Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Phiagate, explained in horse terms You go from HorseReviews dotcom over to ClydesdalesDirect dotcom. You have Phia installed as an extension. You buy a stunning Clydesdale from the website using its online shopping features, knowing that this particular horse breed — large and powerful, with an arched neck, high...

tbpn's profile picture

TBPN

1,330,346 subscribers

181,260 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииФинансыОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

After buying broadcast dotcom for $8,000 in 1997, Mark Cuban went on a domain name buying spree when he realized he could use simple URLs to route traffic to the site. As a result, he says he now owns democracy dotcom, baseball dotcom, mrpresident dotcom, sandwich dotcom, finalfour dotcom, and more. "You name it, I've bought it."
1:52

After buying broadcast dotcom for $8,000 in 1997, Mark Cuban went on a domain name buying spree when he realized he could use simple URLs to route traffic to the site. As a result, he says he now owns democracy dotcom, baseball dotcom, mrpresident dotcom, sandwich dotcom, finalfour dotcom, and more. "You name it, I've bought it."

TBPN

354,662 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨KIM DOTCOM IS A LEGEND 🚨Watch: ENJOY 🚨TUCKER: How is the war in Ukraine resolved? What does that look like? 🚨KIM DOTCOM: On, it looks like now on the battlefield, you know. So Russia will win against Ukraine, and, I don't think there will be a settlement. No. 🚨TUCKER: Do you believe that NATO will continue to attack Russia? KIM DOTCOM: I think, the attacks on Russia will continue for many years. I don't see the US and, Europe giving up. So, I think what Russia has to prepare for is a bigger war. TUCKER: A bigger war with United... directly with the United States and Europe? KIM DOTCOM: With Europe, yeah. TUCKER: You think that this will evolve or devolve into a direct conflict between NATO and Russia where Russia is hitting Europe, Europe is hitting Russia? KIM DOTCOM: Yeah. I think so. TUCKER: And who wins? KIM DOTCOM: Russia, of course, because Europe has no, armies. You know, NATO is a toothless tiger. Yeah. TUCKER: Why would the Western powers, why would NATO want a war with Russia? I've never understood that. KIM DOTCOM: Their alternative is the US loses, and if the US loses, it will go down. You know, the West has invested a lot in, US. So all the debt is,owned by debtors. Europe is a big debtor to the United States. So if the US stock markets, for example, all the European companies that are go down, all the European companies that are listed in the US are also going down. So we, we are talking about a loss of maybe trillions, you know. It's not something that the West, can do. They want to, prevent the US from going under. TUCKER: I think, I understand that, and I'd like to see the US not go under also, but I think they're accelerating the destruction of the United States. This is having the opposite effect. If you wanted to wreck the US and bring the empire to its knees in the most humiliating, painful, expensive way, this is what you would do. KIM DOTCOM: Yeah, but, the debt has now reached levels that are unsustainable. So it's just a matter of time. You know, to run the US government costs 20 billion a day. It's impossible. TUCKER: It's impossible. That's right.
3:21

🚨KIM DOTCOM IS A LEGEND 🚨Watch: ENJOY 🚨TUCKER: How is the war in Ukraine resolved? What does that look like? 🚨KIM DOTCOM: On, it looks like now on the battlefield, you know. So Russia will win against Ukraine, and, I don't think there will be a settlement. No. 🚨TUCKER: Do you believe that NATO will continue to attack Russia? KIM DOTCOM: I think, the attacks on Russia will continue for many years. I don't see the US and, Europe giving up. So, I think what Russia has to prepare for is a bigger war. TUCKER: A bigger war with United... directly with the United States and Europe? KIM DOTCOM: With Europe, yeah. TUCKER: You think that this will evolve or devolve into a direct conflict between NATO and Russia where Russia is hitting Europe, Europe is hitting Russia? KIM DOTCOM: Yeah. I think so. TUCKER: And who wins? KIM DOTCOM: Russia, of course, because Europe has no, armies. You know, NATO is a toothless tiger. Yeah. TUCKER: Why would the Western powers, why would NATO want a war with Russia? I've never understood that. KIM DOTCOM: Their alternative is the US loses, and if the US loses, it will go down. You know, the West has invested a lot in, US. So all the debt is,owned by debtors. Europe is a big debtor to the United States. So if the US stock markets, for example, all the European companies that are go down, all the European companies that are listed in the US are also going down. So we, we are talking about a loss of maybe trillions, you know. It's not something that the West, can do. They want to, prevent the US from going under. TUCKER: I think, I understand that, and I'd like to see the US not go under also, but I think they're accelerating the destruction of the United States. This is having the opposite effect. If you wanted to wreck the US and bring the empire to its knees in the most humiliating, painful, expensive way, this is what you would do. KIM DOTCOM: Yeah, but, the debt has now reached levels that are unsustainable. So it's just a matter of time. You know, to run the US government costs 20 billion a day. It's impossible. TUCKER: It's impossible. That's right.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

330,195 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

SOMEONE VIBE CODED AN AI THAT REDESIGNS YOUR ROOM USING FURNITURE YOU CAN ACTUALLY GO BUY every other ai interior tool gives you a beautiful render of furniture that doesnt exist you screenshot it, you love it, and then you cant buy a single thing in it this one matches every piece to a real product > upload a photo of your room and pick a style > it redesigns the space and swaps in furniture that actually exists > every item in the render links to somewhere you can order and buy it > the sidebar builds you a full shopping list with the total cost > each piece is priced individually and tagged with the store its from > every item has 3 alternate options, so if you dont like the nightstand you swap it and the render updates > theres a before and after compare toggle, and you can type plain english to change anything in the room > you set your country so it only shows you stores that actually ship to you nobody knows what furniture actually looks like in their own room until its already delivered, and this fixes that
0:41

SOMEONE VIBE CODED AN AI THAT REDESIGNS YOUR ROOM USING FURNITURE YOU CAN ACTUALLY GO BUY every other ai interior tool gives you a beautiful render of furniture that doesnt exist you screenshot it, you love it, and then you cant buy a single thing in it this one matches every piece to a real product > upload a photo of your room and pick a style > it redesigns the space and swaps in furniture that actually exists > every item in the render links to somewhere you can order and buy it > the sidebar builds you a full shopping list with the total cost > each piece is priced individually and tagged with the store its from > every item has 3 alternate options, so if you dont like the nightstand you swap it and the render updates > theres a before and after compare toggle, and you can type plain english to change anything in the room > you set your country so it only shows you stores that actually ship to you nobody knows what furniture actually looks like in their own room until its already delivered, and this fixes that

Om Patel

13,428 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.
0:51

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.

Ms. Malissia

17,098 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

"After this war is over, when millions are dead and the Gulf states are destroyed, you have a lot of loss of life in Iran as well and in Israel as well. And Israel is trying to be the global empire. So it needs labor. So what do you do? Well, you import the labor from India, from China, and from the Philippines." "And what do you do? You microchip them so that you can surveil them. You can control their emotions. You feed them drugs. They're your slaves." "And it can all be done with current technology. You don't have to actually build new technology to do this." "But you will need an AI surveillance state. And that's why Palantir is so valuable."
1:16

"After this war is over, when millions are dead and the Gulf states are destroyed, you have a lot of loss of life in Iran as well and in Israel as well. And Israel is trying to be the global empire. So it needs labor. So what do you do? Well, you import the labor from India, from China, and from the Philippines." "And what do you do? You microchip them so that you can surveil them. You can control their emotions. You feed them drugs. They're your slaves." "And it can all be done with current technology. You don't have to actually build new technology to do this." "But you will need an AI surveillance state. And that's why Palantir is so valuable."

Furkan Gözükara

1,851,610 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

"I don't think many tech companies execute M&A well." Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora breaks down his strategy for successful M&A: "Purchase price is an irrelevant artifact. If it's going to work, it's going to work phenomenally well, or you're going to screw it up. It's not what you paid, it's what you're able to do with it." "You could say that Instagram was expensive, or YouTube was expensive, or DoubleClick was expensive. They all worked perfectly. AOL Time Warner is a different story. So it boils down to how you execute past the price you pay for it." "In tech, when you buy a company, you buy a team, you buy an existing product, and you buy a roadmap for the future. The question is: can you deliver on that roadmap? Can you accelerate that roadmap? Does it work?" "We sign a term sheet, and we ask the founders to sit with our team and redesign the product roadmap so we like it and they like it. And if they don't agree with our expectations and we don't agree with theirs, we don't buy the company." "We make them in charge. My teams have to work for them, which makes them really unhappy. And not many of them like it. But I'm like, look, these guys went out there, raised money, kicked your ass in your category, and you want them to work for you? That makes no sense to me. You're going to work for them. Learn from them." "So our job is to enable these people. We look at them and say, whatever your business plan was when you were a small private company, find me a business plan that's twice as assertive and bold as the one you had then." "We've built a phenomenal system to take them to market. I have 3,000 people in the field... 3,000 people go out there and see 10,000 customers. So that's where the secret sauce kicks in." "We've bought 34 companies so far. I think our hit rate on things that have worked is over 70%."
3:01

"I don't think many tech companies execute M&A well." Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora breaks down his strategy for successful M&A: "Purchase price is an irrelevant artifact. If it's going to work, it's going to work phenomenally well, or you're going to screw it up. It's not what you paid, it's what you're able to do with it." "You could say that Instagram was expensive, or YouTube was expensive, or DoubleClick was expensive. They all worked perfectly. AOL Time Warner is a different story. So it boils down to how you execute past the price you pay for it." "In tech, when you buy a company, you buy a team, you buy an existing product, and you buy a roadmap for the future. The question is: can you deliver on that roadmap? Can you accelerate that roadmap? Does it work?" "We sign a term sheet, and we ask the founders to sit with our team and redesign the product roadmap so we like it and they like it. And if they don't agree with our expectations and we don't agree with theirs, we don't buy the company." "We make them in charge. My teams have to work for them, which makes them really unhappy. And not many of them like it. But I'm like, look, these guys went out there, raised money, kicked your ass in your category, and you want them to work for you? That makes no sense to me. You're going to work for them. Learn from them." "So our job is to enable these people. We look at them and say, whatever your business plan was when you were a small private company, find me a business plan that's twice as assertive and bold as the one you had then." "We've built a phenomenal system to take them to market. I have 3,000 people in the field... 3,000 people go out there and see 10,000 customers. So that's where the secret sauce kicks in." "We've bought 34 companies so far. I think our hit rate on things that have worked is over 70%."

TBPN

356,551 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

"I don't think many tech companies execute M&A well." Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora breaks down his strategy for successful M&A: "Purchase price is an irrelevant artifact. If it's going to work, it's going to work phenomenally well, or you're going to screw it up. It's not what you paid, it's what you're able to do with it." "You could say that Instagram was expensive, or YouTube was expensive, or DoubleClick was expensive. They all worked perfectly. AOL Time Warner is a different story. So it boils down to how you execute past the price you pay for it." "In tech, when you buy a company, you buy a team, you buy an existing product, and you buy a roadmap for the future. The question is: can you deliver on that roadmap? Can you accelerate that roadmap? Does it work?" "We sign a term sheet, and we ask the founders to sit with our team and redesign the product roadmap so we like it and they like it. And if they don't agree with our expectations and we don't agree with theirs, we don't buy the company." "We make them in charge. My teams have to work for them, which makes them really unhappy. And not many of them like it. But I'm like, look, these guys went out there, raised money, kicked your ass in your category, and you want them to work for you? That makes no sense to me. You're going to work for them. Learn from them." "So our job is to enable these people. We look at them and say, whatever your business plan was when you were a small private company, find me a business plan that's twice as assertive and bold as the one you had then." "We've built a phenomenal system to take them to market. I have 3,000 people in the field... 3,000 people go out there and see 10,000 customers. So that's where the secret sauce kicks in." "We've bought 34 companies so far. I think our hit rate on things that have worked is over 70%."
3:01

"I don't think many tech companies execute M&A well." Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora breaks down his strategy for successful M&A: "Purchase price is an irrelevant artifact. If it's going to work, it's going to work phenomenally well, or you're going to screw it up. It's not what you paid, it's what you're able to do with it." "You could say that Instagram was expensive, or YouTube was expensive, or DoubleClick was expensive. They all worked perfectly. AOL Time Warner is a different story. So it boils down to how you execute past the price you pay for it." "In tech, when you buy a company, you buy a team, you buy an existing product, and you buy a roadmap for the future. The question is: can you deliver on that roadmap? Can you accelerate that roadmap? Does it work?" "We sign a term sheet, and we ask the founders to sit with our team and redesign the product roadmap so we like it and they like it. And if they don't agree with our expectations and we don't agree with theirs, we don't buy the company." "We make them in charge. My teams have to work for them, which makes them really unhappy. And not many of them like it. But I'm like, look, these guys went out there, raised money, kicked your ass in your category, and you want them to work for you? That makes no sense to me. You're going to work for them. Learn from them." "So our job is to enable these people. We look at them and say, whatever your business plan was when you were a small private company, find me a business plan that's twice as assertive and bold as the one you had then." "We've built a phenomenal system to take them to market. I have 3,000 people in the field... 3,000 people go out there and see 10,000 customers. So that's where the secret sauce kicks in." "We've bought 34 companies so far. I think our hit rate on things that have worked is over 70%."

TBPN

39,506 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Zapier CEO Wade Foster says individuals have become more productive with AI tools, but that it's not clear if companies as a whole are also becoming more productive: "Across Zapier, 100% of our employees are using AI daily. People are individually more productive. But if you were to ask me, 'Is the company more productive, institutionally are we more productive?' It's a lot harder to say yes to that." "This feels like the next thing that everybody's working on: How do we actually accelerate the institution? This gets harder because you actually have to rethink how the company works." "To give you an example, we've gone from a world where code was expensive to now code is cheap. In the world where code was expensive, you had all these processes upfront to talk to customers, to align on roadmaps, to figure out what the right thing to build was, because if you chose the wrong thing, that was a really expensive mistake." "But when code is cheap, you can get rid of all that stuff. And that takes redesigning jobs or rethinking the human where the human actually exists in the first place."
1:54

Zapier CEO Wade Foster says individuals have become more productive with AI tools, but that it's not clear if companies as a whole are also becoming more productive: "Across Zapier, 100% of our employees are using AI daily. People are individually more productive. But if you were to ask me, 'Is the company more productive, institutionally are we more productive?' It's a lot harder to say yes to that." "This feels like the next thing that everybody's working on: How do we actually accelerate the institution? This gets harder because you actually have to rethink how the company works." "To give you an example, we've gone from a world where code was expensive to now code is cheap. In the world where code was expensive, you had all these processes upfront to talk to customers, to align on roadmaps, to figure out what the right thing to build was, because if you chose the wrong thing, that was a really expensive mistake." "But when code is cheap, you can get rid of all that stuff. And that takes redesigning jobs or rethinking the human where the human actually exists in the first place."

TBPN

15,382 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 KIM DOTCOM: “SIGNAL IS NOT SECURE — ALL THE TOOLS ARE BEING WATCHED” This is a disturbing warning from Kim Dotcom in his interview with Tucker Carlson. Carlson asks a simple question: are any of the communications apps millions of people rely upon — Signal, WhatsApp, iMessage — actually secure? Dotcom's answer is unequivocal: “No.” He goes much further, claiming that Signal is compromised by a US government “back door” and that people discussing genuinely sensitive information are wrong to believe their conversations cannot be accessed. Then comes perhaps the most chilling part of the exchange. Carlson asks whether someone attempting to organise resistance to tyranny could communicate securely. Dotcom replies: “You can't... because all the tools are being watched.” That is an extraordinary allegation. It needs evidence — particularly the specific claim of a government back door in Signal — but the wider question deserves serious scrutiny. How private are our supposedly private communications, and who ultimately has the ability to access them? Tucker Carlson Kim Dotcom
1:07

🚨 KIM DOTCOM: “SIGNAL IS NOT SECURE — ALL THE TOOLS ARE BEING WATCHED” This is a disturbing warning from Kim Dotcom in his interview with Tucker Carlson. Carlson asks a simple question: are any of the communications apps millions of people rely upon — Signal, WhatsApp, iMessage — actually secure? Dotcom's answer is unequivocal: “No.” He goes much further, claiming that Signal is compromised by a US government “back door” and that people discussing genuinely sensitive information are wrong to believe their conversations cannot be accessed. Then comes perhaps the most chilling part of the exchange. Carlson asks whether someone attempting to organise resistance to tyranny could communicate securely. Dotcom replies: “You can't... because all the tools are being watched.” That is an extraordinary allegation. It needs evidence — particularly the specific claim of a government back door in Signal — but the wider question deserves serious scrutiny. How private are our supposedly private communications, and who ultimately has the ability to access them? Tucker Carlson Kim Dotcom

Jim Ferguson

126,995 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Gusto cofounder Edward Kim says today is the most important day in Gusto's history since launch. They just shipped Gusto Cofounder, an AI agent that you talk to through texting and Slack that automates almost everything a small business does in its back office. He explains: "We start with all the problems that we're already helping our customers with — payroll, benefits, HR, scheduling — then we bring on a lot of the power of AI into it." "You tell us what your business processes are, starting with payroll, benefits, and all these things we're already doing for you. And Gusto Cofounder will basically run your business process for you." "You communicate with it through SMS and Slack. You don't really even interface with it through a website." "And we connect to all the systems that you're using outside of Gusto as well. Notion, QuickBooks, Google Workspace... Gusto Cofounder brings it all together into one place where it automates your business processes."
4:07

Gusto cofounder Edward Kim says today is the most important day in Gusto's history since launch. They just shipped Gusto Cofounder, an AI agent that you talk to through texting and Slack that automates almost everything a small business does in its back office. He explains: "We start with all the problems that we're already helping our customers with — payroll, benefits, HR, scheduling — then we bring on a lot of the power of AI into it." "You tell us what your business processes are, starting with payroll, benefits, and all these things we're already doing for you. And Gusto Cofounder will basically run your business process for you." "You communicate with it through SMS and Slack. You don't really even interface with it through a website." "And we connect to all the systems that you're using outside of Gusto as well. Notion, QuickBooks, Google Workspace... Gusto Cofounder brings it all together into one place where it automates your business processes."

TBPN

58,412 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I installed a new Visual Studio Code extension to help me write code. But this extension doesn't get in your way. It doesn't try to write code for you. It only gives you hints and recommendations about your code. I like that. Like a second pair of eyes, looking over my shoulder and telling me how I can do things better. The extension is Traycer. You can install it directly from inside Visual Studio Code. It's free forever for anyone working on open-source projects (and if you aren't, you can use it for free until the end of June.) I recorded a super-duper-quick video to show you how this extension works. I know code generation is a huge thing, but I really appreciate tools that help me do what I do better. Thanks to the Traycer team for helping me with the extension and collaborating with me on this post!
2:56

I installed a new Visual Studio Code extension to help me write code. But this extension doesn't get in your way. It doesn't try to write code for you. It only gives you hints and recommendations about your code. I like that. Like a second pair of eyes, looking over my shoulder and telling me how I can do things better. The extension is Traycer. You can install it directly from inside Visual Studio Code. It's free forever for anyone working on open-source projects (and if you aren't, you can use it for free until the end of June.) I recorded a super-duper-quick video to show you how this extension works. I know code generation is a huge thing, but I really appreciate tools that help me do what I do better. Thanks to the Traycer team for helping me with the extension and collaborating with me on this post!

Santiago

101,068 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 KIM DOTCOM: “EVERYTHING THAT FOLLOWED IS BECAUSE OF MY SUPPORT FOR THE TRUTH.” Kim Dotcom makes an explosive allegation in his interview with Tucker Carlson. He says that after WikiLeaks released the “Collateral Murder” video, he was so affected by what he saw that he donated substantial sums to WikiLeaks. Then, he says, everything changed. Dotcom claims the copyright case subsequently brought against him was retaliation for his financial support of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. Tucker immediately spots the wider question: If a website owner is criminally responsible for what users upload, why wouldn't the same principle apply to Facebook, Google and every other major platform? Dotcom's answer is chilling: “The big difference is they did not give money to WikiLeaks or Julian Assange.” If Dotcom is right about the motive, this wasn't simply a copyright battle. It was punishment for supporting WikiLeaks. Watch this exchange. Tucker Carlson Kim Dotcom
1:10

🚨 KIM DOTCOM: “EVERYTHING THAT FOLLOWED IS BECAUSE OF MY SUPPORT FOR THE TRUTH.” Kim Dotcom makes an explosive allegation in his interview with Tucker Carlson. He says that after WikiLeaks released the “Collateral Murder” video, he was so affected by what he saw that he donated substantial sums to WikiLeaks. Then, he says, everything changed. Dotcom claims the copyright case subsequently brought against him was retaliation for his financial support of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. Tucker immediately spots the wider question: If a website owner is criminally responsible for what users upload, why wouldn't the same principle apply to Facebook, Google and every other major platform? Dotcom's answer is chilling: “The big difference is they did not give money to WikiLeaks or Julian Assange.” If Dotcom is right about the motive, this wasn't simply a copyright battle. It was punishment for supporting WikiLeaks. Watch this exchange. Tucker Carlson Kim Dotcom

Jim Ferguson

19,021 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"The magic of tokens that's not really viable for stocks is that you could keep minting on the other side... totally decoupled from the fees coming in." Eddy Lazzarin ☀️ on the buy-and-burn vs. mint-and-spend, and the lever token networks have that equity doesn't: "The idea of the buy and burn is that you take revenue in one side, you charge whatever you can get away with in terms of your price. You take that revenue and use it to burn the token... reducing its supply, which helps it appreciate." "The mirror of the buy and burn is the mint and spend. And this is where you are minting tokens out of nowhere to pay for whatever you need for growth or for network activities." "You can keep pulling in fees and test your ability to charge in the market while completely separately scaling your spending in order to facilitate the most growth." "In stocks, you can't pay an onboarding bonus to Uber drivers or whatever with your stock... To pay for growth, a conventional company has to do it in a very indirect way. They have to sell the equity to an investor in a private round to get cash to spend on growth. But this allows you to circumvent that completely."
1:43

"The magic of tokens that's not really viable for stocks is that you could keep minting on the other side... totally decoupled from the fees coming in." Eddy Lazzarin ☀️ on the buy-and-burn vs. mint-and-spend, and the lever token networks have that equity doesn't: "The idea of the buy and burn is that you take revenue in one side, you charge whatever you can get away with in terms of your price. You take that revenue and use it to burn the token... reducing its supply, which helps it appreciate." "The mirror of the buy and burn is the mint and spend. And this is where you are minting tokens out of nowhere to pay for whatever you need for growth or for network activities." "You can keep pulling in fees and test your ability to charge in the market while completely separately scaling your spending in order to facilitate the most growth." "In stocks, you can't pay an onboarding bonus to Uber drivers or whatever with your stock... To pay for growth, a conventional company has to do it in a very indirect way. They have to sell the equity to an investor in a private round to get cash to spend on growth. But this allows you to circumvent that completely."

a16z crypto

25,761 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Andy Dunn (Andy Dunn) says he wants his company Pie to "be the operating system by which you get off your phone and back into real life." "It's an app and an AI agent to build infrastructure for your whole social life." "The primary product is an app that has events that we think you might want to go to, communities that you might want to belong to, and people we think you'd want to meet. And that's how it gets going." "Sometimes, [even] if you have a lot of friends, and you have a good social life, what sucks is it's hard to find time to see them. It's hard to get out of this rat race to actually prioritize seeing the people you care about." "So that's why we just launched an AI agent called Pienelope. Her job is in iMessage as well as — soon, in the app — to help be a 'social life instigator' and 'chaos coordinator' to get you together with the people that you should be spending more time with."
0:58

Andy Dunn (Andy Dunn) says he wants his company Pie to "be the operating system by which you get off your phone and back into real life." "It's an app and an AI agent to build infrastructure for your whole social life." "The primary product is an app that has events that we think you might want to go to, communities that you might want to belong to, and people we think you'd want to meet. And that's how it gets going." "Sometimes, [even] if you have a lot of friends, and you have a good social life, what sucks is it's hard to find time to see them. It's hard to get out of this rat race to actually prioritize seeing the people you care about." "So that's why we just launched an AI agent called Pienelope. Her job is in iMessage as well as — soon, in the app — to help be a 'social life instigator' and 'chaos coordinator' to get you together with the people that you should be spending more time with."

TBPN

43,045 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Sequoia partner Sonya Huang 🐥 says we're going from the age of product-led growth to the age of agent-led growth. "You see this most clearly if you're using Claude Code actively. It says, 'Hey, for a database, you should use Supabase. For hosting, use Vercel.' It's choosing for you, the stuff you should be using." "Product-led growth brought us closer to the vision of 'best product wins,' but ultimately people are still lazy. They can't read all the reviews, and they kind of default to what looks cool on the website." "Whereas your agent has infinite time to go and make these choices for you. It can go and read all the documentation, read all the user comments, and figure out [what you need] for your use case."
2:58

Sequoia partner Sonya Huang 🐥 says we're going from the age of product-led growth to the age of agent-led growth. "You see this most clearly if you're using Claude Code actively. It says, 'Hey, for a database, you should use Supabase. For hosting, use Vercel.' It's choosing for you, the stuff you should be using." "Product-led growth brought us closer to the vision of 'best product wins,' but ultimately people are still lazy. They can't read all the reviews, and they kind of default to what looks cool on the website." "Whereas your agent has infinite time to go and make these choices for you. It can go and read all the documentation, read all the user comments, and figure out [what you need] for your use case."

TBPN

1,196,173 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

WATCH: The US State Department has recognised mass migration as an existential threat to Western Civilisation and has ordered its NZ embassy to collect data on crimes and human rights problems caused by our migration policies. For anyone still unclear on why mass migration is an existential threat, you have your terror attacks, rape gangs, rising ethnic tensions and so on, but at root the problem is this: a nation is not its geography or its institutions, it is its people…and if you replace the people, you have destroyed that nation.
2:56

WATCH: The US State Department has recognised mass migration as an existential threat to Western Civilisation and has ordered its NZ embassy to collect data on crimes and human rights problems caused by our migration policies. For anyone still unclear on why mass migration is an existential threat, you have your terror attacks, rape gangs, rising ethnic tensions and so on, but at root the problem is this: a nation is not its geography or its institutions, it is its people…and if you replace the people, you have destroyed that nation.

William McGimpsey🇳🇿

41,888 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Codex doesn't lock you into OpenAI models. Tibo Tibo on why: "If you are part of this community and building an excellent coding harness, why would you couple it to your model? That felt quite disappointing, to make that decision. It didn't feel right. And it's open source in the first place. It would have been trivial for anyone to fork it. But then you're encouraging people to go and use that fork, and now suddenly you have overhead and the only reason you have a fork is because you wanted to change 10 lines of code to add support for another model provider. That feels very silly. So why not just support it in the first place? The other thing is we benefit a lot from being able to give optionality. Maybe today you love using OpenAI models and you're super productive with them, but tomorrow there's a new model that comes out and you want to try that. Why force you to completely change your setup just to try a new model? Optionality is very important to companies that we work with. And this is something that we absolutely lean into."
1:50

Codex doesn't lock you into OpenAI models. Tibo Tibo on why: "If you are part of this community and building an excellent coding harness, why would you couple it to your model? That felt quite disappointing, to make that decision. It didn't feel right. And it's open source in the first place. It would have been trivial for anyone to fork it. But then you're encouraging people to go and use that fork, and now suddenly you have overhead and the only reason you have a fork is because you wanted to change 10 lines of code to add support for another model provider. That feels very silly. So why not just support it in the first place? The other thing is we benefit a lot from being able to give optionality. Maybe today you love using OpenAI models and you're super productive with them, but tomorrow there's a new model that comes out and you want to try that. Why force you to completely change your setup just to try a new model? Optionality is very important to companies that we work with. And this is something that we absolutely lean into."

The Pragmatic Engineer

198,981 просмотров • 16 дней назад

REPORTER: You suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a Tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school… Why are you the only person saying this? TRUMP: Other nations have Tomahawks. They buy them from us. But whatever the report shows, I’m WILLING TO LIVE WITH THAT REPORT
0:37

REPORTER: You suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a Tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school… Why are you the only person saying this? TRUMP: Other nations have Tomahawks. They buy them from us. But whatever the report shows, I’m WILLING TO LIVE WITH THAT REPORT

RT

186,473 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."
4:16

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Ibbitson: "In some ways, the most distressing thing about this administration is that it lies over and over and over again through its teeth. Other governments don't lie. If you have an agreement with the UK or with France or with Australia, you have an agreement. But if you have an agreement with the US now, you just have a piece of paper. And is it worth anything more than the paper that it was written on? We don't know, because Donald Trump."
0:39

Ibbitson: "In some ways, the most distressing thing about this administration is that it lies over and over and over again through its teeth. Other governments don't lie. If you have an agreement with the UK or with France or with Australia, you have an agreement. But if you have an agreement with the US now, you just have a piece of paper. And is it worth anything more than the paper that it was written on? We don't know, because Donald Trump."

Scott Robertson

27,774 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад