Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Peak human stupidity just plopped itself right into the river. 🤦 These bulk size human potatoes are sitting their fat asses down in the water, breaking off pieces of pork chops and hand-feeding a wild alligator like it's their death pet. They're not even standing up — they're sitting...

StraightFlorida's profile picture

Straight Florida

17,487 subscribers

1,120,897 просмотров • 11 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаЗдоровье и велнесЖивотные
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

It's not important that your partner is an identical copy of you. It's important that they're not, that they bring something else to the table that you don't have. Now, in the context of entrepreneurship, because that's what I'm associated with, you need to find somebody that's willing to put up with the fact that you're just never there. I mean, that's very difficult because if you're running a business and you can't have a balanced life when you're an entrepreneur. It's really about finding that person that understands what you're about, that you're going down that journey and that you're not gonna stop doing it.
2:20

It's not important that your partner is an identical copy of you. It's important that they're not, that they bring something else to the table that you don't have. Now, in the context of entrepreneurship, because that's what I'm associated with, you need to find somebody that's willing to put up with the fact that you're just never there. I mean, that's very difficult because if you're running a business and you can't have a balanced life when you're an entrepreneur. It's really about finding that person that understands what you're about, that you're going down that journey and that you're not gonna stop doing it.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

17,254 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I just had one of the most traumatising experiences of my life… Went into Tesco for some pork chops, and what do I find? HALAL sausages sitting in the pork section. I was shaken to my core. This is not just wrong, it’s inhumane. 😳🐖 And as if that wasn’t enough, guess what turned up at my house? A Digital ID straight from the Home Office. 👀 Check out the video to see it all (Digital ID reveal at the end).
0:39

Sensitive content

I just had one of the most traumatising experiences of my life… Went into Tesco for some pork chops, and what do I find? HALAL sausages sitting in the pork section. I was shaken to my core. This is not just wrong, it’s inhumane. 😳🐖 And as if that wasn’t enough, guess what turned up at my house? A Digital ID straight from the Home Office. 👀 Check out the video to see it all (Digital ID reveal at the end).

Sir Shoaib

395,748 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

I found two different starches in a Tesco pork joint. Not one — two. Here's what they do, why they're there, and what it means for the price you're actually paying. Tesco Basted Pork Loin Joint (800g) ingredients: Pork Loin (90%), Water, Sea Salt, Modified Maize Starch, Sugar, Tapioca Starch, Rosemary Extract. I'm a primary producer. I don't supply supermarkets. That means I have no agenda except showing you what's actually in the food reaching your plate — and what the label is telling you, if you know how to read it. In this video I break down what Modified Maize Starch and Tapioca Starch are doing in a whole pork joint, why two starches are used together, and how this connects to the same approach I exposed in a Tesco beef roasting joint weeks ago. The information is on the label. It always has been. But it's written in language designed not to slow you down in the aisle. Want real meat? Shop now : Memberships:
5:06

I found two different starches in a Tesco pork joint. Not one — two. Here's what they do, why they're there, and what it means for the price you're actually paying. Tesco Basted Pork Loin Joint (800g) ingredients: Pork Loin (90%), Water, Sea Salt, Modified Maize Starch, Sugar, Tapioca Starch, Rosemary Extract. I'm a primary producer. I don't supply supermarkets. That means I have no agenda except showing you what's actually in the food reaching your plate — and what the label is telling you, if you know how to read it. In this video I break down what Modified Maize Starch and Tapioca Starch are doing in a whole pork joint, why two starches are used together, and how this connects to the same approach I exposed in a Tesco beef roasting joint weeks ago. The information is on the label. It always has been. But it's written in language designed not to slow you down in the aisle. Want real meat? Shop now : Memberships:

Ben Aveling- Radmore Farm

38,847 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Roseanne: The Epidemic in America is child sex abuse. Jeffrey Epstein and his cult friends are full-on vampires that eat human flesh and drink human blood. "You know they eat babies? That is not bullshit… It's true. So it's not just the dogs and the cats not just the pets. It's not just the dogs and the cats. They're full on vampires. And everybody still thinks I'm crazy but I'm not crazy. They're full-on vampires they love the taste of human flesh and they drink human blood...So many kids that I was in mental institutions with over the years, they are all from those cults. And they've covered it all up. I just pray to God that he opens everybody's eyes in this country. By the time we go into vote for Trump, that He will open up everybody's eyes and they will stop pretending to be asleep. Please wake up even those who are pretending to be asleep with the irrefutable truth of what the worst people on this planet are really up to... There are so many victims... The epidemic in America is child sexual abuse and I just want people to see it I want people to open up their eyes and see how prevalent and horrible it is. It's just horrible And you just can't la la lie it away anymore. It's gonna get more and more apparent and you gotta choose your side."
2:11

Roseanne: The Epidemic in America is child sex abuse. Jeffrey Epstein and his cult friends are full-on vampires that eat human flesh and drink human blood. "You know they eat babies? That is not bullshit… It's true. So it's not just the dogs and the cats not just the pets. It's not just the dogs and the cats. They're full on vampires. And everybody still thinks I'm crazy but I'm not crazy. They're full-on vampires they love the taste of human flesh and they drink human blood...So many kids that I was in mental institutions with over the years, they are all from those cults. And they've covered it all up. I just pray to God that he opens everybody's eyes in this country. By the time we go into vote for Trump, that He will open up everybody's eyes and they will stop pretending to be asleep. Please wake up even those who are pretending to be asleep with the irrefutable truth of what the worst people on this planet are really up to... There are so many victims... The epidemic in America is child sexual abuse and I just want people to see it I want people to open up their eyes and see how prevalent and horrible it is. It's just horrible And you just can't la la lie it away anymore. It's gonna get more and more apparent and you gotta choose your side."

Thrilla the Gorilla

44,219 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨JOE ROGAN: "The (Deep State) cant conspire right now because their phones are tapped. The power that the Government has to look into people's emails, their phones, their texts, their signal, their everything -- the idea that they're not doing that if they're not in the middle of a trillion dollar fraud investigation is ridiculous. They also have to worry about people taking deals. There'll be some people that squeal. So you don't know who's your enemy and who's your friend and you go to lunch with someone and they're wearing some button camera and now you're f**ked. So they're not united right now. This is why it's working and they're able to release all these information and people are in this hot panic right now."
1:13

🚨JOE ROGAN: "The (Deep State) cant conspire right now because their phones are tapped. The power that the Government has to look into people's emails, their phones, their texts, their signal, their everything -- the idea that they're not doing that if they're not in the middle of a trillion dollar fraud investigation is ridiculous. They also have to worry about people taking deals. There'll be some people that squeal. So you don't know who's your enemy and who's your friend and you go to lunch with someone and they're wearing some button camera and now you're f**ked. So they're not united right now. This is why it's working and they're able to release all these information and people are in this hot panic right now."

Autism Capital 🧩

1,718,760 просмотров • 1 год назад

American “So I work across the hall from the Department of Human Services in a small town in Texas — Food stamps, free health care” She says the place has been a revolving door with lines out the door with foreigners and single able bodied men for years signing up for benefits “I saw it firsthand that those services are being abused and it's not by Americans, it's by illegals and it's by males — I have a huge problem with an able-bodied male from another country coming over here and basically just mooching off the system. Because that's what they're doing. They're not contributing to society. They're not doing anything”
2:18

American “So I work across the hall from the Department of Human Services in a small town in Texas — Food stamps, free health care” She says the place has been a revolving door with lines out the door with foreigners and single able bodied men for years signing up for benefits “I saw it firsthand that those services are being abused and it's not by Americans, it's by illegals and it's by males — I have a huge problem with an able-bodied male from another country coming over here and basically just mooching off the system. Because that's what they're doing. They're not contributing to society. They're not doing anything”

Wall Street Apes

1,065,943 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

“I'm not a huge hater of the institutions. I wasn't a huge hater of altcoins. These institutional products are just kind of altcoins. People can go make their money. Go do your thing. But it's not Bitcoin. An ETF is not Bitcoin. With these centralized projects, you're not getting the core values of Bitcoin, the control, the censorship resistance, the privacy. You're putting it in a centralized wrapper, and if you put Bitcoin in a centralized wrapper, you lose everything that's good about it. It's not Bitcoin. It's just an affinity marketing thing. It's “Hey, you like Bitcoin, go buy my other project." Just like, "Hey you like bitcoin? Go buy my altcoin." It's not the same thing, and I think in many ways it's a step backwards. I don't hate these people, but they certainly shouldn't be celebrated. It's not forwarding our industry if we do treasury strategies, if we do ETFs, we cheer for BlackRock and Cantor. That's a step backwards. It's not something to be cheerful for. It's not a victory, in my opinion. A victory is having more people have direct ownership of real Bitcoin. We now have millions of people who've been onboarded into this fake paper thing that's a claim on a claim on a claim of something that has Bitcoin in the words, but it's not actually Bitcoin. They are never actually holding a wallet like many of us did back in 2012 where somebody sent us that first dollar and you say, "Wow, this is cool. I didn't need to give my ID and I'm able to control and hold this sound money for the first time." You now have a whole generation of millions of people that don't have that. They have some junk fiat product sitting like sludge on their centralized brokerage account at the centralized clearing firm, traded on a centralized exchange, with a centralized transfer agent, and a centralized custodian, and they have to trust six levels of people on a claim for something that has the word ‘Bitcoin’ in it. It's not a victory. It's not a step forward. I don't think it's something that should be celebrated at all.”
2:00

“I'm not a huge hater of the institutions. I wasn't a huge hater of altcoins. These institutional products are just kind of altcoins. People can go make their money. Go do your thing. But it's not Bitcoin. An ETF is not Bitcoin. With these centralized projects, you're not getting the core values of Bitcoin, the control, the censorship resistance, the privacy. You're putting it in a centralized wrapper, and if you put Bitcoin in a centralized wrapper, you lose everything that's good about it. It's not Bitcoin. It's just an affinity marketing thing. It's “Hey, you like Bitcoin, go buy my other project." Just like, "Hey you like bitcoin? Go buy my altcoin." It's not the same thing, and I think in many ways it's a step backwards. I don't hate these people, but they certainly shouldn't be celebrated. It's not forwarding our industry if we do treasury strategies, if we do ETFs, we cheer for BlackRock and Cantor. That's a step backwards. It's not something to be cheerful for. It's not a victory, in my opinion. A victory is having more people have direct ownership of real Bitcoin. We now have millions of people who've been onboarded into this fake paper thing that's a claim on a claim on a claim of something that has Bitcoin in the words, but it's not actually Bitcoin. They are never actually holding a wallet like many of us did back in 2012 where somebody sent us that first dollar and you say, "Wow, this is cool. I didn't need to give my ID and I'm able to control and hold this sound money for the first time." You now have a whole generation of millions of people that don't have that. They have some junk fiat product sitting like sludge on their centralized brokerage account at the centralized clearing firm, traded on a centralized exchange, with a centralized transfer agent, and a centralized custodian, and they have to trust six levels of people on a claim for something that has the word ‘Bitcoin’ in it. It's not a victory. It's not a step forward. I don't think it's something that should be celebrated at all.”

Bruce Fenton

23,862 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

First Hand Account of Hurricane Helene Victim Confirming $750 FEMA Aid Offered To Him IS A LOAN American has been crying for 20 minutes after FEMA visited him, “sorry for the emotions” “There is a FEMA man who came and explained something very serious about the $750 that you guys don't know and that they're not going to tell you. And unless you have a magnifying glass in the contract that they're going to sign during your inspection, you'll never see it. So you're going to hear it from me and hopefully from everybody else who is going to share this shit around. The $750 is a loan. It's not free. They're not giving it to you. It's a loan And if you don't pay back that seven hundred and fifty dollar loan within a year, they're gonna seize your property” “Don't take it. Do not take it. One thing that you're going to notice folks is they're not giving that money to people who have a little bit of money. They're not giving it to people who have jobs. They're giving it to the welfare of people who have nothing, who have absolutely nothing. And they're going to take advantage of these people first.” “It just, just blows my mind”
1:54

First Hand Account of Hurricane Helene Victim Confirming $750 FEMA Aid Offered To Him IS A LOAN American has been crying for 20 minutes after FEMA visited him, “sorry for the emotions” “There is a FEMA man who came and explained something very serious about the $750 that you guys don't know and that they're not going to tell you. And unless you have a magnifying glass in the contract that they're going to sign during your inspection, you'll never see it. So you're going to hear it from me and hopefully from everybody else who is going to share this shit around. The $750 is a loan. It's not free. They're not giving it to you. It's a loan And if you don't pay back that seven hundred and fifty dollar loan within a year, they're gonna seize your property” “Don't take it. Do not take it. One thing that you're going to notice folks is they're not giving that money to people who have a little bit of money. They're not giving it to people who have jobs. They're giving it to the welfare of people who have nothing, who have absolutely nothing. And they're going to take advantage of these people first.” “It just, just blows my mind”

Wall Street Apes

1,860,032 просмотров • 1 год назад

What absolute nonsense. Don't most people want to work hard to do better by their own families? To have a better house, better holidays, better furniture? Isn't that a worthwhile thing? Wouldn't life be very much better if more people took responsibility for their families and for building their own future? And when they do that, and have a little bit left over to help people less fortunate than themselves—isn't that a good thing? And aren't we trying to get the Third World out of the poverty it's in by building up its industries and having some investment to go and help them with? John Wesley answered the question you just put: 'Do not impute to money the faults of human nature.' It's not the money, it's not the wealth you create; it's what you do with it. Many people use their money to do more for the arts, to see more, to enjoy more of the great artistic works. Look at the fantastic voluntary effort in this country. It's enormous. Greed? Isn't it absurd! Trade unions mostly argue for higher wages. They argue for bigger differentials. Some people are greedy. But people who want a better standard of living and better way of life for their children are not. They're highly moral. They're highly valued citizens and they're usually those people who look after their houses, their families and they look after their neighbourhoods—community spirit. This is the real 'Thatcherism'.
2:31

What absolute nonsense. Don't most people want to work hard to do better by their own families? To have a better house, better holidays, better furniture? Isn't that a worthwhile thing? Wouldn't life be very much better if more people took responsibility for their families and for building their own future? And when they do that, and have a little bit left over to help people less fortunate than themselves—isn't that a good thing? And aren't we trying to get the Third World out of the poverty it's in by building up its industries and having some investment to go and help them with? John Wesley answered the question you just put: 'Do not impute to money the faults of human nature.' It's not the money, it's not the wealth you create; it's what you do with it. Many people use their money to do more for the arts, to see more, to enjoy more of the great artistic works. Look at the fantastic voluntary effort in this country. It's enormous. Greed? Isn't it absurd! Trade unions mostly argue for higher wages. They argue for bigger differentials. Some people are greedy. But people who want a better standard of living and better way of life for their children are not. They're highly moral. They're highly valued citizens and they're usually those people who look after their houses, their families and they look after their neighbourhoods—community spirit. This is the real 'Thatcherism'.

Margaret Thatcher

147,247 просмотров • 1 год назад

Vending machines are child's play compared to this. I just found the most overlooked money-making machine sitting right in plain sight at every gas station in America. You buy one of these things once and it pays you for years. How do I know this works? Because it's working in Romania. It runs itself 24-7 and every time someone uses it, you make two bucks while spending about three cents in electricity in case you're not counting. That's a 98 plus percent profit margin. 10 people use this a day. You're making seven grand a year from one machine. What if you had 20 machines? You're not staffing it. You're not running it. You're plugging it in and collecting the money. This works because people would rather pay two bucks to avoid something dirty touching their feet for 30 seconds It's impulse. You don't want to spend $23 to go to the car wash only to use this afterwards. While they're at the gas station, they're cleaning out the trash in their car, they're scrubbing down their windshield, they're already in the cleaning mindset. This is a no-brainer upsell and you can split the revenue with the gas station owner. And guess what? Most gas station owners own more than one gas station. So one point of contact equals multiple locations. And it's not just gas stations. Car washes, shopping center, parking lots, strip malls, anywhere cars are already stopping. Full business plan in the link in the comments
1:03

Vending machines are child's play compared to this. I just found the most overlooked money-making machine sitting right in plain sight at every gas station in America. You buy one of these things once and it pays you for years. How do I know this works? Because it's working in Romania. It runs itself 24-7 and every time someone uses it, you make two bucks while spending about three cents in electricity in case you're not counting. That's a 98 plus percent profit margin. 10 people use this a day. You're making seven grand a year from one machine. What if you had 20 machines? You're not staffing it. You're not running it. You're plugging it in and collecting the money. This works because people would rather pay two bucks to avoid something dirty touching their feet for 30 seconds It's impulse. You don't want to spend $23 to go to the car wash only to use this afterwards. While they're at the gas station, they're cleaning out the trash in their car, they're scrubbing down their windshield, they're already in the cleaning mindset. This is a no-brainer upsell and you can split the revenue with the gas station owner. And guess what? Most gas station owners own more than one gas station. So one point of contact equals multiple locations. And it's not just gas stations. Car washes, shopping center, parking lots, strip malls, anywhere cars are already stopping. Full business plan in the link in the comments

Chris Koerner

184,473 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

.Cerebras CEO Andrew Feldman explains the benefits of water cooling over air cooling for datacenters: "In Buffalo at a Bills game, there are always three idiots with their shirts off. It's 10 below, and they've got their shirt off. They've been drinking hard, but they're not dead. Why aren't they dead? If you're in the water, and the water's 45 degrees, and you're there for eight minutes, you're dead. Why? It's because water is really good at sucking heat off of heat sources." "The thermal density of water is really high. It rips heat off you. The air doesn't do that. So they can stand there with their shirt off and not be dead." "It's the exact same thing when you're cooling a chip. Water has an ability to pull heat off a heat source that is vastly better than air." "It is more efficient by an order of magnitude to use liquid, water in particular is great and low cost, to pull heat off the back of chips." "Gamers have been doing it forever because they want to run those GPUs hot."
2:44

.Cerebras CEO Andrew Feldman explains the benefits of water cooling over air cooling for datacenters: "In Buffalo at a Bills game, there are always three idiots with their shirts off. It's 10 below, and they've got their shirt off. They've been drinking hard, but they're not dead. Why aren't they dead? If you're in the water, and the water's 45 degrees, and you're there for eight minutes, you're dead. Why? It's because water is really good at sucking heat off of heat sources." "The thermal density of water is really high. It rips heat off you. The air doesn't do that. So they can stand there with their shirt off and not be dead." "It's the exact same thing when you're cooling a chip. Water has an ability to pull heat off a heat source that is vastly better than air." "It is more efficient by an order of magnitude to use liquid, water in particular is great and low cost, to pull heat off the back of chips." "Gamers have been doing it forever because they want to run those GPUs hot."

TBPN

26,099 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

You'd be amazed how many wealthy people that say they're rich do not have liquidity. Liquidity is defined by the ability at any moment to have liquid cash. You're not rich if it's all tied up in real estate. You're not rich if it's in jewelry and in cars and in boats and all that stuff. Sure. It's very hard to get 5 million liquid because in this market, that makes you $250,000 a year pre-tax. You have a family of four and poo-poo hits the fan in your world and everybody loses their job, you can sustain a family of $250k pre-tax. That's why it's the magic number.
1:11

You'd be amazed how many wealthy people that say they're rich do not have liquidity. Liquidity is defined by the ability at any moment to have liquid cash. You're not rich if it's all tied up in real estate. You're not rich if it's in jewelry and in cars and in boats and all that stuff. Sure. It's very hard to get 5 million liquid because in this market, that makes you $250,000 a year pre-tax. You have a family of four and poo-poo hits the fan in your world and everybody loses their job, you can sustain a family of $250k pre-tax. That's why it's the magic number.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

167,349 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Viktor Hovland made 8 birdies to close with a 5 under par 67 at the Masters. After the round, he went deep on the ball flight laws and the importance of matching up the club face to the swing path: “It's a good question. It's just tough to answer. First of all, that's why I like TrackMan and understanding the ball flight laws are very good to have because you can start a ball left, more left than you would like, but if it's curving back, who cares. That just means you're -- granted, if you're hitting it in the center your club path is just maybe creeping a bit more left, but if your face is in the right spot you're just hitting a bigger curve and then you can adjust that accordingly. “If you're starting the ball left and it's going left, is it a face issue, are you striking it off the heel and they're not coming back? There's a lot of minutiae involved with that. “If it's just a face-to-path issue or a club path direction, you can solve that pretty easily by playing a bigger cut or playing a bigger draw or moving it a bit more forward or back in the stance, simple stuff like that.” This is a great explanation that a lot of amateurs can learn from. The Masters
1:01

Viktor Hovland made 8 birdies to close with a 5 under par 67 at the Masters. After the round, he went deep on the ball flight laws and the importance of matching up the club face to the swing path: “It's a good question. It's just tough to answer. First of all, that's why I like TrackMan and understanding the ball flight laws are very good to have because you can start a ball left, more left than you would like, but if it's curving back, who cares. That just means you're -- granted, if you're hitting it in the center your club path is just maybe creeping a bit more left, but if your face is in the right spot you're just hitting a bigger curve and then you can adjust that accordingly. “If you're starting the ball left and it's going left, is it a face issue, are you striking it off the heel and they're not coming back? There's a lot of minutiae involved with that. “If it's just a face-to-path issue or a club path direction, you can solve that pretty easily by playing a bigger cut or playing a bigger draw or moving it a bit more forward or back in the stance, simple stuff like that.” This is a great explanation that a lot of amateurs can learn from. The Masters

Flushing It

667,423 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

TIM DILLON on "everything in America being some type of psyop" 🇺🇸😵‍💫 "They're not even good" "[But] they're effective because you're aiming for the lowest common denominator" "They're literally coming out and inventing people [like Ed Gallrein], and you have to go along with it" "the way they get you to do that is by shoving it down your throat" "There's no where you can go. You cannot escape... To a point, where, like a horde of zombies, they go into the voting booth and vote for this guy [Gallrein] who's trying to quite literally kill their children" "He wants their children dead" "These are not campaigns... this is a psychological operation aimed at the lowest common denominator lizard-brain instincts that you have" "It's like an electromagnetic pulse weapon that [Miriam] Adelson's got in Kentucky" "[But] they're not even good [now]" "You can look at things the government has done and go, 'Wow. They dotted all their Is and crossed all their Ts" "Now, they have such little respect for you. They have almost no respect for you" "You're being treated like an adolescent who is asking too many questions and is bothering them" "Right now the American public is bothering the government. And the government is dealing with that by making up stories and... having their emissaries go out there and say, 'This is reality'" Tim Dillon
4:00

TIM DILLON on "everything in America being some type of psyop" 🇺🇸😵‍💫 "They're not even good" "[But] they're effective because you're aiming for the lowest common denominator" "They're literally coming out and inventing people [like Ed Gallrein], and you have to go along with it" "the way they get you to do that is by shoving it down your throat" "There's no where you can go. You cannot escape... To a point, where, like a horde of zombies, they go into the voting booth and vote for this guy [Gallrein] who's trying to quite literally kill their children" "He wants their children dead" "These are not campaigns... this is a psychological operation aimed at the lowest common denominator lizard-brain instincts that you have" "It's like an electromagnetic pulse weapon that [Miriam] Adelson's got in Kentucky" "[But] they're not even good [now]" "You can look at things the government has done and go, 'Wow. They dotted all their Is and crossed all their Ts" "Now, they have such little respect for you. They have almost no respect for you" "You're being treated like an adolescent who is asking too many questions and is bothering them" "Right now the American public is bothering the government. And the government is dealing with that by making up stories and... having their emissaries go out there and say, 'This is reality'" Tim Dillon

Sense Receptor

31,800 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"You mentioned at the top of your show that people think it's about the oil, some people think it's about this, some people that, the true answer is, you're kind of all right, you're just not putting it all together. Because yes, it is about oil, but not in the fact that we want to take the oil. We don't want our adversaries getting their hands on the #1—303 billion in oil reserves. They're #1 in the world, and that's not the Saudis, it's not the Iranians, it's the Venezuelans. And we do not want our adversaries to get a hold of that...and China was their largest purchaser of oil exports. China was. I don't think that's going to continue any longer." -Jason Buttrill, Head Writer and Chief Researcher for The Glenn Beck Program
5:16

"You mentioned at the top of your show that people think it's about the oil, some people think it's about this, some people that, the true answer is, you're kind of all right, you're just not putting it all together. Because yes, it is about oil, but not in the fact that we want to take the oil. We don't want our adversaries getting their hands on the #1—303 billion in oil reserves. They're #1 in the world, and that's not the Saudis, it's not the Iranians, it's the Venezuelans. And we do not want our adversaries to get a hold of that...and China was their largest purchaser of oil exports. China was. I don't think that's going to continue any longer." -Jason Buttrill, Head Writer and Chief Researcher for The Glenn Beck Program

Liz Wheeler

15,551 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Bricker "Carney, who's used to being sitting in a boardroom and having people, as he hand steeples, just nod their heads, you know, graciously, you're, you know, you're doing wonderful things here, sitting across the table from Danielle Smith and Scott Moe, in which they're saying, you know, Guy, you got to do better than this." "John A. MacDonald would find a way to work with that list and find out with a reasonable compromise, Brian Mulroney would be able to." "I'm not so sure that that is the impulse of this particular group of people." "If the results transpire as we're seeing right now, I think we are at a breaking point in this country." Darrell Bricker Harrison Lowman
5:05

Bricker "Carney, who's used to being sitting in a boardroom and having people, as he hand steeples, just nod their heads, you know, graciously, you're, you know, you're doing wonderful things here, sitting across the table from Danielle Smith and Scott Moe, in which they're saying, you know, Guy, you got to do better than this." "John A. MacDonald would find a way to work with that list and find out with a reasonable compromise, Brian Mulroney would be able to." "I'm not so sure that that is the impulse of this particular group of people." "If the results transpire as we're seeing right now, I think we are at a breaking point in this country." Darrell Bricker Harrison Lowman

cbcwatcher

94,323 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. President Trump just went berserk on the ELECTION FRAUD in California to Kristen Welker's face, and she melted down "They're CROOKED just like YOU'RE CROOKED! You're either CROOKED or you're STUPID. You KNOW these elections are rigged." 🔥 "They're dropping fast because it's a RIGGED ELECTION! It's DAYS and they aren't even CLOSE. They're CHEATING on the election!" WELKER: Do you have evidence?! TRUMP: You just have to look! Do YOU think it's appropriate they have an election, five days+ they're nowhere CLOSE! WELKER: They're slow TRUMP: "No THEY'RE CROOKED! Just like you're crooked, the press is crooked and Meet the Press is crooked!" "You play right into their hands with this crap. You know that these elections are rigged. Your network knows that they're rigged. You know that I won an election in a landslide. And I got 94% bad press. You know why I got that? Because you have no credibility." BOOM!!!
1:24

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. President Trump just went berserk on the ELECTION FRAUD in California to Kristen Welker's face, and she melted down "They're CROOKED just like YOU'RE CROOKED! You're either CROOKED or you're STUPID. You KNOW these elections are rigged." 🔥 "They're dropping fast because it's a RIGGED ELECTION! It's DAYS and they aren't even CLOSE. They're CHEATING on the election!" WELKER: Do you have evidence?! TRUMP: You just have to look! Do YOU think it's appropriate they have an election, five days+ they're nowhere CLOSE! WELKER: They're slow TRUMP: "No THEY'RE CROOKED! Just like you're crooked, the press is crooked and Meet the Press is crooked!" "You play right into their hands with this crap. You know that these elections are rigged. Your network knows that they're rigged. You know that I won an election in a landslide. And I got 94% bad press. You know why I got that? Because you have no credibility." BOOM!!!

Eric Daugherty

651,013 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Listen To Every Single Word Of This Tucker Carlson Clip Nothing is ever about our safety. This country and the world only changes when we eliminate The CIA. “It’ll take someone willing to be assassinated” “—Shut the f*ck up. You're not protecting us, actually” “You open the southern border to anyone who wants come. You're not checking IDs. You're not doing any kind of biometrics. You're not even screening for COVID. So clearly, you don't care about my safety. Stop telling me you do. You don't. You're a criminal. Stop this, charade. You don't care about my safety. So using my safety as a pretext for spying me, it's not gonna fly because I'm not that stupid. I may be kind of stupid, I'm not that stupid. No. You're doing this for one simple reason because this is what organizations do. They protect themselves. They exist for their own benefit. All human organizations from the church bake sale committee to the Department of Justice, they all are the same. They're an organism just like any other, and an organism's main goal is to survive and reproduce to get bigger. And you just see this throughout the federal bureaucracy, which just so happens that the largest human organization in history is the federal government of the United States. And so all of this stuff benefits its it accrues to its own power. That's why, like, let's say you believed every quote piece of science or scientific claim about global climate change. You would not reach the same policy conclusions. You'd be like, well, the first thing we need is ban private air travel because obviously that doesn't make any sense. And then the second thing we need to do is, you know, whatever. You'd you'd look at it rationally for a scientific if if you bought the premise, which I don't, but if you did, you would. That no. You go through every climate, quote, climate demand. Not one of them disempowers large organizations, whether it's NGOs or the government of the United States. Not one of them. They all make the government more powerful, and they all make you less powerful. So that's when you know it's not really about the temperature of the Earth's atmosphere. It's about making them more powerful and disempowering you. And it's not about who runs those agencies. The bigger the agency, the more effective it will be in doing what all human organizations do, which is protect themselves and increase their power. It's like that it's fundamental. I guess that's what I'm saying. It's not about, oh, elect Trump. It'll change. No. It'll only change when, like, we're just eliminating the CIA, and we're gonna have, like, a small intel gathering service that feeds the president relevant information so we can make informed foreign policy decisions, but we're not gonna we're not gonna, like, overturn elections in other countries in the name of democracy because that's insane. If we believe in democracy, then we're gonna let people vote for their own leaders because we believe in democracy as a principle. Right? Right. Like, you just get rid of all this shit because it's not helping us. Us. It's only hurting us. And, um, it would take someone, uh, you know, who'd be willing to be assassinated to do anything like that. And so as as you're choosing your leaders, ask yourself, does this person mean it enough to die? And that's the same question you would ask about your own dad. Does he love me enough to die for me? About your own husband, does he love me enough to protect me from a home home invader at risk to himself? Like, the the basic prerequisite for leadership is love of the people you lead and the willingness to die for them. And if you don't have that, you shouldn't be leading, period. It's true in the military, it's true in business, it's true in your home, and it's true in the government. And so no president will fix this unless he's like literally willing to die for it. And short of that, it can't be fixed.”
3:14

Listen To Every Single Word Of This Tucker Carlson Clip Nothing is ever about our safety. This country and the world only changes when we eliminate The CIA. “It’ll take someone willing to be assassinated” “—Shut the f*ck up. You're not protecting us, actually” “You open the southern border to anyone who wants come. You're not checking IDs. You're not doing any kind of biometrics. You're not even screening for COVID. So clearly, you don't care about my safety. Stop telling me you do. You don't. You're a criminal. Stop this, charade. You don't care about my safety. So using my safety as a pretext for spying me, it's not gonna fly because I'm not that stupid. I may be kind of stupid, I'm not that stupid. No. You're doing this for one simple reason because this is what organizations do. They protect themselves. They exist for their own benefit. All human organizations from the church bake sale committee to the Department of Justice, they all are the same. They're an organism just like any other, and an organism's main goal is to survive and reproduce to get bigger. And you just see this throughout the federal bureaucracy, which just so happens that the largest human organization in history is the federal government of the United States. And so all of this stuff benefits its it accrues to its own power. That's why, like, let's say you believed every quote piece of science or scientific claim about global climate change. You would not reach the same policy conclusions. You'd be like, well, the first thing we need is ban private air travel because obviously that doesn't make any sense. And then the second thing we need to do is, you know, whatever. You'd you'd look at it rationally for a scientific if if you bought the premise, which I don't, but if you did, you would. That no. You go through every climate, quote, climate demand. Not one of them disempowers large organizations, whether it's NGOs or the government of the United States. Not one of them. They all make the government more powerful, and they all make you less powerful. So that's when you know it's not really about the temperature of the Earth's atmosphere. It's about making them more powerful and disempowering you. And it's not about who runs those agencies. The bigger the agency, the more effective it will be in doing what all human organizations do, which is protect themselves and increase their power. It's like that it's fundamental. I guess that's what I'm saying. It's not about, oh, elect Trump. It'll change. No. It'll only change when, like, we're just eliminating the CIA, and we're gonna have, like, a small intel gathering service that feeds the president relevant information so we can make informed foreign policy decisions, but we're not gonna we're not gonna, like, overturn elections in other countries in the name of democracy because that's insane. If we believe in democracy, then we're gonna let people vote for their own leaders because we believe in democracy as a principle. Right? Right. Like, you just get rid of all this shit because it's not helping us. Us. It's only hurting us. And, um, it would take someone, uh, you know, who'd be willing to be assassinated to do anything like that. And so as as you're choosing your leaders, ask yourself, does this person mean it enough to die? And that's the same question you would ask about your own dad. Does he love me enough to die for me? About your own husband, does he love me enough to protect me from a home home invader at risk to himself? Like, the the basic prerequisite for leadership is love of the people you lead and the willingness to die for them. And if you don't have that, you shouldn't be leading, period. It's true in the military, it's true in business, it's true in your home, and it's true in the government. And so no president will fix this unless he's like literally willing to die for it. And short of that, it can't be fixed.”

Wall Street Apes

1,879,815 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Elon Musk: We have to have free speech in order for civilization to advance. “It's a bigger deal than you'd think. It's the kind of thing that you don't know what you're missing until you don't have it. In a lot of places, people don't have it. It's important to bear in mind that the nature of free speech is, the acid test for it is, are people you don't like allowed to say things that you don't like? Otherwise it's not free. It can't be just be things that you like because eventually somebody's not going to like what you say and they're going to shut you up. That's the essence of free speech. That's why it's the First Amendment in this country. And if we lose that, I think we lose the bedrock of democracy.” From: NBC Universal Marketing Conference, April 18, 2023
1:05

Elon Musk: We have to have free speech in order for civilization to advance. “It's a bigger deal than you'd think. It's the kind of thing that you don't know what you're missing until you don't have it. In a lot of places, people don't have it. It's important to bear in mind that the nature of free speech is, the acid test for it is, are people you don't like allowed to say things that you don't like? Otherwise it's not free. It can't be just be things that you like because eventually somebody's not going to like what you say and they're going to shut you up. That's the essence of free speech. That's why it's the First Amendment in this country. And if we lose that, I think we lose the bedrock of democracy.” From: NBC Universal Marketing Conference, April 18, 2023

ELON CLIPS

33,631 просмотров • 1 год назад