Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
🚨PLEASE HELP ME SHARE THIS DISGUSTING BBC WORLD BEHAVIOR FAR AND WIDE🚨 BBC World were right to make China-based cameraman Edward Lawrence redundant. During a manufactured altercation with an aggrieved local, Edward can be heard pushing Stephen to escalate tensions: "Keep going Steve! Keep going Steve!" BBC later aired... show more
124,238 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)
10 Kommentare
BBC World, that shining example of "unbiased" journalism. They can disappear with the rest of the US old media. Nothing but pushing narratives, and lies.
Easy solution. If you lie to many times and get caught you are not credible one bit!
BBC World is a propaganda arm of the UK that there is no control over! 🤮
Censorship, right? This is the police itself reporting about this incident on Weibo, with 27.000 likes. Andy is spot-on here.
The best way the world to tackle these liars and propagandists is just to block them and don't get them any view. Best thing I have done is to totally block out those who lies for their living!
You find out when they actually get caught on cam fabricating anti-China news reports.. think about all the other times they lied and got away with it.
Just kick those guys out and thats it, for some reason these losers really think they have any kind of power in China, fuck around, find out
Disgusting Anglo bastards, trohblemakers, and genocidal 💩💩💩. Get the fck out of China! China - Keep 💩💩💩 Out!
BBC is just a shame! But they are all like that. Here in Germany as well.
digusting behaviour by the bbc.
![This is an absolutely exceptional historical testimony on the Bush administration's conduct towards China which, I think, is disclosed for the very first time. The man interviewed is is Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to Colin Powell when he was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Bush's Secretary of State. He described how during the Bush administration, there was a major internal fight between hawks (Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney) who wanted to provoke China into a war with respect to Taiwan and those who wanted to keep the peace (Colin Powell and Richard Hass, assisted by Bush himself). For instance he describes how "when Chen Shui-bian was threatening to hold an independence referendum in Taiwan" he together with Powell and Haas were telling Wang Yi "don't listen to Chen Shui-bian because he is not going to be allowed to do that, we will prevent him from doing that." Meanwhile "Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney were sending an emissary to Taipei, almost weekly, to tell Chen Shui-bian to keep on, to keep doing it. They wanted to cross that red line which they knew was a red line China would honor..." This situation was ultimately resolved when Bush got informed and decided to publicly rebuke Chen Shui-bian. He said the situation was such that "we had to fight to the nail against the Vice-President and the Secretary of Defense from developing a new cold war with China. That's what they wanted, they wanted a new cold war with China. They both saw that cold wars were very advantageous for the U.S., the defense complex and everything else, from where Cheney came... Powell spent his entire four years - the principal purpose - was keeping us out of war with China, because of what the Vice-President and the Secretary of Defense did." His conclusion: "That was how crazy that administration was. They're trying to do all these things [in the Middle-East] and at the same time they're baiting China. It's insanity, I don't know a better word for it, it's insanity. The hubris of power produced an incredible amount of insanity." The obvious two lessons here are: 1) Taiwan absolutely is a pawn the U.S. uses to provoke China, I don't think there can be any doubt when you listen this testimony... At the end of the day, they'll do - especially the DPP (Chen Shui-bian's party and that of today's president Tsai Ing-wen) - whatever the prevailing mood in the U.S. is. 2) Thankfully the more rational spirits prevailed here but it was obviously a close call, we can easily imagine a similarly insane U.S. administration without anyone to keep the insanity in check. And this would result in a war that'd have enormous ramifications for every single human being on the planet.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1731518948599091394/ext_tw_video_thumb/1731510874672861184/pu/img/O7wTo93X8YhXYfpM.jpg)
![If you want to understand Asian geopolitics today, this is an absolute must-watch. This is George Yeo, who was a Singaporean cabinet minister during 21 years, including Minister for Foreign Affairs during 7 years. In my humble opinion, very few people out there have such a subtle understanding of geopolitics in Asia as he does. Here's a quick summary of what he says: The US has little knowledge of China He says that "the US political system is decentralized and because of the need to win votes, it goes through emotional phases and is entering such a phase now where China is demonized out of mass emotion. There's some manipulation behind the scenes, but it's not based on knowledge." To him, the US "don't understand the nature of China", the fact that China "is constantly building walls around itself because it is happy in its own homogeneity". He says it is wrong for the US to believe that "China wants to displace them as the top dog in the world" and "trying to contain China, even pull it down" as a result. Not only is this a wrong understanding of China's objectives but the US "may exhaust itself in the process and I don't think it will succeed". He says that with its tariffs and sanctions the US risks making the same mistake as China's Qing dynasty and "become very weak". He believes the primacy of the US dollar will break, and that US actions are "bringing forward that day" He says that "the key event will be when the primacy of the US dollar breaks. We all know it's going to break sometime or other because it's abnormal. If it is 30 years from now, well, let's drink and be merry. But if it's five years, well, we've got to calculate, right? Do we know when the cookie will crumble? We don't know. But the way the US is moving is bringing forward that day." It's "bringing forward that day" because "they try to control countries by sanctions" and as a result more and more countries put counter-measures in place, putting themselves out of the grasp of the US. China is not in trouble and "overcapacity" is "information warfare" He says "there's information warfare against China" and that he "doesn't think" China is in trouble. "Look at the factories, look at the EVs, look at how terrified the Europeans are, accusing China of having overcapacity. I mean, how can you blame China for overcapacity when you have, when you're taking liberties with yourself, having long summers and working short hours and you say no, no, no, no, no, you are working too hard! There are consequences. If families take liberties with their children, with themselves, there's consequences." He believes that Asian societies' "wholesomeness" is an advantage versus the West "Look at Asia, look at China, look at Southeast Asia, look at India. There are people who are hardworking, who are obsessed over their children, who want to have of them a higher education, in order that the kids will have a better education, better health, a better life. [...] They'll do well and we're lucky to be in the part of the world where strange values have not taken over societies. [...] Why is America such a big market for drugs today? And I was watching the Eurovision contest... [...] Parts of it, almost satanic. But it's now part of the fashion in most of Europe. What is happening? PM Lee talked about how we should keep all these woke things away from us as much as possible. I fully agree with him. Keep our societies wholesome. Keep our families intact. I mean, AI is very important, but AI cannot answer moral questions for us. In the end, it is every individual, every child who must make the choice. Be immersed in technology. Make use of it. But have our own sense of what it means to be a human being. So if we use that as a template to judge human society, I say we are very lucky to be in a part of the world where society is by and large wholesome and will do well." It's critical for ASEAN to stick together and not be balkanized, which is what the US is trying to do with the Philippines "If we [ASEAN] don't stick together, we'll be balkanized and instead of becoming neighbours, become clients of big powers. Instead of using them, they make use of us. There's always a threat. Look at the Philippines now. The Philippines have legitimate disputes with China. Both sides have their cases. The Americans see an opportunity there. And jump in, and bring in the Japanese. And now Philippine politics is caught up in this [...] [China and the Philippines] had an agreement, a gentleman's agreement with Duterte, which Marcos has repudiated. So OK, so they must find a new way to equilibrium. And make use of the Americans and not be made use of by the Americans. But it's very difficult when you try to make use of a big power, you end up being made use of by them." Most countries in ASEAN do not want China to be an enemy For instance he says "Vietnam has made a very important decision to go with China": "it was not well reported, but Vietnam has agreed that Hanoi will be linked to Kunming and Nanning by high-speed rail. This is big because each connection is tens of billions of dollars. And will change the topological configuration of logistics and supply chain and human movement for decades to come." Same with Indonesia, noting that "Prabowo's first visit [was] to China" and that when he met Xi Jinping "it was Xiao Di talking to Da Ge. A little brother talking to big brother. But when we went to Japan, then it's brother talking to brother." He adds: "Look at the other countries, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Malaysia, Brunei. No one wants China to be an enemy. And the Americans don't understand this, yet. That because China is getting bigger and bigger for us, all of us want the Americans to be in the room. But if the Americans say no, you have to choose between China and us, then they say no, we can't. How can we choose? I mean, China is where our bread is buttered, you know."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1795332397304807646/amplify_video_thumb/1795297208633556993/img/XccnrLiJjJNMcD7S.jpg)
