正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Please explain, Anthony Albanese? "The Voice is inexorably linked to a coordinated approach to agreement making or treaty." "The Uluru statement is actually 18 pages." "It's all about big law firms, a lot of litigation being generated to interpret a treaty." -Megan Davis

62,615 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

After claims made by Prime Minister Albanese to Patricia Karvelas and Ben Fordham Live, downplaying Labor's support for a race-based federal treaty, I thought I would share the following footage of Mr Albanese in the House of Representative saying: "The voice must be followed by truth-telling, because, until we acknowledge the reality of our history, we are shackled to its demons. And truth must be followed by a makarrata commission. Makarrata is about conflict resolution, justice and, crucially, self-determination. It's a path to a NATIONAL TREATY that acknowledges the pre-existing rights of people in a land where sovereignty was never ceded and acknowledges that we are on what is Aboriginal land—always was, always will be." And in addition here are more quotes about Albanese’s Voice and “Federal Treaty Making.” They all come directly from Albanese, Burney and Dreyfus’ press releases, links included. Albanese press release 👇 “An Albanese Labor Government will establish a Makarrata Commission as a priority.” “It will work with a Voice to Parliament when it is established.” “The Makarrata Commission’s treaty responsibilities will initially include: Recommending a framework for federal treaty-making” Source: Burney press release 👇 “An Albanese Labor government...will also make makarrata—treaty and truth telling—a priority” “It will work with the voice to parliament when it is established.” “With respect to treaty, it would recommend a framework for federal treaty making" Source: Dreyfus press release 👇 “Labor has committed to honouring that request by establishing in government as a matter of priority a Makarrata commission.” “the commission's oversight of treaty would include developing a framework for federal treaty-making" Source:

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

194,311 次观看 • 3 年前

The Link Between Albanese's Voice and Treaty Explained in 2 Minutes! While it usually depends on the audience, the Prime Minister’s deceptive messaging on the voice has been to downplay its potential power and implications. That’s certainly what he tried with Ben Fordham the other day. He could not, would not, acknowledge the link between the voice and an indigenous treaty. “People won’t be voting on a treaty at the referendum” he said. Except that’s precisely the activist reasoning behind the voice. It’s not recognition, because indigenous Australia is widely recognised in many ways. It’s not representation, because all Australians are equally represented in this Parliament. It’s about creating a body to negotiate a treaty. No treaty was signed in Australia’s colonial era because there was no nation for the Crown to treat with. There still isn’t. So Labor will effectively make his Voice the ‘nation’ to treat with, because the very idea that a nation can have a treaty with its own citizens is nonsense. This has been confirmed by Gabrielle Appleby from the University of NSW, who said: “Voice precedes Treaty because fair, modern treaty negotiations require first the establishment of a representative Indigenous body to negotiate the rules of the game with the state. It can’t be left to the state alone, and the state must have a group of people with whom to negotiate…. Voice establishes the power for Treaty.” Since the Prime Minister is committed to voice, treaty and truth-telling, it’s about time he told the truth and stopped deceiving Australians about his personal vanity project and treaty vehicle.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

99,545 次观看 • 3 年前