Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE MY PRIVATE TELEGRAM CHANNEL. DM FOR PAYMENT DETAILS 💜 #Alter #AlterPinoy #AlterSaudi #GayArabs #SaudiGay #BeautifulCock #BigDick #SaudiCock #LegitAlter #HugeDick #LabanPinoy

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 Irish parliamentarians - TD’s and Senators - have each received email notification of an international WHO Treaty workshop scheduled @ 11am Dublin Time Monday November 27th 2023 which will be hosted on Zoom by Dr Meryl Nass and Swiss Lawyer Philip Kruse. The 90 minute workshop will be attended by parliamentarians from around the world and it is vital that Ireland has strong representation. CONTEXT The media is NOT covering the negotiations of the WHO Treaty. If passed, these new internationally binding laws will see a stripping of human rights from international health regulations and the normalization of lockdowns, bio-surveillance, vaccine passports, blanket censorship and mandatory injections. This is NOT the kind of world we want to leave behind for our children. Yet Irish political parties are in SUPPORT of the Treaty, under the disingenuous guise of favouring a multilateral approach to future pandemic preparedness. Nobody has a problem with multilateralism. But why should better co-operation between countries necessitate handing over our hard-won sovereignty and our freedoms to an unelected unaccountable untaxed unaudited Super NGO such as the modern day WHO, an organisation that is 80% controlled by private interests many of whom profited so handsomely from the Covid Pandemic. DO IT TODAY Irish recipients of this tweet please contact your local TD or Senator and INSIST they attend Monday’s workshop for parliamentarians. Copy them on this tweet, DM them, Email them. Call them. Remember, they work for us! Meeting details including Zoom links are already in their email inboxes. Everyone else please retweet. 🙏 #whotreaty #notothewho #sovereigntymatters #grassrootsireland IrishInquiry Ewan MacKenna Bring Back Normal | BBN Ryland Media Sara Haboubi Lindie Naughton Blofeld's EyeBall Κεαλαν 🗽 RVJ Callanan Dr. Anne Mc Closkey Pat Morrissey 1215 Hermann Kelly IFP gript Ivor Cummins JRD Jane A.D An Brasan 2.1 AislingOLoughlin Paul Treyvaud Paul Murphy 🇵🇸 Peadar Tóibín TD John McGuinness TD Brook Jackson 💜 LindleyMedical MERYL NASS, MD Robert W Malone, MD Robert Burke Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺 Dr. Urso Alex (Sasha) Krainer Mattias Desmet J.K. Lunden James Roguski Global Health Project

MakingSense

26,523 просмотров • 2 лет назад

New GameFi launch 🚨 This one is brought to you by the same advisory company that brought us $ADULT! The Web3 Gaming narrative is strong with tokens taking off left and right. Coinracer is a team that has been building for over a year now and has a playable game ready to go to market. What is Coinracer? Coinracer is a fast-paced, low-poly simcade racing game that features a variety of arcade game modes, being integrated into an open-world metaverse. Players begin a career and progress through it by unlocking various achievements. Features of Coinracer: • Self-sustainable microtransaction-based game economy. • FIAT on-ramping for non-crypto gamers, via partner SphereOne. • Wide vehicle selection and customization. • Extended gameplay loop with a variety of arcade game modes: Coin Race, Destruction Derby, Rally Race, FUD Ball, Pinkslip Race, and Junkyard Race. • Deep storyline with single player career mode and an open-world metaverse. • Strategic competitive play with damage mechanic and vehicle types, attributes, and tiers. • eSports tournament integrations with the leaderboard system and Coinracer Championship seasonal grand prix. • Custom ELO matchmaking system for fair and balanced competitive play. • Building with a chain agnostic approach to increase gamer onboarding and game revenue for the business and revenue share distribution; currently on BSC and launching on ETH (in discussions with AVAX, IMX, and RON regarding additional expansions). • Revenue sharing from the highly profitable game revenue. Multiple Revenue Generation Streams: • Vehicle sales • Vehicle repairs • Vehicle upgrades • Vehicle customizations • Prize pool fees • Land plots • In-game business taxes 20% of Coinracer's revenue is allocated to be shared with $CRACER token holders of 250,000 tokens or more (to prevent dilution). Marketing Activations Planned: • Team has a partnership with Reddit and has a gamer acquisition advertising campaign booked in. • Team is leveraging relationship inside the NeoTokyo network for promotional opportunities and partnerships. • Team is leveraging relationship with Beam for promotional opportunities and partnerships. • Team is closing deals with several high profile Web3 gaming content creators and streamers. Notable Partnerships: • HyperPlay: game launcher and game security audit. • SphereOne: payment processor. • 1Kin: game distribution platform. • Nexus: game discoverability platform. • Owned: game discoverability platform. • Reaktor: game launcher and tournament platform. Website Whitepaper Twitter Telegram YouTube Launch details (timer in TG) CA: 0x1c92c0295807F1f7C0726cf51A1D26298563F14A Initial max tx: 0.1% Initial tax: 20% Max tx will increase by 0.1% & tax will decrease by 1% every 10 blocks. Limits removed and final taxes (5/5%) reached roughly 30 minutes in. 🚨 Special 0xEly community offer: 0.5% of the supply is being raffled off to 10 lucky winners that share the launch announcement on Twitter & enter the raffle in the private channel. (

0xEly

48,113 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Brave Just Revealed the Future of the Internet | Roadmap 4.0 Explained | Free the Money Ep. 35 LukΞ Mulks 🦁⟁◎⟁ is Vice President of Business Operations at Brave, the company behind the privacy-first Brave browser with more than 121 million monthly active users. After leaving the ad tech industry in 2016, he joined Brave to help build a better internet and later co-authored the Basic Attention Token (BAT) (BAT) white paper. In this episode, we break down Brave's newly released Roadmap 4.0, including: • How Brave plans to rebuild the economic layer of the web • Why the traditional advertising model is breaking down in the age of AI • Brave's vision for stablecoins, BAT buybacks, and a new "web of value" • X402, Machine Payments, and why AI agents need native internet payments • Why Brave Search API has seen explosive growth as developers build the next generation of AI applications • The Creator Contribution Protocol and Brave's vision for paying creators in the AI era • The new unified Brave Wallet, Brave Pay, and bringing self-custody to everyday payments • Why private digital cash is essential for preserving freedom in a cashless world • How mass surveillance creates permanent profiles that can be abused by governments, criminals, or foreign adversaries Remember to subscribe and hit the bell "🔔" icon to get notifications. Check out my favorite privacy coin, Zano and follow Zano for updates. You can buy Zano seamlessly on MEXC using a VPN, or browse the full list of exchanges where Zano is available here: You can also find educational content, tutorials, and interviews on the official Zano YouTube Channel: 0:00 Luke Mulks on Why He Left Ad Tech to Help Build Brave 2:27 Why 121 Million People Are Choosing Brave 3:45 Brave Roadmap 4.0: Rebuilding the Economic Layer of the Web 5:25 Why Programmatic Advertising Is Dying & What Replaces It 8:23 BAT, Stablecoins & the "Web of Value": How Users Could Earn From Everyday Activity 10:42 Cash Is Disappearing. What Replaces Financial Freedom? 11:41 Why Private Digital Cash Is Essential for a Free Society: ZANO 13:29 X402 & Machine Payments 15:05 The Convergence of AI, Crypto & Autonomous Payments 16:41 Why Stablecoins Could Become the Internet's Default Payment Rail 18:22 Will Brave Launch Its Own Stablecoin? How BAT Buybacks Could Work? 22:12 Brave's Creator Contribution Protocol: Paying Creators in the AI Era 25:29 Can AI Protect Creators? The Future of Copyright, Attribution & Royalties 28:12 Inside the New Unified Brave Wallet: Self-Custody Meets Everyday Payments 31:23 How Crypto Cards Actually Work at Checkout 35:59 What Does Privacy-Preserving Commerce Actually Mean? 38:03 The Phia Browser Extension Controversy & the Growing Browser Trust Problem 39:47 Could X and Brave Work Together? 43:01 Waymo Locked Kids Inside a Driverless Car 44:51 Flock: How Third Parties Built Your Digital Profile

Bri Teresi

254,612 просмотров • 12 дней назад

What Did Otto Warmbier Say in North Korean Court, in the Presence of International Journalists and Observers? (FULL VIDEO in English) Here is his statement, his confession, and the details of the crime he premeditated: - Otto Warmbier: "First, I would like to thank you all for attending this press conference of the trial, which I requested to take place. I also want to express my sincere gratitude for this opportunity to apologize for my crime, beg for forgiveness, and plead for any assistance to save my life. On December 29, 2015, I entered the DPRK as a tourist. On January 1, I committed severe crimes against the people and government of the DPRK. Due to this crime, on January 2, I was detained and placed under investigation. My name is Otto Frederick Warmbier, I am 22 years old, a finance student at the University of Virginia, currently in my third year. My home address is ******, where I live with my family. At present, I reside in a rented apartment near my university. My father owns a small factory that barely covers our family’s expenses, my mother is a homemaker, and my younger brother and sister are both high school students. On January 2, I committed the crime of trespassing into a private and restricted area of a building and stealing a political slogan. This task was given to me by the First United Methodist Church in Charlottesville, Virginia. Growing up in the United States, I was taught by the mass media and in school that the DPRK is a mysterious and isolated communist country. This led to my youthful ignorance, as I wanted to show bravery and build my reputation by demonstrating Western victory over the DPRK. My friends had told me that the DPRK was a beautiful country with stunning architecture. They suggested that if I were interested, I should consider visiting. Based on this recommendation, I started planning my trip. In January 2016, I was scheduled to begin a university-funded course in Hong Kong, and I took this opportunity to visit the DPRK as a tourist before starting my finance course. I asked my father and brother to travel with me, contacted various tour agencies via email, and chose the cheapest one. I gave my father $800, and he agreed to pay the remaining $400 to cover the $1,200 trip at the end of December. Back in September, I had dinner at my friend Stephen Webb’s house with his mother, Sharon Webb, who is a deaconess at the Friendship United Methodist Church. She mentioned that communist nations value propaganda slogans and suggested that I take one from the country to display in her church as a trophy. She then continued, knowing that I was desperate to get a car for transportation between home and university every day. She offered me a used car and $10,000 if I succeeded. She also said that if I were detained and unable to return, her church would pay my mother $200,000 as a generous contribution, which I intended to use for my siblings’ college tuition—though this would still be $200,000 short of the total $400,000 needed. Then, she showed me the church’s bank account with $40 million. At first, I hesitated out of fear, but as my family was struggling with severe financial difficulties, I began to see this as a golden opportunity to earn money. The most important thing she told me was that I must never expose the Friendship United Methodist Church, or no payment would be made. In early October, I briefly informed my mother about the proposal, telling her that I planned to steal something valuable from the country and that if I were caught, she would receive bank transfers to cover my siblings' education. She cried and begged me not to do anything dangerous. But from then on, I was pressured multiple times by the church, and I ultimately decided to proceed with this premeditated crime. Meanwhile, the ‘Z Society’ also encouraged this act. When I learned that its members earn high salaries after graduation, I was eager to join them. In late November, I told a fellow university student and Z Society member about my plan in the DPRK. He informed me that this act would benefit the society’s goal of promoting "freedom" and ending "tyranny." He assured me that if I succeeded, he would help me join the society. However, if I were caught, they would pressure the North Korean government through their partners. Finally, he told me that I must never expose the Z Society's encouragement. After meticulously planning my actions, I arrived in Pyongyang on December 29 from Beijing, and on January 1, I committed the crime of stealing a North Korean slogan." - North Korean Court Official: "Warmbier’s statement has concluded. As you have heard, the U.S. administration is committing malicious acts against our country. If you have any questions, please proceed." - KCNA Journalist: "I am from the Korean Central News Agency. What motivation do you believe the Friendship United Methodist Church had in assigning you this task?" - Otto Warmbier: “I will now explain the motivation of the Friendship United Methodist Church in giving me this mission. The Friendship United Methodist Church is located in Cincinnati, Ohio, in the United States. I have known this church since my childhood because I grew up there. You can find more information about this church on the internet. It is not a typical church; it is very wealthy, and the U.S. government has strong ties with it, promoting this type of activity in countries they claim to be anti-Christian. Several Democratic politicians from the U.S. frequently visit this church to collect funds and support it in other spheres. This church even donated more than 10 million dollars to Barack Obama’s campaign in 2008, which accounted for about 3% of the former president's campaign funds collected at this church. For this reason, the U.S. government is so close to this church and promotes the kind of activity I am now involved in. U.S. politicians use churches like this to harm the DPRK. If this mission had been successful, the church would have received more support from the U.S. government. Because of this hostile policy of the government against the country, I was a manipulated victim who fell into this scheme to help my family, which is struggling with financial problems. However, since I am not a religious person, the church knew that if this came to light, they could easily deny any connection with me. I hope this clarifies the church’s involvement in my crime. Thank you for your attention.” - Journalist from Rodong Sinmun: “You said that Society Z encouraged you in this mission. Tell me everything you know about them.” - Otto Warmbier: “Thank you very much for your question. Society Z is a secret organization that operates at the University of Virginia. All its members remain anonymous. I first learned about it when I entered the university and saw many of its symbols around campus. I was told that this secret organization donates millions of dollars to the university, which is why its symbols are displayed everywhere. I know that there are at least 10 student members of 'Society Z' at the university. It is said that after graduation, all of them will become very wealthy and take on major roles in politics, business, and religion. Some well-known members of 'Society Z' include former U.S. President Woodrow Wilson and a former CIA director. To become a member, one must be wealthy, a leader, and have top academic scores, as well as demonstrate significant acts of bravery and sacrifice against tyranny. Because of this encouragement, I committed this crime, and without a doubt, the CIA is aware of this influence. Finally, I would like to declare that I am a political victim of the United States' hostile policy against the DPRK. I naively attempted to obtain money through this criminal act. I am just a pawn in a system that does not distinguish between friend and enemy—only money. I hope others do not follow the same path as I did.” - Journalist from Joson Sinbo: “I am from Joson Sinbo, under the General Association of Korean Residents in Japan. You said that you carefully planned these steps from the U.S. before committing this crime in the DPRK. Can you tell me more about this?” - Otto Warmbier: “Thank you for your question. Now, I will explain how I prepared to commit this crime directly from the U.S. To learn more about the country’s slogans, I searched the internet using the keywords ‘North Korean slogan’ directly from my apartment in Virginia. I looked at about 30 images, some of them large and framed. I then thought that I could remove one of them easily, as they were large, red, and rectangular. To practice before arriving in the country, I went out onto the street and stole traffic signs, hiding them under my bed. Then, I spoke with my friend and planned possible excuses in case I was caught by the North Korean authorities. I decided that I would say I was drunk and did not remember doing it. If I was caught with the slogan, I planned to claim that I had bought it in a souvenir shop in the country. For this reason, when I was caught, my first statement was that I was drunk and did not remember. Additionally, while still preparing in the U.S., I picked out my best boots and got a large suitcase to fit the North Korean slogan inside. Thank you for listening.” - Journalist Yuri Sidorov from the Russian news agency TASS: “Tell me more about the crimes you committed in Korea.” - Otto Warmbier: “Thank you for your question. Now, I will explain the details of the crime I committed... On December 30, while still in Beijing, I asked my British tour guide where the political slogans were kept in the building where we were going to stay. She said they were probably in the restricted area of the building. When I arrived, I noticed a sign on a door on the second floor stating in English that it was a restricted area. I looked for cameras but did not find any. I chose to commit my crime at dawn on New Year’s Day, thinking there would be fewer staff working due to the holiday and the late hour. I knew my tour guide would be drunk, so I planned to use the same excuse. I then entered the restricted area of the building and searched for a slogan. When I found one, I removed it from the frame with my hands. It was much larger and heavier than I had expected. At that moment, I became very scared, realizing I would not be able to steal the slogan. However, I managed to turn it over and then ran out of the restricted area.” - Journalist from the Chinese news agency Xinhua: “You said that you are under investigation and have committed serious crimes. Did you undergo any form of torture or psychological pressure from the judicial authorities of the DPRK?” - Otto Warmbier: “Thank you for your question. I will now explain the treatment I received in the country. As an American, arrested for serious crimes, I feared I would face torture and psychological pressure, but that was completely wrong in my mind. I have received the most humanitarian treatment possible. I am being held in a place that feels like a guesthouse. I haven’t received any torture or psychological pressure. I am provided with three high-quality meals a day, I have had full medical exams, and I am allowed to walk outside for one hour every day. I even got a haircut. I sleep more than eight hours a day, and as you can see, I am healthy, but I miss my family a lot. I was very impressed with the humanitarian treatment by the government of the country and with its legal process. This is the most embarrassing moment of my life for committing a crime like this in such a friendly country. I hope that with this press conference, my family can see that I am okay and feel relieved. However, I miss them dearly. I understand the seriousness of my crimes and have no idea what punishment I may face, but I implore the Korean people and the government for forgiveness. I just want to go home.” - North Korean Court Official: “Any more questions? ... Mr. Warmbier, would you like to say anything else?” - Otto Warmbier: “I want to thank the North Korean government for giving me the opportunity to ask the people for forgiveness for the crime I committed. However, the main ones responsible for this are the Friendship United Methodist Church, Society Z, and the U.S. administration, which used me, as they have used many others before me. I am a victim of the hostile U.S. policy towards the DPRK. I wish all the young people in the United States who are watching this never to allow themselves to be used by the U.S. administration. What I saw during my trip was very different from what is portrayed in the West, where the country is shown as evil. I realized that the human rights issue of the DPRK, as presented by the U.S. government, is just an excuse to attack and harm the lives of the Korean people with the intent of overthrowing their government. I ask for forgiveness from the Korean people and beg you to see how I was used and manipulated. Please, save my life, I am the oldest son in my family. My family needs me, I made the worst decision of my life, but I am human, and I hope you will forgive me. I also want to ask the journalists to report this story correctly and help me in any way they can. I fear my family may be threatened by the U.S. government, and I beg for any kind of protection for them. Finally, I plead with the North Korean people to forgive me; I should never have been used by the U.S. government.” — END

Korean Friendship League 🇰🇵

38,071 просмотров • 1 год назад

💛 ทุกวินาทีในวิดีโอนี้…คือความตั้งใจที่เราอยากมอบให้ทุกคนได้สัมผัส JANUA LIMITED BOX SET ตัวเต็ม พร้อมแล้วสำหรับทุกคนที่รอคอย 💛 เตรียมตัวให้พร้อม! พบกับการเปิดขายในวันที่ 3 พฤศจิกายน 2568 เพราะ “เซอร์ไพรส์ในกล่อง” คุ้มค่าแก่การรอคอยมากจริง ๆ ✨ ⸻ หมายเหตุ : 1.รายละเอียดสินค้าภายในกล่อง Mine Wish Limited Edition 50ml – 1 ชิ้น มูลค่า 490.- Mine Wish Festive Design 30ml – 1 ชิ้น มูลค่า 290.- Mine Wish Festive Design 30ml – 1 ชิ้น มูลค่า 290.- Dreamy Cloud Festive Design 30ml – 1 ชิ้น มูลค่า 290.- Kiss Me More Festive Design 30ml – 1 ชิ้น มูลค่า 290.- Passion Love Festive Design 30ml – 1 ชิ้น มูลค่า 290.- Juicy Mallow New Collection 15ml – 1 ชิ้น มูลค่า 219.- Cotton Cloud New Collection 15ml – 1 ชิ้น มูลค่า 219.- Sugar Bunny New Collection 15ml – 1 ชิ้น มูลค่า 219.- Memory of Sunrise The Exclusive Comeback 30ml – 1 ชิ้น มูลค่า 239.- 2. Unreleased Postcard จำนวน 2 รูป โดยมีรายละเอียดดังนี้ Unreleased Fix Card 1 Unreleased Random Card 1 (สุ่มจากจำนวนทั้งหมด 2 รูป) ระยะเวลาร่วมกิจกรรม: 3 – 10 พฤศจิกายน 2568 ประกาศผลผู้โชคดี: 15 พฤศจิกายน 2568 เริ่มจัดส่งสินค้า ตั้งแต่วันที่ 30 พฤศจิกายน 2568 เป็นต้นไป ⸻ กติกาการร่วมกิจกรรม “WE MAKE THE PHENOMENON – JANUA X RENJUN” CAMPAIGN 2 : JANUA LIMITED BOX SET 📌 รายละเอียดและกติกาแคมเปญ 1. การได้รับสิทธิ์ลุ้นที่นั่ง ทุกการซื้อ JANUA LIMITED BOX SET ราคา 1,990 บาท / 1 กล่อง = 5 สิทธิ์ (ปรับเพิ่มจากเดิม 1 กล่อง = 1 สิทธิ์) สินค้ามีจำนวนจำกัดเท่านั้น ราคานี้ยังไม่รวมค่าจัดส่ง การลุ้นสิทธิ์ขึ้นอยู่กับจำนวนสิทธิ์ที่ได้รับ ไม่ได้พิจารณาจากยอดซื้อมากที่สุด ไม่จำกัดจำนวนการสั่งซื้อต่อคน และไม่สามารถยกเลิกคำสั่งซื้อได้ทุกกรณี ⸻ 2. ระยะเวลาแคมเปญ สามารถสั่งซื้อสินค้าได้ตั้งแต่ วันที่ 3 พฤศจิกายน 2568 – วันที่ 10 พฤศจิกายน 2568 เวลา 23:59 น. คำสั่งซื้อที่อยู่ภายในช่วงเวลาดังกล่าวเท่านั้นที่จะได้รับสิทธิ์ลุ้น เพื่อลุ้นสิทธิ์ที่นั่งโซนหมายเลข 001–250 หมายเหตุเพิ่มเติม: สินค้าจะถูกวางจำหน่ายจนกว่าสินค้าจะหมด แต่สิทธิ์ในการ “ลุ้นที่นั่งเข้าร่วมอีเวนต์” จะนับเฉพาะคำสั่งซื้อที่เกิดขึ้นในช่วงวันที่ 3 – 10 พฤศจิกายน 2568 เวลา 23:59 น. เท่านั้น ⸻ 3. ช่องทางการสั่งซื้อ สั่งซื้อได้ผ่าน 2 ช่องทางเท่านั้น 1. LINE MY SHOP : 2. DM Instagram : janua_thailand (สงวนสิทธิ์สำหรับต่างชาติเท่านั้น) 👉 วิธีชำระเงินที่เข้าร่วมรายการสำหรับ Line My Shop ช่องทางการชำระเงิน 1. PromptPay QR: ลูกค้าสามารถสแกน QR Code เพื่อชำระเงินได้ 2. Mobile Banking: รองรับการชำระผ่านแอปพลิเคชันธนาคาร เช่น K PLUS และ SCB Easy 3. LINE Pay : 3.1 e-Wallet: ชำระเงินผ่านกระเป๋าเงินอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ของ LINE 3.2 บัตรเครดิต/เดบิต: สามารถผูกบัตร Visa, Mastercard, JCB และบัตรเครือข่ายไทยที่รองรับ 👉 วิธีชำระเงินที่เข้าร่วมรายการสำหรับ DM Instagram : janua_thailand • ชำระตรงผ่านเลขที่บัญชีบริษัทเท่านั้น 👉 สถานะคำสั่งซื้อ • จะพิจารณาเฉพาะคำสั่งซื้อที่มี หมายเลขคำสั่งซื้อ ขึ้นโชว์เท่านั้น ⸻ 4. ชื่อผู้รับสินค้า ชื่อ–นามสกุลผู้รับสินค้าต้องตรงกับชื่อจริงในบัตรประชาชนหรือพาสปอร์ต เพื่อใช้ยืนยันสิทธิ์เข้าร่วมกิจกรรม ที่อยู่ในการจัดส่งสินค้าไม่จำเป็นต้องตรงกับบัตรประชาชนหรือพาสปอร์ต ⸻ 5. ระยะเวลาและการจัดส่งสินค้า การจัดส่ง JANUA LIMITED BOX SET จะเริ่มตั้งแต่วันที่ 30 พฤศจิกายน 2568 เป็นต้นไป โดยจะจัดส่งตามลำดับคิวของคำสั่งซื้อที่เข้ามาก่อน–หลัง เพื่อให้ทุกกล่องถูกจัดส่งอย่างครบถ้วนและปลอดภัยที่สุด ⸻ 6. ระบบบันทึกสิทธิ์และการตรวจสอบ สิทธิ์ของผู้สั่งซื้อจะถูกบันทึกโดยอัตโนมัติ ไม่ต้องลงทะเบียนเพิ่มเติม สามารถตรวจสอบจำนวนสิทธิ์ได้หลังคำสั่งซื้อสำเร็จภายใน 2 วัน ผ่านทางเว็บไซต์ 👉 วิธีตรวจสอบสิทธิ์: 1. เข้าเว็บไซต์ 2. กรอกเบอร์โทรศัพท์ที่ใช้ในการสั่งซื้อสินค้า (ต้องเป็นเบอร์เดียวกับในที่อยู่จัดส่ง Box Set) 3. ระบบจะแสดงข้อมูล ชื่อ, ที่อยู่, และจำนวนสิทธิ์ที่ได้รับทันที ⸻ 7. วันที่ประกาศผลผู้โชคดี วันที่ 15 พฤศจิกายน 2568 ผู้โชคดีจาก Campaign 2 จะได้รับสิทธิ์ที่นั่งในโซนหมายเลข 001–250 โดยจะประกาศผ่านทาง เว็บไซต์ X : 𝐉𝐀𝐍𝐔𝐀 Instagram : janua_thailand ⸻ 8. การยืนยันสิทธิ์ ผู้ได้รับสิทธิ์ต้องยืนยันสิทธิ์ของตน ผ่านทาง LINE Official: Janua ภายในวันที่ 15 พฤศจิกายน – 21 พฤศจิกายน 2568 หากไม่ยืนยันสิทธิ์ภายในเวลาที่กำหนด จะถือว่าสละสิทธิ์โดยอัตโนมัติ และทางแบรนด์จะประกาศรายชื่อผู้โชคดีสำรองขึ้นมาแทนในวันที่ 22 พฤศจิกายน 2568 ⸻ 9. หลักฐานที่ต้องใช้ในวันรายงานตัว ผู้ได้รับสิทธิ์เข้าร่วมอีเวนต์ ต้องนำเอกสารต่อไปนี้มาแสดงเพื่อยืนยันตัวตน : 1. ใบเสร็จการสั่งซื้อสินค้า (ฉบับพิมพ์จากระบบออนไลน์) 2. บัตรประชาชน หรือพาสปอร์ตตัวจริง ที่ตรงกับข้อมูลการลงทะเบียน ⸻ 10. จำนวนสิทธิ์ต่อผู้เข้าร่วม 1. จำกัดสิทธิ์ผู้โชคดี 1 คนต่อ 1 หมายเลขบัตรประชาชนหรือพาสปอร์ตเท่านั้น ไม่สามารถโอนสิทธิ์ให้ผู้อื่น หรือใช้หมายเลขเดียวกันลงทะเบียนซ้ำเพื่อรับสิทธิ์มากกว่า 1 ที่นั่งได้ 2. หากผู้ได้รับสิทธิ์ได้ที่นั่งทั้งใน Campaign 1 และ Campaign 2 จำเป็นต้องสละสิทธิ์ใดสิทธิ์หนึ่ง โดยแจ้งความประสงค์มาที่ LINE Official: Janua ก่อนวันที่ 21 พฤศจิกายน 2568 และทางแบรนด์จะประกาศผู้โชคดีสำรองขึ้นมาแทนในวันที่ 22 พฤศจิกายน 2568 ⸻ 11. เงื่อนไขการยกเลิกและคืนเงิน • ไม่สามารถยกเลิกคำสั่งซื้อหรือขอคืนเงินได้ในทุกกรณี ยกเว้นกรณีที่สินค้าเกิดความเสียหายจากการขนส่ง ซึ่งหากสินค้าเกิดความเสียหายจากขนส่ง ทางแบรนด์จะจัดส่งสินค้าชิ้นใหม่ให้ โดยไม่ให้ยกเลิกคำสั่งซื้อในทุกกรณี • การพิจารณาการคืนสินค้าจะเป็นไปตามเงื่อนไขของแบรนด์เท่านั้น ⸻ 12. การคุ้มครองข้อมูลส่วนบุคคล (PDPA) ข้อมูลส่วนบุคคลของผู้เข้าร่วมกิจกรรม เช่น ชื่อ–นามสกุล หมายเลขโทรศัพท์ และบัตรประชาชนหรือพาสปอร์ต จะถูกเก็บรักษาอย่างปลอดภัย และใช้เพื่อการยืนยันสิทธิ์เท่านั้น โดยจะไม่ถูกเปิดเผยหรือใช้ในวัตถุประสงค์อื่น ⸻ 13. ข้อสงวนสิทธิ์ของแบรนด์ แบรนด์ JANUA ขอสงวนสิทธิ์ในการเปลี่ยนแปลงเงื่อนไข รายละเอียดกิจกรรม หรือกำหนดการต่าง ๆ โดยไม่ต้องแจ้งให้ทราบล่วงหน้า หากเกิดเหตุสุดวิสัยหรือเหตุจำเป็นทางเทคนิค ช่องทางติดต่อสอบถามเพิ่มเติม หากมีข้อสงสัยเกี่ยวกับการสั่งซื้อหรือการร่วมกิจกรรม สามารถติดต่อได้ที่ 📩 LINE Official: Janua 🌐 เว็บไซต์: --------------------------- 💛 Every second in this video represents our passion that we wish everyone could feel. JANUA LIMITED BOX SET (Full Version) is now finally ready for everyone who has been waiting 💛 Get yourself ready! The official sale begins on November 3, 2025. Because the “surprise inside the box” is truly worth the wait. ✨ ⸻ Remarks : 1.Product Details Inside the Box • Mine Wish Limited Edition 50ml – 1 pc (Value: 490 THB) • Mine Wish Festive Design 30ml – 1 pc (Value: 290 THB) • Mine Wish Festive Design 30ml – 1 pc (Value: 290 THB) • Dreamy Cloud Festive Design 30ml – 1 pc (Value: 290 THB) • Kiss Me More Festive Design 30ml – 1 pc (Value: 290 THB) • Passion Love Festive Design 30ml – 1 pc (Value: 290 THB) • Juicy Mallow New Collection 15ml – 1 pc (Value: 219 THB) • Cotton Cloud New Collection 15ml – 1 pc (Value: 219 THB) • Sugar Bunny New Collection 15ml – 1 pc (Value: 219 THB) • Memory of Sunrise The Exclusive Comeback 30ml – 1 pc (Value: 239 THB) 2.Unreleased Postcards (2 pieces) as follows: • Unreleased Fixed Card (1 piece) • Unreleased Random Card (1 piece, randomly selected from a total of 2 designs) ⸻ Campaign Duration : November 3 – 10, 2025 Winner Announcement : November 15, 2025 Shipping Start Date : From November 30, 2025 onward ⸻ Campaign Rules and Conditions “WE MAKE THE PHENOMENON – JANUA X RENJUN” CAMPAIGN 2 : JANUA LIMITED BOX SET ⸻ 📌 Campaign Details and Rules 1. Lucky Draw Eligibility Every purchase of JANUA LIMITED BOX SET (1,990 THB per box) = 5 Lucky Draw Entries (Increased from the previous condition of 1 box = 1 entry) The amount of product is limited quantities. This price does not include shipping fees. The number of entries will determine your lucky draw chances. It is not based on the highest total purchase amount. There is no purchase limit per person, and order cancellations are not allowed under any circumstances. ⸻ 2. Campaign Period Customers can place their orders from November 3, 2025 – November 10, 2025 (until 23:59). Only orders placed within this period will be eligible for the lucky draw for seat numbers 001–250. Additional Note: Products will remain available until sold out. However, eligibility for the “Lucky Draw to join the event” will apply only to orders placed between November 3 – 10, 2025 (until 23:59). ⸻ 3. Sales Channels Available through 2 official channels only: 1. LINE MY SHOP: 2. Instagram DM: janua_thailand (for international customers only) 👉 Payment Methods for LINE MY SHOP: 1. PromptPay QR: Customers can scan the QR code to make payment. 2. Mobile Banking: Supported through major Thai bank applications such as K PLUS and SCB Easy. 3. LINE Pay 3.1 e-Wallet: Payment via LINE electronic wallet. 3.2 Credit/Debit Card: Supports Visa, Mastercard, JCB, and Thai-issued cards. 👉 Payment Method for Instagram DM (Janua_thailand): • Direct bank transfer to the official company account only. 👉 Order Status: Only orders that display an “order number” will be eligible for participation. ⸻ 4. Recipient Name The recipient’s full name must match the official name on their National ID or Passport for event verification purposes. The shipping address does not need to match the identification document. ⸻ 5. Shipping Schedule Shipment of JANUA LIMITED BOX SET will begin from November 30, 2025 onward, following the order queue chronologically (first come, first served) to ensure that every box is carefully and completely delivered. ⸻ 6. Entry Recording and Verification All purchase entries will be automatically recorded — no additional registration is required. Customers can verify their total entries within 2 days after completing their order via the website 👉 How to check your entries: 1. Visit 2. Enter the phone number used in your order (must be the same as the shipping address). 3. The system will display your name, address, and total number of entries. ⸻ 7. Winner Announcement November 15, 2025 Winners from Campaign 2 will receive seats in Zone Numbers 001–250. The announcement will be made through the following official channels: • Website: • X (Twitter): 𝐉𝐀𝐍𝐔𝐀 • Instagram: janua_thailand ⸻ 8. Confirmation of Rights Winners must confirm their participation via LINE Official: Janua between November 15 – 21, 2025. If the confirmation is not submitted within the specified period, the right to participate will be automatically forfeited. Replacement winners will be announced on November 22, 2025. ⸻ 9. Required Documents on the Event Day Winners must present the following documents for identity verification: • Printed purchase receipt (official online version) • Original National ID card or Passport that matches the registration details ⸻ 10. Number of Seats per Participant 1. Each winner is entitled to only 1 seat per National ID or Passport. Rights cannot be transferred or duplicated for multiple entries using the same ID. 2. If a winner receives seats in both Campaign 1 and Campaign 2, they must choose one campaign to attend and notify LINE Official: Janua before November 21, 2025. Replacement winners will be announced on November 22, 2025. ⸻ 11. Cancellation and Refund Policy • Orders cannot be cancelled or refunded under any circumstances, except in the case of product damage during shipment. If damage occurs during delivery, the brand will resend a new product, but order cancellations will still not be accepted in any case. • All product return evaluations will strictly follow the brand’s policy. ⸻ 12. Personal Data Protection (PDPA) Personal information of participants, including full name, phone number, and national ID or passport number, will be securely stored and used solely for verification purposes. No personal data will be disclosed or used for any other purpose. ⸻ 13. Brand Reservation of Rights JANUA reserves the right to amend campaign conditions, details, or schedules without prior notice in the event of unavoidable circumstances or technical issues. ⸻ For Inquiries or Further Information If you have any questions regarding your order or participation, please contact: 📩 LINE Official: Janua 🌐 Website: #JANUAXRENJUN

𝐉𝐀𝐍𝐔𝐀

379,455 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

My official resignation from playstation video Due to corruption and oppression with evidence. The translation isnt very accurate and goes fast sometimes so i will write the story here. I know its a long video but its a must watch -------- Keep in mind this isnt about you support or hate me.. its about sensitive data leakage and company corruption so everyone is in it! -------- I was going to release this video few months back but i held back due to the problem being solved and i kept quiet. Here is my story before i start i want to introduce my self to the people who dont know me. My name is AbdulHakam AKA Hakoom i love playing video games since the 80s and got hooked up with the playstation brand back in 1996.. in 2007 the online system came on the ps3 and i created my playstation acc back then, later on playstation released the trophy system and i was able to achieve the 1st rank in 2009 and in 2018/2019 i entered Guinness 5 times.. later at 2021 i retired unofficially due to the garbage 1$ shovelware getting out of hand on psn. I then had a partnership with playstation and i started receiving review codes and hardware for reviewing All was good until sept 9. on sept 9 my acc was permanently suspended for no reason and i received no email at all.. even when i talked to customer support they didnt help at all i was then lucky to get in touch with another department and they said they will look in to the matter few days later i received a msg on whatsapp from a random person saying my datas are leaked on the internet and the user is bribing playstation employees and stealing user datas and selling/banning them ( all photos and evidence are in the video) The photos clearly show playstation admin computers which no user can access on a normal computer this information was all forwarded to playstation for investigation.. the scammer even called me and tried to get private datas from me which is showin in the video too and that was also forwarded to playstation. After all that mountain of evidence playstation replies and i was shocked!!! They said you have violations 1- you platinumed games which require 100h to platinum in few hours 2- You completed games in 0 mins 3- you logged in over 2000 accs on your playstations 4- you logged in 29 playstations I was like wth? what is the game which i platinum in few hours and req 100? psnprofiles would insta flag me for that... then i remembered something called auto trophy pops or platinum pops which all of you trophy hunter know.. If you platinum Spiderman for example on ps4 in 50h then boot up the ps5 version you earn it in 1min that's something normal and the system is implemented by playstation them selves.. ( google auto trophy pop) so auto pop is a ban able offense now? and regarding the 0 min games there are loads of games on PlayStation which can be completed/platinumed in 10 seconds 20 seconds 30 seconds etc... every trophy hunter knows this Why those employees dont understand there own system? do i need to teach them all this? and regarding the 2000 accs I have been playing since 2007 thats 17 years you think as a trophy hunter i will not have alot of accs for dead online games? and i have alot of users lending me games which playstation themselves said game sharing is fine. regarding the 29 consoles again.. 17 years i had over 10 ps3s 5 or 6 ps4s 4 ps vitas 2 ps5s 2 pstvs So your acc is bound to 1 console and you can put it on another? what i see from this is playstation is running away from the real issue which is user data leakage and just threw me under the bus so they put this issue under the rug and get it over with.. companies will always blame the user for there mistakes If your acc gets banned or email changed for no reason that is 100% stolen with this method and your datas are on the blackmarket there is no other explanation and its over for you. so as you see guys how can i trust a company who sells user datas to some scammers on the internet and get away with it. Even after the mountain of evidence i showed they still wouldnt accept it and just told me we will raise the ban after 45 days.. they also removed me from the partnership program.. My acc is back yes but i cant live with this opression and corruption ! so i had to share the story with everyone The videos shows evidence of user data leakage from telegram groups including a staff from granturismo company polyphony and the num2 trophy hunter on psn I have more images but i just posted a few in the video It clearly shows playstation admin computers.. and not a normal user computer what do you think? keeping the love and hate about hakoom aside.. your datas are being sold on the blackmarket and this is corruption as i see it I hope the CEO of playstation looks in to this and solves this matter ASAP . any media who wants more details or a story re this matter please contact me on my email [email protected] #playstation #hakoom

Hakoom

4,736,194 просмотров • 1 год назад

«Кто-то украл мои традиционные ценности» ВЧК-ОГПУ и удалось выяснить новые подробности нападения 16-летнего школьника Артема на чиновника Роскомнадзора Алексея Белякова. 19 января в районе 18.00 из главного здания РКН выходили два человека. К ним приблизился совершенно обычный подросток, который не выглядел угрожающе. Очевидцы описали, что нападавший был в широких брюках, худощавого телосложения и с длинными волосами «в разные стороны». Он не издавал криков и не вступал в диалог. Удар ножом был один и прямо в сердце. Беляев выходил не один, а с еще одним сотрудником Роскомнадзора. Похоже, что Артем в качестве жертвы выбрал человека, который внешним видом наиболее олицетворял чиновника: Беляев был в классическом пальто и при галстуке. Артема задержали по «горячим следам», суд отправил его под стражу. На отдельных видео на форумах Артем выглядел обычным подростком: толстовка с эмблемой в стилистике Y2k, широкие штаны, вязанная шапка, большая копна волос. Он вел маленький ютуб-канал с обзорами. Была страничка в Инстаграм с абсолютно детским контентом. Был еще чат в Телеграм, права на которой он передал приятелю накануне нападения. За пять месяцев до случившегося Артем оставил в соцсетях такое сообщение: «Сегодня, проснувшись утром, я заметил, что кто-то нагло и беспринципно украл мои традиционные ценности, пожалуйста, если кто-то видел их или находил, сообщите мне». Алексей Беляков на момент гибели был в должности заместителя начальника отдела контроля и надзора в сфере связи. Это один из ключевых отделов ведомства, которое занимается блокировками и замедлением трафика. "Someone Stole My Traditional Values" The Cheka-OGPU and have uncovered new details of the attack by 16-year-old schoolboy Artem on Roskomnadzor official Alexey Belyakov. On January 19, around 6:00 PM, two men were leaving the main building of Roskomnadzor. They were approached by a seemingly ordinary teenager who didn't appear threatening. Eyewitnesses described the attacker as wearing baggy pants, a slim build, and with long hair "straight." He didn't scream or engage in conversation. The knife was stabbed once, directly to the heart. Belyaev wasn't leaving alone, but with another Roskomnadzor employee. It appears Artem chose the person whose appearance most closely resembled that of an official: Belyaev was wearing a formal coat and tie. Artem was detained immediately, and the court remanded him in custody. In some forum videos, Artem looked like an ordinary teenager: a sweatshirt with a Y2K-style logo, baggy pants, a knit hat, and a large mop of hair. He ran a small YouTube channel with reviews. He also had an Instagram page with purely childish content. He also had a Telegram chat, the rights to which he transferred to a friend the day before the attack. Five months before the attack, Artem posted the following message on social media: "This morning, when I woke up, I noticed that someone brazenly and unscrupulously stole my traditional values. If anyone has seen them or found them, please let me know." At the time of his death, Alexey Belyakov was the deputy head of the Department of Control and Supervision in the Communications Sector. This is one of the agency's key departments, responsible for blocking and slowing down traffic.

ВЧК ОГПУ (Истина любит действовать открыто).

27,803 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Well, friends, the interview the John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial world didn't know they wanted has finally occurred. I appreciate The Glarer for having me on his program. We discussed Kate Peter, I defended Lindsey Gaetani's honor, both sides agreed as to the importance of civil debate and leaving people's families out of the fray and then Will helped Olivia and I move towards amicable discussion. Overall, a 10/10 way to celebrate the day towel become a YouTube partner. Here are my two favorite quotes from Will and myself; [Grant] "If any of you took 10 minutes --not on camera-- to talk to Lindsey Gaetani, you would find someone who believes in God, who cares about her children, who's a good mother, and who's not any of the things you made her out to be. And by God I will defend that 'till my last day." [Grant] "I realized that there was just this toxic atmosphere surrounding this case, and I couldn't just say I thought it needed to change — I had to reflect that change in my actions." [The Glarer] "If you believe so much in Karen Read’s guilt, then the facts should speak for themselves. You shouldn’t have to bring people’s family members into it. [The Glarer] "But you know what I think, Grant? I think that you're a really smart guy. And I think you know you're a really smart guy. And I think what you do is, you convince yourself — because of how smart you are — that if you came up with it, it must be gospel. And that's where I think you get cloudy between the truth and your opinion." Here's the full transcript: [Grant] Well, good afternoon towel friends. My name is Grant Smith Ellis and in addition to becoming a YouTube partner today I also decided to call into The Glarer's show. It was the collaboration that the world didn't know they needed but now they have. And if you'd like to listen to this fascinating conversation, related to new allegations as to Kate MafiaMasshole Peter being a PI in the orbit of the Aidan Turtleboy Kearney prosecution, as well as somehow both Will and I eventually coming to a discussion where I defended Lindsey Gaetani's honor, along with a closing segment about the importance on both sides of the Karen Read and John O’Keefe case of being mutually respectful, even if we have differences of opinion on those facts, you can do so right now. Will and I shared a belief that positive changes in the Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial world, at least in terms of that improving dynamic as to disagreeing without being disagreeable, are evident. So enjoy the conversation, folks. It was certainly an interesting one. [The Glarer] You're on — who am I speaking with? [Grant] Hey, Will, it's me. I'm Grant... [The Glarer] — hold on, I gotta give you applause, buddy. You made it. [Grant] Well, we certainly may have different views on the case, but I think we share respect for Jesus and we can talk bad about Kate Peter for sure. [The Glarer] Yeah, that we can do. Sure. Sure. So what's up, bud? What do you got to say? [Grant] Well, I think if people have been following me on X, they will know I've been yelling about Kate Peter taking an envelope of cash in the Chick-fil-A parking lot in front of me for months. And I feel vindicated as of the news of this weekend. [The Glarer] Okay. Okay, so wait a minute. That tracks. So the person who is in this sworn affidavit who claims to have seen Kate Peter with the manila envelope — you're claiming to have seen her with the same envelope. Is that what you're saying? [Grant] It wasn't a manila envelope. Well, there's two pertinent facts. So Kate Peter and I met up for the first time — I would say it was in the winter of 2024 — in a Chick-fil-A parking lot somewhere on the South Coast, maybe near Raynham or something. Anyway, she came and got in my car and she was like, "Well, I'm waiting for someone in a white Toyota Corolla to drop me off money. We try to do it with cash so it doesn't leave a record." And I was like, "Well, this seems a little weird." And then the car pulled up. I didn't actually see the car. She got out, went over to it, came back into my car. It was a white envelope with a green thank-you card. She opened it. There were probably four or five hundred — four or five fifties and a bunch of twenties. [The Glarer] Wow.... Okay, now Grant, I gotta ask you a tough question, buddy. I would be remiss if I didn't do that, all right? Now, a lot of people are thinking the same thing I'm thinking right now, which is: how can we believe you? Where's your credibility? Because you've lied about so many other things so easily. [Grant] Well, I would challenge that and say maybe you have different perspectives on me, but that should reinforce what I'm saying here. The Melanie Little and Alan Jackson Aruba thing — I apologized for that on stream and in a post (because Melanie Little told people not to go after Lindsey's kids, and I found that honorable). [The Glarer] Fair enough. [The Glarer] You did apologize. Okay, so you apologized for that. Okay. [Grant] But I'm critiquing someone [Kate Peter] who would ostensibly be aligned with what I believe about the case, and I still believe what I believe about Karen being responsible for John's death— we don't have to get into it — but I'm critiquing someone who supports that view. That should reinforce my credibility here. [The Glarer] Yeah, and MicroDots backs you up at least on this thing, you know, he says he believes you on this thing. I'm just saying — dude, I've read what you've written. You're a talented writer, clearly. But I can honestly say I've got a whole community of people here — a shit ton of people in this chat right now — that I know would agree with me that if you made a habit of reporting the truth, you'd have support, you'd have readers, you'd have a whole audience. I'd be a fan! But your credibility is fucked with me right now, dude. You know, and I hate that, because I actually enjoy reading what you write. [Grant] I appreciate what you're saying. I think I would just say maybe it's smaller than your community, but I just got made a YouTube partner today. I'm actually celebrating that. I have a small community, people do support me — maybe not as many as support your channel, but it's just people with different views consuming different content. [The Glarer] Yeah, but the thing is — like, I'm content with my audience. My audience could be bigger, but I cuss a lot and I use words that offend people and I just don't kind of play by the normal YouTube game that most creators play when they grow, you know? And I'm okay with the rate at which my channel grows because I get to be myself. But I don't hold back and I don't play by these rules. So I get all that. But I mean, I'm not ethically doing anything wrong. If I were spreading misinformation or contributing to any spread of misinformation, I would have a problem with myself and what I'm doing. You see what I'm saying? Like, it's a little bit different. You're telling me that you're content with your audience being small because you like to make shit up? You know what I mean? [Grant] No, no. Because it's a new channel. That's why the audience is growing. Anyway, the reason I shake your hand is I do think you're authentic in your beliefs, even if we disagree. And well — before I forget, one more thing about that Chick-fil-A parking lot cash that's actually important: when Kate got that money handed over, she told me it was for a donation drive to help other people offset babysitting costs or whatever nonsense. Someone sent a text message — a family member of the person who paid her that cash — and they put in writing that they sent the money for Kate's own expenses. So she lied to me in the car about what the money was for. Something’s up with that. [The Glarer] So she told you in the car that the money was for... [Grant] She said it was to pay for babysitters for people who need help and to donate to other people, which I don't believe. Like, of course not. Nobody believes that. [The Glarer] And then you found out — through what — that this money was actually for her personal expenses? [Grant] Eventually a text message got released from someone in the orbit of whoever paid Kate. It was a family member — I don't know who it was. I've only seen the text message. I'm happy to reshare it on my X later. In that text message, it says — quoting the person — "I sent that envelope with my sister over to Kate. It was for her expenses" or something like that. So even that is evidence. [The Glarer] Wow. Okay, so you are strictly of the opinion, based on things you've seen yourself, that Kate Peter is absolutely being paid by the Commonwealth to spin narratives? [Grant] I'll give you one more piece of information, Will, and maybe you or your audience can track this down: I don't think Kate was involved in the Karen Read investigation directly, but I think starting in the fall of 2023 she worked for a private investigator named Marty Kraft. And I believe by proxy she was then retained to work on Aidan's case through that PI firm. [The Glarer] Okay, and then she just became the mouthpiece between the PI firm and the Commonwealth is what you're saying. [Grant] I will say a few things: I reasonably believe she does have direct contact with the DA and agents of the Commonwealth — I've said that before — and I also believe that she has favoritism towards specific witnesses in the orbit of this case. Not all of them — specific witnesses. [The Glarer] Okay, well, I mean, we know who they are, but okay. [Grant] I will also say — I think — that your caller was prescient earlier, and they mentioned there might be some mutual blackmail. Well, we know that Lindsey Gaetani’s phone extraction was manipulated to remove messages from Brian Tully to Lindsey and from Kate Peter to Lindsey. [The Glarer] ...what's your deal with Lindsey? [Grant] Hold, on let's pull it back first. First of all, I think there was a bifurcation: there's charges from October 2023 against Aidan and December 2023 against Aidan. One set of charges, from October of 2023, involved the Karen Read witnesses; the other set, from December of 2023, involved Lindsey. I don't think anyone set Aidan up in December 2023. I think he was just in love with Lindsey and it kind of got out of control. [The Glarer] Bro... [Grant] Well, but hold on, Will... [The Glarer] I'm listening... [Grant] I think that cell phone extraction goes right to the mutual blackmail point your friend talked about earlier. Someone, during the course of the Aidan Kearney investigation involving Lindsey, manipulated that cell phone extraction, and it could have only happened while it was in State Police custody. That is the whole — that's everything right there because of Kate Peter is the only person who could have gotten Brian Tully to get Nick Guarino to manipulate that extraction while it was in State Police custody before Tully leaked it, by hand, to Aidan's lawyer. [The Glarer] Okay, so listen, Grant. Like, we know that Kate Peter and Lindsey were colluding. Now, I think Lindsey was used. But come on, we know that Kate Peter and Lindsey were colluding to try to set Aidan up. Like, you know this. [Grant] No, I disagree, because I've looked at the timeline closely. Aidan begged to go over there when his indictments got handed down in December. [The Glarer] Well, listen — why? [Grant] Because he got charged in October, but the indictments for the October thing came down December 20th. [Grant] Then when did he beg to go over to Lindsey's? [Grant] I'm about to explain. December 21st, Lindsey tells him, "Hey Aidan, I just got a subpoena for a grand jury." Aidan's mind has gotta' start racing. "Why would there be another grand jury? Is it about me and Karen Read? What is this about?" So he begged her to go over there so he could find out. And that's — like — he looked at her phone that night to see the messages between her and Kate to try to find out about what this new grand jury was about. So no one set him up. He begged to go over there. [The Glarer] So you're just assuming that he begged to go over there based on...? [Grant] I know he begged to go over there. He was pleading because he wanted to find out what the new grand jury was. [The Glarer] The difference between you and Aidan is Aidan posts receipts, dude. But you don't. You get the difference? That's why Aidan has as much of a following as he has. [Grant] If you're asking for receipts of him begging to go over there on that day, I'm happy to provide those. I'll post them. [The Glarer] Then why didn't you do that already? [Grant] Well, I think because what I understand to be the evidentiary record from going to all the hearings is different than what people consume, because not everyone goes to every hearing. But I'm happy to do that. I have it all archived. [The Glarer] Okay, but the point is — like MicroDots is saying — that he was baited to go over there. So even if he begged to go over there under whatever circumstance, we have proof — we've seen proof — that he was baited to go over there based on false information that she was pregnant. [Grant] No. No. She was pregnant. [The Glarer] Oh my, Grant, bro... [Grant] Okay. I will swear on my God about that. [The Glarer] Hold on... [Grant] Well, to move on, I was going to give you some credit. I was going to say you might have been right that the subpoena issued to Lindsey, without her knowledge, could have been to bait Aidan. [The Glarer] But she wouldn't — how do you explain the metadata on the pictures that she sent him of the sonogram, dude? [Grant] First of all, if you're talking about someone's pregnancy — that's a medical issue, and to bring it up on air disgraces Jesus. [The Glarer] Oh, come on, Grant. [Grant] Let's not. [The Glarer] Alright, fine. We won't talk about that anymore. But let's face it, dude — you're making excuses for this girl. And why? Like, do you have a crush on her? Is that what's going on here? And it's okay. [Grant] Oh, oh, please. When I first came into this case, I saw a woman walk into a courtroom, and I started listening to her story. And even in this conversation, there are multiple things I corrected where you were willing to say, "Okay, Grant, maybe that is what happened." And Lindsey doesn't have anyone out there who is voicing that for her, so I'm taking the opportunity to do it. [The Glarer] And do you wonder why she doesn't have anyone voicing things out for her, dude? [The Glarer] Because Aidan isolates people! [The Glarer] Get out of here with that. Stop. Again with the whole "it's Aidan's fault" shit, man. That's between you and Lindsey, dude. I'm asking — like, I asked you why you think that. Nobody is going to bat for Lindsey. And I saw receipts. I heard a recording of her — you're talking about somebody who I heard a recording of [that night with Aidan in December of 2023]. This is... Come on, Grant. [Grant] I was in the courtroom. I saw the people crying when that tape was played. And you know what I also heard, Will? I heard the original version of that tape that didn't have her consent to record, which is why Aidan got charged with felony wiretapping. [The Glarer] Okay, but you're not denying that she said that, right? [Grant] Listen, I have never been awake at 12:30 in the morning. I'm not a woman. I've never been confronted with that situation. I would never pass judgment on someone in that situation. [The Glarer] Every woman that I've ever heard express their opinion on it — pretty negative, dude. Just saying. Pretty negative. Especially the moms. Especially the moms. [Grant] So I don't think any people talking in that way — I don't think you've even met this woman. [The Glarer] You're right. I have not. I have not met her. [Grant] And if — I don't know if she will ever do this — but if any of you took 10 minutes, not on camera, to talk to this woman, you would find someone who believes in God, who cares about her children, who's a good mother, and who's not any of the things you made her out to be. And by God, I will defend that 'till my last day. [The Glarer] Alright. Declared. Got it. I gotta' ask you one more question though. Why are you saying stuff about Olivia Nile — Olivia Nile and her mom — being paid agents for the defense? Come on. [Grant] Okay. Hold on. Hold on. Let me just explain that. I know that's Olivia Lamb. Okay? [The Glarer] Right, yeah, same person. Yeah, yeah. [Grant] Okay, so we all know Christina Lamb does boutique PR consulting for lawyers. She's good at it. Olivia’s good at it. They should own it. I want to interview her. [The Glarer] What — how is that proof, though? That Olivia Lamb is being paid by the defense in some way? You see the problem? [Grant] Hold on. That is an extrapolation some people may make. My argument is only that what she does looks like PR for the defense. I think Olivia hasn't been paid since last year. [The Glarer] But she's saying that's not even what she does, dude. [Grant] Okay, maybe it's not. But I think Olivia's contract ran up at the end of the first trial, if you want me to be very blunt with you. [The Glarer] Contract? [Grant] Mm-hmm. [The Glarer] But her mom doesn't even do that either — what the fuck’s her mom got to do with it? [Grant] Well, why would her mom run some random boutique PR consulting firm for lawyers, and then Olivia just shows up with this extremely high-level acumen, rivaling lawyers? [The Glarer] But that’s not what she does. She's saying that's not even what her mom does or what she does. [Grant] Okay, well, I looked at her mom's website. I archived it going back a few years, so I can post the screenshots again. And I know what she advertised herself as doing. [The Glarer] But you know what I think, Grant? I think that you're a really smart guy. And I think you know you're a really smart guy. And I think what you do is, you convince yourself — because of how smart you are — that if you came up with it, it must be gospel. That's what I think. And that's where I think you get cloudy between the truth and your opinion. Because you state your opinions as though they're fact. And I think that's an ego thing. I don't even think it's malice. It’s just ego. That's what it comes off as, anyway, dude. Because everything you say — every time I ask you, "Where's your proof?" — you explain how you came to your opinion. You give me a laid-out story. Go back and listen to this later on — you'll see what I mean. [Grant] Well, I don't even doubt you, actually, that I'm firm in my convictions. If I'm not there to experience something, I do not know the truth. But I've seen the screenshots. I only found out Olivia Lamb was Olivia Lamb because I found an archived X post where she shared something very sentimental about her grandfather. I didn't like that. I didn't appreciate having to talk about that. But it became relevant because I wanted to know why she was involved in the case. I will listen to her tell me I'm wrong. I want to interview her. [The Glarer] Yeah, but you can't just, like, trap people into interviews by threatening to spread lies about them if they don't, bro. What kind of shit is that? [Grant] Nothing that I said about her grandfather, her acumen or her mother's work was incorrect... [The Glarer] But why are you even talking about her family, dude? Like, that's really low, man. Like — that's... It's low, man. It's low. Her family didn't have nothing to do with this, man. She's doing this because she cares about it. And then people start talking about people's family members and shit. And it's like — it comes off as a not-so-subtle form of intimidation, frankly, Grant. You know, trying to get somebody to shut up. [Grant] No, I don't want to do that. I want to learn about why she's interested in the case. [The Glarer] But you could see how somebody could see it that way, right? Because what if her family starts telling her, "Hey, stop talking about this. Why are we being brought into your shit because you're passionate about something?" What if her family does that and puts her in an awkward position? And then people are cheated out of some really good insight because of that. [Grant] My brother — my brother who at four years old had a colectomy, three-stage, and is developmentally disabled as a result — has a profile someone made mocking him on X. That's a profile that people I respect engage with. Usually I overlook that stuff because I don't believe the people engaging in it are trying to do that. And I hope people realize I'm not doing that to her. I authentically want to know why Olivia's covering this case. [The Glarer] That's all right. So — but that's my point, Grant. I'm just saying, like, if you believe Karen Read is guilty, why not just stick to the facts? Because you don't see me going after anybody's family. You don't see Olivia going after anybody's family, talking about people's family and exposing their family and what they do. You know what I mean? That's not cool. I don't do that. And Olivia’s saying that she will happily talk to you anytime about why she's interested in the case. You see what? That's my point. That's my point — if you believe so much in Karen Read's guilt, then the facts should speak. Everything that you put out there — the facts, the details of the case, and the way you interpret those facts — that should be enough. You shouldn't have to bring people's family members into it. Come on. I feel like you're better than that. That's all. I still have faith that you're better than that. [Grant] Yeah. And I think that's the perfect place to end, because you've given me a lot of time and I share your sentiments. I think that is crucially important. You don't see me out there in the past six months or twelve months talking about Melanie Little, or Olivia or her parents anymore. [The Glarer] I have seen improvement, yes. I have seen it. [Grant] And let me just say why: because I came to believe that there was this toxic atmosphere surrounding this case, and that I couldn't just say I thought it needed to change — I had to reflect that change in my actions. And that's why that happened. So that's it. That's how I feel. [The Glarer] Okay. Yeah, I mean, everybody’s entitled to their feelings and opinions, man. We all are. But yeah, I’m glad that we got this talk. I got to express some things I wanted to express to you. You were very receptive, and I appreciate you coming on and being respectful and being cool. And you’re welcome here anytime, Grant. I can see that we could talk about pretty much anything, and it's fine. That will always be welcome here — no matter what we disagree on. So I appreciate you, Grant. [Grant] God bless, Will, enjoy the rest of your Saturday. [The Glarer] Have a good one. Alright, Grant, y'all. Alright, I'm gonna take another call. Let's do that.

Grant Smith Ellis

27,665 просмотров • 1 год назад

Just finished a huge UPGRADE to my Polymarket Arbitrage Trading Bot 📈 $41,514 +EV - [ Right Now] ✳️ 1,032% Spread - [ Right Now] #⃣ 3X More Arbitrage Opportunities I had to break a lot of rules to get this to work, If Polymarket finds out I might be in trouble... But it was worth it! I was able to bypass the restrictions that are holding back other Arbitrage Trading Bots Here’s how it all works... MARKET MATCHING The bot is looking for arbitrages across 5 different Prediction Markets To do that we are indexing millions of individual markets To try to find the few thousand functionally identical pairs between platforms That's billions of potential matches To find the few thousand market pairs that are functionally equivalent between platforms we are using a four part matching system: 1. Keyword extraction, ranking & matching 2. Trigram, Jaccard & Vector hybrid matching algorithm of the market titles, close conditions, alternative titles & outcomes 3. LLM Prompt matching checking for functional equivalence of market rules -> Incredibly inconsistent, hence the need for part 4, building a system like this at scale will open your eyes to the shortcomings of AI 4. Human verification + 99.8% Accuracy + 6,320 Markets Matched Once we have our markets, we move onto.. ARBITRAGE DETECTION - [ UPGRADED ] To detect if there is an arbitrage we need two things Market Odds & Orderbooks Market Odds: This will show us the ‘Spread’, if the sum of Market A YES & Market B NO is less than $1, or vice versa, we have a potential arbitrage Orderbooks: This will show us the "EV", much we can arbitrage profit we can extract, according to the available liquidity and slippage of both orderbooks This is where we had been severely limited in the past, due to inadequacies of the WebSocket feeds and API rate limits Polymarket: Orderbook initial dumps & entire orderbook price levels missing when connecting hundreds of markets to the WS feed, undisclosed multi-WS rate limits Opinion: API rate limits, WS delta updates missing, WS delta updates sent in wrong order, asks sent below best bid, airdrop farming bots posting and filling their own orders breaking WS feed. Kalshi: Rate limits and minor book inaccuracies at scale PredictFun & Probable: Surprisingly accurate as of current, monitoring how they handle increasing volumes To get past these limits and scale the Arbitrage Finder we built some advanced new systems 1. Multiple Instances Instead of scaling vertically we moved to scaling horizontally, a central controller handles the deployment & management of multiple proxied worker instances that each keep a local record of a subset of the market orderbooks and detect arbitrage opportunities as soon as dif updates are received These worker instances feed the orderbook data back to the main controller which aggregates all information in one place and formats along them with relevant metadata to be fetched by our trading interfaces and applications 2. Handling “Junk Data” One of the most challenging parts of scaling this application is dealing with the inaccuracies of the data provided by the APIs that we refer to as ‘Junk Data’ Some are easy to deal with: - Book updates returned in the wrong order required an additional ‘lastTimestamp’ value at each book level which was referenced before any future updates are applied, if diff update timestamp was prior to lastTimestamp the dif update is ignored. - Missing book dumps / levels reduced almost entirely by reducing the number of CLOB tokens per WS connection - Dif ask/bid flips appearing at impossible levels are not applied Some were a lot more challenging: - Missing book updates were only detectable with revalidation & comparison, we don’t know what we don't know until we know we don't know it. More complex revalidation triggers and short recycling periods minimize the issue With these updates we can scale the number of local orderbooks we are handling at one time: Before: ~4,000 orderbooks After: ~10,000 orderbooks This, along with the improvements in orderbook accuracy, has increased arb density by 3X Meaning we’re finding 3X the amount of opportunities as before 3. Rate limit bypass To bypass the API limits that limit the quantity of markets we can subscribe to at once we had to ██████ ███ █ ██████ █████ █████████ TRADING SYSTEMS - [ NEW ] The data is only as good as you can display it, ultimately the format in which the data is served will determine how efficiently it can be acted upon We’ve created a system of interconnected tools that enable us to trade these opportunities, each with a different specific use case 1. AlertPilot Trading Terminal A dashboard displaying all the hundreds of arbitrage opportunities the bot has found across 5 different prediction markets in real time + Arbitrage Calculator, showing you exactly how much to bid to take advantage of the arbitrage according to your bankroll, fees & slippage + Double Price Chart, which helps traders to estimate how long their arbitrage take to close + Strategy Guide, explaining how to execute arbitrage trades most effectively to maximize profits + Position Manager, connect your wallets to see your open arbitrage positions, EV, profits & exits 2. AlertPilot Telegram Bot A system for getting alerts on all new arbitrage opportunities immediately, EV, Spreads & market links + Custom Settings, only see the arbitrages you’d want to take with user specific settings + Position Sell Alerts, connected to the AlertPilot Position Manager, get alerts to your phone when its time to sell your arbitrage positions + All 5 Markets, alerts on all 5 supported prediction markets: Polymarket, Kalshi, Opinion, Probable & PredictFun 3. AlertPilot Discord Bot Private chat rooms and arbitrage alerts on the AlertPilot Discord Group + Custom Alerts, the best arbitrage alerts are sent to the discord channel + Support, traders answering your questions on Arbitrage Trading 4. Arbitrage Trading Terminal [ SOON ] A trading terminal built specifically for Arbitrage + Atomic Execution, enter positions on two platforms at the same time + Visualize the Arbitrage, trade with both charts in one place, see the gap close as you take your positions + Manage positions across multiple prediction markets in one place

SecureZero 

33,200 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

On March 15th, 2021, an anonymous Twitter user asked Harvard Medical professor Martin Kulldorff a question. “Do you think younger age groups and or people who have already had the virus need to be vaccinated?” Who is Martin Kulldorff? He’s a Harvard Medical School professor for 21 years, a well-known Swedish biostatistician who developed widely used software for disease mapping, the co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration on how to deal with the COVID pandemic, and an advisor to the world’s leading health organizations. What he said was that “Thinking that everyone must be vaccinated is as scientifically flawed as thinking that nobody should get COVID. Vaccines are important for older high-risk people and their caretakers. Those with prior natural infection do not need it, nor do children.” Natural immunity. Is it a myth — a “conspiracy theory” — that once you have been sick from a virus, then you won’t get sick, or as sick, again? In fact, we’ve known for 2,500 years that natural immunity is real. “The same man was never attacked twice, never at least fatally,” wrote Thucydides, describing the plague of Athens. He observed that recovered individuals could safely nurse the sick without falling ill themselves. And yet Twitter censored Martin Kulldorff’s tweet. “Learn why health officials recommend a vaccine,” read a warning that Twitter employees put on it. For most people, the Tweet cannot be replied to, shared or liked. In other words, Twitter had decided that this professor at Harvard Medical School was wrong, and that natural immunity wasn’t really something that could protect you from COVID. Jay Bhattacharya, who’s currently our Director of the National Institutes of Health, and thus one of the highest-ranking public health officials in the world, was a Stanford epidemiologist before that. Twitter put him on a “Trends Blacklist.” Not long before we discovered this, we were told that shadow-banning was a conspiracy theory, because Twitter had said it didn’t shadow-ban. Now the European Commission is trying to censor the entire global internet. They want to put a 140 million Euro fine on X. They want to end anonymity, which was what allowed that question of Kulldorff to be asked. They want to use a “Democracy Shield” program to shield the Commission from democracy. And the Commission wants to impose “chat control” so they can read your private messages. It just gets worse and worse. Unsubstantiated and likely false claims of Russian government election interference through TikTok and social media were made in Romania and in the Czech Republic. Truth is not something that anybody holds as a possession and rather emerges through dialogue. We’ve known that since Plato and Socrates. We need free speech for science, public health, and national security. It’s essential to journalism, democracy, and human freedom. Free speech enabled civilization; censorship threatens it. This is the only political cause that I would die for. And yet there is currently an active coordination between Stanford, Brazil, Australia, and others to impose what I think we can call, without exaggeration, global totalitarianism. They’re pushing for digital identification that will end anonymity online. Why is that? Why are these guys behaving in this way? When Elon Musk took over Twitter on October 28th, 2022, unprecedented insight into multiple secret government mass censorship efforts emerged from this exploration. We had unlimited access to Twitter files. They revealed that the mainstream news reporters, who don’t deserve the name, were demanding censorship. No true journalist demands censorship of his fellow journalists. What emerged from this was an understanding of something we call the “Censorship Industrial Complex,” which directly grew out of the military industrial complex and was run by active or former intelligence community officials who often operate under that banner. It led to multiple congressional investigations and hearings, and it spread across every social media platform. So we now know the censorship that occurred, not just at Twitter, but at YouTube, at Facebook, TikTok, and other platforms. What is the Censorship Industrial Complex? The model isn’t that complicated to understand. The government chooses people whom they call “researchers” to serve as censors. These are government-funded individuals who often come from the intelligence community and foreign policy establishment. They work at non-governmental organizations funded by governments or at universities funded by governments. They conduct “fact checks” to serve as “trusted flaggers.” These “trusted flaggers” demand censorship by social media platforms. It’s all done in secret. They’re looking to censor narratives. This is essential because, as decades of good cognitive science have shown, people understand and retain information through storytelling. We think in terms of stories, not bullet points. And so they were out to censor whole narratives. From the Stanford censorship project on COVID, the “Virality Project,” they said they wanted to censor “true stories” of vaccine side effects. Why? Because it might “fuel hesitancy.” In other words, they want to control your behavior. They don’t want you to receive true information that might lead you to not get the vaccine. If that isn’t totalitarianism straight out of 1984, I don’t know what it. These people were on the verge of passing legislation in the United States that would’ve authorized the National Science Foundation to choose these “researcher” censors. I’m presenting slides to Europeans and the world for situational awareness into what totalitarian politicians and bureaucrats have planned because this is still going strong. Stanford helped the US government censor COVID dissidents, and then they lied about it. You might be detecting a pattern. They’re really not interested in censoring “misinformation.’ They’re very interested in censoring true information. The censors flagged an Israeli preprint which came out in December, 2020 and found, lo and behold, that natural immunity is a real thing. In fact, it’s more protective than the vaccine. But the censors flagged somebody’s Google Drive. “See the following Google Drive links being used to compile testimonies about vaccine shedding, Covid videos, showing side effects and whatnot.” Google then removed that content from that person’s Google Drive. You don’t control your Google Drive. Contrary to Stanford’s claim that the project did not ask social media platforms to remove any content, they privately said they did. And we know that many hundreds of thousands of tweets and Facebook posts were removed, even though they were a hundred percent accurate. In fact, in 2021, Stanford’s “Virality Project” flagged accurate claims that the World Health Organization did not recommend vaccinating children. The people who spread the misinformation are the people demanding the censorship. They claimed Covid couldn’t have come from a lab, that the Covid vaccine prevented infection, and that natural immunity didn’t exist. The only solution to hate speech and misinformation is free speech. If you censor false information, how would anybody get the true information? The whole point is the debate. They lied when they said false information travels faster than true information. It’s a completely bogus study and involved six seconds of content on Twitter. Who are these people? As of 2020, there were so many former FBI employees at Twitter that they called them “Bu alumni.” They created their own private Slack channel and a crib sheet to onboard new FBI arrivals. Intriguingly, we discovered that the general counsel of the FBI — arguably the second most powerful person of the FBI, or maybe the first, if you think, consider that what their actual job is to decide what the FBI can and can’t do — resigned from FBI in early 2020 and went to Twitter to take the deputy general counsel role. Isn’t that interesting? Somebody in one of the most powerful legal positions in the world would take a junior legal role at a social media company. Why would that be? This email popped up when we were going through Twitter files and it really jumped out at us. It’s from the director of policy at Twitter. “We have seen a sustained if uncoordinated” — supposedly — “effort by the intelligence community to push us to share more information and change our API policies. They’re probing and pushing everywhere they can.” The Hunter Biden laptop censorship occurred later that year. The FBI and the intelligence community discredited accurate, factual information about Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings both before and after the New York Post revealed the contents of his laptop on October 14th, 2020. How could the FBI spread false information about something that nobody knew about? Because the FBI had Hunter Biden’s laptop, which showed his family’s massive influence peddling scheme. It consisted of accepting tens of millions of dollars, including from the Chinese government. The FBI had been sitting on that laptop since December of 2019. They had been given it by the computer repair store owner, who had been given the laptop by Hunter Biden, likely because he dropped it in his bathtub or in the pool, when he was on one of his many crack and alcohol benders. The government strategy is always the same: spread disinformation first, then demand censorship of accurate information on the basis of it . “The FBI came to us in the summer of 2020,” Mark Zuckerberg told Joe Rogan two years later, “and they were like, ‘Hey, you should be on the alert. We thought that there was a lot of Russian propaganda in 2016. There’s about to be some kind of dump.’” In the summer of 2020, the New York Post had not published the story about the Hunter Biden laptop. It would only come out in October. We see something very interesting show up in the Twitter files: the Aspen Institute, an intermediary between the intelligence community and the public. It’s known as a Davos-style gab fest in the United States. It’s also the place where intelligence community operations are run. They hosted a workshop to train reporters and all of the social media’s top censorship officials, known as “trust and safety officials,” how to deal with a story they would hear in the future relating to Hunter Biden and Barisma. A few months earlier, the Stanford Cyber Policy Center had published a report attacking what we in the United States call the Pentagon Papers Principle. The Pentagon Papers Principle says that if a government official gives me, a journalist, a bunch of Pentagon documents showing that we’re losing the war in Vietnam, I, as a journalist, can publish them, and not risk prison. That was decided in a famous Supreme Court case in 1971. Stanford argued that, really, we should get rid of that principle, which may be the most important investigative journalism principle in the United States, and said, “You should cover the person who leaked the materials, not the leaked emails.” In other words, you should cover and expose the whistleblower. The person who exposed the Pentagon Papers is the real bad guy, not the DOD, CIA, and presidents who had lied to us for over a decade. Stanford was training the journalists and the social media trust and safety officers in how to cover a story that had not yet come out. This is known as “pre-bunking,” and it’s also part of the European Union strategy to shield themselves from democracy. When the Hunter Biden story appeared October 22nd, Twitter’s trust and safety censorship official said it didn’t violate its terms of service. There’s nothing illegal about any of this. The Supreme Court has made it very clear that you’re allowed to report on information that’s been leaked to you. At that moment, the former FBI general counsel, Jim Baker, argued vigorously that Twitter really needed to censor it. Baker won and they censored the story. It’s not that we didn’t hear about the Hunter Biden laptop story when it came out. I certainly did. But we had the impression that there was something wrong with it, that it was not really the whole story. And so many of us dismissed it. What they had done was a psyop on this major story. They had changed our perception of the story. And it worked. It worked on me, it worked on everybody I knew. What is the role of the intelligence community of social media companies? The former CIA people are the head of elections at Meta, and Google’s head of trust and safety. Former and current CIA officers have a history of spreading misinformation and promoting the Russiagate conspiracy theory. We now know that between 2018 and 2023, there were 36 people from the CIA 68 from the FBI 44, from the National Security Administration and 68 from the Department of Homeland Security who had moved to work at the social media platforms. This is not unique to the United States. My colleague Cecilia Jilková, the daughter of famous Czech dissidents, discovered that European Union officials claimed, days before the European elections in 2024, that a “pro-Kremlin website” was spreading propaganda and were paying off European politicians. That was the headline in Politico. We wrote to them and asked, “Where’s the evidence of this? Just go ahead and share the evidence to support your accusation days before the European parliamentary elections.” Nobody was arrested. They never produced the evidence. The former Czech president, Václav Klaus, who was accused of this, said, “We don’t even know what the ‘Voice of Europe’ is.” Another Czech politician said, “How could I have known it would be a security threat? At the time I gave the interview, they weren’t on any list.” Another said, “If they’re such a big threat, why did the European Parliament let the Voice of Europe’s journalists inside?” Nobody responded. Nobody talked to us. This was a disinformation campaign carried by Politico, which, in my view, is a suspect publication. In the spring of 2022, Barack Obama went to Stanford to give a speech at the Stanford Cyber Policy Center run by Michael McFaul, his former ambassador to Russia. Obama said misinformation harms democracy and urged support for legislation in Congress that would empower government-appointed researchers to serve as “trusted flaggers.” Six days later, the Department of Homeland Security rolled out their Disinformation Governance Board. What a coincidence that they got Obama to frame the issue for them. Facebook in 2021 censored accurate vaccine information so the White House would help it to get data from Europe. In addition to removing vaccine misinformation, wrote Facebook to the White House, we have been focused on reducing the virality of content discouraging vaccines that does not contain actionable misinformation. White House said jump, and Facebook said how high? Why did they do it? Why would they voluntarily censor? This also emerged from the Facebook files. Nick Clegg on the left wrote an email to his colleagues. He said, “My sense is that given we’ve got bigger fish, we have to fry with the administration, e.g., data flows, it doesn’t seem like a great place for us to be.” Data flows. What’s he talking about? He’s talking about billions of dollars worth of business that he has to, that they would have to pay the European Commission for if they didn’t have the support from the Biden administration to lean on the European Commission. In other words, this was a shakedown by the White House of Facebook and it worked in France, the country of Liberté. Turns out it has a special role.... Please subscribe now to support Public's defense of free speech, watch the full video, and read the rest of the article!

Michael Shellenberger

174,297 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад