正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Pitch clock: 15 seconds ⏱️ Jack Dreyer solves a Rubik’s Cube in 13 😮‍💨🧩 Spring Training content idea? 👀⚾️

19,489 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The complete playbook for building profitable companies in the AI age 1. Go heads down 2. Find an underserved niche + trend backed by data (start small) 3. Learn their painpoints/what content drives them 4. Come up with an idea (or steal one from Idea Browser) 5. Build an audience/community (pick 1 platform) 6. Use Manus/v0/Bolt/Lovable/Cursor to build v1 7. DM your audience, offer a discounted version 8. Reinvest that cash to fund product/content flywheel 9. Keep team small (AI is your co-founder) 10. Automate ~90%+ with agents/zaps etc 11. Reinvest profits into content + core features 12. Partner with creators in exchange for equity (1–20%) or rev share (20–50%) 13. Keep surfacing new ideas from users + trends (use agent feature on pro Idea Browser) 14. Build public-facing tools to drive top-of-funnel 15. Add modular pricing: free → $29 → $299 → $3K 16. Turn manual services into productized features 17. Build in public to attract users, partners, and acquirers 18. Bundle into an ecosystem, not just a single feature 19. Own the loop: audience → product → content → more audience 20. Run sprints on retention (fix that leaky bucket) 21. Backfill with AI agents before hiring ops roles 22. Test new channels with throwaway brands 23. Monetize the backend, sell data, leads, APIs if applicable 24. Have fun 25. Repeat. Build a portfolio 26. Share hires, tools, and infrastructure across products 27. Acquire underperforming products with distribution upside 28. Relaunch or bundle existing apps using your playbook 29. Create a holding company brand people want to follow (this is exactly what im doing, practicing what im preaching) 30. Build long-term wealth with no outside investors and infinite spins 31. Cross-promote wins across your product ecosystem to drive flywheel growth 32. Create an internal idea-to-launch pipeline (every 30 days, something ships) 33. License or clone successful products into new verticals or geos 34. Recruit niche operators to run individual products for cash + upside/profitshare 35. Build once, compound forever... audience, code, and trust all stack This is the greatest time to be an idea person. Happy building.

GREG ISENBERG

89,924 次观看 • 1 年前

Jack Keane is a retired four-star American general, former Vice Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, and a recognized national security expert, Fox News analyst, and chairman of the Institute for the Study of War. Host: Even as he focuses on trade, the president isn't forgetting the peace agreements. He's hoping for China's support regarding Russia in Ukraine. However, he recently abandoned the idea of ​​supplying Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine. Listen. Tomahawk missiles require a long training period. A year of intensive training is needed to master them. We can do it, but we won't train others. That would be... that's too remote a prospect. The NATO Secretary General supported the president, saying no weapon would change the course of the war. But Russia was concerned about the possibility of Ukraine receiving it. As for training, doesn't the U.S. already supply systems that require training? I mean F-16s, M1 Abrams tanks, Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, HIMARS. What's the difference, and does Ukraine really need a year to learn how to use Tomahawks? Jack Keane: Well, I think to train someone in an American school after basic training takes six months to a year. That applies to training on tanks, Patriot batteries, or other equipment. But for the Ukrainians, we have very compact programs. They don't just learn on weekdays. They work seven days a week, 14-15 hours a day, Jackie. And these programs, even the compact ones, would take six weeks for Tomahawks, but they probably do it faster. They've exceeded our expectations in everything we've given them. M1 tanks, HIMARS, ATACMS, Patriot missiles. And why? War sharpens the mind. They approach it with incredible determination, and that's completely understandable. There was never a weapon system we wanted to give them where training would have been a barrier to deployment. Maybe there are other reasons, but I don't think that should be the reason. The president probably has information that, in my opinion, is inconsistent with our experience with the Ukrainians and what we would do with that system. Look, so what's the problem? The problem is that Russia has a safe haven beyond the reach of all available weapons systems from the US, Europe, and Ukraine. Aside from drones, they can't reach them. The main target is the Shahed drone production center in Alabuzi. These are drones that fly in swarms of 500-800 at night, attacking mainly major cities in Ukraine. This is a very serious problem. This center was built by Iranians. 20,000 North Koreans [?] work there. And that's target number one. Other targets are bomber bases that fire missiles at Ukrainian cities and civilians. That's why Ukraine wants these weapons. Observers like myself believe that this is precisely why we must provide them. It makes no sense to deny the Ukrainians the opportunity to protect their population when Putin has carried out the main escalation of the war against the civilian population.

Jürgen Nauditt 🇩🇪🇺🇦

35,558 次观看 • 8 个月前