Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Perfect reply by #KaranveerMehra when asked about co-contestants (except Chum & Shilpa) being unhappy after his win. KV Shayari for CHUGLI GANG🔥 Also thanked Neutral audience who made him winner👍 CC: Pinkvilla YT channel #BiggBoss18 #BB18 #ChumVeer #Digveer #KaranveerMehra𓃵

Anubhav K😈🇮🇳

1,333 subscribers

32,291 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Юмор Новости и политика #KaranveerMehra #BiggBoss18 #BB18 #ChumVeer #Digveer #KaranveerMehra𓃵

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 7

Фото профиля Veenu Singh

Veenu Singh1 год назад

@pinkvilla Keep rising and shining beautiful soul #karanveermehra #KaranveerMehraShow

Фото профиля Fractured Light

Fractured Light1 год назад

📢 My Favorite Video Yet! 📢 "Their efforts were as futile as their understanding was limited." ✝️ Want to know the truth they couldn’t erase? ⬇️ 🙏 Please subscribe if this resonates with you. Let’s spread the word. Christ is KING! ✝️

Фото профиля prachi

prachi1 год назад

@pinkvilla The host of pinkvilla was damn nice.. the way she asked all her questions.. brilliant interview!!

Фото профиля RRN

RRN1 год назад

@pinkvilla Then how can he FORGIVE #EishaSingh24 bcos she’s was the one who spoke such rubbish behind his back.

Фото профиля piyush agarwal

piyush agarwal1 год назад

@pinkvilla Waah.. sahi kaha

Фото профиля R@veen@

R@veen@1 год назад

@pinkvilla You deserve ab chahe koi kuch bhi bole

Фото профиля RUHI RANI

RUHI RANI1 год назад

@pinkvilla

Похожие видео

For me this is the turning point where Neutral and Organic fans started supporting #KaranveerMehra ... Chugli gang made him hero & he gets love against Laadlas and Gundas ❤️ #BiggBoss18 #BB18 #BiggBoss18Finale #KaranVeerMehara #KaranveerMehra𓃵 #ChumVeer

For me this is the turning point where Neutral and Organic fans started supporting #KaranveerMehra ... Chugli gang made him hero & he gets love against Laadlas and Gundas ❤️ #BiggBoss18 #BB18 #BiggBoss18Finale #KaranVeerMehara #KaranveerMehra𓃵 #ChumVeer

Anubhav K😈🇮🇳

75,861 просмотров • 1 год назад

Final review of Manu Punjabi:- 1)Celebrating after #KaranveerMehra won the show🔥 2)Explained how Chugli Gang & RD angels target him & made him hero 3)Appreciated him, #ChumVeer & Neutral fans for awarding him for his 100% contribution m #BiggBoss18 #BB18 #BiggBoss18Finale

Final review of Manu Punjabi:- 1)Celebrating after #KaranveerMehra won the show🔥 2)Explained how Chugli Gang & RD angels target him & made him hero 3)Appreciated him, #ChumVeer & Neutral fans for awarding him for his 100% contribution m #BiggBoss18 #BB18 #BiggBoss18Finale

Anubhav K😈🇮🇳

78,346 просмотров • 1 год назад

I started watching this show drawn by Vivian’s charm, but it didn’t take long to see how flawed his judgment was when it came to understanding people in the house. He painted Shrutika as untouchable. Publicly spoke about Chahat’s personal habits and ironically, it turned out he was the one indulging in gossip with the so-called ‘chugli gang.’ The worst part? He often demeaned others, including his so-called “friend” #KVM And yet, when anyone commented on his behavior, like his own toilet habits, he’d get defensive. While all this could still be overlooked, my biggest disappointment was the complete lack of entertainment he brought to the show. Yes, Bigg Boss favored him early on by making him the ladla, but instead of using that to showcase his personality and win hearts, he grew entitled. This was his golden opportunity to shine, but instead, he relied too heavily on his existing fandom to carry him through. Where was the humility? I tried giving him the benefit of the doubt, thinking he’s just human, but his inability to judge character and his lack of self-awareness became glaring. What’s more frustrating is how easily he got manipulated by others—he had weak ears. These are human traits, sure, but what made it worse was his Arrogance. At the end of it all, where was the spark? The entertainment? The effort? What I saw was someone proud, condescending toward fellow contestants, and frankly, quite dull. He had the platform to grow, to evolve, and to leave an impact, but he wasted it. Vivian, this was your moment—and you let it slip away. Karan Veer Mehra #KaranveerMehra #BiggBoss18 @ColorsTV bigg boss Endemol Shine India

I started watching this show drawn by Vivian’s charm, but it didn’t take long to see how flawed his judgment was when it came to understanding people in the house. He painted Shrutika as untouchable. Publicly spoke about Chahat’s personal habits and ironically, it turned out he was the one indulging in gossip with the so-called ‘chugli gang.’ The worst part? He often demeaned others, including his so-called “friend” #KVM And yet, when anyone commented on his behavior, like his own toilet habits, he’d get defensive. While all this could still be overlooked, my biggest disappointment was the complete lack of entertainment he brought to the show. Yes, Bigg Boss favored him early on by making him the ladla, but instead of using that to showcase his personality and win hearts, he grew entitled. This was his golden opportunity to shine, but instead, he relied too heavily on his existing fandom to carry him through. Where was the humility? I tried giving him the benefit of the doubt, thinking he’s just human, but his inability to judge character and his lack of self-awareness became glaring. What’s more frustrating is how easily he got manipulated by others—he had weak ears. These are human traits, sure, but what made it worse was his Arrogance. At the end of it all, where was the spark? The entertainment? The effort? What I saw was someone proud, condescending toward fellow contestants, and frankly, quite dull. He had the platform to grow, to evolve, and to leave an impact, but he wasted it. Vivian, this was your moment—and you let it slip away. Karan Veer Mehra #KaranveerMehra #BiggBoss18 @ColorsTV bigg boss Endemol Shine India

The Khaleesee

53,671 просмотров • 1 год назад

Four days after Ram Madhav refused to answer for the RSS’s record, Hudson Institute's Walter Russell Mead also refused. I asked the Distinguished Fellow who hosted RSS leader Hosabale on April 23 about USCIRF’s sanctions recommendation, the India Foundation’s funding of his India travel, and his role in laundering the RSS. His answer to every question: “No comment.” On April 27, 2026, I encountered Walter Russell Mead leaving a Washington restaurant. Four days earlier, he had hosted Dattatreya Hosabale, the General Secretary of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, in a fireside chat on Hudson’s stage. The conference convened fifty days after the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom recommended the RSS for US sanctions. I asked Mead, on camera, about his role in hosting the RSS leadership. I asked him whether he was aware of the documented record of RSS-implicated violence against Christians, Muslims, and other religious minorities. I asked him whether he was aware of the USCIRF sanctions recommendation. I asked him how he felt about laundering and whitewashing the RSS for an American audience. I asked him whether the India Foundation — Hudson’s institutional partner since 2023 — pays for his trips to India. I asked him how long his relationship with Ram Madhav has lasted. I asked him whether it bothers his conscience to platform an organization whose members have been accused of assassinating Mahatma Gandhi, burning Christians alive, and gang-raping Muslim women. Mead’s response to every question: “No comment.” Walter Russell Mead is the Distinguished Fellow at Hudson Institute who moderated Hosabale’s April 23 fireside chat without challenging a single claim Hosabale made. He has written favorably about India and the BJP government in The Wall Street Journal for seven years. He has traveled to India under India Foundation hosting, including a November 2024 Hudson-India Foundation delegation to Tawang documented in his own WSJ column. On October 7, 2025, Narendra Modi personally hosted Mead at his residence in New Delhi. Asked directly about these institutional facts, Mead chose silence. Hudson Institute is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization. Its Distinguished Fellow declines to answer questions about hosting a foreign paramilitary’s leadership fifty days after USCIRF recommended that paramilitary for sanctions. He declines to answer questions about whether his Indian travel is funded by an Indian Foundation tied to the BJP and to India’s National Security Adviser. He declines to answer questions about his role in giving the RSS Washington’s policy stage. The April 23 conference was the test of whether anyone would do their job. Mead’s “no comment” is the answer.

Four days after Ram Madhav refused to answer for the RSS’s record, Hudson Institute's Walter Russell Mead also refused. I asked the Distinguished Fellow who hosted RSS leader Hosabale on April 23 about USCIRF’s sanctions recommendation, the India Foundation’s funding of his India travel, and his role in laundering the RSS. His answer to every question: “No comment.” On April 27, 2026, I encountered Walter Russell Mead leaving a Washington restaurant. Four days earlier, he had hosted Dattatreya Hosabale, the General Secretary of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, in a fireside chat on Hudson’s stage. The conference convened fifty days after the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom recommended the RSS for US sanctions. I asked Mead, on camera, about his role in hosting the RSS leadership. I asked him whether he was aware of the documented record of RSS-implicated violence against Christians, Muslims, and other religious minorities. I asked him whether he was aware of the USCIRF sanctions recommendation. I asked him how he felt about laundering and whitewashing the RSS for an American audience. I asked him whether the India Foundation — Hudson’s institutional partner since 2023 — pays for his trips to India. I asked him how long his relationship with Ram Madhav has lasted. I asked him whether it bothers his conscience to platform an organization whose members have been accused of assassinating Mahatma Gandhi, burning Christians alive, and gang-raping Muslim women. Mead’s response to every question: “No comment.” Walter Russell Mead is the Distinguished Fellow at Hudson Institute who moderated Hosabale’s April 23 fireside chat without challenging a single claim Hosabale made. He has written favorably about India and the BJP government in The Wall Street Journal for seven years. He has traveled to India under India Foundation hosting, including a November 2024 Hudson-India Foundation delegation to Tawang documented in his own WSJ column. On October 7, 2025, Narendra Modi personally hosted Mead at his residence in New Delhi. Asked directly about these institutional facts, Mead chose silence. Hudson Institute is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization. Its Distinguished Fellow declines to answer questions about hosting a foreign paramilitary’s leadership fifty days after USCIRF recommended that paramilitary for sanctions. He declines to answer questions about whether his Indian travel is funded by an Indian Foundation tied to the BJP and to India’s National Security Adviser. He declines to answer questions about his role in giving the RSS Washington’s policy stage. The April 23 conference was the test of whether anyone would do their job. Mead’s “no comment” is the answer.

Pieter Friedrich

14,076 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: The man shot by ICE agents in California went MISSING, after an eye witness came forward directly contradicting DHS’s version of events… And when he finally resurfaced, a judge ordered his RELEASE... only for the government immediately appealed that decision. Carlos Ivan Mendoza Hernandez, who was NOT a gang member, or murderer, as DHS claimed, was shot SIX TIMES by ICE, underwent multiple surgeries, the very next day was discharged from the hospital, and immediately taken into federal custody. And then, his own attorney could not locate him, and wasn’t given any information on his condition. Tuesday, his criminal complaint was unsealed, he went to court, and a judge ordered his release. The government then stepped in to appeal that order, and keep him detained… claiming he’s “a danger to the community if released.” Because he drove his car “close to the bodies of the ICE agents” after attempting to flee. Federal agents claim this was a “targeted stop” and that they opened fire in self-defense after he “weaponized” his car. But, a civilian witness, with dashcam footage, says something very different… and her account matches Hernandez’s. She says agents were already surrounding his car, striking his window… when a single shot rang out. The car THEN began to back up, trying to leave, and multiple shots followed in rapid succession. He did not try to hit agents with his car… he only reversed AFTER a gun was fired at him. And in the video, you can see the agent does, in fact, have his gun pulled, aiming at Hernandez, before he reverses. Hernandez told his attorney the same thing from his hospital bed… that he pulled over, handed over his license, asked to call his wife… an agents fired their weapon, and THEN he drove away in fear. Two separate accounts. Same sequence. ICE shoots first… then claims self-defense. The witness also says agents were pointing guns into active traffic, at random cars, putting everyone on that road at risk… Again, showing that ICE agents are the real danger to communities. But, what makes this more alarming is the custody timeline… Hernandez was shot, hospitalized, transferred into federal custody, disappeared from contact with his attorney, then reappeared in court where a judge ordered his release, only for the government to immediately appeal and continue fighting his detention. That raises serious questions about due process, and transparency in federal custody, after a use-of-force incident. Because at every stage, the “facts” being asserted by DHS are being directly challenged by eyewitness accounts, physical footage, and now, even the procedural outcome in court.

🚨BREAKING: The man shot by ICE agents in California went MISSING, after an eye witness came forward directly contradicting DHS’s version of events… And when he finally resurfaced, a judge ordered his RELEASE... only for the government immediately appealed that decision. Carlos Ivan Mendoza Hernandez, who was NOT a gang member, or murderer, as DHS claimed, was shot SIX TIMES by ICE, underwent multiple surgeries, the very next day was discharged from the hospital, and immediately taken into federal custody. And then, his own attorney could not locate him, and wasn’t given any information on his condition. Tuesday, his criminal complaint was unsealed, he went to court, and a judge ordered his release. The government then stepped in to appeal that order, and keep him detained… claiming he’s “a danger to the community if released.” Because he drove his car “close to the bodies of the ICE agents” after attempting to flee. Federal agents claim this was a “targeted stop” and that they opened fire in self-defense after he “weaponized” his car. But, a civilian witness, with dashcam footage, says something very different… and her account matches Hernandez’s. She says agents were already surrounding his car, striking his window… when a single shot rang out. The car THEN began to back up, trying to leave, and multiple shots followed in rapid succession. He did not try to hit agents with his car… he only reversed AFTER a gun was fired at him. And in the video, you can see the agent does, in fact, have his gun pulled, aiming at Hernandez, before he reverses. Hernandez told his attorney the same thing from his hospital bed… that he pulled over, handed over his license, asked to call his wife… an agents fired their weapon, and THEN he drove away in fear. Two separate accounts. Same sequence. ICE shoots first… then claims self-defense. The witness also says agents were pointing guns into active traffic, at random cars, putting everyone on that road at risk… Again, showing that ICE agents are the real danger to communities. But, what makes this more alarming is the custody timeline… Hernandez was shot, hospitalized, transferred into federal custody, disappeared from contact with his attorney, then reappeared in court where a judge ordered his release, only for the government to immediately appeal and continue fighting his detention. That raises serious questions about due process, and transparency in federal custody, after a use-of-force incident. Because at every stage, the “facts” being asserted by DHS are being directly challenged by eyewitness accounts, physical footage, and now, even the procedural outcome in court.

Jesus Freakin Congress

40,633 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

A #Muslim street vendor from #Kurnool, #AndhraPradesh, was made to eat his own food to prove he was not committing “food jihad” before a group of YouTubers during the #MedaramJatara in #Telangana. After being publicly harassed by the YouTubers, he received support not only from residents in his town but also from influencers and political parties, who slammed the YouTube journalists for making videos for “views and likes.” A group from #TejaswiNews channel approached the man named Shaik Shaiksha Vali and began questioning him about the validity of the food he sells. “I have already dialled 100. There is no manufacturing date or expiration date on this (bread). The authorities should answer for this,” journalist Balaji from the news channel could be heard saying in the video. However, Vali explained that he works for a boss who gets him the ingredients. “I only sell here, I don’t know where the bread gets made,” he told the YouTubers. While they continued to “investigate” his food, a member of the group raised concerns over how Vali is selling khova bun for Rs 10 when other shops don’t sell it for even Rs 100. “There has to be something wrong here if he can sell it for Rs 10,” a woman from Tejaswi News said. They further demanded he show his Aadhaar card to prove his “identity.” Vali, who did not have his Aadhaar card with him at the time, came under even greater suspicion. Later, they asked him to eat the bread to show that what he was selling was not harmful to children and adults. After the YouTube video drew widespread condemnation online, an influencer visited Vali’s locality to show support for his business. Several locals were seen eating the khova bun and many said they had been regular customers for years. One woman said, “I’ve been eating it regularly, and I have not faced anything.” Another customer echoed the claim, saying, “We have been having the same sweet for years, we don’t feel it is unsafe.” “There is no Hindu-Muslim between us. We have been living peacefully for years,” a resident said. Additionally, #Telugu influencer Shan Renjarla Rajesh, on February 10, took to Instagram shedding light on the incident and said, “Chi Chi, are you angry with the one who sells 10 10-rupee bun?” Local social media personality Dasaram Ashish Kumar posted a clip of the YouTube video and said, “Don’t worry, brother, we are with you.”

A #Muslim street vendor from #Kurnool, #AndhraPradesh, was made to eat his own food to prove he was not committing “food jihad” before a group of YouTubers during the #MedaramJatara in #Telangana. After being publicly harassed by the YouTubers, he received support not only from residents in his town but also from influencers and political parties, who slammed the YouTube journalists for making videos for “views and likes.” A group from #TejaswiNews channel approached the man named Shaik Shaiksha Vali and began questioning him about the validity of the food he sells. “I have already dialled 100. There is no manufacturing date or expiration date on this (bread). The authorities should answer for this,” journalist Balaji from the news channel could be heard saying in the video. However, Vali explained that he works for a boss who gets him the ingredients. “I only sell here, I don’t know where the bread gets made,” he told the YouTubers. While they continued to “investigate” his food, a member of the group raised concerns over how Vali is selling khova bun for Rs 10 when other shops don’t sell it for even Rs 100. “There has to be something wrong here if he can sell it for Rs 10,” a woman from Tejaswi News said. They further demanded he show his Aadhaar card to prove his “identity.” Vali, who did not have his Aadhaar card with him at the time, came under even greater suspicion. Later, they asked him to eat the bread to show that what he was selling was not harmful to children and adults. After the YouTube video drew widespread condemnation online, an influencer visited Vali’s locality to show support for his business. Several locals were seen eating the khova bun and many said they had been regular customers for years. One woman said, “I’ve been eating it regularly, and I have not faced anything.” Another customer echoed the claim, saying, “We have been having the same sweet for years, we don’t feel it is unsafe.” “There is no Hindu-Muslim between us. We have been living peacefully for years,” a resident said. Additionally, #Telugu influencer Shan Renjarla Rajesh, on February 10, took to Instagram shedding light on the incident and said, “Chi Chi, are you angry with the one who sells 10 10-rupee bun?” Local social media personality Dasaram Ashish Kumar posted a clip of the YouTube video and said, “Don’t worry, brother, we are with you.”

Hate Detector 🔍

33,928 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Initially, Whoopi Goldberg was not considered for the part of Oda Mae Brown in "Ghost" (1990). When she was eating lunch with one of her friends who auditioned for the role, she was informed that “Every black woman and their mother was there”. When she finished lunch, Goldberg called her agent and asked, ‘Do you know about this movie that everybody’s talking about?’ He said, ‘Oh, who told you?’ And she told him the name of the person and asked her agent, ‘Why did you say it like that?’ her agent replied, ‘Because they don’t want you [for the movie],’” One day, Goldberg got a phone call from her agent, who said, ‘Patrick Swayze has been hired for this movie. Patrick is not going to do this if you don’t do it. Can you make some time for him and the director to come up?’” Goldberg said that Jerry Zucker and Swayze flew to meet her, and she was immediately at ease. “So they flew in, I meet Patrick, and out of the blue, we’re old friends" Shortly after, Swayze made his pitch for 'Ghost'. "About 40 minutes go by and Patrick says, 'Please do this with me and I was like, 'Yeah, okay.' And that’s how it happened. I said yes, not really knowing what it was going to be. It wasn’t until we all saw the film that we realized what we had.” For her performance in the movie, Whoopi Goldberg became the first actress to win Best Supporting Actress at the Academy Awards, BAFTA Awards and Golden Globe Awards. ("Whoopi Goldberg on How Patrick Swayze Convinced Her to Make Ghost: ‘He Was Sexy and Sweet’", Charna Flam and Andrea Mandell, People, 2024, "Whoopi Goldberg Makes Honest Confession About ‘Ghost’ Co-Star Patrick Swayze", Rachelle Lewis, Parade, 2026 & IMDb) P.S: On this day, 36 years ago, "Ghost" (1990) was released in the USA.

Initially, Whoopi Goldberg was not considered for the part of Oda Mae Brown in "Ghost" (1990). When she was eating lunch with one of her friends who auditioned for the role, she was informed that “Every black woman and their mother was there”. When she finished lunch, Goldberg called her agent and asked, ‘Do you know about this movie that everybody’s talking about?’ He said, ‘Oh, who told you?’ And she told him the name of the person and asked her agent, ‘Why did you say it like that?’ her agent replied, ‘Because they don’t want you [for the movie],’” One day, Goldberg got a phone call from her agent, who said, ‘Patrick Swayze has been hired for this movie. Patrick is not going to do this if you don’t do it. Can you make some time for him and the director to come up?’” Goldberg said that Jerry Zucker and Swayze flew to meet her, and she was immediately at ease. “So they flew in, I meet Patrick, and out of the blue, we’re old friends" Shortly after, Swayze made his pitch for 'Ghost'. "About 40 minutes go by and Patrick says, 'Please do this with me and I was like, 'Yeah, okay.' And that’s how it happened. I said yes, not really knowing what it was going to be. It wasn’t until we all saw the film that we realized what we had.” For her performance in the movie, Whoopi Goldberg became the first actress to win Best Supporting Actress at the Academy Awards, BAFTA Awards and Golden Globe Awards. ("Whoopi Goldberg on How Patrick Swayze Convinced Her to Make Ghost: ‘He Was Sexy and Sweet’", Charna Flam and Andrea Mandell, People, 2024, "Whoopi Goldberg Makes Honest Confession About ‘Ghost’ Co-Star Patrick Swayze", Rachelle Lewis, Parade, 2026 & IMDb) P.S: On this day, 36 years ago, "Ghost" (1990) was released in the USA.

DepressedBergman

423,838 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

In 2021, South Dakota gubernatorial candidate Dusty Johnson Rep. Dusty Johnson made an awkward video to the sound of Taylor Swift’s song “Shake It Off”. The video was about vaxxed individuals no longer needing to wear masks It’s worth noting that in South Dakota, the state Johnson is currently running to govern, there was no mask mandate, so Johnson’s video makes zero sense because his constituents already had no mask mandate. Also, Johnson’s video cited the Biden CDC, which at the time, was essentially controlled by Dr. Fauci, who belongs in prison. There are also some cultural issues with Johnson’s video. Taylor Swift endorsed Joe Biden during the 2020 Presidential election. Biden even thanked Swift for endorsing him. So why would Dusty Johnson blast a song created by one of the biggest Trump haters in the music industry? Making this even more embarrassing is the fact that Dusty Johnson issued a press release on his official congressional website about his Taylor Swift music video. The press release was titled: “Congressman Johnson’s Tongue-in-Cheek Mask Video Goes Viral” 🤡 Is Dusty Johnson that tone-deaf? Or is he a liberal at heart? I think the answer is obvious… As I pointed out, Dusty’s record also consists of him being a Liz Cheney Liz Cheney fanboy. Dusty voted to keep Cheney a part of GOP House leadership despite her involvement with the anti-Trump and highly weaponized January 6th committee. Johnson even showed up to President Trump’s 2020 Mount Rushmore speech in a mask, one week after Cheney called for everyone to mask up. It’s clear where Dusty’s loyalties lie, and it’s not with MAGA. South Dakota voters should vote Toby Doeden Toby Doeden for Governor on Tuesday, June 2, 2026. PS: When do we get to talk about how gay this video is for a supposedly “straight” member of Congress? 🤔 I have lots of questions.

In 2021, South Dakota gubernatorial candidate Dusty Johnson Rep. Dusty Johnson made an awkward video to the sound of Taylor Swift’s song “Shake It Off”. The video was about vaxxed individuals no longer needing to wear masks It’s worth noting that in South Dakota, the state Johnson is currently running to govern, there was no mask mandate, so Johnson’s video makes zero sense because his constituents already had no mask mandate. Also, Johnson’s video cited the Biden CDC, which at the time, was essentially controlled by Dr. Fauci, who belongs in prison. There are also some cultural issues with Johnson’s video. Taylor Swift endorsed Joe Biden during the 2020 Presidential election. Biden even thanked Swift for endorsing him. So why would Dusty Johnson blast a song created by one of the biggest Trump haters in the music industry? Making this even more embarrassing is the fact that Dusty Johnson issued a press release on his official congressional website about his Taylor Swift music video. The press release was titled: “Congressman Johnson’s Tongue-in-Cheek Mask Video Goes Viral” 🤡 Is Dusty Johnson that tone-deaf? Or is he a liberal at heart? I think the answer is obvious… As I pointed out, Dusty’s record also consists of him being a Liz Cheney Liz Cheney fanboy. Dusty voted to keep Cheney a part of GOP House leadership despite her involvement with the anti-Trump and highly weaponized January 6th committee. Johnson even showed up to President Trump’s 2020 Mount Rushmore speech in a mask, one week after Cheney called for everyone to mask up. It’s clear where Dusty’s loyalties lie, and it’s not with MAGA. South Dakota voters should vote Toby Doeden Toby Doeden for Governor on Tuesday, June 2, 2026. PS: When do we get to talk about how gay this video is for a supposedly “straight” member of Congress? 🤔 I have lots of questions.

Laura Loomer

77,388 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

VeryDarkMan is trending because he revealed that Bobrisky never went to jail, after EFCC collected ₦15M Bribe. As Falz and Femi Falana tried to pull Presidential strings. [Full Gist Now the EFCC have invited VDM to come and assist them in investigating the EFCC. So, earlier today VDM in a video hinted that Bobrisky is broke after being unable to pay back the ₦4M he borrowed from someone when he was in 'Jail'. When the man persistently demanded for his money, Bobrisky threatened to blackmail him, by reminding the man that, he kissed and did gay stuffs with him. VDM then said it was just the beginning. And if BOb doesn't pay back immediately, he'd expose more. This evening VDM made another stunning reveal, exposing a recorded Bobrisky phone call. Where Bob narrated how. He was originally arrested for Naira Abuse. Then, EFCC added "money laundering" to his charges. He explained to them that he has over 5 million followers on social media and makes his money legitimately from influencing gigs. But, EFCC didn't believe. They instead, asked him to pay ₦15M for them to clear the money laundering charges. He didn't have the money, so he called some unnamed persons loyal to him, to help him raise the funds. Amongst which was "Elle". Who gave him ₦8M. He managed to raise the ₦15M to bribe EFCC, then they removed the charges of Money Laundering. And if you recall, when Bobrisky was originally arrested on April 4th. Everyone suspected it was on charges of homosexuality, until EFCC stated that he was in for Naira abuse. Then later EFCC stated that he's also guilty of Money laundering totaling his charges to 6. Four for Naira abuse, two for money laundering. He was accused of money laundering because he failed to declare activity of his business Bob Express after receiving ₦127.7M in his Eco Bank account and another ₦53M. All of these were made known the next day. April 5th. Then, on his first court appearance, EFCC lawyers TOLD the judge to please strike out 5&6 of Laundering charges, due to a successful 'late night' meeting. Yeah, they said this to the media. Perhaps, this is the "late night meeting" they were talking about. It didn't end there.. On the same phone call, Bobrisky explained how after the court sentenced him to six months imprisonment, his "Godfather" called him and told him not to worry, that he won't enter that Ikoyi prison. Instantly, the unnamed godfather, called the controller general of Nigeria prisons, and told him to get Bobrisky an apartment near the prison. He will stay there on the condition that, he doesn't come out till the sentence is complete. Obviously, Bob will agree. He agreed. So, when it was about two weeks for him to be released. His friend, Rapper and activist, Falz called him on phone and tried to help him get a federal pardon. Then, involved SAN Femi Falana who allegedly asked Bob to pay ₦10M for them to get him a Presidential pardon. Which will absolve his name of any wrongdoing. Basically, with the pardon, the whole money laundering, Naira abuse or jail thing will not appear on his records. That was how Falz and the reputable Femi Falana were dragged into this intriguing debacle. Bob said he pled guilty because he thought it will make his case easier. Implying that after discussing with the EFCC guys, it was clear that they'd still do whatever they wanted regardless of what he said or didn't say. Inferring from the money laundering drama. Now, Nigerians are suspecting that Falz is perhaps a brotherhood. While his fans are saying, perhaps he just wanted to help based on the "Activist" he is. However, even before now. Fans have had reasons to suspect Bobrisky was never in jail. Because according to screenshots that he posted himself after his release, he was still communicating properly with his phone, even ordered skincare online from Beauty Hut and the loud vendor allegedly casted it. Follow Trending Explained for daily explanations of trending topics. Cont in Thread.

VeryDarkMan is trending because he revealed that Bobrisky never went to jail, after EFCC collected ₦15M Bribe. As Falz and Femi Falana tried to pull Presidential strings. [Full Gist Now the EFCC have invited VDM to come and assist them in investigating the EFCC. So, earlier today VDM in a video hinted that Bobrisky is broke after being unable to pay back the ₦4M he borrowed from someone when he was in 'Jail'. When the man persistently demanded for his money, Bobrisky threatened to blackmail him, by reminding the man that, he kissed and did gay stuffs with him. VDM then said it was just the beginning. And if BOb doesn't pay back immediately, he'd expose more. This evening VDM made another stunning reveal, exposing a recorded Bobrisky phone call. Where Bob narrated how. He was originally arrested for Naira Abuse. Then, EFCC added "money laundering" to his charges. He explained to them that he has over 5 million followers on social media and makes his money legitimately from influencing gigs. But, EFCC didn't believe. They instead, asked him to pay ₦15M for them to clear the money laundering charges. He didn't have the money, so he called some unnamed persons loyal to him, to help him raise the funds. Amongst which was "Elle". Who gave him ₦8M. He managed to raise the ₦15M to bribe EFCC, then they removed the charges of Money Laundering. And if you recall, when Bobrisky was originally arrested on April 4th. Everyone suspected it was on charges of homosexuality, until EFCC stated that he was in for Naira abuse. Then later EFCC stated that he's also guilty of Money laundering totaling his charges to 6. Four for Naira abuse, two for money laundering. He was accused of money laundering because he failed to declare activity of his business Bob Express after receiving ₦127.7M in his Eco Bank account and another ₦53M. All of these were made known the next day. April 5th. Then, on his first court appearance, EFCC lawyers TOLD the judge to please strike out 5&6 of Laundering charges, due to a successful 'late night' meeting. Yeah, they said this to the media. Perhaps, this is the "late night meeting" they were talking about. It didn't end there.. On the same phone call, Bobrisky explained how after the court sentenced him to six months imprisonment, his "Godfather" called him and told him not to worry, that he won't enter that Ikoyi prison. Instantly, the unnamed godfather, called the controller general of Nigeria prisons, and told him to get Bobrisky an apartment near the prison. He will stay there on the condition that, he doesn't come out till the sentence is complete. Obviously, Bob will agree. He agreed. So, when it was about two weeks for him to be released. His friend, Rapper and activist, Falz called him on phone and tried to help him get a federal pardon. Then, involved SAN Femi Falana who allegedly asked Bob to pay ₦10M for them to get him a Presidential pardon. Which will absolve his name of any wrongdoing. Basically, with the pardon, the whole money laundering, Naira abuse or jail thing will not appear on his records. That was how Falz and the reputable Femi Falana were dragged into this intriguing debacle. Bob said he pled guilty because he thought it will make his case easier. Implying that after discussing with the EFCC guys, it was clear that they'd still do whatever they wanted regardless of what he said or didn't say. Inferring from the money laundering drama. Now, Nigerians are suspecting that Falz is perhaps a brotherhood. While his fans are saying, perhaps he just wanted to help based on the "Activist" he is. However, even before now. Fans have had reasons to suspect Bobrisky was never in jail. Because according to screenshots that he posted himself after his release, he was still communicating properly with his phone, even ordered skincare online from Beauty Hut and the loud vendor allegedly casted it. Follow Trending Explained for daily explanations of trending topics. Cont in Thread.

Trending Explained

243,366 просмотров • 1 год назад

More revelations are coming out about Jim Goad, including the revelation that the criticism people leveled at him online---including myself---may have played a role in the crushing depression that led him to take his own life. In his podcast yesterday memorializing Goad, Gavin McInnes states that he believes Goad's 2024 debate with Owen Benjamin broke Goad mentally. Not only is he visibly tired and flustered during the debate, Benjamin accused Goad of abandoning his severely autistic son. According to McInnes, after the debate, Goad told McInnes, "He's right. I did abandon my son." Apparently this was the first time Goad ever conceded that one of his critics was right about him. McInnes---a close friend of Goad's---also claims "in many ways, he was already dead. Last time I spoke to him, I had solutions to his problems, but he wasn't interested." I was the one who discovered what Goad did to his son all the way back in 2018; around the time of the infamous Luke Ford stream (where me, Nick Fuentes, Baked Alaska, and a bunch of others clowned on Goad for hours), a local Atlanta TV station ran a story about how Goad's then ten-year-old son had formed a bond with a local Santa. Goad had split up with his wife Shannon some years before, admitting in one of his podcasts that he was the one who filed for divorce. Goad was so angered by this expose that he recorded and published a phone call with his ex-wife where he refuted the idea that he was a "deadbeat dad." Nobody accused him of being a deadbeat. He was accused of abandoning his disabled son to be raised in a broken home. Goad's self-image of a dedicated truth-telling emotionally unaffected loner and his critics being jilted fans was a carefully constructed lie. He was extremely sensitive to criticism and carefully curated his online image. This included trying to deplatform his critics (as he tried to do to me; in addition to false-flagging my YouTube channel, he successfully got me banned from Medium and may have gotten my website taken down in 2019 through false reports to my webhost), viciously attacking anyone who criticized him even mildly, no matter how obscure they were (as Andy Nowicki reveals in a recent video), and manipulating others into defending him publicly. If you ever got into an online argument with Jim Goad and he felt like he was losing (aka every argument), you'd immediately get dogpiled by a bunch of his friends and exes backing him up. Goad even severed relationships with people he felt were insufficiently willing to defend his honor. For years, he bragged that my ex Ann Sterzinger was going to write a tell-all book about me that would completely destroy my reputation, most recently in a 2022 podcast with Greg Johnson (I believe he ALSO brought it up in an 2023 interview with Ethan Ralph, but don't quote me on that). Sterzinger confessed in private messages that Goad pushed her to write the book to "save his reputation" and became violently angry with her when she never finished it. She also denounced him as a narcissist following the end of their friendship, accused him of lying, said he would complain about "how the fame he pretends he never really wanted never really came his way," and claimed that in 2018, he manipulated her into "pretend[ing] to be OK after being raped" so he could use her as a weapon in his upcoming "debate" with me. Sterzinger also admits that Goad would privately shit-talk his supposed "friends," claiming he shit-talked Gavin McInnes to her and shit-talked her to McInnes. This is corroborated by emails I exchanged with Goad's former friend/co-host Keith Lee. Keith also stated back in 2018 that Goad was "losing control" due to his inability to curate how he was perceived online. Does any of this diminish Goad's influence as a writer? No. But the reality that he lied about himself and others constantly and sought to destroy anyone who criticized him was a consistent feature of his personality. The fact that me and others may have played a role in his depression and suicide makes me feel terrible, even if I was justified in attacking him for what he tried to do to me. I discussed this with a friend and he hypothesized that as Goad's health worsened, it stripped him of his usual coping mechanisms and forced him to confront his personal traumas and lifelong abusive behavior, and he simply couldn't cope. The real bomb in his brain was not his tumor, but his guilt. In any event, if there's an afterlife, I hope he's found some peace.

More revelations are coming out about Jim Goad, including the revelation that the criticism people leveled at him online---including myself---may have played a role in the crushing depression that led him to take his own life. In his podcast yesterday memorializing Goad, Gavin McInnes states that he believes Goad's 2024 debate with Owen Benjamin broke Goad mentally. Not only is he visibly tired and flustered during the debate, Benjamin accused Goad of abandoning his severely autistic son. According to McInnes, after the debate, Goad told McInnes, "He's right. I did abandon my son." Apparently this was the first time Goad ever conceded that one of his critics was right about him. McInnes---a close friend of Goad's---also claims "in many ways, he was already dead. Last time I spoke to him, I had solutions to his problems, but he wasn't interested." I was the one who discovered what Goad did to his son all the way back in 2018; around the time of the infamous Luke Ford stream (where me, Nick Fuentes, Baked Alaska, and a bunch of others clowned on Goad for hours), a local Atlanta TV station ran a story about how Goad's then ten-year-old son had formed a bond with a local Santa. Goad had split up with his wife Shannon some years before, admitting in one of his podcasts that he was the one who filed for divorce. Goad was so angered by this expose that he recorded and published a phone call with his ex-wife where he refuted the idea that he was a "deadbeat dad." Nobody accused him of being a deadbeat. He was accused of abandoning his disabled son to be raised in a broken home. Goad's self-image of a dedicated truth-telling emotionally unaffected loner and his critics being jilted fans was a carefully constructed lie. He was extremely sensitive to criticism and carefully curated his online image. This included trying to deplatform his critics (as he tried to do to me; in addition to false-flagging my YouTube channel, he successfully got me banned from Medium and may have gotten my website taken down in 2019 through false reports to my webhost), viciously attacking anyone who criticized him even mildly, no matter how obscure they were (as Andy Nowicki reveals in a recent video), and manipulating others into defending him publicly. If you ever got into an online argument with Jim Goad and he felt like he was losing (aka every argument), you'd immediately get dogpiled by a bunch of his friends and exes backing him up. Goad even severed relationships with people he felt were insufficiently willing to defend his honor. For years, he bragged that my ex Ann Sterzinger was going to write a tell-all book about me that would completely destroy my reputation, most recently in a 2022 podcast with Greg Johnson (I believe he ALSO brought it up in an 2023 interview with Ethan Ralph, but don't quote me on that). Sterzinger confessed in private messages that Goad pushed her to write the book to "save his reputation" and became violently angry with her when she never finished it. She also denounced him as a narcissist following the end of their friendship, accused him of lying, said he would complain about "how the fame he pretends he never really wanted never really came his way," and claimed that in 2018, he manipulated her into "pretend[ing] to be OK after being raped" so he could use her as a weapon in his upcoming "debate" with me. Sterzinger also admits that Goad would privately shit-talk his supposed "friends," claiming he shit-talked Gavin McInnes to her and shit-talked her to McInnes. This is corroborated by emails I exchanged with Goad's former friend/co-host Keith Lee. Keith also stated back in 2018 that Goad was "losing control" due to his inability to curate how he was perceived online. Does any of this diminish Goad's influence as a writer? No. But the reality that he lied about himself and others constantly and sought to destroy anyone who criticized him was a consistent feature of his personality. The fact that me and others may have played a role in his depression and suicide makes me feel terrible, even if I was justified in attacking him for what he tried to do to me. I discussed this with a friend and he hypothesized that as Goad's health worsened, it stripped him of his usual coping mechanisms and forced him to confront his personal traumas and lifelong abusive behavior, and he simply couldn't cope. The real bomb in his brain was not his tumor, but his guilt. In any event, if there's an afterlife, I hope he's found some peace.

Matt Forney

28,676 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

WATCH: Fed-up Montreal restaurant owner blasts pro-Hamas protesters with garden hose A viral video has been circulating online showing a group of pro-Hamas activists outside this Montreal restaurant called Zante. After multiple attempts to ask Montreal police to intervene and remove the protesters who were blocking the entrance to his restaurant, one of the co-owners decided to deal with them himself using a garden hose. On May 22, three days after the incident involving Zante restaurant and pro-Hamas activists, Rebel News spoke with co-owner Mr. Costa Dimitriou, who explained what happened. Unfortunately, the restaurant received multiple threatening messages and several hundred negative reviews on Google after the incident. On Instagram, we were also able to see calls to boycott the restaurant and to massively leave negative reviews. Mr. Dimitriou therefore had to contact Google with the police report in order to have those comments removed. The restaurant co-owner declined to speak on camera because he wants to move on and hopes the negative attention dies down. Now, let me explain what happened. Last Tuesday, May 19, several anti-Israel protesters held a 24-hour sit-in outside the office of Liberal MP Marc Miller, Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture, right beside the restaurant. When Mr. Dimitriou arrived around 4:30 p.m., the protesters were already there. According to him, they had around three different loudspeakers and were shouting the usual slogans such as, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” and so on. The protesters, who already occupied a large section of the sidewalk, allegedly began moving directly in front of the restaurant terrace, blocking access to the establishment. Mr. Dimitriou reportedly asked them multiple times to clear the entrance and was allegedly told to “f*ck off.” As seen in the footage, protesters also harassed the valet, who is himself Algerian. Costa repeatedly asked police officers if they could contain the protesters so they would stop blocking the entrance and standing directly in front of the terrace where clients were trying to eat. According to Costa, police did not cooperate. The co-owner explained to me that several clients dining on the terrace were disturbed by the situation, and that multiple reservations were cancelled because of the protest. He even had to relocate guests staying at his hotel to rooms at the back of the building because of the noise caused by the protesters. At around 7:30 p.m., after receiving no cooperation from either the police or the protesters, Costa grabbed a garden hose in an attempt to disperse the protesters from the front of his restaurant. That was the moment police intervened — not against the protesters, but against the restaurant owner — warning him that he could not do that and threatening him with charges if he continued. The protesters remained there and were still present when he returned the next day. Costa also explained that he had to physically defend himself after one protester allegedly followed him onto the terrace, forcing him to push the individual back. Based on an image of the protester in question shown to us by the restaurant owner, we recognized the individual as Bara Abuhamed, one of the leaders of Montreal4Palestine previously arrested at Carrefour Laval for unlawful assembly and allegedly assaulting a police officer. He and his father are also known for leading Islamist street prayers in front of Notre-Dame Basilica. As Mr. Dimitriou explained, regardless of the cause being protested, he says he would have reacted the same way. For him, this was about respect and basic decency — something he believes the protesters failed to demonstrate. Online, many people expressed support for the restaurant owner, as a large part of the population appears increasingly fed up with the weekly protests — street blockades, vandalism, disruption of businesses — while police seem unwilling or unable to control the situation

WATCH: Fed-up Montreal restaurant owner blasts pro-Hamas protesters with garden hose A viral video has been circulating online showing a group of pro-Hamas activists outside this Montreal restaurant called Zante. After multiple attempts to ask Montreal police to intervene and remove the protesters who were blocking the entrance to his restaurant, one of the co-owners decided to deal with them himself using a garden hose. On May 22, three days after the incident involving Zante restaurant and pro-Hamas activists, Rebel News spoke with co-owner Mr. Costa Dimitriou, who explained what happened. Unfortunately, the restaurant received multiple threatening messages and several hundred negative reviews on Google after the incident. On Instagram, we were also able to see calls to boycott the restaurant and to massively leave negative reviews. Mr. Dimitriou therefore had to contact Google with the police report in order to have those comments removed. The restaurant co-owner declined to speak on camera because he wants to move on and hopes the negative attention dies down. Now, let me explain what happened. Last Tuesday, May 19, several anti-Israel protesters held a 24-hour sit-in outside the office of Liberal MP Marc Miller, Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture, right beside the restaurant. When Mr. Dimitriou arrived around 4:30 p.m., the protesters were already there. According to him, they had around three different loudspeakers and were shouting the usual slogans such as, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” and so on. The protesters, who already occupied a large section of the sidewalk, allegedly began moving directly in front of the restaurant terrace, blocking access to the establishment. Mr. Dimitriou reportedly asked them multiple times to clear the entrance and was allegedly told to “f*ck off.” As seen in the footage, protesters also harassed the valet, who is himself Algerian. Costa repeatedly asked police officers if they could contain the protesters so they would stop blocking the entrance and standing directly in front of the terrace where clients were trying to eat. According to Costa, police did not cooperate. The co-owner explained to me that several clients dining on the terrace were disturbed by the situation, and that multiple reservations were cancelled because of the protest. He even had to relocate guests staying at his hotel to rooms at the back of the building because of the noise caused by the protesters. At around 7:30 p.m., after receiving no cooperation from either the police or the protesters, Costa grabbed a garden hose in an attempt to disperse the protesters from the front of his restaurant. That was the moment police intervened — not against the protesters, but against the restaurant owner — warning him that he could not do that and threatening him with charges if he continued. The protesters remained there and were still present when he returned the next day. Costa also explained that he had to physically defend himself after one protester allegedly followed him onto the terrace, forcing him to push the individual back. Based on an image of the protester in question shown to us by the restaurant owner, we recognized the individual as Bara Abuhamed, one of the leaders of Montreal4Palestine previously arrested at Carrefour Laval for unlawful assembly and allegedly assaulting a police officer. He and his father are also known for leading Islamist street prayers in front of Notre-Dame Basilica. As Mr. Dimitriou explained, regardless of the cause being protested, he says he would have reacted the same way. For him, this was about respect and basic decency — something he believes the protesters failed to demonstrate. Online, many people expressed support for the restaurant owner, as a large part of the population appears increasingly fed up with the weekly protests — street blockades, vandalism, disruption of businesses — while police seem unwilling or unable to control the situation

Alexandra Lavoie

21,622 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Our eminent TV anchor, Manak Gupta ji, enthusiastically keeps talking about the “chicken neck speech” whenever asking any question about Sharjeel Imam. In his world view, which is shaped up by the Whatsapp University, Sharjeel has been denied bail for this speech made on 16 Jan 2020. Either Manak wants to mislead his audience or he himself has no knowledge of the case. If the latter is true, I will politely ask him to ask his TV Channel’s research team to do their job properly. That statement in the speech led to 5 separate FIRs where he has already been granted bail by the courts. And even while granting bail Allahabad Court clearly stated "It may be noted that on an undisputed basis neither the applicant called any one to bear arms nor any violence was incited as a result of the speech delivered by the applicant." There is no evidence and material against Sharjeel bhai linking him to the unfortunate riots between 22-24 Feb (more than a month after the speech), therefore the speech is being taken as a means to prejudice the public perception. Even the Honourable Supreme Court has noted in its recent order on bail application of Sharjeel Imam, “It is submitted that the appellant’s role is traceable to the first phase of the conspiracy, which involved deliberate mobilisation, radicalisation and preparation of ground conditions through organised chakka jams, blockage of arterial roads, and disruption of essential services.” Nowhere, the court has said that the roadblock was to divide India or take away Assam as Manak, and other media, wants his audience to believe. Manak in the interview of Asaduddin Owaisi has asked, “why should non-Muslims support AIMIM when Owaisi speaks against the SC order on Sharjeel Imam?” Asaduddin Owaisi sahab, a distinguished parliamentarian, disappointed me that he didn't correct Manak by pointing out that this statement had constructed all the Muslims as anti-national and Hindus as nationalists on a promise that Sharjeel was an anti-Indian person and no Hindu would vote his supporters while Muslims could en-bloc vote for him. Moreover, Owaisi sahab, a barrister by education, seems clueless that he could never say in any public interview that Sharjeel is not being tried for “Chicken Neck Speech” but the Delhi Riots conspiracy case. It is also sad that a parliamentarian of some standing, Owaisi sahab doesn't mention the name of Sharjeel Imam or Umar Khalid and keeps saying “those two people”. Instead of addressing the question of Manak he starts praising himself and blaming Chidambaram. We hope better from a man, who took a principled stand when his brother Akbaruddin was tried by the court under much less stringent acts. The truth is that Sharjeel Imam remains in custody solely due to his role in organising the peaceful Shaheen Bagh protests against CAA. Shaheen Bagh was a historic non-violent resistance, and criminalising it even after 6 years without a trial is the real injustice.

Our eminent TV anchor, Manak Gupta ji, enthusiastically keeps talking about the “chicken neck speech” whenever asking any question about Sharjeel Imam. In his world view, which is shaped up by the Whatsapp University, Sharjeel has been denied bail for this speech made on 16 Jan 2020. Either Manak wants to mislead his audience or he himself has no knowledge of the case. If the latter is true, I will politely ask him to ask his TV Channel’s research team to do their job properly. That statement in the speech led to 5 separate FIRs where he has already been granted bail by the courts. And even while granting bail Allahabad Court clearly stated "It may be noted that on an undisputed basis neither the applicant called any one to bear arms nor any violence was incited as a result of the speech delivered by the applicant." There is no evidence and material against Sharjeel bhai linking him to the unfortunate riots between 22-24 Feb (more than a month after the speech), therefore the speech is being taken as a means to prejudice the public perception. Even the Honourable Supreme Court has noted in its recent order on bail application of Sharjeel Imam, “It is submitted that the appellant’s role is traceable to the first phase of the conspiracy, which involved deliberate mobilisation, radicalisation and preparation of ground conditions through organised chakka jams, blockage of arterial roads, and disruption of essential services.” Nowhere, the court has said that the roadblock was to divide India or take away Assam as Manak, and other media, wants his audience to believe. Manak in the interview of Asaduddin Owaisi has asked, “why should non-Muslims support AIMIM when Owaisi speaks against the SC order on Sharjeel Imam?” Asaduddin Owaisi sahab, a distinguished parliamentarian, disappointed me that he didn't correct Manak by pointing out that this statement had constructed all the Muslims as anti-national and Hindus as nationalists on a promise that Sharjeel was an anti-Indian person and no Hindu would vote his supporters while Muslims could en-bloc vote for him. Moreover, Owaisi sahab, a barrister by education, seems clueless that he could never say in any public interview that Sharjeel is not being tried for “Chicken Neck Speech” but the Delhi Riots conspiracy case. It is also sad that a parliamentarian of some standing, Owaisi sahab doesn't mention the name of Sharjeel Imam or Umar Khalid and keeps saying “those two people”. Instead of addressing the question of Manak he starts praising himself and blaming Chidambaram. We hope better from a man, who took a principled stand when his brother Akbaruddin was tried by the court under much less stringent acts. The truth is that Sharjeel Imam remains in custody solely due to his role in organising the peaceful Shaheen Bagh protests against CAA. Shaheen Bagh was a historic non-violent resistance, and criminalising it even after 6 years without a trial is the real injustice.

Muzzammil Imam | مزمل إمام

19,017 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Update On Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s Ongoing Court Proceedings Commences: Court begins at 9:00am; in the case of FRN vs Nnamdi Kanu Prosecution announces appearance as the defence announces appearance too, led by Kanu Agabi, SAN. Both parties affirm readiness for the business of the day — cross-examination of prosecution's third witness. Third witness, PW3, shielded and known as Mr. CCC is being led in oath Mr. CCC says he is a DSS operative for 27 years. Says he knows Nnamdi Kanu as the leader of IPOB PW3-CCC says he knew MNK since 2015. Transcription Of Examination Proceedings Witness PW3-CCC. PROSECUTION: Can you please tell the court who you are and if you know the defendant? WITNESS: I work with the SSS. I've worked for 27yrs. I know the defendant, He's the leader and founder of IPOB, a terrorist organization. He founded radio Biafra he used to invite violence to the public. My first encounter with him was in 2015, when I was asked to interrogate him after his arrest. I invited him with three other officers for interview, I told him his interview was going to be recorded and he agreed. He agreed to be recorded and also wrote down a statement himself. The interview was conducted on Oct 21st and written interview was on 23rd Oct both in 2015. The prosecution present the video interview and written statement of the defendant to the witness for identification The witness has confirmed both. PROSECUTION: You also told the court the defendant made written statement, right? WITNESS: Yes, my lord Prosecution takes permission to show the defendant the written statement obtained in 2015 Written statement is shown to the defendant (Nnamdi Kanu) DEFENCE COUNSEL(interjects): My client says the said 'written statement' under duress JUDGE to DEFENSE: You mean the 3 statements were made under duress? JUDGE: Can you prove it? Otherwise, I'm going to order "trial within trial". You have to prove it in specifics that your client made the statements involuntarily (under duress). Subsequently, the judge has asked the defendant to give element of his involuntariness to the written statement, asked that the defendant be given a sheet of paper to write them down. Paul Erokoro SAN reads the defendant's involuntariness statement: "I asked for my lawyer and the DSS refused. It wasn’t the gentleman in the dock that interviewed me, it was one Mr Brown. I was in dungeon and was allowed one hour of air time but Mr Brown threatened that if I did not write down what they wanted, the one hour airtime will to be taken away from me. I was forced by the DSS agent to write down some words against my will. And, I was bleeding from the nose at that time." JUDGE: What do you (prosecution) have to say about the said involuntariness? PROSECUTION: He was not beaten to made these statements. PROSECUTION to WITNESS: You also told the court the defendant made written statement CCC: Yes, my lord. Judge orders "TRIAL WITHIN TRIAL" to determine whether or not the statements made by the defendant was not under duress. N/B: A "trial within trial" is a legal procedure used in criminal trials, particularly in jurisdictions like Nigeria, where a confessional statement (a statement made by the accused admitting to a crime) is tendered as evidence. It's essentially a mini-trial within the main trial, designed to specifically determine whether the confessional statement was made voluntarily or involuntarily. Credit: FWP International Stay tuned For More Update:

Update On Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s Ongoing Court Proceedings Commences: Court begins at 9:00am; in the case of FRN vs Nnamdi Kanu Prosecution announces appearance as the defence announces appearance too, led by Kanu Agabi, SAN. Both parties affirm readiness for the business of the day — cross-examination of prosecution's third witness. Third witness, PW3, shielded and known as Mr. CCC is being led in oath Mr. CCC says he is a DSS operative for 27 years. Says he knows Nnamdi Kanu as the leader of IPOB PW3-CCC says he knew MNK since 2015. Transcription Of Examination Proceedings Witness PW3-CCC. PROSECUTION: Can you please tell the court who you are and if you know the defendant? WITNESS: I work with the SSS. I've worked for 27yrs. I know the defendant, He's the leader and founder of IPOB, a terrorist organization. He founded radio Biafra he used to invite violence to the public. My first encounter with him was in 2015, when I was asked to interrogate him after his arrest. I invited him with three other officers for interview, I told him his interview was going to be recorded and he agreed. He agreed to be recorded and also wrote down a statement himself. The interview was conducted on Oct 21st and written interview was on 23rd Oct both in 2015. The prosecution present the video interview and written statement of the defendant to the witness for identification The witness has confirmed both. PROSECUTION: You also told the court the defendant made written statement, right? WITNESS: Yes, my lord Prosecution takes permission to show the defendant the written statement obtained in 2015 Written statement is shown to the defendant (Nnamdi Kanu) DEFENCE COUNSEL(interjects): My client says the said 'written statement' under duress JUDGE to DEFENSE: You mean the 3 statements were made under duress? JUDGE: Can you prove it? Otherwise, I'm going to order "trial within trial". You have to prove it in specifics that your client made the statements involuntarily (under duress). Subsequently, the judge has asked the defendant to give element of his involuntariness to the written statement, asked that the defendant be given a sheet of paper to write them down. Paul Erokoro SAN reads the defendant's involuntariness statement: "I asked for my lawyer and the DSS refused. It wasn’t the gentleman in the dock that interviewed me, it was one Mr Brown. I was in dungeon and was allowed one hour of air time but Mr Brown threatened that if I did not write down what they wanted, the one hour airtime will to be taken away from me. I was forced by the DSS agent to write down some words against my will. And, I was bleeding from the nose at that time." JUDGE: What do you (prosecution) have to say about the said involuntariness? PROSECUTION: He was not beaten to made these statements. PROSECUTION to WITNESS: You also told the court the defendant made written statement CCC: Yes, my lord. Judge orders "TRIAL WITHIN TRIAL" to determine whether or not the statements made by the defendant was not under duress. N/B: A "trial within trial" is a legal procedure used in criminal trials, particularly in jurisdictions like Nigeria, where a confessional statement (a statement made by the accused admitting to a crime) is tendered as evidence. It's essentially a mini-trial within the main trial, designed to specifically determine whether the confessional statement was made voluntarily or involuntarily. Credit: FWP International Stay tuned For More Update:

Somto Okonkwo

16,790 просмотров • 1 год назад

The character of Rizzo in "Midnight Cowboy" (1969) is described in the novel as “a skinny, child-sized man of about twenty-one or twenty-two… a little blond runt,”. The all-American image Dustin Hoffman had after "The Graduate" (1967) and him not being considered a character actor cast doubts for John Schlesinger if Hoffman could pull of the limping, coughing and scruffy Rizzo. Jack Gelber had told the producer Jerome Hellman that he had seen Dustin Hoffman in an Off-Broadway play, 'Eh?' & thought the actor would be perfect for the role. Hellman was blown away after seeing the play & said to himself, “Oh sh!t, this guy was born to play ‘Ratso’ Rizzo.” When meeting with John Schlesinger and the producer, Hoffman took it to the next level so as to show that he would indeed be a good pick for the part—they were to meet on a Manhattan street corner and he showed up dressed in filthy rags. Schlesinger did not even notice the beggar who was asking people for change not even 10 feet away until Hoffman revealed himself and got the part. Mike Nichols tried to change Hoffman's mind about accepting the role, thinking his performance would imply taking a few steps backwards, instead of forwards: “Are you crazy? I made you a star. This is an ugly character. It’s a supporting part to Jon Voight. What are you doing? Why are you sabotaging?” But Hoffman stood his ground and it ended up being one of the best decisions he had ever made: “The truth was, I saw 'The Graduate' as a setback, because I was determined not to be a star.” Little did Hoffman know that he would become an even bigger star and also get his first Academy Award nomination, along with co-star Voight. (Source: "How John Schlesinger’s Homeless and Lonesome ‘Midnight Cowboy’ Rode His Way to the Top and Became the First and Only X-rated Movie to Win a Best Picture Oscar", Koraljka Suton, Cinephilia & Beyond, & IMDb) P.S: On this day, 57 years ago, "Midnight Cowboy" (1969) was released in the USA & Canada.

The character of Rizzo in "Midnight Cowboy" (1969) is described in the novel as “a skinny, child-sized man of about twenty-one or twenty-two… a little blond runt,”. The all-American image Dustin Hoffman had after "The Graduate" (1967) and him not being considered a character actor cast doubts for John Schlesinger if Hoffman could pull of the limping, coughing and scruffy Rizzo. Jack Gelber had told the producer Jerome Hellman that he had seen Dustin Hoffman in an Off-Broadway play, 'Eh?' & thought the actor would be perfect for the role. Hellman was blown away after seeing the play & said to himself, “Oh sh!t, this guy was born to play ‘Ratso’ Rizzo.” When meeting with John Schlesinger and the producer, Hoffman took it to the next level so as to show that he would indeed be a good pick for the part—they were to meet on a Manhattan street corner and he showed up dressed in filthy rags. Schlesinger did not even notice the beggar who was asking people for change not even 10 feet away until Hoffman revealed himself and got the part. Mike Nichols tried to change Hoffman's mind about accepting the role, thinking his performance would imply taking a few steps backwards, instead of forwards: “Are you crazy? I made you a star. This is an ugly character. It’s a supporting part to Jon Voight. What are you doing? Why are you sabotaging?” But Hoffman stood his ground and it ended up being one of the best decisions he had ever made: “The truth was, I saw 'The Graduate' as a setback, because I was determined not to be a star.” Little did Hoffman know that he would become an even bigger star and also get his first Academy Award nomination, along with co-star Voight. (Source: "How John Schlesinger’s Homeless and Lonesome ‘Midnight Cowboy’ Rode His Way to the Top and Became the First and Only X-rated Movie to Win a Best Picture Oscar", Koraljka Suton, Cinephilia & Beyond, & IMDb) P.S: On this day, 57 years ago, "Midnight Cowboy" (1969) was released in the USA & Canada.

DepressedBergman

120,760 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Sylvester Stallone on the "blissful stupidity" that got Rocky made Sylvester Stallone turned down $265,000 when he had $106 in the bank. He explained why to Johnny Carson, weeks after *Rocky* opened. Carson set it up by telling his audience he had watched the film with a room full of friends and everyone got up saying it was a knockout. "I have met no one yet really who has seen the picture who did not like it," he said. The film had already won best film of the year from Scholastic Magazine and Coronet Magazine. Carson's point: if somebody made a movie about how this movie got made, the audience wouldn't buy it. Stallone agreed, and gave the reason it worked anyway: "It was quite a long shot; if I had known it was gonna be that difficult I wouldn't have done it. I think it was a classic case of blissful stupidity because I didn't know you couldn't do something like this." His financing strategy was not sophisticated: "To me it seemed very normal honking your horn in the driveway of the producer and tapping on his window at all hours of the night and saying please, please, please. Eventually, I think they just gave me the money to go away." The script came out of his own dead end. He was turning 30, had been acting for ten years, and had concluded nothing was going to happen. So he took his own plight, "my inability to be recognized as an actor," and, in his words, put it in boxing shorts. "When you're a down-and-out underdog fighter, that's about as low down as you can get." The studio liked it. They also wanted somebody else in it. Stallone lists the names that came up: James Caan, Ryan O'Neal, Burt Reynolds. All bankable. None of them him. So they made offers. First $100,000 for the script. Then, as he puts it, $150,000 "to take a walk." He said no. They came back at $265,000. Carson asked him directly what goes through your head when someone offers you two hundred and sixty-five thousand dollars. "Well I said that's a lot of bread. Well after I stood up, you know it's one of those things. I felt as though the money meant nothing when you haven't dealt in money that much; it really had no bearing." He had about $106 in the bank at the time. His explanation for turning down more than 2,500 times that: a number that large was so far outside his experience that it had no emotional weight. Carson compared it to a man at the racetrack who wins $100,000, loses it all by the end of the day, and reports his loss as six dollars. Stallone's summary of his own position was one line: "So it really didn't bother me, plus $106 was gaining interest." The thing he was protecting was not the script. It was the part. And the part was the point of the script in the first place. "Many people consider it a fight film which is not true; there's only like nine minutes of fighting." Source: The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson, NBC, Sylvester Stallone interview, airdate 16 December 1976

Sylvester Stallone on the "blissful stupidity" that got Rocky made Sylvester Stallone turned down $265,000 when he had $106 in the bank. He explained why to Johnny Carson, weeks after Rocky opened. Carson set it up by telling his audience he had watched the film with a room full of friends and everyone got up saying it was a knockout. "I have met no one yet really who has seen the picture who did not like it," he said. The film had already won best film of the year from Scholastic Magazine and Coronet Magazine. Carson's point: if somebody made a movie about how this movie got made, the audience wouldn't buy it. Stallone agreed, and gave the reason it worked anyway: "It was quite a long shot; if I had known it was gonna be that difficult I wouldn't have done it. I think it was a classic case of blissful stupidity because I didn't know you couldn't do something like this." His financing strategy was not sophisticated: "To me it seemed very normal honking your horn in the driveway of the producer and tapping on his window at all hours of the night and saying please, please, please. Eventually, I think they just gave me the money to go away." The script came out of his own dead end. He was turning 30, had been acting for ten years, and had concluded nothing was going to happen. So he took his own plight, "my inability to be recognized as an actor," and, in his words, put it in boxing shorts. "When you're a down-and-out underdog fighter, that's about as low down as you can get." The studio liked it. They also wanted somebody else in it. Stallone lists the names that came up: James Caan, Ryan O'Neal, Burt Reynolds. All bankable. None of them him. So they made offers. First $100,000 for the script. Then, as he puts it, $150,000 "to take a walk." He said no. They came back at $265,000. Carson asked him directly what goes through your head when someone offers you two hundred and sixty-five thousand dollars. "Well I said that's a lot of bread. Well after I stood up, you know it's one of those things. I felt as though the money meant nothing when you haven't dealt in money that much; it really had no bearing." He had about $106 in the bank at the time. His explanation for turning down more than 2,500 times that: a number that large was so far outside his experience that it had no emotional weight. Carson compared it to a man at the racetrack who wins $100,000, loses it all by the end of the day, and reports his loss as six dollars. Stallone's summary of his own position was one line: "So it really didn't bother me, plus $106 was gaining interest." The thing he was protecting was not the script. It was the part. And the part was the point of the script in the first place. "Many people consider it a fight film which is not true; there's only like nine minutes of fighting." Source: The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson, NBC, Sylvester Stallone interview, airdate 16 December 1976

History Nerd

74,289 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Quentin Tarantino recounts seeing his first blaxploitation film with an all-Black audience at nine years old. The movie was Jim Brown’s “Black Gunn,” and the experience changed his life forever… “During this time, my mother was dating a football player named Reggie. So in an effort to score points with her, Reggie asked to hang out with me. Being a football player, he asked her, "Does he like football?" She told him “No, he likes movies.” Well, as luck would have it, so did Reggie. And apparently, he saw every blaxploitation flick that came out. So late one Saturday afternoon, Reggie, who I had never met before, dropped by the apartment, picked me up and took me to the movies. He took me to a part of town I had never been before. I had been to the big movie theater districts in Hollywood and Westwood, but this place was different. This theater row had huge cinemas on both sides of the street, which went down for about eight blocks. I realized when I got older, Reggie took me to the theater district in downtown Los Angeles, located on Broadway Boulevard. All of them were blaxploitation films. Films I had never seen, the new movie on Broadway, having opened just last Wednesday, was Blaxploitation superstar Jim Brown's new motion picture, "Black Gunn." I had seen the TV spots a lot that week, and it looked really exciting. I even remember the radio spot proclaiming, "Jim Brown was gonna get the mother who killed his brother." Well, "Black Gunn" was definitely the movie Reggie wanted to see. One being the connoisseur that he apparently was, it was the only one of the movies playing he hadn't seen. Also, it was pretty fucking obvious he dugged Jim Brown. This thing, the Saturday night showing of the brand new Jim Brown movie, the huge auditorium, I mean, it was probably 1400 seats, wasn't exactly packed, but it was definitely busy and buzzing with anticipation. My little face was the only white one in the audience. This was to be my first movie in a, except for me, all black movie theater in a black neighborhood. This was 1972. Then, on a downtown Saturday night, Jim Brown's new movie, "Black Gun," began flickering through the film projector shutter gate for an extremely excited audience of about 850 black folks, 800 of them male. And frankly, I've never been the same. To one degree or another, I've spent my entire life since both attending movies and making them, trying to recreate the experience of watching a brand new Jim Brown film on a Saturday night in a black cinema in 1972. There was no comparison. When Jim Brown sat behind his desk and Bruce Glover, Crispin’s father, and his other white gangster henchmen threatened him, and Gunn hits a button under the desk and a sawed off shotgun dropped in his lap (see below), the massive theater full of black males cheered in a way the nine-year-old me had never experienced in a movie theater before. At the time, living with a single mother, it was probably the most masculine experience I'd ever been part of. And when the movie ended with a freeze frame of Jim Brown as Gunn, the guy behind Reggie made me proclaimed out loud, "Now that's a movie about a bad motherfucker!" Sadly, after that night, I never saw Reggie again, and to this day I have no idea what happened to him." From Quentin Tarantino’s book Cinema Speculation

Gangster Cinema Central

107,540 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

‼️Jesse On Fire Just ABSOLUTELY TORCHED Benny Johnson For Being A Paid Mouthpiece For TRUMP! 👀 Benny Johnson has officially proven he is nothing but a mouthpiece who sold his soul for access to the administration. He has systematically tanked his credibility over the last year, and his desperate new attacks against Thomas Massie prove he is betraying his own base. 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 just exposed exactly what Benny is doing: blindly amplifying an unverified, evidence-free smear campaign against Massie just seven days before his primary election. Here is the reality of what Benny is trying to sell you: The Timing is a Joke: Thomas Massie has been in Congress for 14 years without a single peep of scandal. Suddenly, right before an election against an establishment challenger backed by millions in lobbyist cash, a wild, unsubstantiated allegation drops out of thin air? Give me a break. Zero Credibility: You cannot trust a guy who literally pushes AI-doctored videos (like the White House Correspondents' Dinner fake that got exposed) to tell you the "truth" about unverified rumors. The Regime Playbook: Massie refused to fall in line. He fought to expose the Epstein files and refused to be bought. When a politician goes against the regime, the first thing the opposition does is throw inappropriate, weird smears at them to take them out. Look at the replies to Benny’s own videos. His audience is waking up to the fact that he is just reading from a script provided by the people in power. You can't just do a 180 on an America First patriot and expect your base to blindly follow you. He is burning his own career to the ground for a pat on the head. I want to also endorse Thomas Massie in this post and say I stand with Thomas Massie. We need independent leaders who actually fight for this country, not influencers who sell out for a VIP pass. FOLLOW 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 and Watch the full video below where Jesse absolutely dismantles him. ⚠️My channel is under attack, and they are trying to bankrupt me to shut down my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination and silence the truth. If you value independent journalism and want to keep this investigation alive, please support my work here: 🔗 💪

‼️Jesse On Fire Just ABSOLUTELY TORCHED Benny Johnson For Being A Paid Mouthpiece For TRUMP! 👀 Benny Johnson has officially proven he is nothing but a mouthpiece who sold his soul for access to the administration. He has systematically tanked his credibility over the last year, and his desperate new attacks against Thomas Massie prove he is betraying his own base. 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 just exposed exactly what Benny is doing: blindly amplifying an unverified, evidence-free smear campaign against Massie just seven days before his primary election. Here is the reality of what Benny is trying to sell you: The Timing is a Joke: Thomas Massie has been in Congress for 14 years without a single peep of scandal. Suddenly, right before an election against an establishment challenger backed by millions in lobbyist cash, a wild, unsubstantiated allegation drops out of thin air? Give me a break. Zero Credibility: You cannot trust a guy who literally pushes AI-doctored videos (like the White House Correspondents' Dinner fake that got exposed) to tell you the "truth" about unverified rumors. The Regime Playbook: Massie refused to fall in line. He fought to expose the Epstein files and refused to be bought. When a politician goes against the regime, the first thing the opposition does is throw inappropriate, weird smears at them to take them out. Look at the replies to Benny’s own videos. His audience is waking up to the fact that he is just reading from a script provided by the people in power. You can't just do a 180 on an America First patriot and expect your base to blindly follow you. He is burning his own career to the ground for a pat on the head. I want to also endorse Thomas Massie in this post and say I stand with Thomas Massie. We need independent leaders who actually fight for this country, not influencers who sell out for a VIP pass. FOLLOW 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 and Watch the full video below where Jesse absolutely dismantles him. ⚠️My channel is under attack, and they are trying to bankrupt me to shut down my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination and silence the truth. If you value independent journalism and want to keep this investigation alive, please support my work here: 🔗 💪

Project Constitution

14,244 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад