Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

“People want a quick solution; the long term solution here is to address the mental health issue,” Gov Greg Abbott on Fox deflecting against any notion of commonsense gun laws that the majority of Americans want. He also attempts to make it seem as though California, a state w/gun...

1,001,560 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Christopher Webb
Christopher Webbvor 3 Jahren

FACT: Where there are more guns, there are more gun deaths.

Profilbild von Christopher Webb
Christopher Webbvor 3 Jahren

Californians are around 25 percent less likely to die in a mass shooting. Still too many!

Profilbild von Leia
Leiavor 3 Jahren

.@GregAbbott_TX - them why did you slash $211 million from the department that oversees mental health programs last month? And why then do you not require background checks? And why did you sign a bill allowing permitless carry in Texas? You're doing a terrible job of keeping guns away from people who shouldn't have them.

Profilbild von Amanda Jo 💙
Amanda Jo 💙vor 3 Jahren

@morgfair Did they bother to ask him how much funding for mental health services was cut from the current budget or nah?

Profilbild von Apocalyptic Apoplectic Apothecary
Apocalyptic Apoplectic Apothecaryvor 3 Jahren

Texas is dead last in the country for mental health services funding. Guess who keeps voting against it?

Profilbild von Janice Hough
Janice Houghvor 3 Jahren

Pew Research Center

Profilbild von Agolf Twitler Slayer
Agolf Twitler Slayervor 3 Jahren

Yeah, Greg, They buy guns in Texas and drive to California! It's not rocket science! #GunReformNOW

Profilbild von Cash Peters
Cash Petersvor 3 Jahren

@cooperchip1 It would probably help if, every time a politician offered his or her opinion on gun violence, the news show posted on-screen how much that person received in donations from the gun lobby. Then we can assess how authentic their statements are.

Profilbild von EARieman
EARiemanvor 3 Jahren

Did he forget Uvalde(22) vs CA(11)Oh, that was last year. Note he frames the issue as blue/red in a game of deadly numbers. Horse racing as we know it should be abolished.

Ähnliche Videos

Tom Cruise on why he wasn't interested in making a sequel to "Top Gun" (1986), which was thought to be a right-wing film promoting the U.S Navy: "Playboy: 'Born on the Fourth of July' (1989) is also the flip side of 'Top Gun' (1986), which is essentially war by Nintendo game and a paean to blind patriotism. Cruise: OK, some people felt that 'Top Gun' was a right-wing film to promote the Navy. And a lot of kids loved it. But I want the kids to know that that’s not the way war is—that 'Top Gun' was just an amusement park ride, a fun film with a PG-13 rating that was not supposed to be reality. That’s why I didn’t go on and make Top Gun II and III and IV and V. That would have been irresponsible. Playboy: Is 'Born on the Fourth of July' a redemption of 'Top Gun'? Cruise: They are two different things. 'Top Gun' is a joy ride and shouldn’t be looked at beyond that. 'Born' is about real people and real events. 'Top Gun' should be looked at as going on Space Mountain—it’s like a simple fairy tale. Playboy: A lot of boys have gone off to war to that kind of drumbeat. That is the history of war—young, callow kids marching off to a fairy-tale glory as in Top Gun. Cruise: Think of that: I am totally responsible for World War Three [laughs]! Come on. Let’s look at the reality of what I am saying—where my beliefs lie. I didn’t have anything riding on 'Top Gun'. The fact is, I really want people to see 'Born on the Fourth of July'—it’s a movie that had to be made." (Tom Cruise's interview to playboy, 1990 taken from Gizmodo) (He did star in a sequel in 2022 - "Top Gun: Maverick" as we all know) P.S: Happy 64th birthday, Tom Cruise!

DepressedBergman

59,487 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Governor Gavin Newsom didn’t get the friendly interview he might have expected when he joined The Shawn Ryan Show. Instead, he found himself pressed on the very issues that have defined...and haunted...his political career. Even before Covid came up, the conversation turned to one of the country’s most divisive topics: guns. Ryan opened the exchange with a direct question: “Do you think that everyday citizens carrying a gun reduces crime or increases crime?” Newsom didn’t hesitate, delivering the argument he’s repeated for years. “I think the evidence, the evidence suggests the opposite. It increases the likelihood of a gun death,” he said, insisting that states with stricter gun laws see fewer gun deaths. “And you look at all the states with the most comprehensive gun safety reforms, they have lower gun death rates than states with weaker gun laws. And there's a correlation there.” “California is one of the lowest gun death rates in America. The highest murder rates in the county tend to be red states.” Ryan wasn’t convinced. He brought up Chicago—a city with strict gun laws but among the nation’s leaders in shootings and homicides. “Well, I thought Chicago was the number one?” Newsom faltered. “No.....well.....as cities you'll have different experiences, but at state levels, gun safety from our perspective, saves lives,” he tried. He insisted the data proved his point. “We have the data to bear that out.” But there’s a reason that argument often feels hollow. California’s overall gun death rate might look better than the national average on paper, but its largest cities have become with violent crime rates that defy easy talking points. For anyone paying attention to the crime waves in Los Angeles, Oakland, and San Francisco, it was hard not to see the disconnect.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

408,837 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇦🇺 AUSTRALIA’S “WORLD-CLASS” GUN LAWS JUST FAILED AT BONDI - NOW THEY WANT STRICTER ONES The father had 6 legal firearms. Licensed since 2015. Gun club member. Passed every background check Australia’s so-called gold-standard system requires. Then he and his son murdered 15 people at a Hanukkah celebration, including a 10-year-old girl. Albanese’s response: tighten the laws that already worked exactly as designed. Limit gun ownership further, add time limits to licenses, ban 3D printing. NSW’s premier asks, “If you’re not a farmer, why do you need massive weapons?” Here’s the problem: Australia now has more guns than before the 1996 Port Arthur massacre that triggered sweeping gun control - roughly 4 million registered firearms. The system didn’t fail because regulations were lax. It failed because the 24-year-old son had already been reviewed by ASIO and assessed as “no threat.” People radicalize. Circumstances change. Licenses don’t predict the future. The Jewish community isn’t buying the gun-control pivot either. They’re furious over government inaction on antisemitism - more than 3,700 incidents since October 2023, 5x the rate of the previous decade. This wasn’t a gun problem. Everybody pretending it to be is just dishonest. It was an intelligence failure wrapped in a terror attack that many warned about and authorities still missed. Netanyahu is already twisting the knife, blaming Australia’s recognition of Palestine for “fueling antisemitism.” Politics over bodies still warm. Sources: Open Source Intel

Mario Nawfal

125,775 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

As requested, I'm posting the whole video, which makes it even look worse. ➤ He compares guns to cars. False equivalence. Cars are built for transport. Guns are built to injure or kill. Car deaths fell sharply because of regulation and engineering. He argues to tolerate gun deaths instead of regulating to reduce them. ➤ He sets up a straw man: “you’ll never get gun deaths to zero.” Nobody claims zero. Other rich countries got firearm-homicide rates down to tiny fractions of the U.S. using basic laws. Latest UNODC/OWID data show Western Europe around ~0.1–0.3 per 100k, with Sweden an outlier ~0.4 per 100k; the U.S. is ~4.4 per 100k. That’s an order of magnitude gap. ➤ Country snapshots (firearm homicide, per 100k, latest 2021–2023 window): • UK: typically ~0.02–0.07 • Germany: ~0.05–0.10 • France: ~0.20–0.35 • Italy: ~0.20–0.40 • Spain: ~0.05–0.10 • Netherlands: ~0.15–0.30 • Poland: ~0.05–0.10 • Sweden: ~0.35–0.45; Europe avg ≈ 0.16 per 100k. U.S.: ≈ 4.4. ➤ His core line wasn’t “out of context.” It is the context: “I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment… That is a prudent deal.” He is explicitly pricing in dead civilians as acceptable. ➤ “Guns protect against tyranny” collapses under law and force. The president can deploy federal troops and federalize the Guard under the Insurrection Act. That is the explicit statutory exception to Posse Comitatus. Rifles in civilian hands do nothing against armored units, ISR drones, electronic surveillance, and lawful military deployment. This is not theory; it’s black-letter authority and modern capability. ➤ Practical reality: a semi-auto rifle can’t contest air assets, armored vehicles, signals intelligence, or coordinated urban operations. Modern doctrine and tools end such resistance quickly. RAND and U.S. Army War College analyses document how sensors, drones, armor, and comms make small-arms resistance futile against a modern force. ➤ Translation: the long clip makes him look worse because it shows a considered position, not a slip. He equates public-health regulation with tolerating preventable deaths, waves away working policies other countries use, and sells a fantasy about “tyranny” that modern law and military reality render void.

Pete

20,579 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten