Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨PAULA DEVLIN ON HOLDING LINDSAY CLANCY “ACCOUNTABLE” In this clip, Paula explains how voting Not Guilty Reason of Insanity “still holds Lindsay accountable” because “you know, that still gives her the help that she needed. It still keeps her under watch. I mean she’s still on a 24-hour suicide...

TheLinzerShow's profile picture

Lindsay 🇺🇸

18,161 subscribers

33,101 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaSağlık & İyilikKomedi
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

34 Yorum

MAGA Lorrie Ann 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇸 AMERICA FIRST profil fotoğrafı
MAGA Lorrie Ann 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇸 AMERICA FIRST9 gün önce

Every one of those jurors except for the holdout should be held in contempt of court for not doing the job as a juror correctly. They were completely biased. Not one single one of them was neutral at all or even listened to the evidence. They're all on Lindsay's side and trying to help her and that is not the job of a juror!

Nancy profil fotoğrafı
Nancy9 gün önce

Everyone has heard enough from Paula. Somehow Paula has made the deaths of Cora, Dawson and Callan about her feelings.

sf nooner profil fotoğrafı
sf nooner9 gün önce

Why is this piece of crap still in front of a camera?

Fourit profil fotoğrafı
Fourit9 gün önce

The best help for Lindsay Clancy is to remain in prison indefinitely and receive mental health treatment while incarcerated. What would stop her from having more children if she is ever released? The thought of that is scary.

Sara profil fotoğrafı
Sara9 gün önce

I would lose my mind being stuck in a jury room with her for weeks

Matt Ronald profil fotoğrafı
Matt Ronald9 gün önce

Is this bitch gonna be on Dancing with the Stars next? Jeez!

Lynn Webster profil fotoğrafı
Lynn Webster9 gün önce

What a circus it must have been in that jury room. Poor woman is under suicide watch after strangling her own children one by one…torturous death. The children fought back. But that doesn’t matter….she needs help. 🤡🤡

Ida profil fotoğrafı
Ida9 gün önce

I agree that this is totally insane. It has jury misconduct written all over it, in my opinion.

Melania’s Revenge profil fotoğrafı
Melania’s Revenge9 gün önce

Hang on a minute, am I confused?! They were they to determine if she was guilty of murdering her children. They weren’t there to determine her treatment plan. And her being on suicide watch has no baring on what she did 3yrs ago! Am I wrong?

Writer, CR HIATT profil fotoğrafı
Writer, CR HIATT9 gün önce

She's an activist, not a juror.

⚓️Hooyah Navy/Shipmate for life🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
⚓️Hooyah Navy/Shipmate for life🇺🇸9 gün önce

This twit would have found Jodi Arias not guilty.

MAHA_USA profil fotoğrafı
MAHA_USA9 gün önce

Paula just needs to shut up!

Informatics profil fotoğrafı
Informatics9 gün önce

There is no world in which a man,whether mentally ill will kill all his children and thousands of man come rallying together to support him.That world doesn't exist. How women are able to do this remains a mystery to me.

loveallmyanimals profil fotoğrafı
loveallmyanimals9 gün önce

Infuriating

Daffan profil fotoğrafı
Daffan9 gün önce

Honestly, I was more sympathetic before the media tour.

Eloniaisachomo profil fotoğrafı
Eloniaisachomo9 gün önce

this cunt needs to go to hell where she came from with her womansplain retardation

Informatics profil fotoğrafı
Informatics9 gün önce

Some people hate accountability. Somebody kills their children in cold blood and somehow we have to find excuses to let them go free.Crazy world.

BT profil fotoğrafı
BT9 gün önce

Clancy was the most privileged person in human history…she had everything any person could ever ask for, but she needed MORE from society to prevent her from strangling her children.

LucilleJean profil fotoğrafı
LucilleJean9 gün önce

Why aren’t Paula and her friends advocating for more people in prison who need to get released to get help??

YungBank profil fotoğrafı
YungBank9 gün önce

The charge was first degree murder and who killed them? She just said Lindsey killed them so reasonable doubt is GONE! Lindsey hearing voices telling her to do this is IRRELEVANT.. i hear voices telling me to QUIT MY JOB but if i DO IT id be BROKE AND HOMELESS

Weebutmighty profil fotoğrafı
Weebutmighty9 gün önce

Its quite insane. When will anyone give this one a box of donuts to keep her quiet for at least an hour ?

SHARI profil fotoğrafı
SHARI9 gün önce

Every time this dingleberry speaks my admiration for that lone juror increases.

Nothing profil fotoğrafı
Nothing9 gün önce

Paula. The whole fucking nation hates you bitch

Ben Rogers profil fotoğrafı
Ben Rogers9 gün önce

The "help she needs" is to wheel her onto the gallows and put the noose around her neck.

Right, Always Right profil fotoğrafı
Right, Always Right9 gün önce

If she's suicidal. Why isn't she begging for the death penalty?

Ivelisse profil fotoğrafı
Ivelisse9 gün önce

This woman is infuriating. I would have gone bald pulling my hair if I was stuck in that jury room with her and the other 2 nutcases.

AlexSOC profil fotoğrafı
AlexSOC9 gün önce

The 11 jurors wanted not guilty because they were considering the sentence and Lindsay’s physical condition. They did their job incorrectly.

Timothy S. Kraus profil fotoğrafı
Timothy S. Kraus9 gün önce

If the murderous broad were locked up for life, it wouldn't need any help. Ain't going nowhere. What's the point?

Anthony profil fotoğrafı
Anthony9 gün önce

"Shhh - we're not here to discuss that." Sound logic

Soule Soufflé profil fotoğrafı
Soule Soufflé9 gün önce

“We all….” Paula how did deliberation go in your own mind….???

Buddha Philly profil fotoğrafı
Buddha Philly9 gün önce

Paula has Main Character syndrome and is making the murder of 3 kids, her personal narrative story White liberal women are the ANTICHRIST

Kate B profil fotoğrafı
Kate B9 gün önce

@OhMelodylane She’ll receive treatment in prison, where she belongs.

Dobermom profil fotoğrafı
Dobermom9 gün önce

She loves the attention.

Julia profil fotoğrafı
Julia9 gün önce

When is this camera whoring crone with a side pony going to exit stage left?

Benzer Videolar

Another painful interview with one of the Lindsay Clancy jurors, Paula Devlin. Fourth interview I’ve seen with her thus far. It’s extremely concerning to hear her say these things: “At the declaration of a mistrial, she feels like she failed Lindsay.” “Our verdict that the 11 of us decided in was Not guilty by mental illness.” -No ma’am, that’s not a verdict. “We really feel like Lindsay needs to get the help she needs to get JUSTICE FOR THE CHILDREN.” Wow. Just wow. It gets worse and worse.
1:29

Another painful interview with one of the Lindsay Clancy jurors, Paula Devlin. Fourth interview I’ve seen with her thus far. It’s extremely concerning to hear her say these things: “At the declaration of a mistrial, she feels like she failed Lindsay.” “Our verdict that the 11 of us decided in was Not guilty by mental illness.” -No ma’am, that’s not a verdict. “We really feel like Lindsay needs to get the help she needs to get JUSTICE FOR THE CHILDREN.” Wow. Just wow. It gets worse and worse.

Lindsay 🇺🇸

71,203 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

🚨 NEW THURSDAY MORNING- PAULA DEVLIN SAYS LINDSAY CLANCY DOESN’T DESERVE JAIL At this point, what are we on — interview number 8? 🪏 🕳️ NBC 10 WJAR posted another new preview this morning from Paula Devlin’s sit-down with Nicole Moeder. When Kevin Reddington’s position that he would not agree to jail time for Lindsay came up, Paula said: “I don’t think she deserves that. We believe she was in a psychosis. She didn’t know what she was doing. Now she does.” She also says, again, that Lindsay needs help so “this never happens again.” Paula has been very consistent about where she stands. We have heard it. Repeatedly. NBC 10 WJAR Source:
1:03

🚨 NEW THURSDAY MORNING- PAULA DEVLIN SAYS LINDSAY CLANCY DOESN’T DESERVE JAIL At this point, what are we on — interview number 8? 🪏 🕳️ NBC 10 WJAR posted another new preview this morning from Paula Devlin’s sit-down with Nicole Moeder. When Kevin Reddington’s position that he would not agree to jail time for Lindsay came up, Paula said: “I don’t think she deserves that. We believe she was in a psychosis. She didn’t know what she was doing. Now she does.” She also says, again, that Lindsay needs help so “this never happens again.” Paula has been very consistent about where she stands. We have heard it. Repeatedly. NBC 10 WJAR Source:

Lindsay 🇺🇸

17,988 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

🚨BREAKING: LINDSAY CLANCY JUROR CONTINUES OUT-DUMB HERSELF. “ The evidence showed us that she was under a tremendous amount of anxiety, stress, depression, all those things. Like, the testimony talking about all those things made so much sense.” “Like, we talked about the lack of evidence. There was nothing that could show us that she had any animosity towards her children, towards her husband, towards her family as a unit.” Also Paula thinks the evidence proves that Lindsay Clancy was in psychosis, despite that not even mattering if she was. But no, the evidence points to the opposite. NBC 10 WJAR Full:
3:03

🚨BREAKING: LINDSAY CLANCY JUROR CONTINUES OUT-DUMB HERSELF. “ The evidence showed us that she was under a tremendous amount of anxiety, stress, depression, all those things. Like, the testimony talking about all those things made so much sense.” “Like, we talked about the lack of evidence. There was nothing that could show us that she had any animosity towards her children, towards her husband, towards her family as a unit.” Also Paula thinks the evidence proves that Lindsay Clancy was in psychosis, despite that not even mattering if she was. But no, the evidence points to the opposite. NBC 10 WJAR Full:

Lindsay 🇺🇸

47,480 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

These juror interviews are fucking unbelievable. Not “concerning.” Not “disappointing.” Un-fucking-believable. These people sat in front of cameras and damn near confessed that they threw the law in the trash because they felt sorry for Lindsay Clancy. One juror admits she originally thought Clancy was guilty, then flipped her vote because she wanted “Lindsay to get the help she needs.” Help. You were not empaneled to run a fucking wellness spa. You were not there to hold her hand, book her a therapist, or make sure she landed somewhere soft. Your job was one thing: decide whether she was legally guilty based on the evidence in that courtroom. That was it. Not mercy. Not treatment. Not “she seems sad.” Guilt. If you thought she was guilty and changed your vote because you wanted her to “get help,” you did not follow the law. You replaced the law with your feelings. You should never have been in that box. Then another juror somehow found a dumber lane. She complained that prosecutors never brought in “character witnesses” to prove Clancy was a “bad mother.” What the fuck was she waiting for? A neighbor to take the stand and say, “Yeah, she was a nightmare at PTA and her casserole sucked”? She killed her three children. If that does not at least twitch a neuron in the “maybe not Mother of the Year” department, I do not know what testimony this juror was shopping for. And here’s the part that makes it even more asinine: prosecutors generally cannot just parade people in to say the defendant is a piece of shit. That kind of character dump can get tossed as prejudicial and irrelevant. So this genius punished the state for not introducing evidence they may not even have been allowed to introduce. You could not write stupidity this clean. Then she made it worse. The same juror called it a “fact” that Clancy “viciously killed her children.” Viciously. Her word. And after accepting that Clancy viciously killed three kids, she still landed on not guilty. At that point words are dead. Facts are dead. The law is dead. You are just throwing emotional glitter around a courtroom and calling it justice. Another juror gushed about how “entertaining” the defense attorney was. Entertaining. Maybe next time they can pass out scorecards. Ten for charm. Eight for stage presence. Extra credit if counsel keeps the room giggling between autopsy photos. Then there was the juror who said “everything” in the case proved Clancy loved her children. Everything. Apparently “everything” includes strangling them to death. That little detail did not put so much as a dent in the grand theory of maternal devotion. These people do not sound like jurors. They sound like eleven random drunks pulled out of an airport bar and told to invent a legal system after three margaritas. By their own mouths, some of them were deciding whether she needed treatment, whether she seemed like a nice mom, whether her lawyer was fun to watch, and whether they personally felt bad for her. Those were not the questions. The question was guilt. They had one fucking job. And now they are on camera explaining, in their own words, how completely they wandered off and pissed on it. Absolutely fucking unbelievable. Thank god that one dude had the balls to stand up to these fucking dumbfucks!
2:19

These juror interviews are fucking unbelievable. Not “concerning.” Not “disappointing.” Un-fucking-believable. These people sat in front of cameras and damn near confessed that they threw the law in the trash because they felt sorry for Lindsay Clancy. One juror admits she originally thought Clancy was guilty, then flipped her vote because she wanted “Lindsay to get the help she needs.” Help. You were not empaneled to run a fucking wellness spa. You were not there to hold her hand, book her a therapist, or make sure she landed somewhere soft. Your job was one thing: decide whether she was legally guilty based on the evidence in that courtroom. That was it. Not mercy. Not treatment. Not “she seems sad.” Guilt. If you thought she was guilty and changed your vote because you wanted her to “get help,” you did not follow the law. You replaced the law with your feelings. You should never have been in that box. Then another juror somehow found a dumber lane. She complained that prosecutors never brought in “character witnesses” to prove Clancy was a “bad mother.” What the fuck was she waiting for? A neighbor to take the stand and say, “Yeah, she was a nightmare at PTA and her casserole sucked”? She killed her three children. If that does not at least twitch a neuron in the “maybe not Mother of the Year” department, I do not know what testimony this juror was shopping for. And here’s the part that makes it even more asinine: prosecutors generally cannot just parade people in to say the defendant is a piece of shit. That kind of character dump can get tossed as prejudicial and irrelevant. So this genius punished the state for not introducing evidence they may not even have been allowed to introduce. You could not write stupidity this clean. Then she made it worse. The same juror called it a “fact” that Clancy “viciously killed her children.” Viciously. Her word. And after accepting that Clancy viciously killed three kids, she still landed on not guilty. At that point words are dead. Facts are dead. The law is dead. You are just throwing emotional glitter around a courtroom and calling it justice. Another juror gushed about how “entertaining” the defense attorney was. Entertaining. Maybe next time they can pass out scorecards. Ten for charm. Eight for stage presence. Extra credit if counsel keeps the room giggling between autopsy photos. Then there was the juror who said “everything” in the case proved Clancy loved her children. Everything. Apparently “everything” includes strangling them to death. That little detail did not put so much as a dent in the grand theory of maternal devotion. These people do not sound like jurors. They sound like eleven random drunks pulled out of an airport bar and told to invent a legal system after three margaritas. By their own mouths, some of them were deciding whether she needed treatment, whether she seemed like a nice mom, whether her lawyer was fun to watch, and whether they personally felt bad for her. Those were not the questions. The question was guilt. They had one fucking job. And now they are on camera explaining, in their own words, how completely they wandered off and pissed on it. Absolutely fucking unbelievable. Thank god that one dude had the balls to stand up to these fucking dumbfucks!

Flopping Aces

248,983 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

Whoopi Goldberg is now blaming the patriarchy and sexism for Lindsay Clancy. She says people do not believe women. Sunny Hostin backs her, stating studies show women get dismissed more on pain. Fine. Let’s pretend that is all true. What does it have to do with Clancy? She had three doctors and access to 15-plus medications. She did not have a problem finding healthcare. She had a problem murdering three of her children. This is what a lot of women in that media lane keep doing. Hunt every angle to justify her. In the end, Clancy is the victim and the kids are a footnote. No. She is a murderer who should be held accountable.
1:31

Whoopi Goldberg is now blaming the patriarchy and sexism for Lindsay Clancy. She says people do not believe women. Sunny Hostin backs her, stating studies show women get dismissed more on pain. Fine. Let’s pretend that is all true. What does it have to do with Clancy? She had three doctors and access to 15-plus medications. She did not have a problem finding healthcare. She had a problem murdering three of her children. This is what a lot of women in that media lane keep doing. Hunt every angle to justify her. In the end, Clancy is the victim and the kids are a footnote. No. She is a murderer who should be held accountable.

DeVory Darkins

85,579 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

AFP’s Danny Kemp: “Mr. Vice President, you presumably watched the video yourself. There’s not the slightest doubt in your mind, having viewed it, that this the victim — you still believe that she deliberately tried to ram him despite despite seeing this video?” Vice President JD Vance JD Vance: “Look, I don’t know what it’s in a person’s heart or in a person’s head. And obviously, we’re not going to get the chance to ask this woman what was going on. What I am certain of is that she violated the law. What I am certain of is that that officer had every reason to think that he was under very serious threat for injury, or in fact, his life. What is I’m certain of that she accelerated in a way where she ran into the guy. I don’t know what was in her heart and what was in her head, but I know that she violated the law, and I know that officer was acting in self-defense. That’s raises an interesting point, though. Look, if people want to say that we should have a legitimate debate about, you know, what was she really doing, right? Was she panicking when she drove into this officer, or was she actually trying to ram him? That’s a — that’s a reasonable conversation. What’s not reasonable is for so many of you to plaster all over the media that this was an innocent woman and that the ICE agent committed murder, which is what many of you have said explicitly, and some of you have said implicitly. That’s what I have an objection to. The idea that this was not justified is absurd and I think everybody knows it in their heart.”
1:24

AFP’s Danny Kemp: “Mr. Vice President, you presumably watched the video yourself. There’s not the slightest doubt in your mind, having viewed it, that this the victim — you still believe that she deliberately tried to ram him despite despite seeing this video?” Vice President JD Vance JD Vance: “Look, I don’t know what it’s in a person’s heart or in a person’s head. And obviously, we’re not going to get the chance to ask this woman what was going on. What I am certain of is that she violated the law. What I am certain of is that that officer had every reason to think that he was under very serious threat for injury, or in fact, his life. What is I’m certain of that she accelerated in a way where she ran into the guy. I don’t know what was in her heart and what was in her head, but I know that she violated the law, and I know that officer was acting in self-defense. That’s raises an interesting point, though. Look, if people want to say that we should have a legitimate debate about, you know, what was she really doing, right? Was she panicking when she drove into this officer, or was she actually trying to ram him? That’s a — that’s a reasonable conversation. What’s not reasonable is for so many of you to plaster all over the media that this was an innocent woman and that the ICE agent committed murder, which is what many of you have said explicitly, and some of you have said implicitly. That’s what I have an objection to. The idea that this was not justified is absurd and I think everybody knows it in their heart.”

Curtis Houck

19,488 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Patrick Clancy asked Lindsay if she planned the murder of their 3 kids. Lindsay told him, “No. It was just like the snap of the fingers.” I think Patrick is still in denial that he was married to a sociopath.
1:36

Patrick Clancy asked Lindsay if she planned the murder of their 3 kids. Lindsay told him, “No. It was just like the snap of the fingers.” I think Patrick is still in denial that he was married to a sociopath.

Morgan Ariel

83,623 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

“The medical system absolutely failed Lindsay Clancy.” The View standing with Clancy is just the icing on the cake. I fail to grasp this idea that “oh well she tried to get help a whole bunch so…now she’s justified in murdering her kids and can’t be held responsible”??? I don’t care if you tried to get help a thousand times. Try one thousand and one times before you murder innocent people. Lock yourself in a damn bathroom if that’s what it takes. Leave your kids with a neighbor until help arrives; no matter what, they’ll be better off there than with you. This stuff about “but she tried and no one listened!” is nonsense, and it’s not supported by the evidence or common sense.
2:25

“The medical system absolutely failed Lindsay Clancy.” The View standing with Clancy is just the icing on the cake. I fail to grasp this idea that “oh well she tried to get help a whole bunch so…now she’s justified in murdering her kids and can’t be held responsible”??? I don’t care if you tried to get help a thousand times. Try one thousand and one times before you murder innocent people. Lock yourself in a damn bathroom if that’s what it takes. Leave your kids with a neighbor until help arrives; no matter what, they’ll be better off there than with you. This stuff about “but she tried and no one listened!” is nonsense, and it’s not supported by the evidence or common sense.

Natalie Jean Beisner

19,974 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

Lindsay Clancy There is not one scintilla of proof that indicates that Lindsay's husband, Patrick, killed their children. The opposite is true. Every fact points to Lindsay, and in fact, she admits murdering them by strangling them with her exercise bands, one by one... The question at hand is: Why? Did she have a psychotic break or did she kill her children because she could not handle the strain and pressures she felt any longer and wanted to die and to take her children with her? What role did her medications have in her decision making? As of today, not one medical expert has testified that Lindsay had any signs of psychosis. We shall see what her hired expert has to say. Continuing to advocate for her children. They have no voice. They had no way to resist being strangled to death by their mother. Think about that kind of death. Think about what it would take to murder your children slowly and methodically in this way. It was not quick. Callan did not die for days. Why did she cut herself and jump if she didn't know what she did was wrong? Hoping her expert sheds some light on a case that is so very dark. #LindsayClancy Video credit: ChristyfromTO
0:25

Lindsay Clancy There is not one scintilla of proof that indicates that Lindsay's husband, Patrick, killed their children. The opposite is true. Every fact points to Lindsay, and in fact, she admits murdering them by strangling them with her exercise bands, one by one... The question at hand is: Why? Did she have a psychotic break or did she kill her children because she could not handle the strain and pressures she felt any longer and wanted to die and to take her children with her? What role did her medications have in her decision making? As of today, not one medical expert has testified that Lindsay had any signs of psychosis. We shall see what her hired expert has to say. Continuing to advocate for her children. They have no voice. They had no way to resist being strangled to death by their mother. Think about that kind of death. Think about what it would take to murder your children slowly and methodically in this way. It was not quick. Callan did not die for days. Why did she cut herself and jump if she didn't know what she did was wrong? Hoping her expert sheds some light on a case that is so very dark. #LindsayClancy Video credit: ChristyfromTO

Jennifer Coffindaffer

25,477 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

If Lindsay Clancy told her attorney that she was abused throughout her entire marriage and he never used that as evidence in this trial than he should be disbarred. And why was there no evidence of any abuse brought up at all? You're telling me out of all of the investigations that there was, he's so good at abuse that there is absolutely zero evidence of any abuse? They are just making things up. I don't think they even bothered to watch the trial. Because if all of these women are right then every single person involved should lose their careers.
0:32

If Lindsay Clancy told her attorney that she was abused throughout her entire marriage and he never used that as evidence in this trial than he should be disbarred. And why was there no evidence of any abuse brought up at all? You're telling me out of all of the investigations that there was, he's so good at abuse that there is absolutely zero evidence of any abuse? They are just making things up. I don't think they even bothered to watch the trial. Because if all of these women are right then every single person involved should lose their careers.

MAGA Lorrie Ann 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇸 AMERICA FIRST

20,200 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

Bill Maher can't understand why Lindsay Clancy has so many "fans" outside the courthouse after she killed her three kids. He says it's "a little like Luigi." He asks an MSNBC contributor to explain why women are rallying behind her. Then he shares his own theory. BILL MAHER: “I just want to ask — this woman Lindsay Clancy, she killed her three children because she had postpartum depression. What I learned is that this is a very prevalent thing. It’s very real. I absolutely don’t think she knew what she was doing. I get that. What I don’t get is why does she have fans? There are so many women now who are, like, outside the courthouse. It’s a little like Luigi. I understand the frustration. Don’t understand why the fans. And is it just because this has been a cause célèbre that has gone under the radar for so long?” MOLLY JONG-FAST: “So my guess is that postpartum psychosis, which is what she had, is very real. I mean, it’s not so common, but it happens. And I think that a lot of women — this has sort of brought up postpartum psychosis as a topic. “The reporting on this story is horrific. Like, she keeps putting herself in mental institutions. She goes to McLean. She’s a labor and delivery nurse. So if there ever were a person who knows about postpartum care, it would be her. In the reporting, it says she doesn’t want to report how bad her symptoms are because she’s worried she’s going to lose her kids. It is one of the worst stories ever. And in my mind — you know, she’s paralyzed now. And so she’s in this wheelchair. I’m not sure that the courts are the answer to a problem like that.” MAHER: “Okay, but if we move away from just this extreme version... not a lot of women go to the length of killing their kid, but a lot of them are not afraid to say, ‘I don’t like being a mom.’ They put up TikToks just talking about it, and they seem to be just frustrated with what... mothers just expected was going to happen when you’re having a kid.”
2:03

Bill Maher can't understand why Lindsay Clancy has so many "fans" outside the courthouse after she killed her three kids. He says it's "a little like Luigi." He asks an MSNBC contributor to explain why women are rallying behind her. Then he shares his own theory. BILL MAHER: “I just want to ask — this woman Lindsay Clancy, she killed her three children because she had postpartum depression. What I learned is that this is a very prevalent thing. It’s very real. I absolutely don’t think she knew what she was doing. I get that. What I don’t get is why does she have fans? There are so many women now who are, like, outside the courthouse. It’s a little like Luigi. I understand the frustration. Don’t understand why the fans. And is it just because this has been a cause célèbre that has gone under the radar for so long?” MOLLY JONG-FAST: “So my guess is that postpartum psychosis, which is what she had, is very real. I mean, it’s not so common, but it happens. And I think that a lot of women — this has sort of brought up postpartum psychosis as a topic. “The reporting on this story is horrific. Like, she keeps putting herself in mental institutions. She goes to McLean. She’s a labor and delivery nurse. So if there ever were a person who knows about postpartum care, it would be her. In the reporting, it says she doesn’t want to report how bad her symptoms are because she’s worried she’s going to lose her kids. It is one of the worst stories ever. And in my mind — you know, she’s paralyzed now. And so she’s in this wheelchair. I’m not sure that the courts are the answer to a problem like that.” MAHER: “Okay, but if we move away from just this extreme version... not a lot of women go to the length of killing their kid, but a lot of them are not afraid to say, ‘I don’t like being a mom.’ They put up TikToks just talking about it, and they seem to be just frustrated with what... mothers just expected was going to happen when you’re having a kid.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

293,759 görüntüleme • 29 gün önce

Extended Interview Clips with NBC10 Boston: Kellie Farina, Juror: “We were appreciative that Kevin didn’t delay the trial two more weeks with what you know, bringing in other doctors. I mean, you could only listen to so much of that. Kevin was really, really shot from his heart. Um, again, the prosecution had no witness to question her credibility. He brought all these people in, people that lived her: Family, her in-laws, I mean, even Patrick was very compassionate. So we just really appreciated the fact that he didnt just delay and drag it on with more medical BS and get more to the point of WHO LINDSAY WAS AND WHAT HER LIFE WAS LIKE.” I’m sorry, did I hear this correctly? They just wanted to hear “who Lindsay was and what her life was like?” Is that what we’re doing here? Is that what this trial is about? Unreal. Sue O'Connell: COMMENTATOR, not a reporter NBC10 Boston Full extended Interview:
1:26

Extended Interview Clips with NBC10 Boston: Kellie Farina, Juror: “We were appreciative that Kevin didn’t delay the trial two more weeks with what you know, bringing in other doctors. I mean, you could only listen to so much of that. Kevin was really, really shot from his heart. Um, again, the prosecution had no witness to question her credibility. He brought all these people in, people that lived her: Family, her in-laws, I mean, even Patrick was very compassionate. So we just really appreciated the fact that he didnt just delay and drag it on with more medical BS and get more to the point of WHO LINDSAY WAS AND WHAT HER LIFE WAS LIKE.” I’m sorry, did I hear this correctly? They just wanted to hear “who Lindsay was and what her life was like?” Is that what we’re doing here? Is that what this trial is about? Unreal. Sue O'Connell: COMMENTATOR, not a reporter NBC10 Boston Full extended Interview:

Lindsay 🇺🇸

467,157 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

Sunny Hostin and Kara Swisher cat fight over the press confronting Trump of criticizing reporters: SUNNY HOSTIN: But I also take a bit of umbrage at the other reporters there because - By the way, the other reporters weren't smiling. The men weren't smiling. He didn't mention that. But I do feel that when you -- when one of your colleagues is attacked in that way, a follow-up question should have been or a statement, someone in the room, maybe one of the men should have said, 'sir, you should not speak to her that way.' I would have liked to have seen that. [Applause] KARA SWISHER: I'm going to disagree with you because I think the job of reporters is not to react to that kind of nonsense. Right? The story -- the whole thing is when you're a reporter, the story shouldn't be about you. And when it is, it's a mistake. HOSTIN: That is true. SARA HAINES: When you're a good reporter. SWISHER: When you're a good reporter. {laughter] Well yeah, that's fair. But it's really hard. I mean, one of the things, I know Kaitlan really well. He attacks Maggie Haberman, a whole bunch of people I know really well. And to react is the really -- is where you lose in that game because with these people everything -- every accusation is a confession, so what he is saying is about him and not about her. And I thought she handled it well. She has to be absolutely -- she made a joke about Alabama which is fantastic. But the minute you say something, you get dragged into it in a way that he benefits and you don't. HOSTIN: What about the other reporters, do you think that maybe they should have said - SWISHER: No, nobody should say anything. HOSTIN: Because I think this administration is so aberrant, I think they are so - it's just such an abnormal situation. I don't know that you play by the rules that we used to play by. SWISHER: Because that becomes the story then, the fight between him and her. HOSITN: Although, it's already the story. SWISHER: No, it's not because she then asked a question. By the way, what was really interesting is she hadn't asked a question. HOSTIN: She had not. SWISHER: But she then got in a question in about the slush fund and then he answered in a very different way from Todd Blanche. She got what she needed which was the news. She got the news.
1:56

Sunny Hostin and Kara Swisher cat fight over the press confronting Trump of criticizing reporters: SUNNY HOSTIN: But I also take a bit of umbrage at the other reporters there because - By the way, the other reporters weren't smiling. The men weren't smiling. He didn't mention that. But I do feel that when you -- when one of your colleagues is attacked in that way, a follow-up question should have been or a statement, someone in the room, maybe one of the men should have said, 'sir, you should not speak to her that way.' I would have liked to have seen that. [Applause] KARA SWISHER: I'm going to disagree with you because I think the job of reporters is not to react to that kind of nonsense. Right? The story -- the whole thing is when you're a reporter, the story shouldn't be about you. And when it is, it's a mistake. HOSTIN: That is true. SARA HAINES: When you're a good reporter. SWISHER: When you're a good reporter. {laughter] Well yeah, that's fair. But it's really hard. I mean, one of the things, I know Kaitlan really well. He attacks Maggie Haberman, a whole bunch of people I know really well. And to react is the really -- is where you lose in that game because with these people everything -- every accusation is a confession, so what he is saying is about him and not about her. And I thought she handled it well. She has to be absolutely -- she made a joke about Alabama which is fantastic. But the minute you say something, you get dragged into it in a way that he benefits and you don't. HOSTIN: What about the other reporters, do you think that maybe they should have said - SWISHER: No, nobody should say anything. HOSTIN: Because I think this administration is so aberrant, I think they are so - it's just such an abnormal situation. I don't know that you play by the rules that we used to play by. SWISHER: Because that becomes the story then, the fight between him and her. HOSITN: Although, it's already the story. SWISHER: No, it's not because she then asked a question. By the way, what was really interesting is she hadn't asked a question. HOSTIN: She had not. SWISHER: But she then got in a question in about the slush fund and then he answered in a very different way from Todd Blanche. She got what she needed which was the news. She got the news.

Nicholas Fondacaro

31,100 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨#BREAKING: Three jurors from the Lindsay Clancy trial just broke their silence... and revealed exactly how one man single-handedly caused the mistrial. Eleven jurors were ready to find her not guilty by reason of insanity. One man refused, even though admitted he had the doubt... and still wouldn't sign it. She says the lone holdout, a man, acknowledged he had reasonable doubt. Her words: "He admitted he had reasonable doubt and I started filling out the forms, I was so excited." She thought it was over. She thought they finally had their verdict. And then, she says, he told the room: "But I'm still not going to say that she's not guilty by reason of insanity." Absolutely wild. GOD BLESS THAT MAN!!!!!!!
3:10

🚨#BREAKING: Three jurors from the Lindsay Clancy trial just broke their silence... and revealed exactly how one man single-handedly caused the mistrial. Eleven jurors were ready to find her not guilty by reason of insanity. One man refused, even though admitted he had the doubt... and still wouldn't sign it. She says the lone holdout, a man, acknowledged he had reasonable doubt. Her words: "He admitted he had reasonable doubt and I started filling out the forms, I was so excited." She thought it was over. She thought they finally had their verdict. And then, she says, he told the room: "But I'm still not going to say that she's not guilty by reason of insanity." Absolutely wild. GOD BLESS THAT MAN!!!!!!!

Matt Van Swol

2,413,137 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

Ma’am, not many people are saying that they “don’t believe postpartum psychosis is real.” Many of us actually DO KNOW what postpartum psychosis looks like and that is why I have a strong opinion that Lindsay Clancy was NOT suffering from any postpartum mental illness. Most of us also know that there is no indication that Lindsay Clancy was in psychosis. There’s always a strawman. It’s gotten old. ⬇️ Gayle King of CBS Mornings sat down with Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer, Kevin Reddington: “Many women were not familiar with postpartum psychosis, and they’re looking at this very differently. You know I’ve heard people say she was evil, no one’s thinking about what happened to three young children. And I look at it, and I think, people don’t understand what postpartum psychosis is. This is a real thing.”
0:59

Ma’am, not many people are saying that they “don’t believe postpartum psychosis is real.” Many of us actually DO KNOW what postpartum psychosis looks like and that is why I have a strong opinion that Lindsay Clancy was NOT suffering from any postpartum mental illness. Most of us also know that there is no indication that Lindsay Clancy was in psychosis. There’s always a strawman. It’s gotten old. ⬇️ Gayle King of CBS Mornings sat down with Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer, Kevin Reddington: “Many women were not familiar with postpartum psychosis, and they’re looking at this very differently. You know I’ve heard people say she was evil, no one’s thinking about what happened to three young children. And I look at it, and I think, people don’t understand what postpartum psychosis is. This is a real thing.”

Lindsay 🇺🇸

13,029 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

She needed the ER… and her husband said it was “inconvenient.” Let that sink in. She’s in pain, scared enough to call for help, and the one person who’s supposed to show up for her says it’s not worth the trouble. So she calls someone else. Not a stranger… but not her husband either. And in that moment, everything changes. Because you don’t forget who shows up when it matters, and who doesn’t. It’s never just about that one moment. It reveals everything about priorities, care, and what someone truly means to you. Is this something you could forgive… or is that the moment the relationship is over?
4:21

Sensitive content

She needed the ER… and her husband said it was “inconvenient.” Let that sink in. She’s in pain, scared enough to call for help, and the one person who’s supposed to show up for her says it’s not worth the trouble. So she calls someone else. Not a stranger… but not her husband either. And in that moment, everything changes. Because you don’t forget who shows up when it matters, and who doesn’t. It’s never just about that one moment. It reveals everything about priorities, care, and what someone truly means to you. Is this something you could forgive… or is that the moment the relationship is over?

Dr. CZ

54,870 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

This is a great discussion by Elon Musk at the WEF in Davos on how Optimus will help the elderly. Our population is aging rapidly. Just the other day my grandmother fell and broke her hip. She lives by herself about an hour drive from me, so it's difficult to be there all the time. She was found on the floor laying for 5 hours. The only way we knew something was wrong was because she wasn't answering the phone, we had to drive an hour to see what happened. She refuses a caregiver who lives in the neighborhood to come in and check in on her, she insists that she doesn't need help. Optimus would be a huge lifesaver for her. She can still maintain her independence and have Optimus there to help her when she needs it. Optimus can adjust its help based on her personality and observing what she needs help with so she can still feel independent and active without all the dangers that come with being nearly 90 years old.
1:12

This is a great discussion by Elon Musk at the WEF in Davos on how Optimus will help the elderly. Our population is aging rapidly. Just the other day my grandmother fell and broke her hip. She lives by herself about an hour drive from me, so it's difficult to be there all the time. She was found on the floor laying for 5 hours. The only way we knew something was wrong was because she wasn't answering the phone, we had to drive an hour to see what happened. She refuses a caregiver who lives in the neighborhood to come in and check in on her, she insists that she doesn't need help. Optimus would be a huge lifesaver for her. She can still maintain her independence and have Optimus there to help her when she needs it. Optimus can adjust its help based on her personality and observing what she needs help with so she can still feel independent and active without all the dangers that come with being nearly 90 years old.

Adam Lowisz X Meetup 🇺🇸🇵🇱🇪🇺🇬🇧🇺🇦

5,564,078 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

You’ve been lied to about Lindsay Clancy, she wasn’t some struggling mom, she was very privileged “The 8 month old baby was born. The 3 and 5 year old were in daycare full-time. Patrick took a 12 week paternity leave, and they hired a nanny to help with the newborn baby. After the 12 week leave was over, Patrick could see that Lindsay needed more help and support, so he decided to move his office into home and started working from home. So they decided they didn't need the nanny anymore because Patrick was gonna stay home, and you guys are saying that this woman had no support? That is false. A key factor that you guys are missing of this whole entire thing, and you're letting this woman play on your emotions, she was a labor and delivery nurse herself. She was in this career path. Lindsay knew, she knew, if I tell my doctors that I am hearing voices and having thoughts of harming my children, they're going to be taken away from me. She knew that. She is smart, she's calculated, and this was premeditated. Any woman going through actual psychosis, especially with the career path she was in, being very educated on this, she would have gone to her doctors and said, "I need them away from me because I think I'm gonna kill them." She didn't do that. Why? Because she wanted the opportunity to kill her three kids. She Googled how to kill. She Googled how long it would take Patrick to go from the house to the restaurant. She murdered one child. Patrick called. She missed the call. She called back after killing one child and said, "We're good here. Everything's fine. We're fine."’ She also gives an excellent medicine breakdown on how there is no way she was actually in the state of mind she claims to be “You guys are letting a very smart and calculated woman manipulate you and play on your emotions, and it's working, and a jury really might let her walk because… it's scary” And now we have a mistrial…. The only correction here is the children were in preschool not daycare but either way they were not in the home and being attended to at preschool 3 and a half days a week. The callback after the first murder is speculation but she 100% did call Patrick back after he called her. Showing she was definitely not in some psychosis Lindsay Clancy was very privileged. Her husband is estimated to make between $258,000-$482,000 per year based on his job and Glassdoor salaries
5:04

You’ve been lied to about Lindsay Clancy, she wasn’t some struggling mom, she was very privileged “The 8 month old baby was born. The 3 and 5 year old were in daycare full-time. Patrick took a 12 week paternity leave, and they hired a nanny to help with the newborn baby. After the 12 week leave was over, Patrick could see that Lindsay needed more help and support, so he decided to move his office into home and started working from home. So they decided they didn't need the nanny anymore because Patrick was gonna stay home, and you guys are saying that this woman had no support? That is false. A key factor that you guys are missing of this whole entire thing, and you're letting this woman play on your emotions, she was a labor and delivery nurse herself. She was in this career path. Lindsay knew, she knew, if I tell my doctors that I am hearing voices and having thoughts of harming my children, they're going to be taken away from me. She knew that. She is smart, she's calculated, and this was premeditated. Any woman going through actual psychosis, especially with the career path she was in, being very educated on this, she would have gone to her doctors and said, "I need them away from me because I think I'm gonna kill them." She didn't do that. Why? Because she wanted the opportunity to kill her three kids. She Googled how to kill. She Googled how long it would take Patrick to go from the house to the restaurant. She murdered one child. Patrick called. She missed the call. She called back after killing one child and said, "We're good here. Everything's fine. We're fine."’ She also gives an excellent medicine breakdown on how there is no way she was actually in the state of mind she claims to be “You guys are letting a very smart and calculated woman manipulate you and play on your emotions, and it's working, and a jury really might let her walk because… it's scary” And now we have a mistrial…. The only correction here is the children were in preschool not daycare but either way they were not in the home and being attended to at preschool 3 and a half days a week. The callback after the first murder is speculation but she 100% did call Patrick back after he called her. Showing she was definitely not in some psychosis Lindsay Clancy was very privileged. Her husband is estimated to make between $258,000-$482,000 per year based on his job and Glassdoor salaries

Wall Street Apes

1,379,823 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

🚨NEW- PAULA DEVLIN CALLS EVERYONE WHO CRITICIZES HER A HATER AND “THINK IT’S JUST BLACK & WHITE THAT SHE KILLED HER KIDS AND THAT’S THAT.” BRACE YOURSELVES FOR PAULA DEVLIN, AGAIN: “Yeah, we were a very intense group. Like really meticulous. We wanted to do the right thing. Yeah, I—that’s—I don’t think anybody can really understand that. I mean, now I’ve heard all these haters that are out there that think that it’s black and white and she killed her kids and that’s that. And, you know, we’ve even had stuff come at us like we don’t know what we’re talking about. The evidence was so clear. And I just have to take a deep breath because nobody but the 12 of us looked at all, you know, the majority of 297 pieces of evidence. I mean, you know, way more than the reporters who were there every day, including medical records, autopsy photos, and other…” Lindsay Clancy’s children couldn’t be reached for comment. Source: NBC 10 WJAR
1:10

🚨NEW- PAULA DEVLIN CALLS EVERYONE WHO CRITICIZES HER A HATER AND “THINK IT’S JUST BLACK & WHITE THAT SHE KILLED HER KIDS AND THAT’S THAT.” BRACE YOURSELVES FOR PAULA DEVLIN, AGAIN: “Yeah, we were a very intense group. Like really meticulous. We wanted to do the right thing. Yeah, I—that’s—I don’t think anybody can really understand that. I mean, now I’ve heard all these haters that are out there that think that it’s black and white and she killed her kids and that’s that. And, you know, we’ve even had stuff come at us like we don’t know what we’re talking about. The evidence was so clear. And I just have to take a deep breath because nobody but the 12 of us looked at all, you know, the majority of 297 pieces of evidence. I mean, you know, way more than the reporters who were there every day, including medical records, autopsy photos, and other…” Lindsay Clancy’s children couldn’t be reached for comment. Source: NBC 10 WJAR

Lindsay 🇺🇸

27,640 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce