Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Patch 12.09 // Neon Changes // #VALORANT • Jumping with High Gear active no longer provides any speed bonus while Neon is airborne. Instead, Neon’s air speed while sprinting will match melee speed. • Fuel will only regenerate with a kill when Neon's ultimate is active • Fuel will...

816,119 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Congress seems to be the unhappiest when India makes progress. Its latest target is the Mumbai–Ahmedabad High-Speed Rail project. This is not just another infrastructure project. It is a transformative investment in India’s future. The India-Japan partnership remains firmly committed to operationalising the corridor at the earliest. While Japan’s advanced E10 Shinkansen trains are expected in the early 2030s, both countries have pragmatically agreed that services will begin with Indian-developed high-speed trainsets instead of waiting. The message is clear: deliver results first, while simultaneously building India’s indigenous high-speed rail capabilities. The benefits are immense: • It will connect India’s financial capital, Mumbai, with one of its fastest-growing commercial hubs, Ahmedabad, in a fraction of the current travel time. • Cities like Surat, the world’s diamond processing capital, and Vapi, a major industrial and chemical manufacturing hub, will be seamlessly integrated into a high-speed economic corridor. • Travel time will be cut by over four hours, making business travel, investment, tourism and regional connectivity far more efficient. • The project will strengthen manufacturing, create skilled jobs, enhance logistics and accelerate economic integration across one of India’s most productive regions. This is what nation-building looks like: combining global partnerships with Indian innovation, ensuring world-class infrastructure while strengthening domestic technological capability. Which raises a simple question: when a project promises faster connectivity, stronger economic growth, more jobs, and greater self-reliance, why is Congress so determined to ridicule it? Time and again, Congress has chosen to oppose transformational infrastructure instead of supporting India’s growth story. The country deserves better than politics that seeks to undermine progress.

Amit Malviya

22,536 views • 15 days ago

Explaining the Ash Nerf confusion: Patchnotes say: "Dash gives less of a boost when not dashing in the direction you're moving" What does that mean ? I dug into it. TLDR: Redirects above 90° are only really possible at normal Slidejump velocities. Angle and speed of your dash will deviate further and further from where you wanna go based on speed and angle change. 90°: Dash seems to work fairly well all the way up to 90° up to a certain velocity. - At Slidejump velocities it works in all directions. - At Superjump velocities you can still dash full 90°. - Above 90° your final direction deviates more and more from your desired direction as the angle increases. - Backwards dash seems to straight up subtract with whatever current velocity you have. Velocity: - As velocity increases even 90° changes are no longer possible. - And as your speed goes above the speed of the dash, dashing backwards will drop you straight down or you'll even continue traveling forward. Nerd yap: I feels like it's not just a straight vector addition but it does in fact have some velocity/angle thresholds in place. My assumption is that >90° changes stop applying the full dash boost at around the velocity of the dash itself so 600-700hu/s. And that above 90° it is a straight up dot product no matter the velocity. You just don't really notice cus of the low initial speed. But players will adjust to it based on feeling and experience anyways so i currently don't care enough to dig deeper🤷‍♂️

Mokey

67,397 views • 10 months ago

Mbappe does not have the IQ to play football “very” effectively without his speed. Calm, and don’t drag me yet. Do you know why Messi is still effective at his age despite being slower? It’s because he has learned how to play football without having to run too much. At some point, Mbappe’s speed will reduce, but he doesn’t have that much IQ to survive so much without it. On dead ball situations where he doesn’t have to run, just watch, he’s less effective. He can’t drop a mad line-breaking pass, he can’t wiggle around players. I mean, anything that doesn’t involve his speed, he’s less effective. Of course he’s done a lot without his speed, but he’s less potent, I hope you don’t misunderstand this part. Mbappe is deadliest on transition. Same with Barcola and Dembele. If a team is in shape, these guys are not effective, e.g Paraguay…you can also see the France team, they don’t intend to keep the ball, their only plan is to wait for you to lose it and they play it to those 4 guys, you are finished. Please listen to Thierry Henry. He said he was so quick and relied on his speed, a coach had to tell him at some point to play without his speed. This made him think more and play more with his brain. As Mbappe grows, his speed will slow down, he still has more than 10 years to play, and I hope he can learn that part where he can be effective without speed. Cristiano scored more after 30 years old when his speed had reduced. I hope you guys get my point, I know many will still misunderstand it.

TobyWrites

1,234,307 views • 17 days ago

Why Does Indonesia Have a 350 km/h Fast Train While Australia Still Struggles With Average-Speed Rail? By Jamie McIntyre, Political Commentator, Australian National Review One of the biggest surprises of my recent visit to Indonesia wasn’t the new capital city of Nusantara or Jakarta’s relentless pace. It was boarding the Whoosh high-speed train between Jakarta and Bandung. The experience was extraordinary. In just around 30 minutes, we travelled between two major cities at speeds reaching approximately 350 km/h. The journey was smooth, quiet and every bit as impressive as the high-speed rail systems I’ve experienced elsewhere in Asia. What struck me wasn’t simply Indonesia’s achievement. It was Australia’s failure. Indonesia is still commonly described as a developing nation, yet it has managed to build one of Southeast Asia’s most advanced transport systems while Australia, one of the wealthiest countries in the world on a per capita basis, still cannot deliver even ordinary passenger rail between many of its major population centres. Perhaps before politicians start talking about futuristic high-speed rail, Australia should first learn how to build an average-speed train. Take the Brisbane to Gold Coast corridor. The two cities are only around 70 kilometres apart. An ordinary modern passenger train travelling at about 120 km/h could complete much of that journey in around 30 to 40 minutes, transforming daily commuting for hundreds of thousands of people. Instead, commuters often spend 70 to 90 minutes on today’s rail services, and considerably longer if travelling by car during peak-hour gridlock. That isn’t simply inconvenient. It is an enormous drag on productivity, quality of life and economic growth. Every extra hour spent sitting in traffic is an hour not spent with family, running a business or contributing to the economy. Meanwhile, Indonesia has leapfrogged into the future. The country’s Whoosh high-speed railway demonstrates what can be achieved when governments decide that modern infrastructure is an investment rather than merely another political announcement. Australia has spent decades discussing high-speed rail. We’ve commissioned study after study, produced glossy reports and made election promises. Yet little changes. Australians deserve to ask an uncomfortable question. How can Indonesia build a 350 km/h railway while Australia still struggles to provide reliable, average-speed rail between nearby cities? Infrastructure should not be viewed through a political lens. It should be viewed through an economic one. -Faster transport means higher productivity. -It expands labour markets. -It reduces congestion. -It increases property values around transport hubs. -It attracts investment. -It improves tourism. Most importantly, it gives people back something increasingly valuable: time. Australia has the engineering expertise. It has the financial capacity. What appears to be missing is the political will. Watching Indonesia’s sleek high-speed train glide effortlessly across Java was inspiring. It also served as a reminder that Australia’s infrastructure ambitions have become far too modest. Perhaps it’s time to stop debating whether Australia can build world-class rail and instead start asking why nations with fewer resources are already doing it. Until then, Australians will continue watching other countries race ahead while we remain stuck in traffic.

jamiemcintyre

10,805 views • 1 month ago