Piers Morgan thinks that “i dont get it” is an argument against modern physics.🤭

@kaizen000000000 “Supernatural sky daddy” 😂 he made me laugh so hard when he said that lol

😅👌🏻💯

“..Belief systems” 🤦🏼‍♂️😅

Not believing your claim without evidence is not a belief system🤭🤦🏼‍♂️ it’s skepticism.✅ If I don’t believe in ghosts, that doesn’t mean I have “faith in no ghosts.”😅😅 It means I’m unconvinced by the claim

@KameronLoe

@mupsula You’re the only one making such claims You’re mocking a strawman you invented because it’s easier for your brain to process Dimwit

@kaizen000000000 Piers is such at a lower intellectual level, it's hard to watch.

@kaizen000000000 Atheists use "I don't get it" as their main argument against God's existence..

Yes idiotic you’re 👌🏻 Correct✅

Keep showcasing your idiocy openly Dimwit

@kaizen000000000 You have to admire Piers for debating with so many lifetime academics and thinking he has a gotcha moment with each and every one of them simply because he doesn’t have a scientific solution for everything.

@kaizen000000000 Morgan destroyed dawkings

So you wished

@kaizen000000000 Time didn't exist before the big bang? With no proof? Apart from physics is deep and mysterious. Sounds like "trust me bro" science to me.

@kaizen000000000 He arrogance and disrespect to God calling him “sky daddy” is very telling! They do no want God to be real because it makes them look like idiots. They can’t explain so they don’t think anyone else should even try 😂😂

To believe this “scientific” approach one has to really really wanna believe it. This is why I say that atheism is actually a faith based effort. They claim to know what they can’t know because they haven’t been everywhere and throughout time. The agnostic who shrugs his shoulders is a far more reasonable though can just as likely be wrong.

@kaizen000000000 And Dawkins thinks "because physicists will tell you" is an argument.

No, Dawkins did not “destroy” Morgan. In fact, he defeated his own argument when he said that our minds are incapable of understanding due to millions of years of evolution on the African plains. In fact, if that is true, we have no reason to trust our minds whatsoever including as it pertains to evolution, biology etc.

Oh come on, of course there is a before. Take the Higgs Boson as and example, it always existed ‘before’ it was discovered, able to be materialised by the LHC. More importantly part of the problem with physics is physicists! They are too bogged down with the known knowns! So humans have only become intelligent in the last 200 years ? Of course not, our intelligence has been suppressed by this narrow school of thought and teaching of the apparent known knowns. Thank goodness for AI, WE, might finally throw off the shackles of so called intelligent people and let free thought breakdown the elitist barriers.

@kaizen000000000 there was something before the big bang. Maybe not what we can think of, but there was something. Logically, “nothing” will remain “nothing”. The “thing” we experience now came from “something” that was already here

@kaizen000000000 We are not meant to understand anything outside of time. We are inside time & will never understand the outside of time… that’s like trying to understand being dead we haven’t experienced it YET.

Only he doesn't, does he? He just does what scientists do: concede that they don't understand and don't have the answers. “God has placed eternity in the heart of man.” That is why, as the Prof admits, there is the transcendent. Then we get to the foolish bit. “The fool has said in his heart, there is no God.” It seems, sir, that you are being foolish!

@kaizen000000000 Only a baby brain, that refuses to grow up, such as Morgan's brain, needs to turn to a daddy in the sky for comfort.

@kaizen000000000 Hey @PiersUncensored ... What were your thoughts about the Big Bang before you were born? See how that works? You didn't have any thoughts or opinions about the Big Bang before you were born, because you didn't exist yet... Now apply that concept to time...

@kaizen000000000 We are a bubble of a universe, separate from but also born from a multiverse or black hole. Gods may have been created for psychological comfort, but the collective energy manifested is powerful, so it's real. Maybe just not how we understand It.

@kaizen000000000 Where does a circle start and end? That is like asking “what was before the Big Bang?” People struggle to wrap their head around the concept of time as being non-linear and cyclic but that is how it is.

@kaizen000000000 If you accept the premise of a “god” before the Big Bang, who created everything. It then begs the question- who created that “god”. Because according to you there had to be a “before”. It would then take a more intelligent being to create that “god”. And, so forth, infinitely…

@kaizen000000000 If you asked Piers what came before God and the world’s creation in Genesis, he would say “nothing” or “i don’t know” without any confusion about it. But the same answer applied to the big bang twists him in knots for some reason.

@kaizen000000000 'We can't explain it, it's a mystery, beyond our brains... but we know for sure it's not God'

@kaizen000000000 “Oxford Professor Destroys Piers Morgan” seems opposite of the video’s content. Was that the sender’s belief, which makes him, forgive me, an idiot, or an attempt at “click bait”?

@kaizen000000000 It’s not hard to destroy Piers Morgan. This guy definitely did just that. I love that he put it down in a way a baby could understand it. Piers is still trying to understand it though.

@kaizen000000000 Actually, although I frequently disagree with Piers Morgan and believe he churns antisemitism for ratings, I think he acquitted himself quite well here. His guest was reduced to arguing that we must accept physicists’ words because they get physics, & we can’t bc it’s mysterious

No different to say “I can not comprehend God. Because you are not a Christian.” Both these arguments are based on faith: physicists have faith in their argument as do Christians to theirs . But here is a nugget : God has given us faith; to all, also a physician to believe in something that does not make any sense

@kaizen000000000 Both are retards. This is what happens when two people talk about topics either of them understand.

You’re clearly lacking the brain power to understand what’s being said You’re the stupid one

Piers thinks that if he doesn’t understand something it means it’s impossible for it to exist. The other dude thinks God is “just a “sky-daddy”, completely ignorant, not having a slightest idea about its actual meaning in the Abrahamic religions. Piers is unable to argue even that. Correct me if I’m wrong

Watch the video again Dawkins refused to acknowledge a claim from a field he lacks knowledge about and that’s understandable and honest

I’m fine with what he say about the “science” part, but he is completely ignorant about how God is described in religious texts such as Holy Quran or Holy Bible. Piers can’t clarify? Why? Piers thinks that if he doesn’t understand something it’s impossible for it to exist. That’s ridiculous too. And the Dawkins guy can’t argue that either? It’s so simple… Like a blind person who’s never seen the color red for example, he doesn’t understand it either, cannot imagine it. With Piers logic red wouldn’t exist. The concept of reality as we know itself is not always applicable. Time included. God, Universe, Creator, doesn’t matter how you call Him. He exists beyond that concept of reality. “Allah (God) is described as Al-Awwal (The First) and Al-Akhir (The Last), indicating a beginningless and endless existence. Allah exists without place, time, or spatial constraints, as nothing resembles Him.” Humans use our limited concepts of reality to think of something that we can not possibly have any concept about.

You’re already assuming God exists, and that’s exactly the point Richard Dawkins is challenging. The debate isn’t “what is God like,” it’s “what evidence is there that God exists at all.”!!!!!!!!!!’ Defining God as beyond time, space, and reality doesn’t prove anything it just makes the claim impossible to test. That’s why Piers Morgan seems to “struggle” because the claim is being assumed, not demonstrated.

I am assuming “something exists” and it doesn’t matter how you call it. What is the evidence God exist? Fine-tuned parameters of the Universe, if they were just slightly off life wouldn’t be possible. Scientists who believe in God confirm that there seems to be “an intelligent creator”. But is there any direct evidence? No, not really. But what evidence would you need? I mean, how do you know anything for that matter? If a doctor gives you pills do you take them? How do you know they will work? Can you be sure it’s the right pills? Do you check with every prescription? What if they made a mistake at the pharmacy and used a wrong container or a wrong label? Do you perform lab analysis of the actual pills to check what they actually contain? Or you “just take them”? Seems to be like faith more than anything, especially knowing the wrong pills/qty combo could quite literally kill a person. So you can’t know if taking the pills heals you or kills you, you “only” BELIEVE that your doc didn’t make a mistake, the pharmacist didn’t make a mistake, containers are correct and I could continue. People go through their everyday with just beliefs and faith while not even realizing. They assume “most likely scenario” and use it as a substitute for “knowing” But the moment you mention anything about God or a divine Creator they want 100% proof which doesn’t even really exist. So the real question is, what’s more likely? Is there a Creator, God, an entity that can be best described as omnipotent, all-knowing, timeless, above worldly who caused our existence, defines purpose and the fate of our lives and decides what happens after? How else would you explain consciousness? Seems pretty solid idea compared to: Universe “just happened to somehow get created”, with the perfect settings to allow life to form. Somehow consciousness it a think with humans but everything else is just a bio-machine, insect just few neurons not too different from us just way less, but that’s not conscious. Where do you then draw the line? What’s soul? Is there even something like that? If so, where? If not how the hell are we conscious then? What happens after death? We just stop existing? Go where? If you know physics you know something doesn’t just disappear. Fine our bodies decompose but again, our consciousness? I could continue like that. I think not believing in a Creator is way less logical, “scientific” and creates just more questions. And maybe not having 100% proof is exactly the point of faith itself. If people could directly prove God, with 100% certainty belief, faith would become pointless. That’s all for my rant

I used to hold out for old Piers, I guess I’m going to have to retire him from my feed. He just undressed himself. 1). I’m not sure he understands logic to begin with. 2). It’s conjecture to think there was anything before the big bang. (It’s a theory which until recently was the theory was carried forward from 1927. Proposed by Belgian physicist Georges Lemaître. It’s just a theory! 3). Followers of this theory postulate that before the bb there wasn’t “time” obviously because there wasn’t mass. E=mc^2

@kaizen000000000 "Destroyed" His presupposition is exposed so he tried to outlaw the exposure. "There was nothing before the big bang, even time didn't exist, you can't use that against me!"

@kaizen000000000 What came before god? Why can’t a bang appear like a god apparently just appeared? Or “always was.” No “before god” is equally incomprehensible as “before” bang bang.

@kaizen000000000 "What was before the time has begun?" is just as nonsensical question like as "What is north of the North Pole?"

What a nonsensical argument. If our brains were not built to understand the universe how is it that we became to have some understanding of the universe, and why do we care to in the first place if we were just meant to ‘survive on the African Plains’. Why is it that a physicists brain is an exemption to this rule. The big picture is physics was made intentionally obscure and purposely as nonsensical and confusing in order to attract people who will only stick to the dogma to stop the advancement of it. It’s been admitted the US government silo’s certain areas of physics to stop its advancement. For a guy who battled against religion his whole life modern physics functions EXACTLY like one. Show me physical proof of string theory, you’ll get a man with an abstract series of equations telling you his book proves it. Exactly like if you asked a Christian show me the physical existence of God they will pull out their book and use it as proof. They will cite scripture (physicists will derive string theory equations then say something retarded like “and that’s why the universe is made up of mostly matter we can’t see, detect, measure, or thoroughly explain). It’s pretty simple, they made a left turn somewhere instead of a right and until they are willing to admit it, they will continue to be more dogmatic about their arguments.

@kaizen000000000 I get it. The “before” was quantum fluctuations. The Blueprint for our universe. It came from Mind. That mind “ created” Time.

@kaizen000000000 If you can’t comprehend that there’s no before the big bang, how does that same mind comprehend a God? Why is it that G go od is accepted on faith alone but not that time didn’t exist before the Big Bang? 😂