK. AGAIN. The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. RNC that states do not have to receive mail-in ballots by Election Day for them to count. Postmarked by Election Day is good enough. Your ballot can wander through the postal system for days after the polls close and still be counted. And who wrote the majority opinion? Amy Coney Barrett. Who joined her? John Roberts. Along with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. The usual liberal bloc did what the usual liberal bloc does. But Barrett and Roberts had the power to stop this and chose not to. This is not a surprise from Roberts at this point. But Barrett? This is the justice we were promised would be different. This is the justice we fought for. This is the justice who just handed the left exactly what they wanted on mail-in ballot integrity. Five to four. One vote. That is the margin by which election integrity lost today. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh dissented. Alito was scathing. He wrote that allowing ballots to pour in after Election Day, while preliminary results are already being reported publicly, creates greater opportunity for fraud and risks further destroying public confidence in our elections. He is right. He has always been right on this. Here is what this means on the ground. States can now set their own deadlines for when mail-in ballots must be received after Election Day. Mississippi had five days. Washington State has twenty-one days. Twenty-one days of ballots trickling in after you thought the election was over. Think about what that looks like. Think about what that feels like to watch. You know exactly what it feels like. We have all lived it. Alito said it plainly in his dissent. When thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. He cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. We did not need a study to tell us that. The Save America Act, if passed, could address some of this going forward through Congress. But today's ruling makes clear that the legislative route is now the only route. The Court just took the judicial option off the table. Roberts and Barrett handed that decision to the same Congress where we are still fighting for a real majority. Barrett and Roberts folded. Again. Remember this the next time someone tells you that winning the White House is enough. It is not enough if the judges we are told to trust keep crossing the line when it matters most. Personnel is policy. And today, our personnel failed us.

Bill Mitchell

290,077 views • 1 month ago

This is raising the pressure on the Senate to pass the SAVE America Act Obama appointed judge in Boston has blocked President Trump from requiring proof of citizenship and mail-in ballot tracking for the November midterms across two dozen democrat states. The June 2026 Ruling: Judge Indira Talwani issued a preliminary injunction against a March executive order. The order directed the DHS and SSA to build "Confirmed Citizen Lists" and instructed the USPS to only deliver mail-in ballots to individuals on those approved lists. The Legal Reasoning: Judge Talwani ruled the provisions "legally void" for violating the separation of powers. She stated the Constitution does not grant the President specific power over elections, and Congress never authorized the USPS to regulate mail-in ballot delivery. The June 24 Ruling: This followed a decision by Chief Judge Denise Casper, who permanently blocked a separate 2025 order. That order attempted to require documentary proof of citizenship on federal voter registration forms and limit the counting of late mail-in ballots. What Happens Next? The injunctions currently apply to the 23 plaintiff states and Washington, D.C. (including swing states like Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin). Because the Senate has not passed the SAVE Act to codify these citizenship verification rules into federal law, the battle now shifts to the federal appeals courts and potentially the U.S. Supreme Court.

Victor Bigham 🇺🇸

12,709 views • 5 days ago

🇺🇸 THE COURTS SCREW US AGAIN! - Why can't we just get the courts to go along with preventing mail-in ballot fraud? Let me paint the picture for you. Back in March, Trump signed an executive order on mail voting. Homeland Security would build a list of confirmed citizens eligible to vote in each state, pulled from citizenship and naturalization records. The Postal Service would then deliver ballots only to people on that list. Simple. Verify the citizen, then mail the ballot. And the courts are actually blocking this! A judge in Boston froze it on June 25 after 23 states and DC sued. Saturday the First Circuit backed her two to one, three months out from the midterms! Frustration! But let's look closer at that ruling: The appeals court never decided whether the order is actually legal. Justice argued the suit "came too early" since no agency had finalized any rules, and the panel simply said the states can sue now instead of waiting. That's a fight over timing, not the merits. A damned technicality! And a judge in Washington already went the other way on a similar challenge. This is a split heading for the Supreme Court, not a settled verdict! Once again everyone is punting! France banned mail voting back in 1975 after ballots in Corsica were cast for dead men. Why can't America just get this right? So what now? The judge said Congress never gave the President this power, and she has a point. There's already a bill for that. It's called the SAVE America Act. Once again the courts have failed us on election integrity. Am I looking at this wrong? ⬇️

Bill Mitchell

15,513 views • 5 days ago

BJP has perfected the dirty art of voter roll tampering. They did the warm-up in Delhi and Maharashtra. Now they are playing the real match in Bengal. In Maharashtra, 43,84,814 voters were added in 5 years, and another 40,81,229 were added in just 5 months. In Delhi: 4,16,648 voters were added in 4 years, and another 3,99,362 were added in just 7 months. I had warned then that the real rigging is not in EVMs, it’s in the electoral rolls. Bengal is now witnessing exactly that. This video clearly shows cartons filled with fraudulent Form 6 applications being openly submitted at the Chief Electoral Officer’s office, and stacked on the third floor raising serious concerns about an attempt to illegally bring in voters from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh into Bengal’s electoral rolls. And it is shocking how the Election Commission of India has rolled over and allowed this conspiracy. Nowhere in the Election Commission’s rules is bulk submission of Form 6 permitted. The limit is clearly capped at 50 applications per individual. Yet here, thousands of forms are being submitted by just a handful of people- something that is not only a blatant violation of the rules but also strikes at the very foundation of a free and fair electoral process. We call ourselves the world’s largest democracy, yet the very custodian of our democratic rights is actively facilitating its sabotage. When BJP shouted “Paltano Dorkar”, they actually meant “VOTER ROLLS PALTANO DORKAR”. When they screamed “Poriborton”, they meant a DEMOGRAPHIC PORIBORTON, replacing Bengal’s own electorate with voters brought in from BJP-ruled states.

Abhishek Banerjee

423,269 views • 4 months ago