Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Pete Buttigieg hit this key question: "How did the information move from a classified system to an unclassified system?" "Somebody moved it. And that somebody would appear to be Secretary Hegseth. He needs to explain how he did that and why."

410,746 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

8 Kommentare

Profilbild von Nerdy Pursuit 🐉
Nerdy Pursuit 🐉vor 1 Jahr

I know the Trump administration just wants everyone to forget this. But they still haven't answered very basic questions about what happened. And several people in the Signal chat were traveling overseas at the time - including in Russia. So this is not a trivial matter.

Profilbild von UNIFYD
UNIFYDvor 1 Jahr

A thought-provoking trilogy on The Kennedy Files. This 3-part series exposes declassified information on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, unraveling the complex web of evidence surrounding that fateful day in 1963.

Profilbild von Bobius Prime 👮🏻🍑 🇺🇸
Bobius Prime 👮🏻🍑 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

Damn. Still trying to polish that into a story. LOL

Profilbild von Independent 🇨🇦
Independent 🇨🇦vor 1 Jahr

The guy who took months to visit East Palestine when Secretary of Transportation has very little credibility when talking about accountability.

Profilbild von Eric B. Schorvitz
Eric B. Schorvitzvor 1 Jahr

The key question is: When did Goldberg transition from being accidentally invited to being a spy committing a crime?

Profilbild von David H
David Hvor 1 Jahr

I heard the lady who runs NPR, which just got defunded for being so leftist, owns the company that built the app they used. Fire her, and it's all good, just use a different app. Which I am sure they will.

Profilbild von chyea ok
chyea okvor 1 Jahr

Wow the verified Twitter accounts are really trying hard to push the “nothing to see here” angle

Profilbild von Dees Bees
Dees Beesvor 1 Jahr

there's never accountability in the tRump administration.

Ähnliche Videos

“Why does Prime Minister Keir Starmer appear to be so hesitant to go against the wishes of sexual predators? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to prosecute Britain's most notorious pedophile, Sir Jimmy Savile? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to prosecute the key 'grooming' gang underage rape scandal in Rotherham? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to say 'no' to Lord Mandelson, a key Epstein friend who was leaking private government information to Epstein? What is it with Keir Starmer and cases involving sexual predation and sexual exploitation and underage rape? Why does he appear impotent to do anything about them? We've seen a pattern developing and that pattern to our logical minds can only be explained by the fact that it could well be highly likely that they've got something on Keir Starmer too. This man needs to resign. That is the only option. He must go. He must. And by the way, that doesn't mean there'll be a general election because it may well be the Labour gets rid of him and brings in another one of their own. But nevertheless, that means Labour goes into the May elections under a new leader, and that means the issue is kept alive because the public, we are sure, will be rightfully outraged at these revelations, and will demand that all of the Labour leadership is held to account for these shenanigans. So the fact that Keir Starmer is still in position is unsustainable. It can no longer be tolerated.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

35,098 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten