正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Over the past 10 days, I've been developing an app called ICE Home Up. So far, I've added more than 20 features, created tons of customizable animation parameters, and experimented with a wide variety of animation effects. One of my most exciting creations is something I call the "Scroll...

107,318 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The gold standard fluid interactions on iOS are built using in-process client animations (like SwiftUI does it) and not render-server animations (like CoreAnimation does it). This is common knowledge inside of Apple’s UI framework and system experience teams. A close inspection of iOS’s evolution reveals the gradual upgrading of system experiences written using render-server animations (that often disable user interaction) with ones using client animations (that are interruptible and interactive). The app switcher for iPhone X, the Dynamic Island, and Liquid Glass bars are prime examples of this trend. The other thing that makes these experiences feel so fluid is their use of spring animations that preserve velocity, rather than Bézier curve easing functions. To get velocity preservation, you need to be able to interrupt a spring animation and retarget it or drive it with a gesture. That’s a lot easier to do when the animation is running in the same process as the event handling. When we were first pitching SwiftUI, two of our go-to demos were a recreation of the iOS 9 navigation and Home Screen interactions which were fully interactive and interruptible, at a time when the actual implementations of those experiences in the OS disabled user interaction and ran server-side animations. CoreAnimation is great and the framework does much more than animation. You can build a fine app using its server-side animations. But if your UI framework can’t do efficient main thread client animations, there’s a ceiling to the quality of the experience your app can provide.

Kyle Macomber

194,486 次观看 • 28 天前

I'm a EURUSD only swing trader and passed a $50k Lucid Flex account within a week. As a swing trader I never understood the big deal with Futures props or why they became so popular. I've taken the time to try and understand a little more recently and felt the only way to understand it would be to experience it for myself - and go through the process. So I purchased a Lucid Flex account last week - and am within $200 of hitting the $3k target on a $50k account. First time ever doing Futures - and I've been trading them the exact same way I have always traded. EURUSD only on the 4hr tf for entries and exits. So far from what I can tell is that it's the cheap cost of entry that reels people in. The challenges are "maybe" easier to pass as they are quicker to pass (6% required and no daily loss limit) but there are also consistency rules and an end of day trailing DD of $2k to contend with which shouldn't be a problem for an intra-day trader anyway. So I'll give futures props the win when it comes to speed of passing an eval. After that, should you get to funded I really still don't see the attraction as the payouts are limited to $2k for a standard $50k acc which is what most people go for as far as I know (due to the favourable max loss/profit ratio required). You can buy 5x $50k accts with firms such as Lucid and Tradeify so IF you make it to payout and copy trade all your accounts that's a $10k payout with 1 firm on x5 accounts. Not only that - but you are limited to 1 contract on the first 1k of profits, then 2 contracts once you hit $2k etc.. so it's basically another added phase once you're funded as you are limited to what you can do (maybe not a bad thing). AND you are also required to build a $2k buffer I believe before you can even withdraw? So to withdraw $2k on a $50k acc you need to make $4k? Once you get into it the only thing my learning experience so far has led me to believe is that we have a LOT of desperate traders with very little cash to invest in a proper CFD challenge. Which then leads me to believe 90%+ of the space is filled with gamblers who are uneducated in the craft of trading. If I were to say the word 'Personal account' to a lot of younger people nowadays they would most likely look at me with a confused face. For me - the payout potential just doesn't get me going. As someone whose been used to 5k-40k payouts over my 21 months trading CFD props (I haven't traded props since April 2025) the amount of money you can make with a CFD 2step program is far greater imo. Happy to have someone more experienced in the Futures space comment below and convince/educate me otherwise. Hopefully I can pass this account and get to a payout but I'll continue to document the process here! I've just purchased 4 more accounts with Lucid to copy trade as all this effort for a potential $2k payout just isn't the one. Let's see how it goes. Not only that, but I've also decided to purchase 5x $50k accounts with Tradeify on the Select Program. It's basically the same as the Lucid Flex account but the eval stage has a 40% consistency rule instead of 50% consistency like the Lucid Flex accounts. I'll continue to document and update on my progress but more importantly I look forward to your comments/questions below!

The Euro Trader

24,583 次观看 • 1 个月前