Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Pete Buttigieg hit this key question: "How did the information move from a classified system to an unclassified system?" "Somebody moved it. And that somebody would appear to be Secretary Hegseth. He needs to explain how he did that and why."

410,746 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

8 Yorum

Nerdy Pursuit 🐉 profil fotoğrafı
Nerdy Pursuit 🐉1 yıl önce

I know the Trump administration just wants everyone to forget this. But they still haven't answered very basic questions about what happened. And several people in the Signal chat were traveling overseas at the time - including in Russia. So this is not a trivial matter.

UNIFYD profil fotoğrafı
UNIFYD1 yıl önce

A thought-provoking trilogy on The Kennedy Files. This 3-part series exposes declassified information on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, unraveling the complex web of evidence surrounding that fateful day in 1963.

Bobius Prime 👮🏻🍑 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Bobius Prime 👮🏻🍑 🇺🇸1 yıl önce

Damn. Still trying to polish that into a story. LOL

Independent 🇨🇦 profil fotoğrafı
Independent 🇨🇦1 yıl önce

The guy who took months to visit East Palestine when Secretary of Transportation has very little credibility when talking about accountability.

Eric B. Schorvitz profil fotoğrafı
Eric B. Schorvitz1 yıl önce

The key question is: When did Goldberg transition from being accidentally invited to being a spy committing a crime?

David H profil fotoğrafı
David H1 yıl önce

I heard the lady who runs NPR, which just got defunded for being so leftist, owns the company that built the app they used. Fire her, and it's all good, just use a different app. Which I am sure they will.

chyea ok profil fotoğrafı
chyea ok1 yıl önce

Wow the verified Twitter accounts are really trying hard to push the “nothing to see here” angle

Dees Bees profil fotoğrafı
Dees Bees1 yıl önce

there's never accountability in the tRump administration.

Benzer Videolar

“Why does Prime Minister Keir Starmer appear to be so hesitant to go against the wishes of sexual predators? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to prosecute Britain's most notorious pedophile, Sir Jimmy Savile? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to prosecute the key 'grooming' gang underage rape scandal in Rotherham? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to say 'no' to Lord Mandelson, a key Epstein friend who was leaking private government information to Epstein? What is it with Keir Starmer and cases involving sexual predation and sexual exploitation and underage rape? Why does he appear impotent to do anything about them? We've seen a pattern developing and that pattern to our logical minds can only be explained by the fact that it could well be highly likely that they've got something on Keir Starmer too. This man needs to resign. That is the only option. He must go. He must. And by the way, that doesn't mean there'll be a general election because it may well be the Labour gets rid of him and brings in another one of their own. But nevertheless, that means Labour goes into the May elections under a new leader, and that means the issue is kept alive because the public, we are sure, will be rightfully outraged at these revelations, and will demand that all of the Labour leadership is held to account for these shenanigans. So the fact that Keir Starmer is still in position is unsustainable. It can no longer be tolerated.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

35,098 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce