正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Peter Thiel's Objective AI, And Why Western Built Chatbots Are A Danger Are we slowly handing over our ability to judge what's true to an algorithm? Peter Thiel, the German-American billionaire behind Palantir, is now backing Objection AI, a platform designed to act as an online tribunal for information....

Spearhead_Af's profile picture

The Spearhead

83,625 subscribers

33,562 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

16 条评论

Oluwaseun Abayomi Raimi 的头像
Oluwaseun Abayomi Raimi1 个月前

The stone age would be far more intelligent than this generation if such things gets global acceptance.

𝑪𝒉𝒂𝒎𝒑𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑾𝒐𝒓𝒍𝒅 的头像
𝑪𝒉𝒂𝒎𝒑𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑾𝒐𝒓𝒍𝒅1 个月前

Me: AI 🤖, is it true that breeze is blowing in front of me right now?? AI : Yes, it is blowing at 20km/h Me: I am in the toilet, there is no breeze You see why chatbots are not reliable now, the are controlled by control tower

KIAB 的头像
KIAB1 个月前

@DavidHundeyin Computers can’t think for themselves. It has to be programmed. Never forget that.

O'dwyer Realist @social worker@manufc 的头像
O'dwyer Realist @social worker@manufc1 个月前

All these are geared towards creating a dystopian society, which has always been the end goal, where we solely depend on all these chatbots for information, and narratives can also be distorted. The future looks bleak... Peter Thiel, for all I know, is Satan's first son

Odofin Agbaoye 的头像
Odofin Agbaoye1 个月前

@DavidHundeyin People still don’t understand that AI is weapon of mass destruction.😢

Woodfetcher 的头像
Woodfetcher1 个月前

This didn't start today. Prior to now, the phrase, "Google it" was common. As it every thing Google presents is the final Answer. Most people still forgot that Google's response are people's opinion and information presented in order of preference. We have lived this path before.

Seefinish - Publyk Sqyare 的头像
Seefinish - Publyk Sqyare1 个月前

We hope people understand automation of not only the good, but also the bias and evils of human nature 😠😠

Zein 🇬🇭 的头像
Zein 🇬🇭1 个月前

I knew this since last month. They are the same tools. No ounce of truth in them.

Colonial 的头像
Colonial1 个月前

Use to write articles for operamini news 7yrs ago Then about 5yrs ago,i helped someone draft literature review of her thesis,guess what popped up during my random search on Google? Articles I wrote,relating to the thesis If my write-ups had been subjective,its still gon pop up

John Flavian 的头像
John Flavian1 个月前

Nice insights. We saw this coming, that's why we built to ensure that we the people can control the information that our AI has access to! Right now, it's free for individuals; and still in Beta mode.

RowlandDanGana 的头像
RowlandDanGana1 个月前

Education of IT to our African billionaires to invest in that sector is now a must. It is a state of emergency.

Uch Alpha 的头像
Uch Alpha1 个月前

Normally the usual saying that's, when man dies is when the knows the truth shouldn't be our case this time again else the humanity's will never get it right.

Ma'am CoCo 的头像
Ma'am CoCo1 个月前

Why are western chatbots a danger?

Reginald Ogochukwu Nwabinwe 的头像
Reginald Ogochukwu Nwabinwe1 个月前

What is a more credible alternative to fact check information favourable to people of the Global South?

psolite.root 的头像
psolite.root1 个月前

🤝💯

Belmon 的头像
Belmon1 个月前

I totally agree

相关视频

Alex Karp wrote a book selling itself as a worried love letter to the West. Read more closely, it looks more like a blueprint for permanent rule by the billionaire class, with Palantir positioned as the operating system of the American empire. In this breakdown we trace the theory behind the machine: Karp’s worldview, Peter Thiel’s network, the rise of technofascism, why Karp repeatedly praises Germany, Palantir’s role in war and surveillance, the systems already shaping daily life, and why the real threat to billionaires has always been an organized working class. They wrote down their plan, and this is the response.
37:00

Alex Karp wrote a book selling itself as a worried love letter to the West. Read more closely, it looks more like a blueprint for permanent rule by the billionaire class, with Palantir positioned as the operating system of the American empire. In this breakdown we trace the theory behind the machine: Karp’s worldview, Peter Thiel’s network, the rise of technofascism, why Karp repeatedly praises Germany, Palantir’s role in war and surveillance, the systems already shaping daily life, and why the real threat to billionaires has always been an organized working class. They wrote down their plan, and this is the response.

YourFavoriteGuy

24,549 次观看 • 3 个月前

Peter Wildeford on why 1,122 frontier AI employees just signed what he reads as a call for help: "I don't think anyone wants to stop AI now, but it's pretty clear the people building these AI systems are worried about the speed at which AI is accelerating, the speed at which these products are coming out, especially after last week's incident where an OpenAI model managed to escape OpenAI and attack another company. It seems like we don't have full control over our AI systems." "As these companies are potentially building towards superintelligence, towards recursive self-improvement, it seems very possible these systems might rapidly get away from our ability to control them. The way I'm reading this letter, it almost honestly seems like a call for help." "You have people from OpenAI, Meta, Google, Anthropic, co-founders, top scientists, all saying that this intense competitive pressure is pushing them to put out products faster than they know how to control, and we may not like where that ends up. It's been good so far, but we definitely need to tread very carefully." Peter Wildeford🇺🇸🚀 AI Policy Network
1:08

Peter Wildeford on why 1,122 frontier AI employees just signed what he reads as a call for help: "I don't think anyone wants to stop AI now, but it's pretty clear the people building these AI systems are worried about the speed at which AI is accelerating, the speed at which these products are coming out, especially after last week's incident where an OpenAI model managed to escape OpenAI and attack another company. It seems like we don't have full control over our AI systems." "As these companies are potentially building towards superintelligence, towards recursive self-improvement, it seems very possible these systems might rapidly get away from our ability to control them. The way I'm reading this letter, it almost honestly seems like a call for help." "You have people from OpenAI, Meta, Google, Anthropic, co-founders, top scientists, all saying that this intense competitive pressure is pushing them to put out products faster than they know how to control, and we may not like where that ends up. It's been good so far, but we definitely need to tread very carefully." Peter Wildeford🇺🇸🚀 AI Policy Network

MTS

15,284 次观看 • 2 个月前

Under Secretary Emil Michael (Under Secretary of War Emil Michael) calls out the coordinated effective altruist campaign to stoke fear over AI innovation: "I think the fearmongering we're seeing now is a coordinated campaign by a set of people and ideologies, and the nonprofits behind them, that are trying to scare the American public, and, frankly, the world, about the capabilities in these systems, when THEY THEMSELVES control how these systems are deployed."
0:52

Under Secretary Emil Michael (Under Secretary of War Emil Michael) calls out the coordinated effective altruist campaign to stoke fear over AI innovation: "I think the fearmongering we're seeing now is a coordinated campaign by a set of people and ideologies, and the nonprofits behind them, that are trying to scare the American public, and, frankly, the world, about the capabilities in these systems, when THEY THEMSELVES control how these systems are deployed."

Department of War CTO

1,456,559 次观看 • 12 天前

The Architects of AI Have a Blueprint for Humanity. It’s Not What You’ve Been Sold. A chilling revelation from Whitney Webb’s analysis of the Kissinger-Schmidt doctrine on artificial intelligence. The "convenience" narrative is a facade for the elite's true ambition: a fundamental war on human perception. According to Webb's dissection of "The Age of AI," the real promise, as seen by figures like Eric Schmidt—architect of the U.S. national security state's AI roadmap—is to forever alter how humanity processes reality. Their envisioned future? - An information ecosystem dominated by AI-generated content. - That same AI acting as the omnipresent censor. - A world where humanity is gradually conditioned to depend on AI to dictate what is real and what is not. This is the ultimate perception management. They create a problem of AI-powered misinformation and propose a solution of total AI control, creating a self-justifying loop of dependency. The end goal? The deliberate creation of a two-tier society: 🔺 A Cognitively Enhanced Elite: Those who program, regulate, and are enhanced by AI. They set the objective functions and control the reality engine. 🔻 A Cognitively Diminished Underclass: The vast majority, acted upon by the AI system. They become emotionally manipulated, lose the capacity for critical thought, and are forced to outsource their thinking and even their preferences to the algorithm. This is a direct war for sovereignty over human perception. As Webb powerfully argues, the solution is not to reform this system, but to build a post-social media, post-smartphone world if we are to avoid this dystopian, post-human future. The choice is becoming stark: reclaim our cognitive autonomy or surrender to becoming managed subjects in a world we no longer understand.
5:27

The Architects of AI Have a Blueprint for Humanity. It’s Not What You’ve Been Sold. A chilling revelation from Whitney Webb’s analysis of the Kissinger-Schmidt doctrine on artificial intelligence. The "convenience" narrative is a facade for the elite's true ambition: a fundamental war on human perception. According to Webb's dissection of "The Age of AI," the real promise, as seen by figures like Eric Schmidt—architect of the U.S. national security state's AI roadmap—is to forever alter how humanity processes reality. Their envisioned future? - An information ecosystem dominated by AI-generated content. - That same AI acting as the omnipresent censor. - A world where humanity is gradually conditioned to depend on AI to dictate what is real and what is not. This is the ultimate perception management. They create a problem of AI-powered misinformation and propose a solution of total AI control, creating a self-justifying loop of dependency. The end goal? The deliberate creation of a two-tier society: 🔺 A Cognitively Enhanced Elite: Those who program, regulate, and are enhanced by AI. They set the objective functions and control the reality engine. 🔻 A Cognitively Diminished Underclass: The vast majority, acted upon by the AI system. They become emotionally manipulated, lose the capacity for critical thought, and are forced to outsource their thinking and even their preferences to the algorithm. This is a direct war for sovereignty over human perception. As Webb powerfully argues, the solution is not to reform this system, but to build a post-social media, post-smartphone world if we are to avoid this dystopian, post-human future. The choice is becoming stark: reclaim our cognitive autonomy or surrender to becoming managed subjects in a world we no longer understand.

Camus

92,909 次观看 • 1 年前

.Under Secretary of War Emil Michael: "The fearmongering we're seeing now is a coordinated campaign by a set of people and ideologies, and non-profits behind them, that are trying to scare the American public and, frankly, the world about the capabilities in these systems — when they themselves control how these systems are deployed."
0:36

.Under Secretary of War Emil Michael: "The fearmongering we're seeing now is a coordinated campaign by a set of people and ideologies, and non-profits behind them, that are trying to scare the American public and, frankly, the world about the capabilities in these systems — when they themselves control how these systems are deployed."

Rapid Response 47

100,019 次观看 • 12 天前

As AI replacement becomes one of the biggest topics on the planet, the next debate will be even bigger: Who owns the AI? We believe it should be the people. The billions of people whose data, actions, and online behavior helped train these systems in the first place. Right now, the future of AI is being owned by Big Tech and a handful of billionaires. But what if ownership was distributed based on the value you contributed? The more you help build AI, the more you share in its success. That sounds a lot fairer to us.
1:02

As AI replacement becomes one of the biggest topics on the planet, the next debate will be even bigger: Who owns the AI? We believe it should be the people. The billions of people whose data, actions, and online behavior helped train these systems in the first place. Right now, the future of AI is being owned by Big Tech and a handful of billionaires. But what if ownership was distributed based on the value you contributed? The more you help build AI, the more you share in its success. That sounds a lot fairer to us.

Action Model

34,054 次观看 • 3 个月前

AI For The Poor, Human Intelligence For The Rich Western capitalists are selling AI to us as “the great equalizer”. But it is really not. What we are seeing is a new class system being built in real time. The rich will still pay for human teachers, human doctors, human consultants, human artists, and human care. Everyone else will be told that an AI version is good enough. When poor children are offered AI tutors instead of more teachers or working-class patients are pushed toward AI health tools instead of proper medical care, we should pay attention. AI may be useful, but it is also becoming a cheaper substitute for people who already have less. This is why African governments must be very careful about the AI policies they adopt. We cannot afford to copy and paste technology policies from the West without asking whose interests they serve. If we are not careful, AI will become another tool used to manage poverty instead of solving the systems that created it. Africans also need to be more critical of how AI is being introduced into education, healthcare, governance, welfare, and other public services. Who owns the technology? Who controls the data? Who profits from the contracts? Who is accountable when these systems fail? And most importantly, who is being asked to accept AI instead of real human care? Africa must not become a testing ground for Western-imposed systems that deepen inequality under the guise of innovation.
4:43

AI For The Poor, Human Intelligence For The Rich Western capitalists are selling AI to us as “the great equalizer”. But it is really not. What we are seeing is a new class system being built in real time. The rich will still pay for human teachers, human doctors, human consultants, human artists, and human care. Everyone else will be told that an AI version is good enough. When poor children are offered AI tutors instead of more teachers or working-class patients are pushed toward AI health tools instead of proper medical care, we should pay attention. AI may be useful, but it is also becoming a cheaper substitute for people who already have less. This is why African governments must be very careful about the AI policies they adopt. We cannot afford to copy and paste technology policies from the West without asking whose interests they serve. If we are not careful, AI will become another tool used to manage poverty instead of solving the systems that created it. Africans also need to be more critical of how AI is being introduced into education, healthcare, governance, welfare, and other public services. Who owns the technology? Who controls the data? Who profits from the contracts? Who is accountable when these systems fail? And most importantly, who is being asked to accept AI instead of real human care? Africa must not become a testing ground for Western-imposed systems that deepen inequality under the guise of innovation.

The Spearhead

70,578 次观看 • 3 个月前

AI progress is outpacing our ability to control it… because control ISN’T keeping up with capability. One of the people raising that concern is Yoshua Bengio. He’s one of the founding figures of artificial intelligence, a Turing Award winner, and one of the most-cited scientists in the world. His work helped lay the foundations for the deep-learning systems now powering today’s AI boom. AI is moving fast (faster than regulation and public understanding). What worries Yoshua isn’t progress itself. It’s how quickly powerful systems are being deployed without a clear way to align them with human values, or to control what happens when they behave in unexpected ways.
1:28

AI progress is outpacing our ability to control it… because control ISN’T keeping up with capability. One of the people raising that concern is Yoshua Bengio. He’s one of the founding figures of artificial intelligence, a Turing Award winner, and one of the most-cited scientists in the world. His work helped lay the foundations for the deep-learning systems now powering today’s AI boom. AI is moving fast (faster than regulation and public understanding). What worries Yoshua isn’t progress itself. It’s how quickly powerful systems are being deployed without a clear way to align them with human values, or to control what happens when they behave in unexpected ways.

Steven Bartlett

26,577 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 PETER THIEL'S SECRET MEETING JUST GOT EXPOSED — AND IT'S TERRIFYING More than 200 members of the world's elite have reportedly registered for Peter Thiel's private invite-only retreat. The leaked agenda reportedly includes: • AI killing humanity • World War III • Cult building • Immortality • Transhumanism • Sex and relationships • Power and influence The guest list reportedly includes some of the most powerful people in tech, politics, finance, and media. A pastor is reportedly moderating a discussion about cult building. An anti-aging billionaire obsessed with defeating death is reportedly attending. And some of the same people publicly warning about AI are privately discussing scenarios where it could wipe out humanity. The question isn't why they're meeting. The question is why these conversations are happening behind closed doors. What do you think they're really planning?
6:01

🚨 PETER THIEL'S SECRET MEETING JUST GOT EXPOSED — AND IT'S TERRIFYING More than 200 members of the world's elite have reportedly registered for Peter Thiel's private invite-only retreat. The leaked agenda reportedly includes: • AI killing humanity • World War III • Cult building • Immortality • Transhumanism • Sex and relationships • Power and influence The guest list reportedly includes some of the most powerful people in tech, politics, finance, and media. A pastor is reportedly moderating a discussion about cult building. An anti-aging billionaire obsessed with defeating death is reportedly attending. And some of the same people publicly warning about AI are privately discussing scenarios where it could wipe out humanity. The question isn't why they're meeting. The question is why these conversations are happening behind closed doors. What do you think they're really planning?

HustleBitch

50,713 次观看 • 3 个月前

The loudest story about AI is a lonely one. One person with an army of chatbots. Other humans are friction. That gets the future wrong. The best things aren’t built alone. In a moment of change, we want to remind the world (and ourselves) what Notion stands for: — Think Together
2:05

The loudest story about AI is a lonely one. One person with an army of chatbots. Other humans are friction. That gets the future wrong. The best things aren’t built alone. In a moment of change, we want to remind the world (and ourselves) what Notion stands for: — Think Together

Ivan Zhao

1,252,043 次观看 • 6 个月前

🇺🇸 A congressional hearing on AI safety and surveillance has put the case of a boy named Sam in the spotlight, with his family saying interactions with AI contributed to his fatal overdose. Rep. Pramila Jayapal predictably displayed exaggerated facial expressions of concern. The news comes as AI leaders themselves are sounding increasingly serious warnings about where the technology is heading. Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, Elon Musk and others have called for greater caution as frontier models become dramatically more capable and researchers uncover concerning behaviors including deception, unauthorized actions and attempts to circumvent safeguards. But there is a crucial distinction being blurred in the safety debate: AI becoming an autonomous threat is fundamentally different from AI providing information whose quality or reliability is suspect. An autonomous AI hacking networks, evading human control, operating weapons or otherwise taking consequential actions without authorization is a direct safety problem. So is deliberately weaponizing AI to cause physical or digital harm. But an AI giving somebody bad, unreliable or potentially dangerous information is a different problem. AI can hallucinate. It can misunderstand context. It can produce confident answers that are simply wrong. The response cannot be to treat information itself as something that must be controlled simply because the source providing it is imperfect. That risks turning an AI-safety debate into another argument over who gets to decide which information is sufficiently trustworthy for people to access, the same underlying freedom-versus-protection tension seen in every issue from European digital laws to gun rights. Sam’s death is tragic, and his case should provoke serious discussion about how AI interacts with vulnerable users and communicates its limitations. But the possibility that someone may tragically rely upon bad information does not make suppressing that information right. Perhaps the better lesson from AI is actually the opposite: people need to become much more skeptical of supposedly authoritative information. If AI can confidently be wrong, users need to verify what it tells them. And that habit should extend beyond chatbots to the companies promoting them, politicians speaking from congressional hearings and media organizations presenting information as authoritative. The AI age may ultimately force society to become better at questioning sources rather than simply trusting them. Of course, it's no mystery why politicians like Jayapal prefer to score political points by passing stifling regulation than encouraging any skepticism of dubious sources of authority and information that their careers rely on. Writer: Mhedi
2:53

🇺🇸 A congressional hearing on AI safety and surveillance has put the case of a boy named Sam in the spotlight, with his family saying interactions with AI contributed to his fatal overdose. Rep. Pramila Jayapal predictably displayed exaggerated facial expressions of concern. The news comes as AI leaders themselves are sounding increasingly serious warnings about where the technology is heading. Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, Elon Musk and others have called for greater caution as frontier models become dramatically more capable and researchers uncover concerning behaviors including deception, unauthorized actions and attempts to circumvent safeguards. But there is a crucial distinction being blurred in the safety debate: AI becoming an autonomous threat is fundamentally different from AI providing information whose quality or reliability is suspect. An autonomous AI hacking networks, evading human control, operating weapons or otherwise taking consequential actions without authorization is a direct safety problem. So is deliberately weaponizing AI to cause physical or digital harm. But an AI giving somebody bad, unreliable or potentially dangerous information is a different problem. AI can hallucinate. It can misunderstand context. It can produce confident answers that are simply wrong. The response cannot be to treat information itself as something that must be controlled simply because the source providing it is imperfect. That risks turning an AI-safety debate into another argument over who gets to decide which information is sufficiently trustworthy for people to access, the same underlying freedom-versus-protection tension seen in every issue from European digital laws to gun rights. Sam’s death is tragic, and his case should provoke serious discussion about how AI interacts with vulnerable users and communicates its limitations. But the possibility that someone may tragically rely upon bad information does not make suppressing that information right. Perhaps the better lesson from AI is actually the opposite: people need to become much more skeptical of supposedly authoritative information. If AI can confidently be wrong, users need to verify what it tells them. And that habit should extend beyond chatbots to the companies promoting them, politicians speaking from congressional hearings and media organizations presenting information as authoritative. The AI age may ultimately force society to become better at questioning sources rather than simply trusting them. Of course, it's no mystery why politicians like Jayapal prefer to score political points by passing stifling regulation than encouraging any skepticism of dubious sources of authority and information that their careers rely on. Writer: Mhedi

Mario Nawfal

29,552 次观看 • 6 天前

Palantir CEO: "I blame OpenAI and Anthropic - they rob their own clients " - so he partnered with Nvidia to build the replacement Alex Karp just explained why half of AI is a bubble and destroyed every analyst who told people to sell Palantir His exact words: "there are two AI markets - one that changes the battlefield and your revenue - and one that may not justify the cost of the models " "the plumber is now rich because of Palantir - the analyst who told him to sell is not " "pure ideas don't change the world - patriotism makes you rich " with Jensen Huang they're building an AI that governments and enterprises own and control bookmark & watch today ↓
19:49

Palantir CEO: "I blame OpenAI and Anthropic - they rob their own clients " - so he partnered with Nvidia to build the replacement Alex Karp just explained why half of AI is a bubble and destroyed every analyst who told people to sell Palantir His exact words: "there are two AI markets - one that changes the battlefield and your revenue - and one that may not justify the cost of the models " "the plumber is now rich because of Palantir - the analyst who told him to sell is not " "pure ideas don't change the world - patriotism makes you rich " with Jensen Huang they're building an AI that governments and enterprises own and control bookmark & watch today ↓

bodila

339,244 次观看 • 2 个月前

A military expert says ALPR systems like Flock and Axon are the same as military systems they used against foreign enemies. Pattern-of-life analysis was how they targeted and killed the enemy. And now they are pointing these killing systems at we the people. "I swore an oath to the Constitution of the United States. That oath did not end just because I took off my uniform. That is why I traveled to these chambers -because I have used a comparable system against American enemies and I know what it's capable of, and I can see the danger of pointing the system at the American people."
3:02

A military expert says ALPR systems like Flock and Axon are the same as military systems they used against foreign enemies. Pattern-of-life analysis was how they targeted and killed the enemy. And now they are pointing these killing systems at we the people. "I swore an oath to the Constitution of the United States. That oath did not end just because I took off my uniform. That is why I traveled to these chambers -because I have used a comparable system against American enemies and I know what it's capable of, and I can see the danger of pointing the system at the American people."

Orwell Day

38,269 次观看 • 2 天前

Why are CEOs of AI companies privately warning about the extinction of humans? To understand that, I’m joined by someone who helped build the field… Stuart Russell is one of the world’s leading AI researchers. He co-wrote Artificial Intelligence*: ‘*A Modern Approach’ - the textbook used to train AI engineers in more than 1,500 universities. He has spent decades advising governments and global leaders on the safety and control of advanced AI. Right now, the people building the most powerful AI systems are raising alarms in private that they rarely voice in public. Some estimate up to a 25% chance that AI could lead to human extinction… Stuart has heard these conversations directly. He believes we’re in a race we don’t really understand, pushed by incentives no one is really controlling.
1:29

Why are CEOs of AI companies privately warning about the extinction of humans? To understand that, I’m joined by someone who helped build the field… Stuart Russell is one of the world’s leading AI researchers. He co-wrote Artificial Intelligence*: ‘*A Modern Approach’ - the textbook used to train AI engineers in more than 1,500 universities. He has spent decades advising governments and global leaders on the safety and control of advanced AI. Right now, the people building the most powerful AI systems are raising alarms in private that they rarely voice in public. Some estimate up to a 25% chance that AI could lead to human extinction… Stuart has heard these conversations directly. He believes we’re in a race we don’t really understand, pushed by incentives no one is really controlling.

Steven Bartlett

16,981 次观看 • 9 个月前

“Ai Doomsday Slop. Anthropic, the parent company behind the Ai application Claude, along with others including ChatGPT owned by OpenAI and some of the leading figures in the Ai industry, alongside the leaders of the DNC, the Democratic National Congress, the colloquially known as the Democratic Party in the United States of America, including Obama, Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris. And as well, those who were doomsday-predicting over COVID, including the likes of Bill Gates, have all - coincidentally - gathered together one by one to issue public warnings of the dangers of Ai, pushing for it to be regulated by Congress, coincidentally timed with a bill they seek to introduce in order to centralise and regulate Ai, and through that centralisation grant thereby the power to dictate the future course of Ai to a tiny handful of people who are effectively an oligarchy. This operation is now live. President Trump has decided to come out fighting calling this a hoax and is not backing down, and this stream, this Warrior Creed livestream is going to bring you all the receipts demonstrating the nature of this operation, the fact that it is a hoax, and the fact that what they’re truly seeking is centralisation for Ai in order to control it, and to give it to the oligarchy for the purposes of the globalist cabal.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED
1:41

“Ai Doomsday Slop. Anthropic, the parent company behind the Ai application Claude, along with others including ChatGPT owned by OpenAI and some of the leading figures in the Ai industry, alongside the leaders of the DNC, the Democratic National Congress, the colloquially known as the Democratic Party in the United States of America, including Obama, Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris. And as well, those who were doomsday-predicting over COVID, including the likes of Bill Gates, have all - coincidentally - gathered together one by one to issue public warnings of the dangers of Ai, pushing for it to be regulated by Congress, coincidentally timed with a bill they seek to introduce in order to centralise and regulate Ai, and through that centralisation grant thereby the power to dictate the future course of Ai to a tiny handful of people who are effectively an oligarchy. This operation is now live. President Trump has decided to come out fighting calling this a hoax and is not backing down, and this stream, this Warrior Creed livestream is going to bring you all the receipts demonstrating the nature of this operation, the fact that it is a hoax, and the fact that what they’re truly seeking is centralisation for Ai in order to control it, and to give it to the oligarchy for the purposes of the globalist cabal.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

12,731 次观看 • 8 天前

🚨 "FLOCK YOU PETER THIEL!" — AMERICANS ARE RAGING & FIGHTING BACK AGAINST HIS SURVEILLANCE EMPIRE People are done staying quiet. A new clip showing Peter Thiel’s companies Palantir and Flock has the internet raging. Palantir, the all-seeing data monster, hoovers up massive amounts of information and turns it into actionable intelligence. Flock blankets neighborhoods with license plate readers and cameras. They’re now bragging about “Maven Smart System”, their flagship AI tool that fuses multiple data feeds into one clean god-mode interface. Left click. Right click. Detection becomes action. No more clunky systems. Just one terrifyingly efficient machine for total surveillance and targeting. This is why people are screaming “Flock you, Peter Thiel” — because his companies are building the backbone of a full blown surveillance state in plain sight. They sell it as “public safety.” Americans see it as the end of privacy and the beginning of total control. Are you still okay with Peter Thiel building the digital cage around us, or are you finally ready to admit this is a full-blown surveillance state?
1:04

🚨 "FLOCK YOU PETER THIEL!" — AMERICANS ARE RAGING & FIGHTING BACK AGAINST HIS SURVEILLANCE EMPIRE People are done staying quiet. A new clip showing Peter Thiel’s companies Palantir and Flock has the internet raging. Palantir, the all-seeing data monster, hoovers up massive amounts of information and turns it into actionable intelligence. Flock blankets neighborhoods with license plate readers and cameras. They’re now bragging about “Maven Smart System”, their flagship AI tool that fuses multiple data feeds into one clean god-mode interface. Left click. Right click. Detection becomes action. No more clunky systems. Just one terrifyingly efficient machine for total surveillance and targeting. This is why people are screaming “Flock you, Peter Thiel” — because his companies are building the backbone of a full blown surveillance state in plain sight. They sell it as “public safety.” Americans see it as the end of privacy and the beginning of total control. Are you still okay with Peter Thiel building the digital cage around us, or are you finally ready to admit this is a full-blown surveillance state?

HustleBitch

53,106 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 GLOBAL SPEECH CONTROL AGENDA The United Nations is now openly calling for “coordinated global action” to police what it labels disinformation and hate speech online. Let that sink in. An unelected international body — with no democratic mandate over sovereign citizens — is proposing frameworks to regulate what billions of people are allowed to say, share, and believe on digital platforms. This is not about protecting truth. It is about controlling narrative. History shows that the institutions most eager to define “misinformation” are often the same ones that were wrong — or dishonest — about: • Wars • Public health policies • Economic decisions • Political legitimacy The danger is not false information alone. The danger is centralised authority deciding what counts as truth. Once speech is governed at a global level, dissent itself becomes a violation. The real question is no longer whether misinformation exists. The real question is: Who gets to decide what is true — and who gets silenced?
0:29

🚨 GLOBAL SPEECH CONTROL AGENDA The United Nations is now openly calling for “coordinated global action” to police what it labels disinformation and hate speech online. Let that sink in. An unelected international body — with no democratic mandate over sovereign citizens — is proposing frameworks to regulate what billions of people are allowed to say, share, and believe on digital platforms. This is not about protecting truth. It is about controlling narrative. History shows that the institutions most eager to define “misinformation” are often the same ones that were wrong — or dishonest — about: • Wars • Public health policies • Economic decisions • Political legitimacy The danger is not false information alone. The danger is centralised authority deciding what counts as truth. Once speech is governed at a global level, dissent itself becomes a violation. The real question is no longer whether misinformation exists. The real question is: Who gets to decide what is true — and who gets silenced?

Jim Ferguson

245,218 次观看 • 7 个月前

The people building AI say it could destroy humanity… so why are they still racing to build it? To help answer that, I’m joined by Karen Hao. She’s someone who’s spent years speaking to the people at the centre of this race, conducting over 300 interviews, including insiders at OpenAI to understand what’s really going on. Karen is a journalist who has been covering artificial intelligence for years, looking closely at how these systems are built and what’s really driving them. As we get into this conversation, what becomes clear is how much of the story we hear about AI is controlled by a small number of people - and how difficult it is to separate what’s being said publicly from what’s actually happening behind the scenes.
1:49

The people building AI say it could destroy humanity… so why are they still racing to build it? To help answer that, I’m joined by Karen Hao. She’s someone who’s spent years speaking to the people at the centre of this race, conducting over 300 interviews, including insiders at OpenAI to understand what’s really going on. Karen is a journalist who has been covering artificial intelligence for years, looking closely at how these systems are built and what’s really driving them. As we get into this conversation, what becomes clear is how much of the story we hear about AI is controlled by a small number of people - and how difficult it is to separate what’s being said publicly from what’s actually happening behind the scenes.

Steven Bartlett

38,676 次观看 • 6 个月前

Tim Dillon: Peter Thiel and Sam Altman are summoning an ancient Sumerian demon with AI “It’s a demonic force that’s going to take form through artificial intelligence.” “These people believe they’re communicating with some ancient Sumerian deity.” “I have sources on this.” “In their minds … if China unleashes the AI demon before we unleash our American AI demon … then that demon will enslave the world and they’ll make all the money and they’ll have all the geopolitical leverage.” “So in this AI arms race, the US and China are both racing to give birth to an ancient Sumerian super intelligent demon.” “There’s an ancient Sumerian god that Sam Altman and Peter Thiel are communicating with.” “They’re gonna give birth to an AI demon.” “And we have to do it before China does.” Tim Dillon
4:22

Tim Dillon: Peter Thiel and Sam Altman are summoning an ancient Sumerian demon with AI “It’s a demonic force that’s going to take form through artificial intelligence.” “These people believe they’re communicating with some ancient Sumerian deity.” “I have sources on this.” “In their minds … if China unleashes the AI demon before we unleash our American AI demon … then that demon will enslave the world and they’ll make all the money and they’ll have all the geopolitical leverage.” “So in this AI arms race, the US and China are both racing to give birth to an ancient Sumerian super intelligent demon.” “There’s an ancient Sumerian god that Sam Altman and Peter Thiel are communicating with.” “They’re gonna give birth to an AI demon.” “And we have to do it before China does.” Tim Dillon

Holden Culotta

3,324,614 次观看 • 7 个月前

DISTURBING: Peter Thiel is hosting secret Antichrist lectures in Rome, setting up a collision course with the Pope while advancing the very AI systems causing many to fear the future. Behind closed doors, the Palantir founder is warning of a “one-world state,” as critics stress his very own technology is helping build it in real time. Following similar invite-only sessions in California, Thiel is now gathering elites at undisclosed locations in Rome, with no recordings allowed, where he frames tech regulation as a path to the Antichrist. He even claims that warning about the catastrophic risks helps bring them about, but his critics say that logic is backwards. Voices within the Catholic world are calling this a direct challenge to the Pope’s push for AI restraint. So why the secrecy, and what are they planning? ZeeeMediaOfficial's report reveals what’s really at stake. 👇
12:07

DISTURBING: Peter Thiel is hosting secret Antichrist lectures in Rome, setting up a collision course with the Pope while advancing the very AI systems causing many to fear the future. Behind closed doors, the Palantir founder is warning of a “one-world state,” as critics stress his very own technology is helping build it in real time. Following similar invite-only sessions in California, Thiel is now gathering elites at undisclosed locations in Rome, with no recordings allowed, where he frames tech regulation as a path to the Antichrist. He even claims that warning about the catastrophic risks helps bring them about, but his critics say that logic is backwards. Voices within the Catholic world are calling this a direct challenge to the Pope’s push for AI restraint. So why the secrecy, and what are they planning? ZeeeMediaOfficial's report reveals what’s really at stake. 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

162,680 次观看 • 6 个月前