Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

piews exlusive

penyegaran

4,442 subscribers

84,391 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

piews exlusive

Sensitive content

piews exlusive

penyegaran

84,116 views • 2 months ago

Piews exclusive dm

Sensitive content

Piews exclusive dm

Exclusiveku.id

194,610 views • 1 month ago

Piews exclusive dm

Sensitive content

Piews exclusive dm

Exclusiveku.id

40,887 views • 4 days ago

Piews - Netha exclusive

Sensitive content

Piews - Netha exclusive

Exclusiveku.id

73,009 views • 13 days ago

piews & netha🤤

Sensitive content

piews & netha🤤

penyegaran

18,119 views • 20 days ago

cucumilo exlusive #trend #fyp #exlusive

cucumilo exlusive #trend #fyp #exlusive

Hotnews18+

21,553 views • 3 months ago

netha exlusive

netha exlusive

penyegaran

45,456 views • 2 months ago

Join group exlusive

Join group exlusive

Cherrytoxicc

40,895 views • 14 days ago

nanaurmine exlusive

nanaurmine exlusive

penyegaran

18,686 views • 2 months ago

nanaurmine exlusive

nanaurmine exlusive

penyegaran

28,226 views • 2 months ago

nanat tiktok exlusive

nanat tiktok exlusive

penyegaran

19,490 views • 2 months ago

Cucumilo exlusive #ekslusif #viral #tobrut #fyp

Cucumilo exlusive #ekslusif #viral #tobrut #fyp

Hotnews18+

17,225 views • 3 months ago

✨️💙 "Al miedo no se vence, se convence". 💙✨️¿Ustedes qué opinan? #Exlusive #BluePage #Why_Not #Actor #JorgeOrtín #YES #feelings

✨️💙 "Al miedo no se vence, se convence". 💙✨️¿Ustedes qué opinan? #Exlusive #BluePage #Why_Not #Actor #JorgeOrtín #YES #feelings

Jorge Ortín

36,530 views • 2 years ago

YOU CAN GET THE FREE UMBRELLA ON EVERY UPCOMING COMMUNITY DAY 👀 The other style will be EXLUSIVE for ONLY the Community Day on May 30, 2026. We also could get more styles with each upcoming CD #Fortnite | Video AmyFNLeaks

YOU CAN GET THE FREE UMBRELLA ON EVERY UPCOMING COMMUNITY DAY 👀 The other style will be EXLUSIVE for ONLY the Community Day on May 30, 2026. We also could get more styles with each upcoming CD #Fortnite | Video AmyFNLeaks

Backers | Fortnite News

96,677 views • 5 months ago

Beyoncé owns the masters to her entire solo catalog. She released albums under Parkwood Ent since 4, 2011 and she re-upped her deal by signing an exlusive licensing agreement for her entire solo catalog acquiring her masters and using Columbia for global distribution

Beyoncé owns the masters to her entire solo catalog. She released albums under Parkwood Ent since 4, 2011 and she re-upped her deal by signing an exlusive licensing agreement for her entire solo catalog acquiring her masters and using Columbia for global distribution

Beyoncé's Apprentice | Fan Account

135,571 views • 5 months ago

Charli xcx, Aidan Zamiri, Finn Keane and friends as French for Halloween.

Charli xcx, Aidan Zamiri, Finn Keane and friends as French for Halloween.

Info Charli xcx

31,143 views • 2 days ago

Yankees strike first Austin Wells drives in George Lombard Jr. for the first run! #Postseason

Yankees strike first Austin Wells drives in George Lombard Jr. for the first run! #Postseason

MLB

178,966 views • 1 month ago

Kissing someone who yearns for you is everything , he’s almost eating her up🥹.

Sensitive content

Kissing someone who yearns for you is everything , he’s almost eating her up🥹.

BigSandro7

452,463 views • 2 months ago

It was not a political event tonight. It was a National event. 😊❤️🇲🇻 No more hatred. No more division. Let us all put behind our grudges and move forward for the betterment of our beloved country. #DhiveheengeMajlis

It was not a political event tonight. It was a National event. 😊❤️🇲🇻 No more hatred. No more division. Let us all put behind our grudges and move forward for the betterment of our beloved country. #DhiveheengeMajlis

Malsha

16,482 views • 2 years ago

An Open Letter to the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan TD Dublin, 12 September 2026 and the Middle East, April 2024. Different locations, but the same calculated spectacle: the public burning of the American flag. Such scenes have long been associated with hostile anti-American demonstrations and extremist movements abroad. How did this conduct become normalised on the streets of Ireland during a visit by the President of the United States? Minister, This is not about whether people are entitled to oppose President Donald Trump, criticise American foreign policy or demonstrate against the United States. They plainly are. Nor is it a demand that offensive political expression be prohibited merely because many people find it repugnant. It concerns what happened when members of a masked political organisation set an American flag alight in the middle of a crowded Dublin demonstration and whether the State applied the same public-order, fire-safety and criminal-law standards that would govern any other protest. The Dublin demonstration The Irish Times reported that members of Anti-Imperialist Action Ireland appeared as a masked breakaway group dressed in black clothing and dark glasses. According to that report, the group burned an American flag, set off firecrackers, chanted against the presence of US troops at Shannon and used militant republican slogans before dispersing. Anti-Imperialist Action Ireland subsequently stated on its own X account that its members had attended the anti-Trump protest in Dublin city centre. Its post included video footage apparently showing the flag burning. This is therefore not an unattributed image or an unsupported social-media rumour. The organisation publicly placed its members at the demonstration and circulated footage of the incident. Burning a flag as an act of political expression is one question. Deliberately setting an object alight and discharging firecrackers within a tightly packed public gathering raise additional questions about public safety and public-order policing. Was the person responsible identified? Was an investigation opened? Did Gardaí assess whether members of the public were endangered? A developing pattern This incident cannot be viewed entirely in isolation. On 29 August 2026, Anti-Imperialist Action Ireland publicly claimed that its members had spray-painted the entrance of the Institute of International and European Affairs in Dublin. The door and porch were marked with anti-NATO slogans and the organisation’s initials shortly before the building was due to host NATO Deputy Secretary General Radmila Šekerinska. That was not merely disagreement expressed through speeches, placards or lawful assembly. It was the deliberate defacement of property associated with an event the organisation opposed. The organisation has also been publicly associated with other destructive or confrontational actions involving political symbols and buildings, including the burning of flags and remembrance material, the defacement of the Royal British Legion’s Dublin headquarters and the painting-over of street signs bearing Queen Victoria’s name. These incidents display a recurring method: masked participants, militant republican imagery, the destruction of political symbols and direct action against property connected with organisations or events they oppose. Paramilitary-style presentation Anti-Imperialist Action Ireland should not casually be described as “the IRA.” The Provisional IRA is a specific unlawful organisation. AIA is a separate socialist-republican organisation founded in 2017, and I have seen no evidence establishing that AIA is itself proscribed or engaged in an armed campaign. Nevertheless, its conduct and presentation warrant serious examination. Masks, black clothing, dark glasses, disciplined group formations and militant republican language create an unmistakably paramilitary-style appearance. The organisation invokes revolutionary republican traditions, rejects the Good Friday Agreement and uses language centred upon “resistance” to institutions it describes as imperialist. That visual and rhetorical presentation appears calculated to evoke continuity with militant republicanism. It does not prove terrorism or membership of an unlawful organisation, but neither should the State pretend that the resemblance is accidental or meaningless. Political beliefs—even extreme and deeply offensive ones are protected. Criminal damage, unlawful entry, intimidation and conduct endangering the public are not transformed into protected expression merely because those responsible call them political protest. Symbols associated with terrorist organisations There is a further and increasingly disturbing context. People have been filmed walking openly through Dublin carrying flags and wearing banners or headbands apparently displaying insignia associated with Hamas and Hezbollah. Hamas appears on the European Union’s terrorist list. In Hezbollah’s case, the EU designation applies specifically to its military wing. These legal distinctions matter. Displaying a flag does not, by itself, prove that its carrier is a member of, or providing material support to, either organisation. Nevertheless, these are not neutral emblems of Palestinian identity or ordinary criticism of Israeli policy. They are symbols associated with organisations involved in political violence and included within the European Union’s counterterrorism framework. Their increasingly open display in Dublin alongside masked political formations, firecrackers, flag burning and repeated property defacement raises legitimate public-order and national-security questions. The issue is not whether Gardaí should arrest someone merely for carrying an offensive flag. It is whether the symbols were correctly identified, whether the surrounding conduct crossed any criminal threshold and whether Garda intelligence is examining possible recruitment, fundraising, coordination or material support. A domestic legal question Ireland does not appear to have separately designated Hamas or Hezbollah as unlawful organisations under the domestic Offences Against the State framework, despite being bound by the European Union’s terrorist-list and financial-sanctions regime. If that understanding is incorrect, the Minister should identify the applicable domestic designation and explain its practical effect. If it is correct, another question arises: what legal consequences follow when symbols apparently associated with EU-listed terrorist organisations are displayed openly on Irish streets? Ireland should have a clear legal and operational framework for distinguishing merely offensive expression from conduct indicating recruitment, fundraising, coordination or material assistance. If Ireland relies upon EU designations for financial sanctions but has not separately designated these organisations under domestic law, the Minister should explain why and whether that distinction leaves any enforcement gap. The public is entitled to know whether Gardaí possess the powers, training and guidance necessary to respond appropriately when symbols associated with EU-listed terrorist organisations appear openly at demonstrations in Dublin. Questions requiring answers I therefore ask the Minister: • Did An Garda Síochána witness or receive reports of the American flag being burned in Dublin on 12 September? • Was the person who set the flag alight identified? • Were the discharge of firecrackers and the lighting of a fire within a crowded demonstration assessed as public-safety or public-order matters? • Were any arrests made, statements taken or investigations opened? • Did Anti-Imperialist Action Ireland notify Gardaí that its members would attend as an organised group? • Has the defacement of the IIEA building been investigated, and have any suspects been identified? • Have previous acts of property defacement publicly claimed by the organisation resulted in investigation, prosecution or sanction? • Has An Garda Síochána assessed whether AIA has any organisational, financial or personnel connections with an unlawful organisation? • Are its masked formations and repeated direct actions being monitored for possible escalation? • Have Gardaí authenticated footage apparently showing Hamas and Hezbollah symbols being displayed in Dublin? • Is there any evidence of recruitment, fundraising, coordination or material support connected with these displays? • What guidance is provided to Gardaí for distinguishing offensive but lawful expression from conduct amounting to support for terrorism? • Does the Minister believe that existing public-order, criminal-damage and counterterrorism legislation is adequate and being applied consistently? I recognise that the Minister cannot direct individual Garda investigations. Nevertheless, the Minister is responsible for justice policy and may seek assurances that the law is adequate and being applied consistently. The issue for Ireland The comparison between Dublin in September 2026 and the Middle East in April 2024 is not intended to suggest that everyone who burns an American flag is a terrorist. It demonstrates something more precise: a confrontational spectacle strongly associated with hostile anti-American movements abroad was deliberately reproduced in Ireland during a presidential visit. Ireland can protect robust political expression without becoming indifferent to organised groups concealing their identities, adopting paramilitary-style presentation, damaging property or introducing fire and firecrackers into crowded demonstrations. The question is not whether these people are entitled to dislike America, NATO or President Trump. The question is whether the State distinguishes clearly between lawful protest and dangerous or destructive conduct and whether that distinction is enforced equally, regardless of the political ideology involved. Anti-Imperialist Action Ireland has publicly placed its members at the Dublin protest and circulated footage apparently showing the flag burning. It has also claimed responsibility for defacing the IIEA entrance. The State should now explain what action, if any, followed these incidents and whether Ireland’s laws are adequate to address an organised pattern of masked, confrontational and destructive political activity. Silence is not an adequate public response. Keira Connolly

An Open Letter to the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan TD Dublin, 12 September 2026 and the Middle East, April 2024. Different locations, but the same calculated spectacle: the public burning of the American flag. Such scenes have long been associated with hostile anti-American demonstrations and extremist movements abroad. How did this conduct become normalised on the streets of Ireland during a visit by the President of the United States? Minister, This is not about whether people are entitled to oppose President Donald Trump, criticise American foreign policy or demonstrate against the United States. They plainly are. Nor is it a demand that offensive political expression be prohibited merely because many people find it repugnant. It concerns what happened when members of a masked political organisation set an American flag alight in the middle of a crowded Dublin demonstration and whether the State applied the same public-order, fire-safety and criminal-law standards that would govern any other protest. The Dublin demonstration The Irish Times reported that members of Anti-Imperialist Action Ireland appeared as a masked breakaway group dressed in black clothing and dark glasses. According to that report, the group burned an American flag, set off firecrackers, chanted against the presence of US troops at Shannon and used militant republican slogans before dispersing. Anti-Imperialist Action Ireland subsequently stated on its own X account that its members had attended the anti-Trump protest in Dublin city centre. Its post included video footage apparently showing the flag burning. This is therefore not an unattributed image or an unsupported social-media rumour. The organisation publicly placed its members at the demonstration and circulated footage of the incident. Burning a flag as an act of political expression is one question. Deliberately setting an object alight and discharging firecrackers within a tightly packed public gathering raise additional questions about public safety and public-order policing. Was the person responsible identified? Was an investigation opened? Did Gardaí assess whether members of the public were endangered? A developing pattern This incident cannot be viewed entirely in isolation. On 29 August 2026, Anti-Imperialist Action Ireland publicly claimed that its members had spray-painted the entrance of the Institute of International and European Affairs in Dublin. The door and porch were marked with anti-NATO slogans and the organisation’s initials shortly before the building was due to host NATO Deputy Secretary General Radmila Šekerinska. That was not merely disagreement expressed through speeches, placards or lawful assembly. It was the deliberate defacement of property associated with an event the organisation opposed. The organisation has also been publicly associated with other destructive or confrontational actions involving political symbols and buildings, including the burning of flags and remembrance material, the defacement of the Royal British Legion’s Dublin headquarters and the painting-over of street signs bearing Queen Victoria’s name. These incidents display a recurring method: masked participants, militant republican imagery, the destruction of political symbols and direct action against property connected with organisations or events they oppose. Paramilitary-style presentation Anti-Imperialist Action Ireland should not casually be described as “the IRA.” The Provisional IRA is a specific unlawful organisation. AIA is a separate socialist-republican organisation founded in 2017, and I have seen no evidence establishing that AIA is itself proscribed or engaged in an armed campaign. Nevertheless, its conduct and presentation warrant serious examination. Masks, black clothing, dark glasses, disciplined group formations and militant republican language create an unmistakably paramilitary-style appearance. The organisation invokes revolutionary republican traditions, rejects the Good Friday Agreement and uses language centred upon “resistance” to institutions it describes as imperialist. That visual and rhetorical presentation appears calculated to evoke continuity with militant republicanism. It does not prove terrorism or membership of an unlawful organisation, but neither should the State pretend that the resemblance is accidental or meaningless. Political beliefs—even extreme and deeply offensive ones are protected. Criminal damage, unlawful entry, intimidation and conduct endangering the public are not transformed into protected expression merely because those responsible call them political protest. Symbols associated with terrorist organisations There is a further and increasingly disturbing context. People have been filmed walking openly through Dublin carrying flags and wearing banners or headbands apparently displaying insignia associated with Hamas and Hezbollah. Hamas appears on the European Union’s terrorist list. In Hezbollah’s case, the EU designation applies specifically to its military wing. These legal distinctions matter. Displaying a flag does not, by itself, prove that its carrier is a member of, or providing material support to, either organisation. Nevertheless, these are not neutral emblems of Palestinian identity or ordinary criticism of Israeli policy. They are symbols associated with organisations involved in political violence and included within the European Union’s counterterrorism framework. Their increasingly open display in Dublin alongside masked political formations, firecrackers, flag burning and repeated property defacement raises legitimate public-order and national-security questions. The issue is not whether Gardaí should arrest someone merely for carrying an offensive flag. It is whether the symbols were correctly identified, whether the surrounding conduct crossed any criminal threshold and whether Garda intelligence is examining possible recruitment, fundraising, coordination or material support. A domestic legal question Ireland does not appear to have separately designated Hamas or Hezbollah as unlawful organisations under the domestic Offences Against the State framework, despite being bound by the European Union’s terrorist-list and financial-sanctions regime. If that understanding is incorrect, the Minister should identify the applicable domestic designation and explain its practical effect. If it is correct, another question arises: what legal consequences follow when symbols apparently associated with EU-listed terrorist organisations are displayed openly on Irish streets? Ireland should have a clear legal and operational framework for distinguishing merely offensive expression from conduct indicating recruitment, fundraising, coordination or material assistance. If Ireland relies upon EU designations for financial sanctions but has not separately designated these organisations under domestic law, the Minister should explain why and whether that distinction leaves any enforcement gap. The public is entitled to know whether Gardaí possess the powers, training and guidance necessary to respond appropriately when symbols associated with EU-listed terrorist organisations appear openly at demonstrations in Dublin. Questions requiring answers I therefore ask the Minister: • Did An Garda Síochána witness or receive reports of the American flag being burned in Dublin on 12 September? • Was the person who set the flag alight identified? • Were the discharge of firecrackers and the lighting of a fire within a crowded demonstration assessed as public-safety or public-order matters? • Were any arrests made, statements taken or investigations opened? • Did Anti-Imperialist Action Ireland notify Gardaí that its members would attend as an organised group? • Has the defacement of the IIEA building been investigated, and have any suspects been identified? • Have previous acts of property defacement publicly claimed by the organisation resulted in investigation, prosecution or sanction? • Has An Garda Síochána assessed whether AIA has any organisational, financial or personnel connections with an unlawful organisation? • Are its masked formations and repeated direct actions being monitored for possible escalation? • Have Gardaí authenticated footage apparently showing Hamas and Hezbollah symbols being displayed in Dublin? • Is there any evidence of recruitment, fundraising, coordination or material support connected with these displays? • What guidance is provided to Gardaí for distinguishing offensive but lawful expression from conduct amounting to support for terrorism? • Does the Minister believe that existing public-order, criminal-damage and counterterrorism legislation is adequate and being applied consistently? I recognise that the Minister cannot direct individual Garda investigations. Nevertheless, the Minister is responsible for justice policy and may seek assurances that the law is adequate and being applied consistently. The issue for Ireland The comparison between Dublin in September 2026 and the Middle East in April 2024 is not intended to suggest that everyone who burns an American flag is a terrorist. It demonstrates something more precise: a confrontational spectacle strongly associated with hostile anti-American movements abroad was deliberately reproduced in Ireland during a presidential visit. Ireland can protect robust political expression without becoming indifferent to organised groups concealing their identities, adopting paramilitary-style presentation, damaging property or introducing fire and firecrackers into crowded demonstrations. The question is not whether these people are entitled to dislike America, NATO or President Trump. The question is whether the State distinguishes clearly between lawful protest and dangerous or destructive conduct and whether that distinction is enforced equally, regardless of the political ideology involved. Anti-Imperialist Action Ireland has publicly placed its members at the Dublin protest and circulated footage apparently showing the flag burning. It has also claimed responsibility for defacing the IIEA entrance. The State should now explain what action, if any, followed these incidents and whether Ireland’s laws are adequate to address an organised pattern of masked, confrontational and destructive political activity. Silence is not an adequate public response. Keira Connolly

Keira Connolly

12,812 views • 1 month ago