Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Oversight Project Vice President for Litigation Jeff Clark breaks down the recent revelation in the Jack Smith saga after Senator Chuck Grassley revealed that Smith obtained text messages of 40 Republican lawmakers during his probe. “Jack Smith is gonna try to split hairs… The information he got from the...

OANN's profile picture

One America News

2,337,920 subscribers

27,520 views • 23 hours ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyEducationNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

DOJ records released by Sen. Chuck Grassley and Sen. Ron Johnson show Jack Smith’s team reviewed communications involving 44 members of Congress. Mike Davis: "Jack Smith lied. He said that he did not get their text messages, and now we know from Chuck Grassley's oversight and Ron Johnson's oversight that Jack Smith did get text messages. Jack Smith needs to be indicted and put in prison." 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸
5:08

DOJ records released by Sen. Chuck Grassley and Sen. Ron Johnson show Jack Smith’s team reviewed communications involving 44 members of Congress. Mike Davis: "Jack Smith lied. He said that he did not get their text messages, and now we know from Chuck Grassley's oversight and Ron Johnson's oversight that Jack Smith did get text messages. Jack Smith needs to be indicted and put in prison." 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

Bannon’s WarRoom

34,714 views • 2 days ago

FLASHBACK: Jack Smith denied spying on Members of Congress and reading their text messages. Q: “Did the records that you requested from the Member of Congress include the content of text messages?" Smith: “No.” Jack Smith LIED UNDER OATH. Time to charge him with PERJURY.
1:04

FLASHBACK: Jack Smith denied spying on Members of Congress and reading their text messages. Q: “Did the records that you requested from the Member of Congress include the content of text messages?" Smith: “No.” Jack Smith LIED UNDER OATH. Time to charge him with PERJURY.

Benny Johnson

230,574 views • 2 days ago

JUST IN: Jack Smith In Danger of Criminal Charges for Alleged Perjury “So, on Jack Smith, Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley… unearthed clear evidence that Jack Smith testified to Congress that he did not look at the substance of these phone calls or text messages. He said he just got the toll records for members of Congress, which he didn't notify them about, which is a violation of the law. But he got their toll records, which show when they made the calls and the duration of the calls. But apparently, they said they didn't listen to the calls or read the text messages. We just found out from Chairman Chuck Grassley, working with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel, that yes, in fact, Jack Smith did read the substance of the communications, the text messages, of members of Congress, 44 of them, including 20 U.S. senators and 24 members of the House, including the House leadership, like the House Speaker and the House Majority Leader. This has to be prosecuted. This is a pretty clear case of providing false statements to Congress under USC Section 1001 at a minimum. More likely, it's perjury because he was under oath.” Mike Davis of the Article 3 project hammered former Special Counsel Jack Smith over evidence he committed perjury before Congress. House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan revealed on "Hannity" that Jack Smith could face a congressional referral, arguing new evidence raises serious questions about whether he lied under oath and abused his investigative powers.
2:15

JUST IN: Jack Smith In Danger of Criminal Charges for Alleged Perjury “So, on Jack Smith, Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley… unearthed clear evidence that Jack Smith testified to Congress that he did not look at the substance of these phone calls or text messages. He said he just got the toll records for members of Congress, which he didn't notify them about, which is a violation of the law. But he got their toll records, which show when they made the calls and the duration of the calls. But apparently, they said they didn't listen to the calls or read the text messages. We just found out from Chairman Chuck Grassley, working with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel, that yes, in fact, Jack Smith did read the substance of the communications, the text messages, of members of Congress, 44 of them, including 20 U.S. senators and 24 members of the House, including the House leadership, like the House Speaker and the House Majority Leader. This has to be prosecuted. This is a pretty clear case of providing false statements to Congress under USC Section 1001 at a minimum. More likely, it's perjury because he was under oath.” Mike Davis of the Article 3 project hammered former Special Counsel Jack Smith over evidence he committed perjury before Congress. House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan revealed on "Hannity" that Jack Smith could face a congressional referral, arguing new evidence raises serious questions about whether he lied under oath and abused his investigative powers.

Benny Johnson

45,320 views • 6 hours ago

🚨 WOW! A stunning revelation that Special Counsel Jack Smith SPIED ON the content of text messages of US Senators is resulting in calls for Smith to be prosecuted Smith surveilled over 40 LAWMAKERS, mostly GOP PERJURY! He likely LIED TO CONGRESS: Smith said "no," he didn't spy on text messages, but he DID "Some are now accusing Jack Smith of LYING UNDER OATH." Jack Smith is a dirty deep stater. Prosecute him NOW!
1:55

🚨 WOW! A stunning revelation that Special Counsel Jack Smith SPIED ON the content of text messages of US Senators is resulting in calls for Smith to be prosecuted Smith surveilled over 40 LAWMAKERS, mostly GOP PERJURY! He likely LIED TO CONGRESS: Smith said "no," he didn't spy on text messages, but he DID "Some are now accusing Jack Smith of LYING UNDER OATH." Jack Smith is a dirty deep stater. Prosecute him NOW!

Eric Daugherty

38,431 views • 1 day ago

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Jack Smith’s Team Spied on TEXT MESSAGES of 44 Members of Congress — Including Republicans AND Democrats New records show Smith’s probe scooped up communications from over 40 lawmakers (mostly Republicans, but also Cory Booker and Karen Bass) during the Trump investigation. Sen. Chuck Grassley dropped the receipts. Republicans are furious, accusing Smith of lying under oath in a December deposition when he claimed they didn’t collect text messages. Sen. Rand Paul: “Jack Smith swore under oath he didn't spy on text messages... Today, new evidence confirms he spied on dozens of members of Congress, myself included. This is a blatant abuse of power.” Sen. Josh Hawley: “It looks like perjury.” Congress now planning to drag Smith back for a public hearing. Weaponization of government at its finest. Time for full accountability. TIME TO PROSECUTE JACK SMITH!
3:11

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Jack Smith’s Team Spied on TEXT MESSAGES of 44 Members of Congress — Including Republicans AND Democrats New records show Smith’s probe scooped up communications from over 40 lawmakers (mostly Republicans, but also Cory Booker and Karen Bass) during the Trump investigation. Sen. Chuck Grassley dropped the receipts. Republicans are furious, accusing Smith of lying under oath in a December deposition when he claimed they didn’t collect text messages. Sen. Rand Paul: “Jack Smith swore under oath he didn't spy on text messages... Today, new evidence confirms he spied on dozens of members of Congress, myself included. This is a blatant abuse of power.” Sen. Josh Hawley: “It looks like perjury.” Congress now planning to drag Smith back for a public hearing. Weaponization of government at its finest. Time for full accountability. TIME TO PROSECUTE JACK SMITH!

Gunther Eagleman™

47,948 views • 1 day ago

Jack Smith testified under oath that he did not spy on Members of Congress and didn’t read their text messages. Bombshell new DOJ documents just revealed Smith and his team reviewed the communications of 44 Members of Congress. Lying to Congress Under Oath is called perjury and is a felony under 18 U.S. Code 1001 §§ 1621, which carries a punishment of up to five years in prison. Smith must be charged.
9:02

Jack Smith testified under oath that he did not spy on Members of Congress and didn’t read their text messages. Bombshell new DOJ documents just revealed Smith and his team reviewed the communications of 44 Members of Congress. Lying to Congress Under Oath is called perjury and is a felony under 18 U.S. Code 1001 §§ 1621, which carries a punishment of up to five years in prison. Smith must be charged.

Benny Johnson

220,591 views • 2 days ago

Sen. Josh Hawley says Jack Smith illegally accessed his text messages and phone records, accusing the special counsel of lying under oath and violating the Constitution: “Well, we know that he read my text messages. Yes, absolutely, Sean. He also tracked my phone. He tracked my whereabouts and my location, and monitored my incoming and outgoing calls.What did he do with the text messages? We don’t know that yet. What we do know is that he absolutely read them. He absolutely shared them with members of his team. And all of that was done illegally. The Justice Department requires screening for any communications involving members of Congress. Jack Smith said under oath, as you just played, that he didn’t seek the text messages of members of Congress. But we now know that he did. So he lied, he violated the law, he violated the Constitution, and this guy ought to be prosecuted.”
0:38

Sen. Josh Hawley says Jack Smith illegally accessed his text messages and phone records, accusing the special counsel of lying under oath and violating the Constitution: “Well, we know that he read my text messages. Yes, absolutely, Sean. He also tracked my phone. He tracked my whereabouts and my location, and monitored my incoming and outgoing calls.What did he do with the text messages? We don’t know that yet. What we do know is that he absolutely read them. He absolutely shared them with members of his team. And all of that was done illegally. The Justice Department requires screening for any communications involving members of Congress. Jack Smith said under oath, as you just played, that he didn’t seek the text messages of members of Congress. But we now know that he did. So he lied, he violated the law, he violated the Constitution, and this guy ought to be prosecuted.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

108,062 views • 22 hours ago

ARCTIC FROST: Senator Grassley revealed today that more than 20% of Republican Members of Congress were being spied on by Jack Smith and Biden's DOJ. Today he revealed that Senator Cruz's office landline was tapped by the FBI. Jack Smith and Judge Boasberg ordered his cell provider, AT&T, to provide his phone records and ordered them not to tell Cruz about the order claiming he would destroy evidence and obstruct justice if they revealed the orders to him.
5:53

ARCTIC FROST: Senator Grassley revealed today that more than 20% of Republican Members of Congress were being spied on by Jack Smith and Biden's DOJ. Today he revealed that Senator Cruz's office landline was tapped by the FBI. Jack Smith and Judge Boasberg ordered his cell provider, AT&T, to provide his phone records and ordered them not to tell Cruz about the order claiming he would destroy evidence and obstruct justice if they revealed the orders to him.

@amuse

25,783 views • 8 months ago

CNN NewsNight panelist Jeffrey Toobin claims “it’s not even news” and “wasn’t an overreach” for Jack Smith to track the private communications and phone calls of nearly a dozen Republican senators. Abby Phillip: “Was it an overreach on Jack Smith’s part.” Jeffrey Toobin: “Well, not only wasn‘t it an overreach, it‘s not even news. Jack Smith cites these conversations in his report. So this is not like he was trying to keep this a secret. And remember what Jack Smith was investigating. He was investigating Donald Trump‘s attempts to overturn the election through the use of fake electors in Congress.” “He was lobbying members of Congress to do just that. That was evidence in the case. So it is, of course, appropriate for him to investigate the time and nature, or at least the time and the duration of calls with members of Congress. It‘s a complete non-story, except that Jack Smith was doing his job.” Incredible!
1:24

CNN NewsNight panelist Jeffrey Toobin claims “it’s not even news” and “wasn’t an overreach” for Jack Smith to track the private communications and phone calls of nearly a dozen Republican senators. Abby Phillip: “Was it an overreach on Jack Smith’s part.” Jeffrey Toobin: “Well, not only wasn‘t it an overreach, it‘s not even news. Jack Smith cites these conversations in his report. So this is not like he was trying to keep this a secret. And remember what Jack Smith was investigating. He was investigating Donald Trump‘s attempts to overturn the election through the use of fake electors in Congress.” “He was lobbying members of Congress to do just that. That was evidence in the case. So it is, of course, appropriate for him to investigate the time and nature, or at least the time and the duration of calls with members of Congress. It‘s a complete non-story, except that Jack Smith was doing his job.” Incredible!

RedWave Press

253,261 views • 9 months ago

.Matt Gaetz suggests that Rep. Mark Harris press Jack Smith on allegations that a federal prosecutor attempted to BRIBE the lawyer of a top Trump aide by offering a federal judgeship in exchange for testimony against the president. “They literally tried to bribe this poor guy's lawyer with a federal judgeship. I would ask Jack Smith what he did to ensure the member of his team—the prosecutor who was doing this—was held accountable.” Watch The Matt Gaetz Show Here:
2:07

.Matt Gaetz suggests that Rep. Mark Harris press Jack Smith on allegations that a federal prosecutor attempted to BRIBE the lawyer of a top Trump aide by offering a federal judgeship in exchange for testimony against the president. “They literally tried to bribe this poor guy's lawyer with a federal judgeship. I would ask Jack Smith what he did to ensure the member of his team—the prosecutor who was doing this—was held accountable.” Watch The Matt Gaetz Show Here:

One America News

146,103 views • 5 months ago

Even CNN is now turning on Jack Smith after his House Judiciary testimony. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig zeroed in on the moment Republicans cornered Smith over rushing the Trump case right before the 2024 election — and Smith had no answer. HONIG: “To your question, Brianna, the last Congressman we saw brought up the fact that jack Smith demanded a trial date four months out, five months out in a case involving 13 MILLION pages of documents.” “There is no defense lawyer in the country who can constitutionally prepare for trial and defend his client on that short of time frame.” “The implication was you were rushing to get this in before the 2024 election.” “Jack Smith did not defend himself, by the way. He didn’t say a word about that, which I found, I found striking.” “And Jack Smith has always maintained this veneer that he never thought about the election…of course he did!” “Why would would you demand such a quick trial date?”
0:37

Even CNN is now turning on Jack Smith after his House Judiciary testimony. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig zeroed in on the moment Republicans cornered Smith over rushing the Trump case right before the 2024 election — and Smith had no answer. HONIG: “To your question, Brianna, the last Congressman we saw brought up the fact that jack Smith demanded a trial date four months out, five months out in a case involving 13 MILLION pages of documents.” “There is no defense lawyer in the country who can constitutionally prepare for trial and defend his client on that short of time frame.” “The implication was you were rushing to get this in before the 2024 election.” “Jack Smith did not defend himself, by the way. He didn’t say a word about that, which I found, I found striking.” “And Jack Smith has always maintained this veneer that he never thought about the election…of course he did!” “Why would would you demand such a quick trial date?”

Overton

397,286 views • 5 months ago

Rep. Jim Jordan blasts Jack Smith after the House Judiciary Committee released new documents on the DOJ’s “Arctic Frost” investigation: "With Jack Smith, what we learned is that his investigation was much broader and more expansive than we ever thought. And remember, this is the same Jack Smith who put a gag order on President Trump and who raided his home. This is the same Jack Smith whose two deputies came before our committee and took the Fifth—71 and 72 times, respectively. This is the same Jack Smith who we already know spied on eight United States senators. This is why we want Jack Smith in front of our committee, in a deposition format, after we get the documents—so we can ask him some of the same questions we asked his deputies, which they took the Fifth on."
0:52

Rep. Jim Jordan blasts Jack Smith after the House Judiciary Committee released new documents on the DOJ’s “Arctic Frost” investigation: "With Jack Smith, what we learned is that his investigation was much broader and more expansive than we ever thought. And remember, this is the same Jack Smith who put a gag order on President Trump and who raided his home. This is the same Jack Smith whose two deputies came before our committee and took the Fifth—71 and 72 times, respectively. This is the same Jack Smith who we already know spied on eight United States senators. This is why we want Jack Smith in front of our committee, in a deposition format, after we get the documents—so we can ask him some of the same questions we asked his deputies, which they took the Fifth on."

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

105,714 views • 8 months ago

Three things we learned today as we inch toward accountability in America: 1. Kash Patel had 2 years of his phone records and emails taken by Biden’s FBI. This included text messages. 2. Fourteen members of Congress were targeted in just one meeting with Jack Smith and the prosecutors. “A fishing expedition” to find dirt on the opposition candidate. 3. Chuck Grassley thinks Jack Smith might have perjured himself in front of Congress. Jack Smith said he barely relied on the evidence produced by the J6 committee, but today emails were released showing they were going page by page through all of it. They relied deeply on it. Look for Grassley to refer him to the DOJ. “The man twice elected by the United States people to be their president, was under constant FBI scrutiny for 10 consecutive years, and many many people are swept up in it.” John Solomon
2:16

Three things we learned today as we inch toward accountability in America: 1. Kash Patel had 2 years of his phone records and emails taken by Biden’s FBI. This included text messages. 2. Fourteen members of Congress were targeted in just one meeting with Jack Smith and the prosecutors. “A fishing expedition” to find dirt on the opposition candidate. 3. Chuck Grassley thinks Jack Smith might have perjured himself in front of Congress. Jack Smith said he barely relied on the evidence produced by the J6 committee, but today emails were released showing they were going page by page through all of it. They relied deeply on it. Look for Grassley to refer him to the DOJ. “The man twice elected by the United States people to be their president, was under constant FBI scrutiny for 10 consecutive years, and many many people are swept up in it.” John Solomon

TheStormHasArrived

167,272 views • 3 months ago

Newly released transcripts and videos show that former special counsel Jack Smith told lawmakers that the Jan. 6 riot, "does not happen without President Trump." That's from a closed-door hearing earlier this month with the House Judiciary Committee, where lawmakers grilled Smith for eight hours over two criminal investigations he launched into Trump. One focused on the president's role in trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election, while the other related to classified documents after Trump's first term ended. Smith said the choice to bring criminal charges against Trump was his alone, but added, "The basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions."
2:22

Newly released transcripts and videos show that former special counsel Jack Smith told lawmakers that the Jan. 6 riot, "does not happen without President Trump." That's from a closed-door hearing earlier this month with the House Judiciary Committee, where lawmakers grilled Smith for eight hours over two criminal investigations he launched into Trump. One focused on the president's role in trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election, while the other related to classified documents after Trump's first term ended. Smith said the choice to bring criminal charges against Trump was his alone, but added, "The basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions."

PBS News

85,881 views • 6 months ago

Toobin: It's not even news. Jack Smith cites these conversations in his report. So this is not like he was trying to keep keep this a secret. And remember what Smith was investigating. He was investigating Donald Trump's attempts to overturn the election through the use of fake electors in congress. He was lobbying members of congress to do just that
0:50

Toobin: It's not even news. Jack Smith cites these conversations in his report. So this is not like he was trying to keep keep this a secret. And remember what Smith was investigating. He was investigating Donald Trump's attempts to overturn the election through the use of fake electors in congress. He was lobbying members of congress to do just that

Acyn

177,353 views • 9 months ago

#BREAKING: Senators Grassley and Johnson announce Special Counsel Jack Smith tracked the communications of nearly a dozen Republican Senators Chuck Grassley: “I think [it] emphasizes the clinical weaponization that was behind all of this effort and we’re still getting more information.” Senator Ron Johnson: “This is outrageous what has happened...Representative Kelly, Senators Graham, Hagerty, Hawley, Sullivan, Tubberville, myself, Senator Lummis, and Blackburn. Now, this memo was dated September of 2023. Put it all in to context, Mar-a-Lago raid occurred in August of 2022. Jack Smith announced the indictments against President Trump in August of 2023. So, this is almost two months later they are casting this net, this fishing expedition against members of the Senate and House? I've been investigating this for Senator Grassley. This does not surprise me. But it should shock every American of what the Biden administration has done” SenBillHagerty: “This is an extraordinary revelation that took place this afternoon. My colleagues and I found out all of us Republicans, by the way, that we were placed under investigation by the FBI — under Joe Biden FBI that led I presume by Jack Smith and his predecessors. This is not the first time it is happened. Senator Johnson just mentioned this. I served on the Trump transition team in tower in 2016. Senator Blackburn was a vice chair of the transition committee. As we are probably a dozen or more members of congress. To think that we were all surveilled the back then by the Obama FBI, this corruption runs deep. And it’s gone on for far too long.” Sen. Marsha Blackburn: “The FBI under Joe Biden, and under Barack Obama, that they exercised activity that they had no authority to exercise. And as Senator Hagerty mentioned, we know what they did in 2016. The Trump transition team, and now we find out that after the Mar-a-Lago raid, after the indictment of President Trump, they surveil us. People who support President Trump. Members who are all Republicans but it shows you how out of control and rotten to the court, and politicized the FBI had become. And how they had absolutely no problem at all whatsoever with political weaponization”
5:14

#BREAKING: Senators Grassley and Johnson announce Special Counsel Jack Smith tracked the communications of nearly a dozen Republican Senators Chuck Grassley: “I think [it] emphasizes the clinical weaponization that was behind all of this effort and we’re still getting more information.” Senator Ron Johnson: “This is outrageous what has happened...Representative Kelly, Senators Graham, Hagerty, Hawley, Sullivan, Tubberville, myself, Senator Lummis, and Blackburn. Now, this memo was dated September of 2023. Put it all in to context, Mar-a-Lago raid occurred in August of 2022. Jack Smith announced the indictments against President Trump in August of 2023. So, this is almost two months later they are casting this net, this fishing expedition against members of the Senate and House? I've been investigating this for Senator Grassley. This does not surprise me. But it should shock every American of what the Biden administration has done” SenBillHagerty: “This is an extraordinary revelation that took place this afternoon. My colleagues and I found out all of us Republicans, by the way, that we were placed under investigation by the FBI — under Joe Biden FBI that led I presume by Jack Smith and his predecessors. This is not the first time it is happened. Senator Johnson just mentioned this. I served on the Trump transition team in tower in 2016. Senator Blackburn was a vice chair of the transition committee. As we are probably a dozen or more members of congress. To think that we were all surveilled the back then by the Obama FBI, this corruption runs deep. And it’s gone on for far too long.” Sen. Marsha Blackburn: “The FBI under Joe Biden, and under Barack Obama, that they exercised activity that they had no authority to exercise. And as Senator Hagerty mentioned, we know what they did in 2016. The Trump transition team, and now we find out that after the Mar-a-Lago raid, after the indictment of President Trump, they surveil us. People who support President Trump. Members who are all Republicans but it shows you how out of control and rotten to the court, and politicized the FBI had become. And how they had absolutely no problem at all whatsoever with political weaponization”

Curtis Houck

19,705 views • 9 months ago

Here is the clip with the transcript. What Peter says is clear: text messages including “pin it on the girl” were from “people inside the house” and from cops or related to the cops.” When The Megyn Kelly Show asks him “Oh, well, that sounds really bad. I actually hadn’t realized that there were EXPLICIT text messages saying, “We’re going to pin it on the girl.” That’s from cops?” Tragos didn’t clarify it was an interpretation of the messages, he clearly confirmed that the text message was “That's from the people inside the house. From people inside the house, inside 34 Fairview. Some of them are cops or related to cops.”
0:33

Here is the clip with the transcript. What Peter says is clear: text messages including “pin it on the girl” were from “people inside the house” and from cops or related to the cops.” When The Megyn Kelly Show asks him “Oh, well, that sounds really bad. I actually hadn’t realized that there were EXPLICIT text messages saying, “We’re going to pin it on the girl.” That’s from cops?” Tragos didn’t clarify it was an interpretation of the messages, he clearly confirmed that the text message was “That's from the people inside the house. From people inside the house, inside 34 Fairview. Some of them are cops or related to cops.”

Autumn 🍂❄️

35,748 views • 2 months ago

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”
0:36

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

The Bulwark

46,147 views • 5 months ago

Jonathan Turley DECIMATES Jack Smith, saying his record speaks for itself. "The problem with Smith is that his own record is the case against him. For example, when the hearing began someone asked him to respond to my criticism that he was stretching the law beyond the breaking point in case after case. And he just sort of shrugged and said he always respected the law. The record is the record. He was table secure unanimous decision against one of his most famous cases. The undoing of Jack Smith has always been his appetite. He has a serious problem with limitations and they undermine his case."
1:00

Jonathan Turley DECIMATES Jack Smith, saying his record speaks for itself. "The problem with Smith is that his own record is the case against him. For example, when the hearing began someone asked him to respond to my criticism that he was stretching the law beyond the breaking point in case after case. And he just sort of shrugged and said he always respected the law. The record is the record. He was table secure unanimous decision against one of his most famous cases. The undoing of Jack Smith has always been his appetite. He has a serious problem with limitations and they undermine his case."

DeVory Darkins

117,069 views • 5 months ago

.Real America's Voice (RAV)’s Brian Glenn: “Does the White House have a comment on a letter that was sent from Congressman Raskin to the DOJ alleging that the DOJ recklessly released damning information in regards to President Trump’s documents?” Karoline Leavitt Karoline Leavitt: “Yes, I saw that letter from Congressman Raskin this morning, who I would add, has zero credibility, and this letter was clearly a cheap political stunt. What the congressman did here, Brian, and for everyone in the room who’s hopefully not reporting on this as fact, is that he took untrue and salacious claims in a memo that was produced by Jack Smith, who has been completely discredited for his lawfare and his witch hunts against this President, and that information was unverified. It never even made it into the indictment because it was so unverified. And what happened to that indictment, anyway? It was thrown out. And Jack Smith has been proven again to be a prosecutor on a witch hunt against President Trump. He tried to throw him in jail ahead of the 2024 election. The Biden Department of Justice was fully on board with this lawfare campaign. And in fact, this story that was concocted by Congressman Raskin was so ridiculous I understand his communications team reached out to some outlets in this room who responsibly said, we’re not going to write this because this is just too much. However, of course, MS NOW did write that story this morning because they continue to be left wing propaganda for the Democrat Party. But I think Jack Smith has been proven to be a liar and a fraud. And this is, again, a cheap political stunt from a Democrat on Capitol Hill who I think wants to get himself on cable television.”
1:41

.Real America's Voice (RAV)’s Brian Glenn: “Does the White House have a comment on a letter that was sent from Congressman Raskin to the DOJ alleging that the DOJ recklessly released damning information in regards to President Trump’s documents?” Karoline Leavitt Karoline Leavitt: “Yes, I saw that letter from Congressman Raskin this morning, who I would add, has zero credibility, and this letter was clearly a cheap political stunt. What the congressman did here, Brian, and for everyone in the room who’s hopefully not reporting on this as fact, is that he took untrue and salacious claims in a memo that was produced by Jack Smith, who has been completely discredited for his lawfare and his witch hunts against this President, and that information was unverified. It never even made it into the indictment because it was so unverified. And what happened to that indictment, anyway? It was thrown out. And Jack Smith has been proven again to be a prosecutor on a witch hunt against President Trump. He tried to throw him in jail ahead of the 2024 election. The Biden Department of Justice was fully on board with this lawfare campaign. And in fact, this story that was concocted by Congressman Raskin was so ridiculous I understand his communications team reached out to some outlets in this room who responsibly said, we’re not going to write this because this is just too much. However, of course, MS NOW did write that story this morning because they continue to be left wing propaganda for the Democrat Party. But I think Jack Smith has been proven to be a liar and a fraud. And this is, again, a cheap political stunt from a Democrat on Capitol Hill who I think wants to get himself on cable television.”

Curtis Houck

217,085 views • 3 months ago