Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Pierre refusing to answer the question about needing the Bloc AND the NDP to vote with his party to defeat the Liberals is hilarious and should tell you this is all a big stupid show Votes needed for non-confidence motion to pass: 170 CPC: 119 BQ: 33 NDP: 25... show more
464,171 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
10 Comments

Take a shot every time Pierre says carbon tax or “Verb the Noun”. Fastest route to the ER in politics 😂

You gotta admit though all those 3 word slogans are pretty inspiring Really makes ya wanna cut down a tax tree and build a home out of it

Slogans, slogans & more slogans. Can anyone imagine him in a debate with PMJT, as a PM or on the world stage? Yet Carleton voted this simpleton in 7x while doing nothing here for 20 yrs. A Russian & India puppet doing Harper’s bidding. #PierrePoilievreIsLyingToYou

How many times can he 'verb a noun'? Seriously, all he does is repeat his little slogans over and over... He doesn't answer a single question, he just keeps saying his 'verb a noun' slogans!

What’s wrong with his speech? He’s stuttering and talking awfully slow. It’s like he can’t think straight and struggling to get the words out. Is he on heavy duty meds or did he have a couple of glasses of spiked kool-aid?

This latest deep low voice, slow pace delivery he's taken on (to sound more statesman I guess?) makes him look and sound dopey. How is it also not disqualifying that he refuses to take on a security clearance process? This is seriously alarming, red flags all over.

He is just showing Canadians how the NDP and Bloc only care about themselves and not most of Canada. It will only be better for him showing them for what they really are.

He just repeats the same old tropes over and over and over and over again. Why do these journalists not ask him to stop doing that? Come up with something original and offer some plans to Canadians. @PierrePoilievre This coward gets away with this because of poor journalism.

@PierrePoilievre I actually thought the reporter in this video did an excellent job pushing back, made her question heard even though he refused to receive it Then his lack of answer made the question function as a rhetorical one which was effective imo

@PierrePoilievre is such a coward. he runs away from the reporters. i guess he has no 3 word slogans that he can use for an answer to their questions. so limiting, isn't it Pierre-i-don't-care?

