Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Peshawar – deep inside Pakistan’s own territory . 📍 Where #TTP fighters now set up checkpoints on public roads. These scenes show that #Pakistan’s military regime no longer has full control over its own cities. A regime that claims to possess nuclear weapons, yet fails to contain an internal...

128,739 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Siddhant Nagrath’s core line in that Oxford Union “India vs Pakistan” debate is that Pakistan’s structure and incentives make sustained hostility and even war with India politically and economically attractive for those who hold power there, and that this is stabilised not restrained by its nuclear posture. ​ Nagrath argues that for 77 years Pakistan’s ruling establishment has had strong incentives to maintain confrontation with India, including the possibility of military action. ​ He contends that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons do not create responsible restraint but instead enable aggressive behaviour under a protective umbrella. ​ He claims it is “politically infeasible” and “economically infeasible” for those who hold the money, power, and politics in Pakistan to avoid war, because conflict sustains their position. ​ According to him, when there is Indo‑Pak conflict, it is not Indian leaders like Narendra Modi whose electoral prospects improve most, but Pakistan’s power brokers, who gain legitimacy and resources from crisis. ​ Terrorism and security argument Nagrath asserts that Pakistan has systematically given terrorists a home, weapons, training, military aid, intelligence support, and guidance on where and how to strike India. ​ On this basis, he argues India faces a security environment in which Pakistan-backed terrorism and the threat of escalation are entrenched tools of state policy rather than aberrations. ​ Rebuttal to “nuclear stabiliser” claim Responding to the proposition’s portrayal of Pakistan as a “great nuclear” stabilising power, he suggests nuclear capability has not translated into responsible de‑escalation. ​ Instead, he frames Pakistan’s nuclear status as part of a bargaining strategy that allows it to internationalise crises and shield itself while continuing support to terror networks. Debate Context The event occurred amid prior Oxford Union controversies, including a collapsed India-Pakistan debate where Nagrath and peers like Viraansh Bhanushali participated after Indian leaders withdrew. Nagrath has debated Kashmir issues before, opposing independence motions. The video has garnered views on the Oxford Union channel, reflecting interest in India-Pakistan geopolitical discourse. Credit : Oxford Union.

Augadh

23,879 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The Republic of Balochistan will not permit its rare earth minerals to be exploited by Pakistan for purposes that undermine global peace and stability 13 August, 2025 The President of the United States of America Donald J. Trump administration in a strategic blunder unfortunately has assured Pakistan access to Balochistan’s vast and untapped mineral wealth. Within just 48 hours of this assurance, Pakistan’s Army Chief Asim Maulana Munir brazenly threatened to “bring down half the world with nuclear weapons” and vowed to destroy major dams inside India’s sovereign territory. After him, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto, and puppet Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif amplified this reckless and dangerous rhetoric. The world, particularly the United States, made a grave mistake in the past by overlooking Pakistan’s access to nuclear weapons, which today have become a serious threat and liability to peace across the entire region. Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is now being recklessly brandished; its Prime Minister repeatedly advocates for #Iran to acquire nuclear weapons, the same Iran that openly threatens to wipe America’s ally #Israel off the map, while Pakistan’s Army Chief has spoken of dragging “half the world down” in nuclear destruction. If now, under President Trump’s leadership United States grants Pakistan access to Balochistan’s vast mineral resources for its narrow interests, it would be akin to handing a loaded gun or a razor to a monkey, a reckless act that could bring devastation not only upon Pakistan itself but also upon the rest of the world, a danger that Army Chief Asim Munir has already signaled. If such extremists are allowed to seize illegal control of Balochistan’s oil, gas, uranium, gold, silver, copper, and other rare earth resources worth trillions of dollars, the scale of their terrorism will reach unprecedented, catastrophic proportions, threatening not only South Asia, but the stability of the entire planet. The world is now confronting an unavoidable reality: trading with Pakistan, arming its terrorist military, or partnering with it in any form is not mere recklessness, it is an act of global self-destruction, gamble with global security, jeopardizing the safety and security of all humankind. Being a responsible country the Republic Of Balochistan remains steadfast in its commitment to regional peace, stability, and prosperity. Its people will never allow their rare earth resources to be plundered by Pakistan’s radical army to finance nuclear blackmail, orchestrate another 9/11-style attack, or continue sheltering international terrorist networks such as ISIS and Al-Qaeda sleeper cells located deep inside Pakistan's Punjab province. We call upon global powers to act decisively, working in unity to dismantle Pakistan’s double game and shut down the terror factories run by its notorious ISI and its network of paid extremist proxies. The cost of inaction will be measured in global insecurity and the lives of countless innocents. #BalochistanIsNotPakistan Hyrbyair Marri Secretary Marco Rubio Department of State Zalmay Khalilzad Lindsey Graham

Mir Yar Baloch

23,030 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce