“Polls are based on the idea that history is a good guide to the future… there are occasions when (polymarkets) perform better than statistical models, especially when history is not a good guide to the future” — CNN

95.4% accuracy 🧐

Poly market is always one step ahead because someone always has insider info. Why not get paid for it…

Past performance is not indicative of future performance

Welcome to the era of the Polymarket sharp.

If history were human, it would look at today like a blockbuster.

Polymarket > everything else

Well, since it's people's opinion, it's why they show the best results.

@rawsalerts People vote with their money. 🤷‍♂️

Almost like they have some kind of inside edge

Polls aren't always accurate predictions.

Polls rely on history repeating itself. Polymarket thrives exactly when history breaks and people have real money on the line. That's why betting markets keep outperforming pundits in chaotic times.

Polymarkets > historians. Alpha right there. WAGMI.

Polymarket always seems to perform better

maybe true

Polymarket data will always be better

That's true

@rawsalerts Polls are just opinions. Gambling ensures there is skin in the game.

@rawsalerts Hmmm…

history can also be a bad guide as well, polymarket for the win

@rawsalerts CNN knows all, especially when the script is properly followed...

which is never

Polymarket is the new crystal 🔮 ball of the 21st century.

@rawsalerts Legends

Predicting the future is inherently uncertain making polymarkets a valuable tool when trends defy history

@rawsalerts That makes sense. When the future doesn’t look like the past, markets that reflect real-time sentiment can sometimes beat old models.

历史 不 能 完 全 预 测 未来 。

real-time vibes beat old data every time

Wow

Polymarket always ahead

insider trading on ur app is pretty rampant

feels like history’s already cooked

Summary? @grok

History's a terrible teacher in a world running on new code.

Polymarkets price in change faster than polls ever can