Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

polymarket has a manipulation problem nobody talks about UMA holders can literally propose any resolution even if it doesn't match what actually happened here's how they pulled it off market: "will the US launch a ground operation against cartels in mexico by january 31" the market dropped to 1c...

ramperxx's profile picture

ramper

1,449 subscribers

30,513 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Breaking🚨: Merz says "disillusioned" with US and Israel over Iran. "At this point I am disillusioned simply because the US and Israel claimed at the beginning that they could solve this problem within days. Now I must recognize: It is not solved." Said Germany and EU also have "own European ideas on how to get to a resolution of the conflict." Will continue own diplomatic efforts in coordination with US. This was the second public criticism of US by Merz in one day. Earlier Merz said about US in Iran: "an entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership".
0:41

Breaking🚨: Merz says "disillusioned" with US and Israel over Iran. "At this point I am disillusioned simply because the US and Israel claimed at the beginning that they could solve this problem within days. Now I must recognize: It is not solved." Said Germany and EU also have "own European ideas on how to get to a resolution of the conflict." Will continue own diplomatic efforts in coordination with US. This was the second public criticism of US by Merz in one day. Earlier Merz said about US in Iran: "an entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership".

Michaela Kuefner

297,581 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

BREAKING: Senator Kennedy just introduced a resolution that would PREVENT members of Congress from collecting a paycheck during a shutdown. "This resolution is about SHARED SACRIFICE," and says that he doesn't want to punish anyone by offering this, but Democrats LOVE to punish everyone they can if they think it hurts Trump too. The left has USED the leverage of pain trying to beat Trump. Their TDS is so severe that they have NO REGARD for how their actions hurt us.
4:43

BREAKING: Senator Kennedy just introduced a resolution that would PREVENT members of Congress from collecting a paycheck during a shutdown. "This resolution is about SHARED SACRIFICE," and says that he doesn't want to punish anyone by offering this, but Democrats LOVE to punish everyone they can if they think it hurts Trump too. The left has USED the leverage of pain trying to beat Trump. Their TDS is so severe that they have NO REGARD for how their actions hurt us.

Gunther Eagleman™

20,983 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

There's a way to win on Polymarket no matter who wins. Buy YES in one place, NO in another. If they don't add up to a dollar, you locked a profit. Before the event even happens. Here's how the arbitrage actually works and how to master it: This is the closest thing to free money on Polymarket. Every market has a YES and a NO. One of them MUST resolve to $1. The other goes to zero. So in theory, YES + NO should always cost exactly $1. But in thin or messy markets, they don't. Sometimes you can buy: > YES at 0.48 > NO at 0.49 > total cost: 0.97 This guy does it every day: [ He also uploaded a full guide on how to build the same bot. One side pays you $1 at resolution no matter what. He spends 97 cents to guarantee a dollar. That 3 cents is locked, risk-free. There's also the cross-market version. The same event sometimes has two separate markets at different prices. Buy the cheap YES in one, the cheap NO in the other, and pocket the gap. Sounds easy, right? But here's the honest part: These gaps close in about 2.7 seconds now. By the time you click by hand, a bot already took it. So the manual version only really survives in low-liquidity markets the bots ignore. The fast version? That lives in compiled code with a VPS sitting next to the exchange. If you can code, this is one of the cleanest edges i know. If you can't, stick to the thin markets where speed matters less. Good luck!
0:40

There's a way to win on Polymarket no matter who wins. Buy YES in one place, NO in another. If they don't add up to a dollar, you locked a profit. Before the event even happens. Here's how the arbitrage actually works and how to master it: This is the closest thing to free money on Polymarket. Every market has a YES and a NO. One of them MUST resolve to $1. The other goes to zero. So in theory, YES + NO should always cost exactly $1. But in thin or messy markets, they don't. Sometimes you can buy: > YES at 0.48 > NO at 0.49 > total cost: 0.97 This guy does it every day: [ He also uploaded a full guide on how to build the same bot. One side pays you $1 at resolution no matter what. He spends 97 cents to guarantee a dollar. That 3 cents is locked, risk-free. There's also the cross-market version. The same event sometimes has two separate markets at different prices. Buy the cheap YES in one, the cheap NO in the other, and pocket the gap. Sounds easy, right? But here's the honest part: These gaps close in about 2.7 seconds now. By the time you click by hand, a bot already took it. So the manual version only really survives in low-liquidity markets the bots ignore. The fast version? That lives in compiled code with a VPS sitting next to the exchange. If you can code, this is one of the cleanest edges i know. If you can't, stick to the thin markets where speed matters less. Good luck!

Dexter's Lab

11,583 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Russia FM Lavrov dismantled the Bahrain UN resolution on the Strait of Hormuz The resolution authorizes "all interested states" to take "all necessary defensive measures" in the Strait. But who decides what's proportionate? The same states authorized to act. "We know how our Western colleagues handled supposedly defensive Security Council decisions -- they turned them upside down and used them for aggression." These measures would also operate on the territory of Gulf coastal states who have no say in them. "A direct violation of their sovereignty." Then he uses Trump's own words against it. Trump said days ago that once military operations end, Hormuz navigation resumes normally. Lavrov: "So the problem isn't making demands of Iran -- stop the military operations." China is telling Gulf partners the exact same thing. Stop the war, navigation returns. The resolution doesn't even acknowledge Iran was attacked first. Pushing it through "in the midst of what the United States itself calls negotiations" will antagonize Tehran. So either someone wants to blow up whatever diplomatic process exists -- or the talk of negotiations is cover for another attack, "as happened in June last year and February this year." In that case, this resolution is retroactive legitimization of aggression. On Article 51: the US attacked Iran and called it "preventive self-defense" even though Iran never attacked them. Now Gulf states invoke the same logic. But Article 51 doesn't require a Security Council resolution. Gulf states can already act under it. So why push for one? Because this was never about self-defense -- it's about legitimizing future aggression. Lavrov says he asked Gulf leaders directly on a video call: "Did Iran actually attack you?" No. But they told him Iran has wanted to attack its neighbors for 70 years, and now that the US and Israel struck first, Iran seized the opportunity. That's the argument being used to authorize military force through the UN Security Council
8:21

Russia FM Lavrov dismantled the Bahrain UN resolution on the Strait of Hormuz The resolution authorizes "all interested states" to take "all necessary defensive measures" in the Strait. But who decides what's proportionate? The same states authorized to act. "We know how our Western colleagues handled supposedly defensive Security Council decisions -- they turned them upside down and used them for aggression." These measures would also operate on the territory of Gulf coastal states who have no say in them. "A direct violation of their sovereignty." Then he uses Trump's own words against it. Trump said days ago that once military operations end, Hormuz navigation resumes normally. Lavrov: "So the problem isn't making demands of Iran -- stop the military operations." China is telling Gulf partners the exact same thing. Stop the war, navigation returns. The resolution doesn't even acknowledge Iran was attacked first. Pushing it through "in the midst of what the United States itself calls negotiations" will antagonize Tehran. So either someone wants to blow up whatever diplomatic process exists -- or the talk of negotiations is cover for another attack, "as happened in June last year and February this year." In that case, this resolution is retroactive legitimization of aggression. On Article 51: the US attacked Iran and called it "preventive self-defense" even though Iran never attacked them. Now Gulf states invoke the same logic. But Article 51 doesn't require a Security Council resolution. Gulf states can already act under it. So why push for one? Because this was never about self-defense -- it's about legitimizing future aggression. Lavrov says he asked Gulf leaders directly on a video call: "Did Iran actually attack you?" No. But they told him Iran has wanted to attack its neighbors for 70 years, and now that the US and Israel struck first, Iran seized the opportunity. That's the argument being used to authorize military force through the UN Security Council

COMBATE |🇵🇷

45,465 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Bridgit Mendler on how Northwood is fixing the space economy's ground infrastructure problem: "The problem that we're solving is for every satellite, it requires a connection point back to Earth so that they can control the spacecraft." "That point of contact on Earth is called the ground infrastructure." "If you don't have it, you don't have a space mission." "It literally is just like a rock in space you're doing nothing with." "There was this whole boom around spacecraft manufacturing." "And interestingly what started becoming the longest pole in the tent was just getting the point of contact on the ground to connect with." "You could build a satellite and launch it faster than you could actually connect with it from the ground." "Which just seemed absurd." Bridgit Mendler with Erik Torenberg
1:42

Bridgit Mendler on how Northwood is fixing the space economy's ground infrastructure problem: "The problem that we're solving is for every satellite, it requires a connection point back to Earth so that they can control the spacecraft." "That point of contact on Earth is called the ground infrastructure." "If you don't have it, you don't have a space mission." "It literally is just like a rock in space you're doing nothing with." "There was this whole boom around spacecraft manufacturing." "And interestingly what started becoming the longest pole in the tent was just getting the point of contact on the ground to connect with." "You could build a satellite and launch it faster than you could actually connect with it from the ground." "Which just seemed absurd." Bridgit Mendler with Erik Torenberg

a16z

13,444 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

☝️ “The most blatant and striking actions the U.S. has taken in recent years, allegedly in defense of its interests, thousands of miles from its own borders, have been carried out without any authorization from the UN Security Council. Under what pretext did they bomb Yugoslavia? Was there a Security Council resolution? Where is Yugoslavia, and where is the United States? Who gave them the right to destroy a European capital? No one. They simply decided to do it, and they did. That, for them, is international law. And under what pretext did they invade Iraq? The alleged development of weapons of mass destruction. They invaded, destroyed the country, and turned it into a breeding ground for international terrorism. Then it turned out they were wrong. They said their intelligence had let them down. Really? You destroy an entire country and blame it on an intelligence failure? And how did they get into Syria? A Security Council resolution? No. They do whatever they want” - President Putin
1:51

☝️ “The most blatant and striking actions the U.S. has taken in recent years, allegedly in defense of its interests, thousands of miles from its own borders, have been carried out without any authorization from the UN Security Council. Under what pretext did they bomb Yugoslavia? Was there a Security Council resolution? Where is Yugoslavia, and where is the United States? Who gave them the right to destroy a European capital? No one. They simply decided to do it, and they did. That, for them, is international law. And under what pretext did they invade Iraq? The alleged development of weapons of mass destruction. They invaded, destroyed the country, and turned it into a breeding ground for international terrorism. Then it turned out they were wrong. They said their intelligence had let them down. Really? You destroy an entire country and blame it on an intelligence failure? And how did they get into Syria? A Security Council resolution? No. They do whatever they want” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

59,481 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨Let me explain what actually happened yesterday at the UNGA. It may sound technical, but for the UN it was a real revolution — and another example that Ukraine is fighting on every front and keeps winning, with true allies aren’t backing away. Every three years, RU — through Belarus — has pushed a resolution on “minimizing the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster,” avoiding any mention of UA and insisting on using the RU spelling Chernobyl instead of the correct Ukrainian Chornobyl. They also refused to acknowledge responsibility for the original disaster or for their current attacks on nuclear sites. For years, the UNGA passed this so-called “consensus resolution,” and even some of UA’s allies accepted it. But the UA delegation said no. They introduced their own resolution first, blocked every amendment from RU and Belarus, secured the vote, and then — thanks to Khrystyna Hayovyshyn — successfully moved to not even consider the Belarusian proposal since the UA one had already passed. Major kudos to UKR Mission to the UN and Andrii Melnyk
1:27

🚨Let me explain what actually happened yesterday at the UNGA. It may sound technical, but for the UN it was a real revolution — and another example that Ukraine is fighting on every front and keeps winning, with true allies aren’t backing away. Every three years, RU — through Belarus — has pushed a resolution on “minimizing the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster,” avoiding any mention of UA and insisting on using the RU spelling Chernobyl instead of the correct Ukrainian Chornobyl. They also refused to acknowledge responsibility for the original disaster or for their current attacks on nuclear sites. For years, the UNGA passed this so-called “consensus resolution,” and even some of UA’s allies accepted it. But the UA delegation said no. They introduced their own resolution first, blocked every amendment from RU and Belarus, secured the vote, and then — thanks to Khrystyna Hayovyshyn — successfully moved to not even consider the Belarusian proposal since the UA one had already passed. Major kudos to UKR Mission to the UN and Andrii Melnyk

Kateryna Lisunova

56,322 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨🇵🇸 “THE UN RESOLUTION IS A DEATH WARRANT FOR GAZA” Norman Finkelstein accuses Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, and even the Palestinian Authority, of backing a UN resolution that hands Gaza to Trump under the guise of peace. He argues they had a choice: stop the war and speak the truth, or seal the deal that dooms Gaza’s future. “The Trump peace plan and then the UN resolution, that was negotiated by Egypt, Turkey and Qatar, they all supported handing Gaza over to Trump. They had an alternative [though], an alternative of telling the truth. You could say: ‘We signed on to this resolution because we wanted to stop the war. However, we recognize that this resolution is a death warrant for Gaza. We recognize it.’ There was no gun put to your head. The Russians, when they abstained, and also the Chinese when they abstained. You know what they said? ‘We wanted to exercise our veto, but we had no choice because all the Arab states said they supported the resolution.’ And then you know what happened? The Palestinian Authority said, ‘We welcome the resolution.’ So the Russian delegation's last words were, ‘Don't say we didn't warn you.’ And that's a fact.” Norman Finkelstein
2:47

🚨🇵🇸 “THE UN RESOLUTION IS A DEATH WARRANT FOR GAZA” Norman Finkelstein accuses Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, and even the Palestinian Authority, of backing a UN resolution that hands Gaza to Trump under the guise of peace. He argues they had a choice: stop the war and speak the truth, or seal the deal that dooms Gaza’s future. “The Trump peace plan and then the UN resolution, that was negotiated by Egypt, Turkey and Qatar, they all supported handing Gaza over to Trump. They had an alternative [though], an alternative of telling the truth. You could say: ‘We signed on to this resolution because we wanted to stop the war. However, we recognize that this resolution is a death warrant for Gaza. We recognize it.’ There was no gun put to your head. The Russians, when they abstained, and also the Chinese when they abstained. You know what they said? ‘We wanted to exercise our veto, but we had no choice because all the Arab states said they supported the resolution.’ And then you know what happened? The Palestinian Authority said, ‘We welcome the resolution.’ So the Russian delegation's last words were, ‘Don't say we didn't warn you.’ And that's a fact.” Norman Finkelstein

Mario Nawfal

13,901 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

SemiAnalysis' Jordan Nanos reveals the OpenAI engineers scrolling their own kernel code had no idea what it did line by line, and it didn't matter because the AI does "It's not slop, because it performs, but it's literally just AI-generated assembly basically puked out in Gluon, this low-level kernel programming language that they built on top of Triton, which uses this really interesting programming model." "The point is, the guys who were scrolling through this code with us, it was kind of clear that they know a whole bunch about hardware, they know a whole bunch about the concepts in the system, and they just have no idea what this MLA kernel that they're showing us for DeepSeek actually does." "You can go line by line and it's like nope, nope, nope." "But it doesn't matter. The AI understands it, the AI tests it, and you see the results. It produces correct kernels that perform really well." "And I think this is just a sign of what's to come again." "That actual code is not necessarily something that a human has to reason about deeply, if the AI knows how to manipulate the data movement and the processing elements on the hardware that you've given it." ________ More takeaways from OpenAI's Jalapeno development:
1:11

SemiAnalysis' Jordan Nanos reveals the OpenAI engineers scrolling their own kernel code had no idea what it did line by line, and it didn't matter because the AI does "It's not slop, because it performs, but it's literally just AI-generated assembly basically puked out in Gluon, this low-level kernel programming language that they built on top of Triton, which uses this really interesting programming model." "The point is, the guys who were scrolling through this code with us, it was kind of clear that they know a whole bunch about hardware, they know a whole bunch about the concepts in the system, and they just have no idea what this MLA kernel that they're showing us for DeepSeek actually does." "You can go line by line and it's like nope, nope, nope." "But it doesn't matter. The AI understands it, the AI tests it, and you see the results. It produces correct kernels that perform really well." "And I think this is just a sign of what's to come again." "That actual code is not necessarily something that a human has to reason about deeply, if the AI knows how to manipulate the data movement and the processing elements on the hardware that you've given it." ________ More takeaways from OpenAI's Jalapeno development:

Fireside Alpha

4,513,801 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

VIDEO | Here's what senior advocate Sanjay Hegde said on Places of Worship Act, 1991. "With the Ram Temple movement, the structure at Ayodhya came into question. At that point of time, before December 6, 1992 happened, Parliament said, 'look, these questions can keep coming but as a country, we take a call and whatever was the status of any religious structure as on the day of our Independence - August 15, 1947, it will be preserved as it is. Whatever be the character, it will not be changed. The only exception made was for the Ayodhya dispute which was then already pending in the courts. This was passed by Parliament, and it continues to be the law even today, it has not been repealed by Parliament." #AjmerSharif #PlacesOfWorshipAct (Full video available on PTI Videos -
2:05

VIDEO | Here's what senior advocate Sanjay Hegde said on Places of Worship Act, 1991. "With the Ram Temple movement, the structure at Ayodhya came into question. At that point of time, before December 6, 1992 happened, Parliament said, 'look, these questions can keep coming but as a country, we take a call and whatever was the status of any religious structure as on the day of our Independence - August 15, 1947, it will be preserved as it is. Whatever be the character, it will not be changed. The only exception made was for the Ayodhya dispute which was then already pending in the courts. This was passed by Parliament, and it continues to be the law even today, it has not been repealed by Parliament." #AjmerSharif #PlacesOfWorshipAct (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

31,905 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨IT HAPPENED UNDER OBAMA! “When Obama was deporting everybody, there was no cameras, there was no paid protesters, there wasn't everybody there with a video saying, "Look how bad it was," but the same shit was happening. Obama gave Tom Homan, the director of the deportations, a presidential award. Now, Tom Homan is Trump's director of ICE. He's now the villain. Why is there a different perspective on it? It's because the lens of the people watching it has changed, and so now Trump is trying to get control of the borders, get dangerous illegals out of the country, because your nation has to have borders. But because people hate him so much, and because people in the media hate him so much, they're creating the narrative. They're affecting the polls by going out and filming what was happening on.. under Obama, and but now they're actually stirring up the tension level. They're actually creating an issue, and what we're seeing with ICE and Minnesota at the moment is some groups are being very effective at pointing the camera at something that happened in the past and then creating the narrative. We'll see who wins in the end, because I think most Americans want to have control of their borders. But what Trump is coming up against are thousands and thousands of people, some paid, with phones, who are intent on making ICE look like villains, even though they're doing the exact same thing they did under Obama, and they didn't have a problem with it back then.
1:13

🚨IT HAPPENED UNDER OBAMA! “When Obama was deporting everybody, there was no cameras, there was no paid protesters, there wasn't everybody there with a video saying, "Look how bad it was," but the same shit was happening. Obama gave Tom Homan, the director of the deportations, a presidential award. Now, Tom Homan is Trump's director of ICE. He's now the villain. Why is there a different perspective on it? It's because the lens of the people watching it has changed, and so now Trump is trying to get control of the borders, get dangerous illegals out of the country, because your nation has to have borders. But because people hate him so much, and because people in the media hate him so much, they're creating the narrative. They're affecting the polls by going out and filming what was happening on.. under Obama, and but now they're actually stirring up the tension level. They're actually creating an issue, and what we're seeing with ICE and Minnesota at the moment is some groups are being very effective at pointing the camera at something that happened in the past and then creating the narrative. We'll see who wins in the end, because I think most Americans want to have control of their borders. But what Trump is coming up against are thousands and thousands of people, some paid, with phones, who are intent on making ICE look like villains, even though they're doing the exact same thing they did under Obama, and they didn't have a problem with it back then.

Gunther Eagleman™

41,961 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

MUST SEE: Musician and activist Roger Waters questions Russian ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy about why Russia didn't veto the US's resolution at the UN Security Council in November endorsing the so-called “Board of Peace.” “No matter what we think, no matter what we do, we can't be more Palestinian and more Arab than Arabs themselves,” Polyanskiy says. “It’s their region.” “Palestinians were asking us not to veto this resolution... Palestinians who work in the UN. And they represent—they are supposed to represent their country. The whole Arab group, the Palestinian, Islamic group, by the way, was also asking us not to veto this resolution...” “[Palestinian Ambassador Riyad Mansour] said this is the first [step]... this is the first step, he said. ‘Let’s try it, let’s put it in motion, and then we’ll see how it develops.’...” “The golden rule is to listen to the region. And of course when Palestinians asked us not to veto it, what could we do? We had to abstain...” This is original, unedited audio from a podcast recorded last month (details below). Video and subtitles by Decensored News. 🧵 1/
4:47

MUST SEE: Musician and activist Roger Waters questions Russian ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy about why Russia didn't veto the US's resolution at the UN Security Council in November endorsing the so-called “Board of Peace.” “No matter what we think, no matter what we do, we can't be more Palestinian and more Arab than Arabs themselves,” Polyanskiy says. “It’s their region.” “Palestinians were asking us not to veto this resolution... Palestinians who work in the UN. And they represent—they are supposed to represent their country. The whole Arab group, the Palestinian, Islamic group, by the way, was also asking us not to veto this resolution...” “[Palestinian Ambassador Riyad Mansour] said this is the first [step]... this is the first step, he said. ‘Let’s try it, let’s put it in motion, and then we’ll see how it develops.’...” “The golden rule is to listen to the region. And of course when Palestinians asked us not to veto it, what could we do? We had to abstain...” This is original, unedited audio from a podcast recorded last month (details below). Video and subtitles by Decensored News. 🧵 1/

Decensored News

101,181 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Polymarket vs Sportsbooks: Why Betting Apps are Toast On E248, Chamath and Friedberg discussed why prediction markets like Polymarket are killing traditional sportsbooks. Friedberg: “I think gambling generally, as we call it, should be decriminalized.” “And I don't like this state-by-state set up with gambling.” “I think we should have a federal regulatory body.” “This is not going away. People love to bet on stuff. This is part of sports, this is part of the culture.” Chamath: “ Look at Polymarket.” “Polymarket raised at, whatever it was, $1-2B at $9B. Then the next weekend they announced sports betting and now they're raising money 30 days later at, allegedly, $12-15B.” “And you can see, by the way, the way that DraftKings and FanDuel stock have reacted to this, those companies are toast.” Friedberg: “ The Polymarket model is the best model because it creates a market.” “And so as information flows in, that market will dynamically adjust and everyone will get a more fair price.” “Polymarket actually has the news before the news does.” “And this is one of the most powerful outputs of Polymarket, is they're actually getting a read on what's going on in the world before the media recognizes it, before the public recognizes it.” “When you put money up, it actually turns out that when people have incentives, that market will find the truth.”
1:04

Polymarket vs Sportsbooks: Why Betting Apps are Toast On E248, Chamath and Friedberg discussed why prediction markets like Polymarket are killing traditional sportsbooks. Friedberg: “I think gambling generally, as we call it, should be decriminalized.” “And I don't like this state-by-state set up with gambling.” “I think we should have a federal regulatory body.” “This is not going away. People love to bet on stuff. This is part of sports, this is part of the culture.” Chamath: “ Look at Polymarket.” “Polymarket raised at, whatever it was, $1-2B at $9B. Then the next weekend they announced sports betting and now they're raising money 30 days later at, allegedly, $12-15B.” “And you can see, by the way, the way that DraftKings and FanDuel stock have reacted to this, those companies are toast.” Friedberg: “ The Polymarket model is the best model because it creates a market.” “And so as information flows in, that market will dynamically adjust and everyone will get a more fair price.” “Polymarket actually has the news before the news does.” “And this is one of the most powerful outputs of Polymarket, is they're actually getting a read on what's going on in the world before the media recognizes it, before the public recognizes it.” “When you put money up, it actually turns out that when people have incentives, that market will find the truth.”

The All-In Podcast

348,251 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

#WATCH | On Kash Patel to be sworn in as the Director of FBI, US President Donald Trump says, "... One of the reasons I love Kash (Patel) and wanted to put him in is because of the respect the agents had for him. He will go down as the best ever at that position. Turned out he was very easy to get approved. He is a tough and strong guy. He has his opinions... Trey Gowdy came out with an incredible statement and said that Kash is an incredible person and people don't realise it. When he said that, there was no doubt left. It was a big statement made by someone who is respected and is on the moderate side..." Source: US Network Pool via Reuters
1:22

#WATCH | On Kash Patel to be sworn in as the Director of FBI, US President Donald Trump says, "... One of the reasons I love Kash (Patel) and wanted to put him in is because of the respect the agents had for him. He will go down as the best ever at that position. Turned out he was very easy to get approved. He is a tough and strong guy. He has his opinions... Trey Gowdy came out with an incredible statement and said that Kash is an incredible person and people don't realise it. When he said that, there was no doubt left. It was a big statement made by someone who is respected and is on the moderate side..." Source: US Network Pool via Reuters

ANI

60,072 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I PREDICTED SOMETHING WOULD HAPPEN TO CHARLIE 2 MONTHS AGO. Many of us saw the writing on the wall and as all of this has been coming out… And This is EXACTLY why many of us are so loud about it now and trying to figure this out… But, with everything that’s happened, it made me go back and watch the live stream I did covering the debate that Charlie hosted at TPUSA with Dave Smith & Josh Hammer…. This is what I said in the first 5 mins of the stream. The rest is available and you can watch it as it is VERY interesting given everything that has happened. Pay close attention to demeanor, mannerisms of a certain individual, the “curiosity” that was so present and the overall message that was put on the main stage at that event… What was said on that stage was VERY dangerous. When you study and understand the past, it gives you the ability to understand the present much better than most and sometimes… it also gives you the ability to predict the future. But the truth is no one really knows what happened and at the end of the day… I’m just a conspiracy theorist.
3:57

I PREDICTED SOMETHING WOULD HAPPEN TO CHARLIE 2 MONTHS AGO. Many of us saw the writing on the wall and as all of this has been coming out… And This is EXACTLY why many of us are so loud about it now and trying to figure this out… But, with everything that’s happened, it made me go back and watch the live stream I did covering the debate that Charlie hosted at TPUSA with Dave Smith & Josh Hammer…. This is what I said in the first 5 mins of the stream. The rest is available and you can watch it as it is VERY interesting given everything that has happened. Pay close attention to demeanor, mannerisms of a certain individual, the “curiosity” that was so present and the overall message that was put on the main stage at that event… What was said on that stage was VERY dangerous. When you study and understand the past, it gives you the ability to understand the present much better than most and sometimes… it also gives you the ability to predict the future. But the truth is no one really knows what happened and at the end of the day… I’m just a conspiracy theorist.

Ian

67,537 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Reporter: “There was a briefing on Capitol Hill today, and some senators came out and said they were more convinced than ever that there would be U.S. boots on the ground. Senator Blumenthal said that, in fact. Your reaction to that and any update on President Trump’s thinking about it?” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt: “I would say that Democrats on Capitol Hill are clearly being quite disingenuous. Three years ago, not a single Democrat voted for the — against the resolution condemning Iran as the world’s leading state sponsor of terror. Yet now, with President Trump as commander in chief finally taking the action that so many Democrats have called on the commander in chief to do for many, many years to wipe out the threat of a rogue Iranian terrorist regime.” “Now, all of a sudden, Democrats are playing politics with this longstanding bipartisan policy of the United States. And they 53 of them in the House, recently voted against the resolution condemning Iran as the world’s state sponsor of terror.” “So, I wouldn’t take Democrats at their word. As for boots on the ground, the President has talked about this repeatedly. Wisely, he does not rule options out as commander in chief. So again, I would hesitate to confirm anything that a Democrat on Capitol Hill says right now about the President’s thinking.”
1:11

Reporter: “There was a briefing on Capitol Hill today, and some senators came out and said they were more convinced than ever that there would be U.S. boots on the ground. Senator Blumenthal said that, in fact. Your reaction to that and any update on President Trump’s thinking about it?” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt: “I would say that Democrats on Capitol Hill are clearly being quite disingenuous. Three years ago, not a single Democrat voted for the — against the resolution condemning Iran as the world’s leading state sponsor of terror. Yet now, with President Trump as commander in chief finally taking the action that so many Democrats have called on the commander in chief to do for many, many years to wipe out the threat of a rogue Iranian terrorist regime.” “Now, all of a sudden, Democrats are playing politics with this longstanding bipartisan policy of the United States. And they 53 of them in the House, recently voted against the resolution condemning Iran as the world’s state sponsor of terror.” “So, I wouldn’t take Democrats at their word. As for boots on the ground, the President has talked about this repeatedly. Wisely, he does not rule options out as commander in chief. So again, I would hesitate to confirm anything that a Democrat on Capitol Hill says right now about the President’s thinking.”

RedWave Press

108,261 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

This is quite crazy. According to former Assistant Secretary of Defense Chas Freeman (one of the rare senior US officials that I admire), the Trump administration couldn't even explain to the Japanese negotiating team what they were looking to achieve with the tariffs. Here's what Freeman said: "The Japanese have just been in Washington. Their experience apparently was they went to talk to the American leadership on this matter, and the American leadership said 'what are you offering?' And the Japanese said 'well, what is it that you want?' And the Americans could not explain what they wanted." Freeman also noted, correctly, that "the United States [broke] virtually every agreement it has agreed to in recent decades including the replacement for NAFTA with proposed tariffs on Canada and Mexico that was negotiated by Mr. Trump in his first term." Which doesn't exactly encourage countries to make a deal with Trump: what's the point? Which is why Freeman believes that China won't go for negotiations and has instead decided to "wait [America] out". As he puts it: "What is [China's] incentive to negotiate with the US when the US has no stated objectives that make sense and no record of compliance with its own agreements? I think the Chinese have decided they will wait us out and see how Americans like Walmart and Amazon denuded of products." Fundamentally and somewhat paradoxically, that's the thing Trump the self-anointed "dealmaker" obviously doesn't get: at the end of the day dealmaking is built on credibility and consistency, and America has now neither.
1:41

This is quite crazy. According to former Assistant Secretary of Defense Chas Freeman (one of the rare senior US officials that I admire), the Trump administration couldn't even explain to the Japanese negotiating team what they were looking to achieve with the tariffs. Here's what Freeman said: "The Japanese have just been in Washington. Their experience apparently was they went to talk to the American leadership on this matter, and the American leadership said 'what are you offering?' And the Japanese said 'well, what is it that you want?' And the Americans could not explain what they wanted." Freeman also noted, correctly, that "the United States [broke] virtually every agreement it has agreed to in recent decades including the replacement for NAFTA with proposed tariffs on Canada and Mexico that was negotiated by Mr. Trump in his first term." Which doesn't exactly encourage countries to make a deal with Trump: what's the point? Which is why Freeman believes that China won't go for negotiations and has instead decided to "wait [America] out". As he puts it: "What is [China's] incentive to negotiate with the US when the US has no stated objectives that make sense and no record of compliance with its own agreements? I think the Chinese have decided they will wait us out and see how Americans like Walmart and Amazon denuded of products." Fundamentally and somewhat paradoxically, that's the thing Trump the self-anointed "dealmaker" obviously doesn't get: at the end of the day dealmaking is built on credibility and consistency, and America has now neither.

Arnaud Bertrand

2,243,710 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

.JD Vance explained some details of the deal to CBS. Many people are misrepresenting it maliciously, so let's clear some things up. NO the US will not pay Iran $300B IF Iran gives up all its nuke stuff then a fund for investment & reconstruction w/ Gulf & other $$$ is proposed. NO there is no agreement to unfreeze $24B now or at any point. IF Iran honors its commitments it will get sanctions relief. YES the US will be directly involved in verifying the nuclear material and program are destroyed. We may not be the ones who do the destruction but we will witness it and be part of inspections to ensure it is not reconstituted. There is no reason for all the caterwauling about reconstruction in Iran. Any deal was going to involve that and any money going in will be monitores. Of course the regime will steal some and we will be watching to ensure it doesn't get used for malign purposes. It's sad to watch so many people actively hoping this deal won't work and lying about what it comprises. As described this deal is a major victory for the US, the region and the world. If they follow through it could also be a return of Iran to the community of nations. If the regime doesn't abide by the deal they have made. Their days are certainly numbered. But this offers a real chance to secure the region and aim it toward prosperity.
2:21

.JD Vance explained some details of the deal to CBS. Many people are misrepresenting it maliciously, so let's clear some things up. NO the US will not pay Iran $300B IF Iran gives up all its nuke stuff then a fund for investment & reconstruction w/ Gulf & other $$$ is proposed. NO there is no agreement to unfreeze $24B now or at any point. IF Iran honors its commitments it will get sanctions relief. YES the US will be directly involved in verifying the nuclear material and program are destroyed. We may not be the ones who do the destruction but we will witness it and be part of inspections to ensure it is not reconstituted. There is no reason for all the caterwauling about reconstruction in Iran. Any deal was going to involve that and any money going in will be monitores. Of course the regime will steal some and we will be watching to ensure it doesn't get used for malign purposes. It's sad to watch so many people actively hoping this deal won't work and lying about what it comprises. As described this deal is a major victory for the US, the region and the world. If they follow through it could also be a return of Iran to the community of nations. If the regime doesn't abide by the deal they have made. Their days are certainly numbered. But this offers a real chance to secure the region and aim it toward prosperity.

Jim Hanson

85,231 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

"I have no reason to think this is the bottom. I think by the end of Q3 we've definitely hit the bottom and are turning back around. The idea that the four year cycle was dead is overstated" Alex Miller on how he's viewing the market "I don't really care what the market does in the next six months. It doesn't affect what I do because I learned long ago that I do not know how to time the market. I'm not an active trader" "I have no reason to think this is the bottom. I don't buy into the argument that there's some structural thing going on right now that makes the 65, 58 we had last week, the 64 we're at now, the bottom of the market. Macro things can happen"
0:59

"I have no reason to think this is the bottom. I think by the end of Q3 we've definitely hit the bottom and are turning back around. The idea that the four year cycle was dead is overstated" Alex Miller on how he's viewing the market "I don't really care what the market does in the next six months. It doesn't affect what I do because I learned long ago that I do not know how to time the market. I'm not an active trader" "I have no reason to think this is the bottom. I don't buy into the argument that there's some structural thing going on right now that makes the 65, 58 we had last week, the 64 we're at now, the bottom of the market. Macro things can happen"

The Wolf Of All Streets

33,817 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce