正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Pixel Flamboyant! Last one of the batch! #dispatch

Fera Animations

16,848 subscribers

16,838 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

游戏艺术 #dispatch

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Weirdest one of the batch, Bubble Bash Blitzcrank preview is live! #LeagueOfLegends

Weirdest one of the batch, Bubble Bash Blitzcrank preview is live! #LeagueOfLegends

SkinSpotlights

30,876 次观看 • 7 个月前

Signing my last batch of UFC Panini cards for 2023

Signing my last batch of UFC Panini cards for 2023

Georges St-Pierre

139,089 次观看 • 2 年前

From my interesting (or not) case files. #yesCCT #CardioTwitter #MedTwitter What is the diagnosis? Be specific please. This should be the last one of the batch. Enjoy 🥰 Polling on management below.

From my interesting (or not) case files. #yesCCT #CardioTwitter #MedTwitter What is the diagnosis? Be specific please. This should be the last one of the batch. Enjoy 🥰 Polling on management below.

Quynh Truong

20,519 次观看 • 3 年前

A snippet of the breakdown I prepared for the Breaking Bad Cinematic - The Last Batch. Watch the full video here: #cgi #breakdown #3danimation

A snippet of the breakdown I prepared for the Breaking Bad Cinematic - The Last Batch. Watch the full video here: #cgi #breakdown #3danimation

Piotr Tatar

116,783 次观看 • 2 年前

Who did you pick to dance in the latest episode of Dispatch? #Dispatch Invisigal or Blonde Blazer?

Who did you pick to dance in the latest episode of Dispatch? #Dispatch Invisigal or Blonde Blazer?

No Context Dispatch

774,327 次观看 • 1 年前

Phenomaman is fucking hilarious. Gotta wait to play the last episode until after work 🥲 #Dispatch

Phenomaman is fucking hilarious. Gotta wait to play the last episode until after work 🥲 #Dispatch

Stephen

380,220 次观看 • 1 年前

Happy birthday to Mandy! Her birthday is the 11th of August according to the Dispatch phone ARG #dispatch #blondeblazer #mechablazer

Happy birthday to Mandy! Her birthday is the 11th of August according to the Dispatch phone ARG #dispatch #blondeblazer #mechablazer

Blonde Blazer Posting

17,788 次观看 • 3 个月前

“The Cardinals are one of the biggest organizations in baseball, and if I was the front office I'd be hungry to own this division, but we haven't owned this division the last two years." Willson took the words right out of my mouth. (🎥 St. Louis Post-Dispatch) #ForTheLou

“The Cardinals are one of the biggest organizations in baseball, and if I was the front office I'd be hungry to own this division, but we haven't owned this division the last two years." Willson took the words right out of my mouth. (🎥 St. Louis Post-Dispatch) #ForTheLou

Gateway Grinders

227,509 次观看 • 2 年前

it seems like hyunjae received a basket of blue roses from the entire production staff of his upcoming variety show, “아이돌 파견근무” (idol dispatch work) 🥹💙 “the boyz ‘hyunjae’ is the ‘future’ of idol dispatch work” - from all the production staff of idol dispatch work - #현재 #HYUNJAE #더보이즈 #THEBOYZ

it seems like hyunjae received a basket of blue roses from the entire production staff of his upcoming variety show, “아이돌 파견근무” (idol dispatch work) 🥹💙 “the boyz ‘hyunjae’ is the ‘future’ of idol dispatch work” - from all the production staff of idol dispatch work - #현재 #HYUNJAE #더보이즈 #THEBOYZ

For Hyunjae

18,911 次观看 • 5 个月前

Aliasing vs anti-aliasing. On the left, we simply test if a pixel center (in green) is inside the circle (red). On the right, we check how close the pixel is to the circle edge and blend one pixel width.

Aliasing vs anti-aliasing. On the left, we simply test if a pixel center (in green) is inside the circle (red). On the right, we check how close the pixel is to the circle edge and blend one pixel width.

Xor

92,465 次观看 • 1 年前

I'm building this game LITERALLY one pixel at the time... #screenshotsaturday

I'm building this game LITERALLY one pixel at the time... #screenshotsaturday

Juhana Myllys

51,036 次观看 • 2 年前

What does the "average" Cryptopunk look like? I built a web tool to show you. 10,000 CryptoPunks. One source pixel each. A single deterministic composite you can inspect pixel by pixel.

What does the "average" Cryptopunk look like? I built a web tool to show you. 10,000 CryptoPunks. One source pixel each. A single deterministic composite you can inspect pixel by pixel.

jeremy.eth

59,423 次观看 • 5 个月前

The fifth batch of flour: 320 bags.

The fifth batch of flour: 320 bags.

Care For Gaza

4,828,665 次观看 • 2 年前

Flamboyant cuttlefish hatching

Flamboyant cuttlefish hatching

Science girl

33,044 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 Last night, the Senate CONFIRMED a batch of 97 more Trump nominees. In 2025, we confirmed 417 members of President Trump’s team— clearing over 90% of the backlog. By comparison, in year one: Joe Biden got 41% of his civilian noms, while Trump 1.0 got 57%. More to do. 🇺🇸

🚨 Last night, the Senate CONFIRMED a batch of 97 more Trump nominees. In 2025, we confirmed 417 members of President Trump’s team— clearing over 90% of the backlog. By comparison, in year one: Joe Biden got 41% of his civilian noms, while Trump 1.0 got 57%. More to do. 🇺🇸

Markwayne Mullin

321,947 次观看 • 10 个月前

Batch Normalization by hand ✍️ ~ 7 steps walkthrough below Batch normalization is common practice for improving training and achieving faster convergence. It sounds simple. But it is often misunderstood. 🤔 Does batch normalization involve trainable parameters, tunable hyper-parameters, or both? 🤔 Is batch normalization applied to inputs, features, weights, biases, or outputs? 🤔 How is batch normalization different from layer normalization? So I drew and calculated one entirely by hand. Goal: normalize a mini-batch of 4 examples to mean 0 and variance 1, then let the network scale it back. = 1. Given = A mini-batch of 4 training examples, each with 3 features. = 2. Linear layer = Let us multiply by the weights and add the biases. Batch norm sits after this, which answers the second question: what gets normalized is features, not inputs, weights or biases. = 3. ReLU = We apply the activation, and -2 becomes 0. Negative values are suppressed before any statistic is taken. = 4. Batch statistics = Let us compute the sum, mean, variance and standard deviation, one row at a time. A row is a feature and the four columns are the four examples, so every number here measures one feature against the rest of the batch. That is the "batch" in batch normalization, and it is exactly what layer normalization does not do. The statistics are rounded to whole numbers, which is what keeps the rest of the page doable in pen. = 5. Shift to mean 0 = We subtract the mean, in green. The four values in each feature now average to zero. = 6. Scale to variance 1 = Let us divide by the standard deviation, in orange. Each feature now has variance one, whatever scale it arrived at. = 7. Scale and shift = We multiply by a linear transformation and pass the result on. The diagonal and the last column are trainable, so having just forced every feature to mean 0 and variance 1, we hand the network the means to undo it. The outputs: Mean of each feature = [2, 1, 2] Std dev of each feature = [1, 1, 2] To the next layer = [2, -2, 2, 0], [-3, 3, 6, -3], [2, 0, 1, 2] The answers: 🤔 Both. The scale and shift are trainable, the statistics are not. Epsilon and the momentum on the running statistics are the hyper-parameters, and one mini-batch by hand needs neither. 🤔 Features, after the linear layer, not inputs, weights or biases. 🤔 Batch norm measures across the batch, one feature at a time. Layer norm measures across the features, one example at a time. 💾 Save this post!

Batch Normalization by hand ✍️ ~ 7 steps walkthrough below Batch normalization is common practice for improving training and achieving faster convergence. It sounds simple. But it is often misunderstood. 🤔 Does batch normalization involve trainable parameters, tunable hyper-parameters, or both? 🤔 Is batch normalization applied to inputs, features, weights, biases, or outputs? 🤔 How is batch normalization different from layer normalization? So I drew and calculated one entirely by hand. Goal: normalize a mini-batch of 4 examples to mean 0 and variance 1, then let the network scale it back. = 1. Given = A mini-batch of 4 training examples, each with 3 features. = 2. Linear layer = Let us multiply by the weights and add the biases. Batch norm sits after this, which answers the second question: what gets normalized is features, not inputs, weights or biases. = 3. ReLU = We apply the activation, and -2 becomes 0. Negative values are suppressed before any statistic is taken. = 4. Batch statistics = Let us compute the sum, mean, variance and standard deviation, one row at a time. A row is a feature and the four columns are the four examples, so every number here measures one feature against the rest of the batch. That is the "batch" in batch normalization, and it is exactly what layer normalization does not do. The statistics are rounded to whole numbers, which is what keeps the rest of the page doable in pen. = 5. Shift to mean 0 = We subtract the mean, in green. The four values in each feature now average to zero. = 6. Scale to variance 1 = Let us divide by the standard deviation, in orange. Each feature now has variance one, whatever scale it arrived at. = 7. Scale and shift = We multiply by a linear transformation and pass the result on. The diagonal and the last column are trainable, so having just forced every feature to mean 0 and variance 1, we hand the network the means to undo it. The outputs: Mean of each feature = [2, 1, 2] Std dev of each feature = [1, 1, 2] To the next layer = [2, -2, 2, 0], [-3, 3, 6, -3], [2, 0, 1, 2] The answers: 🤔 Both. The scale and shift are trainable, the statistics are not. Epsilon and the momentum on the running statistics are the hyper-parameters, and one mini-batch by hand needs neither. 🤔 Features, after the linear layer, not inputs, weights or biases. 🤔 Batch norm measures across the batch, one feature at a time. Layer norm measures across the features, one example at a time. 💾 Save this post!

Tom Yeh

21,021 次观看 • 3 个月前