OVERPOPULATION THEORY - Ideology | Mindset 🧵

1. One pervasive ideology that seems to have penetrated western society seems to be the idea that rate of human reproduction and growth is destroying the planet. More recently there have been opposing figures that reveal they think we are actually on the brink of population collapse. Recently Elon Musk spoke out about what he deems as an existential thread to the survival of humanity. That is, Population Collapse. What's mind blowing is, that Elon Musk was aware of this more than 20 x years ago, when prominent opposing figures have been arguing the destruction of the Planet from unchecked Human reproduction For the last few decades, or at least for the last half of the 18th century, key figures, organisations and countries have been involved in the propagation, financing and policy making to control “rapid population growth” and deal with in forms described as "reproductive health". These figures and organisations, have unfortunately held more power and influence over how the message of population has been shaped Globally in all forms of society This is an important point. Can you imagine for example, what would would have happened to the direction of the World Health Organisation, if the 80%+ of funding it gets from Bill Gates, was instead received from pro-expansionist minded people like Elon Musk? So who are the key figures and organisations that seem to be controlling this narrative? The obvious ones that we all know about are: ◻️Bill Gates ◻️World Economic Forum (WEF) ◻️World Health Organisation (WHO) ◻️Population Council ◻️The Eugenics Movement For the purposes of this thread and to build upon it in future threads, I'll just limit it to a narrow group. Because it gives us a good overview of how finance and Global organisational influence has dictated how the message of population is delivered and which then influences the minds of citizens that reside in both western democracies and developing nations What’s the truth about Population growth? Who's right? Is Elon Musk an important person to listen to, or is the "Extinctionist movement" (as Elon puts) correct in assuming that Humans will eventually destroy Earth if they are left to reproduce without government controls in place? As you'll see further in this thread, the more important and nuanced question to ask is - "Is overpopulation theory something that applies to all countries equally? Are the true motives more related to national security issues, or a fear of being out-birthed?" In other words, is Western Civilisation trying to control the rates in other societies because they feel threatened, which is also in turn creating a global problem of reproductive health services and mindset influencing citizens in countries that have declining birth rates? One of the earliest examples of this idea (not the earliest I'm sure) to present here are from Eugenics publications in the early 1900'ds. Some of the key passages I'll describe, begin to paint a picture about the fear of the rate of reproduction in other other countries like India, whilst at the same time clearly mentioning concerns of birth rate DECLINE in Western Civilisations, such as Britain This made me ponder the idea that the whole ideology of overpopulation as being more nuanced and complicated then originally thought. It includes factors like religion, ethnicity and national security. And when different civilisations meet to address what they deem a problem, may not be a problem for both sides of the equation. And also the people that are shaping the narrative of overpopulation may also be corrupting and influencing the minds of people in countries that clearly have declining birth rates

2. January 1938 - "The Eugenics Review". This publication is from 1938. Another interesting mention is the case of a women that was Sterilised against her will and was suing her own mother. According to this case, at this time, children were “RATED” intellectually and mentally, to see whether it was legally allowed or recommended to sterilise a child. In this case, the 20 x year old child was mentally rated to an 11 x year old, so the parents agreed to sterilise her. Just imagine your own child. They all seem so intelligent even at a much younger age. How were they rating them? Was it accurate? Was it because of the education they were receiving? What factors were involved? QUOTE from a 1936 Sterilization Case: "Miss Hewitt sued her mother and two medical practitioners for $500,000 on the ground that without her knowledge or consent these practitioners had sterilized her at Ms Hewitt's (mother) request. Ms Hewitt and the practitioners pleaded that the operation was for Miss Hewitt's welfare, a California State Health Department psychologist having rated her in 1934, when she was 20, as having a mental age of 11" So here we can clearly see a landscape of ideology that was very harsh on the idea of human life. We can see that Eugenics was initially a key ideology in some western democracies, that worked in sterilization campaigns as a form of population control. At this point there was already CLEAR evidence of birthrate decline in the Western World, with fear of population growth in other countries. And yet Globally since then, many key figures have pushed the idea that the population is growing far too rapidly QUOTE: "He said that ever since about 1870 our birth-rate had been falling more and more steeply [that meant] that our population would then start decreasing-at first slowly, then progressively faster". Added to that was "Perhaps the most disquieting phenomenon of a declining birth-rate was the progressive rise in the average age of the population [so how would] this affect the security of the Empire? and our standard of life"? While we and the other Western Powers would be declining in numbers, the countries of the Balkans, Soviet Russia, and the peoples of the far East (with their already vast populations) would still be continuing to multiply" So then, why is it that modern day proponents say our population is growing too rapidly? Is it possible that the real reason behind this push, is because fertility in western nations were falling but other developing countries and religions were rising and the message was confused so that western countries adopted the idea, further increasing the rapid rate of birth decline in Western democracies?

3. THE WHO - In 1948, The World Health Organisation came into being. At that point it gave itself full immunity from liability. According to this document, they can’t be arrested or held accountable for any damage they cause. After the nation states all signed up and the WHO was created, one of the key policy focuses following that, was the idea of population. The WHO have been instrumental in developing methods and advising on Global policy for curbing population growth "CONVENTION ON PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES" ANNEX VII - THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION In their application to the World Health Organization (hereinafter called “the Organization”) the standard clauses shall operate subject to the following modifications: 1. Article V and Section 25, paragraphs 1 and 2 (I), of Article VII shall extend to persons designated to serve on the Executive Board of the Organization, their alternates and advisers, except that any waiver of the immunity of any such persons under Section 16 shall be by the Board. 2. (i) Experts (other than officials coming within the scope of Article VI) serving on committees of, or performing missions for, the Organization shall be accorded the following privileges and immunities so far as is necessary for the effective exercise of their functions, including the time spent on journeys in connexion with service on such committees or missions: (a) Immunity from personal arrest or seizure of their personal baggage; (b) In respect of words spoken or written or acts done by them in the performance of their official functions, immunity of legal process of every kind, such immunity to continue notwithstanding that the persons concerned are no longer serving on committees of, or employed on missions for, the Organization; c) The same facilities in respect of currency and exchange restrictions and in respect of their personal baggage as are accorded to officials of foreign governments on temporary official missions; (d) Inviolability for all papers and documents; (e) For the purpose of their communications with the Organization, the right to use codes and to receive papers or correspondence by courier or in sealed bags (ii) The privileges and immunities set forth in paragraphs (b) and (e) above shall be accorded to persons serving on Expert Advisory Panels of the Organization in the exercise of their functions as such. (iii) Privileges and immunities are granted to the experts of the Organization in the interests of the Organization and not for the personal benefit of the individuals themselves. The Organization shall have the right and the duty to waive the immunity of any expert in any case where in its opinion the immunity would impede the course of justice and it can be waived without prejudice to the interests of the Organization. 3. Article V and Section 25, paragraphs 1 and 2 (I), of Article VII shall extend to the representatives of Associate Members participating in the work of the Organization in accordance with Articles 8 and 47 of the Constitution. 4. The privileges, immunities, exemptions and facilities referred to in Section 21 of the standard clauses shall also be accorded to any Deputy Director-General, Assistant Director-General and Regional Director of the Organization" END of Document Why am I even mentioning this document, as it relates to population growth? Because, as far as the programs and treatments offered from these Global entities, any harm inflicted by this particular one, bares no accountability, or at least this document says you can not hold an official accountable should they harm someone. And as we will see, novel treatments like fertility vaccines have been one of the treatments offered as a "solution" to the destruction of Earth. So, if the World Health Organisation funds these programs or gets it's nation states to enact clinical trials using clinical trial participants, any harm that comes out from those actions can not be blamed on the WHO Now, on to some of the key organisations, figures and key moments in history involving overpopulation ideology

4. The New York based Population Council was a nongovernmental organisation which came to play a crucial role in sustaining the interest in Family Planning. This organisation came out of 1952 meeting that John D Rockefeller the 3rd organised in Williamsburg, Virginia. The different reasons that came out of that desire was for economic development, geopolitics, conservation and eugenics Another organisation formed was "The Club of Rome", founded in 1968. We will clearly see later in the thread it’s continued impact on the psyches of people with immense influence in the European parliament. In 1971-72 they commissioned - “The Limits to Growth", a "1972 report[2] that discussed the possibility of exponential economic and population growth with finite supply of resources"

5. Going back to the World Health Organisation. One of their keen areas of interest in Population control and Reproductive Health was birth control methods, vaccines and other devices In particular, one division out of the World Health Organisation began in the early 1970's, a division focused on reproductive health. This division was headed by a scientist that began developing birth control vaccines, which would essentially use the bodies own immune system to attack the females reproductive hormones, preventing the implantation of fertilised eggs It was also at this point in the 1970’s, in India, were the government had taken the idea and danger of “population growth” to astounding new levels. The Indian government began implementing sterilisation policy as a form of population control. potentially led by these prior organisations and ideology, such as that seen in Eugenics and with the Population Council that was also becoming prominent

6. The India Emergency in the 1970's was one of the most stunning periods of time, in which mass sterilisation campaigns were implemented by the government, where "some 8 million people were sterilised". Prime Minister Indira Gandhi even admitted and did not refute the following statements: ◻️"All eligible cases for sterilisation in my office and department have been sterilised. Persons who have refused to get themselves sterilised, have not been paid their salaries" ◻️"A combination of intimidation, coercion, economic sanction, not giving people licences, not giving people rights to free education and health and so on, were used by officials, throughout India, to force people in effect to have sterilization" "yes they were, certainly...they certainly were" - But she didn't think they were excess at all, instead doubling down on the fear narrative surrounding population growth

7. As you can see, in the 1970’s, multiple forces were meeting to create a powerful linking of ideology and government policy support, which was also being globalised through the world health organisation. Some of those entities include collaberative ones that linked the Indian Government with the WHO, like the ICMR/WHO. Obviously these aren’t the only forces at play, but just one line of information I want to focus on for the purposes of this growing thread which will be linked to a larger story coming up

8. The India emergency was well documented. Millions of people were sterilised in the 1970’s. In one report, shockingly, the WORLD BANK President Robert McNamara, commented on Gandhi's Emergency Period Population policies, saying that he was "encouraged" by what he was seeing, saying (Record from "Notes on visit to India, 6-12 November, 1976") that: "At long last India is moving to effectively address it's population problem"

9. Throughout India's Emergency Period, the following organisations were some of the organisations which continued funding Family Planning programs in India: ◻️ The World Bank ◻️ UNFPA (United Nations Fund for Population Activities) ◻️ IPPF (International Planned Parenthood Federation) ◻️ Swedish International Development Agency Nafis Sadik, who became executive director of UNFPA, mentioned that compulsory sterilisation should not receive funding from the UN, but also stated that "compulsion may be needed at the expense of human rights" Robert McNamara (The World Bank) is Pictured here with then India Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. This is in 1968/69, prior to Indias Emergency period. Which tells us that the groundwork was being laid around population policy long before the Indian government went into the full scale sterilisation campaign

10. Some roots of Overpopulation Ideology in India actually appear to begin a little further back in the 1950's. It appears that just after the Incorporation of the Population Council in 1952, which followed 3 x weeks late rby the founding of International Planned Parenthood Federation, that financial and political moves were exerted towards and within India. For example: ◻️ 7 November 1952 - Nehru (Indias Prime Minister from 1947-1964) presented the first policy into India's Parliament about "population limitation", which acknowledged "family planning" and called for "reducing birth rates" ◻️ 1953 - 1956 - "The Rockefeller Foundation set aside almost a quarter of a million dollars [for] a single family planning project in Punjab" ◻️ 1950's - Kingsley Davis, who published "World Population Trends and American Policy" with the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, proclaims that: "India had a chance to be the first country to achieve a major revolution in human life-the planned diffusion of fertility control in a peasant population prior to, and for the benefit of, the urban industrial transition" So we can clearly see that from the 1930's in Eugenics Publications, followed by nongovernmental Population organisations in America (like the Population Council) and other countries, that individuals were concerned about population growth in countries like India. Key figures were actively involved in shaping the activities related to management of population, which in this time seemed to focus heavily on India. It appears that initiatives related to population ramped up heavily in the decade of 1950

11. In the 1970's, all the forces and finances mentioned above, finally were put into action and were provided with the necessary resources to begin the mass sterilisation campaign. Interestingly, working alongside India's forced sterilisation campaign, was the increasing prominence of an Indian Immunologist and vaccine developer Gursaran Pran Talwar

12. Gursaran Pran Talwar, Indian scientist & vaccine developer, was empowered by the World Health Organisation in the early 1970's, beginning development, research and testing of an anti-fertility vaccine. His particular vaccine, targeted Human Chorionic Growth Hormone, or HCG He also joined key organisations involved in Population Control Activities: ◻️ Head, ICMR-WHO Research and Training Centre in Immunology for India and South East Asia (1972-91) ◻️ Talwar was Project Leader and Member Executive, International Committee on Contraception Research and Population Council, New York (1975-94) ◻️ Member, WHO Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines (1984-90) Talwar was the head of the joint ICMR (India) - WHO partnership, which began in 1972, just years before the India Emergency began taking shape

13. 1970 - Big decade for overpopulation theory & population extinctionists. The Club of Rome, to this day, has taken the minds of key figures in the EU. Here Ursula von der Leyen seemingly praises their vision Obviously there are many more key moments, but here is just a few to get a "feel" for the massive push from Western Organisations, for the purposes of this thread: ◻️ The Club of Rome release report - “The Limits to Growth", a 1972 report discussing the possibility of exponential economic and population growth with finite supply of resources ◻️The WHO partner with ICMR ◻️Indian Immunologist Talwar begins testing and developing an anti-fertility vaccine, targeting a sub-unit of HCG and eventually conjugating it together with Tetanus for a more robust immune response to HCG ◻️The India Emergency ramps up in 1976, where millions of Indians are sterilised I'd like to bring in another unlikely country that enters the arena here, to finance population control activities and research, both locally and in other developing countries

14. In 1979, Australia enters the Arena of overpopulation ideology, at least as far as public records in parliament are concerned. Australia was openly talking about population control in 1979. With an astounding level of ease and intriguing forthrightness, Senator Knight asks the Minister of Foreign Affairs in 1979: “What assistance has Australia provided to programs, either through international organisations or bilateral programs, to assist in the control of world population growth.”

15. Senator Carrick, in 1979 after questioned what assistance has Australia provided in the areas of World Population Growth, answered that Australia has funded programs internationally. According to his statement, Australia at this point in 1979, had funded a “Bangladesh Population Project which is designed to reduce fertility, mortality and morbidity” and also $2.6 million into a family planning project in Thailand. With that was the planned contributions toward: ◻️International Planned Parenthood Federation - $180,000 ◻️International Union for the Scientific Study of Population - $25, 000 ◻️United Nations Fund for Population Activities - $721,000 Senator Carrick also stated that: “Since the World Population Conference in 1974, assistance to the population sector is no longer considered to be limited to family planning activities, but instead is considered to embrace activities in all areas that influence population”

16. Senator Carrick (Full Answer from Transcript in 1979) - The Foreign Minister has provided the following answer to the honourable [Senator Knight's] question [“What assistance has Australia provided to programs, either through international organisations or bilateral programs, to assist in the control of world population growth.”] : "Assistance for population activities is directed both through bilateral programs and multilateral channels. Currently more emphasis is placed on bilateral projects involving international agencies which are considered to be well equipped to handle population problems and research. Such assistance forms part of Australia's effort to work towards the social and economic improvement of developing countries." Australia, under its bilateral aid program, is supporting the First Bangladesh Population Project (1975-80) sponsored by the International Development Association, (IDA). This is an international program designed to expand Bangladeshi facilities for maternal and child health care and for family planning services. The Australian contribution to this project will amount to $2m. This project will be followed by the Second IDA Bangladesh Population Project which is designed to reduce fertility, mortality and morbidity by strengthening the Bangladesh population and health programs. The Australian contribution to this project will be $4m. In Thailand, Australia is providing an estimated $2.6m in a co-financing arrangement with the IDA for the expansion of family planning services and the extension of the Thai rural health network. Aspects of other projects, such as those oriented towards health and nutrition, can of course also be considered as involvement in the population sector. Australia will be contributing in 1979-80 to the International Planned Parenthood Federation ($180,000; and to the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population ($25,000), both Non-Government Organisations. Multilaterally Australia will contribute to the United Nations Fund for Population Activities ($72 1,000). Since the World Population Conference in 1974, assistance to the population sector is no longer considered to be limited to family planning activities, but instead is considered to embrace activities in all areas that influence population- such as nutrition, sanitation, health, education, the status of women and economic factors. Australia endorses this integrated approach, and in its aid program supports activities in all sectors relating to population matters."

17. So far, at least as far in this thread is concerned, we can see the beginnings of population ideology through Eugenics, the founding of the World Health organisation, leading to the implementation of the ICMR-WHO Partnership in 1972, all preceding the India Health Emergency with forced sterilisation, just years before we can see evidence of Australia funding family planning measures in “developing countries” like Bangladesh and Thailand. From 1972 - 1991 - Talwar was head of the research and training centre for ICMR-WHO in immunology for India and South East Asia. He had significantly furthered research into anti-fertility vaccines. We begin to see clinical trials for his pioneering work in birth control vaccines. Which brings us to the year 1988. In this year, at a University in Adelaide, Australia, collaborates with the World Health Organisation, in a clinical trial of the Anti Fertility HCG vaccine, conjugated with diphtheria

18. In 1988, Based on the Pioneering work of Talwar's Anti-Fertility HCG vaccine, a “Prototype consisting of synthetic peptide of hCG-specific portion of B-hCG (CTP) linked to diphtheria toxoid” went into “Phase 1 Trials” - With the collaberation of WHO/HRP (World Health Organisation) at Flinders Medical Centre in Adelaide Australia Other Western countries that were involved in similar research, include America and Sweden

19. Interestingly, as seen in the 1930's Eugenics Publication, The Australian Government (A "Western Civilisation") echos the mention of low fertility rates, in their official stance on population policy summarised in a 1994 report by the National Committee for the United Nations International Conference on Population and Development: “In the domestic context, Australia does not have an explicit or formal population policy directly aimed at influencing the level of population. After considerable public debate, the Government decided that a formal population policy (particularly one which would specify population targets) would not be appropriate for Australia, given its low levels of fertility”

20. So, it seems Australia was funding projects to control “World Population”, as evidenced from the parliamentary transcript, whilst also taking an active role, together with the World Health Organisation, in building and creating a medical paradigm that targeted female fertility. Essentially, that medical paradigm was a vaccine conjugated to diphtheria, to make the immune system attack it’s own reproductive hormones, which could almost be contextualised as a consented and purposefully implemented vaccine induced auto-immune condition to prevent pregnancy This was in the context of Western Democratic Countries experiencing low, or falling fertility rates, since at least the 1870's

21. Bill Gates begins to exert his immense financial influence into "Global Health" and "Reproductive Health" in the mid 1990's, around the time Bill Gates and Microsoft is targeted by the American States, facing investigation & potential prosecution, jail, fines. Around 1994, Bill Gates creates the "Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation"

22. Before Bill Gates creates the "Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation" and begins throwing money at reproductive health, we can see that his "mindset" has already been influenced by his father, who was involved in the "Planned Parenthood" organisation, that was founded in 1952. Remember, Vogt, who became National Director of the Planned Parenthood Federation had called for "Sterilisation Bonuses" at one point during the organisation's earlier inception. Why are these facts important? Because, as contextualised in Buddhist teachings: "Mind precedes all mental states. Mind is their chief; they are all mind-wrought. If with a pure mind a person speaks or acts happiness follows him like his never-departing shadow" In other words, the mind precedes all action and the quality of someones actions are effected by the quality of ones mind. What happens when that mind is empowered by enormous financial influence? This thread that we see, which appears to be an "urgent need" to deal with overpopulation, doesn't appear to lose strength over the years. In fact, the level of investment into various measures of "family planning" and "reproductive health" seems to have grown to epic proportions And that investment is largely funded into organisations like the World Health Organisation, which has the network and organisational capacity to use his wealth to attain his goals on a Global level. In a way, Bill Gates has made a VERY smart move investing into the World Health Organisation over the past almost 30 x years. If you consider it as a "bang for buck", he get's to link into an organisation that can effectively manage all aspects of Reproductive Health, the production and research of vaccines and the global infrastructure that has accumulated since the mid 1940's when the WHO was established According to one source, The Gates Foundation today accounts for somewhere around 88% of the World Health Organisation's funding So, it appears that the underpinnings of population ideology and methods to control it, come well before Bill Gates found “The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” in 1994 (when the first grant is registered). But given that Bill Gates’s father was involved with Planned Parenthood, as evidenced in this video, it’s safe to assume that Bill Gates’s ideology around population and how to manage it, stems at least from his father. How long his father has held that belief is another question for someone else to investigate In 1997 - The Gates Foundation made it’s first $2.25 Million donation to John Hopkins “to support the Institute for Population and Reproductive Health to strengthen leadership and institutions in the developing countries”. Then in 1999 a further $20 Million to John Hopkins - “to establish the Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health to strengthen leadership and institutions in the developing countries” Below is the mind of Bill Gates talking about population

23. From the year 2003 - 2013 we see various Grants from the Gates Foundation with different flavours, or tones. From National Security, to novel fertility treatments. The following Grants are listed by year: ◻️2003 - “to provide the latest research documenting the importance to U.S. national interests of achieving the goals established by the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD)”. ◻️2007 - “to review the state of knowledge in population and health issues as well as other population conditions affecting the African continent ◻️Sept 2010 - $500K “to support a special issue of Lancet on population and family planning in relation to achieving Millennium Development Goals” ◻️NOV 2010 - “to revitalise the global emergency contraception agenda and increase access in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia” In these Grants we see hints of National Security fears and what is mentioned as a "Global Emergency Contraception Agenda" In 2010 - 2012 was when things got really interesting with investments into novel treatments for fertility. Here’s some of the investments made by Gates: ◻️NOV 2010 - “to develop and test a nanoparticle contraceptive that releases sperm tail inhibitors in response to vaginal pH changes or exposure to prostatic fluid”. ◻️NOV 2010 - “to design and test molecules that will inactivate specific genes within sperm that are essential to the fertilization process for potential use in a reversible oral male contraceptive.” ◻️OCT 2011 - “to support extending the duration of action for injectable contraceptives” ◻️NOV 2011 - “to increase financial and policy support for the discovery and development of new and adaptive contraceptive technologies, ultimately leading to accelerated contraceptive uptake and improved access to high quality family planning options worldwide” ◻️DEC 2011 - A grant was made to the World Health Organisation - “to review the body of published evidence on hormonal contraception”. I believe this is likely a throwback to Talwar's research on Anti-HCG vaccines These Grants are but a drop in the ocean of Bill Gates's immense financial capacity which is pointed directly at the World Health Organisation, who is looking to garner more and more power over Global Health, including using Pandemic Treaties to control Global Pandemic response As I previously mentioned, The WHO, according to one source receives well over 80% of their funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The have the organisational capacity to implement his goals and dreams related to population

24. I want to close this thread in the period 2012-2014, where The World Economic Forum, in collaboration with Bill Gates are featured in a document called the “Global Agenda Council on Population Growth 2012-2014”. This Agenda mentions that “the Council is developing tailored policy briefs for the governments of three countries – Nigeria, Rwanda and Pakistan – that are undergoing important demographic transformations and may be able to realise a positive “population dividend” in the coming decades” As public interest has grown more aware about the plans of these elite organisations, they seem to have gradually become more and more careful with public statements about population, since it draws too much attention. One wonders what closed door sessions look like nowadays. I'm going to finish up here. I have planned threads coming up that will link into this As we can see in the posts above. There has been a definite campaign against population growth, especially in non-Western countries, funded by both nongovernmental organisations and governments in other key areas. And one thing seems to be clear, much of the fear against population growth seems to be directed towards non Western Countries The Rockefellers, Population Council, Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum, Bill Gates, The World Health Organisation, to name a few, have all been instrumental in shaping the Population Extinctionist Movement, which Elon Musk is now calling out as a total scam And let's not forget, the World Health Organisation, largely influenced by Bill Gates, has given itself complete immunity should it be moving us all in the wrong direction. It's written into their charter