正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Polkadot Restructures Staking Parameters to Enhance Network Security and Liquidity Polkadot activates Referenda #1909 and #1910, enacting a fundamental shift in the network’s security and reward architecture. The updates reinforce a 10,000 $DOT minimum self-stake requirement for validators while introducing 0% commission models and permissionless chilling for under-bonded nodes...

19,529 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

After an incredibly successful week at Token2049, the highlight was undoubtedly presenting our SPIN whitepaper at the Bleeding Edge Summit! While still waiting for the official video, we would like to share a recording from the audience. With SPIN, we're introducing a revolutionary approach to building proof-of-stake blockchains. There is a well-known chicken and egg problem when it comes to launching a new proof-of-stake blockchain. You need high value at stake to achieve economic security, but at the same time, for achieving that, you already need to be secure. With SPIN, you can borrow security from well-established networks such as Polkadot or Ethereum. Unlike a Layer 2, which completely gives up chain sovereignty and frequently sacrifices scalability and throughput to satisfy Layer 1 validation protocols, SPIN maintains full sovereignty of the Fast Chain while still benefiting from the security of the Anchor Chain. Our SPIN protocol addresses this fundamental challenge by enabling a fast, sovereign chain to maintain and grow its economic security with its own validator network, while simultaneously leveraging an established anchor chain to provide a second layer of finality. With SPIN, we take an unlimited set of stakers, reduce it to a limited set of validators who can run very quickly, producing a consecutive sequence of blocks during their staker period. This design allows for blocks with very small block times, as low as 0.1 seconds and beyond. Our full SPIN whitepaper will be released soon.

QF Network

25,547 次观看 • 1 年前

FLASHBACK Sept 22, 1965 ZA Bhutto In UN Security Council : Indian Occupied Kashmir, A Disputed Territory: "..... Jammu and Kashmir is not an integral part of India and has never been an integral part of India...." (Watch Historical Footage). Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, PR of Pakistan to the UN Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the UN Ishaq Dar 6 January 2025 - SFJ Communique To Prime Minister of Pakistan Re: Pakistan’s Election to UN Security Council Seat Sub:Support The Right to Self-Determination through Referendum For People Of Indian Occupied Punjab and Kashmir. Honorable Prime Minister: Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) ( is an international human rights advocacy group which believes in and adheres to UN Charter and works to promote the Right To Self Determination and human rights as enshrined in Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR”) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. To this end, SFJ is holding the first ever global non-governmental Khalistan Referendum under the supervision of a nonaligned panel of experts - the Punjab Referendum Commission - on the question “Should Indian Governed Punjab Be An Independent Country?”. We are writing to extend our warmest congratulations to you and the nation of Pakistan on Pakistan’s successful election to a seat in the United Nations Security Council. This significant achievement reflects Pakistan’s dedication to international peace, justice, and the principles enshrined in the UN Charter. Your recent statement reaffirming the right to self-determination for the people of Kashmir through the plebiscite as prescribed in UNSC Resolution 21 of 1948 is both timely and commendable. It is a reminder to the international community of the moral and legal imperative to support oppressed peoples’ right to seek freedom and justice. While unequivocally supporting the right self-determination for the people of Kashmir through UN backed plebiscite to which India has reneged on, SFJ urges your government to consider extending its support to the Sikh community’s ongoing quest for self-determination. The global referendum being organized by SFJ is a significant effort to highlight and advocate through peaceful and democratic means, their demand for a sovereign homeland Khalistan in the Indian Governed region of Punjab. We firmly believe that Pakistan’s leadership at the Security Council can pave the way for constructive dialogue and meaningful resolutions that uphold the right of all peoples to determine their own destiny and political future of their homeland. Pakistan’s support for Sikh people’s movement to achieve Khalistan through Referendum, will further strengthen Pakistan’s longstanding stance of right to self-determination for the people of Kashmir through a UN backed plebiscite.

Gurpatwant Singh Pannun

13,861 次观看 • 1 年前

Most $TAO holders staking right now are trusting the wrong validators. Not because they are careless. Because nobody explained what the numbers on the Validators page actually mean. There is a tool inside Taostats that shows you exactly which validators are genuinely working and which ones are collecting your emissions without contributing anything to the network. It is free. It is live. And almost nobody is using it correctly. Here is exactly how to read it. Step 1: Understand what Dominance actually measures. Dominance is not popularity. It is not a ranking of which validator is best. It describes a validator's Stake Weight as a percentage of all validator stake weights combined across the network. Stake Weight is calculated as: root stake multiplied by 0.18, plus all alpha staked across subnets converted into TAO. Root stake is deliberately discounted at 18 percent of its face value. Alpha stake carries the full weight. This means a validator with deep subnet-level staking is structurally more powerful than one sitting purely on root, even if their raw TAO numbers look similar on the surface. When you see a validator with rising Dominance over time, it is not just getting more popular. It is getting more alpha stake directed toward it across active subnets. That is a meaningful signal about where serious capital is moving inside the network. Step 2: Check the Take percentage before you delegate anything. Take is the percentage of emissions the validator keeps for itself. Everything above that number flows to you as a nominator. A validator with a 18 percent Take keeps 18 percent of the emissions their position generates and distributes the remainder to stakeholders. A validator with a 50 percent Take is keeping half of what your stake earns. Most people never look at this number before delegating. It is the first number you should check. A high Take is not automatically a red flag if the validator is genuinely performing well and contributing to the network. But a high Take combined with low VTrust in their subnet performance page is the exact combination that should make you move your stake immediately. Step 3: Open the Validator Performance page and find the VTrust score. This is the number most holders never see. VTrust measures how closely a validator's weight assignments align with the honest stake-weighted majority across the network inside each subnet they operate in. Validators are responsible for evaluating miner output and assigning scores. Those scores go into Yuma Consensus and determine which miners earn emissions. A validator doing genuine evaluation work will have weights that align closely with the honest consensus. High VTrust. Consistent emissions. Reliable nominator returns. A validator that is weight copying, meaning they are simply copying the Yuma consensus scores back onto themselves rather than doing real evaluation, will show a flagged return on Taostats. Their nom/24hr/1k TAO score appears in red. This is Taostats telling you directly: this validator is extracting value from the network without contributing to it. When you stake to a weight copying validator, you are funding a free rider. Step 4: Watch the 24hr Nominator Change column. This number moves fast and it tells you something before any other signal does. A validator losing nominators over consecutive days is a validator that informed stakers are quietly leaving. A validator gaining nominators rapidly while their VTrust is healthy is a validator attracting attention for the right reasons. The 24hr column is the on-chain version of sentiment before sentiment becomes a narrative on social media. Step 5: Check Active subnets alongside Total Weight. Active tells you the number of subnets where the validator has a parent or child hotkey running. A validator with high Total Weight but low Active subnets is concentrated. They are running a specific strategy in specific markets. A validator with broad Active coverage across many subnets is building a wider surface area for emissions and is more exposed to the overall network performance rather than any single subnet cycle. Neither is inherently better. But knowing which type of validator you are delegating to tells you what you are actually betting on when you stake. Step 6: Check the Weight Change column over time. Total Weight is a snapshot. Weight Change is momentum. A validator with stable or growing Total Weight over consecutive days is attracting net new stake consistently. A validator with declining Weight Change is losing stake faster than it is gaining it. Most people look at the current number. The people positioning correctly are watching which direction the number is moving and how fast. The difference between a good validator and a dangerous one is not obvious from the outside. It is not the name. It is not the size. It is the VTrust score, the Take percentage, the nominator trend, and whether Taostats is showing their return in red or not. Every one of those signals is sitting on the Validators page right now. Free. Live. Updated every block. The investors who read the data layer before the narrative layer will not need to explain their staking decisions later. Open Taostats tonight. You will want to find this post when you do.

2xnmore

11,771 次观看 • 2 个月前

Tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs) is one of the most transformative developments in finance and blockchain. Traditionally illiquid assets such as real estate, private equity, commodities, and art are digitized into blockchain-based tokens, enabling fractional ownership, greater liquidity, global accessibility, enhanced transparency, and efficient trading without intermediaries. Experts (incl. BlackRock) see tokenized RWAs as a multi-trillion-dollar shift. Projections range from hundreds of billions to trillions in coming years, driven by institutional adoption, clearer regulation, and scaling from pilots to production. Enter Realio Network ( a leading player built specifically to capture this RWA revolution. Realio Network’s Cutting-Edge Technology Realio Network is an interoperable Layer-1 blockchain developed using the Cosmos SDK, with full EVM compatibility (allowing Ethereum-style smart contracts) and powered by the Comet BFT (formerly Tendermint) consensus engine. It features a unique native multi-staking Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism, the first of its kind, that secures the network not just with its native token but also with real-world value through staking of tokenized RWAs and hybrid security tokens. As a multi-chain ecosystem, Realio leverages the IBC protocol for seamless interoperability across EVM and non-EVM chains (like Ethereum, Algorand, Binance Smart Chain, Solana and Base - bridges), enabling compliant issuance, management, and trading of digitally native RWAs. It’s open-source, permissionless, and compliance-focused, bridging traditional finance (TradFi) with decentralized finance (DeFi) while reducing barriers for issuers and investors. The $RIO Token: The Heart of the Network $RIO is the native gas and utility token of the Realio Network. It powers all transactions on the chain paying for gas fees, executing smart contracts, and facilitating operations across the ecosystem. Validators and delegators can bond $RIO (along with other assets like security tokens) to secure the network and earn block rewards, creating a system backed by both crypto and real-world value. With a capped supply of 175million total, depending on sources and multi-chain presence, $RIO drives governance participation, staking rewards, and overall network utility. It’s purely a utility token (not an investment in the entity), with value driven by network adoption and speculation always DYOR. Realio isn’t just infrastructure it’s building a full ecosystem for RWAs. Starting with Freehold Wallet This non-custodial, multi-chain DeFi wallet app is built directly on Realio’s blockchain infrastructure. It offers secure management of digital assets across chains, portfolio analytics, staking, and investment tools with a beginner-friendly mobile experience (available on iOS). Freehold empowers users to access and interact with RWAs seamlessly, and it enables anyone to tokenize any RWAs on the Realio Network Layer-1 blockchain, lowering barriers for creators and issuers to bring real-world assets on-chain. Districts A real-world-themed immersive virtual world that connects physical and digital realities. Users can own tokenized districts (RWAs) and shape the virtual world. Built on Realio Layer-1 with its own token $DSTRX “Own a piece of the digital world. Shape its future. Build your legacy.” Adding $RST: Hybrid Equity & Security Token $RST is a pioneering hybrid digital security token in the Realio ecosystem. Issued under Reg D/S, it gives holders real equity ownership and profit-sharing in Realio Technology LTD (the entity behind the network’s IP and development), plus blockchain utility features. Realio Network leads the RWA boom with strong tech, $RIO utility token, and tools like Freehold + visionary Districts project. Worth exploring if you’re into tokenized assets always DYOR and mind the risks! #RWAtokenization #Crypto #bitcoin #Binance

JA

52,350 次观看 • 7 个月前

Vitalik Buterin explains why proof-of-stake is more secure than proof-of-work “I think proof of stake is very secure because to attack the system, you need to have basically as much stake as the rest of the network. Right now, for example, we have 5 million ETH staking, which means you have to come up with 5 million ETH and then join the network.” At the time of this writing, more than 37 million ETH are being staked, with 3 million ETH waiting to join via the validator queue. At today’s prices, that’s more than $80 billion of ETH someone would have to acquire to attack the network and revert finalized blocks, which is more than the cost of attacking even the Bitcoin network by some estimates. The other defense mechanism that proof-of-stake has that proof-of-work doesn’t is slashing, which makes Ethereum antifragile. Vitalik explains: “Recovering from attacks is much easier in proof-of-stake than proof-of-work. For many kinds of attacks you do against [the Ethereum] network, we have this concept of automatic slashing. In order to revert a finalized block, you basically have to have a big portion of your validators sign two conflicting messages. This is something where once these messages are on the network, you can go and prove ‘these people did it.’ So we have this feature in the protocol where you basically take all these people who provably misbehaved and you burn their coins.” Vitalik also acknowledges the possibility of censoring attacks, where if 1/3rd of validators refuse to attest, the chain can’t finalize. But, as he explains, Ethereum has a contingency plan for this as well: “Everyone who got censored would create a minority chain, and the community would have to do a soft fork. The would have to say, ‘this chain is clearly attacking us and this one is not attacking us, so we’re going to join this chain.’ Then what happens is, on that new chain, the attackers also lose a lot of coins. The difference between proof-of-stake and proof-of-work is that in a proof-of-stake system, you can identify specific participants — and this isn’t a human going in and saying ‘I don’t like you’. It’s all automated.” One last benefit of proof-of-stake is that security scales with the value of the network. As Vitalik put it five years ago, it is really relative security, and not absolute security, that matters: “The security needs of a thing have to be proportional to the size of that thing, because as a thing gets bigger, its enemies become bigger and more well-motivated. If BTC were 100x as big as it is today, the value from destroying it would be 100x higher, and the kinds of actors that would want to care about destroying it would be much bigger and scarier. This is also why countries of all sizes have roughly similarly sized militaries as a percentage of GDP. Hence, cost of attack divided by market cap really is the correct statistic to measure, and in the long run issuance-free PoW really does look not that good." Source: Lex Fridman (Jun 2021)

Etherealize

102,091 次观看 • 5 个月前