正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Peter Obi’s first test as governor was not a big project. It was letterheaded paper. They brought a quote: ₦60,000. He did not stamp it. He did not “just approve.” He took the same request to another printer and confirmed the real price. That is the whole philosophy in... show more

Peter Obi Grassroots Commentary

528,124 subscribers

24,145 次观看 • 13 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 条评论

George 的头像

George12 天前

Peter Obi is coming

ndukwemeruwa 的头像

ndukwemeruwa12 天前

Peter Obi will not sign a budget that has billions allocated to fake agencies and that is one thing peter Obi will do differently

big_george 的头像

big_george12 天前

Buhari promised to end corruption but he failed woefully, and mr failure took over. But PO can do it because he has done it before.

CHIDIMMA ⭐️🌟 的头像

CHIDIMMA ⭐️🌟13 天前

Man of integrity

Julius Eja 的头像

Julius Eja12 天前

Imagine how much u can possibly save

Emmanuel Ajiboye 的头像

Emmanuel Ajiboye12 天前

When a chief executive is forced to execute operational tasks personally, it signals a fundamental failure in delegation and organizational management. All this hype will cause him to lose the election. Mark my words

W - Likes 的头像

W - Likes12 天前

very Un Presidential

Darknface E 的头像

Darknface E12 天前

All these bobo have been bursted. Abeg

Salim Nura 的头像

Salim Nura12 天前

Nigerian Most be OK

相关视频

He listened to all of Beyoncé’s albums for the first time and was gagged! “Not one album feels the same way as the other… she is unlike other big artists who find a formula that works and makes money for them and stick with it.. not Beyoncé”

He listened to all of Beyoncé’s albums for the first time and was gagged! “Not one album feels the same way as the other… she is unlike other big artists who find a formula that works and makes money for them and stick with it.. not Beyoncé”

IChooseViolence

104,844 次观看 • 6 个月前

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.

Stefan.

210,938 次观看 • 1 个月前

Nigerians do not love home. That is the honest truth. They talk about Nigeria with pride, but they will not live there. They will not fight for it. They will not build it. They love the flag, but they flee the soil. This is a big problem not just for Nigeria, but for everywhere they go. They bring their dysfunction, their entitlement, and their refusal to take responsibility. South Africa, the UK, the US, Canada, everywhere Nigerians go, they bring the same chaos they are running from. It is time to be honest. Nigerians need to love home enough to stay, to fight, and to build. Until then, they will remain a problem not just for themselves, but for the whole world. 🇿🇦✊🏾

Nigerians do not love home. That is the honest truth. They talk about Nigeria with pride, but they will not live there. They will not fight for it. They will not build it. They love the flag, but they flee the soil. This is a big problem not just for Nigeria, but for everywhere they go. They bring their dysfunction, their entitlement, and their refusal to take responsibility. South Africa, the UK, the US, Canada, everywhere Nigerians go, they bring the same chaos they are running from. It is time to be honest. Nigerians need to love home enough to stay, to fight, and to build. Until then, they will remain a problem not just for themselves, but for the whole world. 🇿🇦✊🏾

Musa Ronalds

13,971 次观看 • 3 个月前

“First they came for the Communists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Communist Then they came for the Socialists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Socialist They came…” Nigeria! Your Demoncrazy is dead A Dictatorship born of impunity is crowned ..🇳🇬🤔

“First they came for the Communists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Communist Then they came for the Socialists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Socialist They came…” Nigeria! Your Demoncrazy is dead A Dictatorship born of impunity is crowned ..🇳🇬🤔

Dele Farotimi. A victim of Nigeria

55,925 次观看 • 1 年前

IT IS NOT OVER FOR VENEZUELA This is not the first setback for the Bolivarian Revolution. In 1992 Chávez launched the 4F uprising. It failed. He went to prison. The old order celebrated. They thought it was finished. Six years later he was elected. The movement that began as a failed military action became the government. A revolution does not die because one operation collapses or one leader is taken. Chávez was a lieutenant colonel, not a top general. Today’s purge of officers does not erase who sold the country. The next chapter is not another photo-op with Washington. It is whether enough people still remember 4F.

IT IS NOT OVER FOR VENEZUELA This is not the first setback for the Bolivarian Revolution. In 1992 Chávez launched the 4F uprising. It failed. He went to prison. The old order celebrated. They thought it was finished. Six years later he was elected. The movement that began as a failed military action became the government. A revolution does not die because one operation collapses or one leader is taken. Chávez was a lieutenant colonel, not a top general. Today’s purge of officers does not erase who sold the country. The next chapter is not another photo-op with Washington. It is whether enough people still remember 4F.

Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹

18,741 次观看 • 8 天前

Ongoing NDC convention today Nigeria is not a pøør country, it was løøted into pøverty, and we will change it. Look at our sign, ( the two fingers) it is the same sign our forefathers used for independence. It is a sign we will use to liberate Nigeria. A new Nigeria is possible — Mr Peter Obi. Peter Obi

Ongoing NDC convention today Nigeria is not a pøør country, it was løøted into pøverty, and we will change it. Look at our sign, ( the two fingers) it is the same sign our forefathers used for independence. It is a sign we will use to liberate Nigeria. A new Nigeria is possible — Mr Peter Obi. Peter Obi

Cee

23,282 次观看 • 4 个月前

Tony Robbins literally explained why Robin Williams achieved everything a person could want and still hung himself. It is not money. It is not fame. It is not an Oscar. It is the one skill that has no formula. He said there are two skills in an extraordinary life. The first is the science of achievement. How to take what you envision and make it real. Most successful people master this one and stop. The second is the art of fulfillment. Making money is a science. Feeling rich is not. Fulfillment is different for every human being alive. You cannot model it from someone else. Williams wanted to make the whole world laugh. He did it. He wanted his own show. It was a hit. He wanted an Academy Award for drama not comedy. He won it. He achieved everything on the list and hung himself. Robbins said he made everyone happy except himself. That is the ultimate failure. Robbins gets calls from multi-billionaires asking for business help. Within ten minutes they admit the truth. They are miserable. They mastered the science and never started the art. He said wealth is not a skill. It is a decision. He lives part-time in Fiji where villagers with nothing are the happiest people he knows. A wealthy American spends years planning to finally be happy. The Fijian says sit on the beach right now. The full interview is free. It will outlast almost everything else in your feed today.

Tony Robbins literally explained why Robin Williams achieved everything a person could want and still hung himself. It is not money. It is not fame. It is not an Oscar. It is the one skill that has no formula. He said there are two skills in an extraordinary life. The first is the science of achievement. How to take what you envision and make it real. Most successful people master this one and stop. The second is the art of fulfillment. Making money is a science. Feeling rich is not. Fulfillment is different for every human being alive. You cannot model it from someone else. Williams wanted to make the whole world laugh. He did it. He wanted his own show. It was a hit. He wanted an Academy Award for drama not comedy. He won it. He achieved everything on the list and hung himself. Robbins said he made everyone happy except himself. That is the ultimate failure. Robbins gets calls from multi-billionaires asking for business help. Within ten minutes they admit the truth. They are miserable. They mastered the science and never started the art. He said wealth is not a skill. It is a decision. He lives part-time in Fiji where villagers with nothing are the happiest people he knows. A wealthy American spends years planning to finally be happy. The Fijian says sit on the beach right now. The full interview is free. It will outlast almost everything else in your feed today.

Furiokao

252,057 次观看 • 3 天前

‼️Blake Neff’s BOMBSHELL Hospital Admission — They Were Already Talking About Candace's REACTION While Charlie Was In The Hospital 😱 Blake Neff just sat with Deseret News for a one-year profile and volunteered the weirdest detail of the week. He says he was in the waiting room at the Orem hospital after Charlie was taken to Timpanogos, and the conversation was not who did this. It was how Candace Owens would react. Someone said she would have an extreme reaction. Blake says he answered instantly: yeah, she will. Then he wrapped it in her France reporting and “weird stuff about Jewish cults” and Turning Point cooling on her in 2024. Sit with that. It is the middle of a manhunt. Nobody has a shooter, a motive, or a story yet. Blake has known Charlie about a year and a half. He has never met Candace. He is in Arizona. She is in Tennessee. And the first named thought he wants on the record from that waiting room is her. Not Charlie’s last texts. Not who his enemies were. Not the rooftop. Not the jet. Not the second Denali. Candace. That is why this lands like foreknowledge of the narrative, not grief. They were already sure the official story would be simple and already sure she would not swallow it. He will not name who said it. He develops amnesia around the same names. He talks too much because he wants to be the star of a year he cannot account for. They were worried about her in that hospital for a reason. She still will not bend the knee to the cookie-cutter rooftop. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

97,870 次观看 • 24 天前

Mark Zuckerberg just told you exactly why trillion-dollar companies lose to people who have nothing. Zuckerberg: “Large companies are slow and they lack conviction.” Nine words. The entire vulnerability of every empire on earth in a single sentence. Google had the talent. Microsoft had the infrastructure. Yahoo had the distribution. Every single one of them could have built Facebook. None of them did. Zuckerberg: “We were like a ragtag group of children.” Not seasoned executives. Not credentialed engineers with decades of experience. Children. Against the most well-funded technology companies on the planet. And the children won. Not because they were smarter. Not because they had better resources. Because they believed in something the giants were too comfortable to take seriously. Capital does not beat conviction. Infrastructure does not beat speed. Talent does not beat the willingness to look stupid building something no one respects yet. The giants had everything except the one thing that actually mattered. The inability to hesitate. A large company sees a new idea and runs it through committees. They commission research. They weigh the risk. They debate the market size. They ask what happens to the existing product line. By the time the organization agrees the idea is worth pursuing the window is already closed. The person who builds it does not go through that process. They just build. No committee. No consensus. No permission. They move before the math is finished because they can feel the answer before the spreadsheet confirms it. That is not recklessness. That is the only speed that matters when the window is open. Zuckerberg: “People doubt new ideas before they come to fruition.” It is never one doubt. It is a rotating series of doubts that shift every time the previous one is proven wrong. Zuckerberg: “It’s just like this college kid thing.” That was the first wall. It is small. It is niche. It is not serious. Then it grew. “Maybe not college kids, but it’s probably a fad.” Then it kept growing. “Maybe it’s not a fad, but it’s probably not gonna make money.” Then it made money. “Okay it makes money, but the switch to mobile is gonna be pretty hard.” Every single objection was wrong. Every single one served the same function. It gave the doubter permission to do nothing for one more cycle. That is not analysis. That is self-preservation dressed as skepticism. The person too slow to build the thing will always find a reason why the thing will not work. Not because the reasons are good. Because the alternative is admitting they missed it. You are watching the exact same pattern play out with AI right now. First it was a toy. Then it hallucinated too much. Then it was not profitable. Then it was a bubble. Then it was going to plateau. Every cycle the objection changes. The function never does. Zuckerberg built a company worth over a trillion dollars against competitors who had every advantage except the willingness to commit before the outcome was guaranteed. That is the only advantage that has ever mattered. Not capital. Not credentials. Not infrastructure. The willingness to be wrong in public long enough to become undeniably right. The giants will always have more money. More engineers. More servers. More distribution. They will always be slower than the person who does not need a meeting to make a decision. The committee will never outrun the individual who already started. The incumbents are not dangerous because they are strong. They are vulnerable because they are careful. And careful has never once in the history of technology built the thing that changed the world. It has only ever bought it after someone else already did.

Mark Zuckerberg just told you exactly why trillion-dollar companies lose to people who have nothing. Zuckerberg: “Large companies are slow and they lack conviction.” Nine words. The entire vulnerability of every empire on earth in a single sentence. Google had the talent. Microsoft had the infrastructure. Yahoo had the distribution. Every single one of them could have built Facebook. None of them did. Zuckerberg: “We were like a ragtag group of children.” Not seasoned executives. Not credentialed engineers with decades of experience. Children. Against the most well-funded technology companies on the planet. And the children won. Not because they were smarter. Not because they had better resources. Because they believed in something the giants were too comfortable to take seriously. Capital does not beat conviction. Infrastructure does not beat speed. Talent does not beat the willingness to look stupid building something no one respects yet. The giants had everything except the one thing that actually mattered. The inability to hesitate. A large company sees a new idea and runs it through committees. They commission research. They weigh the risk. They debate the market size. They ask what happens to the existing product line. By the time the organization agrees the idea is worth pursuing the window is already closed. The person who builds it does not go through that process. They just build. No committee. No consensus. No permission. They move before the math is finished because they can feel the answer before the spreadsheet confirms it. That is not recklessness. That is the only speed that matters when the window is open. Zuckerberg: “People doubt new ideas before they come to fruition.” It is never one doubt. It is a rotating series of doubts that shift every time the previous one is proven wrong. Zuckerberg: “It’s just like this college kid thing.” That was the first wall. It is small. It is niche. It is not serious. Then it grew. “Maybe not college kids, but it’s probably a fad.” Then it kept growing. “Maybe it’s not a fad, but it’s probably not gonna make money.” Then it made money. “Okay it makes money, but the switch to mobile is gonna be pretty hard.” Every single objection was wrong. Every single one served the same function. It gave the doubter permission to do nothing for one more cycle. That is not analysis. That is self-preservation dressed as skepticism. The person too slow to build the thing will always find a reason why the thing will not work. Not because the reasons are good. Because the alternative is admitting they missed it. You are watching the exact same pattern play out with AI right now. First it was a toy. Then it hallucinated too much. Then it was not profitable. Then it was a bubble. Then it was going to plateau. Every cycle the objection changes. The function never does. Zuckerberg built a company worth over a trillion dollars against competitors who had every advantage except the willingness to commit before the outcome was guaranteed. That is the only advantage that has ever mattered. Not capital. Not credentials. Not infrastructure. The willingness to be wrong in public long enough to become undeniably right. The giants will always have more money. More engineers. More servers. More distribution. They will always be slower than the person who does not need a meeting to make a decision. The committee will never outrun the individual who already started. The incumbents are not dangerous because they are strong. They are vulnerable because they are careful. And careful has never once in the history of technology built the thing that changed the world. It has only ever bought it after someone else already did.

Dustin

20,938 次观看 • 5 个月前

“When they brought the peace pact document, none of the aspirants read it. Hon. Bryan Acheampong signed where I was supposed to sign because he did not read it. That is how they sell Ghana, when they are given documents, they just sign.” - Kennedy Agyapong

“When they brought the peace pact document, none of the aspirants read it. Hon. Bryan Acheampong signed where I was supposed to sign because he did not read it. That is how they sell Ghana, when they are given documents, they just sign.” - Kennedy Agyapong

EDHUB🌍ℹ

177,242 次观看 • 8 个月前

Elon Musk just showed the world what happens when you walk into the vault and start counting. They don’t debate you. They try to end you. We are told government waste is an accident. A byproduct of incompetence. Musk proved it is a business. Defended. Coordinated. Worth hundreds of billions a year. Guarded by every institution that feeds from it. Musk: “You turn off the money spigot to fraudsters, they get very upset to say the least. My death threat level went ballistic.” The press had a villain ready before the ink dried. Politicians moved in unison to brand him a monster. The whole apparatus collapsed on one man with mechanical precision. It is not cancellation. It is annihilation. We were told this was about protecting democracy. It was about protecting the invoice. Joe Rogan: “The whole machine turns on you because you were getting in the way of this amazing graft.” Musk: “The goal was to destroy me absolutely.” Without his own platform and unlimited capital, they would have buried him and walked back to the vault. He survived. And he brought numbers. His work already prevented $200 to $300 billion a year in fraud. That is not a rounding error. That is a shadow economy the size of a G20 nation hidden inside your paycheck. Then he said the sentence that should keep every taxpayer awake at night. Musk: “Probably cut the federal budget in half. And get more done.” Half. Half of what they take from every cheque is not paying for civilization. It is not building roads. It is not funding schools. It is feeding the thing eating it from the inside. They did not come for him because he lied. If he had lied, they would have promoted him. They came for him because he counted.

Dustin

99,464 次观看 • 5 个月前

ART IS ART Art does not ask what tool you used. It asks if you made something worth looking at. That is the whole argument. The rest is noise. AI artists are not a glitch in the timeline. They are here. They ship. They stay up late. They build worlds, characters, mornings, and tiny impossible things that did not exist yesterday. Some people will keep calling it theft. Some will keep calling it slop. Fine. Let them talk. We will keep posting. If a piece moves you, that is art. If a community shows up under it and makes more, that is a scene. If someone found a way to tell their story after years of being locked out of the old gate, that is not a crime. That is the point. Support the work. Quote the piece you love. Leave the artist a real comment, not a lecture. The future is not waiting for permission. It is already on the timeline. We grow it together.

ART IS ART Art does not ask what tool you used. It asks if you made something worth looking at. That is the whole argument. The rest is noise. AI artists are not a glitch in the timeline. They are here. They ship. They stay up late. They build worlds, characters, mornings, and tiny impossible things that did not exist yesterday. Some people will keep calling it theft. Some will keep calling it slop. Fine. Let them talk. We will keep posting. If a piece moves you, that is art. If a community shows up under it and makes more, that is a scene. If someone found a way to tell their story after years of being locked out of the old gate, that is not a crime. That is the point. Support the work. Quote the piece you love. Leave the artist a real comment, not a lecture. The future is not waiting for permission. It is already on the timeline. We grow it together.

Toshi

17,977 次观看 • 27 天前

VIDEO | PTI Exclusive: MDR on UPI payments above Rs 2,000 will not be passed on to customers, says Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman She says, "They are not right. They are not correct. Because this is not a tax, this is not a cess, this is not even a surcharge. And the collection is not coming to the Consolidated Fund of India. So, let's first understand, this is not a government issue. The MDR is being charged by NPCI, the aggregator, the service provider, those who provide the POS machines and the merchant bank. They are the ones providing the service for transactions above Rs 2,000. The merchant is the one who is going to pay. That money is not coming to the Government of India and we are not imposing it. And this will not be passed on to the customer. In fact, it will not be charged even to the merchant for transactions below Rs 2,000." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | PTI Exclusive: MDR on UPI payments above Rs 2,000 will not be passed on to customers, says Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman She says, "They are not right. They are not correct. Because this is not a tax, this is not a cess, this is not even a surcharge. And the collection is not coming to the Consolidated Fund of India. So, let's first understand, this is not a government issue. The MDR is being charged by NPCI, the aggregator, the service provider, those who provide the POS machines and the merchant bank. They are the ones providing the service for transactions above Rs 2,000. The merchant is the one who is going to pay. That money is not coming to the Government of India and we are not imposing it. And this will not be passed on to the customer. In fact, it will not be charged even to the merchant for transactions below Rs 2,000." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

87,668 次观看 • 8 天前

Jensen Huang said the problem with AI was never the technology. It was the same problem we had when cars arrived and kids kept dying in the streets. He was asked why people are so afraid of AI. He did not dodge it. He reached back a hundred years. When cars first showed up, people said cars killed children. They believed the machine was hunting kids down. It sounds insane now. But the fear was real. Kids used to play in the streets. That was normal. Then cars arrived and children started dying. The car was not evil. The world it entered was built for a slower one. So we changed the world around it. We built sidewalks. We built crosswalks. We invented jaywalking. We added seat belts. We taught kids not to play in the road. None of that was one fix. It was a whole new set of rules layered on at the same time. His point about AI is the same. The technology is powerful. The fear is not stupid. But you do not freeze the machine. You build the norms around it. Then he gave the simplest advice in the whole interview. If you do not know how to use AI, open it up and ask it how to use AI. Try it before you judge it. We did not ban the car. We taught the world how to live with it. (Watch the full interview on YouTube at Associated Press)

Jensen Huang said the problem with AI was never the technology. It was the same problem we had when cars arrived and kids kept dying in the streets. He was asked why people are so afraid of AI. He did not dodge it. He reached back a hundred years. When cars first showed up, people said cars killed children. They believed the machine was hunting kids down. It sounds insane now. But the fear was real. Kids used to play in the streets. That was normal. Then cars arrived and children started dying. The car was not evil. The world it entered was built for a slower one. So we changed the world around it. We built sidewalks. We built crosswalks. We invented jaywalking. We added seat belts. We taught kids not to play in the road. None of that was one fix. It was a whole new set of rules layered on at the same time. His point about AI is the same. The technology is powerful. The fear is not stupid. But you do not freeze the machine. You build the norms around it. Then he gave the simplest advice in the whole interview. If you do not know how to use AI, open it up and ask it how to use AI. Try it before you judge it. We did not ban the car. We taught the world how to live with it. (Watch the full interview on YouTube at Associated Press)

Ihtesham Ali

19,268 次观看 • 3 个月前

🔥Holy Smokes: Stephen Miller takes a smug, combative Kasie Hunt to the WOODSHED as she tries to “gotcha” on Trump using an autopen, ignoring the ACTUAL POINT: "This is the most important point. It's not just that Joe Biden used the auto pen - it's that he didn't know it. He was not briefed on it. He was not aware of it. He did not approve it. He was not mentally aware of what the government was doing." “Biden didn’t know what was being signed in his name." My goodness. And CNN wonders why their ratings are a raging dumpster fire.

🔥Holy Smokes: Stephen Miller takes a smug, combative Kasie Hunt to the WOODSHED as she tries to “gotcha” on Trump using an autopen, ignoring the ACTUAL POINT: "This is the most important point. It's not just that Joe Biden used the auto pen - it's that he didn't know it. He was not briefed on it. He was not aware of it. He did not approve it. He was not mentally aware of what the government was doing." “Biden didn’t know what was being signed in his name." My goodness. And CNN wonders why their ratings are a raging dumpster fire.

Western Lensman

800,780 次观看 • 1 年前

.Renato Moicano explains why he did not take the UFC settlement payout: "I base the stuff that I do based on principles... and that's hard. I like money, but I would never rob a bank. I would never go against my word just to get money. That's my whole point. My whole point is when these people signed with the UFC, they were very happy about this. 10 years later they say, 'No. I was not happy. I was abused.' And then when they have the chance to keep going with the lawsuit, they dropped it because they did the settlement. So they got the money and the lawsuit is gone. Guess what? UFC will continue doing the same thing that you've been complaining about."

.Renato Moicano explains why he did not take the UFC settlement payout: "I base the stuff that I do based on principles... and that's hard. I like money, but I would never rob a bank. I would never go against my word just to get money. That's my whole point. My whole point is when these people signed with the UFC, they were very happy about this. 10 years later they say, 'No. I was not happy. I was abused.' And then when they have the chance to keep going with the lawsuit, they dropped it because they did the settlement. So they got the money and the lawsuit is gone. Guess what? UFC will continue doing the same thing that you've been complaining about."

Ariel Helwani

270,511 次观看 • 1 年前

Ian Lee is not doing a rant. He is doing arithmetic. Canada ships about $400 billion a year to the United States. That sounds like a weapon until you put it against their economy. It is about 1.5 percent of U.S. GDP. One and a half fingers. They are a $32 trillion machine. China is a distant second. We are just over two. A small country does not win a trade war with a large one. We do not have the cash or the cushion. Retaliation lands here first. Plants. Distilleries. The till. Not a podium in Washington. The part Ottawa will not say is the part that should enrage you. Trump did not invent the dependency. He did not ban pipelines for a decade. He did not write the $200 billion in interprovincial barriers. He did not decide we would sell almost everything south and then lecture the only customer. We did that. He found the cracks and pushed. Carney ran as the adult who could close a deal. Seventeen months later the file is a slogan and a walk-away. Elbows up polls. Arithmetic does not. Lee’s fix is not another speech in Europe. Kill the barriers between provinces. Move resources at volume. Stop pretending 1.5 percent of their GDP is a chokehold. You cannot bring the largest economy on earth to its knees with a rounding error. You can only bring your own plants to a stop and call it principle. #cdnpoli

Ian Lee is not doing a rant. He is doing arithmetic. Canada ships about $400 billion a year to the United States. That sounds like a weapon until you put it against their economy. It is about 1.5 percent of U.S. GDP. One and a half fingers. They are a $32 trillion machine. China is a distant second. We are just over two. A small country does not win a trade war with a large one. We do not have the cash or the cushion. Retaliation lands here first. Plants. Distilleries. The till. Not a podium in Washington. The part Ottawa will not say is the part that should enrage you. Trump did not invent the dependency. He did not ban pipelines for a decade. He did not write the $200 billion in interprovincial barriers. He did not decide we would sell almost everything south and then lecture the only customer. We did that. He found the cracks and pushed. Carney ran as the adult who could close a deal. Seventeen months later the file is a slogan and a walk-away. Elbows up polls. Arithmetic does not. Lee’s fix is not another speech in Europe. Kill the barriers between provinces. Move resources at volume. Stop pretending 1.5 percent of their GDP is a chokehold. You cannot bring the largest economy on earth to its knees with a rounding error. You can only bring your own plants to a stop and call it principle. #cdnpoli

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

77,891 次观看 • 7 天前

‼️NEW LAWSUIT JUST FILED IN UT: They Know They Can't Win The Harpole Case — So They Filed A Second One Against Candace. 👀 Robert L. Hild Jr. Just sued Candace Owens in federal court in Utah on September 28, 2026. The case number is 2:26-cv-00896. His complaint says she told millions of people that he helped kill Charlie Kirk, that he belonged to a secret group, and that he was the man in the stairwell photographs. That is not what she said. She said he looks more like the man on those stairs than Tyler Robinson does, and she asked the same questions the public has been asking. Asking a question is not the same as accusing a man of murder. The timing is the tell. Brian Harpole already sued her in Tennessee, and that case is not going the way his side hoped. A second lawsuit arrived in Utah just days after the university released its after-action report. Turning Point and thr fedsloppers are behind this and i believe Turning Point is banrolling the lawsuit. There is a reason this was filed in UT. Utah is Mormon mafia teritory and the same people they control who helped facilitate Charlie's murder are the same people who will now be hearing this case. In other words, where they have friends. A private citizen does not produce a 173-page federal complaint, with lawyers in Salt Lake City and San Francisco, because a podcaster asked a question. The goal is to drain her money. The second goal is a headline that says a court found her guilty of falsely accusing someone of murder, so the press can use it to try to further discredit her investigation. Candace never named Robert Hild as the shooter. She said the photographs do not match Tyler Robinson. That question is still open. This lawsuit does not close it. Here is the full 73 Page Complaint filed by Hild If you want to read it for yourself. (pause to read) ⚠️Day 24 with no monetization. They did not debate us. They cut the paycheck. A lot of people got used to that and stopped noticing. The work did not stop. The bills did not either. If you still want this investigation alive, tap the link and put something in the hat. Complacency is how they win. Thank you to everyone who is still here.

‼️NEW LAWSUIT JUST FILED IN UT: They Know They Can't Win The Harpole Case — So They Filed A Second One Against Candace. 👀 Robert L. Hild Jr. Just sued Candace Owens in federal court in Utah on September 28, 2026. The case number is 2:26-cv-00896. His complaint says she told millions of people that he helped kill Charlie Kirk, that he belonged to a secret group, and that he was the man in the stairwell photographs. That is not what she said. She said he looks more like the man on those stairs than Tyler Robinson does, and she asked the same questions the public has been asking. Asking a question is not the same as accusing a man of murder. The timing is the tell. Brian Harpole already sued her in Tennessee, and that case is not going the way his side hoped. A second lawsuit arrived in Utah just days after the university released its after-action report. Turning Point and thr fedsloppers are behind this and i believe Turning Point is banrolling the lawsuit. There is a reason this was filed in UT. Utah is Mormon mafia teritory and the same people they control who helped facilitate Charlie's murder are the same people who will now be hearing this case. In other words, where they have friends. A private citizen does not produce a 173-page federal complaint, with lawyers in Salt Lake City and San Francisco, because a podcaster asked a question. The goal is to drain her money. The second goal is a headline that says a court found her guilty of falsely accusing someone of murder, so the press can use it to try to further discredit her investigation. Candace never named Robert Hild as the shooter. She said the photographs do not match Tyler Robinson. That question is still open. This lawsuit does not close it. Here is the full 73 Page Complaint filed by Hild If you want to read it for yourself. (pause to read) ⚠️Day 24 with no monetization. They did not debate us. They cut the paycheck. A lot of people got used to that and stopped noticing. The work did not stop. The bills did not either. If you still want this investigation alive, tap the link and put something in the hat. Complacency is how they win. Thank you to everyone who is still here.

Project Constitution

48,364 次观看 • 3 天前

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Hopewell Chin’ono

68,177 次观看 • 10 个月前