正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Peter Thiel explains the rise of Germany's AfD party: "It reflects these failures of the centrist parties." "It reflects a failure to find an economic future for Germany that somehow is inclusive and broad and works for the society as a whole." "I don't think they have great solutions....

59,485 次观看 • 4 天前 •via X (Twitter)

8 条评论

Serag Aldin Badr 的头像
Serag Aldin Badr4 天前

Hes kinda right. AFD will scapegoat migration, but they will still not solve the economy question. Ultimatelly young Germans are sacrificed in favor of short term wins for the old electorate.

Tiger Cat 的头像
Tiger Cat4 天前

I hate stupid, thoughtless comments like “No one knows how to balance the budget” as if our problem is stupidity. Everyone knows how to balance the budget. But because we insist on stupid people voting, you cant balance the budget and win an election.

Bastian Brauns 的头像
Bastian Brauns4 天前

@MrMaitra Take a look at the budget in the US under Trump.

M.-P. S. 🇩🇪 的头像
M.-P. S. 🇩🇪4 天前

Agree , still vote for them , cause values have to be reshifted , i don't see a concept from any party , so this wasn't a criteria!

Brian Via 的头像
Brian Via4 天前

@grok is this full interview available somewhere?

aragornthelord007 的头像
aragornthelord0074 天前

Just commies

✧ Sofi w. 的头像
✧ Sofi w.4 天前

Thiel blames centrist economics, but AfD's rise is equally about cultural backlash. Was Merkel's immigration policy also a "failure"?

Unit 5 🇬🇧 的头像
Unit 5 🇬🇧4 天前

The AfD has to wade through the mud and rebalance their migration problem; it would be unfair and if I may present my opinion, "slightly flawed to judge a fluid situation "at" this moment intime." I've noticed their principles and values are in the right place to build a foundation.

相关视频

The View whines that Knicks owner James Dolan accepted an invitation to have the team visit the White House: SARA HAINES: I think this puts the players in a really precarious position. Merely because Jim Dolan is admittedly a good friend of Donald Trump's. And to now put that on the players, your boss, the owner of the team you play for is extending this offer, accepting this offer. I don't - I know you might get people that refuse to go. I just think it's not fair to take any of the flowers and beauty of this moment and its unity and try to then place it on the players' back. ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: I totally agree. I think it puts the players in such an uncomfortable position, cause it was honestly the first thing I thought of once they won the championship, as a new Knicks fan, is like, "Oh no, they're going to get invited to the White House and there's this political discourse. Should they go, shout they not?" I think they should go if they want to. If they're comfortable going, because the White House is bigger than any one president and precedency. HAINES: It's our house. FARAH GRIFFIN: They earned the right to go as champions, but I also think they have the right to refuse too. If any individual players don't want to, that's their decision. And I also they can use the big platforms they have. I mean, these guys all have millions of followers on social media. If they want to stand up for causes or if they want to potentially critique this administration, there's a way that everyone should win. I don't think it's fair if they do decide to go, I don't think they should get hate it. It's there place to.

Nicholas Fondacaro

67,122 次观看 • 3 个月前

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

The All-In Podcast

575,206 次观看 • 5 个月前

William got margin called and pledged over $1B of his own stock to fund Column. He explains why extreme personal risk is what makes great founders, and why we see less of it today: "I think that the good founders bet on themselves and take an extreme amount of risk to do that. The extreme amount of risk part is something that we no longer have. But when there's literally only one door in front of you. You don't have a choice, and that fear and innate desire creates another part of you. It creates creativity, it creates inspiration. It's extremely valuable part of the founder journey. And in many ways, Silicon Valley we've actually removed that. I don't know why we don't talk about it more. If you go back to pre 2008, you're on the edge of the knife. We don't create environments where a founder has to bet themselves. I think starting companies are just too f**king safe. It's caused a lot of companies to be super safe companies like, we're gonna pivot to AI...that's not bold, that's not ambitious. It's because we are attracting founders that actually want to be employees. They don't think if I don't pull this off, I'm going to become bankrupt. My life is over and I think that's pretty healthy. That's when you bring out the rawness of humanity and I don't see that very much anymore. The weird thing is an early stage employee takes way more risk than an early stage founder. And I don't think we should actually de-risk the early stage employee. I just think we need to increase the risk for founders. I think we need to make failure much more expensive."

Patrick OShaughnessy

86,597 次观看 • 6 个月前