Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
"Pep would take Trent over Walker." ๐
229,179 views โข 1 year ago โขvia X (Twitter)
11 Comments

Never again have this woman @OliviaBuzaglo as host. Annoying as hell, zero ball knowledge and cackles like a witch screaming her own agendas. She was tough to watch.

Real Madrid never wanted Walker because they have one of the greatest right-backs of all time. And City would never let this happen "Madrid went for Trent, not for Walker" Trent is out of contract, younger and Carvajal is out with an ACL in their prime, Madrid would pick Kyle.

2 fucking Muppets ๐

The scouse lad is an absolute weapon. Trent has been behind Walker, Trippier & James for years with England. Apparently thinks Pep would prefer a FB who can't defend ๐คฃ

The City fans only argument for Walker is that he's won more league titles in a better team is a pretty weak argument tbh. If they were switched, would Walker have won 6 league titles for Liverpool and Trent only one for City? Because if the answer is no, the point is irrelevant.

๐บ๐ธ One Nation, under Trump, Stronger THAN EVER. Are you Trump Tough? ๐ชTough T's Here:

'Kyle walker joined this league 7 years ago', bro literally played for Tottenham since 2009. I forgot Man City fans don't know anything about football pre 2014.

City fan giving reasons why KW is better, pockets Mbappe, pace, 6 Prem Titles in 7 years. Scouse lad doesnโt give 1 reason or quality that TAA has over KW, his argument is Connor Bradley pockets Mbappe & that โPep would choose TAAโ Also, Madrid only want TAA because heโs free๐

Kyle Walker is basically a centre half ๐ and has been for a long time ๐

Walker all day long!

Real wanted Hazard badly but never went in for Salah. Hmmm. I like that logic






