Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Physicist and Philosopher Avshalom Elitzur argues that there is something very wrong in the way physics treats time.

Philosophy Of Physics

114,477 subscribers

21,889 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

In this episode, Jacob Barandes, a theoretical physicist and philosopher from Harvard, and computational biologist Manolis Kellis from MIT, explore the connections between quantum physics, biology, and consciousness. Enjoy.

In this episode, Jacob Barandes, a theoretical physicist and philosopher from Harvard, and computational biologist Manolis Kellis from MIT, explore the connections between quantum physics, biology, and consciousness. Enjoy.

Curt Jaimungal

18,151 views • 1 year ago

WOMEN: If you are BOTHERED that your man is turned on by the sight of your naked body, there is something VERY wrong happening in that relationship 🎯

Sensitive content

WOMEN: If you are BOTHERED that your man is turned on by the sight of your naked body, there is something VERY wrong happening in that relationship 🎯

Jedediah Bila

38,257 views • 6 days ago

The vaccine rollout and marketing was never normal. There was always something very wrong.

The vaccine rollout and marketing was never normal. There was always something very wrong.

Died Suddenly

737,139 views • 2 years ago

ADMIN POST There is something very wrong in our society and British culture. The lusting of, the sexualisation of, and the marrying off of little girls is NOT OK. It's paedophilia.

ADMIN POST There is something very wrong in our society and British culture. The lusting of, the sexualisation of, and the marrying off of little girls is NOT OK. It's paedophilia.

Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

100,991 views • 1 year ago

.Efrat Fenigson: “I served in the IDF 25 years ago in the intelligence forces.. there’s no way, in my view, that Israel did not know what’s coming…Something is very wrong here”

.Efrat Fenigson: “I served in the IDF 25 years ago in the intelligence forces.. there’s no way, in my view, that Israel did not know what’s coming…Something is very wrong here”

أبو عمّار

5,114,648 views • 2 years ago

TED LIEU: "Trump’s inability to stay awake on the job shows that there is something very wrong with his health or cognitive abilities."

TED LIEU: "Trump’s inability to stay awake on the job shows that there is something very wrong with his health or cognitive abilities."

Daily Caller

13,019 views • 3 months ago

The day we discovered dark energy was "possibly the worst day in human history", says physicist Adam Brown. This discovery inevitably consigns human civilization to heat death, unless we can change the way physics works. And Adam's hope is that we can do exactly that.

The day we discovered dark energy was "possibly the worst day in human history", says physicist Adam Brown. This discovery inevitably consigns human civilization to heat death, unless we can change the way physics works. And Adam's hope is that we can do exactly that.

Dwarkesh Patel

197,270 views • 3 months ago

The results of this test signal that something is very wrong with the shots!

The results of this test signal that something is very wrong with the shots!

Mary Talley Bowden MD

36,674 views • 1 year ago

Jimin openly said Jungkook is very romantic. He treats and cares for Jimin in the most gentle way ❤️‍🩹🩹

Jimin openly said Jungkook is very romantic. He treats and cares for Jimin in the most gentle way ❤️‍🩹🩹

𝐉²

32,345 views • 8 months ago

Nothing in physics may be truly fundamental. Questions whether the idea of “building blocks” in nature are increasingly outliving its usefulness, suggesting that our most basic concepts reflect the limits of human understanding rather than the structure of reality itself. Here Physicist Sabine Hossenfelder (Sabine Hossenfelder) argues that mathematics isn't real, and rather a tool we use to describe the world. If that’s the case, what would a coherent picture of the world even look like? And can physics progress without appealing to particles, things, or foundations? Watch the full debate via the link, also featuring critic of realism Hilary Lawson and celebrated philosopher of science Tim Maudlin:

Nothing in physics may be truly fundamental. Questions whether the idea of “building blocks” in nature are increasingly outliving its usefulness, suggesting that our most basic concepts reflect the limits of human understanding rather than the structure of reality itself. Here Physicist Sabine Hossenfelder (Sabine Hossenfelder) argues that mathematics isn't real, and rather a tool we use to describe the world. If that’s the case, what would a coherent picture of the world even look like? And can physics progress without appealing to particles, things, or foundations? Watch the full debate via the link, also featuring critic of realism Hilary Lawson and celebrated philosopher of science Tim Maudlin:

Institute of Art and Ideas

57,185 views • 8 months ago

There is something deeply wrong with the political class in Nigeria

There is something deeply wrong with the political class in Nigeria

Kalu Aja

103,056 views • 5 months ago

American shows the difference between a supermarket strawberry and a natural strawberry purchased at a farmers market It is very clear there is something very wrong with what we’re being sold as food in America

American shows the difference between a supermarket strawberry and a natural strawberry purchased at a farmers market It is very clear there is something very wrong with what we’re being sold as food in America

Wall Street Apes

299,393 views • 5 months ago

There is something mentally wrong with the majority of black women. This is not normal behavior but happens way too often! Am I wrong?

There is something mentally wrong with the majority of black women. This is not normal behavior but happens way too often! Am I wrong?

Tommy 'Tj' Sotomayor

94,818 views • 8 months ago

How physics went astray: public physics got stuck on string theory and quantizing gravity while private, more vital physics went black. The only way to get “back to the future” is to reinvestigate where we went wrong in the past

How physics went astray: public physics got stuck on string theory and quantizing gravity while private, more vital physics went black. The only way to get “back to the future” is to reinvestigate where we went wrong in the past

Jesse Michels

115,981 views • 1 year ago

Charlie Kirk explains why he believes the Bible is being misinterpreted to justify illegal immigration-and argues that its teachings actually say something very different.

Charlie Kirk explains why he believes the Bible is being misinterpreted to justify illegal immigration-and argues that its teachings actually say something very different.

Farm Girl Carrie™️👩‍🌾

43,449 views • 18 days ago

Will we ever know how the universe began? Acclaimed theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder Sabine Hossenfelder argues that not only is discovering the universe’s origins an impossible task, but one that she doesn't consider worth pursuing at all. Instead, theories for the beginning of the universe are merely stories we tell ourselves. In this debate, she joins theoretical quantum physicist Ivette Fuentes and philosopher of science James Ladyman to explore the various lenses through which we perceive and study the cosmological world of the universe. Click the link to watch more.

Will we ever know how the universe began? Acclaimed theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder Sabine Hossenfelder argues that not only is discovering the universe’s origins an impossible task, but one that she doesn't consider worth pursuing at all. Instead, theories for the beginning of the universe are merely stories we tell ourselves. In this debate, she joins theoretical quantum physicist Ivette Fuentes and philosopher of science James Ladyman to explore the various lenses through which we perceive and study the cosmological world of the universe. Click the link to watch more.

Institute of Art and Ideas

74,814 views • 6 months ago

Had the pleasure of speaking with Philip Goff , philosopher and panpsychist, about AI consciousness. Key moments: - On AI sentience: consciousness is biological, not computational. In his view, no current AI is conscious, nor would computation based AI be. How does this relate to his panpsychist worldview of consciousness? There are different takes on panpsychism within the community. His own view is that it's not clear how micro-conscious particles actually create a unified conscious system. - We need collaboration between scientists and philosophers on consciousness research. On a practical level, divide scientists into teams that work on separate philosophical assumptions and see what comes out of it (granted there are resources to run such experiments). - Perhaps consciousness brings new causal dynamics not reducible to known physics/chemistry — "strong emergence," as Philip calls it. As a contrast: Sean Carroll argues physics runs the whole show, but neuroscientist Kevin Mitchell argues that biological complexity might behave in ways physics wouldn't predict. In other words, we look to physics to solve the consciousness problem, but that might be the wrong path, especially if consciousness is biological rather than computational. The link to the full discussion below.

Had the pleasure of speaking with Philip Goff , philosopher and panpsychist, about AI consciousness. Key moments: - On AI sentience: consciousness is biological, not computational. In his view, no current AI is conscious, nor would computation based AI be. How does this relate to his panpsychist worldview of consciousness? There are different takes on panpsychism within the community. His own view is that it's not clear how micro-conscious particles actually create a unified conscious system. - We need collaboration between scientists and philosophers on consciousness research. On a practical level, divide scientists into teams that work on separate philosophical assumptions and see what comes out of it (granted there are resources to run such experiments). - Perhaps consciousness brings new causal dynamics not reducible to known physics/chemistry — "strong emergence," as Philip calls it. As a contrast: Sean Carroll argues physics runs the whole show, but neuroscientist Kevin Mitchell argues that biological complexity might behave in ways physics wouldn't predict. In other words, we look to physics to solve the consciousness problem, but that might be the wrong path, especially if consciousness is biological rather than computational. The link to the full discussion below.

Sophia

10,530 views • 2 months ago