Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🔥Post Debate: 7 Things The Presidential Candidates Should Know | This Week's Economy Ep. 67 🎙️ 👀Watch and subscribe to get show notes here: #txlege #congress #Debate2024 #podcast #letpeopleprosper #economy Kansas Policy Inst. Mackinac Center American Institute for Economic Research Econlib ATR Pelican Institute Texans for Fiscal Responsibility American...

VanceGinn's profile picture

Vance Ginn

17,275 subscribers

1,786,600 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics#txlege#congress#Debate2024#podcast#letpeopleprosper#economy
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🔥 “THE SPLC IS A HATE GROUP” - Charlie Kirk BIG DAY AS THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER IS INDICTED BY THE FBI. Don’t forget the SPLC actually said said “Designating Antifa a Domestic terror group is DANGEROUS & threatens civil liberties” They ever called BEN CARSON & CHARLIE KIRK EXTREMISTS … while engaging in staged hate crime for PAY. Jack Posobiec reads of a LIST OF WHO THE SPLC CONSIDERS RADICAL RIGHT EXTREMISTS: Ben Carson, The Heritage Foundation, Dennis Prager, Prager U, The Federalist Society, Franklin-Graham, Catholic Medical Association, The Alliance to Sending Freedom,Focus on the Family, American Research Council, Religious Liberty Council, Pacific Justice Institute, Leadership Institute, Ruth Institute, Texas Values, Florida Family Policy Council, The Homeschool Legal Defense Assc., Moms for Liberty, Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles, Daily Wire & TURNING POINT AND THEY ARE SITTING ON A BILLION DOLLARS. Get that POVERTY PALACE.
7:30

🔥 “THE SPLC IS A HATE GROUP” - Charlie Kirk BIG DAY AS THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER IS INDICTED BY THE FBI. Don’t forget the SPLC actually said said “Designating Antifa a Domestic terror group is DANGEROUS & threatens civil liberties” They ever called BEN CARSON & CHARLIE KIRK EXTREMISTS … while engaging in staged hate crime for PAY. Jack Posobiec reads of a LIST OF WHO THE SPLC CONSIDERS RADICAL RIGHT EXTREMISTS: Ben Carson, The Heritage Foundation, Dennis Prager, Prager U, The Federalist Society, Franklin-Graham, Catholic Medical Association, The Alliance to Sending Freedom,Focus on the Family, American Research Council, Religious Liberty Council, Pacific Justice Institute, Leadership Institute, Ruth Institute, Texas Values, Florida Family Policy Council, The Homeschool Legal Defense Assc., Moms for Liberty, Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles, Daily Wire & TURNING POINT AND THEY ARE SITTING ON A BILLION DOLLARS. Get that POVERTY PALACE.

Johnny St.Pete

18,724 views • 3 months ago

While Hepatatis A, B, C, D were discovered by the British and the American medical scientists, Hepatatis 'E' was discovered by a Kashmiri gastroenterologist when more than 1,700 people died in a devastating epidemic in the Valley's Tangmarg-Sopore belt in 1978. After 20 years of medical studies, practice, research and service at GMC Srinagar and PGIMER Chandigarh, Professor Mohammad Sultan Khuroo of Sopore joined the Faculty of Medicine at Sher-e-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) Srinagar in 1982. He was among the pioneers who gave life to an imposing massive concrete structure and developed it as the entire northern India's second largest and the most prestigious institute of medical sciences and a deemed university. After serving as Head of the Department of Gastroenterology and Dean Faculty of Medicine, Prof. Khuroo served as Director of SKIMS in his life's most challenging period in 1993-95. For over 10 years he served as a consultant and professor at Saudi Arabia's prestigious King Faisal Hospital and Research Centre where he headed the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and introduced liver transplants before returning to Kashmir where he established a private clinic and research center. Watch him speak in length about his life, struggles and achievements in a 55-minute long "Kashmir Podcast with Ahmed Ali Fayyaz" on TALKISTAN this evening and the week following. Just subscribe to TALKISTAN on YouTube on the following link to watch this and other episodes of the programme:
0:36

While Hepatatis A, B, C, D were discovered by the British and the American medical scientists, Hepatatis 'E' was discovered by a Kashmiri gastroenterologist when more than 1,700 people died in a devastating epidemic in the Valley's Tangmarg-Sopore belt in 1978. After 20 years of medical studies, practice, research and service at GMC Srinagar and PGIMER Chandigarh, Professor Mohammad Sultan Khuroo of Sopore joined the Faculty of Medicine at Sher-e-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) Srinagar in 1982. He was among the pioneers who gave life to an imposing massive concrete structure and developed it as the entire northern India's second largest and the most prestigious institute of medical sciences and a deemed university. After serving as Head of the Department of Gastroenterology and Dean Faculty of Medicine, Prof. Khuroo served as Director of SKIMS in his life's most challenging period in 1993-95. For over 10 years he served as a consultant and professor at Saudi Arabia's prestigious King Faisal Hospital and Research Centre where he headed the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and introduced liver transplants before returning to Kashmir where he established a private clinic and research center. Watch him speak in length about his life, struggles and achievements in a 55-minute long "Kashmir Podcast with Ahmed Ali Fayyaz" on TALKISTAN this evening and the week following. Just subscribe to TALKISTAN on YouTube on the following link to watch this and other episodes of the programme:

Ahmed Ali Fayyaz

15,346 views • 1 year ago

Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine has entered its fifth year. The war is a brutal, bloody stalemate and diplomacy appears deadlocked. Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg was President Donald Trump's special envoy to Ukraine until the end of 2025 and is now the co-chair of American security at the America First Policy Institute. Compass Points host Nick Schifrin sat down with Kellogg for an inside look at the Trump administration's strategy for ending the war, how we got here and what's ahead. “It's sort of like an American poker game. If you go all in, the other side doesn't know, do you really have the cards or not? And I think we do, we the United States, have got the cards to force Putin to say, 'Time for you to go home. Time to call it a day, time to end this war,'” Kellogg said. He added that the Russian leader “is not gonna win this war. I don't think he's got the wherewithal to do so." Compass Points from PBS News analyzes prominent international affairs topics and America’s role in a shifting world, breaking down global conflicts, rising tensions, and their implications for U.S. interests. Visit the PBS News website to watch this week's episode.
1:51

Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine has entered its fifth year. The war is a brutal, bloody stalemate and diplomacy appears deadlocked. Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg was President Donald Trump's special envoy to Ukraine until the end of 2025 and is now the co-chair of American security at the America First Policy Institute. Compass Points host Nick Schifrin sat down with Kellogg for an inside look at the Trump administration's strategy for ending the war, how we got here and what's ahead. “It's sort of like an American poker game. If you go all in, the other side doesn't know, do you really have the cards or not? And I think we do, we the United States, have got the cards to force Putin to say, 'Time for you to go home. Time to call it a day, time to end this war,'” Kellogg said. He added that the Russian leader “is not gonna win this war. I don't think he's got the wherewithal to do so." Compass Points from PBS News analyzes prominent international affairs topics and America’s role in a shifting world, breaking down global conflicts, rising tensions, and their implications for U.S. interests. Visit the PBS News website to watch this week's episode.

PBS News

13,412 views • 5 months ago

“Almost every single top Chinese biomedical research scientist of note was funded in some part by the NIH. Many were trained in the United States,” NIH director Jay Bhattacharya told me during our recent interview. He says the NIH is now overhauling how it handles foreign research collaborations. The old “sub-award” system—where U.S. institutions funneled money to foreign labs—led to major oversight problems, Bhattacharya says. Under that structure, the U.S. partner was responsible for auditing the foreign collaborator, not the NIH itself. “In the case of Wuhan…EcoHealth Alliance had a sub-award relationship with this Wuhan Institute of Virology, and when all of the pandemic happened…EcoHealth Alliance essentially delayed reporting…and then ultimately said: ‘Oh, well, we don't control Wuhan Institute of Virology. We can't get the lab notebooks.’ That is an unacceptable structure.” “If American taxpayer dollars are going to go to some foreign institution, then we should be confident that we, the Americans, have an auditing relationship that allows us to get access to the kinds of things that we normally have access to for a domestic institution that we fund,” he says. As one of his first decisions as NIH Director, Bhattacharya created a new system that gives the NIH direct oversight of both U.S. and foreign collaborators. This change means the agency can cut off funding if a partner refuses to cooperate. He also introduced two new requirements for any foreign collaboration: – Researchers must show the project would be much more expensive to run in the U.S. – They must show the knowledge gained will directly benefit Americans. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD NIH
5:59

“Almost every single top Chinese biomedical research scientist of note was funded in some part by the NIH. Many were trained in the United States,” NIH director Jay Bhattacharya told me during our recent interview. He says the NIH is now overhauling how it handles foreign research collaborations. The old “sub-award” system—where U.S. institutions funneled money to foreign labs—led to major oversight problems, Bhattacharya says. Under that structure, the U.S. partner was responsible for auditing the foreign collaborator, not the NIH itself. “In the case of Wuhan…EcoHealth Alliance had a sub-award relationship with this Wuhan Institute of Virology, and when all of the pandemic happened…EcoHealth Alliance essentially delayed reporting…and then ultimately said: ‘Oh, well, we don't control Wuhan Institute of Virology. We can't get the lab notebooks.’ That is an unacceptable structure.” “If American taxpayer dollars are going to go to some foreign institution, then we should be confident that we, the Americans, have an auditing relationship that allows us to get access to the kinds of things that we normally have access to for a domestic institution that we fund,” he says. As one of his first decisions as NIH Director, Bhattacharya created a new system that gives the NIH direct oversight of both U.S. and foreign collaborators. This change means the agency can cut off funding if a partner refuses to cooperate. He also introduced two new requirements for any foreign collaboration: – Researchers must show the project would be much more expensive to run in the U.S. – They must show the knowledge gained will directly benefit Americans. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD NIH

Jan Jekielek

12,738 views • 5 months ago

David Sacks explains exactly how Dr. Anthony Fauci orchestrated the pandemic and knowingly lied to the American public to protect his own a**. If there is one thing you watch today, this is it. During the The All-In Podcast, Sacks explains how Fauci purposely misled the American public to protect himself. "They knew right away that [Cov*d] came from a lab leak and Fauci and Collins said in emails that they were gonna begin a brutal takedown in order to conceal this fundamental truth of the lab leak from the public." "Now, why would Fauci need to conceal this? Because he had funded gain of function research programs... to conduct gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology." "Fauci was personally responsible for reversing an Obama-era decision to prohibit gain of function research because it was so risky." "[Fauci] funded a gain of function research. He was personally responsible for lifting the ban on gain of function research." "He had a lot of reasons to wanna hide the fact that COVID was engineered in a lab and was lab leak." "Longtime colleague of Fauci and Collins at NIH. Dr. David Morens developed a strategy for evading FOIA requests that would expose the truth." "He did this by deleting government emails, which is a crime by using private email to conduct government business, which is also a crime." "And then strategically misspelling names and titles to frustrate the FOIA searches." To recap: - Fauci aggressively pursued gain-of-function research and was responsible for funding the Wuhan lab while others warned of the dangers. - The virus then leaked from this lab, leading to trillions of dollars in debt which will paralyze our economy for decades into the future, death, su*cides, etc. - Fauci and others were paraded around as heroes. - Trump was ridiculed for pushing the lab leak theory. - Instead of admitting to the lab leak, Fauci and other doctors did all they could to cover it up. - To top it off, many scientists accepted millions of dollars in royalties from the vaccine. You should be furious.
3:16

David Sacks explains exactly how Dr. Anthony Fauci orchestrated the pandemic and knowingly lied to the American public to protect his own a**. If there is one thing you watch today, this is it. During the The All-In Podcast, Sacks explains how Fauci purposely misled the American public to protect himself. "They knew right away that [Cov*d] came from a lab leak and Fauci and Collins said in emails that they were gonna begin a brutal takedown in order to conceal this fundamental truth of the lab leak from the public." "Now, why would Fauci need to conceal this? Because he had funded gain of function research programs... to conduct gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology." "Fauci was personally responsible for reversing an Obama-era decision to prohibit gain of function research because it was so risky." "[Fauci] funded a gain of function research. He was personally responsible for lifting the ban on gain of function research." "He had a lot of reasons to wanna hide the fact that COVID was engineered in a lab and was lab leak." "Longtime colleague of Fauci and Collins at NIH. Dr. David Morens developed a strategy for evading FOIA requests that would expose the truth." "He did this by deleting government emails, which is a crime by using private email to conduct government business, which is also a crime." "And then strategically misspelling names and titles to frustrate the FOIA searches." To recap: - Fauci aggressively pursued gain-of-function research and was responsible for funding the Wuhan lab while others warned of the dangers. - The virus then leaked from this lab, leading to trillions of dollars in debt which will paralyze our economy for decades into the future, death, su*cides, etc. - Fauci and others were paraded around as heroes. - Trump was ridiculed for pushing the lab leak theory. - Instead of admitting to the lab leak, Fauci and other doctors did all they could to cover it up. - To top it off, many scientists accepted millions of dollars in royalties from the vaccine. You should be furious.

Collin Rugg

1,867,755 views • 2 years ago

🚨Sen. Rand Paul details one of MANY lies Anthony Fauci told the public: "On May 11, 2021, you told the Senate the NIH has never, ever, and does not now fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. When I gave you the opportunity to correct the record to reconsider the statement, you responded that you had never before lied to Congress. We were then told that only the government's narrowest regulation of definition counted here. That you could define gain-of-function in one way in which this was not gain-of-function, in which all of the common sense of the world be thrown out [...] But the real question is, was it dangerous? Was it a wise decision to fund this? And you haven't deviated from that. You've never admitted that it could have been a mistake, running this research in China. The American people were not asking for a semantics debate over what is gain-of-function. They were asking, does common sense say this research was dangerous in Wuhan? They wanted to know whether their money funded experiments in Wuhan that made bad coronavirus' better able to infect humans. The answer is, yes."
1:22

🚨Sen. Rand Paul details one of MANY lies Anthony Fauci told the public: "On May 11, 2021, you told the Senate the NIH has never, ever, and does not now fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. When I gave you the opportunity to correct the record to reconsider the statement, you responded that you had never before lied to Congress. We were then told that only the government's narrowest regulation of definition counted here. That you could define gain-of-function in one way in which this was not gain-of-function, in which all of the common sense of the world be thrown out [...] But the real question is, was it dangerous? Was it a wise decision to fund this? And you haven't deviated from that. You've never admitted that it could have been a mistake, running this research in China. The American people were not asking for a semantics debate over what is gain-of-function. They were asking, does common sense say this research was dangerous in Wuhan? They wanted to know whether their money funded experiments in Wuhan that made bad coronavirus' better able to infect humans. The answer is, yes."

Townhall.com

28,282 views • 10 days ago

The day after the United States and Israel began the war with Iran, President Donald Trump said the strikes would last four to five weeks. Now, as the war begins its fourth week, it appears there is no end in sight. Iran's regime is severely weakened, but is still retaliating against Israel and its Gulf neighbors. The Strait of Hormuz is largely closed, leaving oil prices spiking. Trump's top counterterrorism official resigned in protest to the war. In an escalation of the war, Israel struck Iran’s South Pars gas field this week, prompting Iran to retaliate by attacking energy infrastructure for neighboring countries in the region. The South Pars field in the Persian Gulf is Iran’s biggest source of domestic energy and the largest gas field in the world. Following the strike, Trump said in a Truth Social post Wednesday night that Israel acted alone and that “the United States knew nothing about this particular attack.” Michael Doran, who served on President George W. Bush's National Security Council staff, doubts the president's message. “Of course he knew about it,” Doran, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, told host Nick Schifrin. “He's saying he didn't know about in order to protect his escalation option.” Dana Stroll, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East during the Biden administration, shared that she had a different view. “I think that Trump had to back down,” Stroll, who is now the director of research at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said. “The U.S. and Israeli military operations are so joint at this point, there's no way in which that South Pars Israeli strike would have happened without the U.S. military knowing.” “Why did he back down so fast? I think because he wasn't prepared for how fast the Iranians escalated,” Stroll added. Compass Points from PBS News analyzes prominent international affairs topics and America’s role in a shifting world, breaking down global conflicts, rising tensions, and their implications for U.S. interests. Visit the PBS News website to watch this week's episode.
2:35

The day after the United States and Israel began the war with Iran, President Donald Trump said the strikes would last four to five weeks. Now, as the war begins its fourth week, it appears there is no end in sight. Iran's regime is severely weakened, but is still retaliating against Israel and its Gulf neighbors. The Strait of Hormuz is largely closed, leaving oil prices spiking. Trump's top counterterrorism official resigned in protest to the war. In an escalation of the war, Israel struck Iran’s South Pars gas field this week, prompting Iran to retaliate by attacking energy infrastructure for neighboring countries in the region. The South Pars field in the Persian Gulf is Iran’s biggest source of domestic energy and the largest gas field in the world. Following the strike, Trump said in a Truth Social post Wednesday night that Israel acted alone and that “the United States knew nothing about this particular attack.” Michael Doran, who served on President George W. Bush's National Security Council staff, doubts the president's message. “Of course he knew about it,” Doran, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, told host Nick Schifrin. “He's saying he didn't know about in order to protect his escalation option.” Dana Stroll, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East during the Biden administration, shared that she had a different view. “I think that Trump had to back down,” Stroll, who is now the director of research at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said. “The U.S. and Israeli military operations are so joint at this point, there's no way in which that South Pars Israeli strike would have happened without the U.S. military knowing.” “Why did he back down so fast? I think because he wasn't prepared for how fast the Iranians escalated,” Stroll added. Compass Points from PBS News analyzes prominent international affairs topics and America’s role in a shifting world, breaking down global conflicts, rising tensions, and their implications for U.S. interests. Visit the PBS News website to watch this week's episode.

PBS News

14,757 views • 4 months ago

Reposting because the AEC requires authorisation... "AEC rules Abbie Chatfield does not need authorisation for podcast, but cross-posting rules unclear" - There are rules for some but not others. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• It’s time governments stopped lying about renewable energy. “The federal government’s wind farm subsidies are enriching foreign corporates and leaving Australians worse off, all in an effort to prop up unreliable and inefficient renewable energy projects,” said Mia Schlicht, Research Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs. Today, the IPA released new research detailing how the federal government’s Large-scale Renewable Energy Target (LRET) guarantees a river of gold for predominantly foreign owned wind farms and how the cost is transferred to electricity consumers. The research found: In 2024, through the LRET subsidy scheme, a total of $1.04 billion was paid by electricity consumers to the 50 largest wind farms operating in Australia. 35 of Australia’s 50 largest wind farms, 70 per cent, are entirely or partially foreign owned. Australian energy consumers were forced to pay $689 million to foreign owned wind farms. “In the middle of a cost-of-living crisis, the federal government is forcing Australian electricity consumers to hand over $1 billion through hidden charges on their power bills to largely foreign owned companies, all in the name of net zero,” said Ms Schlicht. “How can the Prime Minister, having broken his promise to cut household power bills, justify sending over $689 million to foreign companies when mainstream Australians cannot afford their power bills?” To meet economy wrecking emissions reduction targets, the federal government forces electricity retailers to purchase large-scale generation certificates from renewable energy producers. This artificially inflates the demand for renewables, with added costs passed on to consumers.” One of the biggest subsides that renewables get is the renewable energy target that forces energy retailers to buy renewable energy or they get penalised. This forces demand for renewables up in the short window that the sun is shining which increases the price of energy via your power bill. This scheme isn’t well understood but it should be, because if people knew how much it was increasing their power bills and that the money was going offshore they would be up in arms. People First will continue to lobby for the removal of the RET as it is unacceptable the energy prices are being forced up because of it. Quote from:
0:41

Reposting because the AEC requires authorisation... "AEC rules Abbie Chatfield does not need authorisation for podcast, but cross-posting rules unclear" - There are rules for some but not others. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• It’s time governments stopped lying about renewable energy. “The federal government’s wind farm subsidies are enriching foreign corporates and leaving Australians worse off, all in an effort to prop up unreliable and inefficient renewable energy projects,” said Mia Schlicht, Research Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs. Today, the IPA released new research detailing how the federal government’s Large-scale Renewable Energy Target (LRET) guarantees a river of gold for predominantly foreign owned wind farms and how the cost is transferred to electricity consumers. The research found: In 2024, through the LRET subsidy scheme, a total of $1.04 billion was paid by electricity consumers to the 50 largest wind farms operating in Australia. 35 of Australia’s 50 largest wind farms, 70 per cent, are entirely or partially foreign owned. Australian energy consumers were forced to pay $689 million to foreign owned wind farms. “In the middle of a cost-of-living crisis, the federal government is forcing Australian electricity consumers to hand over $1 billion through hidden charges on their power bills to largely foreign owned companies, all in the name of net zero,” said Ms Schlicht. “How can the Prime Minister, having broken his promise to cut household power bills, justify sending over $689 million to foreign companies when mainstream Australians cannot afford their power bills?” To meet economy wrecking emissions reduction targets, the federal government forces electricity retailers to purchase large-scale generation certificates from renewable energy producers. This artificially inflates the demand for renewables, with added costs passed on to consumers.” One of the biggest subsides that renewables get is the renewable energy target that forces energy retailers to buy renewable energy or they get penalised. This forces demand for renewables up in the short window that the sun is shining which increases the price of energy via your power bill. This scheme isn’t well understood but it should be, because if people knew how much it was increasing their power bills and that the money was going offshore they would be up in arms. People First will continue to lobby for the removal of the RET as it is unacceptable the energy prices are being forced up because of it. Quote from:

Gerard Rennick

30,562 views • 1 year ago

MIT announces the Initiative for New Manufacturing | Peter Dizikes, MIT News The Institute-wide effort aims to bolster industry and create jobs by driving innovation across vital manufacturing sectors. MIT today launched its Initiative for New Manufacturing (INM), an Institute-wide effort to reinfuse U.S. industrial production with leading-edge technologies, bolster crucial U.S. economic sectors, and ignite job creation. The initiative will encompass advanced research, innovative education programs, and partnership with companies across many sectors, in a bid to help transform manufacturing and elevate its impact. “We want to work with firms big and small, in cities, small towns and everywhere in between, to help them adopt new approaches for increased productivity,” MIT President Sally A. Kornbluth wrote in a letter to the Institute community this morning. “We want to deliberately design high-quality, human-centered manufacturing jobs that bring new life to communities across the country.” Kornbluth added: “Helping America build a future of new manufacturing is a perfect job for MIT — and I’m convinced that there is no more important work we can do to meet the moment and serve the nation now.” The Initiative for New Manufacturing also announced its first six founding industry consortium members: Amgen, Flex, GE Vernova, PTC, Sanofi, and Siemens. Participants in the INM Industry Consortium will support seed projects proposed by MIT researchers, initially in the area of artificial intelligence for manufacturing. INM joins the ranks of MIT’s other presidential initiatives — including The Climate Project at MIT; MITHIC, which supports the human-centered disciplines; MIT HEALS, centered on the life sciences and health; and MGAIC, the MIT Generative AI Impact Consortium. “There is tremendous opportunity to bring together a vibrant community working across every scale — from nanotechnology to large-scale manufacturing — and across a wide-range of applications including semiconductors, medical devices, automotive, energy systems, and biotechnology,” says Anantha Chandrakasan, MIT’s chief innovation and strategy officer and dean of engineering, who is part of the initiative’s leadership team. “MIT is uniquely positioned to harness the transformative power of digital tools and AI to shape future of manufacturing. I’m truly excited about what we can build together and the synergies this creates with other cross-cutting initiatives across the Institute.” The initiative is just the latest MIT-centered effort in recent decades aiming to expand American manufacturing. A faculty research group wrote the 1989 bestseller “Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge,” advocating for a renewal of manufacturing; another MIT project, called Production in the Innovation Economy, called for expanded manufacturing in the early 2010s. In 2016, MIT also founded The Engine, a venture fund investing in hardware-based “tough tech” start-ups including many with potential to became substantial manufacturing firms. As developed, the MIT Initiative for New Manufacturing is based around four major themes: - Reimagining manufacturing technologies and systems: realizing breakthrough technologies and system-level approaches to advance energy production, health care, computing, transportation, consumer products, and more; - Elevating the productivity and experience of manufacturing: developing and deploying new digitally driven methods and tools to amplify productivity and improve the human experience of manufacturing; - Scaling new manufacturing: accelerating the scaling of manufacturing companies and transforming supply chains to maximize efficiency and resilience, fostering product innovation and business growth; and - Transforming the manufacturing base: driving the deployment of a sustainable global manufacturing ecosystem that provides compelling opportunities to workers, with major efforts focused on the U.S. The initiative has mapped out many concrete activities and programs, which will include an Institute-wide research program on emerging technologies and other major topics; workforce and education programs; and industry engagement and participation. INM also aims to establish new labs for developing manufacturing tools and techniques; a “factory observatory” program which immerses students in manufacturing through visits to production sites; and key “pillars” focusing on areas from semiconductors and biomanufacturing to defense and aviation. The workforce and education element of INM will include TechAMP, an MIT-created program that works with community colleges to bridge the gap between technicians and engineers; AI-driven teaching tools; professional education; and an effort to expand manufacturing education on campus in collaboration with MIT departments and degree programs. INM’s leadership team has three faculty co-directors: John Hart, the Class of 1922 Professor and head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering; Suzanne Berger, Institute Professor at MIT and a political scientist who has conducted influential empirical studies of manufacturing; and Chris Love, the Raymond A. and Helen E. St. Laurent Professor of Chemical Engineering. The initiative’s executive director is Julie Diop. The initiative is in the process of forming a faculty steering committee with representation from across the Institute, as well as an external advisory board. INM stems partly from the work of the Manufacturing@MIT working group, formed in 2022 to assess many of these issues. The launch of the new initiative was previewed at a daylong MIT symposium on May 7, titled “A Vision for New Manufacturing.” The event, held before a capacity audience in MIT’s Wong Auditorium, featured over 30 speakers from a wide range of manufacturing sectors. “The rationale for growing and transforming U.S. manufacturing has never been more urgent than it is today,” Berger said at the event. “What we are trying to build at MIT now is not just another research project. … Together, with people in this room and outside this room, we’re trying to change what’s happening in our country.” “We need to think about the importance of manufacturing again, because it is what brings product ideas to people,” Love told MIT News. “For instance, in biotechnology, new life-saving medicines can’t reach patients without manufacturing. There is a real urgency about this issue for both economic prosperity and creating jobs. We have seen the impact for our country when we have lost our lead in manufacturing in some sectors. Biotechnology, where the U.S. has been the global leader for more than 40 years, offers the potential to promote new robust economies here, but we need to advance our capabilities in biomanufacturing to maintain our advantage in this area.” Hart adds: “While manufacturing feels very timely today, it is of enduring importance. Manufactured products enable our daily lives and manufacturing is critical to advancing the frontiers of technology and society. Our efforts leading up to launch of the initiative revealed great excitement about manufacturing across MIT, especially from students. Working with industry — from small to large companies, and from young startups to industrial giants — will be instrumental to creating impact and realizing the vision for new manufacturing.” In her letter to the MIT community today, Kornbluth stressed that the initiative’s goal is to drive transformation by making manufacturing more productive, resilient, and sustainable. “We want to reimagine manufacturing technologies and systems to advance fields like energy production, health care, computing, transportation, consumer products, and more,” she wrote. “And we want to reach well beyond the shop floor to tackle challenges like how to make supply chains more resilient, and how to inform public policy to foster a broad, healthy manufacturing ecosystem that can drive decades of innovation and growth.”
3:54

MIT announces the Initiative for New Manufacturing | Peter Dizikes, MIT News The Institute-wide effort aims to bolster industry and create jobs by driving innovation across vital manufacturing sectors. MIT today launched its Initiative for New Manufacturing (INM), an Institute-wide effort to reinfuse U.S. industrial production with leading-edge technologies, bolster crucial U.S. economic sectors, and ignite job creation. The initiative will encompass advanced research, innovative education programs, and partnership with companies across many sectors, in a bid to help transform manufacturing and elevate its impact. “We want to work with firms big and small, in cities, small towns and everywhere in between, to help them adopt new approaches for increased productivity,” MIT President Sally A. Kornbluth wrote in a letter to the Institute community this morning. “We want to deliberately design high-quality, human-centered manufacturing jobs that bring new life to communities across the country.” Kornbluth added: “Helping America build a future of new manufacturing is a perfect job for MIT — and I’m convinced that there is no more important work we can do to meet the moment and serve the nation now.” The Initiative for New Manufacturing also announced its first six founding industry consortium members: Amgen, Flex, GE Vernova, PTC, Sanofi, and Siemens. Participants in the INM Industry Consortium will support seed projects proposed by MIT researchers, initially in the area of artificial intelligence for manufacturing. INM joins the ranks of MIT’s other presidential initiatives — including The Climate Project at MIT; MITHIC, which supports the human-centered disciplines; MIT HEALS, centered on the life sciences and health; and MGAIC, the MIT Generative AI Impact Consortium. “There is tremendous opportunity to bring together a vibrant community working across every scale — from nanotechnology to large-scale manufacturing — and across a wide-range of applications including semiconductors, medical devices, automotive, energy systems, and biotechnology,” says Anantha Chandrakasan, MIT’s chief innovation and strategy officer and dean of engineering, who is part of the initiative’s leadership team. “MIT is uniquely positioned to harness the transformative power of digital tools and AI to shape future of manufacturing. I’m truly excited about what we can build together and the synergies this creates with other cross-cutting initiatives across the Institute.” The initiative is just the latest MIT-centered effort in recent decades aiming to expand American manufacturing. A faculty research group wrote the 1989 bestseller “Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge,” advocating for a renewal of manufacturing; another MIT project, called Production in the Innovation Economy, called for expanded manufacturing in the early 2010s. In 2016, MIT also founded The Engine, a venture fund investing in hardware-based “tough tech” start-ups including many with potential to became substantial manufacturing firms. As developed, the MIT Initiative for New Manufacturing is based around four major themes: - Reimagining manufacturing technologies and systems: realizing breakthrough technologies and system-level approaches to advance energy production, health care, computing, transportation, consumer products, and more; - Elevating the productivity and experience of manufacturing: developing and deploying new digitally driven methods and tools to amplify productivity and improve the human experience of manufacturing; - Scaling new manufacturing: accelerating the scaling of manufacturing companies and transforming supply chains to maximize efficiency and resilience, fostering product innovation and business growth; and - Transforming the manufacturing base: driving the deployment of a sustainable global manufacturing ecosystem that provides compelling opportunities to workers, with major efforts focused on the U.S. The initiative has mapped out many concrete activities and programs, which will include an Institute-wide research program on emerging technologies and other major topics; workforce and education programs; and industry engagement and participation. INM also aims to establish new labs for developing manufacturing tools and techniques; a “factory observatory” program which immerses students in manufacturing through visits to production sites; and key “pillars” focusing on areas from semiconductors and biomanufacturing to defense and aviation. The workforce and education element of INM will include TechAMP, an MIT-created program that works with community colleges to bridge the gap between technicians and engineers; AI-driven teaching tools; professional education; and an effort to expand manufacturing education on campus in collaboration with MIT departments and degree programs. INM’s leadership team has three faculty co-directors: John Hart, the Class of 1922 Professor and head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering; Suzanne Berger, Institute Professor at MIT and a political scientist who has conducted influential empirical studies of manufacturing; and Chris Love, the Raymond A. and Helen E. St. Laurent Professor of Chemical Engineering. The initiative’s executive director is Julie Diop. The initiative is in the process of forming a faculty steering committee with representation from across the Institute, as well as an external advisory board. INM stems partly from the work of the Manufacturing@MIT working group, formed in 2022 to assess many of these issues. The launch of the new initiative was previewed at a daylong MIT symposium on May 7, titled “A Vision for New Manufacturing.” The event, held before a capacity audience in MIT’s Wong Auditorium, featured over 30 speakers from a wide range of manufacturing sectors. “The rationale for growing and transforming U.S. manufacturing has never been more urgent than it is today,” Berger said at the event. “What we are trying to build at MIT now is not just another research project. … Together, with people in this room and outside this room, we’re trying to change what’s happening in our country.” “We need to think about the importance of manufacturing again, because it is what brings product ideas to people,” Love told MIT News. “For instance, in biotechnology, new life-saving medicines can’t reach patients without manufacturing. There is a real urgency about this issue for both economic prosperity and creating jobs. We have seen the impact for our country when we have lost our lead in manufacturing in some sectors. Biotechnology, where the U.S. has been the global leader for more than 40 years, offers the potential to promote new robust economies here, but we need to advance our capabilities in biomanufacturing to maintain our advantage in this area.” Hart adds: “While manufacturing feels very timely today, it is of enduring importance. Manufactured products enable our daily lives and manufacturing is critical to advancing the frontiers of technology and society. Our efforts leading up to launch of the initiative revealed great excitement about manufacturing across MIT, especially from students. Working with industry — from small to large companies, and from young startups to industrial giants — will be instrumental to creating impact and realizing the vision for new manufacturing.” In her letter to the MIT community today, Kornbluth stressed that the initiative’s goal is to drive transformation by making manufacturing more productive, resilient, and sustainable. “We want to reimagine manufacturing technologies and systems to advance fields like energy production, health care, computing, transportation, consumer products, and more,” she wrote. “And we want to reach well beyond the shop floor to tackle challenges like how to make supply chains more resilient, and how to inform public policy to foster a broad, healthy manufacturing ecosystem that can drive decades of innovation and growth.”

Owen Gregorian

77,197 views • 1 year ago

EXCLUSIVE 🚨 Harvard Jihadi Exposed The Grooming of Abdullah Akl by Imam Tom Facchine and the Islamic Network Behind Him RAIR Foundation has been warning about Abdullah Akl for a very long time — and now, tragically, we’ve been proven right, again! The man calling for acts of terrorism on American soil has been identified as Harvard graduate student Abdullah Akl — a protégé of Imam Tom Facchine, a Yaqeen Institute figure who proudly platformed and mentored him in public interviews. The very same Tom Facchine, who collaborates with Texas radical Imam Yasir Qadhi in Texas and has positioned himself as a “mainstream” Muslim voice, while quietly nurturing a new generation of Islamic revolutionaries. Tom even works with Dr. Tareq Al-Suwaidan, who is banned from entering the United States due to his promotion of jihad, antisemitic incitement, and open support for Hamas. Tom works with this BANNED Muslim Brotherhood figure and TRAINS activists in conferences held in Islamic Countries outside of Law Enforcement's reach... WAS Abdullah Akl at one of these training programs in Turkey or Malaysia!? LEARN ABOUT IS HERE: 🔥 The Grooming Ground: How Imam Tom Facchine Helped to Build Abdullah Akl In a 2024 RAIR Foundation USA exposé — “America in the Crosshairs: Imam Facchine’s Plot to Silence Dissent and Build an Islamic Army to Impose Sharia” — we documented Facchine’s strategic campaign to radicalize young Muslims under the guise of “activism.” (See here: Facchine used his platform to celebrate radicals like Abdullah Akl, calling him “the new generation of Muslim activists.” Akl, in turn, openly declared that his mission — through groups like Within Our Lifetime (WOL) and the Muslim American Society (MAS) Mosque in State Island— was to “Islamify” political activism and fuse religious dogma with militant disruption. “The Islamification of the Palestinian movement is Palestinian resistance,” Akl said. “We will not stop for anything less than liberation… from the river to the sea.” This was no accident. It was a carefully cultivated ideological grooming — endorsed, platformed, and legitimized by a U.S. imam with deep institutional ties and terror ties. 🧠 The Radical Incubator: Harvard, Yaqeen Institute, MAS Staten Island Center, and the Islamic Pipeline Harvard continues to harbor extremist ideologues who mask jihadist ambitions as “activism.” Akl is not a lone voice — he is the product of a well-funded ideological ecosystem spanning elite academia, Islamic institutions, and foreign-influenced “advocacy” groups. At the center of this ecosystem is Tom Facchine, a Yaqeen Institute imam who regularly promotes figures like Yasir Qadhi, Omar Suleiman, and Linda Sarsour — all of whom have defended Hamas or sought to normalize Islamic political power in the West. These same networks sanction radicalization under the banner of “justice,” weaponizing Western freedoms to build the very infrastructure that undermines them. ⚠️ The Warning Ignored RAIR has been warning Tom Facchine’s movement was building an Islamic army within the West — a generation taught not to integrate but to confront. We exposed the blueprint: fuse religious indoctrination with political agitation recruit through mosques and student groups frame Western resistance as oppression and demand “disruption” of daily life until Islamic goals are achieved Now, the fruit of that campaign is visible: a Harvard-trained activist openly calling for terrorism in America, while his mentors remain celebrated as “moderate scholars.” 🧨 The Network of Enablers Let’s be clear: MAS Staten Island Mosque and Imam Tom Facchine provided Akl legitimacy and mentorship. Yaqeen Institute offered him ideological cover. Within Our Lifetime gave him the activist platform. And Harvard University provided him the prestige and protection to radicalize under the banner of academia. Every one of them bears responsibility for cultivating this threat — and every one of them must be held accountable. 🗣️ RAIR’s Call to Action The United States cannot continue allowing taxpayer-funded institutions and visa-protected networks to train, empower, and platform jihadist ideologues. It’s time for: Federal investigation into the financial and organizational ties between Yaqeen Institute, MAS Staten Island, Within Our Lifetime, and groups linked to foreign Islamic movements. Congressional inquiry into Harvard’s role in enabling radical activism under the guise of “social justice.” Public exposure of every cleric, donor, and institution that has built or defended the Abdullah Akls of the world. RAIR Foundation USA sounded the alarm. The evidence is now undeniable. The question is — will our leaders finally act before the next Abdullah Akl moves from threats to action?
27:44

EXCLUSIVE 🚨 Harvard Jihadi Exposed The Grooming of Abdullah Akl by Imam Tom Facchine and the Islamic Network Behind Him RAIR Foundation has been warning about Abdullah Akl for a very long time — and now, tragically, we’ve been proven right, again! The man calling for acts of terrorism on American soil has been identified as Harvard graduate student Abdullah Akl — a protégé of Imam Tom Facchine, a Yaqeen Institute figure who proudly platformed and mentored him in public interviews. The very same Tom Facchine, who collaborates with Texas radical Imam Yasir Qadhi in Texas and has positioned himself as a “mainstream” Muslim voice, while quietly nurturing a new generation of Islamic revolutionaries. Tom even works with Dr. Tareq Al-Suwaidan, who is banned from entering the United States due to his promotion of jihad, antisemitic incitement, and open support for Hamas. Tom works with this BANNED Muslim Brotherhood figure and TRAINS activists in conferences held in Islamic Countries outside of Law Enforcement's reach... WAS Abdullah Akl at one of these training programs in Turkey or Malaysia!? LEARN ABOUT IS HERE: 🔥 The Grooming Ground: How Imam Tom Facchine Helped to Build Abdullah Akl In a 2024 RAIR Foundation USA exposé — “America in the Crosshairs: Imam Facchine’s Plot to Silence Dissent and Build an Islamic Army to Impose Sharia” — we documented Facchine’s strategic campaign to radicalize young Muslims under the guise of “activism.” (See here: Facchine used his platform to celebrate radicals like Abdullah Akl, calling him “the new generation of Muslim activists.” Akl, in turn, openly declared that his mission — through groups like Within Our Lifetime (WOL) and the Muslim American Society (MAS) Mosque in State Island— was to “Islamify” political activism and fuse religious dogma with militant disruption. “The Islamification of the Palestinian movement is Palestinian resistance,” Akl said. “We will not stop for anything less than liberation… from the river to the sea.” This was no accident. It was a carefully cultivated ideological grooming — endorsed, platformed, and legitimized by a U.S. imam with deep institutional ties and terror ties. 🧠 The Radical Incubator: Harvard, Yaqeen Institute, MAS Staten Island Center, and the Islamic Pipeline Harvard continues to harbor extremist ideologues who mask jihadist ambitions as “activism.” Akl is not a lone voice — he is the product of a well-funded ideological ecosystem spanning elite academia, Islamic institutions, and foreign-influenced “advocacy” groups. At the center of this ecosystem is Tom Facchine, a Yaqeen Institute imam who regularly promotes figures like Yasir Qadhi, Omar Suleiman, and Linda Sarsour — all of whom have defended Hamas or sought to normalize Islamic political power in the West. These same networks sanction radicalization under the banner of “justice,” weaponizing Western freedoms to build the very infrastructure that undermines them. ⚠️ The Warning Ignored RAIR has been warning Tom Facchine’s movement was building an Islamic army within the West — a generation taught not to integrate but to confront. We exposed the blueprint: fuse religious indoctrination with political agitation recruit through mosques and student groups frame Western resistance as oppression and demand “disruption” of daily life until Islamic goals are achieved Now, the fruit of that campaign is visible: a Harvard-trained activist openly calling for terrorism in America, while his mentors remain celebrated as “moderate scholars.” 🧨 The Network of Enablers Let’s be clear: MAS Staten Island Mosque and Imam Tom Facchine provided Akl legitimacy and mentorship. Yaqeen Institute offered him ideological cover. Within Our Lifetime gave him the activist platform. And Harvard University provided him the prestige and protection to radicalize under the banner of academia. Every one of them bears responsibility for cultivating this threat — and every one of them must be held accountable. 🗣️ RAIR’s Call to Action The United States cannot continue allowing taxpayer-funded institutions and visa-protected networks to train, empower, and platform jihadist ideologues. It’s time for: Federal investigation into the financial and organizational ties between Yaqeen Institute, MAS Staten Island, Within Our Lifetime, and groups linked to foreign Islamic movements. Congressional inquiry into Harvard’s role in enabling radical activism under the guise of “social justice.” Public exposure of every cleric, donor, and institution that has built or defended the Abdullah Akls of the world. RAIR Foundation USA sounded the alarm. The evidence is now undeniable. The question is — will our leaders finally act before the next Abdullah Akl moves from threats to action?

Amy Mek

243,583 views • 10 months ago

BREAKING: Articles of Impeachment Filed Against Rogue Judge Boasberg | Matt Margolis, PJ Media Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) will formally introduce articles of impeachment against radical left-wing U.S. District Judge James Boasberg for what he calls the judge’s “corrupt and unethical” role in the so-called Arctic Frost investigation. "Chief Judge Boasberg has compromised the impartiality of the judiciary and created a constitutional crisis. He is shamelessly weaponizing his power against his political opponents, including Republican members of Congress who are faithfully serving the American people within their jurisdiction," Gill told Fox News Digital. “Judge Boasberg was an accomplice in the egregious Arctic Frost scandal where he equipped the Biden DOJ to spy on Republican senators. His lack of integrity makes him clearly unfit for the gavel. I am proud to once again introduce articles of impeachment against Judge Boasberg to hold him accountable for his high crimes and misdemeanors." The articles of impeachment accuses Boasberg of authorizing unconstitutional subpoenas and nondisclosure orders as part of the FBI’s Arctic Frost probe, which, of course, was signed off by Special Counsel Jack Smith. These orders targeted Republican members of Congress—including Sens. Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, and Marsha Blackburn—while they were engaged in their official legislative duties, violating Article I protections. Boasberg is also accused of allowing the DOJ to bar AT&T from informing Senator Cruz about a subpoena for his records for at least a year, citing baseless claims that Cruz might destroy evidence or intimidate witnesses. The resolution argues Boasberg’s actions directly violated 2 U.S.C. § 6628, which protects Senate offices from such secret orders. The resolution further alleges that Boasberg enabled politically motivated subpoenas against conservative organizations like the Conservative Partnership Institute and America First Policy Institute, as well as individuals such as Jeffrey Clark, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and Jenna Ellis—suggesting the court was weaponized to suppress political opponents. The resolution concludes that Boasberg’s conduct demonstrates a “pattern of impropriety” and a failure to uphold constitutional limits, making him unfit to serve and warranting removal from office. Amen! Boasberg has faced mounting criticism for months over his blatantly partisan injunctions against the Trump administration—rulings that many legal experts say have no constitutional foundation. Previous attempts to rein in his judicial overreach and impeach Boasberg earlier this year fizzled out, but this latest effort has real momentum behind it. “Judge Boasberg, who was entrusted to sit on the bench, to be impartial and to be nonpolitical, and to basically, um, um, review cases in front of him and determine the constitutionality and the legality of the claims in front of him, he has taken it on his own to be a hyper-partisan judge, going after Republicans, signing off on subpoenas that are unlawful, and he signed off on them just to get his political rivals,” Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) said at a press conference Tuesday. “This is why he needs to be impeached. I commend Congressman Brandon Gill of Texas for leading this effort in the House, to call for articles of impeachment of Judge Boasberg.” The judiciary was never meant to be a playground for partisan power. Congress has not only the right but the obligation to act. This is a test of whether America’s institutions will defend fairness—or protect corruption that hides behind a robe and a gavel. The House must stand firm and remind the nation that no one, not even a judge, is above accountability. Read more:
1:13

BREAKING: Articles of Impeachment Filed Against Rogue Judge Boasberg | Matt Margolis, PJ Media Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) will formally introduce articles of impeachment against radical left-wing U.S. District Judge James Boasberg for what he calls the judge’s “corrupt and unethical” role in the so-called Arctic Frost investigation. "Chief Judge Boasberg has compromised the impartiality of the judiciary and created a constitutional crisis. He is shamelessly weaponizing his power against his political opponents, including Republican members of Congress who are faithfully serving the American people within their jurisdiction," Gill told Fox News Digital. “Judge Boasberg was an accomplice in the egregious Arctic Frost scandal where he equipped the Biden DOJ to spy on Republican senators. His lack of integrity makes him clearly unfit for the gavel. I am proud to once again introduce articles of impeachment against Judge Boasberg to hold him accountable for his high crimes and misdemeanors." The articles of impeachment accuses Boasberg of authorizing unconstitutional subpoenas and nondisclosure orders as part of the FBI’s Arctic Frost probe, which, of course, was signed off by Special Counsel Jack Smith. These orders targeted Republican members of Congress—including Sens. Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, and Marsha Blackburn—while they were engaged in their official legislative duties, violating Article I protections. Boasberg is also accused of allowing the DOJ to bar AT&T from informing Senator Cruz about a subpoena for his records for at least a year, citing baseless claims that Cruz might destroy evidence or intimidate witnesses. The resolution argues Boasberg’s actions directly violated 2 U.S.C. § 6628, which protects Senate offices from such secret orders. The resolution further alleges that Boasberg enabled politically motivated subpoenas against conservative organizations like the Conservative Partnership Institute and America First Policy Institute, as well as individuals such as Jeffrey Clark, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and Jenna Ellis—suggesting the court was weaponized to suppress political opponents. The resolution concludes that Boasberg’s conduct demonstrates a “pattern of impropriety” and a failure to uphold constitutional limits, making him unfit to serve and warranting removal from office. Amen! Boasberg has faced mounting criticism for months over his blatantly partisan injunctions against the Trump administration—rulings that many legal experts say have no constitutional foundation. Previous attempts to rein in his judicial overreach and impeach Boasberg earlier this year fizzled out, but this latest effort has real momentum behind it. “Judge Boasberg, who was entrusted to sit on the bench, to be impartial and to be nonpolitical, and to basically, um, um, review cases in front of him and determine the constitutionality and the legality of the claims in front of him, he has taken it on his own to be a hyper-partisan judge, going after Republicans, signing off on subpoenas that are unlawful, and he signed off on them just to get his political rivals,” Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) said at a press conference Tuesday. “This is why he needs to be impeached. I commend Congressman Brandon Gill of Texas for leading this effort in the House, to call for articles of impeachment of Judge Boasberg.” The judiciary was never meant to be a playground for partisan power. Congress has not only the right but the obligation to act. This is a test of whether America’s institutions will defend fairness—or protect corruption that hides behind a robe and a gavel. The House must stand firm and remind the nation that no one, not even a judge, is above accountability. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

42,693 views • 9 months ago

🚨THREAT ALERT AMERICA! MILITARY VETERAN RISES UP! HERO JAMES REID FOUGHT FOR AMERICA OVERSEAS- NOW HE'S FIGHTING TO SAVE HIS HOMETOWN FROM ISLAMIZATION LaSalle County, Illinois. A quiet rural area. A former Holiday Inn resort on 165 acres in Sheridan. A Pakistani imam named Jamil Ahmed Sukhera (founder of Vairt / V Resort Living) wants to turn it into a $400 million gated Muslim enclave - complete with its own mosque, school, halal economy, waterpark, golf, and everything so residents "truly never have to leave" into American society. He’s marketing it worldwide to foreign Muslims. He runs a visa company (Vmigrant) that funnels people and money into the U.S. He openly talks in Urdu interviews about the "next war is of the merchants" - spreading Islam through business and economic power, not armies. He brags about building an "Ummah-wide system" and turning American soil into a base for the next generation of Muslim billionaires who will "lead the world ethically" (under Sharia, in his context). 🚨His other property? A potential National Security Threat! A retreat in Waynesboro, Pennsylvania - right beside America’s "underground Pentagon" (Raven Rock Mountain Complex), the top-secret nuclear bunker where our leaders would hide in a war. This is happening. Right now. In the heartland. 💥Enter James Reid - a true American hero. Marine Corps veteran. Served in the Middle East. Saw Sharia law in action with his own eyes. Former San Francisco police officer. Now a LaSalle County Board member. At the June 8th board meeting, in front of a packed room, he said what almost no elected official has the guts to say anymore: “The original pamphlet that went out very clearly stated that this would be a gated, fenced community operated under strict Sharia. I don’t know about anybody else in this room. I served three years in the Middle East. That is not conducive to the Constitution of the United States. My worry about this is that these gentlemen standing behind me, or anybody else in LaSalle County law enforcement, will be called to that facility and not allowed through the gate. I have had the experience of seeing how Sharia works. I have seen people stoned to death. I have seen women beaten in the street just for being women, and I will not allow this in this county. I don’t care. This will not happen in LaSalle County.” He didn’t stutter. He didn’t apologize. He stood for the Constitution, for American women and girls, and for the rule of law. And what happened next? The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) - the same organization designated in Florida and Texas as a TERRORIST ORGANISATION.....immediately rushed in to demand he be censured. They called his factual, experience-based warning “Islamophobic.” They demanded the board punish a VETERAN for protecting his community. This is the audacity of the machine. They want to build parallel societies on our soil. They want to import people who reject assimilation. They want to silence the few patriots left who still have the spine to say: “Not in my county. Not on my watch.” James Reid is not the problem. James Reid is the solution. He is the kind of man this country was built on - men who’ve seen the darkness of Sharia up close and refuse to let it take root here. To every American who still loves this country: Stand with James Reid. Show up to EVERY SINGLE LaSalle County Board meeting. Demand full transparency on the financing, the foreign investors, and the real plans for this property. Support every patriot willing to speak the truth before it’s too late. This is about OUR survival as a NATION! Sharia has no place in America. Gated foreign enclaves that operate as mini-caliphates have no place in America. And organizations that attack veterans for telling the truth have no place dictating our future. James Reid - you are MY hero. READ OUT FULL REPORT - WHERE IS OUR GOVERNMENT!?
2:51

🚨THREAT ALERT AMERICA! MILITARY VETERAN RISES UP! HERO JAMES REID FOUGHT FOR AMERICA OVERSEAS- NOW HE'S FIGHTING TO SAVE HIS HOMETOWN FROM ISLAMIZATION LaSalle County, Illinois. A quiet rural area. A former Holiday Inn resort on 165 acres in Sheridan. A Pakistani imam named Jamil Ahmed Sukhera (founder of Vairt / V Resort Living) wants to turn it into a $400 million gated Muslim enclave - complete with its own mosque, school, halal economy, waterpark, golf, and everything so residents "truly never have to leave" into American society. He’s marketing it worldwide to foreign Muslims. He runs a visa company (Vmigrant) that funnels people and money into the U.S. He openly talks in Urdu interviews about the "next war is of the merchants" - spreading Islam through business and economic power, not armies. He brags about building an "Ummah-wide system" and turning American soil into a base for the next generation of Muslim billionaires who will "lead the world ethically" (under Sharia, in his context). 🚨His other property? A potential National Security Threat! A retreat in Waynesboro, Pennsylvania - right beside America’s "underground Pentagon" (Raven Rock Mountain Complex), the top-secret nuclear bunker where our leaders would hide in a war. This is happening. Right now. In the heartland. 💥Enter James Reid - a true American hero. Marine Corps veteran. Served in the Middle East. Saw Sharia law in action with his own eyes. Former San Francisco police officer. Now a LaSalle County Board member. At the June 8th board meeting, in front of a packed room, he said what almost no elected official has the guts to say anymore: “The original pamphlet that went out very clearly stated that this would be a gated, fenced community operated under strict Sharia. I don’t know about anybody else in this room. I served three years in the Middle East. That is not conducive to the Constitution of the United States. My worry about this is that these gentlemen standing behind me, or anybody else in LaSalle County law enforcement, will be called to that facility and not allowed through the gate. I have had the experience of seeing how Sharia works. I have seen people stoned to death. I have seen women beaten in the street just for being women, and I will not allow this in this county. I don’t care. This will not happen in LaSalle County.” He didn’t stutter. He didn’t apologize. He stood for the Constitution, for American women and girls, and for the rule of law. And what happened next? The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) - the same organization designated in Florida and Texas as a TERRORIST ORGANISATION.....immediately rushed in to demand he be censured. They called his factual, experience-based warning “Islamophobic.” They demanded the board punish a VETERAN for protecting his community. This is the audacity of the machine. They want to build parallel societies on our soil. They want to import people who reject assimilation. They want to silence the few patriots left who still have the spine to say: “Not in my county. Not on my watch.” James Reid is not the problem. James Reid is the solution. He is the kind of man this country was built on - men who’ve seen the darkness of Sharia up close and refuse to let it take root here. To every American who still loves this country: Stand with James Reid. Show up to EVERY SINGLE LaSalle County Board meeting. Demand full transparency on the financing, the foreign investors, and the real plans for this property. Support every patriot willing to speak the truth before it’s too late. This is about OUR survival as a NATION! Sharia has no place in America. Gated foreign enclaves that operate as mini-caliphates have no place in America. And organizations that attack veterans for telling the truth have no place dictating our future. James Reid - you are MY hero. READ OUT FULL REPORT - WHERE IS OUR GOVERNMENT!?

Amy Mek

186,567 views • 28 days ago

This is perhaps the most important and powerful case against AUKUS that I've heard, especially because it comes from one of Australia's preeminent strategic thinkers: Hugh White, inaugural Director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) and former Deputy Secretary for Strategy and Intelligence in the Australian Department of Defence. Here's what he says: - White argues that the era of Anglo-Saxon (British and American) dominance in the Western Pacific is ending. He states: "We are facing one of the, perhaps the biggest transformation in our shared international setting since European settlement." This transformation is driven by China's rise as an economic and military power comparable to the United States. - As a result he argues that there's no alternative to treating China as an equal partner: "Nobody really knows what America's aim in Asia is. But one thing's for sure, nobody in Washington thinks they should treat China as an equal partner. And my basic argument to my many friends in Washington is that if they don't treat China as an equal partner, then they're going to be taking on a rivalry with China that I don't think they can win." - He emphasizes this point repeatedly, arguing that given China's economic and military power, especially in the Western Pacific, the U.S. cannot maintain its previous position of uncontested primacy: "I don't see how, in an era where China's economy is as big as America's, in an era where its military power in the West Pacific is really quite comparable to America's, in an era where China is increasingly potent as a nuclear armed power, the US and China can find a way to get on in which the United States doesn't, at the very least, treat China as an equal partner." - White sees AUKUS as problematic because it aligns Australia (and potentially New Zealand) with a U.S. strategy that refuses to acknowledge this new reality. He argues that by supporting AUKUS, these countries are effectively endorsing a primacy approach that is "not a smart way to go" and risks destroying both their prosperity and their security, because they'll "only be prosperous and secure if the United States and China can find a way to get on." - On the economic benefits arguably brought by AUKUS: "The idea that you buy those economic benefits at the price of committing yourself to support an approach to this really fundamental question about the shape of our future order in Asia, which I don't think is going to work, that would be a very high price to pay for a very doubtful benefit."
7:53

This is perhaps the most important and powerful case against AUKUS that I've heard, especially because it comes from one of Australia's preeminent strategic thinkers: Hugh White, inaugural Director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) and former Deputy Secretary for Strategy and Intelligence in the Australian Department of Defence. Here's what he says: - White argues that the era of Anglo-Saxon (British and American) dominance in the Western Pacific is ending. He states: "We are facing one of the, perhaps the biggest transformation in our shared international setting since European settlement." This transformation is driven by China's rise as an economic and military power comparable to the United States. - As a result he argues that there's no alternative to treating China as an equal partner: "Nobody really knows what America's aim in Asia is. But one thing's for sure, nobody in Washington thinks they should treat China as an equal partner. And my basic argument to my many friends in Washington is that if they don't treat China as an equal partner, then they're going to be taking on a rivalry with China that I don't think they can win." - He emphasizes this point repeatedly, arguing that given China's economic and military power, especially in the Western Pacific, the U.S. cannot maintain its previous position of uncontested primacy: "I don't see how, in an era where China's economy is as big as America's, in an era where its military power in the West Pacific is really quite comparable to America's, in an era where China is increasingly potent as a nuclear armed power, the US and China can find a way to get on in which the United States doesn't, at the very least, treat China as an equal partner." - White sees AUKUS as problematic because it aligns Australia (and potentially New Zealand) with a U.S. strategy that refuses to acknowledge this new reality. He argues that by supporting AUKUS, these countries are effectively endorsing a primacy approach that is "not a smart way to go" and risks destroying both their prosperity and their security, because they'll "only be prosperous and secure if the United States and China can find a way to get on." - On the economic benefits arguably brought by AUKUS: "The idea that you buy those economic benefits at the price of committing yourself to support an approach to this really fundamental question about the shape of our future order in Asia, which I don't think is going to work, that would be a very high price to pay for a very doubtful benefit."

Arnaud Bertrand

395,098 views • 2 years ago

President Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute on the Johnny Carson show, 1/3/1975. This aired shortly after he finished his 2nd term as the Governor of California. In this segment, President Reagan talks about various issues of the federal government. He describes the federal government as being its own legislative body (which is unconstitutional), that creates regulations (laws). He also explains how taxing people more, does not solve inflation. Furthermore, he delved into the thousands of useless government grants that are a burden to the taxpayer, and informs everyone that the government is the problem. In my opinion, Donald J. Trump’s government reduction (drain the swamp) and fiscal responsibility aspirations, are extremely reminiscent of what President Reagan expressed here. (This is prior to him becoming president) If nothing else, I hope you learn something; as our corrupt government is a lot worse now, then it was then. Based on this video, it seems like people have been programmed to be oblivious to what’s actually happening, and if they aren’t oblivious, they’re programmed not to care about the actual issues. Because if they weren’t programmed, our country wouldn’t have come to such a low point. We are currently the laughing stock of the world. We are the sheep to the bureaucrats who want to dictate our every move, and keep us fighting each other for scraps, while they bask in our misery and hard work. They have invented issues, and other false narratives, to enslave us. While we’re busy fighting each other (unbeknownst to us) on false pretenses, they’re busy eating away at our rights, destroying our country, and the foundation of what makes us American. We have left our eye off the ball for far too long, and now they’ve changed the game. We must take back what is ours, before there’s nothing left to take back. #USA #MakeAmericaGreatAgain #MakeAmericaHealthyAgain #ProudToBeAmerican #FightFightFight
23:46

President Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute on the Johnny Carson show, 1/3/1975. This aired shortly after he finished his 2nd term as the Governor of California. In this segment, President Reagan talks about various issues of the federal government. He describes the federal government as being its own legislative body (which is unconstitutional), that creates regulations (laws). He also explains how taxing people more, does not solve inflation. Furthermore, he delved into the thousands of useless government grants that are a burden to the taxpayer, and informs everyone that the government is the problem. In my opinion, Donald J. Trump’s government reduction (drain the swamp) and fiscal responsibility aspirations, are extremely reminiscent of what President Reagan expressed here. (This is prior to him becoming president) If nothing else, I hope you learn something; as our corrupt government is a lot worse now, then it was then. Based on this video, it seems like people have been programmed to be oblivious to what’s actually happening, and if they aren’t oblivious, they’re programmed not to care about the actual issues. Because if they weren’t programmed, our country wouldn’t have come to such a low point. We are currently the laughing stock of the world. We are the sheep to the bureaucrats who want to dictate our every move, and keep us fighting each other for scraps, while they bask in our misery and hard work. They have invented issues, and other false narratives, to enslave us. While we’re busy fighting each other (unbeknownst to us) on false pretenses, they’re busy eating away at our rights, destroying our country, and the foundation of what makes us American. We have left our eye off the ball for far too long, and now they’ve changed the game. We must take back what is ours, before there’s nothing left to take back. #USA #MakeAmericaGreatAgain #MakeAmericaHealthyAgain #ProudToBeAmerican #FightFightFight

Reliable Brain 🇺🇸

10,434 views • 1 year ago

Toby Rogers, PhD explains how autism must be caused "mostly [by] vaccines": 🔥"88% of autism cases are characterized by regression...[suggesting] an acute toxic exposure, not genetics...We know beyond a reasonable doubt toxicants, mostly from vaccines... are causing autism." 🔥"If we repeal the 1980 Bayh Dole act, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury act and the 2005 PREP Act, that would remove the structural incentives that created the autism epidemic and the chronic disease epidemics in this country." Per Children's Health Defense: "Rogers is a fellow with the Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research. He has a doctorate in political economy from the University of Sydney in Australia, and a Master of Public Policy from the University of California, Berkeley." -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "So just to wrap up, an estimated 115,000 children develop autism every year in the United States. That means that 315 children develop autism every day in the U.S. now if Dr. Sally Ozonoff's work is correct and she's at UC Davis, she shows that 88% of autism cases are characterized by regression. That means that. So if she's right about that, and I think she is, that means that 277 children regress into autism every day in the United States. "Now regression suggests an acute toxic exposure, not genetics, not better awareness, an acute toxic exposure, which means that most cases of autism are preventable. Autism is not a medical or scientific mystery. We know beyond a reasonable doubt that toxicants, mostly from vaccines and about a dozen additional toxicants, are causing autism. "If we repeal the 1980 Bayh Dole act, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury act and the 2005 PREP act, that would remove the structural incentives that created the autism epidemic and the chronic disease epidemics in this country."
1:26

Toby Rogers, PhD explains how autism must be caused "mostly [by] vaccines": 🔥"88% of autism cases are characterized by regression...[suggesting] an acute toxic exposure, not genetics...We know beyond a reasonable doubt toxicants, mostly from vaccines... are causing autism." 🔥"If we repeal the 1980 Bayh Dole act, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury act and the 2005 PREP Act, that would remove the structural incentives that created the autism epidemic and the chronic disease epidemics in this country." Per Children's Health Defense: "Rogers is a fellow with the Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research. He has a doctorate in political economy from the University of Sydney in Australia, and a Master of Public Policy from the University of California, Berkeley." -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "So just to wrap up, an estimated 115,000 children develop autism every year in the United States. That means that 315 children develop autism every day in the U.S. now if Dr. Sally Ozonoff's work is correct and she's at UC Davis, she shows that 88% of autism cases are characterized by regression. That means that. So if she's right about that, and I think she is, that means that 277 children regress into autism every day in the United States. "Now regression suggests an acute toxic exposure, not genetics, not better awareness, an acute toxic exposure, which means that most cases of autism are preventable. Autism is not a medical or scientific mystery. We know beyond a reasonable doubt that toxicants, mostly from vaccines and about a dozen additional toxicants, are causing autism. "If we repeal the 1980 Bayh Dole act, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury act and the 2005 PREP act, that would remove the structural incentives that created the autism epidemic and the chronic disease epidemics in this country."

Sense Receptor

94,179 views • 11 months ago

****** The Best 9/11 WTC Explosive Evidence in 30-Min. — Richard Gage, AIA, Architect [Slides Restored!] ****** Building 7 and the Twin Towers | Do you know what really happened? ****** I delivered one of two dozen presentations at Turning the Tide — the 24th 9/11 truth anniversary conference in Washington DC, September 2025. Originally, there were no slides recorded due to glitches. Now they have all been fully restored thanks to Barbara Honegger and Mark Snyder. So, this is the best 30-minute presentation on the subject anywhere. We stuffed 90-minutes of powerful explosive evidence into a 30-minute speaking slot! The best is there. Share it widely with your skeptical friends — this is their best shot to “get it.” Don’t deprive them of the opportunity. It's the body of proof that has convinced more than 3,600 architects & engineers to publicly demand a new 9/11 WTC investigation! We will post an article for each of the two dozen incredible presentations, all newly-restored, to this email list — as well as on the Turning the Tide conference website for you to review. ****** San Francisco Bay area architect Richard Gage, AIA, is a member of the American Institute of Architects and founder & former CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. He now leads the charge for a new World Trade Center investigation along with his courageous wife Gail at RichardGage911. Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the WTC high-rises after hearing the startling conclusions of a reluctant 9/11 researcher, David Ray Griffin, on the radio in 2006, which launched his own unyielding quest for the truth about 9/11. The organization he founded, AE911Truth, now numbers more than 3,600 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation into the explosive destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings on 9/11. As an architect, he has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed steel-framed buildings. Most recently, he worked on the construction documents for a $400M mixed-use urban project with 1.2 million square feet of retail, parking structure, and mid-rise office space — altogether about 1,200 tons of steel framing. Please welcome Richard Gage, AIA, Architect.
30:19

****** The Best 9/11 WTC Explosive Evidence in 30-Min. — Richard Gage, AIA, Architect [Slides Restored!] ****** Building 7 and the Twin Towers | Do you know what really happened? ****** I delivered one of two dozen presentations at Turning the Tide — the 24th 9/11 truth anniversary conference in Washington DC, September 2025. Originally, there were no slides recorded due to glitches. Now they have all been fully restored thanks to Barbara Honegger and Mark Snyder. So, this is the best 30-minute presentation on the subject anywhere. We stuffed 90-minutes of powerful explosive evidence into a 30-minute speaking slot! The best is there. Share it widely with your skeptical friends — this is their best shot to “get it.” Don’t deprive them of the opportunity. It's the body of proof that has convinced more than 3,600 architects & engineers to publicly demand a new 9/11 WTC investigation! We will post an article for each of the two dozen incredible presentations, all newly-restored, to this email list — as well as on the Turning the Tide conference website for you to review. ****** San Francisco Bay area architect Richard Gage, AIA, is a member of the American Institute of Architects and founder & former CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. He now leads the charge for a new World Trade Center investigation along with his courageous wife Gail at RichardGage911. Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the WTC high-rises after hearing the startling conclusions of a reluctant 9/11 researcher, David Ray Griffin, on the radio in 2006, which launched his own unyielding quest for the truth about 9/11. The organization he founded, AE911Truth, now numbers more than 3,600 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation into the explosive destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings on 9/11. As an architect, he has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed steel-framed buildings. Most recently, he worked on the construction documents for a $400M mixed-use urban project with 1.2 million square feet of retail, parking structure, and mid-rise office space — altogether about 1,200 tons of steel framing. Please welcome Richard Gage, AIA, Architect.

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

11,398 views • 3 months ago

"Have you seen any evidence of DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS use, here on American soil?" "There are several instances of individuals being hit in what appears to be both sonic energy and forms of rapidly pulsed microwave energy, domestically. Some cases in Florida, some cases in the Delaware, Maryland, DC area, and some cases on the West Coast as well." - Dr. James Giordano Dr. James Giordano is head of the Center for Strategic Deterrence and Weapons of Mass Destruction Studies, Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS), National Defense University. Dr. Giordano is internationally recognized for his research on the use of neurocognitive sciences and technology in military and intelligence operations, has connections to DARPA, the Pentagon, etc. Let's go a little deeper on this tech and help you understand how advanced this tech is and what other forms are out there... This will focus more on the individual non-lethal tech. but is probably the most dangerous. There is also laser type weapons that can shoot done drones and all types of disrupting technology that was mentioned during the Maduro raid in Venezuela. There are many types of weapons in use. Artificial Telepathic, Neurotechnology, Mind Controller and Wireless Direct Energy Weapons, satellites, microwaves that put voices in your head, secret patents for remote brain control, and psychotronic torture used on civilians. Governments and agencies, primarily U.S., CIA, DARPA, Pentagon, DoD, also NATO, Soviet/Russian programs, and others, have developed and secretly deploy "mind weapons" psychotronic, directed-energy technologies against unwitting civilians, "Targeted Individuals" or TIs. Spy agencies, military, research institutes, and defense companies develop and deploy these technologies as weapons of mass destruction, espionage, and electronic warfare. These weapons are used for non-consensual experimentation, harassment, torture, isolation, and population control. There are lethal and non-lethal. Attacks occur in phases. First surveillance, satellites like Echelon, then directed-energy assaults causing physical pain, psychological destruction, induced voices/sounds, and behavior change. Victims are systematically discredited by labeling them mentally ill, schizophrenia, etc. Historical roots trace back in MKULTRA, Bluebird-era programs, Korean War "brainwashing" fears, Soviet Lida device, and microwave attacks on the US Embassy in Moscow. Super Artificial Intelligence Computer / Super Computer (satellite-based). A powerful non-contact weapon, radiation weapon, and weapon of mass destruction. Wireless Remote Neural Monitoring / Deep Tech Scanner, reads brain waves, sees inside the body, organs, veins, nervous system, without implants, uploads brain data to the satellite AI in seconds. Artificial / Synthetic Telepathy and brain-machine interface research, DARPA-funded university projects using EEG/MEG to decode thoughts. There's two types: - Active method: victim hears voices, like aliens, gods, or dead people, 24/7, causing fear, confusion, and mental breakdown. - Silent method: inaudible, hypnotic, "most dangerous," plays with the mind without the victim realizing. Voice to Skull (V2K) / Microwave Hearing, induces sounds/voices directly in the brain via microwaves. Wireless Direct Energy Weapons (DEWs), microwave, sonic (ultrasound/infrasound), scalar waves that damage organs, nerves, eyes, hearing, or electronics without physical contact. Bio Electro Magnetic Weapon and Psychotronic, Hypnotic Technology, controls neurons, brain waves, and behavior from a distance. Many of the patents and research programs can be found for this technology are real and public, non-lethal weapons, brain-computer interfaces, EM effects on the body/brain have legitimate scientific and military history. The most important aspects to this tech that you should understand is that: - No implants or chips needed, many devices work via waves, frequencies, radiation, and beams. - Can hack electronics, jam networks, disable vehicles/planes, damage appliances. - Range: several miles with "no limit." Here is a list of some patents you can look up yourself: - US 3,951,134: Remotely monitoring and altering brain waves. - US 6,011,991 A - DE 10 253 433 A1 - US 5,159,703 A: Silent Subliminal Presentation System, induces messages without audible sound. - US 4,717,343: Method of changing a person's behavior. - US 4,686,685: Altering regions of the Earth's atmosphere/ionosphere/magnetosphere, HAARP-related. There is much more to learn and understand, but know that this is very real and can do things to people that would almost be considered magic until you understand how it really works.
5:30

"Have you seen any evidence of DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS use, here on American soil?" "There are several instances of individuals being hit in what appears to be both sonic energy and forms of rapidly pulsed microwave energy, domestically. Some cases in Florida, some cases in the Delaware, Maryland, DC area, and some cases on the West Coast as well." - Dr. James Giordano Dr. James Giordano is head of the Center for Strategic Deterrence and Weapons of Mass Destruction Studies, Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS), National Defense University. Dr. Giordano is internationally recognized for his research on the use of neurocognitive sciences and technology in military and intelligence operations, has connections to DARPA, the Pentagon, etc. Let's go a little deeper on this tech and help you understand how advanced this tech is and what other forms are out there... This will focus more on the individual non-lethal tech. but is probably the most dangerous. There is also laser type weapons that can shoot done drones and all types of disrupting technology that was mentioned during the Maduro raid in Venezuela. There are many types of weapons in use. Artificial Telepathic, Neurotechnology, Mind Controller and Wireless Direct Energy Weapons, satellites, microwaves that put voices in your head, secret patents for remote brain control, and psychotronic torture used on civilians. Governments and agencies, primarily U.S., CIA, DARPA, Pentagon, DoD, also NATO, Soviet/Russian programs, and others, have developed and secretly deploy "mind weapons" psychotronic, directed-energy technologies against unwitting civilians, "Targeted Individuals" or TIs. Spy agencies, military, research institutes, and defense companies develop and deploy these technologies as weapons of mass destruction, espionage, and electronic warfare. These weapons are used for non-consensual experimentation, harassment, torture, isolation, and population control. There are lethal and non-lethal. Attacks occur in phases. First surveillance, satellites like Echelon, then directed-energy assaults causing physical pain, psychological destruction, induced voices/sounds, and behavior change. Victims are systematically discredited by labeling them mentally ill, schizophrenia, etc. Historical roots trace back in MKULTRA, Bluebird-era programs, Korean War "brainwashing" fears, Soviet Lida device, and microwave attacks on the US Embassy in Moscow. Super Artificial Intelligence Computer / Super Computer (satellite-based). A powerful non-contact weapon, radiation weapon, and weapon of mass destruction. Wireless Remote Neural Monitoring / Deep Tech Scanner, reads brain waves, sees inside the body, organs, veins, nervous system, without implants, uploads brain data to the satellite AI in seconds. Artificial / Synthetic Telepathy and brain-machine interface research, DARPA-funded university projects using EEG/MEG to decode thoughts. There's two types: - Active method: victim hears voices, like aliens, gods, or dead people, 24/7, causing fear, confusion, and mental breakdown. - Silent method: inaudible, hypnotic, "most dangerous," plays with the mind without the victim realizing. Voice to Skull (V2K) / Microwave Hearing, induces sounds/voices directly in the brain via microwaves. Wireless Direct Energy Weapons (DEWs), microwave, sonic (ultrasound/infrasound), scalar waves that damage organs, nerves, eyes, hearing, or electronics without physical contact. Bio Electro Magnetic Weapon and Psychotronic, Hypnotic Technology, controls neurons, brain waves, and behavior from a distance. Many of the patents and research programs can be found for this technology are real and public, non-lethal weapons, brain-computer interfaces, EM effects on the body/brain have legitimate scientific and military history. The most important aspects to this tech that you should understand is that: - No implants or chips needed, many devices work via waves, frequencies, radiation, and beams. - Can hack electronics, jam networks, disable vehicles/planes, damage appliances. - Range: several miles with "no limit." Here is a list of some patents you can look up yourself: - US 3,951,134: Remotely monitoring and altering brain waves. - US 6,011,991 A - DE 10 253 433 A1 - US 5,159,703 A: Silent Subliminal Presentation System, induces messages without audible sound. - US 4,717,343: Method of changing a person's behavior. - US 4,686,685: Altering regions of the Earth's atmosphere/ionosphere/magnetosphere, HAARP-related. There is much more to learn and understand, but know that this is very real and can do things to people that would almost be considered magic until you understand how it really works.

The SCIF

64,959 views • 1 month ago

🔥👀ARE WE SEEING IT YET? What is Thune up to in Texas? If Talarico wins do you know what this could actually mean for Texas? Watch & read this all the way to the end and tell me if everything clicks. We have a SERIOUS problem in Texas. The same GOP groups that spent $120 MILLION (Election history record) supporting Cornyn & attacking Paxton have only spent $500k on Paxton since he won the nomination. The Democrats have spent 48x more money supporting Talarico & attacking Paxton. Why doesn’t everyone know this? Thune essentially controls the spending. Wanna bet the money that Democrats were gonna spend on Platner will now be diverted to Texas? Just weeks ago…. Obama flew into Austin for a surprise in-person appearance with his hand-picked candidate. James Talarico. 37. Never married. Zero public relationships or girlfriends in all these years. He’s always said he’s straight. But his only dating history mention? One single line in Texas Monthly… quietly inserted by his own campaign team after the fact. They claimed he dated the homecoming queen back when he was the theater kid superstar in high school. For years: publicly single, private life. Then — right as questions heated up — he suddenly flies to LA for an emergency podcast drop and reveals he has a girlfriend. Calls her “my rock. My best friend.” Days later? She appears out of nowhere in a perfectly timed media story with “obtained” photos that raise more questions than answers. Here’s the thing: Her name is Brianna Menard — his former Chief of Staff. Her old bio highlighted “dancing the night away” at Cheer Up Charlie’s… Austin’s biggest queer-friendly bar famous for drag nights and the LGBTQ scene. Talarico brands himself as a devout Christian with Christmas sermons and family faith at the center. She’s a committed vegan, yoga buff, with a prominent “Jai Gurudev” Hindu spiritual tattoo. His progressive church library? Stocked with Gender Queer, All Boys Aren’t Blue, and This Book Is Gay — the exact books parents fought to pull from Texas school libraries. Four years of “dating” and she’s completely missing from every single Christmas or holiday post. No photos. No mentions. No family integration. They now claim annual Austin City Limits trips and Big Bend getaways… but those photos only dropped the second scrutiny got loud. No dates. Could be friends. Almost zero clear romantic shots. Why hide a former subordinate turned “girlfriend” for years? Democrats hammer everyone else on that. Or… maybe she was the safest public choice. An ally who would stay on message. (She’s since deleted her socials and now works for a PAC.) Meanwhile, national Dem heavyweights just poured over $30 MILLION into his campaign — big checks from Reid Hoffman, Pritzker, LA & NYC elites. Nearly half the large donations coming from outside Texas. They’re all-in on flipping red Texas. Texas has elected exactly ONLY ONE gay member of Congress in its history. Never an openly gay Senator. We know Obama is his kingmaker. We know Eric Holder vetted Tim Walz before being chosen as VP. We know Holder is Obama’s wingman. Now who did Tim Walz pardon last week? I was right on Platner almost a year ago that he was selected. THE LEFT IS CHOOSING THESE CANDIDATES FOR A REASON. He’s attended multiple Pride events. So I have to ask… Has Talarico himself ever spent real time at Cheer Up Charlie’s? Make sure everyone in Texas sees this ASAP. Is the Uniparty tanking Texas as revenge over Cornyn? WE CANNOT LOSE TEXAS.
3:33

🔥👀ARE WE SEEING IT YET? What is Thune up to in Texas? If Talarico wins do you know what this could actually mean for Texas? Watch & read this all the way to the end and tell me if everything clicks. We have a SERIOUS problem in Texas. The same GOP groups that spent $120 MILLION (Election history record) supporting Cornyn & attacking Paxton have only spent $500k on Paxton since he won the nomination. The Democrats have spent 48x more money supporting Talarico & attacking Paxton. Why doesn’t everyone know this? Thune essentially controls the spending. Wanna bet the money that Democrats were gonna spend on Platner will now be diverted to Texas? Just weeks ago…. Obama flew into Austin for a surprise in-person appearance with his hand-picked candidate. James Talarico. 37. Never married. Zero public relationships or girlfriends in all these years. He’s always said he’s straight. But his only dating history mention? One single line in Texas Monthly… quietly inserted by his own campaign team after the fact. They claimed he dated the homecoming queen back when he was the theater kid superstar in high school. For years: publicly single, private life. Then — right as questions heated up — he suddenly flies to LA for an emergency podcast drop and reveals he has a girlfriend. Calls her “my rock. My best friend.” Days later? She appears out of nowhere in a perfectly timed media story with “obtained” photos that raise more questions than answers. Here’s the thing: Her name is Brianna Menard — his former Chief of Staff. Her old bio highlighted “dancing the night away” at Cheer Up Charlie’s… Austin’s biggest queer-friendly bar famous for drag nights and the LGBTQ scene. Talarico brands himself as a devout Christian with Christmas sermons and family faith at the center. She’s a committed vegan, yoga buff, with a prominent “Jai Gurudev” Hindu spiritual tattoo. His progressive church library? Stocked with Gender Queer, All Boys Aren’t Blue, and This Book Is Gay — the exact books parents fought to pull from Texas school libraries. Four years of “dating” and she’s completely missing from every single Christmas or holiday post. No photos. No mentions. No family integration. They now claim annual Austin City Limits trips and Big Bend getaways… but those photos only dropped the second scrutiny got loud. No dates. Could be friends. Almost zero clear romantic shots. Why hide a former subordinate turned “girlfriend” for years? Democrats hammer everyone else on that. Or… maybe she was the safest public choice. An ally who would stay on message. (She’s since deleted her socials and now works for a PAC.) Meanwhile, national Dem heavyweights just poured over $30 MILLION into his campaign — big checks from Reid Hoffman, Pritzker, LA & NYC elites. Nearly half the large donations coming from outside Texas. They’re all-in on flipping red Texas. Texas has elected exactly ONLY ONE gay member of Congress in its history. Never an openly gay Senator. We know Obama is his kingmaker. We know Eric Holder vetted Tim Walz before being chosen as VP. We know Holder is Obama’s wingman. Now who did Tim Walz pardon last week? I was right on Platner almost a year ago that he was selected. THE LEFT IS CHOOSING THESE CANDIDATES FOR A REASON. He’s attended multiple Pride events. So I have to ask… Has Talarico himself ever spent real time at Cheer Up Charlie’s? Make sure everyone in Texas sees this ASAP. Is the Uniparty tanking Texas as revenge over Cornyn? WE CANNOT LOSE TEXAS.

Johnny St.Pete

12,700 views • 29 days ago

🔥HYPER-CRUCIAL INSIGHT🔥 "Fauci was not in charge...He was the public relations face of the policy...The government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council...and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world." (1/5) Debbie Lerman, a 2023 Brownstone (Brownstone Institute) Fellow and retired science writer, describes for FLCCC (Independent Medical Alliance) Senior Fellow Dr. Kat Lindley (Dr. Kat Lindley) how former NIAID head Anthony Fauci **was not in any way in charge of COVID policy.** Instead, Lerman notes that the National Security Council was in charge of COVID policy. While Lerman notes that Fauci is indeed "a terrible person" who should be "on trial," she says that "that's [not] where we should be focusing all of our attention." "The biodefense global public–partnership includes all of the public health agencies and stuff on a national level, but they're not the ones who are in charge," Lerman says. "So they're the ones who are just enacting the policy, and that's where everybody has to be really, really clear: Fauci was not in charge. Please get that out of your mind. We can prosecute him. We can blame him for a lot of things. [But] he didn't make the policy. He didn't come up with the policy, and he didn't enforce the policy. He was the public relations face of the policy. He's a terrible person. [And I] would be happy if he were on trial, but I don't think that's where we should be focusing all of our attention." Lerman goes on to discuss Deborah Birx, who was also on the COVID "Task Force." "Deborah Birx...she came [in as] the representative of the national security state...[And] what I discovered through my research is that the government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council." "And so I just went where my research took me, and, unfortunately, that's where it took me," Lerman adds. "And so I had to go there. And so the National Security Council is defined as the leaders of the military and intelligence arms of government that are advising the President on national security. That's the definition. Now that was the definition before COVID. They changed it. So you have to look at the Wayback Machine to find that definition." Lerman goes on to say: "Now the way they define it is, yes, it's the intelligence and military, but...it's also pandemics, disasters—anything that requires national coordination now is going to be coordinated through the National Security Council. That's scary because...they have expanded the definition of what the National Security Council is supposed to do, and in doing that, they've incorporated public health into what they call a biosecurity framework...[and] the one that they came up with is based on a biodefense response to outbreaks, which is lockdown until vaccine. "What that was supposed to be for, it was supposed to be for when there was an anthrax attack, let's say, on a subway system in a big city—you could lock down that city, make sure that it didn't spread further, get rushed treatment to the people in the affected area. It would be a very limited geographic and temporal event...So, like, they would rush the countermeasures. They had EUA, which is emergency use authorization, which in that situation was important because you rush the treatment to the people in that area even if you don't know that it's definitely going to be effective. It's such a big emergency, biowarfare, bioterrorism—you gotta rush it to the people. There might be some collateral damage. We're in a military situation here. Right? So in a military situation, collateral damage is a whole different consideration than in a civilian framework of public health. "So the civilian framework of public health disappeared. It just got swallowed up by the biodefense framework. And now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world, which is a utterly and completely counter to medicine science and public health."
3:54

🔥HYPER-CRUCIAL INSIGHT🔥 "Fauci was not in charge...He was the public relations face of the policy...The government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council...and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world." (1/5) Debbie Lerman, a 2023 Brownstone (Brownstone Institute) Fellow and retired science writer, describes for FLCCC (Independent Medical Alliance) Senior Fellow Dr. Kat Lindley (Dr. Kat Lindley) how former NIAID head Anthony Fauci **was not in any way in charge of COVID policy.** Instead, Lerman notes that the National Security Council was in charge of COVID policy. While Lerman notes that Fauci is indeed "a terrible person" who should be "on trial," she says that "that's [not] where we should be focusing all of our attention." "The biodefense global public–partnership includes all of the public health agencies and stuff on a national level, but they're not the ones who are in charge," Lerman says. "So they're the ones who are just enacting the policy, and that's where everybody has to be really, really clear: Fauci was not in charge. Please get that out of your mind. We can prosecute him. We can blame him for a lot of things. [But] he didn't make the policy. He didn't come up with the policy, and he didn't enforce the policy. He was the public relations face of the policy. He's a terrible person. [And I] would be happy if he were on trial, but I don't think that's where we should be focusing all of our attention." Lerman goes on to discuss Deborah Birx, who was also on the COVID "Task Force." "Deborah Birx...she came [in as] the representative of the national security state...[And] what I discovered through my research is that the government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council." "And so I just went where my research took me, and, unfortunately, that's where it took me," Lerman adds. "And so I had to go there. And so the National Security Council is defined as the leaders of the military and intelligence arms of government that are advising the President on national security. That's the definition. Now that was the definition before COVID. They changed it. So you have to look at the Wayback Machine to find that definition." Lerman goes on to say: "Now the way they define it is, yes, it's the intelligence and military, but...it's also pandemics, disasters—anything that requires national coordination now is going to be coordinated through the National Security Council. That's scary because...they have expanded the definition of what the National Security Council is supposed to do, and in doing that, they've incorporated public health into what they call a biosecurity framework...[and] the one that they came up with is based on a biodefense response to outbreaks, which is lockdown until vaccine. "What that was supposed to be for, it was supposed to be for when there was an anthrax attack, let's say, on a subway system in a big city—you could lock down that city, make sure that it didn't spread further, get rushed treatment to the people in the affected area. It would be a very limited geographic and temporal event...So, like, they would rush the countermeasures. They had EUA, which is emergency use authorization, which in that situation was important because you rush the treatment to the people in that area even if you don't know that it's definitely going to be effective. It's such a big emergency, biowarfare, bioterrorism—you gotta rush it to the people. There might be some collateral damage. We're in a military situation here. Right? So in a military situation, collateral damage is a whole different consideration than in a civilian framework of public health. "So the civilian framework of public health disappeared. It just got swallowed up by the biodefense framework. And now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world, which is a utterly and completely counter to medicine science and public health."

Sense Receptor

41,169 views • 1 year ago