Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Partisan Charities Failed To Win In 2024 You can’t help noticing how different the 2020 and 2024 elections look. After the 2020 election, Democrats insisted that over $400 million in Zuck Bucks had no significant effect on voter turnout. Biden, they suggested, earned a record-breaking 81 million votes through...

70,221 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Forester
Forestervor 1 Jahr

They didn't have the benefit of an overblown C19 pandemic, and Laura Trump recruited 100,000 poll watchers, to which 205,000 showed up along with 500 attorneys to stop the steal.

Profilbild von Barbara Hardy DIMELE
Barbara Hardy DIMELEvor 1 Jahr

2020 was a FRAUD Election... and make no mistake. Covid was made and released to do just that.. have an illegitimate 2020 Election!

Profilbild von De-Fund Congress
De-Fund Congressvor 1 Jahr

They won in 2020 buy fraud , no way in hell obden even got 50 million votes , stop with the bs , they stole an election

Profilbild von AwaisQarni
AwaisQarnivor 1 Jahr

🥰🥰🥰🥰❤❤❤

Profilbild von CENTEX MAGA 🇺🇸🙏
CENTEX MAGA 🇺🇸🙏vor 1 Jahr

@Sissy_Sunflower You suggest that Biden got 81M votes purely driven by get out the vote efforts. That is BS. Biden "won" in 2020 because of fraud. Any credible organization would state that.

Profilbild von debbie talbot
debbie talbotvor 1 Jahr

Yep

Profilbild von Proud Patriots
Proud Patriotsvor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸 President Trump Victory $2 Bill ✅ 45th & 47th President of The USA

Profilbild von debbie talbot
debbie talbotvor 1 Jahr

Yep and nobody actually ever believed that biden ever came close to that vote total, outrageous..

Profilbild von Beverly Benzakein
Beverly Benzakeinvor 1 Jahr

The right candidate won, Zuck aside.

Ähnliche Videos

The "Voter Registration Project" Charity Scam using nonprofits to STEAL MILLIONS of Votes for Democrats. This operation produced up to 2.7 MILLION votes for Joe Biden in the 2020 election alone, which were also connected to the most highly contested states with fraud. Go figure. Far-left nonprofits are electioneering voter registrations for Democrats using YOUR taxpayer dollars, disguising operations as "charities." Democrat voter registration effort "everybody votes" netted 5.1 MILLION voter registrations by spending $120 MILLION in 5 years. This group was exposed in the Podesta emails that was suppose to hand Hillary Clinton a guaranteed win in the 2016 election using YOUR tax-exempt taxpayer dollars to strengthen ONE political party and NOT voters in elections as a whole. These operations are alive and well and take many forms. Voter Registration Project, VRP, also tied to the "Everybody Votes Campaign," is a massive partisan scam disguised as a neutral 501(c)(3) charity, violating IRS rules by engaging in partisan electioneering to boost Democratic votes instead of staying truly nonpartisan. Over 100+ MILLION in dark money was funneled through charities, part of a $105 million 5-year plan, through VRP and similar "charities" to fund massive voter registration drives targeting swing states and Democrat-leaning demographics, African-American, Hispanic, low-income voters. Secret 2016 master plan to rig 2020 was created by Democratic consultants, Corridor Partners, aimed to register 2.4 million additional voters by 2020 specifically to influence election outcomes. Original versions, with track changes visible in leaked docs, openly discussed affecting the "outcome of an election." Payments to Democratic political operatives, with VRP paying over $2.5 million to GBI Strategies, a Democratic canvassing firm tied to groups like the DSCC and Biden campaign, for "voter registration consulting." Fraudulent voter registrations connects to multiple cases of suspicious/fraudulent registrations, including mismatched signatures, birthdates, and addresses submitted in states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, with York and Monroe counties having thousands of illegitimate forms, and Arizona. This operation generated up to 2.7 million votes for Biden in 2020 by focusing only on favorable demographics and swing states, avoiding deep-red or deep-blue areas. Foreign dark money influence traces back to foreign sources, including George Soros and Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss, via the Wyss Foundation, routed through U.S. charities to hide the origin and avoid scrutiny. Broader network of corruption is extensive, linked to other groups, like New Georgia Project fined $300k for partisan electioneering, Voter Participation Center using targeted ads excluding Republican-leaning audiences, and advised by Super PACs, like Mind the Gap, tied to Sam Bankman-Fried's family, to keep the operation secret from media and Republicans. "Stealing votes" via targeted mobilization is a sophisticated scheme to change election results by registering and turning out voters in ways that disproportionately favor one party, all under the cover of charitable "nonpartisan" work and taxpayer dollars that MUST be shut down. Follow the money and cut it off.

The SCIF

14,020 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Analysis of SURE data across 64 Pennsylvania counties identified approximately 205,122 more votes counted than voters on record from the PA 2020 election, leading to illegally certifying the 2020 presidential election. A December 28, 2020 analysis by Pennsylvania House Republicans identified a gross discrepancy of approximately 202,377, with a net unexplained discrepancy of approximately 170,830 votes after accounting for over- and under-votes. This totaled more than double Biden's certified margin of 80,555 votes. The mail in-ballots system for the general election of 2020 in Pennsylvania was so fraught with inconsistencies and irregularities that the reliability of the mail-in votes in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is impossible to rely upon. Dec 16, 2020: For instance, Over-vote in Philadelphia County. On November 4th at 11:30am, the DOS posted updated mail in vote counts for Philadelphia County. The number of ballots reported to have been counted was an impossible 508,112 ballots despite the fact that only 432,873 ballots had been issued to voters in that county. Later that day, the ballots counted number was reduced but this begs the question, who had the authority to add and subtract votes on the ballot counts reported to the Department of State? Even if this was simply a data entry error, the lack of internal controls over such reporting necessitates a review of the numbers, the process and system access. Additionally, in a data file received on November 4, 2020, the Commonwealth’s PA Open Data sites reported over 3.1 million mail in ballots sent out. The CSV file from the state on November 4 depicts 3.1 million mail in ballots sent out but on November 2, the information was provided that only 2.7 million ballots had been sent out. This discrepancy of approximately 400,000 ballots from November 2 to November 4 has not been explained. Furthermore, a newly available voter dataset available on the state .gov website, which had been offline for weeks indicated that it was last updated on 11/16/2020. The download of 11/16 shows 75,505 more ballots returned on 11/16 than the download from 11/15. Therefore, from 11/15 to 11/16, 75,505 ballots were added to the dataset with no explanation. Mail Date irregularities to include ballots mailed before the ballot was finalized, ballots mailed late and ballots mailed inconsistent with enacted legislation relative to mail in ballots: 154,584 ballots. There was also voter "Date of Birth" irregularities of 1573 ballots, of voters over 100 years old. Documents/Sources: Election Crime Bureau, Patrick Colbeck, Justice .gov, hsgac .senate .gov.

The SCIF

17,588 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat