正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Partition will be repeated – J. Sai Deepak’s stark warning J. Sai Deepak warns that India has moved beyond the age of feel-good speeches it’s time to confront harsh realities. Drawing parallels between the 1920s and today, he says the same patterns of separatism, appeasement, and communal tension are...

28,748 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

So this is Keshav Bedi in his Instagram story after he ran away from X due to lack of arguments to support his absurd claim that India has actually captured J&K against the will of people. He also stopped replies and quotes on his tweets. There he says: 0:16 - J&K state was Muslim majority and the king was Hindu. He merged the state against the will of people. 1:15 - When matter went to UN, India told people of J&K that we can’t give you independence but autonomy lelo. He also says autonomy and self rule was the condition in the accession document signed by Raja Hari Singh. 1:50 - India rigged elections in Jammu and Kashmir resulting in insurgency. He absolves Pakistan completely from it. 2:00 - Muslim majority was harassed by Hindu state (He calls Indian govt a Hindu state here) resulting in some atrocities on Kashmiri Hindus. He says dono me ek dusre per zulm kiya ie Kashmiri Hindus also did violence on Muslims. 3:00 - He says state promised autonomy but later didn’t give. BJP even withdrew autonomy. He also says autonomy was the substitute to independence demanded by Muslim majority J&K. 3:45 - He again says J&K was onboarded on condition of autonomy. 4:00 - He says Kashmiris will happily leave India if given an offer, and hence they should be appeased by giving extra rights and autonomy. 5:25 - He says that Yasin Malik should be released and no cases should be filed against him. He quotes the example of new Syrian president who was an ISIS fighter. He says Yasin Malik stopped those activities “jinko hum terrorist activities kahte hain.” Yasin Malik has serious charges of money laundering, terror funding and terrorism against him, Keshav Bedi wants him to become ruler instead. 6:34 - He quotes Jonah Blank saying JKLF was fighting for independence, India rigged elections and what not!

Rahul Kaushik

79,028 次观看 • 6 个月前

Nikitin Reached India Peacefully. Vasco Da Gama Arrived With Cannons. Guess Who Got the Credit??? Another LIE fed to the world and Bharatiye… Must read and share For decades, Indians were handed a neat colonial bedtime story: “Vasco da Gama discovered India.” A lie repeated until it became “history.” But almost 30 years before da Gama arrived with ships, guns, and priests, a lone merchant from Tver -Afanasiy Nikitin had already reached India by sea. Not as a conqueror. Not as an empire’s weapon. Just a traveler with courage and curiosity. Nikitin began his journey in 1466, sailing across the Caspian, Persia, Arabia, and the Indian Ocean completely alone. He lived in India for years, observing its society, trade, and culture with honesty that conquerors never had. His account, “The Journey Beyond Three Seas,” remains one of the earliest and most detailed European descriptions of India. No colonial lens. No missionary agenda. Just the truth he saw. So who fed Indians the myth that da Gama “discovered” India? Colonial-era textbooks. Imperial historians. A system built to glorify invaders and bury anyone who wasn’t a conqueror. Peaceful explorers didn’t fit the narrative. Empire-builders did. Nikitin didn’t claim land, didn’t plant flags, didn’t arrive with threats. He came with respect and he recorded India as he found it. That’s why he was forgotten. That’s why da Gama was elevated. It’s time to question the stories we inherited. It’s time to unmask the narratives crafted to justify domination. Afanasiy Nikitin reached India by sea long before Vasco da Gama and he did it without violence, conquest, or empire. A buried truth. Now resurfacing.

Comman Man

23,707 次观看 • 5 个月前

🔥 “After Nehru, Rahul Gandhi Is the First Who Took the RSS Head-On” Former Rajya Sabha MP Mohammad Adeeb makes a striking political argument: Rahul Gandhi, he says, is the first major leader in the Nehru-Gandhi family after Jawaharlal Nehru to confront the RSS directly and without hesitation. Adeeb contrasts Rahul’s approach with Indira Gandhi, whom he says was more politically flexible towards the RSS. His larger point is about ideological inheritance: Rahul Gandhi, in his view, has demonstrated that he represents the constitutional, secular and pluralist vision associated with Nehru—and that this explains why the RSS and its supporters continue to attack Nehru. Adeeb also makes a powerful historical argument about India’s plural inheritance. If Mughal history is removed from textbooks, he asks rhetorically, should we also remove the monuments and cultural legacy associated with that period—the Red Fort, Jama Masjid and the Taj Mahal? His underlying message is simple: You cannot selectively erase history without impoverishing the history of India itself. He then moves to accountability. Whether someone is a politician, activist or thinker, Adeeb argues, they should ask where the enormous amounts of public money being spent are going—and insist that those responsible eventually provide an account. He further claims that many communal conflicts historically had an economic dimension, arguing that Muslim-owned crafts and businesses were displaced in the aftermath of communal violence. That is a serious historical claim and should be examined through evidence rather than treated as an established fact merely because it is asserted in an interview. Adeeb has a long record of speaking on secularism, minority rights and the RSS. In earlier interviews, he has criticised the Congress for what he called its diluted secularism while also arguing that the party historically did not make Muslims feel that they did not belong to India. The larger question India's history cannot be reduced to the history of one religion, one dynasty or one ideology. A civilisation becomes stronger when it remembers everything—not when it remembers selectively. And democratic politics requires something even more important: Power must be questioned, public money must be accounted for, and historical claims must survive scrutiny rather than propaganda. 🎥 Video credit: News MX 📌 Source: "Threads post / original video" #RahulGandhi #Nehru #RSS #Secularism #IndianHistory #Democracy #Constitution #MohammadAdeeb #DimagiNaxal

Ashok Dadhwal

30,221 次观看 • 1 个月前

Ajit Doval is the reason India stopped sending dossiers and started sending special forces. For decades, Indian intelligence was defined by "Strategic Restraint" a polite way of saying we absorbed the pain. Doval didn’t just change the policy; he changed the psychology of the state. He is the greatest asset to Indian national security, not because he is a "spy," but because he gave the system a spine. The Origin: Seven Years in the Wolf’s Den Before he wore suits in Delhi, Doval lived the terrified, lonely life of an undercover operative in Pakistan for seven years. He didn't just speak the language; he mastered the religion and culture so perfectly that he could correct locals on scripture. He lived every day knowing that one slip-up meant a torture cell. The Golden Temple (1988) When the Black Thunder operation began, he didn't command from outside. He went inside as a rickshaw puller. He mapped the terrorists, gained their trust, and dismantled the siege from within. The Doctrine "Defensive Offense" When he became NSA, the rulebook changed.His philosophy is simple: You do not fight a war on your own soil. You take it to the source. -->From the cross-border strikes to the crackdown on internal radical networks like PFI, the message is clear India is no longer a "soft state." -->Whether it’s the safe return of the 8 Navy veterans from Qatar or the sudden inability of anti-India elements to find safe havens abroad, Doval’s "long arm" is now globally recognized. The Crisis Manager Doval is the man sent when the situation is "impossible." Kandahar He was on the tarmac negotiating with terrorists. Kashmir (Art 370) While the world predicted civil war, he was on the streets of Srinagar eating with locals, ensuring the integration happened without the predicted bloodbath. Russia-Ukraine (2025) He became the quiet messenger between Putin and Zelenskyy, proving India’s geopolitical weight. The Vision: "Avenge History" (Jan 2026) Just ten days ago, at age 80, Doval revealed his final mission. He told the youth "We have to avenge our history." He didn't mean violence. He meant competence. He meant becoming so economically and militarily powerful that the humiliations of the past can never happen again. He declared that India is now on "autopilot" a machine built to rise, regardless of politics. Leaders come and go. Governments change. But the security architecture Doval has built will protect India for the next 50 years. He didn't just protect the nation; he taught it how to fight back. He is the spine that holds the system upright. Col AJ🇮🇳 Colonel Mayank Chaubey Major Sammer Pal Toorr (Infantry Combat Veteran) Aadi Achint 🇮🇳 TheGlobalDecoder Aman singh #AjitDoval #NSA #India #IndianArmy

The Sacred Scroll

21,535 次观看 • 8 个月前

HCM Omar Abdullah is compromising the dignity of the J&K state - which once was strong enough that if the PM of the country had to visit J&K, Visa was necessary - by going out of his way to please & bow to the BJP-led centre. He himself is disempowering the "The chair of the CM of J&K" Has Mr. Omar Abdullah forgot the way NC managed a campaign in which they presented BJP as the biggest possible threat for J&K? Now, within 3 months, what has changed in J&K that NC started singing a different tune, praising the BJP & being totally subservient to the centre? Mobilizing people on radical grounds during elections to gain power, only to completely abandon those grounds, leads to widespread disillusionment with the democratic process itself. It often leads to the feeling of betrayal among masses which eventually makes people reactionary. Elections are not a farce. The will of the people is not a joke. Democracy should not leave people feeling resentful as if they’ve been conned by the electoral process. Our politicians need to understand that repeatedly betraying public sentiment not only erodes trust but also alienates people from democratic participation.l The National Conference (NC) has mastered the art of promoting the rhetoric of Kashmiri dignity & autonomy, using religious & cultural identity to emotionally charge the people & win elections, only to betray those very sentiments at critical moments. Time and again, they have positioned themselves as the defenders of Kashmir’s rights, only to compromise when it suits their power calculus. This pattern of emotional exploitation, followed by betrayal, not only makes the NC's collaboration with the Centre the cheapest & most insincere in Kashmir’s political history but also makes people feel that democratic process is not a solution. History has been repeating itself too often in Kashmir when it comes to ruling parties.

Vikas Amin

23,837 次观看 • 1 年前

Paul Verhoeven on whether the events that take place in "Total Recall" (1990) are real or just a dream: "It is both. To be honest, that’s what I want. I made the movie in a way that it would be true on both levels, and I spent a lot of time to get that. If you want a scientific explanation, you know, of course, in quantum mechanics there is a very interesting principle, the principle of uncertainty, Heisenberg’s principle. If you have a big object and if you try to measure the place of the object and the velocity of the object at the same time, the more precisely you measure velocity the less precise place gets. So that’s the principle. That means, of course, that there are different realities possible at the same moment. What I wanted to do in 'Total Recall' is to do a movie where both levels are true. I mean for me, of course, the film anyhow has to do with two realities, one being the reality of going as a secret agent to Mars and discovering that there is a problem, and solving the problem, which is starting the nuclear reactor and helping the guerrillas and destroying Cohaagen. The second level of the movie, of course, is that from the moment that he goes into the Rekall chair ‘til the end it’s a dream, and I tried to make that second level work throughout the whole movie. So there’s the dream level which starts when he gets into the chair and the thing is in his neck, and that would go throughout the whole movie, so in the next scene where they say, Oh, there’s a problem, there’s a big glitch here, that would be already the dream, of course. That’s where the dream starts. And the next scene where they are fighting and stuff would be part of his dream, convincing him that it is real, because there is a glitch but that would be part of the program. It would be built into the program to make him accept the fact that it’s real, but it’s a dream. If you look at the movie, if you haven’t seen it, or for the second time, you’ll see that the whole program that’s set up at the beginning when he goes to the Rekall office and he talks to this guy who sells him the program on Mars, you’ll see that he gets everything that he wants: he gets the trip to Mars, he gets the girl, the exotic girl, he ki!!s the bad guys, and he saves the entire planet. That’s what he does. And that’s basically the dream. Even halfway through the movie, you may remember, this other guy comes in, Dr. Edgemar, and tells him that he’s in a dream, that he’s still in the Rekall chair, and then Arnold says, “If I’m there, I can ki!! you.” And he puts a gun to his head and the guy says, “Sure, no problem for me, big problem for you, because you will be psychotic from now on because the walls of reality will fall apart. One moment you will be the savior of the rebel cause, the next moment you’ll be Cohaagen’s bosom buddy, but in the end—you will even have these strange fantasies about alien civilizations—but at the end you will be lobotomized.” And then if you see the movie, you realize that all these things happen. I mean he is lobotomized at the end. That’s why at the last shot, when they are so happy and kissing each other, it slowly fades to white, which for me meant, “OK, there he goes. That’s the end-that’s the dream—they lobotomized him.” And all the other things happened, he finds the alien civilization, he rescues the planet, he finds the good girl, he k!!ls the bad guys, but it’s a dream. Now, of course you can see it as a reality, too. So at the end of the movie, getting to white means either it’s a happy ending or he loses his brains . . . which is probably also a happy ending, I don’t know. That was basically what l wanted—that at the end there would be two possibilities, and they would be both true—for me they are both true—it’s not either one or the other. It’s not that either it’s a dream or it is a reality. It is a dream and it is a reality. And I think they’re both there." (Paul Verhoeven's interview with Chris Shea & Wade Jennings, 1992) P.S: On this day, 36 years ago, "Total Recall" (1990) premiered in Los Angeles, California, USA.

DepressedBergman

66,465 次观看 • 3 个月前

Bilbo Baggins: When a Life Is Stretched to Its Limit There is a line spoken by Bilbo Baggins in The Lord of the Rings that has stayed with me: “I’m old, Gandalf. I know I don’t look it, but I’m beginning to feel it in my heart. I feel thin, sort of stretched, like butter that has been scraped over too much bread.” At first, this might sound like nothing more than the complaint of someone who has lived too long. But what caught my attention was not that Bilbo says he is old. It is the way he describes that feeling: “I feel thin.” He does not say that he is in pain. He says that he is being stretched. And from there, I began to see this line as an image of a being carrying a burden greater than the scope of an ordinary life. This is my personal interpretation. Tolkien does not directly present a concept of “capacity” or “the elasticity of a life” in the way I am using those ideas here. I am simply taking Bilbo’s own image of “butter and bread” and using it to look more deeply into the feeling he is describing. Too Much Bread and Too Little Butter If I had to imagine that feeling through another image, I would think of a balloon. When it is in its natural state, it has a certain shape. As the pressure increases, it begins to stretch. It has not burst. But it is no longer in its original state. And I think Bilbo is much the same. He has possessed the Ring for sixty years. Yet what is remarkable is that, after all that time, Bilbo is still Bilbo. He still loves the Shire, loves Bag End, cares about Frodo, writes books, smokes, and talks with Gandalf. The Ring has affected him, but it has not completely taken over who he is. That is why I do not think Bilbo’s endurance should simply be understood as: “He was so strong that the Ring could not affect him.” Quite the opposite. The words “I feel thin, sort of stretched...” show that he has already begun to feel that pressure from within. And this is where the image of “butter and bread” becomes especially interesting. The piece of bread does not necessarily have to be understood as the Ring itself. In the way I see it, it is something broader. It is the entire scope of what Bilbo is carrying: the passing years, his unusual existence, the pressure of the Ring, and everything that comes with it. The butter, meanwhile, is Bilbo himself. A finite being with finite capacity. A little butter is enough for a reasonably sized piece of bread. But when it has to be spread across a piece of bread that is too large, it has to become thinner. And that is what I feel in Bilbo. It is not that he suddenly becomes weak. It is that the same being is having to stretch itself to accommodate a burden that has grown beyond the boundaries of an ordinary life. “Stretched” Does Not Mean Destroyed This is the part I find most important. Bilbo is still alive. He is still himself. He still has things he loves and still has the ability to experience the world around him. But something has appeared within him that perhaps was not there before: He feels that he is being stretched too thin. So, being “stretched” does not mean that Bilbo has been destroyed. It shows that he is still enduring, but that his endurance has begun to leave a mark. Being able to endure does not mean being unaffected. A person can endure something for a very long time and still become tired. Someone can continue living almost normally while inwardly feeling that they are being stretched too thin. Bilbo is in precisely that state. And perhaps that is why his next words feel so natural: “I need a holiday, a very long holiday...” I like the way Bilbo says this. He does not try to prove that he can endure more. He simply realizes that he needs to leave. To me, this is a remarkable form of awareness. Bilbo does not wait until he has completely lost himself before recognizing the problem. He realizes that he is being stretched. And from that realization, he wants to step away from the circumstances creating that pressure. Recognizing Your Limit Is Also a Form of Strength If we continue with the image of the balloon, Bilbo has enough elasticity to withstand that pressure for decades. But that elasticity is not infinite. The more it is stretched, the farther it moves from its original state. And what catches my attention most is that Bilbo is still aware enough to recognize this. From this perspective, I see Bilbo’s decision to leave in a different way. He does not leave because he has failed. He leaves because he has recognized his limit. To me, this is much more meaningful than simply saying that Bilbo is “strong” because he was able to possess the Ring for so long. A being can be remarkably resilient and still have limits. And being able to recognize those limits is not weakness. It is awareness. Bilbo does not say: “I can endure more.” He says, in a very different way: “I need a holiday.” Perhaps that simplicity is exactly what makes the line so thought-provoking. He does not need to prove how strong he is. He only needs to be honest about what he is feeling. Why Is the Image of the “Butter” So Sad? That is also why I find Bilbo’s image of the butter so sad. Bilbo is still there. He has not disappeared. He has not been destroyed. But he feels as though he has been spread too thin. The image does not describe a moment of collapse. It describes a process. The burden creates pressure. The pressure forces Bilbo to adapt. That prolonged adaptation makes him feel increasingly stretched. And eventually, he realizes that he cannot continue that way forever. That is what makes the words “I feel thin” so important. “Thin” is not a declaration of weakness. It is a sign that a being has been pulled away from its natural state for too long. And recognizing that opens a choice for Bilbo: To leave. It makes me see Bilbo differently: “Bilbo is not a being that cannot be stretched; he is a being that has endured pressure for a very long time, yet remained aware enough to recognize that his capacity to stretch is not infinite.” And perhaps that is what I like most about this line. Strength is not always about enduring more. Sometimes, strength is knowing that you have endured enough.

🎼🌺Music Love♥️

15,306 次观看 • 1 个月前

#WATCH | Hyderabad, Telangana: AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi says, "As far as our party is concerned, we condemn what happened to Deepu Chandra Das and Amrit Mandal, and we support whatever steps the Government of India is taking to ensure that the relationship with Bangladesh remains stronger." "Bangladesh was created on secular Bangla nationalism, and there are 20 million minorities who are not Muslims who live in Bangladesh...I sincerely hope that the tensions don't escalate between India and Bangladesh, and whatever is happening in Bangladesh in terms of what happened to the sad incident of Dipu Chandra Das and Amrit Mandal is contrary to their own constitutional mandate, and I hope that Mr Yunus will ensure that all the minorities living in Bangladesh are protected. But at the same time, we must remember that the stability in Bangladesh is very important for security of India, especially Northeast. A popular revolution has happened in Bangladesh, and we hope that when the elections are held in February, the relationship between India and Bangladesh will improve for good. And we must also remember that ISI, China and all these forces which are inimical to India are now in Bangladesh...But at the same time, please understand that we cannot forget what is happening in our country. On December 24, a labourer from West Bengal was lynched in Odisha's Sambalpur. A tribal boy doing MBA in Uttarakhand was beaten up, Angel Chakma. He died...So these are all clear examples of how when the rule of law breaks and majority-run politics overtakes everything, these lynchings happen, which we have to condemn."

ANI

22,871 次观看 • 9 个月前