Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Peter MacKay: "Upping the ante with retaliatory tariffs, sure, it feels good right now. It feels good with a lot of the elbows-up rhetoric, but it hasn't worked." (pretty notable who keeps coming out against retaliating...)
76,330 views • 27 days ago •via X (Twitter)
35 Comments

Imagine arguing against retaliatory tariffs with this behind you:

Canadians pushing back, boycotting and retaliating absolutely has had an impact. The liquor, deals with Europe and Asia, boycotting travel to the US, and now tariffs. It is clear that they were surprised how united Canadians were in these efforts.

@PeterMacKay wants to destroy Canada like he destroyed the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada.

Seeing this reminds me: this country needs more top-notch pundits – and not the same usual suspects over and over again.

Just a reminder to the Conservatives criticising retaliatory tariffs...it is literally what you voted for in the last election campaign...

I will not take advice on deal making from the person who destroyed the PC’s by making a deal with the Reform Party. He was the architect of the reason the current Conservative Party is in the mess it is today.

There’s reading the room, and then there’s this

Hey Pete, you’re irrelevant now

Another sniveling coward... the world is littered with these people. How much are the Americans paying Peter ???

Pretty funny how the conservatives ran on responding with retaliatory tariffs and now they change their tune.

Peter MacKay, I hated him then & all these years later, nothing has changed

Did your party change their minds?

Yeah let’s not retaliate and allow Trump to have his cake and eat it too! Why would he stop tariffing us if there is no downside for him? Insane.

@OrbitStudios Why? Why is this guy given a platform?

@PeterMacKay is a part of the reason why the Conservatives are where they are now. It all stems back to Harper's dumb Reform Party with losers Mackay and Poilievre. @ClaudeLavigne12 @CPC_HQ @SarahFischer__ @kim_gaetz @winter_canada @harryt59_harry @blynne43 @howllr @bethanybelton

If these people love trump and America so much why don't they just get out of our Country.

Sorry Peter, I couldn’t hear what you were saying over that toucan beak on your face

So, Petey would've preferred Carney surrender. Once a Con...

@MountainDreami2 Peter McKay - you’re only as good as your greatest blunder. How’s the offspring of the Reform Party and the Progressive Conservatives doing these days.

The guy who was part of the govt that decided FIPA was an acceptable deal as long as Canadians weren't aware of being sold out now has reservations about walking away from a bad deal when you can't get what you ask for. What a shocker.

29% isn't low enough, Peter? Wanna see if you can drive the whole party down to Poilievre's 18%?

Says it all they would have sold our sovereignty in a heart beat. CONServatives are over & will never form government as Canadians see their objective was the 51st state. Notice they would be Ok as they are wealthy & would not need universal Healthcare or social programs.

Who is still listening to MacKay?

I can’t stand this asshole.

Sure is notable. This is the crowd that made the 1993 NAFTA deal that ultimately made Canada a subsidiary of the US so we could get cheaper detergent. They traded sovereignty for lower cost detergent. So maybe they should shut up and take a fucking seat.

Weird for Mackay who has a campaign poster of John A Macdonald on his wall Macdonald's National Policy advocated very strongly for tarrifs on the USA) to be opposing tariffs on the USA.

Rolling out Peter effing MacKay might be even worse than rolling out Stockwell JetSki Day. At least we all knew JetSki was a buffoon from the start. There’s probably still some who think Pete is still legit when he has clearly lost his mind

Conservative Fascists

You have to remember that it was Peter MacKay, who broke the rules surrounding the merger with the reform party that allowed for a reformer to become leader and then replace the majority of the oc parties leadership team with former reformers by 2010, to take control of the party
Wasn't $ for $ tariffs part of the Con platform 1 year ago?

Conservatives would rather us take a loss to help tone down the temperature in our trade talks with the US without considering that Trump always changes the rules. They would rather us take a submissive position with the bully.

Disgusting. People need to stop seeing this just as a trade and as a take over.

He's a con. Don't even listen.

McKay smells blood in the water. He wants to replace PP.

Hmmmm… wasn’t it part of the CON election platform?

