Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Peter Dutton was asked TWO questions about ANOTHER candidate in controversy for literally breaking the law. Dutton’s response? 1. “What about Labor”, bringing a Labor candidate from the 2022 election. 2. “But the Greens” Swipe for the video. Truly pathetic.

13,253 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Bird Brain
Bird Brain1 год назад

@RichmdSewerRat Hopefully, this is only the start of Dutton's goose being cooked to a crisp.

Фото профиля eLaw ©️🇦🇺🇧🇪
eLaw ©️🇦🇺🇧🇪1 год назад

This is how LNP know how to deflect their responses! It’s systemic. Look at sussssan ley’s laugh at Dutton deflection!

Фото профиля Estadio Deportes
Estadio Deportes1 год назад

#ExtraCancha ¿CÓMO NO LO HABÍA PENSADO ANTES? 😅 León Larregui encontró una peculiar solución para contrarrestar las medidas de Donald Trump. 🤭¿Será lo que México necesita? 👀 Entérate de su controversial propuesta. #LeónLarregui #Zoé #Trump

Фото профиля Christofer Plumber
Christofer Plumber1 год назад

Here’s a question for the next press conference: ”Mr. Dutton, what is it about the question you are uncomfortable with? Your response indicates you either misunderstood the question, or you are deliberately being evasive. Which is it?

Фото профиля WhiskyTango
WhiskyTango1 год назад

Labor $1.30.......Coalition $3.52...Sportsbet

Фото профиля WhiskyTango
WhiskyTango1 год назад

Typical conservative hypocrites

Фото профиля Belverdear - @belverdear.bsky.social
Belverdear - @belverdear.bsky.social1 год назад

Dutton is pathetic!

Фото профиля Adrian
Adrian1 год назад

Dutton “I’m caught” ooh look over there Labor blah, blah, blah! He’s a fraud of the grandest scale! #DudDutton

Фото профиля Nicky aka Ronki3847
Nicky aka Ronki38471 год назад

Is it my imagination or are some Journos now asking more probing questions of Temu Trump?

Фото профиля Beckalina Bits
Beckalina Bits1 год назад

He’s got nothing

Фото профиля Rose67 🇺🇦🇵🇸
Rose67 🇺🇦🇵🇸1 год назад

He’s not even trying to win this election.

Похожие видео

#ABC's 7.30's #SarahFerguson just ran a textbook case of LNP-friendly media spin. Here’s how she turned Peter Dutton’s questionable banking trades into a hit job on Labor instead. Here's how she turned 'journalism' into a pile of shite: Overall Analysis of Bias & Framing 1. The Contradiction on Who Broke the Story Ferguson opens the segment stating that News Corp broke the story, yet spends the majority of the interview pushing the idea that Labor sat on it and released it for political damage. This contradiction is deliberate, as she is smart enough to know that if News Corp broke it, then Labor couldn’t have “timed” its release. 2. Constant Deflection from Dutton’s Ethics to Labor’s Timing Instead of holding Dutton accountable for his conduct, Ferguson’s line of questioning is mostly about Labor’s role in handling the information. She never presses Dutton for direct answers, but harps on Charlton to justify Labor’s actions. 3. Repeatedly Reinforcing LNP’s “Dirt Unit” Narrative She repeatedly asks whether this was a Labor-led hit job, effectively legitimising the opposition’s counter-narrative. Instead of scrutinising Dutton’s actions, she tries to paint the government as manipulative. 4. False Premises in Gotcha Questions Ferguson frames her questions as though Labor should have instantly released the information, which ignores due diligence, media processes, and logical timing. She suggests that Labor somehow orchestrated this, despite admitting earlier that a News Corp journalist uncovered it. 5. Softballing Dutton by Inserting His Defence for Him She downplays the ethical issue, asking whether Dutton was simply an “astute investor” (00:01:57). She questions whether he even knew about the bailout, despite the high likelihood that he did. Conclusion: A Classic Case of Media Bias Favouring the LNP Ferguson’s entire approach shifts scrutiny away from Dutton and onto Labor, legitimising LNP spin. Instead of focusing on Dutton's ethically dubious stock trades, she portrays Labor as the manipulative party. She engages in classic “both-sides” false equivalence, equating actual wrongdoing (Dutton’s trading) with a fabricated issue (Labor’s handling of the information). The core contradiction—acknowledging that News Corp broke the story but still blaming Labor for “timing” it—is the most egregious and deliberate aspect of her bias. Final Take This interview wasn’t about investigating Dutton—it was about giving him an escape route while manufacturing a scandal for Labor. It was biased, misleading, and a textbook example of ABC running LNP-friendly narratives under the guise of scrutiny. #InsiderTrading Full clip (interview) in thread.

The Noisy Elephant

18,164 просмотров • 1 год назад