Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

OWLBEAR FROM THE TOP ROPE 800 DMG! Some asked so.... Crushing Flight = no fall dmg Stack boxes, climb, shapeshift, enlarge (jump spell if needed) 5005kg from 31.6m = 821 bludg dmg Just knowing weight/height fall dmg exists has creative implications, have fun with that😈

Ellohime

52,693 subscribers

369,264 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Ellohime

Ellohimevor 3 Jahren

Owlbears are for the skies.

Profilbild von Ellohime

Ellohimevor 3 Jahren

Also, god forbid it has a weakness to bludgeon dmg like some tough customers do *cough*

Profilbild von Cohh Carnage

Cohh Carnagevor 3 Jahren

Amazing.

Profilbild von Ellohime

Ellohimevor 3 Jahren

It’s a special game. Can’t wait to owlbear your ass in act 3..

Profilbild von Kris 'KTop'

Kris 'KTop'vor 3 Jahren

sorry, but had to make this edit with your clip heheh

Profilbild von Ellohime

Ellohimevor 3 Jahren

The superior version

Profilbild von 🧪Admiredplague🧬

🧪Admiredplague🧬vor 3 Jahren

How very D&D of you.

Profilbild von DansGaming

DansGamingvor 3 Jahren

This is so good 😅

Profilbild von Darren Summers

Darren Summersvor 3 Jahren

@CohhCarnage The fight mechanics in this game are A+!

Ähnliche Videos

Just got a comment on my latest video saying something about how it was hard for Agents like Evelyn to clear the new Shiyu Defense because it favors "front loaded DMG" and she "can't properly clear" due to it working against her nature of saving everything for the stun window. ... So I tested it. Again. Honestly, I'm convinced a lot of y'all are just parroting what we (CCs) say at this point and use it as your own validation without knowing the actual reasoning/testing behind the opinion. There's no shot in hell you guys are talking about front loaded DMG and who it prevents from clearing, then changing the goal post to anything else after random players show you otherwise. Evelyn is one of the strongest Agents to own in ZZZ because she's practically a baby Yixuan (neutral matchups across the board). Eve has front loaded, back loaded, & any other loaded DMG at her disposal. Your linear, one-track thinking is preventing most of you from being way better players than you believe. Most of y'all would curb stomp the game if you just tried instead of instantly quitting after the first couple fails. And before I get the usual crowd of 6th grade readers, I completely understand how some of these end game changes are affecting the players who are trying but don't know the method, or players who just straight up don't care and play what they want. I'm not talking about you with this tweet. lol This'll be the last time I take light jabs about the Shiyu Defense stuff until I release the guide (it's being edited now). I'm not bothered negatively, it's just a really weird brain scratch I'm trying to completely understand.

Just got a comment on my latest video saying something about how it was hard for Agents like Evelyn to clear the new Shiyu Defense because it favors "front loaded DMG" and she "can't properly clear" due to it working against her nature of saving everything for the stun window. ... So I tested it. Again. Honestly, I'm convinced a lot of y'all are just parroting what we (CCs) say at this point and use it as your own validation without knowing the actual reasoning/testing behind the opinion. There's no shot in hell you guys are talking about front loaded DMG and who it prevents from clearing, then changing the goal post to anything else after random players show you otherwise. Evelyn is one of the strongest Agents to own in ZZZ because she's practically a baby Yixuan (neutral matchups across the board). Eve has front loaded, back loaded, & any other loaded DMG at her disposal. Your linear, one-track thinking is preventing most of you from being way better players than you believe. Most of y'all would curb stomp the game if you just tried instead of instantly quitting after the first couple fails. And before I get the usual crowd of 6th grade readers, I completely understand how some of these end game changes are affecting the players who are trying but don't know the method, or players who just straight up don't care and play what they want. I'm not talking about you with this tweet. lol This'll be the last time I take light jabs about the Shiyu Defense stuff until I release the guide (it's being edited now). I'm not bothered negatively, it's just a really weird brain scratch I'm trying to completely understand.

Iyo

88,997 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Sad, #Kurdistan Region is suffering at the hands of the two Clans. Reporter asks him: What do you think of the youth in Kurdistan. He says: Children in Europe read books under a beautiful system, if the youth in my country read 60 books, the likes of the Clans couldn’t fool them. The youth of my country are like 50 years old without the 5, (meaning no life). Reporter asks: Why do you think that? He says: We’re stranded with these two Clans (Barzani-Talabani). There’s no salaries, there’s no schools, there’s no hospitals. There’s no life in this country. I’m confident this will breakdown. Reports says: I feel that our youth are without energy, they’re just sitting in cafes. He says: What youth? They have no money. They have no life. They have no education. They have no healthcare. Youthfulness is gone, it left, our youth are feeling hopeless. Reports asks: What do they need? He says: We need a hard change. Trees don’t fall with rocks. Trees don’t fall with pens. Trees fall with an ax. These people will fall with axes. They came down from the mountains with weapons, they have to be removed with weapons. Reporter asks: Is that a solution? Only the poor will suffer. He says: That is the only solution. If a family has 6, one can sacrifice so 5 can have a life filled with freedom. He says: I cry for the mothers who have martyrs who are without bread. I cry for the youth that have become refugees. I cry for the hospitals without medicine. I cry for this incompetent government. I cry for the schools without academics. I cry for Ocalan in prison, for Nawshirwan Mustafa (Late Gorran party leader), they have no more fear left, they move as they please, they gave up Kirkuk, Shingal, they hold a referendum, what haven’t they done to this nation? Sari Rash (translated Black Head, referring to where Masoud Barzani lives now, a tourist area, former Saddam’s palace) has made all our heads white. Our government is two mafias, the nation has had enough of you, in Erbil you kick teachers, our teachers are tired of life, our youth are leaving us for Europe.

Sad, #Kurdistan Region is suffering at the hands of the two Clans. Reporter asks him: What do you think of the youth in Kurdistan. He says: Children in Europe read books under a beautiful system, if the youth in my country read 60 books, the likes of the Clans couldn’t fool them. The youth of my country are like 50 years old without the 5, (meaning no life). Reporter asks: Why do you think that? He says: We’re stranded with these two Clans (Barzani-Talabani). There’s no salaries, there’s no schools, there’s no hospitals. There’s no life in this country. I’m confident this will breakdown. Reports says: I feel that our youth are without energy, they’re just sitting in cafes. He says: What youth? They have no money. They have no life. They have no education. They have no healthcare. Youthfulness is gone, it left, our youth are feeling hopeless. Reports asks: What do they need? He says: We need a hard change. Trees don’t fall with rocks. Trees don’t fall with pens. Trees fall with an ax. These people will fall with axes. They came down from the mountains with weapons, they have to be removed with weapons. Reporter asks: Is that a solution? Only the poor will suffer. He says: That is the only solution. If a family has 6, one can sacrifice so 5 can have a life filled with freedom. He says: I cry for the mothers who have martyrs who are without bread. I cry for the youth that have become refugees. I cry for the hospitals without medicine. I cry for this incompetent government. I cry for the schools without academics. I cry for Ocalan in prison, for Nawshirwan Mustafa (Late Gorran party leader), they have no more fear left, they move as they please, they gave up Kirkuk, Shingal, they hold a referendum, what haven’t they done to this nation? Sari Rash (translated Black Head, referring to where Masoud Barzani lives now, a tourist area, former Saddam’s palace) has made all our heads white. Our government is two mafias, the nation has had enough of you, in Erbil you kick teachers, our teachers are tired of life, our youth are leaving us for Europe.

Diliman Abdulkader

42,348 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This happened on United Flight 1161 from Fort Lauderdale to Newark a couple of days ago. This lady asked this guy if he could stop talking so loudly. He was speaking to someone on his phone and had them on speakerphone. This was prior to takeoff. As you can see he didn’t like that and starts to cuss at her and hurl insults at her making fun of her weight all the while remaining loud where the passengers around him could hear everything. She kept her cool and controlled herself. The crew was notified and they moved her to an upgraded seat. Some said she should have never addressed another passenger onboard. If there is an issue, ring the call button immediately and alert a flight attendant to avoid escalation. There is so much wrong with all this. One, it is never okay to be talking on the phone on a plane surrounded by people. That’s just rude. Have some common sense. Two, not one man around her said anything? Didn’t stick up for her or the rest of the people on the flight having to listen to this? Three, there is a kid right there listening to all this. And finally, United offered just to move her? They should’ve kicked him off. He’s acting aggressive towards another passenger before takeoff over a minor thing. What happens if it continues with other passengers once they’re in the air? Proves he cannot control his emotions so that makes everyone unsafe, especially in the air. 💯 Do better United! IMHO. What is your take? Was she to blame for asking him to be more quiet? Or, was he out of control? Do you think moving her was enough or should they have removed him from the flight?

This happened on United Flight 1161 from Fort Lauderdale to Newark a couple of days ago. This lady asked this guy if he could stop talking so loudly. He was speaking to someone on his phone and had them on speakerphone. This was prior to takeoff. As you can see he didn’t like that and starts to cuss at her and hurl insults at her making fun of her weight all the while remaining loud where the passengers around him could hear everything. She kept her cool and controlled herself. The crew was notified and they moved her to an upgraded seat. Some said she should have never addressed another passenger onboard. If there is an issue, ring the call button immediately and alert a flight attendant to avoid escalation. There is so much wrong with all this. One, it is never okay to be talking on the phone on a plane surrounded by people. That’s just rude. Have some common sense. Two, not one man around her said anything? Didn’t stick up for her or the rest of the people on the flight having to listen to this? Three, there is a kid right there listening to all this. And finally, United offered just to move her? They should’ve kicked him off. He’s acting aggressive towards another passenger before takeoff over a minor thing. What happens if it continues with other passengers once they’re in the air? Proves he cannot control his emotions so that makes everyone unsafe, especially in the air. 💯 Do better United! IMHO. What is your take? Was she to blame for asking him to be more quiet? Or, was he out of control? Do you think moving her was enough or should they have removed him from the flight?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,619,082 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🐰: i went to see ‘hope’ by myself, and i happened to run into a few fans on the way out. 🐰: i took some pictures with them. and i mean,, taking photos with people is totally fine. i have no problem with that! 🐰: but, i had gone into a bakery to buy some bread, and all of a sudden there was someone standing right in front of me with a camera pointed at me like this… 🐰: i don’t really think that’s very respectful. 🐰: i don’t care how old you are or where you’re from… just sticking a camera in someone’s face like that… i felt that was kind of rude. so, if this somehow reaches that person… 🐰: you know, the other fans asked if it was okay to take a picture first. i happily took photos with them, and i enjoyed my bread and coffee and went home 🐰: anyway, ‘hope’ was really fun. i really enjoyed it.

🐰: i went to see ‘hope’ by myself, and i happened to run into a few fans on the way out. 🐰: i took some pictures with them. and i mean,, taking photos with people is totally fine. i have no problem with that! 🐰: but, i had gone into a bakery to buy some bread, and all of a sudden there was someone standing right in front of me with a camera pointed at me like this… 🐰: i don’t really think that’s very respectful. 🐰: i don’t care how old you are or where you’re from… just sticking a camera in someone’s face like that… i felt that was kind of rude. so, if this somehow reaches that person… 🐰: you know, the other fans asked if it was okay to take a picture first. i happily took photos with them, and i enjoyed my bread and coffee and went home 🐰: anyway, ‘hope’ was really fun. i really enjoyed it.

jungkook admirer

737,158 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

🚨⚖️ BREAKING COURT UPDATE Nicki Minaj has satisfied the judgment. As a result, no further hearing is required and the matter has officially been resolved. 📰 Heavy media presence at the courthouse today, with multiple outlets in attendance including TMZ. 🎤 Attorney Paul Saso addressed reporters following the judgment, offering some snarky remarks when asked “if he had some words for Nicki Minaj” “Today we informed the court that Nicki Minaj has satisfied the judgment, so there was no need to proceed further with our motion to authorize the sale of her house to satisfy it.” When asked how his client felt: “He’s incredibly gratified and happy. It’s been a long time coming to finally have justice done. He suffered a heinous attack years ago, and it took years to obtain the judgment then nearly two more years to enforce it. We never imagined it would go this far, to the point of placing a levy on a multi millionaire’s home.” Saso confirmed the agreement came together within the last 24 hours, stating: “I’ve spoken with her counsel over the last several months, but it was just yesterday that an agreement was reached for her to satisfy the judgment.” When asked if he had any words for Nicki Minaj, Saso added: “I haven’t spoken to her directly. My hope is that this case represents a transition from avoiding responsibility to taking responsibility, and from violence to peace.”

🚨⚖️ BREAKING COURT UPDATE Nicki Minaj has satisfied the judgment. As a result, no further hearing is required and the matter has officially been resolved. 📰 Heavy media presence at the courthouse today, with multiple outlets in attendance including TMZ. 🎤 Attorney Paul Saso addressed reporters following the judgment, offering some snarky remarks when asked “if he had some words for Nicki Minaj” “Today we informed the court that Nicki Minaj has satisfied the judgment, so there was no need to proceed further with our motion to authorize the sale of her house to satisfy it.” When asked how his client felt: “He’s incredibly gratified and happy. It’s been a long time coming to finally have justice done. He suffered a heinous attack years ago, and it took years to obtain the judgment then nearly two more years to enforce it. We never imagined it would go this far, to the point of placing a levy on a multi millionaire’s home.” Saso confirmed the agreement came together within the last 24 hours, stating: “I’ve spoken with her counsel over the last several months, but it was just yesterday that an agreement was reached for her to satisfy the judgment.” When asked if he had any words for Nicki Minaj, Saso added: “I haven’t spoken to her directly. My hope is that this case represents a transition from avoiding responsibility to taking responsibility, and from violence to peace.”

Cousin Tino ™️

68,239 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Back from Goyang and here are some notes: 1. I sat in the 200-level for 1 day and on the floor for two days. With this stage, for me, the best view is not from the floor seats. 2. Not sure if I regret not having many videos or fancams. In those days, I wasn't interested in filming and just wanted to absorb everything, every detail of their performance. As they kept saying, “I need the whole stadium to jump. Put your phone down, let's get all the fun!” When it's your time, do it and have fun. 3. The rain was so bad, but it was iconic, and the tannies looked amazing in the rain. Our dedication was intact, and we gave everything to cheer the tannies. It was my favorite day. It was chaotic, and everyone was just happy, even with the cold and the relentless rain. 4. The best merch for me is the red tote. I used it as my bag going home with two laptops, pants, and other stuff, and it's pretty and roomy! Get it! 5. It's only now I'm getting to read comments from the show because when you're there, it's hectic and you don't have time. All I can say is that the concert may not be perfect, but it's perfect for me. The happiness and joy it brought are priceless, and no negativity can tarnish them. So ignore them. They are just jealous that the tannies love us and were happy. Have so much fun with the tour. Savor it. Don't stop supporting their music. 💜 방탄소년단

Back from Goyang and here are some notes: 1. I sat in the 200-level for 1 day and on the floor for two days. With this stage, for me, the best view is not from the floor seats. 2. Not sure if I regret not having many videos or fancams. In those days, I wasn't interested in filming and just wanted to absorb everything, every detail of their performance. As they kept saying, “I need the whole stadium to jump. Put your phone down, let's get all the fun!” When it's your time, do it and have fun. 3. The rain was so bad, but it was iconic, and the tannies looked amazing in the rain. Our dedication was intact, and we gave everything to cheer the tannies. It was my favorite day. It was chaotic, and everyone was just happy, even with the cold and the relentless rain. 4. The best merch for me is the red tote. I used it as my bag going home with two laptops, pants, and other stuff, and it's pretty and roomy! Get it! 5. It's only now I'm getting to read comments from the show because when you're there, it's hectic and you don't have time. All I can say is that the concert may not be perfect, but it's perfect for me. The happiness and joy it brought are priceless, and no negativity can tarnish them. So ignore them. They are just jealous that the tannies love us and were happy. Have so much fun with the tour. Savor it. Don't stop supporting their music. 💜 방탄소년단

MinYoonKer:⊙⊝⊜

36,189 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Midl's Bitcoin Ecosystem Bootstrapping Program is Live Imagine you have a time travel machine. You gently set it to the fall of 2018, witness the birth of Uniswap and ETH still sitting at some humble $100. Now imagine you get the opportunity to commit liquidity to Uniswap to generate future UNI yield from it. And earn ETH on top of that. And it gets better: you’re still not sure if it will skyrocket and you want to play safe. Good news: you don’t have to provide actual liquidity right away, just your wallet balance as an ID. But keep in mind, you’re dealing with groundbreaking pioneers. That’s exactly what the Bootstrapping Program is about. We kill two birds with one stone: giving builders the opportunity to launch with strength, and giving early supporters a chance to earn without overcommitting to build an ecosystem that lasts. With no risks, and no lock-ins till mainnet: generate Midl token rewards and get exposure to the projects that are now building the future of BTCFi with. Soft Staking Explained The Program functions in a soft staking manner. Meaning, you don’t have to put actual assets into the protocol at the spot. See it as a balance snapshot: you enroll via a signature, not an actual staking tx. Rewards accrual depends on that. Use multiple tokens: BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC or even WBTC to finally take it out from Ethereum and bring it to where it belongs. So I get free Midl tokens? Well, not really. After the mainnet launch you’ll have to provide the desired liquidity to the project. Till that moment the funds stay with you. Free will establishment here: if you decide to withdraw from the campaign, you are free to do it anytime. Liquidity Part If you are thinking of asking “With 2T+ locked in there, isn’t it enough to feed everyone?”. Here's the deal: Yes, Bitcoin has enormous liquidity, but it can’t be untapped natively. For now. That brings us back to the chicken and egg question: Midl’s grand aim is to make this liquidity work which could only be done if more builders come to play. And that’s EXACTLY who you are supporting through the Bootstrapping Program. We give you a chance to unlock Bitcoin's potential by helping out teams with the right vision of market demands and improvements needed to be done pre-launch. And that’s how we unlock the existing trillions. Sure, you can just go around, ape into some project that is built on top of the chain that is built on top of another chain, fall into the vicious cycle of competing with farming bots and listening to projects telling you the airdrop was fair (if you like to suffer). We are not keen on doing that. Feel free to check out the secondary TVL of Layer 2s with the Bitcoin’s. And we haven't even plugged in the real DeFi part yet. You contribute = you get transparent reward accrual and real incentive. No additional layers and no guessing whether you’ll be rewarded or not. Contribute directly to Bitcoin, the most trustworthy chain out there.

Midl's Bitcoin Ecosystem Bootstrapping Program is Live Imagine you have a time travel machine. You gently set it to the fall of 2018, witness the birth of Uniswap and ETH still sitting at some humble $100. Now imagine you get the opportunity to commit liquidity to Uniswap to generate future UNI yield from it. And earn ETH on top of that. And it gets better: you’re still not sure if it will skyrocket and you want to play safe. Good news: you don’t have to provide actual liquidity right away, just your wallet balance as an ID. But keep in mind, you’re dealing with groundbreaking pioneers. That’s exactly what the Bootstrapping Program is about. We kill two birds with one stone: giving builders the opportunity to launch with strength, and giving early supporters a chance to earn without overcommitting to build an ecosystem that lasts. With no risks, and no lock-ins till mainnet: generate Midl token rewards and get exposure to the projects that are now building the future of BTCFi with. Soft Staking Explained The Program functions in a soft staking manner. Meaning, you don’t have to put actual assets into the protocol at the spot. See it as a balance snapshot: you enroll via a signature, not an actual staking tx. Rewards accrual depends on that. Use multiple tokens: BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC or even WBTC to finally take it out from Ethereum and bring it to where it belongs. So I get free Midl tokens? Well, not really. After the mainnet launch you’ll have to provide the desired liquidity to the project. Till that moment the funds stay with you. Free will establishment here: if you decide to withdraw from the campaign, you are free to do it anytime. Liquidity Part If you are thinking of asking “With 2T+ locked in there, isn’t it enough to feed everyone?”. Here's the deal: Yes, Bitcoin has enormous liquidity, but it can’t be untapped natively. For now. That brings us back to the chicken and egg question: Midl’s grand aim is to make this liquidity work which could only be done if more builders come to play. And that’s EXACTLY who you are supporting through the Bootstrapping Program. We give you a chance to unlock Bitcoin's potential by helping out teams with the right vision of market demands and improvements needed to be done pre-launch. And that’s how we unlock the existing trillions. Sure, you can just go around, ape into some project that is built on top of the chain that is built on top of another chain, fall into the vicious cycle of competing with farming bots and listening to projects telling you the airdrop was fair (if you like to suffer). We are not keen on doing that. Feel free to check out the secondary TVL of Layer 2s with the Bitcoin’s. And we haven't even plugged in the real DeFi part yet. You contribute = you get transparent reward accrual and real incentive. No additional layers and no guessing whether you’ll be rewarded or not. Contribute directly to Bitcoin, the most trustworthy chain out there.

Midl

30,902 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Dwarkesh asks Dario a fantastic question relating to how he is so bullish on AGI yet so conservative on data center build out - Dario has an amazing take on this: Dario Amodei details the staggering financial risk of the AI race, explaining that if growth continues at 10x a year, a company could be looking at a $1 trillion revenue run rate by the end of 2027. He notes that to support this, a firm might buy $5 trillion worth of compute. However, he highlights a "ruinous" dilemma: if that revenue is even slightly lower than projected. specifically if it comes in at $800 billion instead of $1 trillion the company would collapse. He explains that if you are off by just a year or if the growth rate drops to 5x, "there's no force on earth, there's no hedge on earth, that could stop me from going bankrupt" after committing to that level of spend. Because of this, Amodei argues that "behaving responsibly" means not just "yoloing" hundreds of billions of dollars. He suggests that some competitors may not have "written down the spreadsheet" and don't fully grasp the existential risks they are taking with these massive, unhedged bets on infrastructure.

Dwarkesh asks Dario a fantastic question relating to how he is so bullish on AGI yet so conservative on data center build out - Dario has an amazing take on this: Dario Amodei details the staggering financial risk of the AI race, explaining that if growth continues at 10x a year, a company could be looking at a $1 trillion revenue run rate by the end of 2027. He notes that to support this, a firm might buy $5 trillion worth of compute. However, he highlights a "ruinous" dilemma: if that revenue is even slightly lower than projected. specifically if it comes in at $800 billion instead of $1 trillion the company would collapse. He explains that if you are off by just a year or if the growth rate drops to 5x, "there's no force on earth, there's no hedge on earth, that could stop me from going bankrupt" after committing to that level of spend. Because of this, Amodei argues that "behaving responsibly" means not just "yoloing" hundreds of billions of dollars. He suggests that some competitors may not have "written down the spreadsheet" and don't fully grasp the existential risks they are taking with these massive, unhedged bets on infrastructure.

Chris

1,049,043 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Lewis is so open here, please please give it a listen, so generous of him to share this with us and so inspiring 🥺 "When I'm at the racetrack, I'm in an environment where you have to be really guarded and protected. And then in my personal life, I mean, you can have lots of fun and be very creative and interact with people in a different way." "But I think it's really important to be happy and in a good place, away from the tracks. Then you arrive in a good place. If you're unhappy when you're away from it, you're often unhappy at the races." "So there's things that I've learned away from the track, from like social media, from podcasts, like breathing exercises, just about how to take care of yourself. Because these are not things that I was taught at school. I don't think there's actually anything that I learned at school that has benefited me. That I can apply. There was literally nothing that, and I think that's ultimately probably a problem with some of the education system. It doesn't necessarily prepare you for life, in terms of how to handle the mental pressures." "You know, mental health is such a huge issue around the world. And I, for one, also have been massively challenged in that area." "So learning new tools along the way, away from the race, has enabled me to arrive better prepared, better equipped, more able to deal with the pressures, the incoming assault or negativity. And then turning that into positivity and channeling that into something that I love, into racing." "Having something to be able to focus on, that's the privilege, that's how lucky I am to be racing. I think everyone needs to find a balance in life. But if you can find something that you're passionate about, take all this energy and focus onto something, it could be boxing, it could be, it could be a sport, it could be what you're studying. I think that's what we need to encourage lots of kids to be doing."

Lewis is so open here, please please give it a listen, so generous of him to share this with us and so inspiring 🥺 "When I'm at the racetrack, I'm in an environment where you have to be really guarded and protected. And then in my personal life, I mean, you can have lots of fun and be very creative and interact with people in a different way." "But I think it's really important to be happy and in a good place, away from the tracks. Then you arrive in a good place. If you're unhappy when you're away from it, you're often unhappy at the races." "So there's things that I've learned away from the track, from like social media, from podcasts, like breathing exercises, just about how to take care of yourself. Because these are not things that I was taught at school. I don't think there's actually anything that I learned at school that has benefited me. That I can apply. There was literally nothing that, and I think that's ultimately probably a problem with some of the education system. It doesn't necessarily prepare you for life, in terms of how to handle the mental pressures." "You know, mental health is such a huge issue around the world. And I, for one, also have been massively challenged in that area." "So learning new tools along the way, away from the race, has enabled me to arrive better prepared, better equipped, more able to deal with the pressures, the incoming assault or negativity. And then turning that into positivity and channeling that into something that I love, into racing." "Having something to be able to focus on, that's the privilege, that's how lucky I am to be racing. I think everyone needs to find a balance in life. But if you can find something that you're passionate about, take all this energy and focus onto something, it could be boxing, it could be, it could be a sport, it could be what you're studying. I think that's what we need to encourage lots of kids to be doing."

sim

26,076 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Yann LeCun just told the most well-funded industry in human history it is solving the wrong problem. LeCun: “Babies learn this around the age of eight or nine months, that objects don’t float, they fall.” No dataset. No labels. No reward signal. A nine month old drops a spoon and builds a physics engine no machine can match. LeCun: “Most of us can learn to drive in about 20 or 30 hours of training without ever crashing, causing any accident.” Twenty hours. Tesla has built the most capable driving system on the road. It took billions of miles of data to get there. A sixteen year old gets there over a long weekend. Not because the teenager is the better driver. Because the teenager is not learning to drive. They are deploying a model of reality they have been building since birth. LeCun: “If we drive next to a cliff, we know that if we turn the wheel to the right, the car is going to run off the cliff and nothing good is going to come out of this.” You simulate the crash. You see the wreckage. You feel the fall. You turn the wheel. None of it was real. All of it was intelligence. Every AI has to crash a thousand times to learn what you imagined once and never did. That is not a performance gap. That is an architecture gap. LeCun: “The main problem we need to solve is how do we learn models of the world.” Not bigger models. Not more compute. Not another trillion tokens. World models. A machine that can run reality forward before it acts. The industry is scaling language. LeCun says language is a compression of thought. Not thought itself. You understood gravity before you could say the word. You grasped cause and effect before your first sentence. The deepest intelligence you will ever possess was built in total silence. And every lab on Earth is trying to reconstruct the mind from words alone. Physics does not care about your context window. A baby who learns that cups fall in a kitchen already knows that rocks fall off cliffs. No retraining. No fine-tuning. One model. Every environment. That is what intelligence actually is. Not prediction. Not pattern matching. Not scale. A simulation of reality so precise you rehearse the future before it exists. Every infant on Earth builds one. No machine ever has.

Yann LeCun just told the most well-funded industry in human history it is solving the wrong problem. LeCun: “Babies learn this around the age of eight or nine months, that objects don’t float, they fall.” No dataset. No labels. No reward signal. A nine month old drops a spoon and builds a physics engine no machine can match. LeCun: “Most of us can learn to drive in about 20 or 30 hours of training without ever crashing, causing any accident.” Twenty hours. Tesla has built the most capable driving system on the road. It took billions of miles of data to get there. A sixteen year old gets there over a long weekend. Not because the teenager is the better driver. Because the teenager is not learning to drive. They are deploying a model of reality they have been building since birth. LeCun: “If we drive next to a cliff, we know that if we turn the wheel to the right, the car is going to run off the cliff and nothing good is going to come out of this.” You simulate the crash. You see the wreckage. You feel the fall. You turn the wheel. None of it was real. All of it was intelligence. Every AI has to crash a thousand times to learn what you imagined once and never did. That is not a performance gap. That is an architecture gap. LeCun: “The main problem we need to solve is how do we learn models of the world.” Not bigger models. Not more compute. Not another trillion tokens. World models. A machine that can run reality forward before it acts. The industry is scaling language. LeCun says language is a compression of thought. Not thought itself. You understood gravity before you could say the word. You grasped cause and effect before your first sentence. The deepest intelligence you will ever possess was built in total silence. And every lab on Earth is trying to reconstruct the mind from words alone. Physics does not care about your context window. A baby who learns that cups fall in a kitchen already knows that rocks fall off cliffs. No retraining. No fine-tuning. One model. Every environment. That is what intelligence actually is. Not prediction. Not pattern matching. Not scale. A simulation of reality so precise you rehearse the future before it exists. Every infant on Earth builds one. No machine ever has.

Dustin

121,684 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

At this time some astrologers came forward & denounced the Jews. They said to King Nebuchadnezzar, “May the king live forever! Your Majesty has issued a decree that everyone who hears the sound of the horn, flute, zither, lyre, harp, pipe & all kinds of music must fall down & worship the image of gold, & that whoever does not fall down & worship will be thrown into a blazing furnace. But there are some Jews whom you have set over the affairs of the province of Babylon—Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego—who pay no attention to you, Your Majesty. They neither serve your gods nor worship the image of gold you have set up.” Furious with rage, Nebuchadnezzar summoned Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego. So these men were brought before the king, & Nebuchadnezzar said to them, “Is it true, Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego, that you do not serve my gods or worship the image of gold I have set up? Now when you hear the sound of the horn, flute, zither, lyre, harp, pipe & all kinds of music, if you are ready to fall down & worship the image I made, very good. But if you do not worship it, you will be thrown immediately into a blazing furnace. Then what god will be able to rescue you from my hand?” Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego replied to him, “King Nebuchadnezzar, we do not need to defend ourselves before you in this matter. If we are thrown into the blazing furnace, the God we serve is able to deliver us from it, & he will deliver us from Your Majesty’s hand. But even if he does not, we want you to know, Your Majesty, that we will not serve your gods or worship the image of gold you have set up.” Then Nebuchadnezzar was furious with Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego, & his attitude toward them changed. He ordered the furnace heated seven times hotter than usual & commanded some of the strongest soldiers in his army to tie up Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego & throw them into the blazing furnace. So these men, wearing their robes, trousers, turbans & other clothes, were bound & thrown into the blazing furnace. The king’s command was so urgent & the furnace so hot that the flames of the fire killed the soldiers who took up Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego, & these three men, firmly tied, fell into the blazing furnace. Then King Nebuchadnezzar leaped to his feet in amazement & asked his advisers, “Weren’t there three men that we tied up & threw into the fire?” They replied, “Certainly, Your Majesty.” He said, “Look! I see four men walking around in the fire, unbound & unharmed, & the fourth looks like a son of the gods.” [Daniel 3:8-25 NIV] (Sidenote: I prefer KJV, but most seem to prefer NIV.) Surrender. Pray. Win.

At this time some astrologers came forward & denounced the Jews. They said to King Nebuchadnezzar, “May the king live forever! Your Majesty has issued a decree that everyone who hears the sound of the horn, flute, zither, lyre, harp, pipe & all kinds of music must fall down & worship the image of gold, & that whoever does not fall down & worship will be thrown into a blazing furnace. But there are some Jews whom you have set over the affairs of the province of Babylon—Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego—who pay no attention to you, Your Majesty. They neither serve your gods nor worship the image of gold you have set up.” Furious with rage, Nebuchadnezzar summoned Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego. So these men were brought before the king, & Nebuchadnezzar said to them, “Is it true, Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego, that you do not serve my gods or worship the image of gold I have set up? Now when you hear the sound of the horn, flute, zither, lyre, harp, pipe & all kinds of music, if you are ready to fall down & worship the image I made, very good. But if you do not worship it, you will be thrown immediately into a blazing furnace. Then what god will be able to rescue you from my hand?” Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego replied to him, “King Nebuchadnezzar, we do not need to defend ourselves before you in this matter. If we are thrown into the blazing furnace, the God we serve is able to deliver us from it, & he will deliver us from Your Majesty’s hand. But even if he does not, we want you to know, Your Majesty, that we will not serve your gods or worship the image of gold you have set up.” Then Nebuchadnezzar was furious with Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego, & his attitude toward them changed. He ordered the furnace heated seven times hotter than usual & commanded some of the strongest soldiers in his army to tie up Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego & throw them into the blazing furnace. So these men, wearing their robes, trousers, turbans & other clothes, were bound & thrown into the blazing furnace. The king’s command was so urgent & the furnace so hot that the flames of the fire killed the soldiers who took up Shadrach, Meshach & Abednego, & these three men, firmly tied, fell into the blazing furnace. Then King Nebuchadnezzar leaped to his feet in amazement & asked his advisers, “Weren’t there three men that we tied up & threw into the fire?” They replied, “Certainly, Your Majesty.” He said, “Look! I see four men walking around in the fire, unbound & unharmed, & the fourth looks like a son of the gods.” [Daniel 3:8-25 NIV] (Sidenote: I prefer KJV, but most seem to prefer NIV.) Surrender. Pray. Win.

J∅kër Kîng 👑

45,716 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

WOW 🚨 Big Food found a loophole to still use toxic ingredients but not have to list them in the ingredients list This means we are buying items we think have certain things we’re watching for removed but they really aren’t Since most of us are getting better at reading the back of the box, big food has moved a lot of chemicals from the ingredient list to the processing list “Under FDA regulations, if a substance is used during the manufacturing of a food but is removed in some manner, it's classified as a processing aid. Processing aids fall under the incidental additive rule, which exempts very real and present chemicals from being disclosed on the ingredient label” This is FDA rules (21 CFR 101.100) that exempt certain substances from the ingredient list. These include processing aids and substances added during manufacturing but removed before final packaging or present at insignificant levels with no functional effect in the finished food. They fall under “incidental additives.” Here’s a simple example - Vanilla beans are crushed. - A chemical solvent (like hexane or ethanol) soaks them to pull out the flavor compounds. - The solvent is mostly removed with heat and vacuum (processing aid). - What’s left is the extract that goes into your ice cream, yogurt, or baked goods So what they’re saying is, because those chemicals should be mostly removed during the processing part, then they don’t need to be listed at all on the ingredients This is so deceptive because there are still trace amounts of those chemicals in the product

WOW 🚨 Big Food found a loophole to still use toxic ingredients but not have to list them in the ingredients list This means we are buying items we think have certain things we’re watching for removed but they really aren’t Since most of us are getting better at reading the back of the box, big food has moved a lot of chemicals from the ingredient list to the processing list “Under FDA regulations, if a substance is used during the manufacturing of a food but is removed in some manner, it's classified as a processing aid. Processing aids fall under the incidental additive rule, which exempts very real and present chemicals from being disclosed on the ingredient label” This is FDA rules (21 CFR 101.100) that exempt certain substances from the ingredient list. These include processing aids and substances added during manufacturing but removed before final packaging or present at insignificant levels with no functional effect in the finished food. They fall under “incidental additives.” Here’s a simple example - Vanilla beans are crushed. - A chemical solvent (like hexane or ethanol) soaks them to pull out the flavor compounds. - The solvent is mostly removed with heat and vacuum (processing aid). - What’s left is the extract that goes into your ice cream, yogurt, or baked goods So what they’re saying is, because those chemicals should be mostly removed during the processing part, then they don’t need to be listed at all on the ingredients This is so deceptive because there are still trace amounts of those chemicals in the product

Wall Street Apes

41,323 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Trump: So I said, let me ask you a question and he said, nobody ever asked this question and it must be because of MIT, my relationship to MIT. Very smart. He goes, I say, what would happen if the boat sank from its weight? And you're in the boat and you have this tremendously powerful battery and the battery is now underwater and there's a shark that's approximately 10 yards over there, by the way, a lot of shark attacks lately, do you notice that a lot of shark? I watched some guys justifying it today. Well, they weren't really that angry. They bit off the young lady's leg because of the fact that they were, they were not hungry, but they misunderstood what who she was? These people are. He said there's no problem with sharks. They just didn't really understand a young woman swimming now. It really got decimated and other people do a lot of shark attacks. So I said, so there's a shark 10 yards away from the boat, 10 yards or here, do I get electrocuted if the boat is sinking? Water goes over the battery, the boat is sinking. Do I stay on top of the boat and get electrocuted or do I jump over by the shark and not get electrocuted? Because I will tell you he didn't know the answer. He said, you know, nobody's ever asked me that question. I said, I think it's a good question. I think there's a lot of electric current coming through that water. But you know what I'd do if there was a shark or you get electrocuted, I'll take electrocution every single time

Trump: So I said, let me ask you a question and he said, nobody ever asked this question and it must be because of MIT, my relationship to MIT. Very smart. He goes, I say, what would happen if the boat sank from its weight? And you're in the boat and you have this tremendously powerful battery and the battery is now underwater and there's a shark that's approximately 10 yards over there, by the way, a lot of shark attacks lately, do you notice that a lot of shark? I watched some guys justifying it today. Well, they weren't really that angry. They bit off the young lady's leg because of the fact that they were, they were not hungry, but they misunderstood what who she was? These people are. He said there's no problem with sharks. They just didn't really understand a young woman swimming now. It really got decimated and other people do a lot of shark attacks. So I said, so there's a shark 10 yards away from the boat, 10 yards or here, do I get electrocuted if the boat is sinking? Water goes over the battery, the boat is sinking. Do I stay on top of the boat and get electrocuted or do I jump over by the shark and not get electrocuted? Because I will tell you he didn't know the answer. He said, you know, nobody's ever asked me that question. I said, I think it's a good question. I think there's a lot of electric current coming through that water. But you know what I'd do if there was a shark or you get electrocuted, I'll take electrocution every single time

Headquarters

4,509,859 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The BBC ran schools gender guidance as second story, with the Education Editor, Branwen Jeffreys, on national bulletin at Six. Quite something. Ending the Identity Hub’s gatekeeping of this issue was a very good move. It’s very assured but it needed a balancing quote from a concerned safeguarding group. The residual issue, which is actually a huge problem across the board, and not particular to the BBC, is that the guidance, like the Cass Review, and Pathways puberty blocker research, and almost all media coverage, is predicated on the existence of ‘true trans’. That is, the belief that some children really are born in the wrong body, or have an opposite sex brain. If you believe this [necessarily untrue] claim, then naturally you will assume a small number of children do need to be socially and medically transitioned, it’s just that we need to be careful about which ones. And that creates loopholes, which researchers who’ve followed it for years know will be exploited. For example - the ‘vast majority’ of children can’t transition at school without parents knowing - so that means some schools can help a child secretly transition. Boys can/should be banned from girls sport ‘when it’s safer’ - so some boys can be in a girls category. It’s as if the problem for the last 15 years is that too many children were wrongly thought to be in the wrong body, instead of a global failure to understand that no one is, at all. It looks like this has been settled on as a compromise position for now, for the sake of neutrality. But if we have to set that aside, this was assured and fair content.

The BBC ran schools gender guidance as second story, with the Education Editor, Branwen Jeffreys, on national bulletin at Six. Quite something. Ending the Identity Hub’s gatekeeping of this issue was a very good move. It’s very assured but it needed a balancing quote from a concerned safeguarding group. The residual issue, which is actually a huge problem across the board, and not particular to the BBC, is that the guidance, like the Cass Review, and Pathways puberty blocker research, and almost all media coverage, is predicated on the existence of ‘true trans’. That is, the belief that some children really are born in the wrong body, or have an opposite sex brain. If you believe this [necessarily untrue] claim, then naturally you will assume a small number of children do need to be socially and medically transitioned, it’s just that we need to be careful about which ones. And that creates loopholes, which researchers who’ve followed it for years know will be exploited. For example - the ‘vast majority’ of children can’t transition at school without parents knowing - so that means some schools can help a child secretly transition. Boys can/should be banned from girls sport ‘when it’s safer’ - so some boys can be in a girls category. It’s as if the problem for the last 15 years is that too many children were wrongly thought to be in the wrong body, instead of a global failure to understand that no one is, at all. It looks like this has been settled on as a compromise position for now, for the sake of neutrality. But if we have to set that aside, this was assured and fair content.

SEEN in Journalism

19,262 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Really nice visual on what a week should cover from a strength, power & speed POV. Sprint every week, maybe twice. One massive issue in Gaelic Games now is too much weightlifting and bodybuilding. So you have lads walking around 5-8kg above the weight their top speed is and it also limits the amount of repeat runs they can make. This issue is about to explode into an even greater one. Mindless when play a sport (Gaelic Football) that next year could ask in some players 15-30% more running than last season!! We are heading for an injury epidemic like no other if teams don’t prepare properly going forward. Some of the stuff I’m hearing from Senior Club and Inter County teams around the country already is mind bending stupidity. One leading “manager” (in inverted commas ‘cos hardly deserves the title) has completely ignored the protests of the S&C Coach in the demands of training and running said manager wants to do. Supposedly the highest level of the game. Paid professional ignored. Don’t think this isn’t common. We have to get to the needed KM’s, sprints, High speed runs and all that. But if we do it overweight and too fast we are absolutely going to break down. It’s physics folks, and some of these geniuses don’t believe in it. Credit: Hansen Athletics

Really nice visual on what a week should cover from a strength, power & speed POV. Sprint every week, maybe twice. One massive issue in Gaelic Games now is too much weightlifting and bodybuilding. So you have lads walking around 5-8kg above the weight their top speed is and it also limits the amount of repeat runs they can make. This issue is about to explode into an even greater one. Mindless when play a sport (Gaelic Football) that next year could ask in some players 15-30% more running than last season!! We are heading for an injury epidemic like no other if teams don’t prepare properly going forward. Some of the stuff I’m hearing from Senior Club and Inter County teams around the country already is mind bending stupidity. One leading “manager” (in inverted commas ‘cos hardly deserves the title) has completely ignored the protests of the S&C Coach in the demands of training and running said manager wants to do. Supposedly the highest level of the game. Paid professional ignored. Don’t think this isn’t common. We have to get to the needed KM’s, sprints, High speed runs and all that. But if we do it overweight and too fast we are absolutely going to break down. It’s physics folks, and some of these geniuses don’t believe in it. Credit: Hansen Athletics

Kevin Mulcahy

22,728 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Bill Maher just asked Senator Fetterman point-blank if there’s any truth to the rumor that he’s switching parties to become a Republican. When Fetterman delivered his response, he got an unexpected ovation from Maher’s audience. MAHER: “So there is no truth, right, that your actually going to switch parties? Because I know Trump has offered you...I mean, you’ve said ‘I would be a shitty Republican.’” FETTERMAN: “Yeah...and if I ever decide to change, and I won’t, have me on and I will announce that. But it is not going to...I am a committed Democrat, even though if I vote 93% of the time.” MAHER: “With the Democrats?” FETTERMAN: “Yeah, I thought we were supposed to be a big tent party? I’m not really sure how I have become an issue for any of the Democrats for just having some differing views in these other issues.” [Applause] Even Fetterman is now getting applause for refusing to let the radical left define what a Democrat is.

Bill Maher just asked Senator Fetterman point-blank if there’s any truth to the rumor that he’s switching parties to become a Republican. When Fetterman delivered his response, he got an unexpected ovation from Maher’s audience. MAHER: “So there is no truth, right, that your actually going to switch parties? Because I know Trump has offered you...I mean, you’ve said ‘I would be a shitty Republican.’” FETTERMAN: “Yeah...and if I ever decide to change, and I won’t, have me on and I will announce that. But it is not going to...I am a committed Democrat, even though if I vote 93% of the time.” MAHER: “With the Democrats?” FETTERMAN: “Yeah, I thought we were supposed to be a big tent party? I’m not really sure how I have become an issue for any of the Democrats for just having some differing views in these other issues.” [Applause] Even Fetterman is now getting applause for refusing to let the radical left define what a Democrat is.

Overton

1,236,486 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~~~Extended Transcript from Segment~~~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."

[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~Extended Transcript from Segment~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."

Joe Murgia

14,282 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Use these tips to PERFECT your 45° Extensions and BULLETPROOF your Lower Back/Hamstrings/Glutes: 1) Set pad height so the top is at the base of your pelvis — this will give the hips freedom to move/ensure range of motion isn’t restricted 2) Neutral neck/spine — keep gaze fixed straight ahead 3) Bend at the waist 4) ROM ends at bottom just prior to back rounding (NO dynamic movement of the spine i.e. flexion) 5) Keep legs as straight as possible if you’re trying to bias Hams….bent knees encouraged if trying to bias Glutes 6) Bias will also depend angle of the base (steeper is more Hams…less steep is more Glutes) 7) Turn toes out so they’re at maybe 60° if trying to bias the Glutes…keep closer to 90° if trying to bias Hams 8) The pulley/plate loaded machine setup provides the best potential for loading but if you don’t have access to that, hold a plate AT YOUR HEAD to load this exercise or with your arms extended (as long as it doesn’t bottom out ROM too early)…if the weight you can hold isn’t enough, rock with single leg 9) As always, control the eccentric and act explosively (while still maintaining control) on the concentric 10) Refrain from HYPEREXTENDING at the top…just reach hip extension and start your descent 11) 5ish to 10ish rep range @ 0-2 RIR is ideal…1-3ish sets 1-2ish x per week

Use these tips to PERFECT your 45° Extensions and BULLETPROOF your Lower Back/Hamstrings/Glutes: 1) Set pad height so the top is at the base of your pelvis — this will give the hips freedom to move/ensure range of motion isn’t restricted 2) Neutral neck/spine — keep gaze fixed straight ahead 3) Bend at the waist 4) ROM ends at bottom just prior to back rounding (NO dynamic movement of the spine i.e. flexion) 5) Keep legs as straight as possible if you’re trying to bias Hams….bent knees encouraged if trying to bias Glutes 6) Bias will also depend angle of the base (steeper is more Hams…less steep is more Glutes) 7) Turn toes out so they’re at maybe 60° if trying to bias the Glutes…keep closer to 90° if trying to bias Hams 8) The pulley/plate loaded machine setup provides the best potential for loading but if you don’t have access to that, hold a plate AT YOUR HEAD to load this exercise or with your arms extended (as long as it doesn’t bottom out ROM too early)…if the weight you can hold isn’t enough, rock with single leg 9) As always, control the eccentric and act explosively (while still maintaining control) on the concentric 10) Refrain from HYPEREXTENDING at the top…just reach hip extension and start your descent 11) 5ish to 10ish rep range @ 0-2 RIR is ideal…1-3ish sets 1-2ish x per week

Dean Turner

42,987 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen