Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🔥Post Debate: 7 Things The Presidential Candidates Should Know | This Week's Economy Ep. 67 🎙️ 👀Watch and subscribe to get show notes here: #txlege #congress #Debate2024 #podcast #letpeopleprosper #economy Kansas Policy Inst. Mackinac Center American Institute for Economic Research Econlib ATR Pelican Institute Texans for Fiscal Responsibility American...

VanceGinn's profile picture

Vance Ginn

17,275 subscribers

1,786,600 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика#txlege#congress#Debate2024#podcast#letpeopleprosper#economy
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🔥 “THE SPLC IS A HATE GROUP” - Charlie Kirk BIG DAY AS THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER IS INDICTED BY THE FBI. Don’t forget the SPLC actually said said “Designating Antifa a Domestic terror group is DANGEROUS & threatens civil liberties” They ever called BEN CARSON & CHARLIE KIRK EXTREMISTS … while engaging in staged hate crime for PAY. Jack Posobiec reads of a LIST OF WHO THE SPLC CONSIDERS RADICAL RIGHT EXTREMISTS: Ben Carson, The Heritage Foundation, Dennis Prager, Prager U, The Federalist Society, Franklin-Graham, Catholic Medical Association, The Alliance to Sending Freedom,Focus on the Family, American Research Council, Religious Liberty Council, Pacific Justice Institute, Leadership Institute, Ruth Institute, Texas Values, Florida Family Policy Council, The Homeschool Legal Defense Assc., Moms for Liberty, Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles, Daily Wire & TURNING POINT AND THEY ARE SITTING ON A BILLION DOLLARS. Get that POVERTY PALACE.
7:30

🔥 “THE SPLC IS A HATE GROUP” - Charlie Kirk BIG DAY AS THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER IS INDICTED BY THE FBI. Don’t forget the SPLC actually said said “Designating Antifa a Domestic terror group is DANGEROUS & threatens civil liberties” They ever called BEN CARSON & CHARLIE KIRK EXTREMISTS … while engaging in staged hate crime for PAY. Jack Posobiec reads of a LIST OF WHO THE SPLC CONSIDERS RADICAL RIGHT EXTREMISTS: Ben Carson, The Heritage Foundation, Dennis Prager, Prager U, The Federalist Society, Franklin-Graham, Catholic Medical Association, The Alliance to Sending Freedom,Focus on the Family, American Research Council, Religious Liberty Council, Pacific Justice Institute, Leadership Institute, Ruth Institute, Texas Values, Florida Family Policy Council, The Homeschool Legal Defense Assc., Moms for Liberty, Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles, Daily Wire & TURNING POINT AND THEY ARE SITTING ON A BILLION DOLLARS. Get that POVERTY PALACE.

Johnny St.Pete

18,724 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Sarang Shidore: India🇮🇳 is NOT backing down on Russian🇷🇺 oil, and 100% tariffs would only harm the US🇺🇸 economy 'This new move is just another and the latest attempt to try and get India to stop buying Russian oil. In this situation, the attempt was to corner Iran and get it to sign on the dotted line, as they say, but it has spectacularly failed. I think the dilemma of this oil business is that if you stop Russian oil sales, then you actually reduce the amount of oil in the markets and you raise the prices for everybody, including American consumers. And we are in an election cycle here. There is an attempt and then there is a reality. There is a circumvention. And I think what will happen on the ground will be more nuanced and complicated than what is declared in Washington.' -Sarang Shidore, Director of the Global South Program at the Quincy Institute, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇
1:58

Sarang Shidore: India🇮🇳 is NOT backing down on Russian🇷🇺 oil, and 100% tariffs would only harm the US🇺🇸 economy 'This new move is just another and the latest attempt to try and get India to stop buying Russian oil. In this situation, the attempt was to corner Iran and get it to sign on the dotted line, as they say, but it has spectacularly failed. I think the dilemma of this oil business is that if you stop Russian oil sales, then you actually reduce the amount of oil in the markets and you raise the prices for everybody, including American consumers. And we are in an election cycle here. There is an attempt and then there is a reality. There is a circumvention. And I think what will happen on the ground will be more nuanced and complicated than what is declared in Washington.' -Sarang Shidore, Director of the Global South Program at the Quincy Institute, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

64,069 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine has entered its fifth year. The war is a brutal, bloody stalemate and diplomacy appears deadlocked. Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg was President Donald Trump's special envoy to Ukraine until the end of 2025 and is now the co-chair of American security at the America First Policy Institute. Compass Points host Nick Schifrin sat down with Kellogg for an inside look at the Trump administration's strategy for ending the war, how we got here and what's ahead. “It's sort of like an American poker game. If you go all in, the other side doesn't know, do you really have the cards or not? And I think we do, we the United States, have got the cards to force Putin to say, 'Time for you to go home. Time to call it a day, time to end this war,'” Kellogg said. He added that the Russian leader “is not gonna win this war. I don't think he's got the wherewithal to do so." Compass Points from PBS News analyzes prominent international affairs topics and America’s role in a shifting world, breaking down global conflicts, rising tensions, and their implications for U.S. interests. Visit the PBS News website to watch this week's episode.
1:51

Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine has entered its fifth year. The war is a brutal, bloody stalemate and diplomacy appears deadlocked. Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg was President Donald Trump's special envoy to Ukraine until the end of 2025 and is now the co-chair of American security at the America First Policy Institute. Compass Points host Nick Schifrin sat down with Kellogg for an inside look at the Trump administration's strategy for ending the war, how we got here and what's ahead. “It's sort of like an American poker game. If you go all in, the other side doesn't know, do you really have the cards or not? And I think we do, we the United States, have got the cards to force Putin to say, 'Time for you to go home. Time to call it a day, time to end this war,'” Kellogg said. He added that the Russian leader “is not gonna win this war. I don't think he's got the wherewithal to do so." Compass Points from PBS News analyzes prominent international affairs topics and America’s role in a shifting world, breaking down global conflicts, rising tensions, and their implications for U.S. interests. Visit the PBS News website to watch this week's episode.

PBS News

13,412 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

“Almost every single top Chinese biomedical research scientist of note was funded in some part by the NIH. Many were trained in the United States,” NIH director Jay Bhattacharya told me during our recent interview. He says the NIH is now overhauling how it handles foreign research collaborations. The old “sub-award” system—where U.S. institutions funneled money to foreign labs—led to major oversight problems, Bhattacharya says. Under that structure, the U.S. partner was responsible for auditing the foreign collaborator, not the NIH itself. “In the case of Wuhan…EcoHealth Alliance had a sub-award relationship with this Wuhan Institute of Virology, and when all of the pandemic happened…EcoHealth Alliance essentially delayed reporting…and then ultimately said: ‘Oh, well, we don't control Wuhan Institute of Virology. We can't get the lab notebooks.’ That is an unacceptable structure.” “If American taxpayer dollars are going to go to some foreign institution, then we should be confident that we, the Americans, have an auditing relationship that allows us to get access to the kinds of things that we normally have access to for a domestic institution that we fund,” he says. As one of his first decisions as NIH Director, Bhattacharya created a new system that gives the NIH direct oversight of both U.S. and foreign collaborators. This change means the agency can cut off funding if a partner refuses to cooperate. He also introduced two new requirements for any foreign collaboration: – Researchers must show the project would be much more expensive to run in the U.S. – They must show the knowledge gained will directly benefit Americans. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD NIH
5:59

“Almost every single top Chinese biomedical research scientist of note was funded in some part by the NIH. Many were trained in the United States,” NIH director Jay Bhattacharya told me during our recent interview. He says the NIH is now overhauling how it handles foreign research collaborations. The old “sub-award” system—where U.S. institutions funneled money to foreign labs—led to major oversight problems, Bhattacharya says. Under that structure, the U.S. partner was responsible for auditing the foreign collaborator, not the NIH itself. “In the case of Wuhan…EcoHealth Alliance had a sub-award relationship with this Wuhan Institute of Virology, and when all of the pandemic happened…EcoHealth Alliance essentially delayed reporting…and then ultimately said: ‘Oh, well, we don't control Wuhan Institute of Virology. We can't get the lab notebooks.’ That is an unacceptable structure.” “If American taxpayer dollars are going to go to some foreign institution, then we should be confident that we, the Americans, have an auditing relationship that allows us to get access to the kinds of things that we normally have access to for a domestic institution that we fund,” he says. As one of his first decisions as NIH Director, Bhattacharya created a new system that gives the NIH direct oversight of both U.S. and foreign collaborators. This change means the agency can cut off funding if a partner refuses to cooperate. He also introduced two new requirements for any foreign collaboration: – Researchers must show the project would be much more expensive to run in the U.S. – They must show the knowledge gained will directly benefit Americans. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD NIH

Jan Jekielek

12,738 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

David Sacks explains exactly how Dr. Anthony Fauci orchestrated the pandemic and knowingly lied to the American public to protect his own a**. If there is one thing you watch today, this is it. During the The All-In Podcast, Sacks explains how Fauci purposely misled the American public to protect himself. "They knew right away that [Cov*d] came from a lab leak and Fauci and Collins said in emails that they were gonna begin a brutal takedown in order to conceal this fundamental truth of the lab leak from the public." "Now, why would Fauci need to conceal this? Because he had funded gain of function research programs... to conduct gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology." "Fauci was personally responsible for reversing an Obama-era decision to prohibit gain of function research because it was so risky." "[Fauci] funded a gain of function research. He was personally responsible for lifting the ban on gain of function research." "He had a lot of reasons to wanna hide the fact that COVID was engineered in a lab and was lab leak." "Longtime colleague of Fauci and Collins at NIH. Dr. David Morens developed a strategy for evading FOIA requests that would expose the truth." "He did this by deleting government emails, which is a crime by using private email to conduct government business, which is also a crime." "And then strategically misspelling names and titles to frustrate the FOIA searches." To recap: - Fauci aggressively pursued gain-of-function research and was responsible for funding the Wuhan lab while others warned of the dangers. - The virus then leaked from this lab, leading to trillions of dollars in debt which will paralyze our economy for decades into the future, death, su*cides, etc. - Fauci and others were paraded around as heroes. - Trump was ridiculed for pushing the lab leak theory. - Instead of admitting to the lab leak, Fauci and other doctors did all they could to cover it up. - To top it off, many scientists accepted millions of dollars in royalties from the vaccine. You should be furious.
3:16

David Sacks explains exactly how Dr. Anthony Fauci orchestrated the pandemic and knowingly lied to the American public to protect his own a**. If there is one thing you watch today, this is it. During the The All-In Podcast, Sacks explains how Fauci purposely misled the American public to protect himself. "They knew right away that [Cov*d] came from a lab leak and Fauci and Collins said in emails that they were gonna begin a brutal takedown in order to conceal this fundamental truth of the lab leak from the public." "Now, why would Fauci need to conceal this? Because he had funded gain of function research programs... to conduct gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology." "Fauci was personally responsible for reversing an Obama-era decision to prohibit gain of function research because it was so risky." "[Fauci] funded a gain of function research. He was personally responsible for lifting the ban on gain of function research." "He had a lot of reasons to wanna hide the fact that COVID was engineered in a lab and was lab leak." "Longtime colleague of Fauci and Collins at NIH. Dr. David Morens developed a strategy for evading FOIA requests that would expose the truth." "He did this by deleting government emails, which is a crime by using private email to conduct government business, which is also a crime." "And then strategically misspelling names and titles to frustrate the FOIA searches." To recap: - Fauci aggressively pursued gain-of-function research and was responsible for funding the Wuhan lab while others warned of the dangers. - The virus then leaked from this lab, leading to trillions of dollars in debt which will paralyze our economy for decades into the future, death, su*cides, etc. - Fauci and others were paraded around as heroes. - Trump was ridiculed for pushing the lab leak theory. - Instead of admitting to the lab leak, Fauci and other doctors did all they could to cover it up. - To top it off, many scientists accepted millions of dollars in royalties from the vaccine. You should be furious.

Collin Rugg

1,867,755 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨Sen. Rand Paul details one of MANY lies Anthony Fauci told the public: "On May 11, 2021, you told the Senate the NIH has never, ever, and does not now fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. When I gave you the opportunity to correct the record to reconsider the statement, you responded that you had never before lied to Congress. We were then told that only the government's narrowest regulation of definition counted here. That you could define gain-of-function in one way in which this was not gain-of-function, in which all of the common sense of the world be thrown out [...] But the real question is, was it dangerous? Was it a wise decision to fund this? And you haven't deviated from that. You've never admitted that it could have been a mistake, running this research in China. The American people were not asking for a semantics debate over what is gain-of-function. They were asking, does common sense say this research was dangerous in Wuhan? They wanted to know whether their money funded experiments in Wuhan that made bad coronavirus' better able to infect humans. The answer is, yes."
1:22

🚨Sen. Rand Paul details one of MANY lies Anthony Fauci told the public: "On May 11, 2021, you told the Senate the NIH has never, ever, and does not now fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. When I gave you the opportunity to correct the record to reconsider the statement, you responded that you had never before lied to Congress. We were then told that only the government's narrowest regulation of definition counted here. That you could define gain-of-function in one way in which this was not gain-of-function, in which all of the common sense of the world be thrown out [...] But the real question is, was it dangerous? Was it a wise decision to fund this? And you haven't deviated from that. You've never admitted that it could have been a mistake, running this research in China. The American people were not asking for a semantics debate over what is gain-of-function. They were asking, does common sense say this research was dangerous in Wuhan? They wanted to know whether their money funded experiments in Wuhan that made bad coronavirus' better able to infect humans. The answer is, yes."

Townhall.com

28,401 просмотров • 21 дней назад

The day after the United States and Israel began the war with Iran, President Donald Trump said the strikes would last four to five weeks. Now, as the war begins its fourth week, it appears there is no end in sight. Iran's regime is severely weakened, but is still retaliating against Israel and its Gulf neighbors. The Strait of Hormuz is largely closed, leaving oil prices spiking. Trump's top counterterrorism official resigned in protest to the war. In an escalation of the war, Israel struck Iran’s South Pars gas field this week, prompting Iran to retaliate by attacking energy infrastructure for neighboring countries in the region. The South Pars field in the Persian Gulf is Iran’s biggest source of domestic energy and the largest gas field in the world. Following the strike, Trump said in a Truth Social post Wednesday night that Israel acted alone and that “the United States knew nothing about this particular attack.” Michael Doran, who served on President George W. Bush's National Security Council staff, doubts the president's message. “Of course he knew about it,” Doran, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, told host Nick Schifrin. “He's saying he didn't know about in order to protect his escalation option.” Dana Stroll, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East during the Biden administration, shared that she had a different view. “I think that Trump had to back down,” Stroll, who is now the director of research at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said. “The U.S. and Israeli military operations are so joint at this point, there's no way in which that South Pars Israeli strike would have happened without the U.S. military knowing.” “Why did he back down so fast? I think because he wasn't prepared for how fast the Iranians escalated,” Stroll added. Compass Points from PBS News analyzes prominent international affairs topics and America’s role in a shifting world, breaking down global conflicts, rising tensions, and their implications for U.S. interests. Visit the PBS News website to watch this week's episode.
2:35

The day after the United States and Israel began the war with Iran, President Donald Trump said the strikes would last four to five weeks. Now, as the war begins its fourth week, it appears there is no end in sight. Iran's regime is severely weakened, but is still retaliating against Israel and its Gulf neighbors. The Strait of Hormuz is largely closed, leaving oil prices spiking. Trump's top counterterrorism official resigned in protest to the war. In an escalation of the war, Israel struck Iran’s South Pars gas field this week, prompting Iran to retaliate by attacking energy infrastructure for neighboring countries in the region. The South Pars field in the Persian Gulf is Iran’s biggest source of domestic energy and the largest gas field in the world. Following the strike, Trump said in a Truth Social post Wednesday night that Israel acted alone and that “the United States knew nothing about this particular attack.” Michael Doran, who served on President George W. Bush's National Security Council staff, doubts the president's message. “Of course he knew about it,” Doran, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, told host Nick Schifrin. “He's saying he didn't know about in order to protect his escalation option.” Dana Stroll, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East during the Biden administration, shared that she had a different view. “I think that Trump had to back down,” Stroll, who is now the director of research at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said. “The U.S. and Israeli military operations are so joint at this point, there's no way in which that South Pars Israeli strike would have happened without the U.S. military knowing.” “Why did he back down so fast? I think because he wasn't prepared for how fast the Iranians escalated,” Stroll added. Compass Points from PBS News analyzes prominent international affairs topics and America’s role in a shifting world, breaking down global conflicts, rising tensions, and their implications for U.S. interests. Visit the PBS News website to watch this week's episode.

PBS News

14,757 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

EXCLUSIVE 🚨 Harvard Jihadi Exposed The Grooming of Abdullah Akl by Imam Tom Facchine and the Islamic Network Behind Him RAIR Foundation has been warning about Abdullah Akl for a very long time — and now, tragically, we’ve been proven right, again! The man calling for acts of terrorism on American soil has been identified as Harvard graduate student Abdullah Akl — a protégé of Imam Tom Facchine, a Yaqeen Institute figure who proudly platformed and mentored him in public interviews. The very same Tom Facchine, who collaborates with Texas radical Imam Yasir Qadhi in Texas and has positioned himself as a “mainstream” Muslim voice, while quietly nurturing a new generation of Islamic revolutionaries. Tom even works with Dr. Tareq Al-Suwaidan, who is banned from entering the United States due to his promotion of jihad, antisemitic incitement, and open support for Hamas. Tom works with this BANNED Muslim Brotherhood figure and TRAINS activists in conferences held in Islamic Countries outside of Law Enforcement's reach... WAS Abdullah Akl at one of these training programs in Turkey or Malaysia!? LEARN ABOUT IS HERE: 🔥 The Grooming Ground: How Imam Tom Facchine Helped to Build Abdullah Akl In a 2024 RAIR Foundation USA exposé — “America in the Crosshairs: Imam Facchine’s Plot to Silence Dissent and Build an Islamic Army to Impose Sharia” — we documented Facchine’s strategic campaign to radicalize young Muslims under the guise of “activism.” (See here: Facchine used his platform to celebrate radicals like Abdullah Akl, calling him “the new generation of Muslim activists.” Akl, in turn, openly declared that his mission — through groups like Within Our Lifetime (WOL) and the Muslim American Society (MAS) Mosque in State Island— was to “Islamify” political activism and fuse religious dogma with militant disruption. “The Islamification of the Palestinian movement is Palestinian resistance,” Akl said. “We will not stop for anything less than liberation… from the river to the sea.” This was no accident. It was a carefully cultivated ideological grooming — endorsed, platformed, and legitimized by a U.S. imam with deep institutional ties and terror ties. 🧠 The Radical Incubator: Harvard, Yaqeen Institute, MAS Staten Island Center, and the Islamic Pipeline Harvard continues to harbor extremist ideologues who mask jihadist ambitions as “activism.” Akl is not a lone voice — he is the product of a well-funded ideological ecosystem spanning elite academia, Islamic institutions, and foreign-influenced “advocacy” groups. At the center of this ecosystem is Tom Facchine, a Yaqeen Institute imam who regularly promotes figures like Yasir Qadhi, Omar Suleiman, and Linda Sarsour — all of whom have defended Hamas or sought to normalize Islamic political power in the West. These same networks sanction radicalization under the banner of “justice,” weaponizing Western freedoms to build the very infrastructure that undermines them. ⚠️ The Warning Ignored RAIR has been warning Tom Facchine’s movement was building an Islamic army within the West — a generation taught not to integrate but to confront. We exposed the blueprint: fuse religious indoctrination with political agitation recruit through mosques and student groups frame Western resistance as oppression and demand “disruption” of daily life until Islamic goals are achieved Now, the fruit of that campaign is visible: a Harvard-trained activist openly calling for terrorism in America, while his mentors remain celebrated as “moderate scholars.” 🧨 The Network of Enablers Let’s be clear: MAS Staten Island Mosque and Imam Tom Facchine provided Akl legitimacy and mentorship. Yaqeen Institute offered him ideological cover. Within Our Lifetime gave him the activist platform. And Harvard University provided him the prestige and protection to radicalize under the banner of academia. Every one of them bears responsibility for cultivating this threat — and every one of them must be held accountable. 🗣️ RAIR’s Call to Action The United States cannot continue allowing taxpayer-funded institutions and visa-protected networks to train, empower, and platform jihadist ideologues. It’s time for: Federal investigation into the financial and organizational ties between Yaqeen Institute, MAS Staten Island, Within Our Lifetime, and groups linked to foreign Islamic movements. Congressional inquiry into Harvard’s role in enabling radical activism under the guise of “social justice.” Public exposure of every cleric, donor, and institution that has built or defended the Abdullah Akls of the world. RAIR Foundation USA sounded the alarm. The evidence is now undeniable. The question is — will our leaders finally act before the next Abdullah Akl moves from threats to action?
27:44

EXCLUSIVE 🚨 Harvard Jihadi Exposed The Grooming of Abdullah Akl by Imam Tom Facchine and the Islamic Network Behind Him RAIR Foundation has been warning about Abdullah Akl for a very long time — and now, tragically, we’ve been proven right, again! The man calling for acts of terrorism on American soil has been identified as Harvard graduate student Abdullah Akl — a protégé of Imam Tom Facchine, a Yaqeen Institute figure who proudly platformed and mentored him in public interviews. The very same Tom Facchine, who collaborates with Texas radical Imam Yasir Qadhi in Texas and has positioned himself as a “mainstream” Muslim voice, while quietly nurturing a new generation of Islamic revolutionaries. Tom even works with Dr. Tareq Al-Suwaidan, who is banned from entering the United States due to his promotion of jihad, antisemitic incitement, and open support for Hamas. Tom works with this BANNED Muslim Brotherhood figure and TRAINS activists in conferences held in Islamic Countries outside of Law Enforcement's reach... WAS Abdullah Akl at one of these training programs in Turkey or Malaysia!? LEARN ABOUT IS HERE: 🔥 The Grooming Ground: How Imam Tom Facchine Helped to Build Abdullah Akl In a 2024 RAIR Foundation USA exposé — “America in the Crosshairs: Imam Facchine’s Plot to Silence Dissent and Build an Islamic Army to Impose Sharia” — we documented Facchine’s strategic campaign to radicalize young Muslims under the guise of “activism.” (See here: Facchine used his platform to celebrate radicals like Abdullah Akl, calling him “the new generation of Muslim activists.” Akl, in turn, openly declared that his mission — through groups like Within Our Lifetime (WOL) and the Muslim American Society (MAS) Mosque in State Island— was to “Islamify” political activism and fuse religious dogma with militant disruption. “The Islamification of the Palestinian movement is Palestinian resistance,” Akl said. “We will not stop for anything less than liberation… from the river to the sea.” This was no accident. It was a carefully cultivated ideological grooming — endorsed, platformed, and legitimized by a U.S. imam with deep institutional ties and terror ties. 🧠 The Radical Incubator: Harvard, Yaqeen Institute, MAS Staten Island Center, and the Islamic Pipeline Harvard continues to harbor extremist ideologues who mask jihadist ambitions as “activism.” Akl is not a lone voice — he is the product of a well-funded ideological ecosystem spanning elite academia, Islamic institutions, and foreign-influenced “advocacy” groups. At the center of this ecosystem is Tom Facchine, a Yaqeen Institute imam who regularly promotes figures like Yasir Qadhi, Omar Suleiman, and Linda Sarsour — all of whom have defended Hamas or sought to normalize Islamic political power in the West. These same networks sanction radicalization under the banner of “justice,” weaponizing Western freedoms to build the very infrastructure that undermines them. ⚠️ The Warning Ignored RAIR has been warning Tom Facchine’s movement was building an Islamic army within the West — a generation taught not to integrate but to confront. We exposed the blueprint: fuse religious indoctrination with political agitation recruit through mosques and student groups frame Western resistance as oppression and demand “disruption” of daily life until Islamic goals are achieved Now, the fruit of that campaign is visible: a Harvard-trained activist openly calling for terrorism in America, while his mentors remain celebrated as “moderate scholars.” 🧨 The Network of Enablers Let’s be clear: MAS Staten Island Mosque and Imam Tom Facchine provided Akl legitimacy and mentorship. Yaqeen Institute offered him ideological cover. Within Our Lifetime gave him the activist platform. And Harvard University provided him the prestige and protection to radicalize under the banner of academia. Every one of them bears responsibility for cultivating this threat — and every one of them must be held accountable. 🗣️ RAIR’s Call to Action The United States cannot continue allowing taxpayer-funded institutions and visa-protected networks to train, empower, and platform jihadist ideologues. It’s time for: Federal investigation into the financial and organizational ties between Yaqeen Institute, MAS Staten Island, Within Our Lifetime, and groups linked to foreign Islamic movements. Congressional inquiry into Harvard’s role in enabling radical activism under the guise of “social justice.” Public exposure of every cleric, donor, and institution that has built or defended the Abdullah Akls of the world. RAIR Foundation USA sounded the alarm. The evidence is now undeniable. The question is — will our leaders finally act before the next Abdullah Akl moves from threats to action?

Amy Mek

243,583 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Articles of Impeachment Filed Against Rogue Judge Boasberg | Matt Margolis, PJ Media Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) will formally introduce articles of impeachment against radical left-wing U.S. District Judge James Boasberg for what he calls the judge’s “corrupt and unethical” role in the so-called Arctic Frost investigation. "Chief Judge Boasberg has compromised the impartiality of the judiciary and created a constitutional crisis. He is shamelessly weaponizing his power against his political opponents, including Republican members of Congress who are faithfully serving the American people within their jurisdiction," Gill told Fox News Digital. “Judge Boasberg was an accomplice in the egregious Arctic Frost scandal where he equipped the Biden DOJ to spy on Republican senators. His lack of integrity makes him clearly unfit for the gavel. I am proud to once again introduce articles of impeachment against Judge Boasberg to hold him accountable for his high crimes and misdemeanors." The articles of impeachment accuses Boasberg of authorizing unconstitutional subpoenas and nondisclosure orders as part of the FBI’s Arctic Frost probe, which, of course, was signed off by Special Counsel Jack Smith. These orders targeted Republican members of Congress—including Sens. Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, and Marsha Blackburn—while they were engaged in their official legislative duties, violating Article I protections. Boasberg is also accused of allowing the DOJ to bar AT&T from informing Senator Cruz about a subpoena for his records for at least a year, citing baseless claims that Cruz might destroy evidence or intimidate witnesses. The resolution argues Boasberg’s actions directly violated 2 U.S.C. § 6628, which protects Senate offices from such secret orders. The resolution further alleges that Boasberg enabled politically motivated subpoenas against conservative organizations like the Conservative Partnership Institute and America First Policy Institute, as well as individuals such as Jeffrey Clark, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and Jenna Ellis—suggesting the court was weaponized to suppress political opponents. The resolution concludes that Boasberg’s conduct demonstrates a “pattern of impropriety” and a failure to uphold constitutional limits, making him unfit to serve and warranting removal from office. Amen! Boasberg has faced mounting criticism for months over his blatantly partisan injunctions against the Trump administration—rulings that many legal experts say have no constitutional foundation. Previous attempts to rein in his judicial overreach and impeach Boasberg earlier this year fizzled out, but this latest effort has real momentum behind it. “Judge Boasberg, who was entrusted to sit on the bench, to be impartial and to be nonpolitical, and to basically, um, um, review cases in front of him and determine the constitutionality and the legality of the claims in front of him, he has taken it on his own to be a hyper-partisan judge, going after Republicans, signing off on subpoenas that are unlawful, and he signed off on them just to get his political rivals,” Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) said at a press conference Tuesday. “This is why he needs to be impeached. I commend Congressman Brandon Gill of Texas for leading this effort in the House, to call for articles of impeachment of Judge Boasberg.” The judiciary was never meant to be a playground for partisan power. Congress has not only the right but the obligation to act. This is a test of whether America’s institutions will defend fairness—or protect corruption that hides behind a robe and a gavel. The House must stand firm and remind the nation that no one, not even a judge, is above accountability. Read more:
1:13

BREAKING: Articles of Impeachment Filed Against Rogue Judge Boasberg | Matt Margolis, PJ Media Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) will formally introduce articles of impeachment against radical left-wing U.S. District Judge James Boasberg for what he calls the judge’s “corrupt and unethical” role in the so-called Arctic Frost investigation. "Chief Judge Boasberg has compromised the impartiality of the judiciary and created a constitutional crisis. He is shamelessly weaponizing his power against his political opponents, including Republican members of Congress who are faithfully serving the American people within their jurisdiction," Gill told Fox News Digital. “Judge Boasberg was an accomplice in the egregious Arctic Frost scandal where he equipped the Biden DOJ to spy on Republican senators. His lack of integrity makes him clearly unfit for the gavel. I am proud to once again introduce articles of impeachment against Judge Boasberg to hold him accountable for his high crimes and misdemeanors." The articles of impeachment accuses Boasberg of authorizing unconstitutional subpoenas and nondisclosure orders as part of the FBI’s Arctic Frost probe, which, of course, was signed off by Special Counsel Jack Smith. These orders targeted Republican members of Congress—including Sens. Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, and Marsha Blackburn—while they were engaged in their official legislative duties, violating Article I protections. Boasberg is also accused of allowing the DOJ to bar AT&T from informing Senator Cruz about a subpoena for his records for at least a year, citing baseless claims that Cruz might destroy evidence or intimidate witnesses. The resolution argues Boasberg’s actions directly violated 2 U.S.C. § 6628, which protects Senate offices from such secret orders. The resolution further alleges that Boasberg enabled politically motivated subpoenas against conservative organizations like the Conservative Partnership Institute and America First Policy Institute, as well as individuals such as Jeffrey Clark, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and Jenna Ellis—suggesting the court was weaponized to suppress political opponents. The resolution concludes that Boasberg’s conduct demonstrates a “pattern of impropriety” and a failure to uphold constitutional limits, making him unfit to serve and warranting removal from office. Amen! Boasberg has faced mounting criticism for months over his blatantly partisan injunctions against the Trump administration—rulings that many legal experts say have no constitutional foundation. Previous attempts to rein in his judicial overreach and impeach Boasberg earlier this year fizzled out, but this latest effort has real momentum behind it. “Judge Boasberg, who was entrusted to sit on the bench, to be impartial and to be nonpolitical, and to basically, um, um, review cases in front of him and determine the constitutionality and the legality of the claims in front of him, he has taken it on his own to be a hyper-partisan judge, going after Republicans, signing off on subpoenas that are unlawful, and he signed off on them just to get his political rivals,” Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) said at a press conference Tuesday. “This is why he needs to be impeached. I commend Congressman Brandon Gill of Texas for leading this effort in the House, to call for articles of impeachment of Judge Boasberg.” The judiciary was never meant to be a playground for partisan power. Congress has not only the right but the obligation to act. This is a test of whether America’s institutions will defend fairness—or protect corruption that hides behind a robe and a gavel. The House must stand firm and remind the nation that no one, not even a judge, is above accountability. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

42,693 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨THREAT ALERT AMERICA! MILITARY VETERAN RISES UP! HERO JAMES REID FOUGHT FOR AMERICA OVERSEAS- NOW HE'S FIGHTING TO SAVE HIS HOMETOWN FROM ISLAMIZATION LaSalle County, Illinois. A quiet rural area. A former Holiday Inn resort on 165 acres in Sheridan. A Pakistani imam named Jamil Ahmed Sukhera (founder of Vairt / V Resort Living) wants to turn it into a $400 million gated Muslim enclave - complete with its own mosque, school, halal economy, waterpark, golf, and everything so residents "truly never have to leave" into American society. He’s marketing it worldwide to foreign Muslims. He runs a visa company (Vmigrant) that funnels people and money into the U.S. He openly talks in Urdu interviews about the "next war is of the merchants" - spreading Islam through business and economic power, not armies. He brags about building an "Ummah-wide system" and turning American soil into a base for the next generation of Muslim billionaires who will "lead the world ethically" (under Sharia, in his context). 🚨His other property? A potential National Security Threat! A retreat in Waynesboro, Pennsylvania - right beside America’s "underground Pentagon" (Raven Rock Mountain Complex), the top-secret nuclear bunker where our leaders would hide in a war. This is happening. Right now. In the heartland. 💥Enter James Reid - a true American hero. Marine Corps veteran. Served in the Middle East. Saw Sharia law in action with his own eyes. Former San Francisco police officer. Now a LaSalle County Board member. At the June 8th board meeting, in front of a packed room, he said what almost no elected official has the guts to say anymore: “The original pamphlet that went out very clearly stated that this would be a gated, fenced community operated under strict Sharia. I don’t know about anybody else in this room. I served three years in the Middle East. That is not conducive to the Constitution of the United States. My worry about this is that these gentlemen standing behind me, or anybody else in LaSalle County law enforcement, will be called to that facility and not allowed through the gate. I have had the experience of seeing how Sharia works. I have seen people stoned to death. I have seen women beaten in the street just for being women, and I will not allow this in this county. I don’t care. This will not happen in LaSalle County.” He didn’t stutter. He didn’t apologize. He stood for the Constitution, for American women and girls, and for the rule of law. And what happened next? The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) - the same organization designated in Florida and Texas as a TERRORIST ORGANISATION.....immediately rushed in to demand he be censured. They called his factual, experience-based warning “Islamophobic.” They demanded the board punish a VETERAN for protecting his community. This is the audacity of the machine. They want to build parallel societies on our soil. They want to import people who reject assimilation. They want to silence the few patriots left who still have the spine to say: “Not in my county. Not on my watch.” James Reid is not the problem. James Reid is the solution. He is the kind of man this country was built on - men who’ve seen the darkness of Sharia up close and refuse to let it take root here. To every American who still loves this country: Stand with James Reid. Show up to EVERY SINGLE LaSalle County Board meeting. Demand full transparency on the financing, the foreign investors, and the real plans for this property. Support every patriot willing to speak the truth before it’s too late. This is about OUR survival as a NATION! Sharia has no place in America. Gated foreign enclaves that operate as mini-caliphates have no place in America. And organizations that attack veterans for telling the truth have no place dictating our future. James Reid - you are MY hero. READ OUT FULL REPORT - WHERE IS OUR GOVERNMENT!?
2:51

🚨THREAT ALERT AMERICA! MILITARY VETERAN RISES UP! HERO JAMES REID FOUGHT FOR AMERICA OVERSEAS- NOW HE'S FIGHTING TO SAVE HIS HOMETOWN FROM ISLAMIZATION LaSalle County, Illinois. A quiet rural area. A former Holiday Inn resort on 165 acres in Sheridan. A Pakistani imam named Jamil Ahmed Sukhera (founder of Vairt / V Resort Living) wants to turn it into a $400 million gated Muslim enclave - complete with its own mosque, school, halal economy, waterpark, golf, and everything so residents "truly never have to leave" into American society. He’s marketing it worldwide to foreign Muslims. He runs a visa company (Vmigrant) that funnels people and money into the U.S. He openly talks in Urdu interviews about the "next war is of the merchants" - spreading Islam through business and economic power, not armies. He brags about building an "Ummah-wide system" and turning American soil into a base for the next generation of Muslim billionaires who will "lead the world ethically" (under Sharia, in his context). 🚨His other property? A potential National Security Threat! A retreat in Waynesboro, Pennsylvania - right beside America’s "underground Pentagon" (Raven Rock Mountain Complex), the top-secret nuclear bunker where our leaders would hide in a war. This is happening. Right now. In the heartland. 💥Enter James Reid - a true American hero. Marine Corps veteran. Served in the Middle East. Saw Sharia law in action with his own eyes. Former San Francisco police officer. Now a LaSalle County Board member. At the June 8th board meeting, in front of a packed room, he said what almost no elected official has the guts to say anymore: “The original pamphlet that went out very clearly stated that this would be a gated, fenced community operated under strict Sharia. I don’t know about anybody else in this room. I served three years in the Middle East. That is not conducive to the Constitution of the United States. My worry about this is that these gentlemen standing behind me, or anybody else in LaSalle County law enforcement, will be called to that facility and not allowed through the gate. I have had the experience of seeing how Sharia works. I have seen people stoned to death. I have seen women beaten in the street just for being women, and I will not allow this in this county. I don’t care. This will not happen in LaSalle County.” He didn’t stutter. He didn’t apologize. He stood for the Constitution, for American women and girls, and for the rule of law. And what happened next? The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) - the same organization designated in Florida and Texas as a TERRORIST ORGANISATION.....immediately rushed in to demand he be censured. They called his factual, experience-based warning “Islamophobic.” They demanded the board punish a VETERAN for protecting his community. This is the audacity of the machine. They want to build parallel societies on our soil. They want to import people who reject assimilation. They want to silence the few patriots left who still have the spine to say: “Not in my county. Not on my watch.” James Reid is not the problem. James Reid is the solution. He is the kind of man this country was built on - men who’ve seen the darkness of Sharia up close and refuse to let it take root here. To every American who still loves this country: Stand with James Reid. Show up to EVERY SINGLE LaSalle County Board meeting. Demand full transparency on the financing, the foreign investors, and the real plans for this property. Support every patriot willing to speak the truth before it’s too late. This is about OUR survival as a NATION! Sharia has no place in America. Gated foreign enclaves that operate as mini-caliphates have no place in America. And organizations that attack veterans for telling the truth have no place dictating our future. James Reid - you are MY hero. READ OUT FULL REPORT - WHERE IS OUR GOVERNMENT!?

Amy Mek

186,798 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This is perhaps the most important and powerful case against AUKUS that I've heard, especially because it comes from one of Australia's preeminent strategic thinkers: Hugh White, inaugural Director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) and former Deputy Secretary for Strategy and Intelligence in the Australian Department of Defence. Here's what he says: - White argues that the era of Anglo-Saxon (British and American) dominance in the Western Pacific is ending. He states: "We are facing one of the, perhaps the biggest transformation in our shared international setting since European settlement." This transformation is driven by China's rise as an economic and military power comparable to the United States. - As a result he argues that there's no alternative to treating China as an equal partner: "Nobody really knows what America's aim in Asia is. But one thing's for sure, nobody in Washington thinks they should treat China as an equal partner. And my basic argument to my many friends in Washington is that if they don't treat China as an equal partner, then they're going to be taking on a rivalry with China that I don't think they can win." - He emphasizes this point repeatedly, arguing that given China's economic and military power, especially in the Western Pacific, the U.S. cannot maintain its previous position of uncontested primacy: "I don't see how, in an era where China's economy is as big as America's, in an era where its military power in the West Pacific is really quite comparable to America's, in an era where China is increasingly potent as a nuclear armed power, the US and China can find a way to get on in which the United States doesn't, at the very least, treat China as an equal partner." - White sees AUKUS as problematic because it aligns Australia (and potentially New Zealand) with a U.S. strategy that refuses to acknowledge this new reality. He argues that by supporting AUKUS, these countries are effectively endorsing a primacy approach that is "not a smart way to go" and risks destroying both their prosperity and their security, because they'll "only be prosperous and secure if the United States and China can find a way to get on." - On the economic benefits arguably brought by AUKUS: "The idea that you buy those economic benefits at the price of committing yourself to support an approach to this really fundamental question about the shape of our future order in Asia, which I don't think is going to work, that would be a very high price to pay for a very doubtful benefit."
7:53

This is perhaps the most important and powerful case against AUKUS that I've heard, especially because it comes from one of Australia's preeminent strategic thinkers: Hugh White, inaugural Director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) and former Deputy Secretary for Strategy and Intelligence in the Australian Department of Defence. Here's what he says: - White argues that the era of Anglo-Saxon (British and American) dominance in the Western Pacific is ending. He states: "We are facing one of the, perhaps the biggest transformation in our shared international setting since European settlement." This transformation is driven by China's rise as an economic and military power comparable to the United States. - As a result he argues that there's no alternative to treating China as an equal partner: "Nobody really knows what America's aim in Asia is. But one thing's for sure, nobody in Washington thinks they should treat China as an equal partner. And my basic argument to my many friends in Washington is that if they don't treat China as an equal partner, then they're going to be taking on a rivalry with China that I don't think they can win." - He emphasizes this point repeatedly, arguing that given China's economic and military power, especially in the Western Pacific, the U.S. cannot maintain its previous position of uncontested primacy: "I don't see how, in an era where China's economy is as big as America's, in an era where its military power in the West Pacific is really quite comparable to America's, in an era where China is increasingly potent as a nuclear armed power, the US and China can find a way to get on in which the United States doesn't, at the very least, treat China as an equal partner." - White sees AUKUS as problematic because it aligns Australia (and potentially New Zealand) with a U.S. strategy that refuses to acknowledge this new reality. He argues that by supporting AUKUS, these countries are effectively endorsing a primacy approach that is "not a smart way to go" and risks destroying both their prosperity and their security, because they'll "only be prosperous and secure if the United States and China can find a way to get on." - On the economic benefits arguably brought by AUKUS: "The idea that you buy those economic benefits at the price of committing yourself to support an approach to this really fundamental question about the shape of our future order in Asia, which I don't think is going to work, that would be a very high price to pay for a very doubtful benefit."

Arnaud Bertrand

395,098 просмотров • 2 лет назад

President Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute on the Johnny Carson show, 1/3/1975. This aired shortly after he finished his 2nd term as the Governor of California. In this segment, President Reagan talks about various issues of the federal government. He describes the federal government as being its own legislative body (which is unconstitutional), that creates regulations (laws). He also explains how taxing people more, does not solve inflation. Furthermore, he delved into the thousands of useless government grants that are a burden to the taxpayer, and informs everyone that the government is the problem. In my opinion, Donald J. Trump’s government reduction (drain the swamp) and fiscal responsibility aspirations, are extremely reminiscent of what President Reagan expressed here. (This is prior to him becoming president) If nothing else, I hope you learn something; as our corrupt government is a lot worse now, then it was then. Based on this video, it seems like people have been programmed to be oblivious to what’s actually happening, and if they aren’t oblivious, they’re programmed not to care about the actual issues. Because if they weren’t programmed, our country wouldn’t have come to such a low point. We are currently the laughing stock of the world. We are the sheep to the bureaucrats who want to dictate our every move, and keep us fighting each other for scraps, while they bask in our misery and hard work. They have invented issues, and other false narratives, to enslave us. While we’re busy fighting each other (unbeknownst to us) on false pretenses, they’re busy eating away at our rights, destroying our country, and the foundation of what makes us American. We have left our eye off the ball for far too long, and now they’ve changed the game. We must take back what is ours, before there’s nothing left to take back. #USA #MakeAmericaGreatAgain #MakeAmericaHealthyAgain #ProudToBeAmerican #FightFightFight
23:46

President Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute on the Johnny Carson show, 1/3/1975. This aired shortly after he finished his 2nd term as the Governor of California. In this segment, President Reagan talks about various issues of the federal government. He describes the federal government as being its own legislative body (which is unconstitutional), that creates regulations (laws). He also explains how taxing people more, does not solve inflation. Furthermore, he delved into the thousands of useless government grants that are a burden to the taxpayer, and informs everyone that the government is the problem. In my opinion, Donald J. Trump’s government reduction (drain the swamp) and fiscal responsibility aspirations, are extremely reminiscent of what President Reagan expressed here. (This is prior to him becoming president) If nothing else, I hope you learn something; as our corrupt government is a lot worse now, then it was then. Based on this video, it seems like people have been programmed to be oblivious to what’s actually happening, and if they aren’t oblivious, they’re programmed not to care about the actual issues. Because if they weren’t programmed, our country wouldn’t have come to such a low point. We are currently the laughing stock of the world. We are the sheep to the bureaucrats who want to dictate our every move, and keep us fighting each other for scraps, while they bask in our misery and hard work. They have invented issues, and other false narratives, to enslave us. While we’re busy fighting each other (unbeknownst to us) on false pretenses, they’re busy eating away at our rights, destroying our country, and the foundation of what makes us American. We have left our eye off the ball for far too long, and now they’ve changed the game. We must take back what is ours, before there’s nothing left to take back. #USA #MakeAmericaGreatAgain #MakeAmericaHealthyAgain #ProudToBeAmerican #FightFightFight

Reliable Brain 🇺🇸

10,434 просмотров • 1 год назад

****** The Best 9/11 WTC Explosive Evidence in 30-Min. — Richard Gage, AIA, Architect [Slides Restored!] ****** Building 7 and the Twin Towers | Do you know what really happened? ****** I delivered one of two dozen presentations at Turning the Tide — the 24th 9/11 truth anniversary conference in Washington DC, September 2025. Originally, there were no slides recorded due to glitches. Now they have all been fully restored thanks to Barbara Honegger and Mark Snyder. So, this is the best 30-minute presentation on the subject anywhere. We stuffed 90-minutes of powerful explosive evidence into a 30-minute speaking slot! The best is there. Share it widely with your skeptical friends — this is their best shot to “get it.” Don’t deprive them of the opportunity. It's the body of proof that has convinced more than 3,600 architects & engineers to publicly demand a new 9/11 WTC investigation! We will post an article for each of the two dozen incredible presentations, all newly-restored, to this email list — as well as on the Turning the Tide conference website for you to review. ****** San Francisco Bay area architect Richard Gage, AIA, is a member of the American Institute of Architects and founder & former CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. He now leads the charge for a new World Trade Center investigation along with his courageous wife Gail at RichardGage911. Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the WTC high-rises after hearing the startling conclusions of a reluctant 9/11 researcher, David Ray Griffin, on the radio in 2006, which launched his own unyielding quest for the truth about 9/11. The organization he founded, AE911Truth, now numbers more than 3,600 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation into the explosive destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings on 9/11. As an architect, he has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed steel-framed buildings. Most recently, he worked on the construction documents for a $400M mixed-use urban project with 1.2 million square feet of retail, parking structure, and mid-rise office space — altogether about 1,200 tons of steel framing. Please welcome Richard Gage, AIA, Architect.
30:19

****** The Best 9/11 WTC Explosive Evidence in 30-Min. — Richard Gage, AIA, Architect [Slides Restored!] ****** Building 7 and the Twin Towers | Do you know what really happened? ****** I delivered one of two dozen presentations at Turning the Tide — the 24th 9/11 truth anniversary conference in Washington DC, September 2025. Originally, there were no slides recorded due to glitches. Now they have all been fully restored thanks to Barbara Honegger and Mark Snyder. So, this is the best 30-minute presentation on the subject anywhere. We stuffed 90-minutes of powerful explosive evidence into a 30-minute speaking slot! The best is there. Share it widely with your skeptical friends — this is their best shot to “get it.” Don’t deprive them of the opportunity. It's the body of proof that has convinced more than 3,600 architects & engineers to publicly demand a new 9/11 WTC investigation! We will post an article for each of the two dozen incredible presentations, all newly-restored, to this email list — as well as on the Turning the Tide conference website for you to review. ****** San Francisco Bay area architect Richard Gage, AIA, is a member of the American Institute of Architects and founder & former CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. He now leads the charge for a new World Trade Center investigation along with his courageous wife Gail at RichardGage911. Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the WTC high-rises after hearing the startling conclusions of a reluctant 9/11 researcher, David Ray Griffin, on the radio in 2006, which launched his own unyielding quest for the truth about 9/11. The organization he founded, AE911Truth, now numbers more than 3,600 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation into the explosive destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings on 9/11. As an architect, he has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed steel-framed buildings. Most recently, he worked on the construction documents for a $400M mixed-use urban project with 1.2 million square feet of retail, parking structure, and mid-rise office space — altogether about 1,200 tons of steel framing. Please welcome Richard Gage, AIA, Architect.

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

11,398 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"Have you seen any evidence of DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS use, here on American soil?" "There are several instances of individuals being hit in what appears to be both sonic energy and forms of rapidly pulsed microwave energy, domestically. Some cases in Florida, some cases in the Delaware, Maryland, DC area, and some cases on the West Coast as well." - Dr. James Giordano Dr. James Giordano is head of the Center for Strategic Deterrence and Weapons of Mass Destruction Studies, Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS), National Defense University. Dr. Giordano is internationally recognized for his research on the use of neurocognitive sciences and technology in military and intelligence operations, has connections to DARPA, the Pentagon, etc. Let's go a little deeper on this tech and help you understand how advanced this tech is and what other forms are out there... This will focus more on the individual non-lethal tech. but is probably the most dangerous. There is also laser type weapons that can shoot done drones and all types of disrupting technology that was mentioned during the Maduro raid in Venezuela. There are many types of weapons in use. Artificial Telepathic, Neurotechnology, Mind Controller and Wireless Direct Energy Weapons, satellites, microwaves that put voices in your head, secret patents for remote brain control, and psychotronic torture used on civilians. Governments and agencies, primarily U.S., CIA, DARPA, Pentagon, DoD, also NATO, Soviet/Russian programs, and others, have developed and secretly deploy "mind weapons" psychotronic, directed-energy technologies against unwitting civilians, "Targeted Individuals" or TIs. Spy agencies, military, research institutes, and defense companies develop and deploy these technologies as weapons of mass destruction, espionage, and electronic warfare. These weapons are used for non-consensual experimentation, harassment, torture, isolation, and population control. There are lethal and non-lethal. Attacks occur in phases. First surveillance, satellites like Echelon, then directed-energy assaults causing physical pain, psychological destruction, induced voices/sounds, and behavior change. Victims are systematically discredited by labeling them mentally ill, schizophrenia, etc. Historical roots trace back in MKULTRA, Bluebird-era programs, Korean War "brainwashing" fears, Soviet Lida device, and microwave attacks on the US Embassy in Moscow. Super Artificial Intelligence Computer / Super Computer (satellite-based). A powerful non-contact weapon, radiation weapon, and weapon of mass destruction. Wireless Remote Neural Monitoring / Deep Tech Scanner, reads brain waves, sees inside the body, organs, veins, nervous system, without implants, uploads brain data to the satellite AI in seconds. Artificial / Synthetic Telepathy and brain-machine interface research, DARPA-funded university projects using EEG/MEG to decode thoughts. There's two types: - Active method: victim hears voices, like aliens, gods, or dead people, 24/7, causing fear, confusion, and mental breakdown. - Silent method: inaudible, hypnotic, "most dangerous," plays with the mind without the victim realizing. Voice to Skull (V2K) / Microwave Hearing, induces sounds/voices directly in the brain via microwaves. Wireless Direct Energy Weapons (DEWs), microwave, sonic (ultrasound/infrasound), scalar waves that damage organs, nerves, eyes, hearing, or electronics without physical contact. Bio Electro Magnetic Weapon and Psychotronic, Hypnotic Technology, controls neurons, brain waves, and behavior from a distance. Many of the patents and research programs can be found for this technology are real and public, non-lethal weapons, brain-computer interfaces, EM effects on the body/brain have legitimate scientific and military history. The most important aspects to this tech that you should understand is that: - No implants or chips needed, many devices work via waves, frequencies, radiation, and beams. - Can hack electronics, jam networks, disable vehicles/planes, damage appliances. - Range: several miles with "no limit." Here is a list of some patents you can look up yourself: - US 3,951,134: Remotely monitoring and altering brain waves. - US 6,011,991 A - DE 10 253 433 A1 - US 5,159,703 A: Silent Subliminal Presentation System, induces messages without audible sound. - US 4,717,343: Method of changing a person's behavior. - US 4,686,685: Altering regions of the Earth's atmosphere/ionosphere/magnetosphere, HAARP-related. There is much more to learn and understand, but know that this is very real and can do things to people that would almost be considered magic until you understand how it really works.
5:30

"Have you seen any evidence of DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS use, here on American soil?" "There are several instances of individuals being hit in what appears to be both sonic energy and forms of rapidly pulsed microwave energy, domestically. Some cases in Florida, some cases in the Delaware, Maryland, DC area, and some cases on the West Coast as well." - Dr. James Giordano Dr. James Giordano is head of the Center for Strategic Deterrence and Weapons of Mass Destruction Studies, Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS), National Defense University. Dr. Giordano is internationally recognized for his research on the use of neurocognitive sciences and technology in military and intelligence operations, has connections to DARPA, the Pentagon, etc. Let's go a little deeper on this tech and help you understand how advanced this tech is and what other forms are out there... This will focus more on the individual non-lethal tech. but is probably the most dangerous. There is also laser type weapons that can shoot done drones and all types of disrupting technology that was mentioned during the Maduro raid in Venezuela. There are many types of weapons in use. Artificial Telepathic, Neurotechnology, Mind Controller and Wireless Direct Energy Weapons, satellites, microwaves that put voices in your head, secret patents for remote brain control, and psychotronic torture used on civilians. Governments and agencies, primarily U.S., CIA, DARPA, Pentagon, DoD, also NATO, Soviet/Russian programs, and others, have developed and secretly deploy "mind weapons" psychotronic, directed-energy technologies against unwitting civilians, "Targeted Individuals" or TIs. Spy agencies, military, research institutes, and defense companies develop and deploy these technologies as weapons of mass destruction, espionage, and electronic warfare. These weapons are used for non-consensual experimentation, harassment, torture, isolation, and population control. There are lethal and non-lethal. Attacks occur in phases. First surveillance, satellites like Echelon, then directed-energy assaults causing physical pain, psychological destruction, induced voices/sounds, and behavior change. Victims are systematically discredited by labeling them mentally ill, schizophrenia, etc. Historical roots trace back in MKULTRA, Bluebird-era programs, Korean War "brainwashing" fears, Soviet Lida device, and microwave attacks on the US Embassy in Moscow. Super Artificial Intelligence Computer / Super Computer (satellite-based). A powerful non-contact weapon, radiation weapon, and weapon of mass destruction. Wireless Remote Neural Monitoring / Deep Tech Scanner, reads brain waves, sees inside the body, organs, veins, nervous system, without implants, uploads brain data to the satellite AI in seconds. Artificial / Synthetic Telepathy and brain-machine interface research, DARPA-funded university projects using EEG/MEG to decode thoughts. There's two types: - Active method: victim hears voices, like aliens, gods, or dead people, 24/7, causing fear, confusion, and mental breakdown. - Silent method: inaudible, hypnotic, "most dangerous," plays with the mind without the victim realizing. Voice to Skull (V2K) / Microwave Hearing, induces sounds/voices directly in the brain via microwaves. Wireless Direct Energy Weapons (DEWs), microwave, sonic (ultrasound/infrasound), scalar waves that damage organs, nerves, eyes, hearing, or electronics without physical contact. Bio Electro Magnetic Weapon and Psychotronic, Hypnotic Technology, controls neurons, brain waves, and behavior from a distance. Many of the patents and research programs can be found for this technology are real and public, non-lethal weapons, brain-computer interfaces, EM effects on the body/brain have legitimate scientific and military history. The most important aspects to this tech that you should understand is that: - No implants or chips needed, many devices work via waves, frequencies, radiation, and beams. - Can hack electronics, jam networks, disable vehicles/planes, damage appliances. - Range: several miles with "no limit." Here is a list of some patents you can look up yourself: - US 3,951,134: Remotely monitoring and altering brain waves. - US 6,011,991 A - DE 10 253 433 A1 - US 5,159,703 A: Silent Subliminal Presentation System, induces messages without audible sound. - US 4,717,343: Method of changing a person's behavior. - US 4,686,685: Altering regions of the Earth's atmosphere/ionosphere/magnetosphere, HAARP-related. There is much more to learn and understand, but know that this is very real and can do things to people that would almost be considered magic until you understand how it really works.

The SCIF

65,162 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🔥👀ARE WE SEEING IT YET? What is Thune up to in Texas? If Talarico wins do you know what this could actually mean for Texas? Watch & read this all the way to the end and tell me if everything clicks. We have a SERIOUS problem in Texas. The same GOP groups that spent $120 MILLION (Election history record) supporting Cornyn & attacking Paxton have only spent $500k on Paxton since he won the nomination. The Democrats have spent 48x more money supporting Talarico & attacking Paxton. Why doesn’t everyone know this? Thune essentially controls the spending. Wanna bet the money that Democrats were gonna spend on Platner will now be diverted to Texas? Just weeks ago…. Obama flew into Austin for a surprise in-person appearance with his hand-picked candidate. James Talarico. 37. Never married. Zero public relationships or girlfriends in all these years. He’s always said he’s straight. But his only dating history mention? One single line in Texas Monthly… quietly inserted by his own campaign team after the fact. They claimed he dated the homecoming queen back when he was the theater kid superstar in high school. For years: publicly single, private life. Then — right as questions heated up — he suddenly flies to LA for an emergency podcast drop and reveals he has a girlfriend. Calls her “my rock. My best friend.” Days later? She appears out of nowhere in a perfectly timed media story with “obtained” photos that raise more questions than answers. Here’s the thing: Her name is Brianna Menard — his former Chief of Staff. Her old bio highlighted “dancing the night away” at Cheer Up Charlie’s… Austin’s biggest queer-friendly bar famous for drag nights and the LGBTQ scene. Talarico brands himself as a devout Christian with Christmas sermons and family faith at the center. She’s a committed vegan, yoga buff, with a prominent “Jai Gurudev” Hindu spiritual tattoo. His progressive church library? Stocked with Gender Queer, All Boys Aren’t Blue, and This Book Is Gay — the exact books parents fought to pull from Texas school libraries. Four years of “dating” and she’s completely missing from every single Christmas or holiday post. No photos. No mentions. No family integration. They now claim annual Austin City Limits trips and Big Bend getaways… but those photos only dropped the second scrutiny got loud. No dates. Could be friends. Almost zero clear romantic shots. Why hide a former subordinate turned “girlfriend” for years? Democrats hammer everyone else on that. Or… maybe she was the safest public choice. An ally who would stay on message. (She’s since deleted her socials and now works for a PAC.) Meanwhile, national Dem heavyweights just poured over $30 MILLION into his campaign — big checks from Reid Hoffman, Pritzker, LA & NYC elites. Nearly half the large donations coming from outside Texas. They’re all-in on flipping red Texas. Texas has elected exactly ONLY ONE gay member of Congress in its history. Never an openly gay Senator. We know Obama is his kingmaker. We know Eric Holder vetted Tim Walz before being chosen as VP. We know Holder is Obama’s wingman. Now who did Tim Walz pardon last week? I was right on Platner almost a year ago that he was selected. THE LEFT IS CHOOSING THESE CANDIDATES FOR A REASON. He’s attended multiple Pride events. So I have to ask… Has Talarico himself ever spent real time at Cheer Up Charlie’s? Make sure everyone in Texas sees this ASAP. Is the Uniparty tanking Texas as revenge over Cornyn? WE CANNOT LOSE TEXAS.
3:33

🔥👀ARE WE SEEING IT YET? What is Thune up to in Texas? If Talarico wins do you know what this could actually mean for Texas? Watch & read this all the way to the end and tell me if everything clicks. We have a SERIOUS problem in Texas. The same GOP groups that spent $120 MILLION (Election history record) supporting Cornyn & attacking Paxton have only spent $500k on Paxton since he won the nomination. The Democrats have spent 48x more money supporting Talarico & attacking Paxton. Why doesn’t everyone know this? Thune essentially controls the spending. Wanna bet the money that Democrats were gonna spend on Platner will now be diverted to Texas? Just weeks ago…. Obama flew into Austin for a surprise in-person appearance with his hand-picked candidate. James Talarico. 37. Never married. Zero public relationships or girlfriends in all these years. He’s always said he’s straight. But his only dating history mention? One single line in Texas Monthly… quietly inserted by his own campaign team after the fact. They claimed he dated the homecoming queen back when he was the theater kid superstar in high school. For years: publicly single, private life. Then — right as questions heated up — he suddenly flies to LA for an emergency podcast drop and reveals he has a girlfriend. Calls her “my rock. My best friend.” Days later? She appears out of nowhere in a perfectly timed media story with “obtained” photos that raise more questions than answers. Here’s the thing: Her name is Brianna Menard — his former Chief of Staff. Her old bio highlighted “dancing the night away” at Cheer Up Charlie’s… Austin’s biggest queer-friendly bar famous for drag nights and the LGBTQ scene. Talarico brands himself as a devout Christian with Christmas sermons and family faith at the center. She’s a committed vegan, yoga buff, with a prominent “Jai Gurudev” Hindu spiritual tattoo. His progressive church library? Stocked with Gender Queer, All Boys Aren’t Blue, and This Book Is Gay — the exact books parents fought to pull from Texas school libraries. Four years of “dating” and she’s completely missing from every single Christmas or holiday post. No photos. No mentions. No family integration. They now claim annual Austin City Limits trips and Big Bend getaways… but those photos only dropped the second scrutiny got loud. No dates. Could be friends. Almost zero clear romantic shots. Why hide a former subordinate turned “girlfriend” for years? Democrats hammer everyone else on that. Or… maybe she was the safest public choice. An ally who would stay on message. (She’s since deleted her socials and now works for a PAC.) Meanwhile, national Dem heavyweights just poured over $30 MILLION into his campaign — big checks from Reid Hoffman, Pritzker, LA & NYC elites. Nearly half the large donations coming from outside Texas. They’re all-in on flipping red Texas. Texas has elected exactly ONLY ONE gay member of Congress in its history. Never an openly gay Senator. We know Obama is his kingmaker. We know Eric Holder vetted Tim Walz before being chosen as VP. We know Holder is Obama’s wingman. Now who did Tim Walz pardon last week? I was right on Platner almost a year ago that he was selected. THE LEFT IS CHOOSING THESE CANDIDATES FOR A REASON. He’s attended multiple Pride events. So I have to ask… Has Talarico himself ever spent real time at Cheer Up Charlie’s? Make sure everyone in Texas sees this ASAP. Is the Uniparty tanking Texas as revenge over Cornyn? WE CANNOT LOSE TEXAS.

Johnny St.Pete

12,700 просмотров • 1 месяц назад