正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

PM Modi has once again asserted India's claim for a permanent seat in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). But Did you know? 🤯 In the 1950s, both the US and USSR reportedly offered India a permanent seat at the UN Security Council. But PM Nehru declined — he...

34,465 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Bold bhartiya 的头像
Bold bhartiya1 年前

Nehru’s idealism cost India decades of strategic leverage. Backing China who later betrayed us over a UNSC seat was one of the most short-sighted diplomatic blunders in our history.

Krishna 的头像
Krishna1 年前

Chutiya saala

AtuL AgrawaaL 🇮🇳 的头像
AtuL AgrawaaL 🇮🇳1 年前

प्रधानमंत्री मोदी ने एक बार फिर संयुक्त राष्ट्र सुरक्षा परिषद (यूएनएससी) में स्थायी सीट के लिए भारत के दावे पर जोर दिया है। लेकिन क्या आप जानते हैं? 🤯 1950 के दशक में, अमेरिका और यूएसएसआर दोनों ने कथित तौर पर भारत को संयुक्त राष्ट्र सुरक्षा परिषद में स्थायी सीट की पेशकश की थी। लेकिन प्रधानमंत्री नेहरू ने मना कर दिया - वह चाहते थे कि चीन को पहले यह सीट मिले। उन्होंने अमेरिका में चीन के लिए पैरवी भी की और 1962 के युद्ध के एक साल बाद 1963 में भारत ने चीन की यूएनएससी बोली के समर्थन में मतदान किया। साभार: डीडी

Dhanesh 🇮🇳 🚩 的头像
Dhanesh 🇮🇳 🚩1 年前

Nehru backed China for the UNSC seat. China gave us betrayal in return. Now India, the world’s most populous democracy, still awaits that permanent chair. One wrong decision. 70 years of delay. #IndiaUNSC #ModiForUNSC #HistoryMatters

Pervaiz Ahmed 的头像
Pervaiz Ahmed1 年前

"History has a strange way of circling back — what Nehru gave up, Modi now demands. 🇮🇳🛑"

Pervaiz Ahmed 的头像
Pervaiz Ahmed1 年前

"Imagine giving away your seat at the table, then fighting decades to get it back. That’s India’s UNSC story. 🪑🌍"

Nut Boult 的头像
Nut Boult1 年前

Remember this as our nation strides powerfully onto the global arena: India first, always and forever. Bharat deserves its rightful place at the head of every table. No more sitting back; it’s time to lead! 🇮🇳

Sachin Singh 的头像
Sachin Singh1 年前

Nehru's decisions in the 1950s, particularly his refusal of the UNSC seat offers from both the US and USSR, stand as a testament to shortsighted idealism that crippled India's global stature for decades. His prioritization of China's inclusion over India's own strategic interests, despite the backdrop of Cold War tensions, was a grave miscalculation. Even after China's betrayal in the 1962 war, Nehru continued to lobby for China's UNSC membership, a move that not only undermined India's position but also highlighted a disturbing naivety in his foreign policy. This legacy of deference to China, coupled with his failure to anticipate the geopolitical ramifications, has left India playing catch-up on the world stage, a delay that Modi now seeks to rectify. Nehru's actions were not just a diplomatic blunder; they were a betrayal of India's potential to lead on the global arena.

Times News Updates 的头像
Times News Updates1 年前

From gifting China a seat to begging for one—history hits different!

Varun ⭐️⭐️ 的头像
Varun ⭐️⭐️1 年前

What a looser Failure politician, gandhi n Nehru biggest glitch in Indian history.

相关视频

Zimbabwe has been elected as one of the 10 non-permanent members of the 15-member United Nations Security Council for a two-year term, beginning on 1 January 2027 and ending on 31 December 2028. Zimbabwe will become one of three African countries serving on the 15-member Council, joining the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Liberia. The DRC and Liberia were elected in June 2025 and are serving two-year terms from 2026 to 2027 on the body responsible for maintaining international peace and security. For the next two years, Zimbabwe will have a seat at the table when the world discusses wars, conflicts, sanctions, peacekeeping missions, and other major international security crises. The country will be able to vote on Security Council resolutions and participate directly in debates and negotiations on some of the most important global issues. Although it will not have veto power, which remains reserved for the five permanent members, the United States, Russia, China, the United Kingdom, and France, the seat is a significant diplomatic achievement. It raises Zimbabwe’s international profile and gives the country a voice in some of the world’s most important security discussions, although it does not give Zimbabwe the power to block Security Council decisions. Zimbabwe’s election to the United Nations Security Council marks the country’s third time on the powerful body. It previously served as a non-permanent member in 1983–1984 and again in 1991–1992. Its return marks the first time under President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s presidency. Beyond serving on the United Nations Security Council, Zimbabwe’s main gain is diplomatic influence. It brings no veto power or direct financial benefits, but it does raise Zimbabwe’s international profile and gives it a place in some of the world’s most important diplomatic discussions.

Hopewell Chin’ono

51,091 次观看 • 1 个月前