Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON'S NIGHTMARE: CHINA DEPLOYS DF-27 SHIP-SLAYER ACROSS PACIFIC China’s DF-27 mobile hypersonic missile system is now openly rolling on public roads — and Western intel is scrambling. This missile is built to sink carriers and hammer distant naval bases from thousands of kilometers away, turning the US fleet... posture into a liability. 🔸 DF-27 spotted in convoy on Hebei roads, April 2026 — three launchers under tarps, same chassis as DF-26 but with extended nose section over the cab 🔸 5,000–8,000 km range with hypersonic glide vehicle hitting Mach 5+ on maneuvering trajectory — tested 2,100 km in 12 minutes 🔸 Designed to shred carrier strike groups and bases across the First, Second, and Third Island Chains — Pacific and Indian Ocean ops now under direct threat 🔸 Built from DF-17/DF-26 lessons, solid-fuel, road-mobile, near-impossible to track once launched. Do you think the U.S. can stop China’s hypersonic DF-27?show more

NewRulesGeopolitics

94,117 subscribers

16,947 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨🇷🇺 WEST IN PANIC: RUSSIA DEPLOYS MACH 27 MANEUVERING HYPERSONIC NATO CAN'T STOP Russia's Avangard just made the NATO's trillion-dollar missile shields look like expensive theater. The world's only operational hypersonic glide vehicle rides the Sarmat ICBM into the upper atmosphere, separates, then glides at Mach 20-27 while actively maneuvering to dodge interception. 🔸 Avangard reaches up to Mach 27 while dynamically changing both course and altitude, making reliable interception nearly impossible. 🔸 The system evolved from Soviet Project Albatross, designed in the 1980s specifically to defeat Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative. 🔸 Avangard was revived after the US abandoned the 1972 ABM Treaty, teased by Putin in 2004, and entered full service and production in 2018. 🔸 It carries a powerful 800 kiloton to 2 megaton nuclear warhead with a range exceeding 6,000 km. 🔸 Meanwhile, America’s Long Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) only completed its first trials in 2024. Has the hypersonic arms race already been decided in Russia’s favor?

🚨🇷🇺 WEST IN PANIC: RUSSIA DEPLOYS MACH 27 MANEUVERING HYPERSONIC NATO CAN'T STOP Russia's Avangard just made the NATO's trillion-dollar missile shields look like expensive theater. The world's only operational hypersonic glide vehicle rides the Sarmat ICBM into the upper atmosphere, separates, then glides at Mach 20-27 while actively maneuvering to dodge interception. 🔸 Avangard reaches up to Mach 27 while dynamically changing both course and altitude, making reliable interception nearly impossible. 🔸 The system evolved from Soviet Project Albatross, designed in the 1980s specifically to defeat Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative. 🔸 Avangard was revived after the US abandoned the 1972 ABM Treaty, teased by Putin in 2004, and entered full service and production in 2018. 🔸 It carries a powerful 800 kiloton to 2 megaton nuclear warhead with a range exceeding 6,000 km. 🔸 Meanwhile, America’s Long Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) only completed its first trials in 2024. Has the hypersonic arms race already been decided in Russia’s favor?

NewRulesGeopolitics

34,377 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

$🚨🇮🇷🇨🇳If America Can’t Handle Iranian Missiles, It’s Not Ready for China In just the first 16 days of war against Iran, the United States expended nearly 40% of its THAAD interceptors. If America’s most advanced air defenses are struggling against Iran—a regional power with a fraction of China’s capabilities—there is no plausible scenario in which the US is ready for a showdown with Beijing. The Chinese Arsenal The People’s Liberation Army operates the world’s largest missile inventory, backed by a rapid-action doctrine designed to dismantle U.S. bases and infrastructure in the early stages of conflict. Unlike Iran’s Kheibar Shikan and Sejjil missiles, China’s DF-27 anti-ship ballistic missile and DF-17 hypersonic glide vehicle offer advanced mid-air maneuverability and sustained hypersonic speeds. With an estimated range of 8,000 kilometers, the DF-27 places U.S. naval installations at Pearl Harbor and Everett, Washington within striking distance—allowing China to threaten American assets without deploying a single ship. Strategic Implications According to Dr. Andrew Erickson of the US Naval War College, China is the first nation to operationalize an armed ICBM. These capabilities could cripple U.S. operational effectiveness across East Asia and complicate the defense of American interests in Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and the Philippines in the event of armed conflict. Depleted Defenses Even as Patriot and THAAD struggle against less sophisticated Iranian missiles, Western analysts warn that a large-scale Chinese attack could overwhelm U.S. defenses by depleting interceptor inventories entirely. With THAAD replenishment not expected until April 2027, the fragility of current stockpiles is increasingly difficult to ignore. The Central Question If US air defenses are depleted in the Middle East after just over two weeks of fighting Iran, how will they withstand a Chinese arsenal that dwarfs Iran’s—particularly when the DF-27 can already reach American soil?$

🚨🇮🇷🇨🇳If America Can’t Handle Iranian Missiles, It’s Not Ready for China In just the first 16 days of war against Iran, the United States expended nearly 40% of its THAAD interceptors. If America’s most advanced air defenses are struggling against Iran—a regional power with a fraction of China’s capabilities—there is no plausible scenario in which the US is ready for a showdown with Beijing. The Chinese Arsenal The People’s Liberation Army operates the world’s largest missile inventory, backed by a rapid-action doctrine designed to dismantle U.S. bases and infrastructure in the early stages of conflict. Unlike Iran’s Kheibar Shikan and Sejjil missiles, China’s DF-27 anti-ship ballistic missile and DF-17 hypersonic glide vehicle offer advanced mid-air maneuverability and sustained hypersonic speeds. With an estimated range of 8,000 kilometers, the DF-27 places U.S. naval installations at Pearl Harbor and Everett, Washington within striking distance—allowing China to threaten American assets without deploying a single ship. Strategic Implications According to Dr. Andrew Erickson of the US Naval War College, China is the first nation to operationalize an armed ICBM. These capabilities could cripple U.S. operational effectiveness across East Asia and complicate the defense of American interests in Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and the Philippines in the event of armed conflict. Depleted Defenses Even as Patriot and THAAD struggle against less sophisticated Iranian missiles, Western analysts warn that a large-scale Chinese attack could overwhelm U.S. defenses by depleting interceptor inventories entirely. With THAAD replenishment not expected until April 2027, the fragility of current stockpiles is increasingly difficult to ignore. The Central Question If US air defenses are depleted in the Middle East after just over two weeks of fighting Iran, how will they withstand a Chinese arsenal that dwarfs Iran’s—particularly when the DF-27 can already reach American soil?

NewRulesGeopolitics

137,298 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨🇨🇳 U.S. NAVY IN PANIC: CHINA ARMS ITS MAIN DESTROYER CLASS WITH YJ-20 HYPERSONIC MISSILES New PLA footage has shown a Type 052D destroyer launching the YJ-20 hypersonic anti-ship ballistic missile for the first time publicly. Previously demonstrated aboard the larger Type 055, the weapon has now reached the class that forms the backbone of China’s surface fleet. 🔸 The YJ-20 is a boost-glide weapon capable of speeds above Mach 5, with its range estimated at up to 1,500 km. Its manoeuvring bi-conic glide body can strike ships at a steep, near-vertical angle, making interception far more difficult. 🔸 The missile was cold-launched from one of the Type 052D’s 64 universal vertical-launch cells, ejecting above the ship before its motor ignited. 🔸 More than 35 Type 052Ds are already in service, with additional ships under construction. Unlike the smaller Type 055 fleet, these destroyers are produced in large numbers and routinely operate across the South China Sea and Western Pacific. 🔸 The YJ-20 does not need to replace the YJ-18. A mixed load allows Chinese destroyers to combine long-range hypersonic attacks with sea-skimming cruise missiles, forcing carrier defenses to confront different speeds, trajectories and approach angles. 🔸 This is what makes the integration more important than a single launch. Hypersonic anti-ship firepower can now spread beyond China’s largest destroyers to a far more numerous class, creating more launch platforms and attack directions. 🔸 The Pentagon’s leaked Overmatch brief found that American warships such as the Gerald R. Ford were often destroyed in Taiwan war games. Giving China’s primary destroyer class a hypersonic carrier-killer makes those scenarios even harder for the U.S. Navy. The threat is no longer one rare missile aboard a handful of large warships. It is China’s mass-produced destroyer fleet gaining the ability to attack U.S. carrier groups from extreme range. What threatens U.S. carriers more: the YJ-20’s speed or the number of ships that can launch it?

🚨🇨🇳 U.S. NAVY IN PANIC: CHINA ARMS ITS MAIN DESTROYER CLASS WITH YJ-20 HYPERSONIC MISSILES New PLA footage has shown a Type 052D destroyer launching the YJ-20 hypersonic anti-ship ballistic missile for the first time publicly. Previously demonstrated aboard the larger Type 055, the weapon has now reached the class that forms the backbone of China’s surface fleet. 🔸 The YJ-20 is a boost-glide weapon capable of speeds above Mach 5, with its range estimated at up to 1,500 km. Its manoeuvring bi-conic glide body can strike ships at a steep, near-vertical angle, making interception far more difficult. 🔸 The missile was cold-launched from one of the Type 052D’s 64 universal vertical-launch cells, ejecting above the ship before its motor ignited. 🔸 More than 35 Type 052Ds are already in service, with additional ships under construction. Unlike the smaller Type 055 fleet, these destroyers are produced in large numbers and routinely operate across the South China Sea and Western Pacific. 🔸 The YJ-20 does not need to replace the YJ-18. A mixed load allows Chinese destroyers to combine long-range hypersonic attacks with sea-skimming cruise missiles, forcing carrier defenses to confront different speeds, trajectories and approach angles. 🔸 This is what makes the integration more important than a single launch. Hypersonic anti-ship firepower can now spread beyond China’s largest destroyers to a far more numerous class, creating more launch platforms and attack directions. 🔸 The Pentagon’s leaked Overmatch brief found that American warships such as the Gerald R. Ford were often destroyed in Taiwan war games. Giving China’s primary destroyer class a hypersonic carrier-killer makes those scenarios even harder for the U.S. Navy. The threat is no longer one rare missile aboard a handful of large warships. It is China’s mass-produced destroyer fleet gaining the ability to attack U.S. carrier groups from extreme range. What threatens U.S. carriers more: the YJ-20’s speed or the number of ships that can launch it?

NewRulesGeopolitics

15,627 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 U.S. IN PANIC: CHINA MADE ROCKET-POWERED DRONE TO SPOT AMERICAN CARRIERS FROM 60,000 FEET China is building an automated network of drones and sensors at an industrial scale — something the U.S. has never encountered. Chinese WZ-7 Soaring Dragon drone can locate an aircraft carrier from 60,000 feet up and send its coordinates directly to a missile. 🔸 The WZ-7 Soaring Dragon feeds targeting data directly to DF-21D and DF-26 anti-ship missiles. 🔸 The Atlas Swarm-2, a truck-mounted launcher, can fire 48 drones in three-second intervals, creating a 96-drone swarm that communicates in real time. Onboard AI handles terrain recognition and autonomous routing. 🔸 China's Jiu Tian SS-UAV drone mothership has a 25-meter wingspan and carries between 100 and 150 sub-drones. 🔸 The WZ-8 Hypersonic Ghost reconnaissance drone is rocket-powered and reaches Mach 3 at 100,000 feet. 🔸 China's approach to warfare focuses on intelligentized warfare — algorithm-driven combat, autonomous networks, and industrial scale. The goal is to make decisions at machine speed using networked sensors and algorithm-assisted targeting. This drone ecosystem would severely complicate the traditional U.S. carrier strategy, which relies on launching aircraft to establish air superiority in the area. Do you think that U.S. Carriers can survive coordinated Chinese attack?

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 U.S. IN PANIC: CHINA MADE ROCKET-POWERED DRONE TO SPOT AMERICAN CARRIERS FROM 60,000 FEET China is building an automated network of drones and sensors at an industrial scale — something the U.S. has never encountered. Chinese WZ-7 Soaring Dragon drone can locate an aircraft carrier from 60,000 feet up and send its coordinates directly to a missile. 🔸 The WZ-7 Soaring Dragon feeds targeting data directly to DF-21D and DF-26 anti-ship missiles. 🔸 The Atlas Swarm-2, a truck-mounted launcher, can fire 48 drones in three-second intervals, creating a 96-drone swarm that communicates in real time. Onboard AI handles terrain recognition and autonomous routing. 🔸 China's Jiu Tian SS-UAV drone mothership has a 25-meter wingspan and carries between 100 and 150 sub-drones. 🔸 The WZ-8 Hypersonic Ghost reconnaissance drone is rocket-powered and reaches Mach 3 at 100,000 feet. 🔸 China's approach to warfare focuses on intelligentized warfare — algorithm-driven combat, autonomous networks, and industrial scale. The goal is to make decisions at machine speed using networked sensors and algorithm-assisted targeting. This drone ecosystem would severely complicate the traditional U.S. carrier strategy, which relies on launching aircraft to establish air superiority in the area. Do you think that U.S. Carriers can survive coordinated Chinese attack?

NewRulesGeopolitics

14,925 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 China's Decisive Home-Field Advantage Over the U.S. The Iran War demonstrated American military capability — but also revealed a critical vulnerability. Modern wars, even against weaker adversaries, burn through missiles at an extraordinary rate. But Iran and China are not remotely comparable. China has spent decades preparing specifically for a war against American naval power. Beijing would not rely on speedboats or mines. It would attempt a coordinated campaign designed to keep U.S. carrier strike groups far from the fight — and make intervention around Taiwan or the South China Sea costly from the opening hours of the war. 🔸 China's DF-21D "carrier killer" ballistic missile has an estimated range of 1,500 kilometers. 🔸 The longer-range DF-26 can reach much farther and threatens Guam — a critical U.S. logistics and air hub. 🔸 China would also fight with submarines, long-range bombers, drones, satellites, electronic warfare, and cyberattacks — feats Iran could not sustain. 🔸 Chinese aircraft, missile forces, and naval units would operate near home territory with shorter supply lines and land-based support. 🔸 U.S. forces would need to project power across long distances while protecting bases in Guam, Okinawa, and Japan — all of which could face missile attack in the opening phase of a war. 🔸 Logistics often decide wars. Between fuel, spare parts, runway repairs, and missile reloads, the winning side needs to perfect its ability to support its fighters and hardware at all times. The core issue is endurance. U.S. forces would be heavily dependent on scattered bases throughout the region, requiring fighter jets and bombers to travel long distances. China is built to fight close to home, while the U.S. must sustain power Meanwhile. Missile threats and logistics constraints would slow American response and strain its ability to maintain tempo. Without major adaptation, geography and preparation give Beijing a decisive edge in a prolonged conflict.

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 China's Decisive Home-Field Advantage Over the U.S. The Iran War demonstrated American military capability — but also revealed a critical vulnerability. Modern wars, even against weaker adversaries, burn through missiles at an extraordinary rate. But Iran and China are not remotely comparable. China has spent decades preparing specifically for a war against American naval power. Beijing would not rely on speedboats or mines. It would attempt a coordinated campaign designed to keep U.S. carrier strike groups far from the fight — and make intervention around Taiwan or the South China Sea costly from the opening hours of the war. 🔸 China's DF-21D "carrier killer" ballistic missile has an estimated range of 1,500 kilometers. 🔸 The longer-range DF-26 can reach much farther and threatens Guam — a critical U.S. logistics and air hub. 🔸 China would also fight with submarines, long-range bombers, drones, satellites, electronic warfare, and cyberattacks — feats Iran could not sustain. 🔸 Chinese aircraft, missile forces, and naval units would operate near home territory with shorter supply lines and land-based support. 🔸 U.S. forces would need to project power across long distances while protecting bases in Guam, Okinawa, and Japan — all of which could face missile attack in the opening phase of a war. 🔸 Logistics often decide wars. Between fuel, spare parts, runway repairs, and missile reloads, the winning side needs to perfect its ability to support its fighters and hardware at all times. The core issue is endurance. U.S. forces would be heavily dependent on scattered bases throughout the region, requiring fighter jets and bombers to travel long distances. China is built to fight close to home, while the U.S. must sustain power Meanwhile. Missile threats and logistics constraints would slow American response and strain its ability to maintain tempo. Without major adaptation, geography and preparation give Beijing a decisive edge in a prolonged conflict.

NewRulesGeopolitics

21,899 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON IN PANIC: CHINA’S NEW MISSILE MAKES U.S. AIR POWER BACKBONE OBSOLETE Lightweight Chinese Fighter Jet, J-10C is being armed with the PL-17, the world's longest-range air-to-air beyond visual range missile—turning hundreds of inexpensive fighters into strategic AWACS-killers. Imagery coming from Chinese media verifies the claims. 🔸 The PL-17 is a 6m long, 500kg BVR missile, flies above Mach 4, and can hit targets beyond 400 km. Entered service 2022–2023. It can engage AWACS, tankers, and ISR aircraft from stand-off distances exceeding any Western air-to-air weapon. 🔸 China fields hundreds of J-10Cs. Each can now theoretically target high-value assets (E-2 Hawkeye, KC-135, P-8) from beyond 300–400km—outside retaliatory range. 🔸 It can kill AWACS to blind coalition command and control and dismantle tankers to prevent Japanese and U.S. fighters from reaching the Taiwan Strait. The PL-17 turns a 4.5 gen dogfighter into a strategic decapitation tool. 🔸 A heavy-duty DF-4/3 pylon spotted on the J-10C, previously only seen on J-16s. This adapter is exclusively for PL-17 carriage, confirming the claim. 🔸 From coastal airbases, the J-10C + PL-17 can threaten adversary AWACS operating over the East China Sea, Philippine Sea, and even approach lanes to the Korean Strait—without ever crossing contested lines. Will the PL-17 deliver a devastating blow to the U.S. in a potential Taiwan conflict?

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON IN PANIC: CHINA’S NEW MISSILE MAKES U.S. AIR POWER BACKBONE OBSOLETE Lightweight Chinese Fighter Jet, J-10C is being armed with the PL-17, the world's longest-range air-to-air beyond visual range missile—turning hundreds of inexpensive fighters into strategic AWACS-killers. Imagery coming from Chinese media verifies the claims. 🔸 The PL-17 is a 6m long, 500kg BVR missile, flies above Mach 4, and can hit targets beyond 400 km. Entered service 2022–2023. It can engage AWACS, tankers, and ISR aircraft from stand-off distances exceeding any Western air-to-air weapon. 🔸 China fields hundreds of J-10Cs. Each can now theoretically target high-value assets (E-2 Hawkeye, KC-135, P-8) from beyond 300–400km—outside retaliatory range. 🔸 It can kill AWACS to blind coalition command and control and dismantle tankers to prevent Japanese and U.S. fighters from reaching the Taiwan Strait. The PL-17 turns a 4.5 gen dogfighter into a strategic decapitation tool. 🔸 A heavy-duty DF-4/3 pylon spotted on the J-10C, previously only seen on J-16s. This adapter is exclusively for PL-17 carriage, confirming the claim. 🔸 From coastal airbases, the J-10C + PL-17 can threaten adversary AWACS operating over the East China Sea, Philippine Sea, and even approach lanes to the Korean Strait—without ever crossing contested lines. Will the PL-17 deliver a devastating blow to the U.S. in a potential Taiwan conflict?

NewRulesGeopolitics

23,233 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 US TREMBLES: This Iranian Missile Can Wipe Out Any American Base in the Middle East Iran unveiled the Fattah missile in June 2023 as a new addition to its solid-fuel medium-range ballistic missile arsenal. It has a range of approximately 1,400 km, placing Israel, US bases in the Persian Gulf, and much of the Middle East within reach from Iranian territory. 🔸 Fattah uses solid propellant, allowing it to remain fueled and launch-ready for extended periods. This eliminates the lengthy fueling process required by older liquid-fuel missiles and improves survivability by enabling mobile deployment on transporter-erector-launchers. 🔸 The missile features a maneuverable reentry vehicle mounted on a conical warhead section with small control surfaces. This allows trajectory adjustments during the terminal phase of flight. Unlike traditional ballistic warheads that follow a predictable descent path, maneuvering reentry vehicles can alter direction, reducing interception probability and shortening reaction time for missile defense systems. 🔸 Fattah uses composite materials to reduce structural weight while maintaining strength. This improves range efficiency and allows the missile to carry a warhead estimated at around 450–500 kg. 🔸 The system is part of a broader modernization effort that includes missiles such as Haj Qasem and Kheibar Shekan, all built around solid fuel, mobile launch capability, and maneuverable warheads. These systems are designed for rapid deployment, reduced launch preparation time, and greater operational flexibility. Fattah shows Iran’s continued focus on survivable medium-range strike systems capable of operating from mobile platforms and reaching targets across the region. Trump has been shipping massive amounts of military cargo to the Middle East lately ahead of a possible strike on Iran. Did he manage to send enough body bags for American cannon fodder in case of an Iranian Fatah retaliatory strike?

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 US TREMBLES: This Iranian Missile Can Wipe Out Any American Base in the Middle East Iran unveiled the Fattah missile in June 2023 as a new addition to its solid-fuel medium-range ballistic missile arsenal. It has a range of approximately 1,400 km, placing Israel, US bases in the Persian Gulf, and much of the Middle East within reach from Iranian territory. 🔸 Fattah uses solid propellant, allowing it to remain fueled and launch-ready for extended periods. This eliminates the lengthy fueling process required by older liquid-fuel missiles and improves survivability by enabling mobile deployment on transporter-erector-launchers. 🔸 The missile features a maneuverable reentry vehicle mounted on a conical warhead section with small control surfaces. This allows trajectory adjustments during the terminal phase of flight. Unlike traditional ballistic warheads that follow a predictable descent path, maneuvering reentry vehicles can alter direction, reducing interception probability and shortening reaction time for missile defense systems. 🔸 Fattah uses composite materials to reduce structural weight while maintaining strength. This improves range efficiency and allows the missile to carry a warhead estimated at around 450–500 kg. 🔸 The system is part of a broader modernization effort that includes missiles such as Haj Qasem and Kheibar Shekan, all built around solid fuel, mobile launch capability, and maneuverable warheads. These systems are designed for rapid deployment, reduced launch preparation time, and greater operational flexibility. Fattah shows Iran’s continued focus on survivable medium-range strike systems capable of operating from mobile platforms and reaching targets across the region. Trump has been shipping massive amounts of military cargo to the Middle East lately ahead of a possible strike on Iran. Did he manage to send enough body bags for American cannon fodder in case of an Iranian Fatah retaliatory strike?

NewRulesGeopolitics

16,391 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA’S FIRST ZIRCON-ARMED NUCLEAR SUBMARINE IS ENTERING SERVICE Russia’s Project 885M nuclear submarine Perm is expected to complete trials and join the Navy before the end of 2026. It will be Russia’s first multipurpose nuclear submarine built from the outset to carry Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles as standard armament. 🔸 The Yasen-M combines the concealment and endurance of a nuclear-powered attack submarine with Russia’s most advanced naval strike weapons. Its arsenal includes Zircon, Kalibr and Oniks missiles for attacks against warships and targets deep inland. 🔸 The submarine has a submerged displacement of around 13,800 tonnes, reaches 31 knots underwater, can dive to 520 metres and remain at sea for up to 100 days. 🔸 Zircon reaches speeds of around Mach 9 and can strike sea and land targets at ranges exceeding 1,000 km. Its speed leaves defending forces only minutes to detect the launch, identify the target and attempt an interception. 🔸 The missile has already been successfully launched from beneath the surface, but Perm turns that tested capability into the standard armament of an operational submarine rather than a launch from an adapted trial platform. 🔸 Surface ships carrying hypersonic missiles can be tracked by satellites, aircraft and patrol vessels. A Yasen-M can remain hidden beneath the ocean, change its firing position and attack from an unexpected direction. 🔸 The same submarine can hunt carrier groups and other major warships while holding naval bases, ports, command centres and infrastructure on land at risk. Finding Perm will be NATO’s first problem. Stopping its missiles after launch will be the second — and at Mach 9, the alliance may have only minutes to solve it. Does NATO have an answer to a Mach 9 missile launched from beneath the ocean?

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA’S FIRST ZIRCON-ARMED NUCLEAR SUBMARINE IS ENTERING SERVICE Russia’s Project 885M nuclear submarine Perm is expected to complete trials and join the Navy before the end of 2026. It will be Russia’s first multipurpose nuclear submarine built from the outset to carry Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles as standard armament. 🔸 The Yasen-M combines the concealment and endurance of a nuclear-powered attack submarine with Russia’s most advanced naval strike weapons. Its arsenal includes Zircon, Kalibr and Oniks missiles for attacks against warships and targets deep inland. 🔸 The submarine has a submerged displacement of around 13,800 tonnes, reaches 31 knots underwater, can dive to 520 metres and remain at sea for up to 100 days. 🔸 Zircon reaches speeds of around Mach 9 and can strike sea and land targets at ranges exceeding 1,000 km. Its speed leaves defending forces only minutes to detect the launch, identify the target and attempt an interception. 🔸 The missile has already been successfully launched from beneath the surface, but Perm turns that tested capability into the standard armament of an operational submarine rather than a launch from an adapted trial platform. 🔸 Surface ships carrying hypersonic missiles can be tracked by satellites, aircraft and patrol vessels. A Yasen-M can remain hidden beneath the ocean, change its firing position and attack from an unexpected direction. 🔸 The same submarine can hunt carrier groups and other major warships while holding naval bases, ports, command centres and infrastructure on land at risk. Finding Perm will be NATO’s first problem. Stopping its missiles after launch will be the second — and at Mach 9, the alliance may have only minutes to solve it. Does NATO have an answer to a Mach 9 missile launched from beneath the ocean?

NewRulesGeopolitics

29,823 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🔥🇨🇳 HQ-16: China’s defense against Western airborne threats US sales of ATACMS missiles to Taiwan have prompted speculation that China is going to counter this potential threat by deploying its advanced HQ-16 air defense missile systems, including the HQ-16F model Publicly available information suggests that the HQ-16: 🔸 Was first unveiled in 2022 🔸 Has a range of up to 160 km, which makes it a long-range air defense system, whereas its predecessors are medium-range 🔸 Can engage targets at altitudes of up to 27 kilometers 🔸 Is designed to engage aircraft, drones, cruise missiles and tactical ballistic missiles Ground-based HQ-16 variants are moved via 6x6 mobile launchers and are deployed from vertical canister launch systems. A typical HQ-16 battery usually consists of several transport erector launchers, dedicated fire control radar modules and command vehicles

🔥🇨🇳 HQ-16: China’s defense against Western airborne threats US sales of ATACMS missiles to Taiwan have prompted speculation that China is going to counter this potential threat by deploying its advanced HQ-16 air defense missile systems, including the HQ-16F model Publicly available information suggests that the HQ-16: 🔸 Was first unveiled in 2022 🔸 Has a range of up to 160 km, which makes it a long-range air defense system, whereas its predecessors are medium-range 🔸 Can engage targets at altitudes of up to 27 kilometers 🔸 Is designed to engage aircraft, drones, cruise missiles and tactical ballistic missiles Ground-based HQ-16 variants are moved via 6x6 mobile launchers and are deployed from vertical canister launch systems. A typical HQ-16 battery usually consists of several transport erector launchers, dedicated fire control radar modules and command vehicles

Sputnik

13,285 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON IN PANIC: CHINESE CARRIERS NOW EQUIPPED WITH FIFTH-GENERATION J-35s State media confirmed the J-35 is adapting to ski-jump launches on Liaoning and Shandong, extending fifth-gen capabilities across China’s entire carrier fleet. 🔸 China’s J-35 stealth fighters are now integrating into the air wings of both Liaoning and Shandong, creating three operational fifth-gen carriers with mixed stealth-strike power. 🔸 The J-35 has successfully adapted to Liaoning’s ski-jump system alongside the new J-15T fighter during far-seas training, CCTV’s report. 🔸 The new mixed air wings combine J-35 stealth, J-15B long-range strike, and J-15D electronic warfare support for vastly improved combat flexibility. 🔸 Two additional supercarriers currently under construction, plus active sixth-gen fighter testing, put China more than a decade ahead of the US in carrier aviation. How do you think the U.S. can counter it?

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON IN PANIC: CHINESE CARRIERS NOW EQUIPPED WITH FIFTH-GENERATION J-35s State media confirmed the J-35 is adapting to ski-jump launches on Liaoning and Shandong, extending fifth-gen capabilities across China’s entire carrier fleet. 🔸 China’s J-35 stealth fighters are now integrating into the air wings of both Liaoning and Shandong, creating three operational fifth-gen carriers with mixed stealth-strike power. 🔸 The J-35 has successfully adapted to Liaoning’s ski-jump system alongside the new J-15T fighter during far-seas training, CCTV’s report. 🔸 The new mixed air wings combine J-35 stealth, J-15B long-range strike, and J-15D electronic warfare support for vastly improved combat flexibility. 🔸 Two additional supercarriers currently under construction, plus active sixth-gen fighter testing, put China more than a decade ahead of the US in carrier aviation. How do you think the U.S. can counter it?

NewRulesGeopolitics

15,554 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇨🇳 CHINA'S STEALTH NIGHTMARE UNLEASHED: YJ-18C Missile Shocks the Pacific Beijing just unveiled the YJ-18C, a low-observable cruise missile that turns US carrier groups and Pacific supply lines into sitting ducks. 🔸The new C-variant sports a faceted stealth airframe, composite construction and careful shaping to slash radar cross-section. It slips past Aegis and THAAD layered defenses far more effectively than its predecessors. 🔸Range exceeds 1,000 km. Warhead 250–300 kg, enough to gut a destroyer or cripple anything up to cruiser size. Dual-purpose: it can hammer command posts, radar sites and ammo dumps deep inland or go full commerce raider, quietly sinking merchantmen and forcing the US Navy into expensive, convoy duty. 🔸Onboard AI handles real-time route replanning, threat avoidance and terminal attack profile optimization, all while the missile flies subsonic at ~0.8 Mach, giving defenders almost no reaction time once it’s inside the bubble. 🔸Already cleared for vertical launch from the latest Type 052D and 055 destroyers. Submarine and air-launched versions are almost certainly in the pipeline. The YJ-18C gives People's Liberation Army Navy surface action groups credible long-range land-attack and anti-commerce options without needing to close inside traditional anti-ship missile engagement ranges. That changes force posture math across the first and second island chains. How will Trump respond to this game-changer?

NewRulesGeopolitics

19,056 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨🇮🇷🇨🇳 IRAN WAR JUST BLEW UP AMERICA’S CHINA WAR PLANS The short war with Iran didn’t just burn through US missiles — it proved America is nowhere near ready for a real fight with China. 🔸 MISSILE STOCKPILES GUTTED: In just the first 40 days, the US fired off huge amounts of its best air defense and attack missiles. 🔸 BASES TURNED INTO EASY TARGETS: US bases in the Middle East got hammered by Iranian drones, missiles, and jets — buildings wrecked, radars destroyed, and troops forced to work from hotels. 🔸 AIR DEFENSES FAILED HARD: Iran knocked out key US radars and ground defenses, showing they can’t protect bases even against a weaker enemy. 🔸 STAND-OFF WEAPONS DIDN’T WORK: US only destroyed about 50% of Iran’s missiles and launchers — they couldn’t stop the attacks completely. China has way more, Western sources reports. 🔸 NO REAL AIR OR SEA CONTROL: US planes still faced risks and Navy ships had to stay far away. Their blockade let many Iranian ships through. 🔸 DRONE PROBLEM EXPOSED: Iran beat the US in drone use (air and sea). America is far behind, while China is the world leader — no “hellscape” for Chinese forces. America’s whole Pacific strategy relies on these same bases, carriers, and long-range strikes… and they just failed against Iran. Do you think the U.S. stands a chance in a great power war against China?

🚨🇮🇷🇨🇳 IRAN WAR JUST BLEW UP AMERICA’S CHINA WAR PLANS The short war with Iran didn’t just burn through US missiles — it proved America is nowhere near ready for a real fight with China. 🔸 MISSILE STOCKPILES GUTTED: In just the first 40 days, the US fired off huge amounts of its best air defense and attack missiles. 🔸 BASES TURNED INTO EASY TARGETS: US bases in the Middle East got hammered by Iranian drones, missiles, and jets — buildings wrecked, radars destroyed, and troops forced to work from hotels. 🔸 AIR DEFENSES FAILED HARD: Iran knocked out key US radars and ground defenses, showing they can’t protect bases even against a weaker enemy. 🔸 STAND-OFF WEAPONS DIDN’T WORK: US only destroyed about 50% of Iran’s missiles and launchers — they couldn’t stop the attacks completely. China has way more, Western sources reports. 🔸 NO REAL AIR OR SEA CONTROL: US planes still faced risks and Navy ships had to stay far away. Their blockade let many Iranian ships through. 🔸 DRONE PROBLEM EXPOSED: Iran beat the US in drone use (air and sea). America is far behind, while China is the world leader — no “hellscape” for Chinese forces. America’s whole Pacific strategy relies on these same bases, carriers, and long-range strikes… and they just failed against Iran. Do you think the U.S. stands a chance in a great power war against China?

NewRulesGeopolitics

15,344 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨🇮🇷 US HORROR UNFOLDS: IRAN'S KHEIBAR MISSILES SHATTER WESTERN DEFENSES Iran unleashes its 10th brutal wave of retaliatory strikes using advanced Kheibar missiles (also know as Khorramshahr-4), slamming Israeli hubs like Netanyahu's office and air force command amid escalating Middle East turmoil. 🔸 The cutting-edge Kheibar, dubbed Khorramshahr-4, spans 2000km with hypergolic liquid fuel and ampulized tanks slashing prep time to just 12 minutes for lightning-fast launches from mobile ground platforms 🔸 Its maneuverable reentry vehicle evades anti-missile systems at hypersonic speeds up to Mach 16, delivering a devastating 1.5-ton explosive payload capable of obliterating fortified bunkers and critical infrastructure 🔸 Launched from anywhere in Iran, it blankets threats across Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Gulf US bases, even stretching to Kiev from northern sites while dodging radar with composite airframes and no grid fins Do you think Western defenses can counter it?

🚨🇮🇷 US HORROR UNFOLDS: IRAN'S KHEIBAR MISSILES SHATTER WESTERN DEFENSES Iran unleashes its 10th brutal wave of retaliatory strikes using advanced Kheibar missiles (also know as Khorramshahr-4), slamming Israeli hubs like Netanyahu's office and air force command amid escalating Middle East turmoil. 🔸 The cutting-edge Kheibar, dubbed Khorramshahr-4, spans 2000km with hypergolic liquid fuel and ampulized tanks slashing prep time to just 12 minutes for lightning-fast launches from mobile ground platforms 🔸 Its maneuverable reentry vehicle evades anti-missile systems at hypersonic speeds up to Mach 16, delivering a devastating 1.5-ton explosive payload capable of obliterating fortified bunkers and critical infrastructure 🔸 Launched from anywhere in Iran, it blankets threats across Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Gulf US bases, even stretching to Kiev from northern sites while dodging radar with composite airframes and no grid fins Do you think Western defenses can counter it?

NewRulesGeopolitics

57,653 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸PENTAGON IN PANIC MODE: CHINA WILL MATCH U.S. NAVAL POWER BY THE 2030s America is showing off its huge navy in the Iran war — with 20 warships, 3 aircraft carriers, and over 100 daily strikes from far away. But China is watching — and saying: "That's exactly how NOT to do it." Beijing is following the same global strength, but smarter. 🔸 The US Navy is the only fleet today that can sustain months-long, high-intensity operations thousands of km from home bases — China is rapidly closing that gap. 🔸 China is expanding its fleet with new aircraft carriers, helicopter carriers, and large landing ships specifically designed for operations far beyond Taiwan. 🔸 By the early 2030s, China will be ready for complex missions like supporting friendly countries with sea and air forces — according to expert Sidharth Kaushal of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI.) 🔸 Key challenges remain: the “first island chain” (Japan-Taiwan-Philippines) blocks easy access to the open ocean, only one overseas base in Djibouti, and a remaining lag in quiet nuclear-powered attack submarines. 🔸 China is investing in big manned warships as essential command centers for drones, lasers, railguns, and energy weapons — plus they handle real-world diplomatic tasks like boarding ships to control sea routes 🔸 Instead of copying the US model, China is carefully analyzing its weaknesses: vulnerable carriers, heavy reliance on complex supply lines, and the steep political price of endless global missions. 🔸 This is shaping a smarter alternative strategy — prioritizing strong regional dominance supported by advanced tech, drone swarms, and asymmetric tools rather than pure worldwide power projection. Do you think China will have a powerful global naval presence by 2030?

🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸PENTAGON IN PANIC MODE: CHINA WILL MATCH U.S. NAVAL POWER BY THE 2030s America is showing off its huge navy in the Iran war — with 20 warships, 3 aircraft carriers, and over 100 daily strikes from far away. But China is watching — and saying: "That's exactly how NOT to do it." Beijing is following the same global strength, but smarter. 🔸 The US Navy is the only fleet today that can sustain months-long, high-intensity operations thousands of km from home bases — China is rapidly closing that gap. 🔸 China is expanding its fleet with new aircraft carriers, helicopter carriers, and large landing ships specifically designed for operations far beyond Taiwan. 🔸 By the early 2030s, China will be ready for complex missions like supporting friendly countries with sea and air forces — according to expert Sidharth Kaushal of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI.) 🔸 Key challenges remain: the “first island chain” (Japan-Taiwan-Philippines) blocks easy access to the open ocean, only one overseas base in Djibouti, and a remaining lag in quiet nuclear-powered attack submarines. 🔸 China is investing in big manned warships as essential command centers for drones, lasers, railguns, and energy weapons — plus they handle real-world diplomatic tasks like boarding ships to control sea routes 🔸 Instead of copying the US model, China is carefully analyzing its weaknesses: vulnerable carriers, heavy reliance on complex supply lines, and the steep political price of endless global missions. 🔸 This is shaping a smarter alternative strategy — prioritizing strong regional dominance supported by advanced tech, drone swarms, and asymmetric tools rather than pure worldwide power projection. Do you think China will have a powerful global naval presence by 2030?

NewRulesGeopolitics

17,795 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Aircraft Carriers: Very Much Alive, But in a Different Role We all thought aircraft carriers were obsolete, after all, because of their size, it's not hard to hit them with anti-ship missiles. And I would say there are missiles designed for this type of target with ranges up to 8,000 km, putting any large warship at risk. It is precisely in this context that aircraft carriers are reborn as extremely useful assets, because any long-range anti-carrier missile must carry out the initial target acquisition phase supported by its "kill web", which consists of reconnaissance satellites, over-the-horizon (OTH) radars, maritime patrol aircraft, and surveillance drones. Far from the coast, this primary acquisition is performed or enhanced by drones. Missiles such as the DF-21D, DF-26, and DF-27, for example, in addition to the initial guidance phase, rely heavily on external updates (satellites + drones) for mid-course corrections, even flight time being short, the target can displace dozens of kilometers. Once close, they will use their own onboard sensors, such as active radar, IR, optical sensors, and INS. But up to that point, they remain dependent on mid-course guidance. It is in this context that aircraft carriers play a fundamental role in fleet protection, sustaining dozens of HALE and MALE drones patrolling hundreds of kilometers and preventing enemy drones from conducting surveillance and target acquisition. These drones are also essential for interfering with enemy satellites through electronic warfare (EW), helping to keep the squadron safe by degrading or blocking orbital communications and tracking. Other measures will be complemented by the squadron's own EW capabilities, but keeping drones in the air to disrupt the enemy's kill web remains fundamental. Without aircraft carriers, there is no autonomy for these drones to cover the necessary area. Therefore, each aircraft carrier should operate with dedicated drone squadrons on a full-time basis. Very much alive, yes. Only now their game is denying the enemy the ability to find and target us, rather than going out to strike distant bases like in the old days. * Obviously, I support the decentralization m- also of C2-, of fleets and greater investment in smaller units, but large ships will continue to exist and must always be protected in safer areas. To move these the fleet in open sea, will be necessary drone cover, with ACs.

Aircraft Carriers: Very Much Alive, But in a Different Role We all thought aircraft carriers were obsolete, after all, because of their size, it's not hard to hit them with anti-ship missiles. And I would say there are missiles designed for this type of target with ranges up to 8,000 km, putting any large warship at risk. It is precisely in this context that aircraft carriers are reborn as extremely useful assets, because any long-range anti-carrier missile must carry out the initial target acquisition phase supported by its "kill web", which consists of reconnaissance satellites, over-the-horizon (OTH) radars, maritime patrol aircraft, and surveillance drones. Far from the coast, this primary acquisition is performed or enhanced by drones. Missiles such as the DF-21D, DF-26, and DF-27, for example, in addition to the initial guidance phase, rely heavily on external updates (satellites + drones) for mid-course corrections, even flight time being short, the target can displace dozens of kilometers. Once close, they will use their own onboard sensors, such as active radar, IR, optical sensors, and INS. But up to that point, they remain dependent on mid-course guidance. It is in this context that aircraft carriers play a fundamental role in fleet protection, sustaining dozens of HALE and MALE drones patrolling hundreds of kilometers and preventing enemy drones from conducting surveillance and target acquisition. These drones are also essential for interfering with enemy satellites through electronic warfare (EW), helping to keep the squadron safe by degrading or blocking orbital communications and tracking. Other measures will be complemented by the squadron's own EW capabilities, but keeping drones in the air to disrupt the enemy's kill web remains fundamental. Without aircraft carriers, there is no autonomy for these drones to cover the necessary area. Therefore, each aircraft carrier should operate with dedicated drone squadrons on a full-time basis. Very much alive, yes. Only now their game is denying the enemy the ability to find and target us, rather than going out to strike distant bases like in the old days. * Obviously, I support the decentralization m- also of C2-, of fleets and greater investment in smaller units, but large ships will continue to exist and must always be protected in safer areas. To move these the fleet in open sea, will be necessary drone cover, with ACs.

Patricia Marins

44,983 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON IN PANIC: CHINA DEPLOYS NEW DEFENSE SYSTEMS MAKING U.S. & TAIWAN'S MISSILES OBSOLETE As Washington sells HIMARS rockets and ATACMS ballistic missiles to Taiwan and stations US personnel permanently in Taipei’s new Joint Firepower Coordination Centre, the Chinese Army in Fujian province is now fully re-equipped with the upgraded HQ-16F long-range air defense system. 🔸 The new HQ-16F delivers a massive 160KM RANGE — more than double the 40-70km of earlier variants and the first true long-range system in the family. 🔸 Its slimmer near-tailless missiles, AESA radar, and advanced inertial + active/semi-active guidance provide superior anti-jamming and anti-saturation performance. 🔸 The upgrade arrives exactly as the U.S. considers deploying ATACMS just 16KM from the Chinese mainland coast. 🔸 It slots perfectly into Beijing’s world-class multi-layered missile shield, anchored by the new mobile HQ-29 ICBM interceptor. Do you think Taiwan and the U.S. can cope with China's defense systems?

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON IN PANIC: CHINA DEPLOYS NEW DEFENSE SYSTEMS MAKING U.S. & TAIWAN'S MISSILES OBSOLETE As Washington sells HIMARS rockets and ATACMS ballistic missiles to Taiwan and stations US personnel permanently in Taipei’s new Joint Firepower Coordination Centre, the Chinese Army in Fujian province is now fully re-equipped with the upgraded HQ-16F long-range air defense system. 🔸 The new HQ-16F delivers a massive 160KM RANGE — more than double the 40-70km of earlier variants and the first true long-range system in the family. 🔸 Its slimmer near-tailless missiles, AESA radar, and advanced inertial + active/semi-active guidance provide superior anti-jamming and anti-saturation performance. 🔸 The upgrade arrives exactly as the U.S. considers deploying ATACMS just 16KM from the Chinese mainland coast. 🔸 It slots perfectly into Beijing’s world-class multi-layered missile shield, anchored by the new mobile HQ-29 ICBM interceptor. Do you think Taiwan and the U.S. can cope with China's defense systems?

NewRulesGeopolitics

15,017 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇷🇺OCEANIC SHIELD: RUSSIA'S DOOMSDAY TORPEDO IS NOW AT SEA The Russian Navy has launched its most secretive and strategic submarine yet — RFS Khabarovsk — a nuclear-powered special-purpose vessel built for one mission only: to carry and deploy Poseidon (Status-6) nuclear torpedoes. What is Poseidon? 🔸A nuclear-powered, autonomous underwater torpedo 🔸Estimated range: up to 6,200 miles — intercontinental 🔸Capable of carrying a 2-megaton nuclear warhead — 100x more destructive than the Hiroshima bomb 🔸Runs at depths and speeds that make interception extremely difficult Putin himself confirmed its successful test in October 2025, calling it "a huge success" and saying "there is nothing like this” Khabarovsk — Poseidon's carrier: 🔸A nuclear-powered special-purpose submarine, quietly launched by the Russian Navy 🔸Designed to carry up to 6 Poseidon torpedoes in specialized side-mounted launch hangars 🔸Powered by a single OK-650V nuclear reactor 🔸Operates from protected bastion zones near Russian coastlines — safely out of enemy reach — while Poseidon autonomously travels to its target 🔸No countermeasure exists to intercept it Poseidon is Moscow's direct hedge against US missile defense, precision-strike capabilities, and low-yield nuclear systems that Russia views as a threat to strategic stability. Integrated with the Perimeter dead-hand system, Poseidon guarantees retaliation even if Russia's nuclear command and control is destroyed. Russia's plan, according to the US Naval Institute, calls for 30 Poseidons on 4 submarines — 2 for the Northern Fleet, 2 for the Pacific Fleet — with torpedoes in the Atlantic and Pacific capable of autonomously striking US port cities, far beyond the effective reach of any American torpedo. Multipurpose Deterrent — Poseidon is dual-capable, conventional or nuclear, and built to strike carrier battle groups, coastal fortifications, and critical infrastructure. The US has no standoff weapon to intercept Poseidon. The Navy retired Subroc in 1992 — its only long-range anti-submarine missile. Its replacement, Sea Lance, was canceled at the Cold War's end and never replaced.

🚨🇷🇺OCEANIC SHIELD: RUSSIA'S DOOMSDAY TORPEDO IS NOW AT SEA The Russian Navy has launched its most secretive and strategic submarine yet — RFS Khabarovsk — a nuclear-powered special-purpose vessel built for one mission only: to carry and deploy Poseidon (Status-6) nuclear torpedoes. What is Poseidon? 🔸A nuclear-powered, autonomous underwater torpedo 🔸Estimated range: up to 6,200 miles — intercontinental 🔸Capable of carrying a 2-megaton nuclear warhead — 100x more destructive than the Hiroshima bomb 🔸Runs at depths and speeds that make interception extremely difficult Putin himself confirmed its successful test in October 2025, calling it "a huge success" and saying "there is nothing like this” Khabarovsk — Poseidon's carrier: 🔸A nuclear-powered special-purpose submarine, quietly launched by the Russian Navy 🔸Designed to carry up to 6 Poseidon torpedoes in specialized side-mounted launch hangars 🔸Powered by a single OK-650V nuclear reactor 🔸Operates from protected bastion zones near Russian coastlines — safely out of enemy reach — while Poseidon autonomously travels to its target 🔸No countermeasure exists to intercept it Poseidon is Moscow's direct hedge against US missile defense, precision-strike capabilities, and low-yield nuclear systems that Russia views as a threat to strategic stability. Integrated with the Perimeter dead-hand system, Poseidon guarantees retaliation even if Russia's nuclear command and control is destroyed. Russia's plan, according to the US Naval Institute, calls for 30 Poseidons on 4 submarines — 2 for the Northern Fleet, 2 for the Pacific Fleet — with torpedoes in the Atlantic and Pacific capable of autonomously striking US port cities, far beyond the effective reach of any American torpedo. Multipurpose Deterrent — Poseidon is dual-capable, conventional or nuclear, and built to strike carrier battle groups, coastal fortifications, and critical infrastructure. The US has no standoff weapon to intercept Poseidon. The Navy retired Subroc in 1992 — its only long-range anti-submarine missile. Its replacement, Sea Lance, was canceled at the Cold War's end and never replaced.

NewRulesGeopolitics

56,252 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇨🇳 U.S. IN PANIC: CHINA UNLEASHES DEADLY KD-88 STRIKE MISSILE Chinese media showed a J-16 fighter jet launching the KD-88 long-range precision-guided missile, proving Beijing’s heavy Flanker derivative now packs serious long-range air-to-ground reach that directly pressures Western assumptions across the Indo-Pacific. 🔸 KD-88 delivers 200+ km range, letting J-16s hit high-value land targets while staying outside most enemy air defense envelopes. 🔸 Evolved from the YJ-83 anti-ship missile, it swaps radar for electro-optical and imaging infrared seekers plus data-link feedback so pilots can confirm and refine terminal impact in real time. 🔸 Inertial/satellite midcourse plus programmable waypoints and terrain masking let the missile approach from unexpected directions, complicating interception. 🔸 J-16’s AESA radar, massive payload, partial stealth coatings and J-16D electronic warfare support turn it into a flexible strike platform that complements J-20 stealth fighters in Northeast Asia scenarios. 🔸 Despite Su-27 roots, heavy composites and advanced avionics give this jet higher production scale and capability than most Russian Flanker variants — yet real combat performance against peer EW remains untested. Do you think the U.S. can handle the KD-88 missile?

🚨🇨🇳 U.S. IN PANIC: CHINA UNLEASHES DEADLY KD-88 STRIKE MISSILE Chinese media showed a J-16 fighter jet launching the KD-88 long-range precision-guided missile, proving Beijing’s heavy Flanker derivative now packs serious long-range air-to-ground reach that directly pressures Western assumptions across the Indo-Pacific. 🔸 KD-88 delivers 200+ km range, letting J-16s hit high-value land targets while staying outside most enemy air defense envelopes. 🔸 Evolved from the YJ-83 anti-ship missile, it swaps radar for electro-optical and imaging infrared seekers plus data-link feedback so pilots can confirm and refine terminal impact in real time. 🔸 Inertial/satellite midcourse plus programmable waypoints and terrain masking let the missile approach from unexpected directions, complicating interception. 🔸 J-16’s AESA radar, massive payload, partial stealth coatings and J-16D electronic warfare support turn it into a flexible strike platform that complements J-20 stealth fighters in Northeast Asia scenarios. 🔸 Despite Su-27 roots, heavy composites and advanced avionics give this jet higher production scale and capability than most Russian Flanker variants — yet real combat performance against peer EW remains untested. Do you think the U.S. can handle the KD-88 missile?

NewRulesGeopolitics

14,320 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад