正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

pattern interrupt is the only thing that buys three seconds on meta. a girl with a mouth full of pills doesn't sell anything. it just breaks the brain's "this is an ad" match for half a second. that half-second is the entire game. meta's engagement signal triggers once someone... show more

goop

1,754 subscribers

25,456 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Spurs coach Mitch Johnson: “You have to continue to be tough-minded enough to play the brand of basketball regardless of the outcome or what the score is. We did a really good job of that in the first half and not a good job of that at all in the second half.”

Spurs Nation

28,801 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is painful to watch, but if you can, watch the entire four minutes. This is from earlier this year. Joy Reid claims that the Russians have been grooming Trump to be a Russian agent since 1977. This is 2024. Five years after the three year Russian collusion hoax was exposed. Look at the vitriol and hatred as this half-brained lunatic spins her tale. How did we get to the point in this country that someone like this is on TV?

This is painful to watch, but if you can, watch the entire four minutes. This is from earlier this year. Joy Reid claims that the Russians have been grooming Trump to be a Russian agent since 1977. This is 2024. Five years after the three year Russian collusion hoax was exposed. Look at the vitriol and hatred as this half-brained lunatic spins her tale. How did we get to the point in this country that someone like this is on TV?

MAZE

614,575 次观看 • 1 年前

🇺🇸One breach is a lapse. Three is a pattern. Fmr. CIA Intel Larry Johnson says that dismissing this as incompetence no longer makes sense after the first one. "The purpose of any system is what it does. We need to be asking what the purpose of this system is?" Someone knows more than they're saying. SonofNewAmericanRevolution

🇺🇸One breach is a lapse. Three is a pattern. Fmr. CIA Intel Larry Johnson says that dismissing this as incompetence no longer makes sense after the first one. "The purpose of any system is what it does. We need to be asking what the purpose of this system is?" Someone knows more than they're saying. SonofNewAmericanRevolution

Mario Nawfal

41,406 次观看 • 2 个月前

Come to think of it, if characters in FNF based on real people look more realistic than the rest of the characters, is that just a visual cue to help the player identify them, or does it imply that the average FNF character looks literally like the BF from this video in-universe?

Come to think of it, if characters in FNF based on real people look more realistic than the rest of the characters, is that just a visual cue to help the player identify them, or does it imply that the average FNF character looks literally like the BF from this video in-universe?

FNF: Vs Cartoon Cat

16,264 次观看 • 17 天前

$Elon Musk just told you exactly how the AI race ends. Not with a better chip. Not with a smarter model. With the Sun. Musk: “So to do that, we need to harness the power of the Sun.” That is not a metaphor. It is a thermodynamic blueprint for the next thousand years. The market thinks this race ends at a data center. It does not. Every watt generated on this planet is a rounding error compared to what the Sun outputs in a single second. You cannot run superintelligence on a grid that struggles to keep the lights on. The bottleneck of this decade is not silicon. It is not software. It is raw energy. And Earth does not have enough. Musk: “We want to be a civilization that expands to the galaxy with spaceships that anyone can go anywhere they want at any time.” That is not aspiration. That is an engineering specification. A single-planet species is a dead species on a long enough timeline. Every civilization that stopped expanding did not plateau. It collapsed. The organizations fighting for control of Earth’s power grid are fighting over a grid that is already obsolete. The real play is orbital. Space-based solar. Zero atmospheric loss. Direct capture from the source. When you decouple your compute engine from terrestrial physics, the ceiling disappears. The regulatory class wants to slow the grid down. The builders want to abandon the grid entirely. That is the fracture point of this century. The United States either captures the orbital board or watches someone else do it. There is no middle position. Musk is not building rockets. He is engineering the escape velocity for an entire species. While Washington debates permits, he is calculating how to swallow the output of a star. The Sun puts out more energy in one second than humanity has consumed in its entire history. Whoever captures even a fraction of that first does not win the AI race. They win everything.$

Elon Musk just told you exactly how the AI race ends. Not with a better chip. Not with a smarter model. With the Sun. Musk: “So to do that, we need to harness the power of the Sun.” That is not a metaphor. It is a thermodynamic blueprint for the next thousand years. The market thinks this race ends at a data center. It does not. Every watt generated on this planet is a rounding error compared to what the Sun outputs in a single second. You cannot run superintelligence on a grid that struggles to keep the lights on. The bottleneck of this decade is not silicon. It is not software. It is raw energy. And Earth does not have enough. Musk: “We want to be a civilization that expands to the galaxy with spaceships that anyone can go anywhere they want at any time.” That is not aspiration. That is an engineering specification. A single-planet species is a dead species on a long enough timeline. Every civilization that stopped expanding did not plateau. It collapsed. The organizations fighting for control of Earth’s power grid are fighting over a grid that is already obsolete. The real play is orbital. Space-based solar. Zero atmospheric loss. Direct capture from the source. When you decouple your compute engine from terrestrial physics, the ceiling disappears. The regulatory class wants to slow the grid down. The builders want to abandon the grid entirely. That is the fracture point of this century. The United States either captures the orbital board or watches someone else do it. There is no middle position. Musk is not building rockets. He is engineering the escape velocity for an entire species. While Washington debates permits, he is calculating how to swallow the output of a star. The Sun puts out more energy in one second than humanity has consumed in its entire history. Whoever captures even a fraction of that first does not win the AI race. They win everything.

Dustin

18,203 次观看 • 3 个月前

"One of the reasons this is not an easy sell to a top candidate is it's not just the QB room that is in the bottom three." #DawgPound Zac Jackson wonders if the hiring of a younger coordinator on a longer leash signals a full rebuild plan.

"One of the reasons this is not an easy sell to a top candidate is it's not just the QB room that is in the bottom three." #DawgPound Zac Jackson wonders if the hiring of a younger coordinator on a longer leash signals a full rebuild plan.

BIGPLAY Cleveland Show

16,069 次观看 • 6 个月前

Phillip: Is it okay for anybody in this country to say whether they're a senator or not, that, hey, if you're in the military, you shouldn't follow illegal orders? Cuccinelli: That is an okay thing to say— Phillip: Why is it that it's okay for me to say, but the FBI is knocking on the door of five members of congress. Why?

Phillip: Is it okay for anybody in this country to say whether they're a senator or not, that, hey, if you're in the military, you shouldn't follow illegal orders? Cuccinelli: That is an okay thing to say— Phillip: Why is it that it's okay for me to say, but the FBI is knocking on the door of five members of congress. Why?

Acyn

233,643 次观看 • 7 个月前

Is this OpenClaw + Seedance 2.0 combo the future of long-form AI video generation? In this Gandalf example, the #OpenClaw agent autonomously runs three Seedance 2.0 generations, waits for them to finish, reviews the clips, then edits them together with a match-cut transition.

Is this OpenClaw + Seedance 2.0 combo the future of long-form AI video generation? In this Gandalf example, the #OpenClaw agent autonomously runs three Seedance 2.0 generations, waits for them to finish, reviews the clips, then edits them together with a match-cut transition.

ChatCut

19,013 次观看 • 5 个月前

Tony Robbins on how to change someone who doesn't want to change: 1. People only change when they link enough pain to staying the same or enough pleasure to changing. Ideally, both at once. This is not a mindset shift. It happens in the nervous system, not the head. Your head can know exactly what you should do, and your gut will override it every single time. 2. Yes, you can change someone who doesn't want to change. But not by forcing them. You find the leverage that makes them change themselves. Everyone has a point that will get them to follow through. For some people, it is not even the threat of their own life. For others, it is their children. For others, it is spiritual growth. The leverage is different for everyone, but it always exists. 3. The food poisoning example. You used to love a food or a drink. Then one night it came back up with enough intensity and enough aroma that to this day you cannot look at it without feeling repelled. No willpower required. Your brain simply rewired what it links pleasure to. That is the entire mechanism of change in one story. 4. Scrooge did not want to change. He was certain he did not need to change. Three ghosts showed up and did one thing: they made him link unbearable pain to his past, his present, and his future simultaneously. When there is nowhere to escape, change happens in a heartbeat. Robbins calls this the Dickens pattern. Lock pain into all three time zones at once, and there is no exit. 5. People avoid changing by escaping to a different time period. If the present is painful, escape to a good memory from the past. If the past was also painful, invent a better future and escape there. As long as one of those three zones offers relief, the pressure to change dissolves. Removing all three exits and change becomes inevitable. 6. Problem is some people have accidentally linked pain to things they actually need: exercise, intimacy, and hard conversations. The association is wrong, but it runs their life anyway. The job is not to build more willpower. It is to change what you have linked pain and pleasure to in the first place.

Tony Robbins on how to change someone who doesn't want to change: 1. People only change when they link enough pain to staying the same or enough pleasure to changing. Ideally, both at once. This is not a mindset shift. It happens in the nervous system, not the head. Your head can know exactly what you should do, and your gut will override it every single time. 2. Yes, you can change someone who doesn't want to change. But not by forcing them. You find the leverage that makes them change themselves. Everyone has a point that will get them to follow through. For some people, it is not even the threat of their own life. For others, it is their children. For others, it is spiritual growth. The leverage is different for everyone, but it always exists. 3. The food poisoning example. You used to love a food or a drink. Then one night it came back up with enough intensity and enough aroma that to this day you cannot look at it without feeling repelled. No willpower required. Your brain simply rewired what it links pleasure to. That is the entire mechanism of change in one story. 4. Scrooge did not want to change. He was certain he did not need to change. Three ghosts showed up and did one thing: they made him link unbearable pain to his past, his present, and his future simultaneously. When there is nowhere to escape, change happens in a heartbeat. Robbins calls this the Dickens pattern. Lock pain into all three time zones at once, and there is no exit. 5. People avoid changing by escaping to a different time period. If the present is painful, escape to a good memory from the past. If the past was also painful, invent a better future and escape there. As long as one of those three zones offers relief, the pressure to change dissolves. Removing all three exits and change becomes inevitable. 6. Problem is some people have accidentally linked pain to things they actually need: exercise, intimacy, and hard conversations. The association is wrong, but it runs their life anyway. The job is not to build more willpower. It is to change what you have linked pain and pleasure to in the first place.

Jaynit

279,313 次观看 • 27 天前

First mention of the fumble is 3+ seconds after it happens. First acknowledgement SF got it 7 seconds after ref says it’s there’s. This is a once-in-a-decade type play to save a game at the goal line in the final seconds. This ain’t it.

First mention of the fumble is 3+ seconds after it happens. First acknowledgement SF got it 7 seconds after ref says it’s there’s. This is a once-in-a-decade type play to save a game at the goal line in the final seconds. This ain’t it.

Grant Paulsen

1,312,560 次观看 • 9 个月前

I just cracked the code on AI UGC ads 🤯 This ad is nearly THREE minutes long, and it has perfect character, voice, and product consistency across the entire video. I found a winning authority-style ad running on Meta, recreated it shot-for-shot with AI, and ended up with what you see below. Two consistent characters, consistent voice, real product in hand. If you've been stuck generating 8 second clips that look fine but can't hold attention for a full funnel ad, this is the workflow you're missing. Here's exactly how I did it: → Find a winning ad in Meta Ad Library and download it → Upload to Loom to get a timestamped transcript (this becomes your script) → Screenshot each character → clean in ChatGPT Images 2.0 → upload as Seedance Elements → Generate your first clip per character to lock in their voice → Extract that voice as an MP3 via CapCut, attach it to every clip after → Edit in CapCut: remove dead zones, speed up to 1.1x, done → Drop final video in the Captions app, add subtitles, export 2 minutes and 40 seconds, perfect character & product consistency. I put together the full step-by-step playbook with exact Seedance prompts, the CapCut speed trick, and a voiceover technique most people don't know about. Want access completely for free? > Comment "UGC" > Like this post And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

I just cracked the code on AI UGC ads 🤯 This ad is nearly THREE minutes long, and it has perfect character, voice, and product consistency across the entire video. I found a winning authority-style ad running on Meta, recreated it shot-for-shot with AI, and ended up with what you see below. Two consistent characters, consistent voice, real product in hand. If you've been stuck generating 8 second clips that look fine but can't hold attention for a full funnel ad, this is the workflow you're missing. Here's exactly how I did it: → Find a winning ad in Meta Ad Library and download it → Upload to Loom to get a timestamped transcript (this becomes your script) → Screenshot each character → clean in ChatGPT Images 2.0 → upload as Seedance Elements → Generate your first clip per character to lock in their voice → Extract that voice as an MP3 via CapCut, attach it to every clip after → Edit in CapCut: remove dead zones, speed up to 1.1x, done → Drop final video in the Captions app, add subtitles, export 2 minutes and 40 seconds, perfect character & product consistency. I put together the full step-by-step playbook with exact Seedance prompts, the CapCut speed trick, and a voiceover technique most people don't know about. Want access completely for free? > Comment "UGC" > Like this post And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

40,148 次观看 • 1 个月前

The reason the idea that “both sides” commit political violence is so offensive is not only that it’s false; it’s that it reassigns to the Right to half the guilt of a crime committed against them, while not one Democrat has apologized for the rhetoric they shared with the killer

The reason the idea that “both sides” commit political violence is so offensive is not only that it’s false; it’s that it reassigns to the Right to half the guilt of a crime committed against them, while not one Democrat has apologized for the rhetoric they shared with the killer

Batya Ungar-Sargon

680,058 次观看 • 10 个月前

Literally just watch the next 20 seconds in the video and you’ll see that he’s praising Zohran, not denouncing him. Smearing the only Jewish candidate in the race of being a treacherous backstabber is not a good look.

Literally just watch the next 20 seconds in the video and you’ll see that he’s praising Zohran, not denouncing him. Smearing the only Jewish candidate in the race of being a treacherous backstabber is not a good look.

Sam Weinberg

179,174 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: News should be decentralized. “We need to allow the people to develop the narratives that are of interest to them. It's possible for news to be technically truthful, but they're still deciding what the narrative is. Let's say you took a photo of someone and they had a little zit. Now you could zoom in on the zit and make it look gigantic, like Mount Vesuvius. And it is still true that they have a zit. It's just not the size of Mount Vesuvius. It doesn't properly reflect their face. Their face is not one giant zit. But you could say, well, it's true. But have they lied? They've just happened to zoom in on the zit and not look at the rest of the face. What I'm saying is that choice of narrative is extremely important. And at the point at which if there's only half a dozen editors-in-chief or maybe even fewer than that, maybe it's only three or four that are deciding what the narrative is, what's going to be on the front page, then, that's a form of manipulation of public opinion I think the public often doesn't appreciate and is perhaps the most pernicious of all.” From: Interview with Tucker Carlson, April 19, 2023

Elon Musk: News should be decentralized. “We need to allow the people to develop the narratives that are of interest to them. It's possible for news to be technically truthful, but they're still deciding what the narrative is. Let's say you took a photo of someone and they had a little zit. Now you could zoom in on the zit and make it look gigantic, like Mount Vesuvius. And it is still true that they have a zit. It's just not the size of Mount Vesuvius. It doesn't properly reflect their face. Their face is not one giant zit. But you could say, well, it's true. But have they lied? They've just happened to zoom in on the zit and not look at the rest of the face. What I'm saying is that choice of narrative is extremely important. And at the point at which if there's only half a dozen editors-in-chief or maybe even fewer than that, maybe it's only three or four that are deciding what the narrative is, what's going to be on the front page, then, that's a form of manipulation of public opinion I think the public often doesn't appreciate and is perhaps the most pernicious of all.” From: Interview with Tucker Carlson, April 19, 2023

ELON CLIPS

17,166 次观看 • 6 个月前

Meta’s Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang just put a five-year countdown on the most consequential race in human history. Wang: “Mark and myself, we very strongly believe that this is a very special time in human history.” Not a decade. Not a generation. Five years. Wang: “The discoveries made over the next half-decade are going to be some of the most monumental discoveries that human civilization has ever made.” To run that race, Meta didn’t just build a new model. They built an entirely new division from scratch. Meta Superintelligence Labs. Designed from a blank slate. Singular focus. Wang: “What does the optimal team look like for the future of superintelligence?” The bottleneck to superintelligence isn’t compute anymore. It isn’t data. It’s the density of human genius in a single room. Wang: “Highest talent density. Bring the very best people together and build the best possible environment for them.” The AI arms race has shifted from hoarding GPUs to hoarding the smartest minds on earth. The first company to perfect that organizational structure will be the first company to reach superintelligence. But reaching it is only half the battle. Deploying what you built to the world is the other half. And here is where Meta’s advantage becomes almost unfair. Wang: “Three and a half billion people utilize our platforms every single day.” While every other AI lab is still trying to figure out how to get users to adopt their technology, Meta already has nearly half the planet locked into their ecosystem. MSL wasn’t built just to achieve scientific breakthroughs. Wang: “Build the products that will enable this technology to be deployed to billions and billions of people worldwide.” Whoever builds superintelligence first wins the race. Whoever distributes it to 3.5 billion people controls what comes after. Meta is positioning to do both.

Meta’s Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang just put a five-year countdown on the most consequential race in human history. Wang: “Mark and myself, we very strongly believe that this is a very special time in human history.” Not a decade. Not a generation. Five years. Wang: “The discoveries made over the next half-decade are going to be some of the most monumental discoveries that human civilization has ever made.” To run that race, Meta didn’t just build a new model. They built an entirely new division from scratch. Meta Superintelligence Labs. Designed from a blank slate. Singular focus. Wang: “What does the optimal team look like for the future of superintelligence?” The bottleneck to superintelligence isn’t compute anymore. It isn’t data. It’s the density of human genius in a single room. Wang: “Highest talent density. Bring the very best people together and build the best possible environment for them.” The AI arms race has shifted from hoarding GPUs to hoarding the smartest minds on earth. The first company to perfect that organizational structure will be the first company to reach superintelligence. But reaching it is only half the battle. Deploying what you built to the world is the other half. And here is where Meta’s advantage becomes almost unfair. Wang: “Three and a half billion people utilize our platforms every single day.” While every other AI lab is still trying to figure out how to get users to adopt their technology, Meta already has nearly half the planet locked into their ecosystem. MSL wasn’t built just to achieve scientific breakthroughs. Wang: “Build the products that will enable this technology to be deployed to billions and billions of people worldwide.” Whoever builds superintelligence first wins the race. Whoever distributes it to 3.5 billion people controls what comes after. Meta is positioning to do both.

Dustin

32,982 次观看 • 4 个月前

It is not just the media & politicians that have BLOOD on their hands One of our national security agencies has ONLY NOW, post-Belfast, declared migrants are a NATIONAL SECURITY risk Watch our hard-hitting show: In this clip David Oldroyd-Bolt skewers those in charge: "The frequency of these atrocities, the severity of them, & the unbridled BLOODLUST of those committing them, demonstrates that "this is NOT a problem of integration or assimilation or isolated instances of migrants with axes to grind. "This is a general systemic problem. "I think the fact that the national security agency has only just, in the past two days, said that immigration is a problem is not just bolting the door after the horse has bolted. "It's bolting the stable door when the horse bolted, gone off, found pasture, sired foals, and has died a long natural death. "It is absolutely absurd that the people WE PAY to look out on our behalf for these kind of threats are ONLY JUST stating in public that mass migration is the greatest single threat to national security."

It is not just the media & politicians that have BLOOD on their hands One of our national security agencies has ONLY NOW, post-Belfast, declared migrants are a NATIONAL SECURITY risk Watch our hard-hitting show: In this clip David Oldroyd-Bolt skewers those in charge: "The frequency of these atrocities, the severity of them, & the unbridled BLOODLUST of those committing them, demonstrates that "this is NOT a problem of integration or assimilation or isolated instances of migrants with axes to grind. "This is a general systemic problem. "I think the fact that the national security agency has only just, in the past two days, said that immigration is a problem is not just bolting the door after the horse has bolted. "It's bolting the stable door when the horse bolted, gone off, found pasture, sired foals, and has died a long natural death. "It is absolutely absurd that the people WE PAY to look out on our behalf for these kind of threats are ONLY JUST stating in public that mass migration is the greatest single threat to national security."

The New Culture Forum

13,599 次观看 • 1 个月前

Brilliantly crafted series of eight six-second ads — Yes, just six seconds each! — for WD-40, a multi-use home improvement product, by the agency Sideways Consulting. The product, in itself, seems very useful for a wide variety of applications, but the agency's writing does not stop with merely depicting use-cases alone. That would have made for a simple functional ad series where we applaud the product itself for being versatile. Where the agency's writing shines is to infuse an element of surprise even within the six-second duration! The last two seconds of each ad has something unexpected that makes the series more interesting than what it is. Because of this, the ad series itself becomes versatile and entertaining, going beyond showcasing the product's versatility. #advertising #marketing #creativity #creative

Brilliantly crafted series of eight six-second ads — Yes, just six seconds each! — for WD-40, a multi-use home improvement product, by the agency Sideways Consulting. The product, in itself, seems very useful for a wide variety of applications, but the agency's writing does not stop with merely depicting use-cases alone. That would have made for a simple functional ad series where we applaud the product itself for being versatile. Where the agency's writing shines is to infuse an element of surprise even within the six-second duration! The last two seconds of each ad has something unexpected that makes the series more interesting than what it is. Because of this, the ad series itself becomes versatile and entertaining, going beyond showcasing the product's versatility. #advertising #marketing #creativity #creative

Karthik 🇮🇳

76,973 次观看 • 1 年前