Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Pay attention 💥💥💥 “Over the weekend, John Solomon reported on DNI Gabbard investigating communications showing Ukraine plotted with USAID to funnel $200 million into “Biden’s” 2024 campaign. Now, we are getting reports that USAID money was funneled to an organization that created fake Ukraine and Russiagate evidence against Donald...

16,962 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Here it is: MORE CONFIRMATION: It turns out even the CIA and its arm USAID can start a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO). The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project OCCRP) operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit investigative newsroom and media development platform. OCCRP is a global network of independent media centers and journalists, often formally operated by the Journalism Development Network. —The tactics that was used by the Central Intelligence Agency and its arm—USAID to topple governments abroad was brought back home to overthrow the United States government. USAID funneled taxpayer fund to an NGO, OCCRP that created the fake Ukraine and Russiagate evidence against the sitting president of the United States Donald Trump Michael Shellenberger “USAID effectively created this organization called the Organized Crime and Corruption Research Project Reporting Project — We also know that it did the foundational research that was essential to bringing the impeachment case against Trump in December of 2019. It was what the CIA whistleblower relied upon in his initial complaint in lDecember of 2019 So those are the facts — So this is basically a situation where the CIA person, Eric Ciaramella in the White House who've been left over by Obama writes a a complaint describing alleged violation of the law. This was then picked up in the house, impeached Trump, the Senate of course declined to hear it. But I think what's so interesting here is that this is an organization that's behind it that's funded by USAID that would not exist without USAID in what I think you have to consider to be domestic politics, which is absolutely forbidden. — So this looks like regime change tactics that the CIA and USAID had done abroad being brought back home against Donald Trump.” 📝 In other words: If you’re an investigative journalist on CNN reporting—you don’t need to ‘sell me on it please’. Once you’re out of CNN, ‘sell me on it.’

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

33,644 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

“OCCRP’s Work is Not Political,” said the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project last week, apparently in response to our story about its involvement in the 2019 impeachment of President Donald Trump. “OCCRP has recently become the target of a conspiracy theory suggesting that we worked with one of our donors, USAID, to undermine President Donald Trump during his first administration. This is simply untrue, and it’s not how OCCRP operates.” But the allegations in our report, that USAID effectively created and oversees OCCRP, are true. Senior managers at USAID and the co-founder of OCCRP confirmed that USAID must sign off on the hiring of key OCCRP personnel and its annual work plan. OCCRP created a central piece of evidence in a CIA analyst’s whistleblower complaint that resulted in the House of Representatives voting to impeach President Donald Trump in December 2019. OCCRP admits all of this in its response: “Here are the facts: One of our storieswas cited in a 2019 whistleblower complaint filed against President Donald Trump. The complaint then sparked his first impeachment.” OCCRP defended itself against accusations that it was part of a conspiracy. “That story, like all stories we do, was reported without our donors’ knowledge or input. OCCRP had no contact with the whistleblower, and was unaware of the complaint until after it was reported by U.S. domestic media.” In an email to Public, OCCRP’s Editor in Chief noted that OCCRP published an article about how Hunter Biden’s business partner, Devon Archer, “had received millions from a reputed organized crime associate” as evidence that OCCRP has no political bias. But neither we nor any other media outlet claimed that OCCRP had the direct input of USAID for its story, nor that it had any contact with the whistleblower. It’s not clear that such communication would even be needed for USAID and OCCRP to participate in a scheme to develop evidence against Trump for a supposedly impeachable offense. As for OCCRP’s article about Hunter Biden’s business partner, it repeatedly stressed that Hunter Biden was not involved. “While the younger Biden had previously been involved with RSTP [Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners],” OCCRP wrote, “there is no evidence that he played a role in the mbloom [startup fund] deal.” OCCRP went on to say that it had confirmed Biden’s lack of involvement after reviewing “financial records.” It did not specify how it obtained those records. And despite the extensive evidence of influence peddling by the Bidens in countries routinely covered by OCCRP, including Ukraine, the organization does not appear to have thoroughly investigated them. OCCRP describes itself as a cost-effective arm of the US government’s anti-corruption efforts, writing that “our stories have helped return more than $11 billion to public coffers through seizures and fines” and that “OCCRP has brought in at least ten times more money to the U.S. government than it has received in grants.” But if it’s an arm of the US government, it’s one that was weaponized against Trump. A new investigation by Public shows that OCCRP played a significant role in developing the narrative that Trump and his associates had ties to Russian banking and Russian money laundering, as well as other undisclosed conflicts of interest with Russia. Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, watch the rest of the video, and read the rest of the article!

Michael Shellenberger

125,468 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr