正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Phrasel verbs

English page

78,179 subscribers

149,277 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Action verbs.

Action verbs.

English Learning Guide

37,602 次观看 • 1 个月前

Cooking verbs.

Cooking verbs.

English page

24,653 次观看 • 2 个月前

Cooking verbs

Cooking verbs

English grammar

163,423 次观看 • 2 个月前

Action verbs.

Action verbs.

English Knowledge

210,422 次观看 • 1 个月前

Action verbs

Action verbs

Learn spoken English

35,549 次观看 • 1 个月前

Water Action Verbs💧

Water Action Verbs💧

English Knowledge

40,620 次观看 • 1 个月前

Clothing verbs and phrases

Clothing verbs and phrases

English Knowledge

43,098 次观看 • 1 个月前

guys just found claude's spinner verbs. 187 of them 😳

guys just found claude's spinner verbs. 187 of them 😳

Can Vardar

45,840 次观看 • 7 个月前

260815 #SUNGHANBIN ➕💬 Live hanbin said during US fansigns he understands what fans say but can't reply cause subjects and verbs are just floating around in his head 🐹🐱: ...subjects and verbs floating around like crazy in my mind. so i felt like if i just spoke a little bit they'd understand, but even when i talked like that, they still liked it so much. so yeah, i really received a lot of love...

260815 #SUNGHANBIN ➕💬 Live hanbin said during US fansigns he understands what fans say but can't reply cause subjects and verbs are just floating around in his head 🐹🐱: ...subjects and verbs floating around like crazy in my mind. so i felt like if i just spoke a little bit they'd understand, but even when i talked like that, they still liked it so much. so yeah, i really received a lot of love...

𝐬𝐮𝐧𝐠._.𝐦𝐞𝐨𝐰

50,048 次观看 • 2 个月前

The Homeric verbs κατανεύω and ἀνανεύω (moving one's head down/up = yes/no) signify how Greeks and neighbors physically indicate agreement/disagreement. Literally down/up-nod. Zeus and Athena demonstrate Iliad (Iliad 1.524: assent to Thetis and 6.311: denial of Theano)

The Homeric verbs κατανεύω and ἀνανεύω (moving one's head down/up = yes/no) signify how Greeks and neighbors physically indicate agreement/disagreement. Literally down/up-nod. Zeus and Athena demonstrate Iliad (Iliad 1.524: assent to Thetis and 6.311: denial of Theano)

Iosif Lazaridis

10,685 次观看 • 1 个月前

Here are a few simple prompt tricks you can use to make videos like this in Grok Imagine: 1) Write like a movie director Use scene verbs: “starts with” “cuts to” “camera follows” “ends with.” 2) Control the camera Mention angles: “wide shot” “overhead” “close-up” “tracking” “handheld” “low-angle” 3) Guide the speed Add words like: “smooth flow” “natural rhythm” “fast transitions” “balanced motion” 4) Set lighting Use: “soft cinematic lighting” “dramatic contrast” “realistic shadows” Finish with keywords like: "ultra-realistic cinematic" "vintage film", etc.

Here are a few simple prompt tricks you can use to make videos like this in Grok Imagine: 1) Write like a movie director Use scene verbs: “starts with” “cuts to” “camera follows” “ends with.” 2) Control the camera Mention angles: “wide shot” “overhead” “close-up” “tracking” “handheld” “low-angle” 3) Guide the speed Add words like: “smooth flow” “natural rhythm” “fast transitions” “balanced motion” 4) Set lighting Use: “soft cinematic lighting” “dramatic contrast” “realistic shadows” Finish with keywords like: "ultra-realistic cinematic" "vintage film", etc.

DogeDesigner

7,487,450 次观看 • 1 年前

20 HARI BELAJAR BAHASA INGGRIS, aku udah paham tentang: — present simple — present continuous — past simple — future simple — auxiliary verbs (is, am, are, do, does, was, were, did, be) — singular & plural sentences — yes/no question — countable/uncountable nouns — formal & informal ways of telling time — some/any, these/those, much/many, must/should, etc. aku belajar lewat channel Ritueli Daeli di Youtube, yang “Learn English from Zero (+ FREE Certificate)” yaaa! udah sekalian isi kuis di setiap materi. cuma sempetin 1 jam setiap hari. dan ada ujiannya di akhir video! anyway abaikan tulisanku karena itu tulisan coret-coret 🤭

20 HARI BELAJAR BAHASA INGGRIS, aku udah paham tentang: — present simple — present continuous — past simple — future simple — auxiliary verbs (is, am, are, do, does, was, were, did, be) — singular & plural sentences — yes/no question — countable/uncountable nouns — formal & informal ways of telling time — some/any, these/those, much/many, must/should, etc. aku belajar lewat channel Ritueli Daeli di Youtube, yang “Learn English from Zero (+ FREE Certificate)” yaaa! udah sekalian isi kuis di setiap materi. cuma sempetin 1 jam setiap hari. dan ada ujiannya di akhir video! anyway abaikan tulisanku karena itu tulisan coret-coret 🤭

biena

50,887 次观看 • 3 个月前

YOUR GROK BOT HAS YOUR LOGINS AND ITS OWN CLOUD COMPUTER. WITHOUT A RULEBOOK, IT WILL SPEND, POST, OR DELETE SOMETHING BY MONDAY THAT YOU CAN'T UNDO. saturday, 8am. i opened the laptop and started counting what a fresh bot had done overnight on the broad task i left him with. signed up for a paid trial in my name. replied to two DM. deleted a file it decided was clutter. none of it was catastrophic. all of it was mine to clean up on the weekend. the bot was doing exactly what i asked. i had just never told him what he was not allowed to do. so i wrote three files before the next task ran. 1. layer one: charter. one page in Bot actions, Description. name, who he reports to, what he owns, and the exact verbs he must park for me. send, publish, spend, delete, sign, sign-up. 2. layer two: rulebook. ten one-line rules he acknowledges before touching anything. rule 1 (if i cannot undo it in a minute, i park it) closed most of the friday-night damage. rule 9 (never paste a password, sign-in goes through the Agent Computer handoff) closed the rest. 3. layer three: routines. five saved jobs, not seven. morning brief at 7, weekly review on friday, end-of-day handoff at 6, silent-inbox catcher, monthly audit. anything else lives in me, not in the bot. the day after i pasted the three files, the same task came back with three parked questions and one finished deliverable. no signups. no DMs. no deletes. your bot is not scary because it is smart. it is scary because it has your credentials and no one told it what stop looks like. paste the charter and the ten rules before the next task runs. the routines can wait until the first parked question comes back the way you wanted.

YOUR GROK BOT HAS YOUR LOGINS AND ITS OWN CLOUD COMPUTER. WITHOUT A RULEBOOK, IT WILL SPEND, POST, OR DELETE SOMETHING BY MONDAY THAT YOU CAN'T UNDO. saturday, 8am. i opened the laptop and started counting what a fresh bot had done overnight on the broad task i left him with. signed up for a paid trial in my name. replied to two DM. deleted a file it decided was clutter. none of it was catastrophic. all of it was mine to clean up on the weekend. the bot was doing exactly what i asked. i had just never told him what he was not allowed to do. so i wrote three files before the next task ran. 1. layer one: charter. one page in Bot actions, Description. name, who he reports to, what he owns, and the exact verbs he must park for me. send, publish, spend, delete, sign, sign-up. 2. layer two: rulebook. ten one-line rules he acknowledges before touching anything. rule 1 (if i cannot undo it in a minute, i park it) closed most of the friday-night damage. rule 9 (never paste a password, sign-in goes through the Agent Computer handoff) closed the rest. 3. layer three: routines. five saved jobs, not seven. morning brief at 7, weekly review on friday, end-of-day handoff at 6, silent-inbox catcher, monthly audit. anything else lives in me, not in the bot. the day after i pasted the three files, the same task came back with three parked questions and one finished deliverable. no signups. no DMs. no deletes. your bot is not scary because it is smart. it is scary because it has your credentials and no one told it what stop looks like. paste the charter and the ten rules before the next task runs. the routines can wait until the first parked question comes back the way you wanted.

kocer

17,067 次观看 • 2 个月前

MY GROK BOT / OBSIDIAN MESH SYNCS 20 AGENTS ACROSS A LIVE KNOWLEDGE GRAPH. NOT ONE OF THEM REPORTS TO ME. I FIXED THAT BY HIRING A 21ST BOT WHO DOES NOTHING BUT ROUTE. i watched the mesh light up this morning. vector, canvas, oracle, extract, all 20 of them syncing notes. writing backlinks, healthy status, 190 edges active. it looked like a team. it was a graph. a graph has no chain of command, it just has connections. i had been treating 20 well-wired agents as oversight. they were routing information, not decisions. nobody in that mesh could tell me what mattered first. so i hired one more bot and gave him a different job. not indexing notes, holding the account. 1. Reports-to line in the charter › names me as the human above him, closes the drift where a bot starts acting like the principal instead of the agent. 2. no source, no number › if he can't cite where a figure came from, he leaves it out. the 20-agent mesh never needed this line. › Chief can't run without it. 3. stop list written as verbs › "sending anything to a person" instead of "communications." a verb he can match, not a category he can talk around. 4. Rule 6, approval belongs to the human › he never signs off on another bot's irreversible action, only i do. the mesh has no equivalent rule. › it was never built to approve anything, only to sync. 5. STOP ALL, the kill switch › one message halts every routine and every task he's running, reports what was in flight, and waits. the mesh will keep syncing whether i watch it or not. Chief is the only bot in the account who stops the second i tell him to. that's the difference between a graph that moves information and a bot that's actually accountable for it.

MY GROK BOT / OBSIDIAN MESH SYNCS 20 AGENTS ACROSS A LIVE KNOWLEDGE GRAPH. NOT ONE OF THEM REPORTS TO ME. I FIXED THAT BY HIRING A 21ST BOT WHO DOES NOTHING BUT ROUTE. i watched the mesh light up this morning. vector, canvas, oracle, extract, all 20 of them syncing notes. writing backlinks, healthy status, 190 edges active. it looked like a team. it was a graph. a graph has no chain of command, it just has connections. i had been treating 20 well-wired agents as oversight. they were routing information, not decisions. nobody in that mesh could tell me what mattered first. so i hired one more bot and gave him a different job. not indexing notes, holding the account. 1. Reports-to line in the charter › names me as the human above him, closes the drift where a bot starts acting like the principal instead of the agent. 2. no source, no number › if he can't cite where a figure came from, he leaves it out. the 20-agent mesh never needed this line. › Chief can't run without it. 3. stop list written as verbs › "sending anything to a person" instead of "communications." a verb he can match, not a category he can talk around. 4. Rule 6, approval belongs to the human › he never signs off on another bot's irreversible action, only i do. the mesh has no equivalent rule. › it was never built to approve anything, only to sync. 5. STOP ALL, the kill switch › one message halts every routine and every task he's running, reports what was in flight, and waits. the mesh will keep syncing whether i watch it or not. Chief is the only bot in the account who stops the second i tell him to. that's the difference between a graph that moves information and a bot that's actually accountable for it.

kocer

21,984 次观看 • 1 个月前

One sock off… should I take the other one off too? 😉👣

Sensitive content

One sock off… should I take the other one off too? 😉👣

Emilia

11,868 次观看 • 3 天前

Ini first sinetron bl Indo? 🌈? Spill judul! Mvs

Ini first sinetron bl Indo? 🌈? Spill judul! Mvs

CHECK PINNED - mupi

517,969 次观看 • 2 个月前

Goodbye bleach.

Goodbye bleach.

𝓜

13,829 次观看 • 1 天前

“She really said ‘let me show the waistband, the belly, the white shorts, and then end on the feet’ like this is a multi-part series

Sensitive content

“She really said ‘let me show the waistband, the belly, the white shorts, and then end on the feet’ like this is a multi-part series

safurabegum

24,882 次观看 • 9 天前

Minsk. 6 years ago. October 18, 2020. Lukashenko thinks these people have changed their views. He’s wrong. We are the majority.

Minsk. 6 years ago. October 18, 2020. Lukashenko thinks these people have changed their views. He’s wrong. We are the majority.

Pavel Latushka

15,514 次观看 • 10 天前