Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Perpetual victimhood

The Daily Sneed™

134,883 subscribers

362,658 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim Komedi

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Perpetual victimhood

Perpetual victimhood

The Daily Sneed™

62,835 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

everyone is a ‘racist’ when embracing perpetual victimhood is your oxygen

everyone is a ‘racist’ when embracing perpetual victimhood is your oxygen

The Daily Sneed™

32,038 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

I think this woman has perpetual victimhood syndrome. Numbers and stats don’t lie and people form opinions. Stereotypes aren’t given they’re earned. But I’m the bad guy for noticing right?

I think this woman has perpetual victimhood syndrome. Numbers and stats don’t lie and people form opinions. Stereotypes aren’t given they’re earned. But I’m the bad guy for noticing right?

AmericanPapaBear™

62,234 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

Perpetual victims are taking tours to visit places that validate their victimhood. Notice they can never drive around and point out shit they built? The ‘Woe is Me Wagon’ 😂 Gtfoh

Perpetual victims are taking tours to visit places that validate their victimhood. Notice they can never drive around and point out shit they built? The ‘Woe is Me Wagon’ 😂 Gtfoh

Amiri King

40,715 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Arfa bibi has gone soooo far in her fake perpetual victimhood complex that even her BFF lipstick Abhisar is calling her out 🤣 This is the magic of great filmmaking - divides your enemy camp 😍 #Dhurandhar

Arfa bibi has gone soooo far in her fake perpetual victimhood complex that even her BFF lipstick Abhisar is calling her out 🤣 This is the magic of great filmmaking - divides your enemy camp 😍 #Dhurandhar

Viktor

99,581 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Naomi Osaka, one of the biggest names in women’s tennis and perpetual victim, organized an all-black tennis player dinner in Paris prior to the French Open—a classic case of justifying anti-white racism with victimhood.

Naomi Osaka, one of the biggest names in women’s tennis and perpetual victim, organized an all-black tennis player dinner in Paris prior to the French Open—a classic case of justifying anti-white racism with victimhood.

Jason Whitlock

180,918 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have poured tens of millions into funding their most profitable venture: perpetual victimhood. If the reported $60M+ legal costs are accurate, the sequel is already in production. 😌 🎬 The Victim Story… Coming Soon!

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have poured tens of millions into funding their most profitable venture: perpetual victimhood. If the reported $60M+ legal costs are accurate, the sequel is already in production. 😌 🎬 The Victim Story… Coming Soon!

Queen Esther

38,177 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

FACT: 92% of the people living in redlined districts were actually WHITE. The left has completely fabricated a historical narrative to keep black Americans trapped in a state of perpetual victimhood. Nobody forced our people to glorify violence or make degenerate music that actively destroys the black community.

FACT: 92% of the people living in redlined districts were actually WHITE. The left has completely fabricated a historical narrative to keep black Americans trapped in a state of perpetual victimhood. Nobody forced our people to glorify violence or make degenerate music that actively destroys the black community.

Brandon Tatum

106,197 görüntüleme • 21 saat önce

You cling tenaciously to your victimhood because, stripped of it, your very sense of self would dissolve. Through decades of relentless, carefully orchestrated propaganda, they have molded you into a perpetual victim—forever scanning the world for fresh grievances to validate this fragile identity, even as they profit handsomely from your perpetual outrage and dependence. In their eyes, you are little more than livestock: herded, milked, and ultimately expendable. Time to grow up & get off the plantation.

You cling tenaciously to your victimhood because, stripped of it, your very sense of self would dissolve. Through decades of relentless, carefully orchestrated propaganda, they have molded you into a perpetual victim—forever scanning the world for fresh grievances to validate this fragile identity, even as they profit handsomely from your perpetual outrage and dependence. In their eyes, you are little more than livestock: herded, milked, and ultimately expendable. Time to grow up & get off the plantation.

Yappin’ About Whites

13,473 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

‼️MUST WATCH: Charlie’s OWN Words Destroy Erika & TPUSA’s Current VICTIM Card —“Satan Loves Victims”👀 While TPUSA tries to use "victimhood" as a weapon to silence the truth, we’re going back to the archives to see what Charlie Kirk actually preached. This old clip of Charlie Kirk delivering a powerful message on thick skin, resilience, and the "victimhood mentality"—and we’ve juxtaposed it with the current reality of Erika Kirk crying victim over the investigation into September 10th. Charlie was clear—conservatives have thick skin, not thin skin. He warned that feeling sorry for yourself and playing the victim is a tool of the enemy. He explicitly stated that being "bitter" or demanding something because "someone said something bad to me" is a spiritual trap. "Satan loves victims... he is the author and the master of your pity party." —Charlie Kirk Fast forward to today, and we see Erika Kirk and TPUSA crying foul over "hurt feelings" because Candace Owens and the rest of us in this community are simply asking questions and looking into what really happend to Charlie and why the FBI is covering it up. Charlie said, "You're a Victor over your sin, not a perpetual focusing on this victimhood mentality that tears people against each other." So why is the current Turning Point machine doing exactly what he warned against? Why are they using "victimhood" to tear apart Charlie's closest friends? Now they're trying to rewrite Charlie’s legacy into one of fragility and litigation. But Charlie’s own words prove he would have rejected this current path. He didn't want a "pity party"—he wanted the truth, and he wanted Victors. If you're going to use Charlie’s name, you have to follow Charlie’s rules. You can't claim to be his legacy while acting like the very "victims" he told us to stop being. Stop acting like a victim and start acting like a Victor. The "noticing" isn't an attack—it's a search for the truth Charlie deserved. When Turning Point is crying about "bullying" and "mean tweets," they are admitting they've lost the spiritual and intellectual battle Charlie was winning. RT to remind them what Charlie actually taught. Accountability is coming. 👇 Video from: YT RABBIT CHASER 🇺🇲 FOLLOW them!

‼️MUST WATCH: Charlie’s OWN Words Destroy Erika & TPUSA’s Current VICTIM Card —“Satan Loves Victims”👀 While TPUSA tries to use "victimhood" as a weapon to silence the truth, we’re going back to the archives to see what Charlie Kirk actually preached. This old clip of Charlie Kirk delivering a powerful message on thick skin, resilience, and the "victimhood mentality"—and we’ve juxtaposed it with the current reality of Erika Kirk crying victim over the investigation into September 10th. Charlie was clear—conservatives have thick skin, not thin skin. He warned that feeling sorry for yourself and playing the victim is a tool of the enemy. He explicitly stated that being "bitter" or demanding something because "someone said something bad to me" is a spiritual trap. "Satan loves victims... he is the author and the master of your pity party." —Charlie Kirk Fast forward to today, and we see Erika Kirk and TPUSA crying foul over "hurt feelings" because Candace Owens and the rest of us in this community are simply asking questions and looking into what really happend to Charlie and why the FBI is covering it up. Charlie said, "You're a Victor over your sin, not a perpetual focusing on this victimhood mentality that tears people against each other." So why is the current Turning Point machine doing exactly what he warned against? Why are they using "victimhood" to tear apart Charlie's closest friends? Now they're trying to rewrite Charlie’s legacy into one of fragility and litigation. But Charlie’s own words prove he would have rejected this current path. He didn't want a "pity party"—he wanted the truth, and he wanted Victors. If you're going to use Charlie’s name, you have to follow Charlie’s rules. You can't claim to be his legacy while acting like the very "victims" he told us to stop being. Stop acting like a victim and start acting like a Victor. The "noticing" isn't an attack—it's a search for the truth Charlie deserved. When Turning Point is crying about "bullying" and "mean tweets," they are admitting they've lost the spiritual and intellectual battle Charlie was winning. RT to remind them what Charlie actually taught. Accountability is coming. 👇 Video from: YT RABBIT CHASER 🇺🇲 FOLLOW them!

Project Constitution

36,186 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

. Megyn Kelly covered the Dave Portnoy story on her show today and she said something that I think is very important. The new class of professional victim that is now existing on both side sides of the aisle, where people think that they are entitled to acting like a a-hole because they perceive themselves to be some kind of a victim is going to destroy everything that is good, beautiful and true in society. Perpetual victimhood and the blaming of your supposed oppression on some oppressor is the same thing as not taking responsibility for your really crappy behavior. It’s how you take civil society and destroy it. We have already seen it on the far left. Now it’s metastasizing everywhere else. And the only thing it’s actually going to accomplish is allowing the worst of the worst in society to subjugate you.

. Megyn Kelly covered the Dave Portnoy story on her show today and she said something that I think is very important. The new class of professional victim that is now existing on both side sides of the aisle, where people think that they are entitled to acting like a a-hole because they perceive themselves to be some kind of a victim is going to destroy everything that is good, beautiful and true in society. Perpetual victimhood and the blaming of your supposed oppression on some oppressor is the same thing as not taking responsibility for your really crappy behavior. It’s how you take civil society and destroy it. We have already seen it on the far left. Now it’s metastasizing everywhere else. And the only thing it’s actually going to accomplish is allowing the worst of the worst in society to subjugate you.

Insurrection Barbie

92,181 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"But what about all the Holocaust survivor testimonials? Are they really just lying to get reparations and avoid being whacked by the regime?" Not all of them - here are a few brave jewish souls telling the truth about what actually happened in Auschwitz and the other WW2 labor camps. (These stories will never be shown in the media or the movies of course, because they are the real story, and don't fit the perpetual victimhood narrative the zionists have worked so hard to achieve through Hollywood, government schooling, etc.) TLDR: The Nazis did everything in their power to take care of their jewish prisoners in a war-ravaged Germany that was battling mass-starvation, a Typhus epidemic, and getting constantly bombed to shit by USA and the allies (those 3 things being the primary cause of the more accurate estimate of 271K total jewish deaths) A grand piano, theater productions for kids, an olympic-size swimming pool with diving boards, hospital, bakery, cantina, soccer games with the Nazi SS guards... Does this sound like a "death camp" to you?

Sensitive content

"But what about all the Holocaust survivor testimonials? Are they really just lying to get reparations and avoid being whacked by the regime?" Not all of them - here are a few brave jewish souls telling the truth about what actually happened in Auschwitz and the other WW2 labor camps. (These stories will never be shown in the media or the movies of course, because they are the real story, and don't fit the perpetual victimhood narrative the zionists have worked so hard to achieve through Hollywood, government schooling, etc.) TLDR: The Nazis did everything in their power to take care of their jewish prisoners in a war-ravaged Germany that was battling mass-starvation, a Typhus epidemic, and getting constantly bombed to shit by USA and the allies (those 3 things being the primary cause of the more accurate estimate of 271K total jewish deaths) A grand piano, theater productions for kids, an olympic-size swimming pool with diving boards, hospital, bakery, cantina, soccer games with the Nazi SS guards... Does this sound like a "death camp" to you?

₿en Wehrman

119,674 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

THE WEAPONIZATION OF ANTISEMITISM Theodor Herzl, the father of zionism, believed that antisemitism was a natural response to the jewish question and that jews were solely to blame. He realized that where antisemitism did not exist, there were no jews, and wherever jews went in large numbers, they carried the seeds of antisemitism with them. As a result, he knew antisemitism would never cease to exist. Herzl's appeal to the European jewish bourgeois as to the need for a jewish state fell upon deaf ears. Convincing well-to-do jews to uproot and move to the middle of the desert was an impossible sell. Herzl realized that without a catalyst, support for the creation of a jewish state among World jewry simply wasn't there. Then, he had a revelation. In his diaries, he wrote, “It is essential that the sufferings of jews became worse. This will assist in the realization of our plans. I have an excellent idea. I shall induce anti-semites to liquidate jewish wealth. The anti-semites will assist us, thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of jews. The anti-semites shall be our best friends” Herzl believed that the catalyst needed to generate support for a jewish state could be manufactured through the weaponization of antisemitism. ENTER THE HOLOCAUST. Fast forward 80 years, antisemitism is ingrained in jewish identity. The holocaust is their religion. Their entire existence is defined by their perpetual victimhood, and they have used it to profit and gain power. Antisemitism is the shield they hide behind to commit their crimes and the catalyst they use to further their agenda. They have created multi-billion dollar victim industries, secured power, and passed laws by utilizing their perpetual persecution. They use antisemitism to silence their critics and opposition, and where it does not exist, they create it. Without antisemitism, they would crumble.

THE WEAPONIZATION OF ANTISEMITISM Theodor Herzl, the father of zionism, believed that antisemitism was a natural response to the jewish question and that jews were solely to blame. He realized that where antisemitism did not exist, there were no jews, and wherever jews went in large numbers, they carried the seeds of antisemitism with them. As a result, he knew antisemitism would never cease to exist. Herzl's appeal to the European jewish bourgeois as to the need for a jewish state fell upon deaf ears. Convincing well-to-do jews to uproot and move to the middle of the desert was an impossible sell. Herzl realized that without a catalyst, support for the creation of a jewish state among World jewry simply wasn't there. Then, he had a revelation. In his diaries, he wrote, “It is essential that the sufferings of jews became worse. This will assist in the realization of our plans. I have an excellent idea. I shall induce anti-semites to liquidate jewish wealth. The anti-semites will assist us, thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of jews. The anti-semites shall be our best friends” Herzl believed that the catalyst needed to generate support for a jewish state could be manufactured through the weaponization of antisemitism. ENTER THE HOLOCAUST. Fast forward 80 years, antisemitism is ingrained in jewish identity. The holocaust is their religion. Their entire existence is defined by their perpetual victimhood, and they have used it to profit and gain power. Antisemitism is the shield they hide behind to commit their crimes and the catalyst they use to further their agenda. They have created multi-billion dollar victim industries, secured power, and passed laws by utilizing their perpetual persecution. They use antisemitism to silence their critics and opposition, and where it does not exist, they create it. Without antisemitism, they would crumble.

1984

50,361 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 ALERT INDIA, ALERT TEXAS, ALERT AMERICA! Blasphemy Laws by Stealth Are Already Here - And America Is Next 🇺🇸 A 22-year-old Hindu law student, Sharmishta Panoli, is rotting in jail in India - not for violence, not for hate speech, but for mourning the slaughter of Hindu pilgrims by Islamic terrorists in Pahalgam. Her crime? She “hurt religious sentiments.” Translation: She violated an Islamic blasphemy law - in Hindu-majority India. This is the same language used to lynch Christians and Hindus in Pakistan, now echoed in Indian courts. And while Sharmishta suffers behind bars - denied medical care, hygiene, and even books - Muslim clerics in America are spreading the same poisonous ideology that put her there. 🔴 Enter Yasir Qadhi. A Pakistani-tied cleric running the controversial East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC) in Texas, Qadhi cloaks his anti-Hindu and anti-Jewish hate in academic language that pretends to champion “interfaith dialogue.” But listen closely: Yasir Qadhi has: ⚠️ Compared “Hindutva” to Nazism ⚠️ Claimed India is preparing for a “Rwanda-style genocide” ⚠️ Vilified the BJP (India’s ruling party) as fascists ⚠️ Urged his mosque members to mobilize against “Hindus and Zionists” Let’s be crystal clear: “Hindutva” and “Zionist” are code words radicals use to demonize Hindus and Jews. They’re not critiques of political ideas—they’re dog whistles for hatred. These words mean: ☑️ “Enemy” ☑️ “Target” ☑️ “Mobilize your rage” Qadhi portrays Muslims as perpetual victims, but his messaging fosters extremism. He’s importing the same blasphemy enforcement mentality we see in Pakistan - where people are lynched for speech and planting it in American soil. And just like in India, where it was Muslims who: Burned with rage over Sharmishta’s video Filed police reports Celebrated her arrest Demanded punishment for “blasphemy” Radicals like Qadhi are laying the same legal and ideological groundwork here, using: ➡️ The narrative of victimhood ➡️ The weaponization of “Islamophobia” ➡️ The push for “hate speech” laws that only protect Islam This is blasphemy law by stealth - and it’s already happening in America. 🔥 Ask yourself: Do you really believe someone like Yasir Qadhi - who constantly whines about “Islamophobia” while demonizing Hindus and Jews, doesn’t want to criminalize criticism of Islam in America? Do you honestly think a man whose family is from PAKISTAN, a country that kills people for insulting Muhammad wouldn’t back laws here to do the same just rebranded as “hate speech” protections? Because that’s exactly what this is. This isn’t just about India. It’s not just about Sharmishta. It’s a global Islamist movement that wants to control: 🛑 What you say 🛑 What you believe 🛑 How you worship And it always follows the same pattern: 1️⃣ Claim victimhood 2️⃣ Demand special protections 3️⃣ Silence critics 4️⃣ Criminalize speech that challenges Islamic supremacy 5️⃣ Punish the “blasphemers” WAKE UP, AMERICA. Free speech is under siege. The blasphemy mobs are organizing, from West Bengal to Texas. If we stay silent, we are next. #StandWithSharmishta

🚨 ALERT INDIA, ALERT TEXAS, ALERT AMERICA! Blasphemy Laws by Stealth Are Already Here - And America Is Next 🇺🇸 A 22-year-old Hindu law student, Sharmishta Panoli, is rotting in jail in India - not for violence, not for hate speech, but for mourning the slaughter of Hindu pilgrims by Islamic terrorists in Pahalgam. Her crime? She “hurt religious sentiments.” Translation: She violated an Islamic blasphemy law - in Hindu-majority India. This is the same language used to lynch Christians and Hindus in Pakistan, now echoed in Indian courts. And while Sharmishta suffers behind bars - denied medical care, hygiene, and even books - Muslim clerics in America are spreading the same poisonous ideology that put her there. 🔴 Enter Yasir Qadhi. A Pakistani-tied cleric running the controversial East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC) in Texas, Qadhi cloaks his anti-Hindu and anti-Jewish hate in academic language that pretends to champion “interfaith dialogue.” But listen closely: Yasir Qadhi has: ⚠️ Compared “Hindutva” to Nazism ⚠️ Claimed India is preparing for a “Rwanda-style genocide” ⚠️ Vilified the BJP (India’s ruling party) as fascists ⚠️ Urged his mosque members to mobilize against “Hindus and Zionists” Let’s be crystal clear: “Hindutva” and “Zionist” are code words radicals use to demonize Hindus and Jews. They’re not critiques of political ideas—they’re dog whistles for hatred. These words mean: ☑️ “Enemy” ☑️ “Target” ☑️ “Mobilize your rage” Qadhi portrays Muslims as perpetual victims, but his messaging fosters extremism. He’s importing the same blasphemy enforcement mentality we see in Pakistan - where people are lynched for speech and planting it in American soil. And just like in India, where it was Muslims who: Burned with rage over Sharmishta’s video Filed police reports Celebrated her arrest Demanded punishment for “blasphemy” Radicals like Qadhi are laying the same legal and ideological groundwork here, using: ➡️ The narrative of victimhood ➡️ The weaponization of “Islamophobia” ➡️ The push for “hate speech” laws that only protect Islam This is blasphemy law by stealth - and it’s already happening in America. 🔥 Ask yourself: Do you really believe someone like Yasir Qadhi - who constantly whines about “Islamophobia” while demonizing Hindus and Jews, doesn’t want to criminalize criticism of Islam in America? Do you honestly think a man whose family is from PAKISTAN, a country that kills people for insulting Muhammad wouldn’t back laws here to do the same just rebranded as “hate speech” protections? Because that’s exactly what this is. This isn’t just about India. It’s not just about Sharmishta. It’s a global Islamist movement that wants to control: 🛑 What you say 🛑 What you believe 🛑 How you worship And it always follows the same pattern: 1️⃣ Claim victimhood 2️⃣ Demand special protections 3️⃣ Silence critics 4️⃣ Criminalize speech that challenges Islamic supremacy 5️⃣ Punish the “blasphemers” WAKE UP, AMERICA. Free speech is under siege. The blasphemy mobs are organizing, from West Bengal to Texas. If we stay silent, we are next. #StandWithSharmishta

Amy Mek

187,977 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

KADUNA UPDATE - "EL-RUFAI AND THE SOUTHERN KADUNA QUESTION: BREAKING THE ALTAR OF MANIPULATION" - By Hon. Abubakar MG, Political Scientist -Part 1 I decided to embark on this research after observing how everything in Nigeria today is reduced to politics, how people twist facts, manipulate emotions, and rewrite history just to destroy the reputation of others. Seeing how Mallam Nasir El-Rufai has been continuously attacked and unfairly blamed for the Southern Kaduna conflict, I chose to conduct a deep and independent investigation. I wanted to separate truth from propaganda. In the course of this research, I traveled to various communities in Southern Kaduna, sat with elders men who have seen decades of blood, bitterness, and failed peace efforts and I studied credible academic works including “The Crisis of Belonging and Ethnographies of Peacebuilding in Kaduna State, Nigeria” and “Civil-Military Relations and Conflict Management in Nigeria: A Study of Southern Kaduna Conflict (2010–2017).” Through these studies and first hand engagements, I gathered a profound understanding of the origins, evolution, and manipulation of the Southern Kaduna conflict. My findings are clear, the crisis did not begin with Mallam Nasir El-Rufai. Its roots lie deep in historical tensions driven by indigene versus settler debates, competition over land between farming and pastoralist groups, and decades of government absence in enforcing justice and development. The conflict thrived because successive governments allowed local elites to exploit it either through weak law enforcement, political favoritism, or deliberate neglect of rural communities. The book “The Crisis of Belonging and Ethnographies of Peacebuilding in Kaduna State” particularly highlights how colonial structures and post colonial identity politics deepened the indigene settler divide. Southern Kaduna became a battlefield not because its people were naturally violent, but because politics weaponized ethnicity and religion as tools for dominance. Meanwhile, “Civil Military Relations and Conflict Management in Nigeria (2010–2017)” reveals how the crisis persisted due to inconsistent state responses weak law enforcement, poor intelligence coordination, and manipulation by politicians seeking sympathy or revenge. I must emphasize this with absolute clarity, El-Rufai inherited a region already bleeding from decades of failed leadership. When he assumed office, Southern Kaduna was a metaphor for chaos highways turned into death traps, farmlands deserted, schools destroyed, and markets crippled. Entire villages had been burned down, and the local economy was paralyzed. It was not governance, it was survival. Unlike his predecessors, El-Rufai did not approach the crisis with sentiment or selective empathy. He approached it with enforcement, policy, and a commitment to ending impunity. For the first time, a governor refused to pay so called “compensation” or “blood money” to communities, knowing such practices only rewarded violence. Before his reforms, each crisis would end with payouts creating a perverse incentive for new rounds of bloodshed. El-Rufai said, “No more.” That decision was not cruelty, it was governance. It was a rational, moral act a stand against institutionalized blackmail that had for decades fueled revenge attacks under the disguise of justice. My research revealed that what many called El-Rufai’s “bias” was in fact the first true attempt at neutrality in Southern Kaduna. For the first time, a governor declared that no tribe, religion, or group had monopoly over victimhood or justice. Whether the culprit was a Fulani herder or a Christian farmer, justice had to prevail equally. Yet, this impartiality became his greatest sin in the eyes of those who had built their entire political survival on perpetual division.

KADUNA UPDATE - "EL-RUFAI AND THE SOUTHERN KADUNA QUESTION: BREAKING THE ALTAR OF MANIPULATION" - By Hon. Abubakar MG, Political Scientist -Part 1 I decided to embark on this research after observing how everything in Nigeria today is reduced to politics, how people twist facts, manipulate emotions, and rewrite history just to destroy the reputation of others. Seeing how Mallam Nasir El-Rufai has been continuously attacked and unfairly blamed for the Southern Kaduna conflict, I chose to conduct a deep and independent investigation. I wanted to separate truth from propaganda. In the course of this research, I traveled to various communities in Southern Kaduna, sat with elders men who have seen decades of blood, bitterness, and failed peace efforts and I studied credible academic works including “The Crisis of Belonging and Ethnographies of Peacebuilding in Kaduna State, Nigeria” and “Civil-Military Relations and Conflict Management in Nigeria: A Study of Southern Kaduna Conflict (2010–2017).” Through these studies and first hand engagements, I gathered a profound understanding of the origins, evolution, and manipulation of the Southern Kaduna conflict. My findings are clear, the crisis did not begin with Mallam Nasir El-Rufai. Its roots lie deep in historical tensions driven by indigene versus settler debates, competition over land between farming and pastoralist groups, and decades of government absence in enforcing justice and development. The conflict thrived because successive governments allowed local elites to exploit it either through weak law enforcement, political favoritism, or deliberate neglect of rural communities. The book “The Crisis of Belonging and Ethnographies of Peacebuilding in Kaduna State” particularly highlights how colonial structures and post colonial identity politics deepened the indigene settler divide. Southern Kaduna became a battlefield not because its people were naturally violent, but because politics weaponized ethnicity and religion as tools for dominance. Meanwhile, “Civil Military Relations and Conflict Management in Nigeria (2010–2017)” reveals how the crisis persisted due to inconsistent state responses weak law enforcement, poor intelligence coordination, and manipulation by politicians seeking sympathy or revenge. I must emphasize this with absolute clarity, El-Rufai inherited a region already bleeding from decades of failed leadership. When he assumed office, Southern Kaduna was a metaphor for chaos highways turned into death traps, farmlands deserted, schools destroyed, and markets crippled. Entire villages had been burned down, and the local economy was paralyzed. It was not governance, it was survival. Unlike his predecessors, El-Rufai did not approach the crisis with sentiment or selective empathy. He approached it with enforcement, policy, and a commitment to ending impunity. For the first time, a governor refused to pay so called “compensation” or “blood money” to communities, knowing such practices only rewarded violence. Before his reforms, each crisis would end with payouts creating a perverse incentive for new rounds of bloodshed. El-Rufai said, “No more.” That decision was not cruelty, it was governance. It was a rational, moral act a stand against institutionalized blackmail that had for decades fueled revenge attacks under the disguise of justice. My research revealed that what many called El-Rufai’s “bias” was in fact the first true attempt at neutrality in Southern Kaduna. For the first time, a governor declared that no tribe, religion, or group had monopoly over victimhood or justice. Whether the culprit was a Fulani herder or a Christian farmer, justice had to prevail equally. Yet, this impartiality became his greatest sin in the eyes of those who had built their entire political survival on perpetual division.

Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai

34,766 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce