Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Peshawar – deep inside Pakistan’s own territory . 📍 Where #TTP fighters now set up checkpoints on public roads. These scenes show that #Pakistan’s military regime no longer has full control over its own cities. A regime that claims to possess nuclear weapons, yet fails to contain an internal... show more

Najib Farhodi

13,857 subscribers

128,739 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика #TTP #Pakistan

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

In Central Kurram district, an ongoing operation is underway against the Fitna al-Khawarij terrorists. The shared video clearly shows that most of these TTP fighters are actually Afghan Taliban members, their accents and communication over walkie-talkies make it obvious. Yet, despite this clear evidence, the Afghan Taliban regime continues to claim that the TTP is merely “Pakistan’s internal issue.”

In Central Kurram district, an ongoing operation is underway against the Fitna al-Khawarij terrorists. The shared video clearly shows that most of these TTP fighters are actually Afghan Taliban members, their accents and communication over walkie-talkies make it obvious. Yet, despite this clear evidence, the Afghan Taliban regime continues to claim that the TTP is merely “Pakistan’s internal issue.”

War Analyst

17,216 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

TTP patrols in Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, show that Pakistan’s military is mostly active in media warfare. They claim that these fighters come from Afghan soil, while in reality, the TTP controls vast territories that are expanding day by day. The #TTP has an active presence in small towns and the outskirts of major Pakistani cities such as those in Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, and Peshawar.

TTP patrols in Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, show that Pakistan’s military is mostly active in media warfare. They claim that these fighters come from Afghan soil, while in reality, the TTP controls vast territories that are expanding day by day. The #TTP has an active presence in small towns and the outskirts of major Pakistani cities such as those in Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, and Peshawar.

Najib - نجیب

78,669 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Taliban Foreign Minister Calls Recent Dispute with Pakistan a Problem with “Pakistan’s Military Circles” Mullah Amir Khan Muttaqi, the Taliban’s Foreign Minister, says that the recent dispute between the group and Pakistan is a problem between the Taliban and the military circles of the Pakistani government. Mullah Muttaqi claims that over the past four years, Pakistan has committed violations of Afghanistan’s territory. The Foreign Minister also alleges that ISIS fighters are being trained on Pakistani soil. He adds that one of Pakistan’s demands is the relocation of TTP fighters into Afghan territory, which, according to him, is not feasible. #aamajnews

Taliban Foreign Minister Calls Recent Dispute with Pakistan a Problem with “Pakistan’s Military Circles” Mullah Amir Khan Muttaqi, the Taliban’s Foreign Minister, says that the recent dispute between the group and Pakistan is a problem between the Taliban and the military circles of the Pakistani government. Mullah Muttaqi claims that over the past four years, Pakistan has committed violations of Afghanistan’s territory. The Foreign Minister also alleges that ISIS fighters are being trained on Pakistani soil. He adds that one of Pakistan’s demands is the relocation of TTP fighters into Afghan territory, which, according to him, is not feasible. #aamajnews

Aamaj News English

40,851 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 In a newly released video message, the spokesperson of Tehreek-e-Taliban #Pakistan (#TTP) in Orakzai stated that the group maintains an active presence and positions in its own areas. Orakzai KP 📍 He claimed that behind their forces, there used to be Pakistani military posts which now no longer exist. The spokesperson added that TTP controls a significant portion of territory and even has the capacity to provide housing for displaced people. He rejected the Pakistani government’s claim that TTP fighters enter from Afghan soil, emphasizing that the group holds its own territory inside Pakistan and has no connection with the Afghan government. In conclusion, he said that TTP’s territory continues to expand day by day, warning the people of Pakistan that “Pakistan will soon be conquered.”

🚨 In a newly released video message, the spokesperson of Tehreek-e-Taliban #Pakistan (#TTP) in Orakzai stated that the group maintains an active presence and positions in its own areas. Orakzai KP 📍 He claimed that behind their forces, there used to be Pakistani military posts which now no longer exist. The spokesperson added that TTP controls a significant portion of territory and even has the capacity to provide housing for displaced people. He rejected the Pakistani government’s claim that TTP fighters enter from Afghan soil, emphasizing that the group holds its own territory inside Pakistan and has no connection with the Afghan government. In conclusion, he said that TTP’s territory continues to expand day by day, warning the people of Pakistan that “Pakistan will soon be conquered.”

Najib - نجیب

54,260 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Exclusive Documentary! An Uproar Born of Oppression! When was the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) formed, and what were the core political and social factors that contributed to its emergence? Since 2007, what major attacks and operations has the TTP carried out against military targets inside Pakistan? Why did the agreements between the TTP and the Pakistani military regime fail to hold? What major military operations has the Pakistani military regime launched against the TTP? Is a specific faction within the military regime responsible for the repeated collapse of negotiations with the TTP? These and similar questions are answered in this exclusive documentary. #میثاق

Exclusive Documentary! An Uproar Born of Oppression! When was the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) formed, and what were the core political and social factors that contributed to its emergence? Since 2007, what major attacks and operations has the TTP carried out against military targets inside Pakistan? Why did the agreements between the TTP and the Pakistani military regime fail to hold? What major military operations has the Pakistani military regime launched against the TTP? Is a specific faction within the military regime responsible for the repeated collapse of negotiations with the TTP? These and similar questions are answered in this exclusive documentary. #میثاق

میثاق | Misaq

77,690 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

#BREAKING: India hits out at Pakistan over Trump’s remarks on Pakistan’s secret Nuclear tests. India’s MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal: “Clandestine and illegal nuclear activities are in keeping with Pakistan’s history, that is centered around decades of smuggling, export control violations, secret partnerships, AQ Khan network and further proliferation. India has always drawn the attention of the international community to these aspects of Pakistan’s record. In this backdrop, we have taken note of President Trump’s comment about Pakistan’s nuclear testing.” - Randhir Jaiswal

#BREAKING: India hits out at Pakistan over Trump’s remarks on Pakistan’s secret Nuclear tests. India’s MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal: “Clandestine and illegal nuclear activities are in keeping with Pakistan’s history, that is centered around decades of smuggling, export control violations, secret partnerships, AQ Khan network and further proliferation. India has always drawn the attention of the international community to these aspects of Pakistan’s record. In this backdrop, we have taken note of President Trump’s comment about Pakistan’s nuclear testing.” - Randhir Jaiswal

Aditya Raj Kaul

360,750 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Lukashenko on nuclear weapons: If we approach the matter from the standpoint of fairness, does the United States of America possess nuclear weapons? Yes, it does. Okay, the United States is the pioneer of nuclear weapons and has held them for a long time. But Israel remains quiet about the fact that it has nuclear weapons. The Iranians could ask, “Why can’t we have nuclear weapons?” Especially when nearby India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Why can’t Iran have nuclear weapons? If we want fairness, let us gradually, step by step, eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent, a guarantee that no one will ever attack you, then Iran has the right, like other nations, to possess nuclear weapons for its own defense.

Lukashenko on nuclear weapons: If we approach the matter from the standpoint of fairness, does the United States of America possess nuclear weapons? Yes, it does. Okay, the United States is the pioneer of nuclear weapons and has held them for a long time. But Israel remains quiet about the fact that it has nuclear weapons. The Iranians could ask, “Why can’t we have nuclear weapons?” Especially when nearby India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Why can’t Iran have nuclear weapons? If we want fairness, let us gradually, step by step, eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent, a guarantee that no one will ever attack you, then Iran has the right, like other nations, to possess nuclear weapons for its own defense.

Clash Report

46,958 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 So according to Zabihullah Mujahid and his people TTP isn’t a terrorist group because Pashto has no word for ‘terrorist,’ and the issue is purely Pakistan’s internal matter which is pure bullshit because if TTP is our “internal” issue then why are its leaders, camps and fighters sitting inside Afghanistan? An internal problem becomes a transnational security threat when the neighboring state refuses to take action against the groups using its soil. An internal problem does not require foreign launching pads. No country has the right to host groups attacking its neighbor and then call it an internal matter. And whether Pashto has a word for “terrorist” or not the world and UN calls TTP terrorists because they kill civilians. Pakistan sheltered 4 million Afghans, yet Afghanistan can’t stop TTP using its soil against us. Cross-border attacks are external aggression, not internal issues.

🚨 So according to Zabihullah Mujahid and his people TTP isn’t a terrorist group because Pashto has no word for ‘terrorist,’ and the issue is purely Pakistan’s internal matter which is pure bullshit because if TTP is our “internal” issue then why are its leaders, camps and fighters sitting inside Afghanistan? An internal problem becomes a transnational security threat when the neighboring state refuses to take action against the groups using its soil. An internal problem does not require foreign launching pads. No country has the right to host groups attacking its neighbor and then call it an internal matter. And whether Pashto has a word for “terrorist” or not the world and UN calls TTP terrorists because they kill civilians. Pakistan sheltered 4 million Afghans, yet Afghanistan can’t stop TTP using its soil against us. Cross-border attacks are external aggression, not internal issues.

Hafsah Malik

15,204 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Having nuclear weapons is one thing. Surviving a nuclear attack and still being able to strike back is what defines a true nuclear superpower. Reports claim Pakistan asked China in 2024 for help building a sea-based nuclear deterrent, the most survivable form of nuclear capability. According to reports, China rejected Pakistan’s request and called the demand “unreasonable.” Today, only a handful of countries possess an operational sea-based nuclear deterrent: the United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, and India. India achieved this capability through its Arihant-class submarine programme, completing its nuclear triad with land, air, and sea-based nuclear forces. Pakistan’s reported push highlights how modern nuclear competition is no longer just about missiles on land — it is increasingly about what survives beneath the ocean. #China #Nuclear #submarine #Pakistan #indianarmy #NuclearSubmarine

Having nuclear weapons is one thing. Surviving a nuclear attack and still being able to strike back is what defines a true nuclear superpower. Reports claim Pakistan asked China in 2024 for help building a sea-based nuclear deterrent, the most survivable form of nuclear capability. According to reports, China rejected Pakistan’s request and called the demand “unreasonable.” Today, only a handful of countries possess an operational sea-based nuclear deterrent: the United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, and India. India achieved this capability through its Arihant-class submarine programme, completing its nuclear triad with land, air, and sea-based nuclear forces. Pakistan’s reported push highlights how modern nuclear competition is no longer just about missiles on land — it is increasingly about what survives beneath the ocean. #China #Nuclear #submarine #Pakistan #indianarmy #NuclearSubmarine

Srijan Pal Singh

13,047 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Children in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have acted as members of the TTP and released a message in this video. They say that the #TTP leadership is on its own soil, and that the Pakistani regime makes false claims that they are based in #Afghanistan. They also say that the #Pakistan regime bombs our women and children, and that we will take our revenge. 🎥 Khalid Kheybari - KP 📍

Children in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have acted as members of the TTP and released a message in this video. They say that the #TTP leadership is on its own soil, and that the Pakistani regime makes false claims that they are based in #Afghanistan. They also say that the #Pakistan regime bombs our women and children, and that we will take our revenge. 🎥 Khalid Kheybari - KP 📍

Najib Farhodi

14,352 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Siddhant Nagrath’s core line in that Oxford Union “India vs Pakistan” debate is that Pakistan’s structure and incentives make sustained hostility and even war with India politically and economically attractive for those who hold power there, and that this is stabilised not restrained by its nuclear posture. Nagrath argues that for 77 years Pakistan’s ruling establishment has had strong incentives to maintain confrontation with India, including the possibility of military action. He contends that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons do not create responsible restraint but instead enable aggressive behaviour under a protective umbrella. He claims it is “politically infeasible” and “economically infeasible” for those who hold the money, power, and politics in Pakistan to avoid war, because conflict sustains their position. According to him, when there is Indo‑Pak conflict, it is not Indian leaders like Narendra Modi whose electoral prospects improve most, but Pakistan’s power brokers, who gain legitimacy and resources from crisis. Terrorism and security argument Nagrath asserts that Pakistan has systematically given terrorists a home, weapons, training, military aid, intelligence support, and guidance on where and how to strike India. On this basis, he argues India faces a security environment in which Pakistan-backed terrorism and the threat of escalation are entrenched tools of state policy rather than aberrations. Rebuttal to “nuclear stabiliser” claim Responding to the proposition’s portrayal of Pakistan as a “great nuclear” stabilising power, he suggests nuclear capability has not translated into responsible de‑escalation. Instead, he frames Pakistan’s nuclear status as part of a bargaining strategy that allows it to internationalise crises and shield itself while continuing support to terror networks. Debate Context The event occurred amid prior Oxford Union controversies, including a collapsed India-Pakistan debate where Nagrath and peers like Viraansh Bhanushali participated after Indian leaders withdrew. Nagrath has debated Kashmir issues before, opposing independence motions. The video has garnered views on the Oxford Union channel, reflecting interest in India-Pakistan geopolitical discourse. Credit : Oxford Union.

Siddhant Nagrath’s core line in that Oxford Union “India vs Pakistan” debate is that Pakistan’s structure and incentives make sustained hostility and even war with India politically and economically attractive for those who hold power there, and that this is stabilised not restrained by its nuclear posture. Nagrath argues that for 77 years Pakistan’s ruling establishment has had strong incentives to maintain confrontation with India, including the possibility of military action. He contends that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons do not create responsible restraint but instead enable aggressive behaviour under a protective umbrella. He claims it is “politically infeasible” and “economically infeasible” for those who hold the money, power, and politics in Pakistan to avoid war, because conflict sustains their position. According to him, when there is Indo‑Pak conflict, it is not Indian leaders like Narendra Modi whose electoral prospects improve most, but Pakistan’s power brokers, who gain legitimacy and resources from crisis. Terrorism and security argument Nagrath asserts that Pakistan has systematically given terrorists a home, weapons, training, military aid, intelligence support, and guidance on where and how to strike India. On this basis, he argues India faces a security environment in which Pakistan-backed terrorism and the threat of escalation are entrenched tools of state policy rather than aberrations. Rebuttal to “nuclear stabiliser” claim Responding to the proposition’s portrayal of Pakistan as a “great nuclear” stabilising power, he suggests nuclear capability has not translated into responsible de‑escalation. Instead, he frames Pakistan’s nuclear status as part of a bargaining strategy that allows it to internationalise crises and shield itself while continuing support to terror networks. Debate Context The event occurred amid prior Oxford Union controversies, including a collapsed India-Pakistan debate where Nagrath and peers like Viraansh Bhanushali participated after Indian leaders withdrew. Nagrath has debated Kashmir issues before, opposing independence motions. The video has garnered views on the Oxford Union channel, reflecting interest in India-Pakistan geopolitical discourse. Credit : Oxford Union.

Augadh

23,879 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The presence of the Afghan Taliban in Bajaur province, Pakistan to help the TTP against the Pakistan state, is a blatant act of aggression against Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. The people of Afghanistan categorically reject aggression toward any of our neighbors. Yet, this terrorist regime, hiding under the name of Afghanistan, exploits Afghan soil to wage war against neighboring states, supports anti-neighboring elements and even threatens global stability. Pakistan must not treat such aggression as normal or show weakness in the face of these terrorists group. Imran Khan's reliance on dialogue with such groups has achieved nothing except elevating the aggressor of the Afghan Taliban regime against Pakistan soil and the status of the TTP. #Pakistan #Afghanistan #TTP

The presence of the Afghan Taliban in Bajaur province, Pakistan to help the TTP against the Pakistan state, is a blatant act of aggression against Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. The people of Afghanistan categorically reject aggression toward any of our neighbors. Yet, this terrorist regime, hiding under the name of Afghanistan, exploits Afghan soil to wage war against neighboring states, supports anti-neighboring elements and even threatens global stability. Pakistan must not treat such aggression as normal or show weakness in the face of these terrorists group. Imran Khan's reliance on dialogue with such groups has achieved nothing except elevating the aggressor of the Afghan Taliban regime against Pakistan soil and the status of the TTP. #Pakistan #Afghanistan #TTP

Ahmad Sharifzad

46,476 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Russia demonstrates its nuclear weapons in Belarus The Russian Ministry of Defense has released video footage showing the delivery of nuclear warheads to field sites of a missile brigade in Belarus during ongoing nuclear drills. Moscow states that Russian nuclear weapons have now been deployed on Belarusian territory. The exercises involve over 64,000 troops and more than 7,800 pieces of military equipment, including around 200 missile launchers. Russia currently has 320 launchers in total.

Russia demonstrates its nuclear weapons in Belarus The Russian Ministry of Defense has released video footage showing the delivery of nuclear warheads to field sites of a missile brigade in Belarus during ongoing nuclear drills. Moscow states that Russian nuclear weapons have now been deployed on Belarusian territory. The exercises involve over 64,000 troops and more than 7,800 pieces of military equipment, including around 200 missile launchers. Russia currently has 320 launchers in total.

Visegrád 24

38,632 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Pakistan’s journey to the bomb was Machiavellian, by necessity, not choice. Surrounded by existential threats and denied every avenue of peaceful nuclear cooperation, Pakistan did what every nuclear power has done: it exploited gaps, leveraged networks, and outmaneuvered a discriminatory regime. Let’s be clear: no nuclear program in the world is fully indigenous. Every nuclear state built its deterrent with some form of external help, covert assistance, or overlooked violations. Pakistan’s sin was not proliferation, it was succeeding outside the sanctioned club. We should never be apologetic about the decisions that safeguarded our sovereignty. In a world where might makes right, Pakistan simply refused to be left vulnerable. That is survival. #YomeTakbeer

Pakistan’s journey to the bomb was Machiavellian, by necessity, not choice. Surrounded by existential threats and denied every avenue of peaceful nuclear cooperation, Pakistan did what every nuclear power has done: it exploited gaps, leveraged networks, and outmaneuvered a discriminatory regime. Let’s be clear: no nuclear program in the world is fully indigenous. Every nuclear state built its deterrent with some form of external help, covert assistance, or overlooked violations. Pakistan’s sin was not proliferation, it was succeeding outside the sanctioned club. We should never be apologetic about the decisions that safeguarded our sovereignty. In a world where might makes right, Pakistan simply refused to be left vulnerable. That is survival. #YomeTakbeer

Rabia Akhtar

45,136 просмотров • 1 год назад

This is how the US uses nuclear weapons as an excuse to attack anyone they wish. They attacked Iran over nukes. But stayed silent when the dictatorial regime of North Korea built them, or when the jihadi regime of Pakistan built them. They no longer attack these nations, or any nuclear-armed nation. India remains the only country in the world to strike military bases of a nuclear-armed country during Operation Sindoor.

This is how the US uses nuclear weapons as an excuse to attack anyone they wish. They attacked Iran over nukes. But stayed silent when the dictatorial regime of North Korea built them, or when the jihadi regime of Pakistan built them. They no longer attack these nations, or any nuclear-armed nation. India remains the only country in the world to strike military bases of a nuclear-armed country during Operation Sindoor.

BALA

14,106 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Breaking News, #BalochistanBriefing, Monitoring Desk 20 August, 2026 Videos and images coming from the Republic of Balochistan's Pashin district where Baloch army took over the one of key police stations of Pashin district. Locals say that Saranan police station has fallen to Baloch fighters. The fighters reportedly seized the weapons inside the station before destroying the building. Large numbers of local residents reportedly gathered in the main city to witness the unfolding events, while Pakistani security forces were unable to prevent the police station from being overrun. The developments point to a growing challenge to Pakistan’s illegal presence across Balochistan, with reports that increasing numbers of local people are joining Baloch fighters and advancing against police and military checkpoints. If these developments continue, Pakistan’s invading forces and illegal administrative presence across Balochistan could face an increasingly serious collapse in the months ahead.

Breaking News, #BalochistanBriefing, Monitoring Desk 20 August, 2026 Videos and images coming from the Republic of Balochistan's Pashin district where Baloch army took over the one of key police stations of Pashin district. Locals say that Saranan police station has fallen to Baloch fighters. The fighters reportedly seized the weapons inside the station before destroying the building. Large numbers of local residents reportedly gathered in the main city to witness the unfolding events, while Pakistani security forces were unable to prevent the police station from being overrun. The developments point to a growing challenge to Pakistan’s illegal presence across Balochistan, with reports that increasing numbers of local people are joining Baloch fighters and advancing against police and military checkpoints. If these developments continue, Pakistan’s invading forces and illegal administrative presence across Balochistan could face an increasingly serious collapse in the months ahead.

Mir Yar Baloch

35,673 просмотров • 4 дней назад

❗️Attention, Estonia! Peskov says Russia might aim its nuclear weapons at Estonia. We are not threatening anyone, he says. "Foreign Minister of Estonia doesn't exclude nuclear weapons being based in Estonia in case NATO decides to do that. And we know where Estonia is from us. Estonia is right near us. We are not threatening Estonia, like the rest of the European countries. But if there are nuclear weapons aimed at us on the territory of Estonia, then our nuclear weapons will be aimed at the territory of Estonia. And Estonia must understand this clearly."

❗️Attention, Estonia! Peskov says Russia might aim its nuclear weapons at Estonia. We are not threatening anyone, he says. "Foreign Minister of Estonia doesn't exclude nuclear weapons being based in Estonia in case NATO decides to do that. And we know where Estonia is from us. Estonia is right near us. We are not threatening Estonia, like the rest of the European countries. But if there are nuclear weapons aimed at us on the territory of Estonia, then our nuclear weapons will be aimed at the territory of Estonia. And Estonia must understand this clearly."

Anton Gerashchenko

60,502 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The Republic of Balochistan will not permit its rare earth minerals to be exploited by Pakistan for purposes that undermine global peace and stability 13 August, 2025 The President of the United States of America Donald J. Trump administration in a strategic blunder unfortunately has assured Pakistan access to Balochistan’s vast and untapped mineral wealth. Within just 48 hours of this assurance, Pakistan’s Army Chief Asim Maulana Munir brazenly threatened to “bring down half the world with nuclear weapons” and vowed to destroy major dams inside India’s sovereign territory. After him, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto, and puppet Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif amplified this reckless and dangerous rhetoric. The world, particularly the United States, made a grave mistake in the past by overlooking Pakistan’s access to nuclear weapons, which today have become a serious threat and liability to peace across the entire region. Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is now being recklessly brandished; its Prime Minister repeatedly advocates for #Iran to acquire nuclear weapons, the same Iran that openly threatens to wipe America’s ally #Israel off the map, while Pakistan’s Army Chief has spoken of dragging “half the world down” in nuclear destruction. If now, under President Trump’s leadership United States grants Pakistan access to Balochistan’s vast mineral resources for its narrow interests, it would be akin to handing a loaded gun or a razor to a monkey, a reckless act that could bring devastation not only upon Pakistan itself but also upon the rest of the world, a danger that Army Chief Asim Munir has already signaled. If such extremists are allowed to seize illegal control of Balochistan’s oil, gas, uranium, gold, silver, copper, and other rare earth resources worth trillions of dollars, the scale of their terrorism will reach unprecedented, catastrophic proportions, threatening not only South Asia, but the stability of the entire planet. The world is now confronting an unavoidable reality: trading with Pakistan, arming its terrorist military, or partnering with it in any form is not mere recklessness, it is an act of global self-destruction, gamble with global security, jeopardizing the safety and security of all humankind. Being a responsible country the Republic Of Balochistan remains steadfast in its commitment to regional peace, stability, and prosperity. Its people will never allow their rare earth resources to be plundered by Pakistan’s radical army to finance nuclear blackmail, orchestrate another 9/11-style attack, or continue sheltering international terrorist networks such as ISIS and Al-Qaeda sleeper cells located deep inside Pakistan's Punjab province. We call upon global powers to act decisively, working in unity to dismantle Pakistan’s double game and shut down the terror factories run by its notorious ISI and its network of paid extremist proxies. The cost of inaction will be measured in global insecurity and the lives of countless innocents. #BalochistanIsNotPakistan Hyrbyair Marri Secretary Marco Rubio Department of State Zalmay Khalilzad Lindsey Graham

The Republic of Balochistan will not permit its rare earth minerals to be exploited by Pakistan for purposes that undermine global peace and stability 13 August, 2025 The President of the United States of America Donald J. Trump administration in a strategic blunder unfortunately has assured Pakistan access to Balochistan’s vast and untapped mineral wealth. Within just 48 hours of this assurance, Pakistan’s Army Chief Asim Maulana Munir brazenly threatened to “bring down half the world with nuclear weapons” and vowed to destroy major dams inside India’s sovereign territory. After him, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto, and puppet Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif amplified this reckless and dangerous rhetoric. The world, particularly the United States, made a grave mistake in the past by overlooking Pakistan’s access to nuclear weapons, which today have become a serious threat and liability to peace across the entire region. Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is now being recklessly brandished; its Prime Minister repeatedly advocates for #Iran to acquire nuclear weapons, the same Iran that openly threatens to wipe America’s ally #Israel off the map, while Pakistan’s Army Chief has spoken of dragging “half the world down” in nuclear destruction. If now, under President Trump’s leadership United States grants Pakistan access to Balochistan’s vast mineral resources for its narrow interests, it would be akin to handing a loaded gun or a razor to a monkey, a reckless act that could bring devastation not only upon Pakistan itself but also upon the rest of the world, a danger that Army Chief Asim Munir has already signaled. If such extremists are allowed to seize illegal control of Balochistan’s oil, gas, uranium, gold, silver, copper, and other rare earth resources worth trillions of dollars, the scale of their terrorism will reach unprecedented, catastrophic proportions, threatening not only South Asia, but the stability of the entire planet. The world is now confronting an unavoidable reality: trading with Pakistan, arming its terrorist military, or partnering with it in any form is not mere recklessness, it is an act of global self-destruction, gamble with global security, jeopardizing the safety and security of all humankind. Being a responsible country the Republic Of Balochistan remains steadfast in its commitment to regional peace, stability, and prosperity. Its people will never allow their rare earth resources to be plundered by Pakistan’s radical army to finance nuclear blackmail, orchestrate another 9/11-style attack, or continue sheltering international terrorist networks such as ISIS and Al-Qaeda sleeper cells located deep inside Pakistan's Punjab province. We call upon global powers to act decisively, working in unity to dismantle Pakistan’s double game and shut down the terror factories run by its notorious ISI and its network of paid extremist proxies. The cost of inaction will be measured in global insecurity and the lives of countless innocents. #BalochistanIsNotPakistan Hyrbyair Marri Secretary Marco Rubio Department of State Zalmay Khalilzad Lindsey Graham

Mir Yar Baloch

23,030 просмотров • 1 год назад