Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Phang: Zuckerberg was forced to testify. And during that testimony, he basically said, “We do a really good job of maintaining a strong safety record on Instagram.’” He also said, “We think it’s terrible, but it’s hard to keep young people off these apps.” But here’s what really did... show more

Acyn

746,613 subscribers

292,223 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Gesundheit & Wellness Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Mark Zuckerberg on Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter Elon Musk famously reduced head count by 80% after acquiring Twitter. It was controversial at the time, but Mark is asked what he thinks Elon did well during it. Mark responds: “You can agree or disagree with the exact tactics and how he did that. Every leader has their own style… But a lot of the specific principles that he pushed on: making the organization more technical, decreasing distance between engineers at the company and him, fewer layers of management. I think that those were generally good changes.” Mark also believes this was good for the technology industry as a whole: “My sense is that there were a lot of other people who thought that those were good changes, but who may have been a little shy about doing them. Just in my conversations with other founders and how people have reacted to the things we’ve done… When people see what Elon is doing, I think that gives people the ability to think through how to shape their organizations in a way that can be good for the industry and make all these companies more productive over time.” He continues: “So I think that was one thing where he was quite ahead of a bunch of the other companies on… And from the outside, it’s very hard to know. Did he cut too much? Did he not cut enough? I don’t think it’s my place to opine on that… But certainly his actions led me and, I think, a lot of other folks in the industry to think about, ‘Hey, are we doing this as much as we should? Could we make our companies better by pushing on some of these same principles?’” Video source: Lex Fridman (2023)

Mark Zuckerberg on Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter Elon Musk famously reduced head count by 80% after acquiring Twitter. It was controversial at the time, but Mark is asked what he thinks Elon did well during it. Mark responds: “You can agree or disagree with the exact tactics and how he did that. Every leader has their own style… But a lot of the specific principles that he pushed on: making the organization more technical, decreasing distance between engineers at the company and him, fewer layers of management. I think that those were generally good changes.” Mark also believes this was good for the technology industry as a whole: “My sense is that there were a lot of other people who thought that those were good changes, but who may have been a little shy about doing them. Just in my conversations with other founders and how people have reacted to the things we’ve done… When people see what Elon is doing, I think that gives people the ability to think through how to shape their organizations in a way that can be good for the industry and make all these companies more productive over time.” He continues: “So I think that was one thing where he was quite ahead of a bunch of the other companies on… And from the outside, it’s very hard to know. Did he cut too much? Did he not cut enough? I don’t think it’s my place to opine on that… But certainly his actions led me and, I think, a lot of other folks in the industry to think about, ‘Hey, are we doing this as much as we should? Could we make our companies better by pushing on some of these same principles?’” Video source: Lex Fridman (2023)

Startup Archive

522,371 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The big issue in Sean "Diddy" Combs' appeal of his convictions and 50-month prison sentence is whether Judge Arun Subramanian wrongly increased the sentence because of fraud and coercion that shouldn't have been considered under a new sentencing guideline that prohibits judges from factoring in acquitted conduct. Subramanian said when sentencing Combs last October that the fraud and coercion enhancement was based on conduct related to Combs' convictions for transportation for prostitution, instead of only relating to his acquittals for racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion. A three-judge panel at the 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals heard argument on Thursday (April 9) in New York City. Combs' lawyer Alexandra Shapiro argued Judge Subramanian cited incidents that aren't actually connected to prostitution, including Combs threatening to release sexually explicit videos of Casandra "Cassie" Ventura during a flight home from the Cannes Film Festival. "There's no evidence that, even on the airplane, they were planning a so-called freak off. And moreover, there was no evidence in the record that there was a freak off other than Ms. Ventura's testimony," Shapiro said. "Wait, wait a minute. Pause, pause, pause. You just said there was no evidence other than a witness's testimony? Which is another way of saying there was trial evidence," said Judge William J. Nardini, a 2019 Donald Trump appointee. Shapiro said "not only was this argued to the jury in the summation, but the jury sent back a note asking for quote, 'Casandra Ventura testimony regarding Cannes and the events immediately following.'" "And we know that the jury rejected the notion ... that there was coercion and connection with that incident," Shapiro said. Nardini said he thought Shapiro was "just arguing a different thing, that the defendant did not have an intent for purposes of the Mann Act ... because then you were saying there was no evidence that a freak off even happened." The judge said Shaprio's argument is going beyond lack of coercion to "now you're saying they also found that none of this even happened. And I don't see how that follows." "That's not what I said," Shapiro said. "Well, you said there was no evidence that the freak off happened, except for Ventura's testimony. And then you were trying to argue the jury necessarily rejected Ventura's testimony. And I guess you're saying, because they rejected the argument of the government, that it was her testimony showed there was coercion, they must have rejected every single thing that Ventura said," the judge said. "That's not what I said," Shapiro said again. "Well, that was the implication. So let's back up," Nardini said. "Well that's not what I meant to imply," Shapiro said. "The whole Mann Act charges were basically an afterthought at this trial. They took up almost no time. The government relied principally on these two charts. And if you look at government exhibit 1402," Shapiro said as Nardini interjected. "I understand that, and you made that point very well in your brief. So isn't your argument really that what the government is doing here is mixing and matching. You're taking evidence from the claims that were acquitted to try to support the the Mann Act sentencing for purposes of the Mann Act, but none of that was presented to the jury for purposes of the Mann Act. Is that a summation of what, where —" Nardini said. "That's fair," Shapiro said. The judges have not yet issued their ruling. It could be at least a few weeks.

The big issue in Sean "Diddy" Combs' appeal of his convictions and 50-month prison sentence is whether Judge Arun Subramanian wrongly increased the sentence because of fraud and coercion that shouldn't have been considered under a new sentencing guideline that prohibits judges from factoring in acquitted conduct. Subramanian said when sentencing Combs last October that the fraud and coercion enhancement was based on conduct related to Combs' convictions for transportation for prostitution, instead of only relating to his acquittals for racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion. A three-judge panel at the 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals heard argument on Thursday (April 9) in New York City. Combs' lawyer Alexandra Shapiro argued Judge Subramanian cited incidents that aren't actually connected to prostitution, including Combs threatening to release sexually explicit videos of Casandra "Cassie" Ventura during a flight home from the Cannes Film Festival. "There's no evidence that, even on the airplane, they were planning a so-called freak off. And moreover, there was no evidence in the record that there was a freak off other than Ms. Ventura's testimony," Shapiro said. "Wait, wait a minute. Pause, pause, pause. You just said there was no evidence other than a witness's testimony? Which is another way of saying there was trial evidence," said Judge William J. Nardini, a 2019 Donald Trump appointee. Shapiro said "not only was this argued to the jury in the summation, but the jury sent back a note asking for quote, 'Casandra Ventura testimony regarding Cannes and the events immediately following.'" "And we know that the jury rejected the notion ... that there was coercion and connection with that incident," Shapiro said. Nardini said he thought Shapiro was "just arguing a different thing, that the defendant did not have an intent for purposes of the Mann Act ... because then you were saying there was no evidence that a freak off even happened." The judge said Shaprio's argument is going beyond lack of coercion to "now you're saying they also found that none of this even happened. And I don't see how that follows." "That's not what I said," Shapiro said. "Well, you said there was no evidence that the freak off happened, except for Ventura's testimony. And then you were trying to argue the jury necessarily rejected Ventura's testimony. And I guess you're saying, because they rejected the argument of the government, that it was her testimony showed there was coercion, they must have rejected every single thing that Ventura said," the judge said. "That's not what I said," Shapiro said again. "Well, that was the implication. So let's back up," Nardini said. "Well that's not what I meant to imply," Shapiro said. "The whole Mann Act charges were basically an afterthought at this trial. They took up almost no time. The government relied principally on these two charts. And if you look at government exhibit 1402," Shapiro said as Nardini interjected. "I understand that, and you made that point very well in your brief. So isn't your argument really that what the government is doing here is mixing and matching. You're taking evidence from the claims that were acquitted to try to support the the Mann Act sentencing for purposes of the Mann Act, but none of that was presented to the jury for purposes of the Mann Act. Is that a summation of what, where —" Nardini said. "That's fair," Shapiro said. The judges have not yet issued their ruling. It could be at least a few weeks.

Meghann Cuniff

61,031 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Chanyeol said he really tried his best to memorize the lyrics to the Vietnamese song but when he monitored his performance, he saw that he kept looking at the prompter while singing. He really did his best to memorize it but it was really hard. He will also do it in Manila. And he'll do his best to study the lyrics but if he will keep looking at the prompter again, he hopes we will understand 🥹

Chanyeol said he really tried his best to memorize the lyrics to the Vietnamese song but when he monitored his performance, he saw that he kept looking at the prompter while singing. He really did his best to memorize it but it was really hard. He will also do it in Manila. And he'll do his best to study the lyrics but if he will keep looking at the prompter again, he hopes we will understand 🥹

NLNL 🍒🔥

31,297 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins: “You said that it’s up to Congress if the president’s face is on a $250 bill. But it is actually — The Washington Post that’s reporting two political appointees from the Treasury Department who have asked agencies to be ready to — to do that. Do you think politically, it’s a good idea to put his face on a $250 bill when people are struggling to afford gas and groceries?” Treasury Secretary Bessent: “You know, I don’t really understand this Washington Post article that — who here’s from The Post? Yeah. Terribly written, terribly edited. Because basically what it says is that Treasury is following the law and that we created the bill and that it’s up to Congress, but that — we follow the bill and it’s up to — I didn’t really understand what the story was.” Bessent: “So — anyway —” Collins: “So, these two political appointees aren’t involved in that? Two of your political appointees?” Bessent: “Yeah, of course, but we — we prepare for everything. If it gets passed, just like we — we were ready six months in advance of the one big, beautiful bill for tax guidance that. So, we have to prepare in advance. You can’t draw something up the day before.” Collins: “But, politically, do you think it’s a good idea, though, when people are struggling to afford gas and groceries?” Bessent: “Look, I think it has — I think that it’s bifurcated. That — do you think we should have a 250th anniversary — the celebration?” Collins: “Well, that’s happening anyway, but putting the President’s face on a $250 bill —” Bessent: “No, no, no, no, no, no, no.” Collins: “— is a choice.” Bessent: “But Kaitlin, it’s not happening anyway. It’s happening because it’s being funded by private citizens, by the federal government, by state governments, by municipal governments to celebrate our country, and I don’t think that there’s anything untoward about having the President of the United States — the person who was President of United States on the 250th anniversary bill.”

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins: “You said that it’s up to Congress if the president’s face is on a $250 bill. But it is actually — The Washington Post that’s reporting two political appointees from the Treasury Department who have asked agencies to be ready to — to do that. Do you think politically, it’s a good idea to put his face on a $250 bill when people are struggling to afford gas and groceries?” Treasury Secretary Bessent: “You know, I don’t really understand this Washington Post article that — who here’s from The Post? Yeah. Terribly written, terribly edited. Because basically what it says is that Treasury is following the law and that we created the bill and that it’s up to Congress, but that — we follow the bill and it’s up to — I didn’t really understand what the story was.” Bessent: “So — anyway —” Collins: “So, these two political appointees aren’t involved in that? Two of your political appointees?” Bessent: “Yeah, of course, but we — we prepare for everything. If it gets passed, just like we — we were ready six months in advance of the one big, beautiful bill for tax guidance that. So, we have to prepare in advance. You can’t draw something up the day before.” Collins: “But, politically, do you think it’s a good idea, though, when people are struggling to afford gas and groceries?” Bessent: “Look, I think it has — I think that it’s bifurcated. That — do you think we should have a 250th anniversary — the celebration?” Collins: “Well, that’s happening anyway, but putting the President’s face on a $250 bill —” Bessent: “No, no, no, no, no, no, no.” Collins: “— is a choice.” Bessent: “But Kaitlin, it’s not happening anyway. It’s happening because it’s being funded by private citizens, by the federal government, by state governments, by municipal governments to celebrate our country, and I don’t think that there’s anything untoward about having the President of the United States — the person who was President of United States on the 250th anniversary bill.”

Curtis Houck

32,387 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Oversight Democrats say Howard Lutnick lied during his testimony on Epstein. Walkinshaw: What we heard was hours of testimony where Lutnick was attempting to redefine the meaning of the word “I.” He claims that when he said, “I would never be in a room again with Jeffrey Epstein,” he meant only him and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein was so gross to him that he wasn’t willing to be in a room with him, but he was perfectly OK with his wife and family being in a room with Epstein. He’s lying. The American people deserve to see the sweat on his brow as he struggles to answer basic questions about his lies to the American people.

Oversight Democrats say Howard Lutnick lied during his testimony on Epstein. Walkinshaw: What we heard was hours of testimony where Lutnick was attempting to redefine the meaning of the word “I.” He claims that when he said, “I would never be in a room again with Jeffrey Epstein,” he meant only him and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein was so gross to him that he wasn’t willing to be in a room with him, but he was perfectly OK with his wife and family being in a room with Epstein. He’s lying. The American people deserve to see the sweat on his brow as he struggles to answer basic questions about his lies to the American people.

Acyn

455,934 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

MacFarlane: What did you make of the president saying he loves inflation? Welch: It’s pretty bizarre. He does not get what’s happening with everyday people. This is happening because of the war. He made a unilateral decision to go to war. He said yes to Netanyahu, and he said no to his own advisers. He’s flailing, and there are no negotiations. It’s really about the president trying to get a face-saving outcome so he can make the assertion that we’re better off, but we’re nowhere.

MacFarlane: What did you make of the president saying he loves inflation? Welch: It’s pretty bizarre. He does not get what’s happening with everyday people. This is happening because of the war. He made a unilateral decision to go to war. He said yes to Netanyahu, and he said no to his own advisers. He’s flailing, and there are no negotiations. It’s really about the president trying to get a face-saving outcome so he can make the assertion that we’re better off, but we’re nowhere.

Acyn

380,635 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🇺🇸DAVID SACKS: WHEN THE VP DELIVERED A SPEECH ON AI OPPORTUNITY, IT WAS LIKE A SHOT ACROSS THE BOW! “I think that the vice president—you knew he was going to deliver an important speech as soon as he got up there and said, "I'm here to talk about not AI safety, but AI opportunity." To understand what a bracing statement that was, and really almost like a shot across the bow, you have to understand the history and context of these events. For the last couple of years, these events have been exclusively focused on AI safety.” Source: The All-In Podcast David Sacks

🇺🇸DAVID SACKS: WHEN THE VP DELIVERED A SPEECH ON AI OPPORTUNITY, IT WAS LIKE A SHOT ACROSS THE BOW! “I think that the vice president—you knew he was going to deliver an important speech as soon as he got up there and said, "I'm here to talk about not AI safety, but AI opportunity." To understand what a bracing statement that was, and really almost like a shot across the bow, you have to understand the history and context of these events. For the last couple of years, these events have been exclusively focused on AI safety.” Source: The All-In Podcast David Sacks

Mario Nawfal

273,952 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Vice President Vance completely SHUTS DOWN Ana Navarro on The View when she tried to claim that President Trump “loves” inflation. As soon as she said it, Vance was right next to her to set the record straight and provide the context. NAVARRO: “He just said he loves the inflation...” VANCE: “What he said Ana, what he said, is that he loves the fact that the inflation is going to come down when this war is over.” “That’s what he said.” GOLDBERG: “That’s not what he said.” BEHAR: “Wait, are you his interpreter or are you his vice president?” VANCE: “Look, what the president said...people were asking about the inflation. They were asking about the affordability problem, which again, is very real.” “And what he said I love the inflation because it’s going to come down when the war is over.” “Now, again we already see gas prices today, $4.06 a gallon. Too high. But WAY down from where they were a couple weeks ago.” “There’s a lot we gotta do, but I think that we’re doing as much as we can.” “We’re going to keep on working at it, and again, the American people are going to make their verdict.” “But I think we have a very credible case to run on that we brought a lot of new investment. We’re building the factories, that is going to pay serious dividends for the American people over the long haul.”

Vice President Vance completely SHUTS DOWN Ana Navarro on The View when she tried to claim that President Trump “loves” inflation. As soon as she said it, Vance was right next to her to set the record straight and provide the context. NAVARRO: “He just said he loves the inflation...” VANCE: “What he said Ana, what he said, is that he loves the fact that the inflation is going to come down when this war is over.” “That’s what he said.” GOLDBERG: “That’s not what he said.” BEHAR: “Wait, are you his interpreter or are you his vice president?” VANCE: “Look, what the president said...people were asking about the inflation. They were asking about the affordability problem, which again, is very real.” “And what he said I love the inflation because it’s going to come down when the war is over.” “Now, again we already see gas prices today, $4.06 a gallon. Too high. But WAY down from where they were a couple weeks ago.” “There’s a lot we gotta do, but I think that we’re doing as much as we can.” “We’re going to keep on working at it, and again, the American people are going to make their verdict.” “But I think we have a very credible case to run on that we brought a lot of new investment. We’re building the factories, that is going to pay serious dividends for the American people over the long haul.”

Overton

45,165 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

This is by far one of the best interviews from Bruce Flatt, Brookfield’s CEO. During the interview, the reporter asked him if we are in a bubble and he immediately broke character, saying we are not. He explained that the majority of these companies have better credit ratings than most countries, plenty of cash, and are making long-term investments. It’s not a job for everyone, and it’s not easy to do. Bruce also said we’re going to need all the power we can get, and energy consumption is expected to double over the next 15 years Bruce rarely shows emotion, but this time he decided to break character

This is by far one of the best interviews from Bruce Flatt, Brookfield’s CEO. During the interview, the reporter asked him if we are in a bubble and he immediately broke character, saying we are not. He explained that the majority of these companies have better credit ratings than most countries, plenty of cash, and are making long-term investments. It’s not a job for everyone, and it’s not easy to do. Bruce also said we’re going to need all the power we can get, and energy consumption is expected to double over the next 15 years Bruce rarely shows emotion, but this time he decided to break character

Bourbon Capital

327,795 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

soobin said that when he used to work out before, his goal was to make his body thick & buff because he’s really skinny and he also wanted the fit of his clothes to look cooler but during his long break this time, he rewatched a lot of videos from debut till now and he doesn’t remember when exactly but during ‘the killa’ he wore a really tight outfit and his arms were really pumped at the time so he looked really rough and big…but he didn’t think that looked good on him. he said that off-stage, he thought he had a good body and it looked cool but he doesn’t think it looked good with the idol outfits they’d wear on stage and that made his dance moves look less complete and heavy so when he started working out again this time, he told them that he wants to maintain his size while making only his frame grow wider: 🐰 they told me not to say ridiculous things 🐿️ that is kinda a ridiculous thing to say…it’s like saying you want to lose weight on only your face but taehyun said that he understands exactly what soobin is saying because soobin’s arms grow really quickly and arms are what make people look buffer and if it’s a short-sleeved shirt or a tank top it looks even more like that; soobin said that although he’s been working out 4-5 days a week lately, his goal is to not get bigger but still make his body better!

soobin said that when he used to work out before, his goal was to make his body thick & buff because he’s really skinny and he also wanted the fit of his clothes to look cooler but during his long break this time, he rewatched a lot of videos from debut till now and he doesn’t remember when exactly but during ‘the killa’ he wore a really tight outfit and his arms were really pumped at the time so he looked really rough and big…but he didn’t think that looked good on him. he said that off-stage, he thought he had a good body and it looked cool but he doesn’t think it looked good with the idol outfits they’d wear on stage and that made his dance moves look less complete and heavy so when he started working out again this time, he told them that he wants to maintain his size while making only his frame grow wider: 🐰 they told me not to say ridiculous things 🐿️ that is kinda a ridiculous thing to say…it’s like saying you want to lose weight on only your face but taehyun said that he understands exactly what soobin is saying because soobin’s arms grow really quickly and arms are what make people look buffer and if it’s a short-sleeved shirt or a tank top it looks even more like that; soobin said that although he’s been working out 4-5 days a week lately, his goal is to not get bigger but still make his body better!

💬

80,263 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

jl’s tmi on their acon 2025 experience with sb19: during acon, he was just *speechless*. he kept telling juwon that he hopes time would fly faster (so they can meet sb19 faster). “in philippines, i went to a lot sb19’s events but we never had the chance to share a stage, so this time i was really *happy*. i also went to their fancon in the ph once, they were really really good. an inspiration. so good.” juwon said jl got “성덕” (success as a fan) because he was just once a fan, but now also an idol that can communicate with their idol, also take photos, do challenges. jl sad there’s a lot he wants to say. when he found out sb19 was going to acon, he tried his best to make connections (probably to make sure they’ll interact) and luckily they said okay. as soon as they met, sb19 weren’t like “seniors”. they were friends, big brothers. they were so nice and kind (juwon and woongki agree). sb19 also talked to them a lot so it wasn’t awkward at all. when we were doing the dc, they (and the staff) were cheering for us so loud. jl also said there were a lot of filipinos, in the place they ate, in the hallways and even all of sb19’s staff. juwon said it was comforting for jl, and refreshing for him. jl said “these people.. they look like me! there were so many filipino and it’s been a while since i’ve been to philippines so i really loved it.” he also said it’s been a while since he spoke tagalog and juwon said when they met sb19, he struggled speaking tagalog 😆 jl said he got confused because he uses 3 languages. #아홉 #AHOF AHOF #SB19 SB19 Official

jl’s tmi on their acon 2025 experience with sb19: during acon, he was just speechless. he kept telling juwon that he hopes time would fly faster (so they can meet sb19 faster). “in philippines, i went to a lot sb19’s events but we never had the chance to share a stage, so this time i was really happy. i also went to their fancon in the ph once, they were really really good. an inspiration. so good.” juwon said jl got “성덕” (success as a fan) because he was just once a fan, but now also an idol that can communicate with their idol, also take photos, do challenges. jl sad there’s a lot he wants to say. when he found out sb19 was going to acon, he tried his best to make connections (probably to make sure they’ll interact) and luckily they said okay. as soon as they met, sb19 weren’t like “seniors”. they were friends, big brothers. they were so nice and kind (juwon and woongki agree). sb19 also talked to them a lot so it wasn’t awkward at all. when we were doing the dc, they (and the staff) were cheering for us so loud. jl also said there were a lot of filipinos, in the place they ate, in the hallways and even all of sb19’s staff. juwon said it was comforting for jl, and refreshing for him. jl said “these people.. they look like me! there were so many filipino and it’s been a while since i’ve been to philippines so i really loved it.” he also said it’s been a while since he spoke tagalog and juwon said when they met sb19, he struggled speaking tagalog 😆 jl said he got confused because he uses 3 languages. #아홉 #AHOF AHOF #SB19 SB19 Official

eljey .ᐟ

72,473 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Neguse on Noem: Clearly the president was embarrassed by the corruption and the fraud — the self-dealing that we exposed during the course of this hearing. But I also think he was perhaps envious of it. I will also say that this was the first step, not the last step. There’s more work for us to do here in the coming days and weeks because there’s a lot more to find out in terms of who made money off these deals.

Neguse on Noem: Clearly the president was embarrassed by the corruption and the fraud — the self-dealing that we exposed during the course of this hearing. But I also think he was perhaps envious of it. I will also say that this was the first step, not the last step. There’s more work for us to do here in the coming days and weeks because there’s a lot more to find out in terms of who made money off these deals.

Acyn

38,357 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

JT, founder of Fake Taxi, explains why he launched a coin on Zora. “My son fat fingered the coin. We didn’t mean to launch it, but we did, and I’m very pleased we launched it on Zora. I also really like Base, I think it’s a good chain, and it’s just full of really great people.”

JT, founder of Fake Taxi, explains why he launched a coin on Zora. “My son fat fingered the coin. We didn’t mean to launch it, but we did, and I’m very pleased we launched it on Zora. I also really like Base, I think it’s a good chain, and it’s just full of really great people.”

11AM w/ Seed Club

51,201 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Someone commented that yeosang was coaching hard from behind during the pepero game and yeosang said that the ending (fairy) was on the line and that he also feels determined to win when it’s a team record that’s being set. He said that if he has been the one doing it, he really wouldn’t have been able to beat the record, so he’s very thankful to wooyoung and yunho. Then someone else commented that if yeosang had done it, there would have been 5cm left instead of 0.5 and he laughed agreeing 😭

Someone commented that yeosang was coaching hard from behind during the pepero game and yeosang said that the ending (fairy) was on the line and that he also feels determined to win when it’s a team record that’s being set. He said that if he has been the one doing it, he really wouldn’t have been able to beat the record, so he’s very thankful to wooyoung and yunho. Then someone else commented that if yeosang had done it, there would have been 5cm left instead of 0.5 and he laughed agreeing 😭

YEOSANG GLOBAL

49,159 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Trump praises France's Macron: Macron did a great job of hosting the G7. Really good. No games. He invited me about a week before. He said, “Would you do me a favor? Would you come to Paris? We'd like to honor you.” I viewed it as honoring the nation. But he said, “I'd like to honor you.” And he had some of the biggest people in Europe there and beyond. We were at Versailles, and I was sort of not going to do it, but he knew my weakness. They don't do dinners at Versailles. And we had a fantastic dinner. Source: Axios

Trump praises France's Macron: Macron did a great job of hosting the G7. Really good. No games. He invited me about a week before. He said, “Would you do me a favor? Would you come to Paris? We'd like to honor you.” I viewed it as honoring the nation. But he said, “I'd like to honor you.” And he had some of the biggest people in Europe there and beyond. We were at Versailles, and I was sort of not going to do it, but he knew my weakness. They don't do dinners at Versailles. And we had a fantastic dinner. Source: Axios

Clash Report

1,199,572 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Inspired talking about Skewmond and" the best jungler in the west" debate Q: Everyone was talking a lot of Skewmond, and I would like to know about: do you believe like the series put an end to any debate about the best jungler in the West? Inspired: To me, there was never a debate. I knew that I’m always the best, but I think Skewmond is a good player. I wouldn’t say that he had any phenomenal series, though, this tournament. I think he, against T1, he still made a lot of mistakes. When he was stronger, he didn’t really try to fight enemies, and or sometimes just over committed a bit, and I think G2 won against T1 just by waiting for T1 to make mistakes. I think today, I think Skewmond played well in the team fights. I think every time he was on my screen and we’re like skirmishing and team fighting, I think he did a good job. But I think just like team wise, and like how they all played together as a team and use their jungler was wrong. And it’s hard to say, as I always said, that don’t really know who’s there like which jungler is good because you don’t really know what was his idea beyond the game plan, what his teammates wanted to do. But it just seems like they were not connected well enough, and on top of that, as I said, I think the drafts were not that great. So yeah, I think he’s a good player, but I think they need to work more on team synergy in order to actually pressure when they’re strong if they want to be like the best in the world, because I think they definitely can, but need to work a bit more. Source:

Inspired talking about Skewmond and" the best jungler in the west" debate Q: Everyone was talking a lot of Skewmond, and I would like to know about: do you believe like the series put an end to any debate about the best jungler in the West? Inspired: To me, there was never a debate. I knew that I’m always the best, but I think Skewmond is a good player. I wouldn’t say that he had any phenomenal series, though, this tournament. I think he, against T1, he still made a lot of mistakes. When he was stronger, he didn’t really try to fight enemies, and or sometimes just over committed a bit, and I think G2 won against T1 just by waiting for T1 to make mistakes. I think today, I think Skewmond played well in the team fights. I think every time he was on my screen and we’re like skirmishing and team fighting, I think he did a good job. But I think just like team wise, and like how they all played together as a team and use their jungler was wrong. And it’s hard to say, as I always said, that don’t really know who’s there like which jungler is good because you don’t really know what was his idea beyond the game plan, what his teammates wanted to do. But it just seems like they were not connected well enough, and on top of that, as I said, I think the drafts were not that great. So yeah, I think he’s a good player, but I think they need to work more on team synergy in order to actually pressure when they’re strong if they want to be like the best in the world, because I think they definitely can, but need to work a bit more. Source:

Yujin Ha

110,072 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Whoopi: I keep laughing because I think you don't recognize excellence and creativity when you see it. Do you know how creative that was? What he did. Alyssa: The production alone. Unbelievable. Whoopi: I mean, come on, man. He [Trump] was upset. He said no one would understand what was being said. You didn't understand. A lot of people didn't. Sunny: You didn't have to understand or speak Spanish to feel the joy, the unity, and the message of inclusivity that was there. 🤣🤣🤣 How are these nutballs still on the air?

Whoopi: I keep laughing because I think you don't recognize excellence and creativity when you see it. Do you know how creative that was? What he did. Alyssa: The production alone. Unbelievable. Whoopi: I mean, come on, man. He [Trump] was upset. He said no one would understand what was being said. You didn't understand. A lot of people didn't. Sunny: You didn't have to understand or speak Spanish to feel the joy, the unity, and the message of inclusivity that was there. 🤣🤣🤣 How are these nutballs still on the air?

Sadie

158,578 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Kim: I'm just sick and tired of this administration hiding behind these classified briefings. The vast majority of what I hear in these classified briefings can be said publicly, but they intentionally do this to as a tactic to be able to prevent the American people from hearing and questioning what it is that they're doing. Because they know that the American people do not want a war

Kim: I'm just sick and tired of this administration hiding behind these classified briefings. The vast majority of what I hear in these classified briefings can be said publicly, but they intentionally do this to as a tactic to be able to prevent the American people from hearing and questioning what it is that they're doing. Because they know that the American people do not want a war

Acyn

104,416 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten