正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

POST MATCH INTERVIEW - Coalville Town (A) Jamie Willo’s thoughts on this evenings 4-1 defeat vs Coalville Town FC are below! ⬇️ COMING UP 📆 - TheFaVase Saturday 18th October Stone Old Alleynians Football Club (H) - 3pm KO #upthesaints

sandiacre_town's profile picture

Sandiacre Town FC

2,643 subscribers

13,074 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

#upthesaints
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

“My donor isn’t here but his legacy is living through me. I think about him every day. By choosing organ donation – you are saving someone’s life.” Professional Footballer and Chesterfield FC coach Kieron Dyer has played for his hometown club, Ipswich, and his country - with 33 caps for England. In November 2015, Kieron appeared as a contestant on ‘I’m a Celebrity’ and lasted 21 days, coming fourth. Just six years later, in 2021, he was diagnosed with primary sclerosing cholangitis, and told he would need to undergo a liver transplant. Two years later, a successful donor was found and the operation took place in October 2023. Three months later Kieron was back in the dugout at Chesterfield, and within six months picking up his winner’s medal after Chesterfield FC won the Vanarama Conference League in April. Deeply emotional as he watched the scenes on the pitch that day, Kieron admits that his donor was at the forefront of his thoughts. Here, Kieron talks about the liver transplant which he admits ‘saved his life’ and the journey it took him on. He also has a message for the NHS… Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Chesterfield FC Ipswich Town NHS Organ Donation 💗🫀🫁
4:42

“My donor isn’t here but his legacy is living through me. I think about him every day. By choosing organ donation – you are saving someone’s life.” Professional Footballer and Chesterfield FC coach Kieron Dyer has played for his hometown club, Ipswich, and his country - with 33 caps for England. In November 2015, Kieron appeared as a contestant on ‘I’m a Celebrity’ and lasted 21 days, coming fourth. Just six years later, in 2021, he was diagnosed with primary sclerosing cholangitis, and told he would need to undergo a liver transplant. Two years later, a successful donor was found and the operation took place in October 2023. Three months later Kieron was back in the dugout at Chesterfield, and within six months picking up his winner’s medal after Chesterfield FC won the Vanarama Conference League in April. Deeply emotional as he watched the scenes on the pitch that day, Kieron admits that his donor was at the forefront of his thoughts. Here, Kieron talks about the liver transplant which he admits ‘saved his life’ and the journey it took him on. He also has a message for the NHS… Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Chesterfield FC Ipswich Town NHS Organ Donation 💗🫀🫁

Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS FT

20,196 次观看 • 1 年前

A lot of people are saying Justin Herbert was “rude” to ESPN’s Laura Rutledge for not wanting to do this postgame interview after the Chargers OT win vs Philly My thoughts: 1. He did come across a little rude, but acted like a professional after he reluctantly agreed to be interviewed. 2. Laura was persistent and just tried to do her job. 3. Herbert deserves some grace. He’s is coming off of a big win, beat up after 7 sacks and just had hand surgery. He just wants a few seconds to celebrate with his team. 4. Laura, and many of these female reporters, need to ask better questions. “What was it like” questions are so tiresome… 5. As far as I’m aware, and based on my own experience interviewing athletes during/after games, a broadcast team/reporter gives the team’s PR personnel a head’s up who they want to interview and that player is, at least, aware of a potential interview, so Herbert wouldn’t be surprised. 6. Stop acting like this is an “attack on women”. That’s completely irrational & unfounded. 7. Herbert has consistently been one of the most polite athletes with media in the league. It wasn’t a great look, but trying to crucify him over this is silly.
0:59

A lot of people are saying Justin Herbert was “rude” to ESPN’s Laura Rutledge for not wanting to do this postgame interview after the Chargers OT win vs Philly My thoughts: 1. He did come across a little rude, but acted like a professional after he reluctantly agreed to be interviewed. 2. Laura was persistent and just tried to do her job. 3. Herbert deserves some grace. He’s is coming off of a big win, beat up after 7 sacks and just had hand surgery. He just wants a few seconds to celebrate with his team. 4. Laura, and many of these female reporters, need to ask better questions. “What was it like” questions are so tiresome… 5. As far as I’m aware, and based on my own experience interviewing athletes during/after games, a broadcast team/reporter gives the team’s PR personnel a head’s up who they want to interview and that player is, at least, aware of a potential interview, so Herbert wouldn’t be surprised. 6. Stop acting like this is an “attack on women”. That’s completely irrational & unfounded. 7. Herbert has consistently been one of the most polite athletes with media in the league. It wasn’t a great look, but trying to crucify him over this is silly.

Jon Root

1,035,596 次观看 • 7 个月前

Gaelic Football Coaching, South of Ireland Conference 5 days to go!! Tickets selling out(club tickets will fill our limits very fast) We are hosting a very exciting event for gaelic Football coaches in the South of Ireland, and we’d love to see you there. Join us for Coaching the principles of Gaelic Football, South of Ireland Conference, 22 November 2025 at 9:30 AM at Fethard Town Park Sporting Facility, Co. Tipperary. The event is being run by Kevin and is going to be the opening presenter as well. We have an excellent and highly experienced crew of presenters that are going to bring us through what are "principles of play" to coaching the principles of the game at the various ages and levels. The presenters will detail how they develop skills, individuals and principles of play with their teams in a practical applied setting. We have All Ireland winning players and coaches and a wide group of vastly experienced and highly qualified people. There is simply nothing like this for Football lovers and coaches in the South. We want to change this and have an annual flagship event. See below a look into what Evan Talty ( iGaelicCoach ) where Evan outlines what they are going to bring to the conference, delving how he builds a game model. Evan is just coming off coaching Limerick Senior Footballers and St. Brigids Roscommon. Check out the link for more details on the day and the presenters. Register soon because space is limited. Space for approx 25 individuals or 3/4 clubs at present. We hope you’re able to join us!
1:34

Gaelic Football Coaching, South of Ireland Conference 5 days to go!! Tickets selling out(club tickets will fill our limits very fast) We are hosting a very exciting event for gaelic Football coaches in the South of Ireland, and we’d love to see you there. Join us for Coaching the principles of Gaelic Football, South of Ireland Conference, 22 November 2025 at 9:30 AM at Fethard Town Park Sporting Facility, Co. Tipperary. The event is being run by Kevin and is going to be the opening presenter as well. We have an excellent and highly experienced crew of presenters that are going to bring us through what are "principles of play" to coaching the principles of the game at the various ages and levels. The presenters will detail how they develop skills, individuals and principles of play with their teams in a practical applied setting. We have All Ireland winning players and coaches and a wide group of vastly experienced and highly qualified people. There is simply nothing like this for Football lovers and coaches in the South. We want to change this and have an annual flagship event. See below a look into what Evan Talty ( iGaelicCoach ) where Evan outlines what they are going to bring to the conference, delving how he builds a game model. Evan is just coming off coaching Limerick Senior Footballers and St. Brigids Roscommon. Check out the link for more details on the day and the presenters. Register soon because space is limited. Space for approx 25 individuals or 3/4 clubs at present. We hope you’re able to join us!

Kevin Mulcahy

21,289 次观看 • 8 个月前

[T1 vs. DK] Post match interview with T1 Oner and Coach Kkoma after defeat against Dplus Kia Q: How do you feel about the match? 🐯: We were leading 2:0, but we ended up losing 2:3. It's very disappointing. 👤: It's very disappointing to lose today. I think the other team played better and that’s why they won. Q: What do you think was the reason for the loss today? 👤: We were in a good position, but the other team focused better, and that led to our defeat. Q: Why do you think the focus wasn't there? 👤: There were moments when we had the advantage, but we couldn't capitalize on them and secure the win. That's what I find most disappointing. Q: Oner, what do you think was the reason for the loss? 🐯: There were some mistakes around the objectives. We couldn't execute our plans as intended before the objectives appeared. These mistakes piled up, and combined with losing team fights, led to our defeat. Q: Why did you pick Kha'Zix and why didn't it work out? 🐯: I thought Kha'Zix could be a good 'joker' pick [or a surprise car] in the 4th or 5th set, so I practiced him a lot in solo queue. We picked him in the 3rd set because we thought he had good synergy with Twisted Fate. Although the result was disappointing, I think the draft itself was fine. Q: How do you feel about the team's performance in this tournament? 👤: The players prepared very hard, and I'm sorry we couldn't show more of what we had. We will prepare better for the next match and show a better performance. Q: What was the strategy for the draft after the match against BNK? 👤: When we had the advantage, we followed the plan we had prepared. It's just a pity we couldn't secure the win when we were ahead. Q: What do you plan to improve on? 👤: There are many areas to improve, not just one. We need to focus on our macro, team fights, and adapting to the new patch. Q: Oner, what are your thoughts on your own performance throughout the tournament? 🐯: There were many good moments, but also many poor ones. I need to fix those mistakes. There's some time until the regular season starts, so I'll practice hard and show a better performance. Q: Despite having Kalista in Game 5, you lost the Smite fight (objective fight). What happened? 🐯: Well, our plan was, as you mentioned, to secure the objective by combining Kalista’s [rend] with my Smite. We had discussed that strategy often. However, in that specific teamfight, things got quite chaotic and complicated. It didn’t play out the way we wanted, which I think is why we ended up having the objective stolen. Q: Any final words to wrap up the interview? 👤: I feel very sorry toward the players because I feel like I didn’t help them enough to stay focused until the very end. I feel quite bad about that. For our next match, we will prepare even harder to show a better performance than we did today. Please continue to support T1. 🐯: I know many T1 fans had high expectations and gave us a lot of support, so I feel very sorry that we weren't able to live up to that. We will prepare thoroughly for the regular season and I promise to show you a better, more impressive side of ourselves then. Oner=🐯 Kkoma=👤
4:08

[T1 vs. DK] Post match interview with T1 Oner and Coach Kkoma after defeat against Dplus Kia Q: How do you feel about the match? 🐯: We were leading 2:0, but we ended up losing 2:3. It's very disappointing. 👤: It's very disappointing to lose today. I think the other team played better and that’s why they won. Q: What do you think was the reason for the loss today? 👤: We were in a good position, but the other team focused better, and that led to our defeat. Q: Why do you think the focus wasn't there? 👤: There were moments when we had the advantage, but we couldn't capitalize on them and secure the win. That's what I find most disappointing. Q: Oner, what do you think was the reason for the loss? 🐯: There were some mistakes around the objectives. We couldn't execute our plans as intended before the objectives appeared. These mistakes piled up, and combined with losing team fights, led to our defeat. Q: Why did you pick Kha'Zix and why didn't it work out? 🐯: I thought Kha'Zix could be a good 'joker' pick [or a surprise car] in the 4th or 5th set, so I practiced him a lot in solo queue. We picked him in the 3rd set because we thought he had good synergy with Twisted Fate. Although the result was disappointing, I think the draft itself was fine. Q: How do you feel about the team's performance in this tournament? 👤: The players prepared very hard, and I'm sorry we couldn't show more of what we had. We will prepare better for the next match and show a better performance. Q: What was the strategy for the draft after the match against BNK? 👤: When we had the advantage, we followed the plan we had prepared. It's just a pity we couldn't secure the win when we were ahead. Q: What do you plan to improve on? 👤: There are many areas to improve, not just one. We need to focus on our macro, team fights, and adapting to the new patch. Q: Oner, what are your thoughts on your own performance throughout the tournament? 🐯: There were many good moments, but also many poor ones. I need to fix those mistakes. There's some time until the regular season starts, so I'll practice hard and show a better performance. Q: Despite having Kalista in Game 5, you lost the Smite fight (objective fight). What happened? 🐯: Well, our plan was, as you mentioned, to secure the objective by combining Kalista’s [rend] with my Smite. We had discussed that strategy often. However, in that specific teamfight, things got quite chaotic and complicated. It didn’t play out the way we wanted, which I think is why we ended up having the objective stolen. Q: Any final words to wrap up the interview? 👤: I feel very sorry toward the players because I feel like I didn’t help them enough to stay focused until the very end. I feel quite bad about that. For our next match, we will prepare even harder to show a better performance than we did today. Please continue to support T1. 🐯: I know many T1 fans had high expectations and gave us a lot of support, so I feel very sorry that we weren't able to live up to that. We will prepare thoroughly for the regular season and I promise to show you a better, more impressive side of ourselves then. Oner=🐯 Kkoma=👤

안개새벽 𓏲ּ𝄢

32,503 次观看 • 4 个月前

Lots of people are sleeping on Quinn Priester... I have a feeling this dude is going to make an impact with the major league club next year. Let’s talk about it. Adding velo to the sinker (SI) has been a constant emphasis since coming over via trade, and we already saw a minor increase last year. Avg SI velo (2024) 📈 • w/ PIT: 93.0 mph • w/ BOS: 93.8 mph NOTE: Remove his first two appearances where there wasn’t really any changes made, and his avg SI velo now sits at 94.2 mph. Games where SI sat 94+ mph 📈 • w/ PIT: 2 (of 23) • w/ BOS: 5 (of 10) He’s comfortably hit 96 and topped 97 mph for Worcester (seen in video attached), and has been grinding on a velo program this winter as well. Other top velos, just for fun… • FF: 96.3 mph* • SL: 92.3 mph • CU: 83.5 mph* • CH: 92 mph* • FC: 94.4 mph* *indicates top velo was w/ BOS — On top of this, we all know that Bres/Bailey & Co. love their whiff and secondary offerings. Priester took a huge step forward last year in both of these categories. Overall whiff 📈 • w/ PIT: 29.8% • w: BOS: 35.4% Arsenal whiff w/ BOS 📈 • SI: 22% • FF: 30% • FC: 42% • SL: 48% (‼️) • CU: 43%** **hot take: SI/SL combo are his carrying pitches, but his best pitch is his CH — Clearly, there’s something there. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see a major usage change. Here’s what I would propose: • FA (FF/SI/FC): 46.3% ➡️ 30% - SI: 20% (“get me over” or “need it” kind of pitch; needs to be for a strike, low in zone; CH plays off it) - FC: 9% (would love to use it more, but had a limited sample size in 2024; start off as a LHH-exclusive like Garett Whitlock showcased; needs to either be elevated (tunnel w/ FF) or down+out (tunnel w/ SL) - FF: 1% (similar to what we saw Bello implement… only deploy in key situations; must be elevated) • SL: 31.8% ➡️ 35% - emphasis on gloveside target against both LHH/RHH; vs LHH, catcher sets up more middle/out - maybe try some armside vs LHH to dupe batters? • CH: 14% ➡️ 25% - best pitch results in MLB (.167 BAA, .167 SLG, 29% whiff in limited sample size) but can’t be overused - need to tunnel w/ SI… make sure low in/out of zone; see: Whitlock • CU: 8% ➡️ 10% - LHH exclusive offering, tunnels w/ elevated FC/FF - needs to miss low Overall: SI “first” for strikes with a very heavy dosage of SL/CH mixed in vs both LHH/RHH. FC/CB to LHH only. Elevated FF only in certain sequences. I’ve attached some specific videos to further emphasize my points. • Clip #1: Bogaerts whiff on CH • Clip #2: disgusting SLs to RHHs • Clip #3: Priester sinkers (T97 mph) • Clip #4: just pure nastiness Oh, and a friendly reminder: he’s just 24 years old. There is so much potential to tap into here. The stuff, for one, is there and only getting better. My favorite Red Sox pitcher right now is by far Garrett Whitlock. I see a little bit of baby Whitty in Priester’s delivery, frame, and stuff. 👀 — Alrighty, that was a lot lol. I hope everyone enjoyed. If you have questions, comments, or even player requests, feel free to reach out! I am super excited to see what Priester can do in 2025 and beyond. What do you think? ⬇️
0:20

Lots of people are sleeping on Quinn Priester... I have a feeling this dude is going to make an impact with the major league club next year. Let’s talk about it. Adding velo to the sinker (SI) has been a constant emphasis since coming over via trade, and we already saw a minor increase last year. Avg SI velo (2024) 📈 • w/ PIT: 93.0 mph • w/ BOS: 93.8 mph NOTE: Remove his first two appearances where there wasn’t really any changes made, and his avg SI velo now sits at 94.2 mph. Games where SI sat 94+ mph 📈 • w/ PIT: 2 (of 23) • w/ BOS: 5 (of 10) He’s comfortably hit 96 and topped 97 mph for Worcester (seen in video attached), and has been grinding on a velo program this winter as well. Other top velos, just for fun… • FF: 96.3 mph* • SL: 92.3 mph • CU: 83.5 mph* • CH: 92 mph* • FC: 94.4 mph* *indicates top velo was w/ BOS — On top of this, we all know that Bres/Bailey & Co. love their whiff and secondary offerings. Priester took a huge step forward last year in both of these categories. Overall whiff 📈 • w/ PIT: 29.8% • w: BOS: 35.4% Arsenal whiff w/ BOS 📈 • SI: 22% • FF: 30% • FC: 42% • SL: 48% (‼️) • CU: 43%** **hot take: SI/SL combo are his carrying pitches, but his best pitch is his CH — Clearly, there’s something there. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see a major usage change. Here’s what I would propose: • FA (FF/SI/FC): 46.3% ➡️ 30% - SI: 20% (“get me over” or “need it” kind of pitch; needs to be for a strike, low in zone; CH plays off it) - FC: 9% (would love to use it more, but had a limited sample size in 2024; start off as a LHH-exclusive like Garett Whitlock showcased; needs to either be elevated (tunnel w/ FF) or down+out (tunnel w/ SL) - FF: 1% (similar to what we saw Bello implement… only deploy in key situations; must be elevated) • SL: 31.8% ➡️ 35% - emphasis on gloveside target against both LHH/RHH; vs LHH, catcher sets up more middle/out - maybe try some armside vs LHH to dupe batters? • CH: 14% ➡️ 25% - best pitch results in MLB (.167 BAA, .167 SLG, 29% whiff in limited sample size) but can’t be overused - need to tunnel w/ SI… make sure low in/out of zone; see: Whitlock • CU: 8% ➡️ 10% - LHH exclusive offering, tunnels w/ elevated FC/FF - needs to miss low Overall: SI “first” for strikes with a very heavy dosage of SL/CH mixed in vs both LHH/RHH. FC/CB to LHH only. Elevated FF only in certain sequences. I’ve attached some specific videos to further emphasize my points. • Clip #1: Bogaerts whiff on CH • Clip #2: disgusting SLs to RHHs • Clip #3: Priester sinkers (T97 mph) • Clip #4: just pure nastiness Oh, and a friendly reminder: he’s just 24 years old. There is so much potential to tap into here. The stuff, for one, is there and only getting better. My favorite Red Sox pitcher right now is by far Garrett Whitlock. I see a little bit of baby Whitty in Priester’s delivery, frame, and stuff. 👀 — Alrighty, that was a lot lol. I hope everyone enjoyed. If you have questions, comments, or even player requests, feel free to reach out! I am super excited to see what Priester can do in 2025 and beyond. What do you think? ⬇️

G.G.

54,654 次观看 • 1 年前

Pre Game Spurs v Notts Forest it’s not just a game,It’s THE game. A straight-up six-pointer in the relegation trenches. Only one point separates us 16th vs 17th and everything’s is on the line. We’ve been battered, bruised, winless in the league in 2026 and we are now staring down the barrel of the drop for the first time in decades. TV Pundits laughing already saying we are going down , ex-players throwing in unhelpful comments , The press saying our own fans will turn toxic if we go behind. They think we’ll crumble. Nah Not today for me 👊🏼😎🔥 This is bigger than any recent derby. This is about pride, survival, the soul of the club. Igor Tudor’s got us fighting again,holding Liverpool, beating Atletico now we need to finish the job at home. The Stadium will be a cauldron. Hopefully Deafening. Hostile to them, electric for us. We don’t need fancy football today we need heart. Grit. Hunger passion and level heads on the pitch.Every single one of you in the stands, or on the sofa, at home watching on tv screaming COYS until your voice gives out. Forest come with confidence after beating us 3-0 in the away leg but they went on to lose the next 4 games without scoring so spurs that performance.All that said this is OUR house. Our future. Our club on the brink. Win this, and we breathe. Lose, and the nightmare deepens. No more excuses. No more what-ifs. Come on you Spurs. All Together Always. Let’s save our season. Let’s roar them into submission. I’m going for a 3-1 win let me know your score prediction below My sponsor is Squad Bets check out their app download it now in the App Store you can Bet on you score prediction with your mates. It’s easy to use: create a Squad, invite your mates, start playing. It’s great fun SquadBets AD 18+ #COYS 🤍💙
2:05

Pre Game Spurs v Notts Forest it’s not just a game,It’s THE game. A straight-up six-pointer in the relegation trenches. Only one point separates us 16th vs 17th and everything’s is on the line. We’ve been battered, bruised, winless in the league in 2026 and we are now staring down the barrel of the drop for the first time in decades. TV Pundits laughing already saying we are going down , ex-players throwing in unhelpful comments , The press saying our own fans will turn toxic if we go behind. They think we’ll crumble. Nah Not today for me 👊🏼😎🔥 This is bigger than any recent derby. This is about pride, survival, the soul of the club. Igor Tudor’s got us fighting again,holding Liverpool, beating Atletico now we need to finish the job at home. The Stadium will be a cauldron. Hopefully Deafening. Hostile to them, electric for us. We don’t need fancy football today we need heart. Grit. Hunger passion and level heads on the pitch.Every single one of you in the stands, or on the sofa, at home watching on tv screaming COYS until your voice gives out. Forest come with confidence after beating us 3-0 in the away leg but they went on to lose the next 4 games without scoring so spurs that performance.All that said this is OUR house. Our future. Our club on the brink. Win this, and we breathe. Lose, and the nightmare deepens. No more excuses. No more what-ifs. Come on you Spurs. All Together Always. Let’s save our season. Let’s roar them into submission. I’m going for a 3-1 win let me know your score prediction below My sponsor is Squad Bets check out their app download it now in the App Store you can Bet on you score prediction with your mates. It’s easy to use: create a Squad, invite your mates, start playing. It’s great fun SquadBets AD 18+ #COYS 🤍💙

Jonny H

63,959 次观看 • 3 个月前

Pressing, transitions and goals in Canada! After the hiring of Jesse Marsch this week by Canada Soccer , there has been lots of talk about pressing and transitions in the football community. This is THE style of play that we have used for the last 5 years with Alliance United FC in @L1OMens and will give you some insight in how this can look. We went away from the 'possession' based 1-4-3-3 that everyone has been using as the 'best way' to develop players and win games. Many say this is the 'right way' of playing. However, we use the players' abilities and inabilities as the starting point and based on players produced in Canada, within our youth system, this is the way we think will get us the best results and help our players get to the next level. You need to understand youth development in our country to understand what is and what is not being taught to young players. This is not a negative outlook, it is just looking at the reality. Many mistake this style of play as just non-stop pressing and chaos. Yes, these two aspects are important but it is a much more deliberate and planned way of playing that is used to predict where the opposition will play the ball, where the ball can be dictated and what areas the opposition leave open for transitions when they attack. In 2019, I was introduced to Ernst Tanner former Academy Director of Red Bull Salzburg and current Philadelphia Union Sporting Director that has led the club to being one of the top clubs in MLS and arguably the best academies in North America the last few years. Both organisations are known for their pressing and fast transitions in addition to producing top players. He became a mentor to me and gave me insights and education on this style of play. He has changed the way I look at football. Every season we try to recruit players that can play this style that I will describe below and we do not waiver in the way we played. Every game since 2019 Alliance United FC have played either in a 1-4-2-2-2 or a 1-4-4-2 midfield diamond....every game. We have no secrets in how we play. We focus on defending, pressing, forcing teams into mistakes and transition football. It is important to understand that we do not care how much possession we have and we actually want the opposition to have the ball most of the time. Stats in football show that only when a team has the ball 70% or more in a match their is a correlation to winning. Anything less is not correlated to winning in a certain match. In addition, 80% of goals are scored under 5 passes or less and under 10 seconds when regaining possession. We follow the trend! So, here are some important points based on the video: a) Pressing higher up the pitch when possible. All 11 players are committed to the team intention (principles) and if anybody is not committed and does not contribute to this style of play, they do not play. There is no leeway on this. Either you are in 100% in or you are not. All it takes is one player to not commit and the plan will not work. If we do not win the ball on the high press, everyone is to drop behind the ball as fast as possible to restart the press closer to our goal. b) Based on the opponent's scouting we press certain players and decide if will press closer to the sideline and 'pin' the player to the sideline or we dictate the passes and dribbles centrally and 'surround' the player to win the ball in central positions. We also decide if we will sometimes drop lower for the opposition to advance so we can play behind them when winning the ball. This is done if we scout that the opposition centre-backs are slower than our two strikers. This means we will 'outrun' them in the space they leave behind. c) When winning the ball we want to exploit space behind their backline as the priority which means that a player(s) need to be passing options behind the backline and preferably centrally which is closer to the goal, players winning the ball has to look to play the ball to the player furthest up the pitch. Possession is not a priority but scoring goals as fast as possible is. d) When winning the ball we stay as central as possible with passes and dribbling. We use the width of the penalty area (44 yards) as the preferable dimension when transitioning. We want to stay within this width. The wider the team plays the ball, the more time the opposition has to block the middle. PLAY AS VERTICALLY AS POSSIBLE! The emphasis is to get the ball to the two strikers and play 1v1 against the CBs. e) We know that most youth players grow up playing against a 1-4-3-3 which means there is one central striker meaning the centre-backs one back press and one can cover. Against 2 strikers this is not possible and many centre-backs do not have the ability to play 1v1 with space behind them. They are not taught the cues to step and press or drop to protect space behind them. They are never taught at youth level. We exploit this deficiency. e) All 11 players must get up the pitch to close the spaces if we lose the ball from our attacking transition so the opposition cannot transition against us and we can counter-press. f) A goal is the best outcome based on the objective of attacking but at the minimum we want to get a shot on goal from a transition. This is a quick overview of a different way of playing football that Canada will see with the Men's National Team.
1:55

Pressing, transitions and goals in Canada! After the hiring of Jesse Marsch this week by Canada Soccer , there has been lots of talk about pressing and transitions in the football community. This is THE style of play that we have used for the last 5 years with Alliance United FC in @L1OMens and will give you some insight in how this can look. We went away from the 'possession' based 1-4-3-3 that everyone has been using as the 'best way' to develop players and win games. Many say this is the 'right way' of playing. However, we use the players' abilities and inabilities as the starting point and based on players produced in Canada, within our youth system, this is the way we think will get us the best results and help our players get to the next level. You need to understand youth development in our country to understand what is and what is not being taught to young players. This is not a negative outlook, it is just looking at the reality. Many mistake this style of play as just non-stop pressing and chaos. Yes, these two aspects are important but it is a much more deliberate and planned way of playing that is used to predict where the opposition will play the ball, where the ball can be dictated and what areas the opposition leave open for transitions when they attack. In 2019, I was introduced to Ernst Tanner former Academy Director of Red Bull Salzburg and current Philadelphia Union Sporting Director that has led the club to being one of the top clubs in MLS and arguably the best academies in North America the last few years. Both organisations are known for their pressing and fast transitions in addition to producing top players. He became a mentor to me and gave me insights and education on this style of play. He has changed the way I look at football. Every season we try to recruit players that can play this style that I will describe below and we do not waiver in the way we played. Every game since 2019 Alliance United FC have played either in a 1-4-2-2-2 or a 1-4-4-2 midfield diamond....every game. We have no secrets in how we play. We focus on defending, pressing, forcing teams into mistakes and transition football. It is important to understand that we do not care how much possession we have and we actually want the opposition to have the ball most of the time. Stats in football show that only when a team has the ball 70% or more in a match their is a correlation to winning. Anything less is not correlated to winning in a certain match. In addition, 80% of goals are scored under 5 passes or less and under 10 seconds when regaining possession. We follow the trend! So, here are some important points based on the video: a) Pressing higher up the pitch when possible. All 11 players are committed to the team intention (principles) and if anybody is not committed and does not contribute to this style of play, they do not play. There is no leeway on this. Either you are in 100% in or you are not. All it takes is one player to not commit and the plan will not work. If we do not win the ball on the high press, everyone is to drop behind the ball as fast as possible to restart the press closer to our goal. b) Based on the opponent's scouting we press certain players and decide if will press closer to the sideline and 'pin' the player to the sideline or we dictate the passes and dribbles centrally and 'surround' the player to win the ball in central positions. We also decide if we will sometimes drop lower for the opposition to advance so we can play behind them when winning the ball. This is done if we scout that the opposition centre-backs are slower than our two strikers. This means we will 'outrun' them in the space they leave behind. c) When winning the ball we want to exploit space behind their backline as the priority which means that a player(s) need to be passing options behind the backline and preferably centrally which is closer to the goal, players winning the ball has to look to play the ball to the player furthest up the pitch. Possession is not a priority but scoring goals as fast as possible is. d) When winning the ball we stay as central as possible with passes and dribbling. We use the width of the penalty area (44 yards) as the preferable dimension when transitioning. We want to stay within this width. The wider the team plays the ball, the more time the opposition has to block the middle. PLAY AS VERTICALLY AS POSSIBLE! The emphasis is to get the ball to the two strikers and play 1v1 against the CBs. e) We know that most youth players grow up playing against a 1-4-3-3 which means there is one central striker meaning the centre-backs one back press and one can cover. Against 2 strikers this is not possible and many centre-backs do not have the ability to play 1v1 with space behind them. They are not taught the cues to step and press or drop to protect space behind them. They are never taught at youth level. We exploit this deficiency. e) All 11 players must get up the pitch to close the spaces if we lose the ball from our attacking transition so the opposition cannot transition against us and we can counter-press. f) A goal is the best outcome based on the objective of attacking but at the minimum we want to get a shot on goal from a transition. This is a quick overview of a different way of playing football that Canada will see with the Men's National Team.

Ilya Orlov

14,112 次观看 • 2 年前

🏙 Stone Street: A Stroll Through History •Oldest paved street in New York. Originally in the Dutch colony of New Amsterdam (established around 1624), Stone Street was officially paved in 1658. It was among the city’s first steps toward becoming the metropolis we know. •Name evolution. It wasn’t always “Stone Street.” Parts of it were two colonial streets: Breuers Straet (“Brewers Street” for the breweries), and Hoogh Straet (“High Street”). After British control, names shifted: the street was called “Duke Street” for a while. It finally got its current name “Stone Street” in 1794, a nod to its cobblestone paving and a move away from British‑era names. •Fire & rebirth. The Great Fire of 1835 destroyed many buildings in the area. After this catastrophe, Stone Street was quickly rebuilt with new commercial structures (counting houses, lofts) in styles like Greek Revival. •Decline & revival. Over time, Stone Street lost prestige: paving got replaced with asphalt, buildings deteriorated, storefronts fell quiet. In the 1990s the area was designated a historic district (City Landmark in 1996; added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1999) and a restoration was undertaken. The restoration included laying down 23,000 Belgian blocks to re‑cobble the street, restoring old style lighting, replacing sidewalks, curbs. That transformation was done around 2000. •Today. Stone Street is pedestrian only (in its eastern section) and vibrant. It’s packed with restaurants, bars, outdoor dining, locals and tourists mingling, with a strong sense of history underfoot (literally…the cobblestones!). A mix of cuisines, ambience, a go to for lively nights or atmospheric afternoons in Lower Manhattan. •Fun fact(s): •George Washington used to wet his whistle (i.e. drink in the bars) here in the 1780s. •The original colonial street is still below the current surface in places, excavations have revealed parts of the 1600s pavement beneath today’s street level. 🍻 Oktoberfest on Stone Street — What’s the Deal in 2025 If you’re gearing up for Oktoberfest vibes, Stone Street is definitely pulling out all the stops this year. •When: Six consecutive Saturdays, starting Saturday, September 13, 2025. •Time: From noon until 11:00 PM those Saturdays. •What to expect: •Traditional German + international food (pretzels, wursts, etc.) •German beer served in classic steins. •Live music / bands, plus some weekends with DJs. •Stein holding competitions. •Games, photo booths, tents, communal tables, basically a beer garden festival atmosphere in the heart of Lower Manhattan. •Where: The pedestrian only section of Stone Street, between 85 Broad Street and Hanover Square, parallel to Pearl Street & South Williams. •Admission: Free to attend; food & drinks sold by participating restaurants / bars. 🚶‍♂️ How to Get to Stone Street From Times Square (NYC‑Style) Here’s your off‑beat vs. tourist approach so you arrive in style. Starting Point: Times Square (Midtown Manhattan) Subway (fastest, especially off‑peak): •Take the 2 or 3 train from Times Square–42nd Street heading downtown (toward Brooklyn or South Ferry) to Wall Street station. Then walk east/downhill. •Alternatively, you can transfer if needed: 1 train/other routes, but 2/3 is pretty direct. •You could also do 4 or 5 to Bowling Green, or J or Z to Broad Street depending on timing and where exactly you land. 2.Walking (if you like a longer walk and some views) •It’s about 4‑5 miles depending on your exact spot in Times Square; maybe 1.5‑2 hours walking, but you’ll see different neighborhoods (Bryant Park, Grand Central, etc.) •More likely you’d mix walking + subway. Taxi / Ride‑share: •Ask for “Stone Street, Financial District” or “Stone Street between Broad and Hanover Square”. •Depending on traffic, could take 20‑30 minutes from Midtown, maybe more at busy times.
0:58

🏙 Stone Street: A Stroll Through History •Oldest paved street in New York. Originally in the Dutch colony of New Amsterdam (established around 1624), Stone Street was officially paved in 1658. It was among the city’s first steps toward becoming the metropolis we know. •Name evolution. It wasn’t always “Stone Street.” Parts of it were two colonial streets: Breuers Straet (“Brewers Street” for the breweries), and Hoogh Straet (“High Street”). After British control, names shifted: the street was called “Duke Street” for a while. It finally got its current name “Stone Street” in 1794, a nod to its cobblestone paving and a move away from British‑era names. •Fire & rebirth. The Great Fire of 1835 destroyed many buildings in the area. After this catastrophe, Stone Street was quickly rebuilt with new commercial structures (counting houses, lofts) in styles like Greek Revival. •Decline & revival. Over time, Stone Street lost prestige: paving got replaced with asphalt, buildings deteriorated, storefronts fell quiet. In the 1990s the area was designated a historic district (City Landmark in 1996; added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1999) and a restoration was undertaken. The restoration included laying down 23,000 Belgian blocks to re‑cobble the street, restoring old style lighting, replacing sidewalks, curbs. That transformation was done around 2000. •Today. Stone Street is pedestrian only (in its eastern section) and vibrant. It’s packed with restaurants, bars, outdoor dining, locals and tourists mingling, with a strong sense of history underfoot (literally…the cobblestones!). A mix of cuisines, ambience, a go to for lively nights or atmospheric afternoons in Lower Manhattan. •Fun fact(s): •George Washington used to wet his whistle (i.e. drink in the bars) here in the 1780s. •The original colonial street is still below the current surface in places, excavations have revealed parts of the 1600s pavement beneath today’s street level. 🍻 Oktoberfest on Stone Street — What’s the Deal in 2025 If you’re gearing up for Oktoberfest vibes, Stone Street is definitely pulling out all the stops this year. •When: Six consecutive Saturdays, starting Saturday, September 13, 2025. •Time: From noon until 11:00 PM those Saturdays. •What to expect: •Traditional German + international food (pretzels, wursts, etc.) •German beer served in classic steins. •Live music / bands, plus some weekends with DJs. •Stein holding competitions. •Games, photo booths, tents, communal tables, basically a beer garden festival atmosphere in the heart of Lower Manhattan. •Where: The pedestrian only section of Stone Street, between 85 Broad Street and Hanover Square, parallel to Pearl Street & South Williams. •Admission: Free to attend; food & drinks sold by participating restaurants / bars. 🚶‍♂️ How to Get to Stone Street From Times Square (NYC‑Style) Here’s your off‑beat vs. tourist approach so you arrive in style. Starting Point: Times Square (Midtown Manhattan) Subway (fastest, especially off‑peak): •Take the 2 or 3 train from Times Square–42nd Street heading downtown (toward Brooklyn or South Ferry) to Wall Street station. Then walk east/downhill. •Alternatively, you can transfer if needed: 1 train/other routes, but 2/3 is pretty direct. •You could also do 4 or 5 to Bowling Green, or J or Z to Broad Street depending on timing and where exactly you land. 2.Walking (if you like a longer walk and some views) •It’s about 4‑5 miles depending on your exact spot in Times Square; maybe 1.5‑2 hours walking, but you’ll see different neighborhoods (Bryant Park, Grand Central, etc.) •More likely you’d mix walking + subway. Taxi / Ride‑share: •Ask for “Stone Street, Financial District” or “Stone Street between Broad and Hanover Square”. •Depending on traffic, could take 20‑30 minutes from Midtown, maybe more at busy times.

NewYorkCityKopp

21,697 次观看 • 10 个月前

Tom Segura has been doing stand-up comedy for ~25 years. He's known for his Netflix specials and a TV show called Bad Thoughts. His stand-up sets are based in stories and simple observations around the world. The guy can look at something you've seen a thousand times but never managed to find the humor in. At one point during the interview I was laughing so hard that I could barely ask the next question. I asked Tom how he finds jokes, develops stories for the stage, what he's learned from Chris Rock, and how to turn ordinary observations into comedy. Timestamps: 0:37 How to find jokes 2:03 Why are comedians always annoyed? 7:19 Say the obvious 11:06 What makes a joke land? 13:11 The 250 rep rule 15:07 Chris Rock 19:33 The 4 types of comedians 21:44 Use the audience's discomfort 24:39 The key to good stage presence 32:00 Mall cops and TSA agents 36:50 How to develop a joke 38:56 Stand-up vs. TV writing 49:11 Finding your way into the story 54:08 Punchlines 55:16 What a set list looks like 58:15 Word choice 59:31 Accents 1:03:50 How to start a show 1:08:01 Writing a book Some things he taught me about being funny: 1) The best mindset to bring on stage is silliness. 2) You must have strong opinions. Indifference kills comedy. You can say "this is the best coffee I've ever had" and make it funny. You can say "this is the worst coffee" and make it funny. But "it's fine, I don't care" is never funny. 3) You can tell the difference between a world-class comic and an amateur one by their relationship with silence. Amateur comics get jittery if a few seconds pass without laughter, whereas seasoned comics use it to their advantage. 4) Good word choice matters more than you'd think. "Yanked" is a funnier word than "pulled." Yiddish words are funny. An easy way to pick up on this is to listen to how naturally funny people describe things. 5) How to find jokes? Talk all the time. Talk and talk, and develop the skill of recognizing when something you've said has legs. I've shared the full episode with Tom Segura below. If you'd rather watch on YouTube, or listen on Apple / Spotify, check out the reply tweets. Tom Segura AKA Mr. Ladybug
1:12:39

Tom Segura has been doing stand-up comedy for ~25 years. He's known for his Netflix specials and a TV show called Bad Thoughts. His stand-up sets are based in stories and simple observations around the world. The guy can look at something you've seen a thousand times but never managed to find the humor in. At one point during the interview I was laughing so hard that I could barely ask the next question. I asked Tom how he finds jokes, develops stories for the stage, what he's learned from Chris Rock, and how to turn ordinary observations into comedy. Timestamps: 0:37 How to find jokes 2:03 Why are comedians always annoyed? 7:19 Say the obvious 11:06 What makes a joke land? 13:11 The 250 rep rule 15:07 Chris Rock 19:33 The 4 types of comedians 21:44 Use the audience's discomfort 24:39 The key to good stage presence 32:00 Mall cops and TSA agents 36:50 How to develop a joke 38:56 Stand-up vs. TV writing 49:11 Finding your way into the story 54:08 Punchlines 55:16 What a set list looks like 58:15 Word choice 59:31 Accents 1:03:50 How to start a show 1:08:01 Writing a book Some things he taught me about being funny: 1) The best mindset to bring on stage is silliness. 2) You must have strong opinions. Indifference kills comedy. You can say "this is the best coffee I've ever had" and make it funny. You can say "this is the worst coffee" and make it funny. But "it's fine, I don't care" is never funny. 3) You can tell the difference between a world-class comic and an amateur one by their relationship with silence. Amateur comics get jittery if a few seconds pass without laughter, whereas seasoned comics use it to their advantage. 4) Good word choice matters more than you'd think. "Yanked" is a funnier word than "pulled." Yiddish words are funny. An easy way to pick up on this is to listen to how naturally funny people describe things. 5) How to find jokes? Talk all the time. Talk and talk, and develop the skill of recognizing when something you've said has legs. I've shared the full episode with Tom Segura below. If you'd rather watch on YouTube, or listen on Apple / Spotify, check out the reply tweets. Tom Segura AKA Mr. Ladybug

David Perell

156,301 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 WARNING: THE SPACEX IPO IS THE BIGGEST TRAP OF 2026 Read this post carefully before buying SpaceX shares In 4 days, $SPCX will debut on Nasdaq The biggest IPO in history, with a valuation of around $1.8 trillion You may have noticed that demand has already exceeded $150 billion, while the public float is only 4-5% And I wouldn't rule out the possibility that the stock could easily jump 20-50% in the first days or weeks purely because of FOMO and the limited share supply But after that, the picture could change dramatically! 1. SpaceX didn't use the standard 180-day lock-up Instead, the S-1 includes a phased unlock schedule Insiders, employees, and early investors will be able to sell shares in stages starting in August: - August 21 (70 days) - +7% - September 10 (90 days) - +7% - September 25 (105 days) - +7% - October 10 (120 days) - +7% - October 25 (135 days) - +7% 2. On top of that, they removed the profitability requirement and are adding SpaceX to major indexes just 5 days after the IPO, while the usual waiting period is 90 days That forces 401(k) pension funds and passive index funds to buy SpaceX shares at inflated IPO prices and keep holding them throughout any decline 3. On top of that, there are major share releases after the Q2 earnings report (August) and Q3 earnings report (November) If the stock is trading 30% above the IPO price after Q2, a performance bonus will kick in and another +10% will be unlocked This staggered selling structure reduces the chance of one massive crash, but it creates several waves of selling pressure between August and November For comparison: when Meta went public in 2012 (one of the top 3 largest IPO in U.S. history, with a $104 billion valuation) The stock fell more than 60% within a few months after the IPO due to lock-up expirations and market concerns about its ability to monetize its business And there's one very important thing you need to remember! 4. The company is still unprofitable, posting roughly a $4.9 billion net loss in 2025 Passive funds (Nasdaq-100) will become forced buyers, but at the first sign of bad news they'll become forced sellers That's why I'm warning you not to become exit liquidity for insiders and VCs who have already made huge money from private funding rounds In the short term, the IPO looks very attractive for traders who know how to speculate But if you're planning to hold, you need to clearly understand this: August through November could bring serious volatility and a major correction I've said this before, and the cycle is still playing out exactly according to plan Turn on notifications and drop your thoughts below The next phase is gonna be very important
0:45

🚨 WARNING: THE SPACEX IPO IS THE BIGGEST TRAP OF 2026 Read this post carefully before buying SpaceX shares In 4 days, $SPCX will debut on Nasdaq The biggest IPO in history, with a valuation of around $1.8 trillion You may have noticed that demand has already exceeded $150 billion, while the public float is only 4-5% And I wouldn't rule out the possibility that the stock could easily jump 20-50% in the first days or weeks purely because of FOMO and the limited share supply But after that, the picture could change dramatically! 1. SpaceX didn't use the standard 180-day lock-up Instead, the S-1 includes a phased unlock schedule Insiders, employees, and early investors will be able to sell shares in stages starting in August: - August 21 (70 days) - +7% - September 10 (90 days) - +7% - September 25 (105 days) - +7% - October 10 (120 days) - +7% - October 25 (135 days) - +7% 2. On top of that, they removed the profitability requirement and are adding SpaceX to major indexes just 5 days after the IPO, while the usual waiting period is 90 days That forces 401(k) pension funds and passive index funds to buy SpaceX shares at inflated IPO prices and keep holding them throughout any decline 3. On top of that, there are major share releases after the Q2 earnings report (August) and Q3 earnings report (November) If the stock is trading 30% above the IPO price after Q2, a performance bonus will kick in and another +10% will be unlocked This staggered selling structure reduces the chance of one massive crash, but it creates several waves of selling pressure between August and November For comparison: when Meta went public in 2012 (one of the top 3 largest IPO in U.S. history, with a $104 billion valuation) The stock fell more than 60% within a few months after the IPO due to lock-up expirations and market concerns about its ability to monetize its business And there's one very important thing you need to remember! 4. The company is still unprofitable, posting roughly a $4.9 billion net loss in 2025 Passive funds (Nasdaq-100) will become forced buyers, but at the first sign of bad news they'll become forced sellers That's why I'm warning you not to become exit liquidity for insiders and VCs who have already made huge money from private funding rounds In the short term, the IPO looks very attractive for traders who know how to speculate But if you're planning to hold, you need to clearly understand this: August through November could bring serious volatility and a major correction I've said this before, and the cycle is still playing out exactly according to plan Turn on notifications and drop your thoughts below The next phase is gonna be very important

Leni

200,873 次观看 • 1 个月前

The current physical activity guidelines undervalue vigorous activity. Vigorous activity may be 4–9× more potent than moderate activity for reducing all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer risk. The exercise guidelines assume a 2:1 ratio between moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity: two minutes of moderate activity equals one minute of vigorous. That's why the recommendations are 150–300 minutes of moderate or 75–150 minutes of vigorous activity each week. But new data suggest that ratio is wrong. In this brand-new journal-club episode, Brady Holmer (Brady Holmer) and I unpack a groundbreaking study that should change how we think about activity for disease prevention. The research identified that 1 minute of vigorous activity is roughly equivalent to 4–9 minutes of moderate activity, and 53–94 minutes of light activity, for disease risk reduction. It also shows a clear dose-response for vigorous activity that’s much weaker for moderate activity and barely detectable for light activity. We also do a deep dive into why vigorous activity is so powerful, the underlying mechanisms, and discuss practical takeaways, including how even very brief bouts of vigorous movement (think “exercise snacks”) can produce meaningful health benefits. Timestamps are below. You can find links to the episode on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify in the next post. Enjoy! Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:14 - The 1:2 rule for exercise 6:28 - What counts as vigorous? 8:48 - Where exercise guidelines fail 9:32 - Inside the wearable-based study design 15:24 - Vigorous activity—easier than you think? 18:01 - Avoiding healthy user bias 19:12 - A better way to measure exercise 20:58 - Is vigorous 4–10x better? 25:08 - One vigorous min vs. one-hour walk 27:15 - Are light activity's benefits capped? 29:03 - Is vigorous 5x better for your heart? 30:12 - Does zone 2 count as vigorous? 31:24 - Dose-response comparison 32:35 - Vigorous exercise & younger arteries 38:29 - Why aging hearts need intensity 41:22 - Can intensity preserve VO₂ max? 42:40 - Moderate exercise & VO₂ max limits 44:34 - Is vigorous 10x better for diabetes? 51:01 - Why intensity boosts mitochondria 56:11 - Does intense exercise kill tumor cells? 1:02:28 - Hormonal benefits 1:03:19 - Preventing falls with intensity 1:07:49 - Fighting inflammation 1:09:42 - High-intensity training & brain aging 1:11:14 - The 2:1 ratio is out the door 1:13:03 - Could vigorous exercise become a pill? 1:14:21 - Short bursts for longer life 1:18:28 - Can short bouts match full workouts? 1:22:39 - Do wearables undervalue vigorous bursts? 1:25:19 - Can micro-workouts replace the gym? 1:30:23 - Updating exercise guidelines 1:41:48 - Is light activity useless? 1:44:17 - Is vigorous exercise safe for seniors? 1:48:41 - Is HIIT harmful to female hormones? 1:54:18 - Balancing intensity & recovery (80/20 rule) 1:56:43 - Brady’s exercise routine 2:00:30 - Vigorous activity & kids’ brainpower 2:03:27 - Are we undervaluing vigorous exercise? 2:05:16 - Why chasing steps doesn't work
2:10:24

The current physical activity guidelines undervalue vigorous activity. Vigorous activity may be 4–9× more potent than moderate activity for reducing all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer risk. The exercise guidelines assume a 2:1 ratio between moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity: two minutes of moderate activity equals one minute of vigorous. That's why the recommendations are 150–300 minutes of moderate or 75–150 minutes of vigorous activity each week. But new data suggest that ratio is wrong. In this brand-new journal-club episode, Brady Holmer (Brady Holmer) and I unpack a groundbreaking study that should change how we think about activity for disease prevention. The research identified that 1 minute of vigorous activity is roughly equivalent to 4–9 minutes of moderate activity, and 53–94 minutes of light activity, for disease risk reduction. It also shows a clear dose-response for vigorous activity that’s much weaker for moderate activity and barely detectable for light activity. We also do a deep dive into why vigorous activity is so powerful, the underlying mechanisms, and discuss practical takeaways, including how even very brief bouts of vigorous movement (think “exercise snacks”) can produce meaningful health benefits. Timestamps are below. You can find links to the episode on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify in the next post. Enjoy! Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:14 - The 1:2 rule for exercise 6:28 - What counts as vigorous? 8:48 - Where exercise guidelines fail 9:32 - Inside the wearable-based study design 15:24 - Vigorous activity—easier than you think? 18:01 - Avoiding healthy user bias 19:12 - A better way to measure exercise 20:58 - Is vigorous 4–10x better? 25:08 - One vigorous min vs. one-hour walk 27:15 - Are light activity's benefits capped? 29:03 - Is vigorous 5x better for your heart? 30:12 - Does zone 2 count as vigorous? 31:24 - Dose-response comparison 32:35 - Vigorous exercise & younger arteries 38:29 - Why aging hearts need intensity 41:22 - Can intensity preserve VO₂ max? 42:40 - Moderate exercise & VO₂ max limits 44:34 - Is vigorous 10x better for diabetes? 51:01 - Why intensity boosts mitochondria 56:11 - Does intense exercise kill tumor cells? 1:02:28 - Hormonal benefits 1:03:19 - Preventing falls with intensity 1:07:49 - Fighting inflammation 1:09:42 - High-intensity training & brain aging 1:11:14 - The 2:1 ratio is out the door 1:13:03 - Could vigorous exercise become a pill? 1:14:21 - Short bursts for longer life 1:18:28 - Can short bouts match full workouts? 1:22:39 - Do wearables undervalue vigorous bursts? 1:25:19 - Can micro-workouts replace the gym? 1:30:23 - Updating exercise guidelines 1:41:48 - Is light activity useless? 1:44:17 - Is vigorous exercise safe for seniors? 1:48:41 - Is HIIT harmful to female hormones? 1:54:18 - Balancing intensity & recovery (80/20 rule) 1:56:43 - Brady’s exercise routine 2:00:30 - Vigorous activity & kids’ brainpower 2:03:27 - Are we undervaluing vigorous exercise? 2:05:16 - Why chasing steps doesn't work

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

305,962 次观看 • 7 个月前

Media Blackout: Ten News Stories They Chose Not to Tell You This Week - Episode 1 #10 - Alex Jones makes a series of terrifying predictions coming to the West. #9 - John Kerry farts loudly while lecturing about reducing emissions. #8 - Tucker Carlson explains why you’ll never get an apology for what happened during COVID. #7 - Super scary “white lung disease” turns out to be an adverse event of special interest in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine documentation. #6 - Vivek Ramaswamy calls the climate change agenda a “religion” and a “hoax” — and proves Nikki Haley doesn’t know basic Ukraine geography. #5 - 49-year-old develops severe heart problems after new 5G antenna installed. #4 - Robert Kennedy Jr. unmasks the ‘principal villains’ behind the COVID cover-up. #3 - Slovakia shocks the world: new prime Minister rejects signing the WHO pandemic treaty. #2 - Hunter Biden indicted on multiple felony tax charges, including “office expense” deductions for “over-the-hill” strippers. #1 - NZ whistleblower arrested for exposing the truth about the jabs: here’s the data they don’t want you to see. Plus, an exclusive interview with Liz Gunn discussing Barry Young’s arrest and the damning New Zealand COVID-19 vaccine data. Special thanks to Maria Zeee () for doing an incredible job hosting the first episode of Media Blackout! Please repost and follow to support our work — and stay tuned for episode 2 next Sunday! Articles to each story are included in the thread below.
1:02:30

Media Blackout: Ten News Stories They Chose Not to Tell You This Week - Episode 1 #10 - Alex Jones makes a series of terrifying predictions coming to the West. #9 - John Kerry farts loudly while lecturing about reducing emissions. #8 - Tucker Carlson explains why you’ll never get an apology for what happened during COVID. #7 - Super scary “white lung disease” turns out to be an adverse event of special interest in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine documentation. #6 - Vivek Ramaswamy calls the climate change agenda a “religion” and a “hoax” — and proves Nikki Haley doesn’t know basic Ukraine geography. #5 - 49-year-old develops severe heart problems after new 5G antenna installed. #4 - Robert Kennedy Jr. unmasks the ‘principal villains’ behind the COVID cover-up. #3 - Slovakia shocks the world: new prime Minister rejects signing the WHO pandemic treaty. #2 - Hunter Biden indicted on multiple felony tax charges, including “office expense” deductions for “over-the-hill” strippers. #1 - NZ whistleblower arrested for exposing the truth about the jabs: here’s the data they don’t want you to see. Plus, an exclusive interview with Liz Gunn discussing Barry Young’s arrest and the damning New Zealand COVID-19 vaccine data. Special thanks to Maria Zeee () for doing an incredible job hosting the first episode of Media Blackout! Please repost and follow to support our work — and stay tuned for episode 2 next Sunday! Articles to each story are included in the thread below.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,663,114 次观看 • 2 年前

Jared Weinstein is deeply trusted and quietly effective. He is a friend to many. This is his first interview. From President Bush, to Thrive's team and founders, to new leaders building in his hometown of Birmingham and globally, Jared Weinstein is an amplifier of people. We discuss: - Cold-calling the Bush campaign in college, joining them in the run up to 2000, and not dropping out - Becoming the President's personal aide (or "body man") in his mid-20s, what the President does, and how little Jared slept - an unlikely partnership with Joshua Kushner that led to over a decade building the now-legendary Thrive Capital - what it was like helping Palantir in the very early days - Bringing seriousness and humanity to work, whether the West Wing or investing - the three-body problem of ego, ambition, and impact - why people trust Jared and how he helps them become their best selves - east vs. west coast ambition, across DC, SF, and NY - how he's investing in Birmingham, why cities change and thrive, and helping people raise their ambition - championing those who champion you Timestamps: 0:00 - Opening Highlights 1:40 - Intro to Jared 3:32 - Thanks to Notion 4:39 - Start: Being a "Friend" and Bringing Humanity to Serious Work 10:55 - From Duke to the West Wing 31:45 - Riding Shotgun with President Bush 59:27 - Starting Over Out West: Post-WH, Stanford, and Palantir 1:16:05 - Meeting Josh Kushner and Building Thrive Capital 1:44:37 - Founders, Humility, and the Three-Body Problem of Ego, Ambition, and Impact 2:06:41 - Leaving Thrive, Coming Home to Birmingham, and Overton 2:32:40 - Busier Than Ever: Mentors, Life in Acts, and What You Hope to Be Known For Dialectic with Jackson Dahl 44: Jared Weinstein - Within Earshot, Out of Camera Shot - is available below and on all platforms.
2:50:07

Jared Weinstein is deeply trusted and quietly effective. He is a friend to many. This is his first interview. From President Bush, to Thrive's team and founders, to new leaders building in his hometown of Birmingham and globally, Jared Weinstein is an amplifier of people. We discuss: - Cold-calling the Bush campaign in college, joining them in the run up to 2000, and not dropping out - Becoming the President's personal aide (or "body man") in his mid-20s, what the President does, and how little Jared slept - an unlikely partnership with Joshua Kushner that led to over a decade building the now-legendary Thrive Capital - what it was like helping Palantir in the very early days - Bringing seriousness and humanity to work, whether the West Wing or investing - the three-body problem of ego, ambition, and impact - why people trust Jared and how he helps them become their best selves - east vs. west coast ambition, across DC, SF, and NY - how he's investing in Birmingham, why cities change and thrive, and helping people raise their ambition - championing those who champion you Timestamps: 0:00 - Opening Highlights 1:40 - Intro to Jared 3:32 - Thanks to Notion 4:39 - Start: Being a "Friend" and Bringing Humanity to Serious Work 10:55 - From Duke to the West Wing 31:45 - Riding Shotgun with President Bush 59:27 - Starting Over Out West: Post-WH, Stanford, and Palantir 1:16:05 - Meeting Josh Kushner and Building Thrive Capital 1:44:37 - Founders, Humility, and the Three-Body Problem of Ego, Ambition, and Impact 2:06:41 - Leaving Thrive, Coming Home to Birmingham, and Overton 2:32:40 - Busier Than Ever: Mentors, Life in Acts, and What You Hope to Be Known For Dialectic with Jackson Dahl 44: Jared Weinstein - Within Earshot, Out of Camera Shot - is available below and on all platforms.

Jackson Dahl

87,112 次观看 • 2 个月前

Blog 211 Charles Barkley meets Frank Seven years ago to this day, Frank the Tank was born with his famous NJ Transit rant. Today, he was casually talking ball with Charles Barkley. Never give up on your dreams. MikeyBets arrives in NJ late tonight and is covering while I attend my friend’s wedding in Georgia. Frank and I will be separated for 45 hours, the longest stretch apart in about 8 months. The walking streak and videos will remain unbroken with MikeyBets in town. Originally, Frank was going to come with me but shit got too crazy: ◦Tomorrow morning, we film #FrankWalks with Don Mattingly before I head to the airport ◦Friday: MikeyBets and Frank drive to Virginia while I’m at wedding ◦Saturday: reunite with the crew post-vacation (including Ben Klein) in Virginia for a #FrankWalks with a NASCAR legend ◦Sunday: watch race and then drive home through night ◦Monday morning: we film #FrankWalks with Boomer Esiason in Manhattan / Barstool Basketball Game at 8:30 ◦Tuesday-Friday: We head to Chicago where we will film another #FrankWalks with a VERY special guest and other awesome content ◦Wednesday: Allan Houston episode drops ◦Sunday (4/14): Walk 200 with the FDNY & NYPD outside of Citi Field before Dwight Gooden day - all are welcome!!! We will try to fundraise as much as possible for the Widows and Children’s Fund, Friends for Firefighters, G2H Foundation, and FDNY Fire Family Transport. It will be an HONOR to walk with these legends before their 50th annual Heroes Hockey game on 4/20 which we will also attend And then things get crazier … Did I mention Frank Walks? Today, we had a productive NYC HQ day and hit walk 189 in Moynihan Train Hall. Crazy how quick the jump from 100 to 200 feels. As I was filming the walking video, I noticed Charles Barkley standing with a crew of people. We casually walked up, introduced ourselves, explained #FrankWalks, and Charles couldn’t have been nicer. His brief interaction with Frank was priceless and he gave us his assistant’s email to HOPEFULLY set up a #FrankWalks with Sir Charles in the coming months. It is obvious the chemistry is there without even trying. #FrankChuckWalk (let’s make it happen) @NBAonTNT I also can’t emphasize enough how Charles was nice to every single fan who wanted a picture or handshake. He treats everyone equally. He is authentically a man of the people, just like Frank. I am going to be with my friends (since preschool) for the first time in a year, from tomorrow night to Saturday morning, so please excuse a slight blog sabbatical. I am going to try to briefly renter society. I still don’t have a lamp in my room and could only find the top half of one suit and the bottom half of another. My apartment is just a human charging dock at this point. I also haven’t gotten a haircut in almost 2 years. I am furiously trying to prepare for this trip. Make sure to watch Tank in the Wild, new episode dropped today. MikeyBets made another hilarious ep. I’ll be back writing Saturday. Anudder wild road trip loading.
0:45

Blog 211 Charles Barkley meets Frank Seven years ago to this day, Frank the Tank was born with his famous NJ Transit rant. Today, he was casually talking ball with Charles Barkley. Never give up on your dreams. MikeyBets arrives in NJ late tonight and is covering while I attend my friend’s wedding in Georgia. Frank and I will be separated for 45 hours, the longest stretch apart in about 8 months. The walking streak and videos will remain unbroken with MikeyBets in town. Originally, Frank was going to come with me but shit got too crazy: ◦Tomorrow morning, we film #FrankWalks with Don Mattingly before I head to the airport ◦Friday: MikeyBets and Frank drive to Virginia while I’m at wedding ◦Saturday: reunite with the crew post-vacation (including Ben Klein) in Virginia for a #FrankWalks with a NASCAR legend ◦Sunday: watch race and then drive home through night ◦Monday morning: we film #FrankWalks with Boomer Esiason in Manhattan / Barstool Basketball Game at 8:30 ◦Tuesday-Friday: We head to Chicago where we will film another #FrankWalks with a VERY special guest and other awesome content ◦Wednesday: Allan Houston episode drops ◦Sunday (4/14): Walk 200 with the FDNY & NYPD outside of Citi Field before Dwight Gooden day - all are welcome!!! We will try to fundraise as much as possible for the Widows and Children’s Fund, Friends for Firefighters, G2H Foundation, and FDNY Fire Family Transport. It will be an HONOR to walk with these legends before their 50th annual Heroes Hockey game on 4/20 which we will also attend And then things get crazier … Did I mention Frank Walks? Today, we had a productive NYC HQ day and hit walk 189 in Moynihan Train Hall. Crazy how quick the jump from 100 to 200 feels. As I was filming the walking video, I noticed Charles Barkley standing with a crew of people. We casually walked up, introduced ourselves, explained #FrankWalks, and Charles couldn’t have been nicer. His brief interaction with Frank was priceless and he gave us his assistant’s email to HOPEFULLY set up a #FrankWalks with Sir Charles in the coming months. It is obvious the chemistry is there without even trying. #FrankChuckWalk (let’s make it happen) @NBAonTNT I also can’t emphasize enough how Charles was nice to every single fan who wanted a picture or handshake. He treats everyone equally. He is authentically a man of the people, just like Frank. I am going to be with my friends (since preschool) for the first time in a year, from tomorrow night to Saturday morning, so please excuse a slight blog sabbatical. I am going to try to briefly renter society. I still don’t have a lamp in my room and could only find the top half of one suit and the bottom half of another. My apartment is just a human charging dock at this point. I also haven’t gotten a haircut in almost 2 years. I am furiously trying to prepare for this trip. Make sure to watch Tank in the Wild, new episode dropped today. MikeyBets made another hilarious ep. I’ll be back writing Saturday. Anudder wild road trip loading.

Matthew Piper Jenks 🧲

131,886 次观看 • 2 年前

Made $313 → $2,382,780 in 4 Days Using a Claude AI Bot on Polymarket. 26,738 trades. 98% win rate. Full blockchain proof. Every single trade verifiable on-chain. I've made the exact step-by-step guide to build this Claude Polymarket bot from scratch. You've been trading for 3 years. Still red. He gave Claude $313. Woke up rich. Free for 24 hours. To get this Setup guide: 1. Comment "Money" 2. Like and Retweet 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar (so i can DM you) Full 2-hour video tutorial attached. Every single click and command explained. Beginner to running bot. Now let me break down exactly how this works. Save this post. This is the most important trading breakdown you'll ever read. ↓ Let's start with the number that should make you sick. $313. That's what this wallet started with. Not $50,000. Not $10,000. Not even $1,000. $313. Less than your monthly Netflix + Uber Eats + Spotify combined. 4 months later: $2,382,780.80. That's a 7,942x return. While you spent those same 4 months staring at charts, drawing trendlines, panic selling, revenge trading, and ending the month exactly where you started. Minus the $200 you lost on that "sure thing." Same 4 months. Same market. Same opportunities. He had a bot. You had feelings. Guess who won. Save this post right now. What I'm about to explain is the exact mechanism behind every dollar of that $2.38M. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss the rest. ↓ How Polymarket actually works and why bots print money on it. Polymarket is a prediction market. Will BTC be higher in 15 minutes? Yes or No. Will the Fed raise rates? Yes or No. You buy shares between $0 and $1. If you're right, your share settles at $1. If you're wrong, it settles at $0. Simple. Now here's where it gets interesting. Polymarket updates its prices SLOWER than the real market moves. When BTC drops 0.6% on Binance, Polymarket still shows old odds for about 2.7 seconds. 2.7 seconds. In those 2.7 seconds, the bot already knows the outcome. It's not predicting. It's not guessing. It's reading information that already exists and trading before Polymarket catches up. That's not trading. That's collecting free money with a 2.7 second head start. And you're over there using a 15-indicator TradingView setup trying to "predict" where BTC goes next. The bot doesn't predict anything. It just reads faster than you. That's the entire edge. Save this post because if you understand this one concept you understand how millionaires are being made on Polymarket right now. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns like this. ↓ Let me walk you through one single trade. A new 15-minute BTC contract opens on Polymarket. Odds are 50/50. Fair price. 10 minutes in, BTC drops 0.6% on Binance. Hard, fast move. The real probability of BTC being lower at expiry is now about 78%. Polymarket still shows 54/46. The bot sees this instantly. Binance WebSocket feed. Under 50ms latency. The edge is 24 percentage points. On a binary contract, that's basically free money. Bot calculates position size using Kelly Criterion. Executes via Polymarket's API. Done. Within 2-3 seconds, other participants update the odds. 54/46 moves toward 78/22. Bot either exits for immediate profit or holds to resolution. Either way, the trade was entered with near-certainty of a positive outcome. Now repeat this 200-500 times per day. $313 → $2,382,780 in 4 months. Not magic. Not prediction. Not luck. Industrial-scale exploitation of a market inefficiency that still exists today. And you're still placing one manual trade per day and calling yourself a "trader." This is the mechanism behind every single dollar. Bookmark this post so you can study it again. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm breaking down each strategy separately. ↓ There are 4 strategies. Not all Claude bots do the same thing. Strategy 1: Latency Arbitrage. Win rate: 85-98%. What 0x8dxd used. Monitor Binance price feeds. When Polymarket odds lag behind reality by 3-5%, buy the correct side before the market corrects. No forecasting. No model. No sentiment analysis. Pure speed. You're not guessing. You're reading an outcome that has already happened. Strategy 2: Oracle Arbitrage. Win rate: 78-85%. Chainlink oracle price feeds occasionally diverge from Polymarket's implied prices. When they do, the settlement direction is known. Fewer opportunities. Higher certainty when they appear. Strategy 3: News-Driven Trading. Win rate: 60-75%. Claude ingests real-time news. Government filings. Central bank statements. On-chain data. Assesses probability impact before retail traders even finish reading the headline. Lower win rate because interpretation introduces uncertainty. But works on ANY market category, not just crypto. Strategy 4: Market Making. Return: 2-5% per month. Place buy and sell orders on both sides. Capture the spread. No prediction required. Most consistent. Hardest to blow up. Compounds aggressively over time. You didn't even know there were 4 strategies. You thought "trading bot" meant one thing. That's how far behind you are. 4 strategies. 4 different risk profiles. 4 ways to make money while you sleep. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the deep dive into each one. ↓ The timeline that should haunt you. December 2025: Bot launches with $313. Nobody notices. January 6, 2026: Wallet hits ~$438,000. 140x in 30 days. 6,615 predictions. 98% win rate. Finbold reports it. Crypto Twitter explodes. March 10, 2026: Head-to-head test. Claude bot: $1,000 → $14,216 in 48 hours. +1,322%. OpenClaw bot: fully liquidated. Same market. Same timeframe. Claude won because of better risk management. OpenClaw died because it overleveraged. March 16, 2026: Someone trains a swarm model on 3 years of NBA data. Result: +$1.49M on Polymarket. April 2026: 0x8dxd final verified balance: $2,382,780.80. 26,738 trades. 4 months. This all happened while you were "waiting for the right time to start." The right time was December 2025. The second best time is right now. But you'll probably wait until it's too late. That's what you always do. Every date on this timeline is a day you could have started but didn't. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you at least start today. ↓ Why Claude and not ChatGPT? This isn't opinion. It's data. March 2026 head-to-head: Claude bot: +1,322%. OpenClaw (GPT-based): liquidated. Same prompt. Same market. Same conditions. Researchers found Claude's code included: > More defensive edge cases > More conservative default parameters > Better error handling > More legible code for debugging > Proper Kelly Criterion position sizing > Hard drawdown kill switches ChatGPT's code overleveraged into a losing sequence and couldn't recover. Claude's code sized positions conservatively, stopped trading when drawdown thresholds hit, and survived to compound another day. The difference between +1,322% and liquidation wasn't the strategy. It was the risk management. And Claude writes better risk management than ChatGPT. That's not a debate. That's a $15,216 difference in 48 hours. But sure, keep using ChatGPT because "everyone uses it." Everyone's broke too. Coincidence? Stop using the popular tool. Start using the profitable one. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more Claude vs ChatGPT comparisons with real data. ↓ Why humans lose to bots. Every single time. Same strategy. Same market. Same period. Bots: ~$206,000 profit. Humans: ~$100,000 profit. 2x gap. Same strategy. Here's why: 1. Late entries. By the time you identify the lag, verify your reasoning, and click buy, the 2.7 second window is gone. The bot executes in under 100ms. You execute in 30 seconds. The opportunity doesn't exist for 30 seconds. 2. Emotional sizing. You oversize when "confident." Undersize when scared. Exact opposite of Kelly math. The bot sizes based on edge. Every time. No feelings. 3. Fatigue. You make worse decisions at hour 6 than at hour 1. The bot makes the same decision at hour 72 that it made at hour 1. 4. Drawdown psychology. After 3 losses you either panic quit or double down trying to recover. Both destroy capital. The bot has a kill switch. It stops. It doesn't feel anything. You're not competing with other humans anymore. You're competing with machines that don't sleep, don't feel, don't flinch. And you're losing. The data doesn't lie. Humans lose to bots 2x on the same strategy. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the complete bot setup that removes you from the equation. ↓ What can go wrong. Because I'm not going to lie to you. Most people who build this bot will NOT 7,942x their money. Some will lose their initial capital. Here's what can kill you: Edge compression. The arbitrage window was 12 seconds in 2024. It's 2.7 seconds now. It's shrinking. At some point it hits zero for retail operators. This is a time-limited opportunity. Not a permanent income stream. Rule changes. Polymarket can change contract mechanics, settlement rules, or API terms overnight. What worked yesterday can lose money tomorrow. Risk management bugs. A 98% win rate strategy with broken position sizing will blow up your account on the one losing trade. The March 2026 experiment proved this. Claude survived. OpenClaw got liquidated. Same strategy. Different risk management. That's why the 2-hour video tutorial walks through every single risk parameter. Because the strategy doesn't kill you. Bad risk management kills you. This is the section most "gurus" delete. I'm keeping it because I'd rather you make money safely than blow up and blame me. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for honest breakdowns, not hype. ↓ The step-by-step to build your own. Step 1: Set up a Polymarket wallet. Fund with USDC via Polygon network. Start with $100-$300 for testing. Step 2: Generate API credentials. CLOB API key from docs.polymarket .com. Store private key in environment variable. Never hardcode it. Never share it. Step 3: Prompt Claude to build the bot. Use Claude Code for best results. It reads your filesystem, executes code, and iterates on errors autonomously. Step 4: Paper trade for at least one week. Minimum 200 completed trades. Win rate must be above 70% before going live. This step is NOT optional. Step 5: Configure risk management. Max single position: 8% of portfolio. Daily loss limit: -20% with auto halt. Kill switch at -40% drawdown. Telegram alerts on every threshold. Step 6: Go live small. $1-5 per trade. Watch every trade for first week. Compare to paper results. Scale only on evidence. Skip steps 4 and 5 and you will lose your money. That's not a warning. That's a guarantee. This is your complete build guide. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'll be posting the exact Claude prompts for each strategy. ↓ The edge exists right now. Not next month. Not "when you're ready." Right now. The arbitrage window is 2.7 seconds. It was 12 seconds in 2024. It's shrinking every week. Every day you wait, more bots enter the space. The window gets smaller. Your potential returns get smaller. The bots already running have a compounding advantage. They're making money today that they'll use to make more money tomorrow. You're reading about it and telling yourself "I'll look into this next weekend." That's what you said last weekend. And the weekend before that. The best time to start was 6 months ago. The second best time is today. But you already know you're going to bookmark this and never open it again. Prove me wrong. ↓ Full 2-hour video tutorial attached. Every single click. Every command. Every parameter. From zero to running bot. Beginner friendly. Nothing skipped. A similar bot has already earned $2,382,780. Full blockchain proof in the article below. The video is free. The tools are free. The edge still exists. The only thing that costs money is another month of doing nothing while bots eat every opportunity you're too slow to catch. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the complete series covering every automated income stream using Claude. Prediction markets are just the beginning. Save this post. Bookmark it. Screenshot it. Whatever you need to do so you actually watch the video and build the bot instead of just reading about people who did. You Must Follow me Himanshu Kumar, so i can send you DM.
2:22:35

Made $313 → $2,382,780 in 4 Days Using a Claude AI Bot on Polymarket. 26,738 trades. 98% win rate. Full blockchain proof. Every single trade verifiable on-chain. I've made the exact step-by-step guide to build this Claude Polymarket bot from scratch. You've been trading for 3 years. Still red. He gave Claude $313. Woke up rich. Free for 24 hours. To get this Setup guide: 1. Comment "Money" 2. Like and Retweet 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar (so i can DM you) Full 2-hour video tutorial attached. Every single click and command explained. Beginner to running bot. Now let me break down exactly how this works. Save this post. This is the most important trading breakdown you'll ever read. ↓ Let's start with the number that should make you sick. $313. That's what this wallet started with. Not $50,000. Not $10,000. Not even $1,000. $313. Less than your monthly Netflix + Uber Eats + Spotify combined. 4 months later: $2,382,780.80. That's a 7,942x return. While you spent those same 4 months staring at charts, drawing trendlines, panic selling, revenge trading, and ending the month exactly where you started. Minus the $200 you lost on that "sure thing." Same 4 months. Same market. Same opportunities. He had a bot. You had feelings. Guess who won. Save this post right now. What I'm about to explain is the exact mechanism behind every dollar of that $2.38M. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss the rest. ↓ How Polymarket actually works and why bots print money on it. Polymarket is a prediction market. Will BTC be higher in 15 minutes? Yes or No. Will the Fed raise rates? Yes or No. You buy shares between $0 and $1. If you're right, your share settles at $1. If you're wrong, it settles at $0. Simple. Now here's where it gets interesting. Polymarket updates its prices SLOWER than the real market moves. When BTC drops 0.6% on Binance, Polymarket still shows old odds for about 2.7 seconds. 2.7 seconds. In those 2.7 seconds, the bot already knows the outcome. It's not predicting. It's not guessing. It's reading information that already exists and trading before Polymarket catches up. That's not trading. That's collecting free money with a 2.7 second head start. And you're over there using a 15-indicator TradingView setup trying to "predict" where BTC goes next. The bot doesn't predict anything. It just reads faster than you. That's the entire edge. Save this post because if you understand this one concept you understand how millionaires are being made on Polymarket right now. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns like this. ↓ Let me walk you through one single trade. A new 15-minute BTC contract opens on Polymarket. Odds are 50/50. Fair price. 10 minutes in, BTC drops 0.6% on Binance. Hard, fast move. The real probability of BTC being lower at expiry is now about 78%. Polymarket still shows 54/46. The bot sees this instantly. Binance WebSocket feed. Under 50ms latency. The edge is 24 percentage points. On a binary contract, that's basically free money. Bot calculates position size using Kelly Criterion. Executes via Polymarket's API. Done. Within 2-3 seconds, other participants update the odds. 54/46 moves toward 78/22. Bot either exits for immediate profit or holds to resolution. Either way, the trade was entered with near-certainty of a positive outcome. Now repeat this 200-500 times per day. $313 → $2,382,780 in 4 months. Not magic. Not prediction. Not luck. Industrial-scale exploitation of a market inefficiency that still exists today. And you're still placing one manual trade per day and calling yourself a "trader." This is the mechanism behind every single dollar. Bookmark this post so you can study it again. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm breaking down each strategy separately. ↓ There are 4 strategies. Not all Claude bots do the same thing. Strategy 1: Latency Arbitrage. Win rate: 85-98%. What 0x8dxd used. Monitor Binance price feeds. When Polymarket odds lag behind reality by 3-5%, buy the correct side before the market corrects. No forecasting. No model. No sentiment analysis. Pure speed. You're not guessing. You're reading an outcome that has already happened. Strategy 2: Oracle Arbitrage. Win rate: 78-85%. Chainlink oracle price feeds occasionally diverge from Polymarket's implied prices. When they do, the settlement direction is known. Fewer opportunities. Higher certainty when they appear. Strategy 3: News-Driven Trading. Win rate: 60-75%. Claude ingests real-time news. Government filings. Central bank statements. On-chain data. Assesses probability impact before retail traders even finish reading the headline. Lower win rate because interpretation introduces uncertainty. But works on ANY market category, not just crypto. Strategy 4: Market Making. Return: 2-5% per month. Place buy and sell orders on both sides. Capture the spread. No prediction required. Most consistent. Hardest to blow up. Compounds aggressively over time. You didn't even know there were 4 strategies. You thought "trading bot" meant one thing. That's how far behind you are. 4 strategies. 4 different risk profiles. 4 ways to make money while you sleep. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the deep dive into each one. ↓ The timeline that should haunt you. December 2025: Bot launches with $313. Nobody notices. January 6, 2026: Wallet hits ~$438,000. 140x in 30 days. 6,615 predictions. 98% win rate. Finbold reports it. Crypto Twitter explodes. March 10, 2026: Head-to-head test. Claude bot: $1,000 → $14,216 in 48 hours. +1,322%. OpenClaw bot: fully liquidated. Same market. Same timeframe. Claude won because of better risk management. OpenClaw died because it overleveraged. March 16, 2026: Someone trains a swarm model on 3 years of NBA data. Result: +$1.49M on Polymarket. April 2026: 0x8dxd final verified balance: $2,382,780.80. 26,738 trades. 4 months. This all happened while you were "waiting for the right time to start." The right time was December 2025. The second best time is right now. But you'll probably wait until it's too late. That's what you always do. Every date on this timeline is a day you could have started but didn't. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you at least start today. ↓ Why Claude and not ChatGPT? This isn't opinion. It's data. March 2026 head-to-head: Claude bot: +1,322%. OpenClaw (GPT-based): liquidated. Same prompt. Same market. Same conditions. Researchers found Claude's code included: > More defensive edge cases > More conservative default parameters > Better error handling > More legible code for debugging > Proper Kelly Criterion position sizing > Hard drawdown kill switches ChatGPT's code overleveraged into a losing sequence and couldn't recover. Claude's code sized positions conservatively, stopped trading when drawdown thresholds hit, and survived to compound another day. The difference between +1,322% and liquidation wasn't the strategy. It was the risk management. And Claude writes better risk management than ChatGPT. That's not a debate. That's a $15,216 difference in 48 hours. But sure, keep using ChatGPT because "everyone uses it." Everyone's broke too. Coincidence? Stop using the popular tool. Start using the profitable one. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more Claude vs ChatGPT comparisons with real data. ↓ Why humans lose to bots. Every single time. Same strategy. Same market. Same period. Bots: ~$206,000 profit. Humans: ~$100,000 profit. 2x gap. Same strategy. Here's why: 1. Late entries. By the time you identify the lag, verify your reasoning, and click buy, the 2.7 second window is gone. The bot executes in under 100ms. You execute in 30 seconds. The opportunity doesn't exist for 30 seconds. 2. Emotional sizing. You oversize when "confident." Undersize when scared. Exact opposite of Kelly math. The bot sizes based on edge. Every time. No feelings. 3. Fatigue. You make worse decisions at hour 6 than at hour 1. The bot makes the same decision at hour 72 that it made at hour 1. 4. Drawdown psychology. After 3 losses you either panic quit or double down trying to recover. Both destroy capital. The bot has a kill switch. It stops. It doesn't feel anything. You're not competing with other humans anymore. You're competing with machines that don't sleep, don't feel, don't flinch. And you're losing. The data doesn't lie. Humans lose to bots 2x on the same strategy. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the complete bot setup that removes you from the equation. ↓ What can go wrong. Because I'm not going to lie to you. Most people who build this bot will NOT 7,942x their money. Some will lose their initial capital. Here's what can kill you: Edge compression. The arbitrage window was 12 seconds in 2024. It's 2.7 seconds now. It's shrinking. At some point it hits zero for retail operators. This is a time-limited opportunity. Not a permanent income stream. Rule changes. Polymarket can change contract mechanics, settlement rules, or API terms overnight. What worked yesterday can lose money tomorrow. Risk management bugs. A 98% win rate strategy with broken position sizing will blow up your account on the one losing trade. The March 2026 experiment proved this. Claude survived. OpenClaw got liquidated. Same strategy. Different risk management. That's why the 2-hour video tutorial walks through every single risk parameter. Because the strategy doesn't kill you. Bad risk management kills you. This is the section most "gurus" delete. I'm keeping it because I'd rather you make money safely than blow up and blame me. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for honest breakdowns, not hype. ↓ The step-by-step to build your own. Step 1: Set up a Polymarket wallet. Fund with USDC via Polygon network. Start with $100-$300 for testing. Step 2: Generate API credentials. CLOB API key from docs.polymarket .com. Store private key in environment variable. Never hardcode it. Never share it. Step 3: Prompt Claude to build the bot. Use Claude Code for best results. It reads your filesystem, executes code, and iterates on errors autonomously. Step 4: Paper trade for at least one week. Minimum 200 completed trades. Win rate must be above 70% before going live. This step is NOT optional. Step 5: Configure risk management. Max single position: 8% of portfolio. Daily loss limit: -20% with auto halt. Kill switch at -40% drawdown. Telegram alerts on every threshold. Step 6: Go live small. $1-5 per trade. Watch every trade for first week. Compare to paper results. Scale only on evidence. Skip steps 4 and 5 and you will lose your money. That's not a warning. That's a guarantee. This is your complete build guide. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'll be posting the exact Claude prompts for each strategy. ↓ The edge exists right now. Not next month. Not "when you're ready." Right now. The arbitrage window is 2.7 seconds. It was 12 seconds in 2024. It's shrinking every week. Every day you wait, more bots enter the space. The window gets smaller. Your potential returns get smaller. The bots already running have a compounding advantage. They're making money today that they'll use to make more money tomorrow. You're reading about it and telling yourself "I'll look into this next weekend." That's what you said last weekend. And the weekend before that. The best time to start was 6 months ago. The second best time is today. But you already know you're going to bookmark this and never open it again. Prove me wrong. ↓ Full 2-hour video tutorial attached. Every single click. Every command. Every parameter. From zero to running bot. Beginner friendly. Nothing skipped. A similar bot has already earned $2,382,780. Full blockchain proof in the article below. The video is free. The tools are free. The edge still exists. The only thing that costs money is another month of doing nothing while bots eat every opportunity you're too slow to catch. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the complete series covering every automated income stream using Claude. Prediction markets are just the beginning. Save this post. Bookmark it. Screenshot it. Whatever you need to do so you actually watch the video and build the bot instead of just reading about people who did. You Must Follow me Himanshu Kumar, so i can send you DM.

Himanshu Kumar

52,808 次观看 • 3 个月前

I've been asked to review and provide thoughts on the question of a potential targeting call in the Hardin-Simmons Cowboy Football / UMHB Football🏈 #d3fb game Saturday. I have synced up two videos -- one from UMHB's broadcast and one posted by In The (D3FB) Huddle contributor Riley Conlee (Riley Conlee) (if he could provide credit to the videographer of it, I'd appreciate it). There is a full-speed view and a 20% speed view of the central action included in the video. To evaluate targeting, we have to review both aspects of the rule to see what, if anything, qualifies. I want to provide the entire set of rules (9-1-3 & 9-1-4): "Targeting and Making Forcible Contact With the Crown of the Helmet ARTICLE 3. No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of their helmet. The crown of the helmet is the top segment of the helmet; namely, the circular area defined by a 6-inch radius from the apex (top) of the helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 9-6) (A.R. 9-1-3-I) Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI) Note 1: “Targeting” means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to: - Launch. A player leaving their feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area. - A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground. - Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area. - Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet. Note 2: Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14). When in question, a player is defenseless. Examples of defenseless players include but are not limited to: - A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass. This includes an offensive player in a passing posture with focus downfield. - A receiver attempting to catch a forward pass or in position to receive a backward pass, or one who has completed a catch and has not had time to protect themselves or has not clearly become a ball carrier. - A kicker in the act of or just after kicking a ball, or during the kick or the return. - A kick returner attempting to catch or recover a kick, or one who has completed a catch or recovery and has not had time to protect themselves or has not clearly become a ball carrier. - A player on the ground. - A player obviously out of the play. - A player who receives a blind-side block. - A ball carrier already in the grasp of an opponent and whose forward progress has been stopped. - A quarterback any time after a change of possession - A ball carrier who has obviously given themselves up and is sliding feet- first. - A player attempting to recover a loose ball." We need to start at Note 2 to see if Kyle Brown qualified here as a "defenseless player." If not, then 9-1-4 would not apply to him here. Kyle was not a receiver or a passer per se here -- he was clearly a runner downfield and was not in the grasp of any player. As a result, he was not "defenseless" by definition. That means that the only way targeting can be called here is if the provisions of Rule 9-1-3 were violated. Rule 9-1-3 is VERY specific about the initial requirement before we can go to the question of a required indicator: "No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of their helmet." The crown of the helmet is "the top segment of the helmet, specifically the circular area with a 6-inch radius from the apex (top) of the helmet." In the videos, we see a couple of telling signs. First, Kyle appeared to actually lower HIS helmet as the contact became imminent, which is something coaches advise against for a variety of reasons, including self-preservation. But what is telling is that the UMHB defender attempted to peel off as he saw the angle of the contact he was heading toward with Brown. Specifically, he appeared to end up perpendicular to Brown, perhaps catching Brown's facemask enough to cause the helmet to fly. Yet, that contact was NOT with the defender's crown. As a result, since Brown was not defenseless by rule and because the crown of the helmet was not used for forcible contact to the head/neck area, the picking up of the flag by the officials was appropriate. That said, I spoke with an official who reviewed the videos without commentary and who landed in the same spot as I did concerning the above. They stated that if immediate replay review was available, crews will generally throw the flag and go to review (here, it likely would have been overturned by review, preserving the defender's eligibility). Since the ASC is not providing the on-field replay review yet, the officials' decision would have impacted the game by ejecting a player for the last 6 minutes of the first half until a Halftime review would have been available. For those wondering about how replay is impacting the game, I think this is a good reminder of the nuances it can impact.
0:24

I've been asked to review and provide thoughts on the question of a potential targeting call in the Hardin-Simmons Cowboy Football / UMHB Football🏈 #d3fb game Saturday. I have synced up two videos -- one from UMHB's broadcast and one posted by In The (D3FB) Huddle contributor Riley Conlee (Riley Conlee) (if he could provide credit to the videographer of it, I'd appreciate it). There is a full-speed view and a 20% speed view of the central action included in the video. To evaluate targeting, we have to review both aspects of the rule to see what, if anything, qualifies. I want to provide the entire set of rules (9-1-3 & 9-1-4): "Targeting and Making Forcible Contact With the Crown of the Helmet ARTICLE 3. No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of their helmet. The crown of the helmet is the top segment of the helmet; namely, the circular area defined by a 6-inch radius from the apex (top) of the helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 9-6) (A.R. 9-1-3-I) Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI) Note 1: “Targeting” means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to: - Launch. A player leaving their feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area. - A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground. - Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area. - Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet. Note 2: Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14). When in question, a player is defenseless. Examples of defenseless players include but are not limited to: - A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass. This includes an offensive player in a passing posture with focus downfield. - A receiver attempting to catch a forward pass or in position to receive a backward pass, or one who has completed a catch and has not had time to protect themselves or has not clearly become a ball carrier. - A kicker in the act of or just after kicking a ball, or during the kick or the return. - A kick returner attempting to catch or recover a kick, or one who has completed a catch or recovery and has not had time to protect themselves or has not clearly become a ball carrier. - A player on the ground. - A player obviously out of the play. - A player who receives a blind-side block. - A ball carrier already in the grasp of an opponent and whose forward progress has been stopped. - A quarterback any time after a change of possession - A ball carrier who has obviously given themselves up and is sliding feet- first. - A player attempting to recover a loose ball." We need to start at Note 2 to see if Kyle Brown qualified here as a "defenseless player." If not, then 9-1-4 would not apply to him here. Kyle was not a receiver or a passer per se here -- he was clearly a runner downfield and was not in the grasp of any player. As a result, he was not "defenseless" by definition. That means that the only way targeting can be called here is if the provisions of Rule 9-1-3 were violated. Rule 9-1-3 is VERY specific about the initial requirement before we can go to the question of a required indicator: "No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of their helmet." The crown of the helmet is "the top segment of the helmet, specifically the circular area with a 6-inch radius from the apex (top) of the helmet." In the videos, we see a couple of telling signs. First, Kyle appeared to actually lower HIS helmet as the contact became imminent, which is something coaches advise against for a variety of reasons, including self-preservation. But what is telling is that the UMHB defender attempted to peel off as he saw the angle of the contact he was heading toward with Brown. Specifically, he appeared to end up perpendicular to Brown, perhaps catching Brown's facemask enough to cause the helmet to fly. Yet, that contact was NOT with the defender's crown. As a result, since Brown was not defenseless by rule and because the crown of the helmet was not used for forcible contact to the head/neck area, the picking up of the flag by the officials was appropriate. That said, I spoke with an official who reviewed the videos without commentary and who landed in the same spot as I did concerning the above. They stated that if immediate replay review was available, crews will generally throw the flag and go to review (here, it likely would have been overturned by review, preserving the defender's eligibility). Since the ASC is not providing the on-field replay review yet, the officials' decision would have impacted the game by ejecting a player for the last 6 minutes of the first half until a Halftime review would have been available. For those wondering about how replay is impacting the game, I think this is a good reminder of the nuances it can impact.

Frank Rossi

10,688 次观看 • 8 个月前

Player Profile: Khanyisa Mayo[27]📝 Position: RW/RF/CF Foot: Left Club: Kaizer Chiefs FC Kaizer Chiefs has made another bold move in adding quality to the teams attack. Khanyisa Mayo provides immediate and long-term attacking solutions for the club on the right. 1. Technical Qualities Mayo is a skillful, left-footed attacker with a profile built for modern, high-intensity attacking football. ■ A very direct winger, always looking to advance play instead of recycling possession. ■ Excellent at carrying the ball through pressure, breaking lines, and forcing defenders into retreat. ■ His dribbling and progressive runs add verticality to the team’s attacking structure. Shooting and Passing: ■ Strong shooting range when cutting inside from the right. He provides that unpredictability to the attack with his quality to strike the ball from range. Consistently attempts to feed the box: goals, assists, and key passes. A finisher and creator between the lines. Positional Versatility: ■ In a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1, his best role is as the right forward or right winger, cutting inside to shoot or combine. He can also be effective stretching play and still carry goal threat and creativity. ■ As a No. 9: While not his best role, he is capable of leading the line. He uses his pace to run in behind. He can compete but lacks the physicality to hold off defenders, though his finishing is good. ■ As a Second Striker[442]: A role that plays better to his strengths than as a 9. He is comfortable operating between the lines, combining with midfielders and a traditional box striker. His mobility, creativity, and shooting ability allow him to function as the link player, collecting the ball, supporting the primary striker, and creating or finishing opportunities. This ability to operate both wide and centrally makes him tactically flexible, giving Chiefs options in various attacking structures. 2. Physical Attributes ■ Pace & Explosiveness: Quick acceleration makes him a constant outlet for balls in behind. ■ Strength & Balance: He is strong enough to hold off fullbacks, sustaining attacking sequences under pressure ■ High Intensity: Matches the tempo of Chiefs’ pressing and counter-pressing game. We do most actions with a lot of intensity, and his explosive nature will be very much welcomed in our attack. 3. Tactical Fit at Chiefs Under Coach Nabi, Chiefs are shaping into a side that plays with directness, intensity, and aggression across all phases of play: ■ Pressing & Counter-Pressing: The team applies immediate pressure after losing the ball. Mayo’s speed, defensive work rate, and forward momentum align seamlessly with this system. ■ High-Tempo Attacking: Chiefs don’t rely on slow possession. Attacks are vertical, sharp, and quick. Mayo’s instinct to drive forward, dribble at defenders, and attack space makes him an ideal fit. ■ Attacking Personality: His ability to provide not just progression but also the final goal, final pass, and decisive action elevates Chiefs’ attacking efficiency. Mayo’s game is inherently aligned with protagonist football: high tempo, forward intent, and productivity. 4. Experiential Value ■ Continental Experience: Spent a season in Algeria with CR Belouizdad, scoring 6 goals from wide positions. Notable not just for the numbers but for adapting to a challenging cultural and tactical environment. ■ Tactical Growth: North African teams are disciplined and organized, with compact defenses and structured pressing. Mayo sharpened his decision-making, spatial awareness, and ability to operate against tight blocks, preparing him for high-level CAF competitions. ■ Mentality: At 27, he blends maturity with hunger. His willingness to take risks reflects confidence and attacking intent. Yet to reach his peak, now is the perfect time to step up, showing the quality glimpsed at Cape Town City. Mayo joins Chiefs as both a system player and a game-changer. A top signing by the Glamour Boys! 📝
2:00

Player Profile: Khanyisa Mayo[27]📝 Position: RW/RF/CF Foot: Left Club: Kaizer Chiefs FC Kaizer Chiefs has made another bold move in adding quality to the teams attack. Khanyisa Mayo provides immediate and long-term attacking solutions for the club on the right. 1. Technical Qualities Mayo is a skillful, left-footed attacker with a profile built for modern, high-intensity attacking football. ■ A very direct winger, always looking to advance play instead of recycling possession. ■ Excellent at carrying the ball through pressure, breaking lines, and forcing defenders into retreat. ■ His dribbling and progressive runs add verticality to the team’s attacking structure. Shooting and Passing: ■ Strong shooting range when cutting inside from the right. He provides that unpredictability to the attack with his quality to strike the ball from range. Consistently attempts to feed the box: goals, assists, and key passes. A finisher and creator between the lines. Positional Versatility: ■ In a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1, his best role is as the right forward or right winger, cutting inside to shoot or combine. He can also be effective stretching play and still carry goal threat and creativity. ■ As a No. 9: While not his best role, he is capable of leading the line. He uses his pace to run in behind. He can compete but lacks the physicality to hold off defenders, though his finishing is good. ■ As a Second Striker[442]: A role that plays better to his strengths than as a 9. He is comfortable operating between the lines, combining with midfielders and a traditional box striker. His mobility, creativity, and shooting ability allow him to function as the link player, collecting the ball, supporting the primary striker, and creating or finishing opportunities. This ability to operate both wide and centrally makes him tactically flexible, giving Chiefs options in various attacking structures. 2. Physical Attributes ■ Pace & Explosiveness: Quick acceleration makes him a constant outlet for balls in behind. ■ Strength & Balance: He is strong enough to hold off fullbacks, sustaining attacking sequences under pressure ■ High Intensity: Matches the tempo of Chiefs’ pressing and counter-pressing game. We do most actions with a lot of intensity, and his explosive nature will be very much welcomed in our attack. 3. Tactical Fit at Chiefs Under Coach Nabi, Chiefs are shaping into a side that plays with directness, intensity, and aggression across all phases of play: ■ Pressing & Counter-Pressing: The team applies immediate pressure after losing the ball. Mayo’s speed, defensive work rate, and forward momentum align seamlessly with this system. ■ High-Tempo Attacking: Chiefs don’t rely on slow possession. Attacks are vertical, sharp, and quick. Mayo’s instinct to drive forward, dribble at defenders, and attack space makes him an ideal fit. ■ Attacking Personality: His ability to provide not just progression but also the final goal, final pass, and decisive action elevates Chiefs’ attacking efficiency. Mayo’s game is inherently aligned with protagonist football: high tempo, forward intent, and productivity. 4. Experiential Value ■ Continental Experience: Spent a season in Algeria with CR Belouizdad, scoring 6 goals from wide positions. Notable not just for the numbers but for adapting to a challenging cultural and tactical environment. ■ Tactical Growth: North African teams are disciplined and organized, with compact defenses and structured pressing. Mayo sharpened his decision-making, spatial awareness, and ability to operate against tight blocks, preparing him for high-level CAF competitions. ■ Mentality: At 27, he blends maturity with hunger. His willingness to take risks reflects confidence and attacking intent. Yet to reach his peak, now is the perfect time to step up, showing the quality glimpsed at Cape Town City. Mayo joins Chiefs as both a system player and a game-changer. A top signing by the Glamour Boys! 📝

El Capitano⚪

87,172 次观看 • 10 个月前

THE OVERDUE TRUTH ABOUT THE #MeToo CAMPAIGN "#MeToo was always just another movement of discrimination against White males…and I’m tired of pretending otherwise." - Joel Webbon A lot of things haven't been reckoned with in the Trump era, and one of those things is the truth about the #Metoo movement. The movement first arose by that name on October 15, 2017, from an Alyssa Milano tweet calling on her followers to start using the hashtag (pictured below). But the story starts long before that, which you'll see by the time I'm done. ******* INTRODUCTION While the #Metoo movement was broadly an attack on White men as Joel says—or at least men perceived to be White—there was actually something deeper & more specific going on. First, the vast majority of the accused were actually jewish men, which can be seen in the data and which was even acknowledged by Larry David in a famous Saturday Night Live monologue (both attached below). In this way, the sins of jewish men were scapegoated onto White men. Joel is correct here. But there's WAY more to the story. It was always about isolating and attacking one White man in particular—and that leads us to the second purpose of the #metoo campaign, which culminated in attacks on President Trump and calls for congress to investigate his history of sexual impropriety and for Trump to resign. By the end of 2017, 152 House Democrats had signed onto the effort to officially investigate Donald Trump. This was organized and sponsored by Congresswoman Lois Frankel (✡️), chair of the Democratic Women’s Working Group. And this was always the end-game of the #Metoo movement: constant negative press against Donald Trump to hobble his presidency and, because the Democrats didn't yet control the House (and could not therefore impeach him), to eventually force him to resign. But to see how and why Trump was always the target of #MeToo, we have to rewind the clock. ******* THE PRE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN AGAINST DONALD TRUMP: EARLY TIMELINE OF THE #MeToo PSYOP Prior to the successful election of Trump in November 2016, the Left-wing media had tried to torpedo him with various allegations about sexual impropriety. ▪️May 14, 2016: The New York Times publishes the article "Crossing the Line: How Donald Trump Behaved with Women in Private." This was a lengthy exposé of Trump's alleged history of sexual exploitation based on interviews the Times conducted with 50 women! ▪️October 8, 2016: The Washington Post publishes the infamous Access Hollywood/Billy Bush leak where Trump said, "When you're a star, they let you do it, you can do anything...grab them by the p*ssy. You can do anything." This launched what can only be described as an all-out war on Trump throughout October 2016 to sink his election chances. You can look up the specific allegations for each, but here is the summary: ▪️October 12, 2016: New York Times. Jessica Leeds, Rachel Crooks. ▪️October 13, 2016: The Huffington Post. Lisa Boyne. ▪️October 13, 2016. NBC News. Temple Taggart McDowell. ▪️October 14, 2016: WaPo. Kristin Anderson. ▪️October 15, 2016: The Guardian. Cathy Heller. ▪️October 23, 2016: The Guardian. Stacey Williams (with an Epstein twist). ▪️October 30, 2016: The Daily Mail. Beatrice Keul. ▪️January 18, 2017: Summer Zervos files a lawsuit for how Trump treated her on "The Apprentice" It didn't work. Trump was elected & sworn in anyway. ******* THE POST-ELECTION STRATEGIC SHIFT With Trump elected, their strategy shifted to derailing his agenda and ousting him. But they faced the same problem as before: they couldn't seem to get enough Americans to care about Trump's alleged sins. They just couldn't make it all stick. They had to change tactics. And that is when the #MeToo operation was launched. In order to get Americans to care about Trump's transgressions, they decided to situate Trump against a larger backdrop of a systemic problem & sickness in American society. Trump being the prototypical exemplar. Maybe that would create the groundswell against Trump that was missing? ******* CREATING THE GROUNDSWELL Here are some highlights of the Leftist-aligned media's campaign to demonstrate a systemic sexual abuse problem in America: ▪️February 2017: Susan Fowler publishes her account of sexual harassment and HR failures at Uber. It becomes a major Silicon Valley workplace-culture scandal. ▪️April 2017: The New York Times reports that Fox or Bill O’Reilly had paid about $13 million to settle sexual harassment claims. Fox fires O’Reilly on April 19. ▪️May 2017: Sean "P-Diddy" Combs is sued for sexual harassment. ▪️June 2017: The Bill Cosby sexual assault trial. ▪️June 2017: Silicon Valley VC scandal. Justin Caldbeck of Binary Capital takes leave and later resigns after multiple women accuse him of sexual harassment. ▪️June 2017: Shark Tank's Chris Sacca apologizes for unwanted touching. ▪️July 2017: Dave McClure resigns from 500 Startups after sending inappropriate messages to a job applicant. ▪️July 2017: Mark Canter, Macromedia founder, unwanted sexual propositions ▪️July 2017: Singer R. Kelly and abusive sex cults. ▪️August 2017: Singer Usher, sexual battery with multiple women. ▪️August 2017: Taylor Swift wins her groping trial against former radio DJ David Mueller. ▪️September 2017: SoFi's Mike Cagney resigns due to lawsuit alleging the "frat house" culture he ran leading to systemic sexual harassment at the company. Then the Big Bomb hits in October 2017: Harvey Weinstein ******* HARVEY WEINSTEIN AND PRELUDE TO THE ENDGAME ▪️October 5, 2017: The NYTimes drops the Harvey Weinstein bombshell detailing years of his harassment and settlements. ▪️October 10, 2017: The New Yorker drops more details against Weinstein including newly disclosed rape allegations. ▪️October 15, 2017: #MeToo goes viral after Alyssa Milano's tweet (attached below). ▪️October 22, 2017: Los Angeles Times reports that 38 women accused the director James Toback of sexual harassment. ▪️October 29, 2017: Vanity Fair. Kevin Spacey. ▪️November 4, 2017: Larry David admits on SNL that the majority of offenders are jewish. ▪️November 9, 2017: ABC News. Louis C.K. ▪️November 9, 2017: WaPo. Judge Roy Moore. ▪️November 16, 2017: CBS News. Al Franken. ▪️November 20, 2017: Axios. Charlie Rose. ▪️November 20, 2017: Time Magazine. Representative John Conyers. ▪️November 29, 2017: Minnesota Public Radio News. Matt Lauer. ▪️December 11, 2017: Eater NY. Chef/Businessman Mario Batali. ******* ENDGAME: TRUMP Having spent literally the ENTIRE YEAR creating an artificial, media-driven propaganda campaign, it was time to take the action and attention back to Trump. ▪️December 7, 2017: Axios publishes Quinnipiac polling. 70% of Americans say congress should investigate the allegations against Trump. CNN polling reports that 61% of Americans think the accusations against Trump were mostly true and 50% said he should resign. ▪️December 11, 2017: Rachel Crooks, Jessica Leeds, and Samantha Holvey hold a public press conference calling on congress to investigate Trump. UN Ambassador Nikki Haley backs them up. ▪️December 11, 2017: Reuters publishes TWO articles dredging up many of the previous allegations against Trump. (attached below) ▪️December 11, 2017: On a CNN interview with Christiane Amanpour, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand calls for Trump to resign. ▪️December 12, 2017: Congresswoman Lois Frankel of the Democratic Women's Working Group gathers the signatures of 152 Democrats calling for a congressional investigation. ******* AFTERMATH Ultimately, the #Metoo gambit failed to take down Trump. However, in November 2018, the Democrats retook the House of Representatives. Perhaps the multi-year war on Trump via all the negative sexual allegations played a role in that. In 2019, it seems as though they tried returning to the well. ▪️February 2019: Alva Johnson lawsuit for unwanted kisses from Trump. ▪️June 2019: E. Jean Carroll assault allegations against Trump ▪️October 2019: Barry Levine (✡️) publishes his book "All The President's Women", renewing all the allegations and introducing a new one from Karen Johnson, who alleged Trump groped and kissed her at Mar-a-Lago. ▪️September 2020: Former model Amy Doris accuses Trump of sexual assault. By the end of 2019, the Democrats impeached Trump. None of the sexual assault allegations were used as the basis, though. Isn't that in interesting? Since that era, #MeToo has survived, limping along after being embedded in the social consciousness, but it never maintained or regained that massive prominence it enjoyed in 2017. And I think that's because it was fake. Wind-aided. Total psyop. They pulled the plug after it failed. And now you know the rest of the story. (The pie chart below is the most comprehensive list I know of all the men accused in 2017. When you look at this list and note the main media outlets & journalists that pushed this movement, one group of people stands out above the rest)
0:50

THE OVERDUE TRUTH ABOUT THE #MeToo CAMPAIGN "#MeToo was always just another movement of discrimination against White males…and I’m tired of pretending otherwise." - Joel Webbon A lot of things haven't been reckoned with in the Trump era, and one of those things is the truth about the #Metoo movement. The movement first arose by that name on October 15, 2017, from an Alyssa Milano tweet calling on her followers to start using the hashtag (pictured below). But the story starts long before that, which you'll see by the time I'm done. ******* INTRODUCTION While the #Metoo movement was broadly an attack on White men as Joel says—or at least men perceived to be White—there was actually something deeper & more specific going on. First, the vast majority of the accused were actually jewish men, which can be seen in the data and which was even acknowledged by Larry David in a famous Saturday Night Live monologue (both attached below). In this way, the sins of jewish men were scapegoated onto White men. Joel is correct here. But there's WAY more to the story. It was always about isolating and attacking one White man in particular—and that leads us to the second purpose of the #metoo campaign, which culminated in attacks on President Trump and calls for congress to investigate his history of sexual impropriety and for Trump to resign. By the end of 2017, 152 House Democrats had signed onto the effort to officially investigate Donald Trump. This was organized and sponsored by Congresswoman Lois Frankel (✡️), chair of the Democratic Women’s Working Group. And this was always the end-game of the #Metoo movement: constant negative press against Donald Trump to hobble his presidency and, because the Democrats didn't yet control the House (and could not therefore impeach him), to eventually force him to resign. But to see how and why Trump was always the target of #MeToo, we have to rewind the clock. ******* THE PRE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN AGAINST DONALD TRUMP: EARLY TIMELINE OF THE #MeToo PSYOP Prior to the successful election of Trump in November 2016, the Left-wing media had tried to torpedo him with various allegations about sexual impropriety. ▪️May 14, 2016: The New York Times publishes the article "Crossing the Line: How Donald Trump Behaved with Women in Private." This was a lengthy exposé of Trump's alleged history of sexual exploitation based on interviews the Times conducted with 50 women! ▪️October 8, 2016: The Washington Post publishes the infamous Access Hollywood/Billy Bush leak where Trump said, "When you're a star, they let you do it, you can do anything...grab them by the p*ssy. You can do anything." This launched what can only be described as an all-out war on Trump throughout October 2016 to sink his election chances. You can look up the specific allegations for each, but here is the summary: ▪️October 12, 2016: New York Times. Jessica Leeds, Rachel Crooks. ▪️October 13, 2016: The Huffington Post. Lisa Boyne. ▪️October 13, 2016. NBC News. Temple Taggart McDowell. ▪️October 14, 2016: WaPo. Kristin Anderson. ▪️October 15, 2016: The Guardian. Cathy Heller. ▪️October 23, 2016: The Guardian. Stacey Williams (with an Epstein twist). ▪️October 30, 2016: The Daily Mail. Beatrice Keul. ▪️January 18, 2017: Summer Zervos files a lawsuit for how Trump treated her on "The Apprentice" It didn't work. Trump was elected & sworn in anyway. ******* THE POST-ELECTION STRATEGIC SHIFT With Trump elected, their strategy shifted to derailing his agenda and ousting him. But they faced the same problem as before: they couldn't seem to get enough Americans to care about Trump's alleged sins. They just couldn't make it all stick. They had to change tactics. And that is when the #MeToo operation was launched. In order to get Americans to care about Trump's transgressions, they decided to situate Trump against a larger backdrop of a systemic problem & sickness in American society. Trump being the prototypical exemplar. Maybe that would create the groundswell against Trump that was missing? ******* CREATING THE GROUNDSWELL Here are some highlights of the Leftist-aligned media's campaign to demonstrate a systemic sexual abuse problem in America: ▪️February 2017: Susan Fowler publishes her account of sexual harassment and HR failures at Uber. It becomes a major Silicon Valley workplace-culture scandal. ▪️April 2017: The New York Times reports that Fox or Bill O’Reilly had paid about $13 million to settle sexual harassment claims. Fox fires O’Reilly on April 19. ▪️May 2017: Sean "P-Diddy" Combs is sued for sexual harassment. ▪️June 2017: The Bill Cosby sexual assault trial. ▪️June 2017: Silicon Valley VC scandal. Justin Caldbeck of Binary Capital takes leave and later resigns after multiple women accuse him of sexual harassment. ▪️June 2017: Shark Tank's Chris Sacca apologizes for unwanted touching. ▪️July 2017: Dave McClure resigns from 500 Startups after sending inappropriate messages to a job applicant. ▪️July 2017: Mark Canter, Macromedia founder, unwanted sexual propositions ▪️July 2017: Singer R. Kelly and abusive sex cults. ▪️August 2017: Singer Usher, sexual battery with multiple women. ▪️August 2017: Taylor Swift wins her groping trial against former radio DJ David Mueller. ▪️September 2017: SoFi's Mike Cagney resigns due to lawsuit alleging the "frat house" culture he ran leading to systemic sexual harassment at the company. Then the Big Bomb hits in October 2017: Harvey Weinstein ******* HARVEY WEINSTEIN AND PRELUDE TO THE ENDGAME ▪️October 5, 2017: The NYTimes drops the Harvey Weinstein bombshell detailing years of his harassment and settlements. ▪️October 10, 2017: The New Yorker drops more details against Weinstein including newly disclosed rape allegations. ▪️October 15, 2017: #MeToo goes viral after Alyssa Milano's tweet (attached below). ▪️October 22, 2017: Los Angeles Times reports that 38 women accused the director James Toback of sexual harassment. ▪️October 29, 2017: Vanity Fair. Kevin Spacey. ▪️November 4, 2017: Larry David admits on SNL that the majority of offenders are jewish. ▪️November 9, 2017: ABC News. Louis C.K. ▪️November 9, 2017: WaPo. Judge Roy Moore. ▪️November 16, 2017: CBS News. Al Franken. ▪️November 20, 2017: Axios. Charlie Rose. ▪️November 20, 2017: Time Magazine. Representative John Conyers. ▪️November 29, 2017: Minnesota Public Radio News. Matt Lauer. ▪️December 11, 2017: Eater NY. Chef/Businessman Mario Batali. ******* ENDGAME: TRUMP Having spent literally the ENTIRE YEAR creating an artificial, media-driven propaganda campaign, it was time to take the action and attention back to Trump. ▪️December 7, 2017: Axios publishes Quinnipiac polling. 70% of Americans say congress should investigate the allegations against Trump. CNN polling reports that 61% of Americans think the accusations against Trump were mostly true and 50% said he should resign. ▪️December 11, 2017: Rachel Crooks, Jessica Leeds, and Samantha Holvey hold a public press conference calling on congress to investigate Trump. UN Ambassador Nikki Haley backs them up. ▪️December 11, 2017: Reuters publishes TWO articles dredging up many of the previous allegations against Trump. (attached below) ▪️December 11, 2017: On a CNN interview with Christiane Amanpour, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand calls for Trump to resign. ▪️December 12, 2017: Congresswoman Lois Frankel of the Democratic Women's Working Group gathers the signatures of 152 Democrats calling for a congressional investigation. ******* AFTERMATH Ultimately, the #Metoo gambit failed to take down Trump. However, in November 2018, the Democrats retook the House of Representatives. Perhaps the multi-year war on Trump via all the negative sexual allegations played a role in that. In 2019, it seems as though they tried returning to the well. ▪️February 2019: Alva Johnson lawsuit for unwanted kisses from Trump. ▪️June 2019: E. Jean Carroll assault allegations against Trump ▪️October 2019: Barry Levine (✡️) publishes his book "All The President's Women", renewing all the allegations and introducing a new one from Karen Johnson, who alleged Trump groped and kissed her at Mar-a-Lago. ▪️September 2020: Former model Amy Doris accuses Trump of sexual assault. By the end of 2019, the Democrats impeached Trump. None of the sexual assault allegations were used as the basis, though. Isn't that in interesting? Since that era, #MeToo has survived, limping along after being embedded in the social consciousness, but it never maintained or regained that massive prominence it enjoyed in 2017. And I think that's because it was fake. Wind-aided. Total psyop. They pulled the plug after it failed. And now you know the rest of the story. (The pie chart below is the most comprehensive list I know of all the men accused in 2017. When you look at this list and note the main media outlets & journalists that pushed this movement, one group of people stands out above the rest)

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

61,672 次观看 • 16 天前

🦘🇦🇺My take on Ange Postecoglou. If you disagree, that's fine. Freedom of speech, your opinion might be listened to or not. Mine is, I know by who. That's what I care about. 🌏Postecoglou has coached every age group at national / international level on 3 continents. That's inspirational and commands respect, if he was to be found out, as he said, he'd have been a long time ago like these former pros who cry because they get a U19 team relegated (ask me the names). 🤓From a footballing standpoint, he's not making up theoretical shit like all these nerds jumping up on the Pro License barely coaching a team; and scrambling to figure out the reality of the sport/people in Phase 2, 3 doing the polar opposite to what they told everyone they'd do. 🧠The football Postecoglou sets up has room for decision making within a structure which is an extraordinary achievement from a coaching standpoint, and what every coach in the world should aspire to do. Ajax or Netherlands 1974, Nantes 1995, Rijkaard's Barcelona, Wenger's Arsenal. If you like "good football" , this is good football. If you want to win, pay more and get the best players. The correlation is right there. 🔁There's rotations everywhere (think triangles who tilt, carrier and two options short/long), and players have 2-3 options everytime. The right balance between combinations into feet and third man runs (third man runs are vital - and often forgotten when nerds coach teams and have a control kink) 🫡For that, you need a club culture of empowered players caring about the common good ; and also good enough to act selflessly to what the game demands (and actually execute it). ⚖️The challenge is that bang average off the mill pros do what they're told, can't do most things. And ones who can't do play the solo card - football is an individual sport masquerading as a team sport. 👀I can confidently second guess that the hesitation in collective movement suggest they're thinking in real time and not going "by the book" (which is microwave coaching). 👥How often Postecoglou talks about culture, turning up together for a meal before games. Old school, but actually grounded. This isn't a startup or UberEats. 🧘‍♂️There's a handful of adults coaching Premier League teams. Slot maybe, Howe, Emery, Frank, Glasner, Moyes, McKenna who value the holistic composition of performance: squad chemistry, work ethic, managing people and treating them as adults. Coincidence or not, I rate all of them. Coincidence, they all overperfom with the resources they have. 🚩Defensively, the idea to hold a high line can make sense on the occasion. Most of you don't work in football. People who do know the biggest paradox in the modern age is that lot of players are outstanding to think smart and execute fast in high pressure situations; yet are out of their depth when they have time and space to think. 🫣Chelsea 11v9 took half an hour to break down 9 fuckers on halfway line, and people know how badly it reflected on one of the worst assemblage of players ever seen pound for pound. And that's not Postecoglou's team. Then again, listen to who you want. I've done it too. 9v11 winning 5-2 from 2-1 down at National level whilst the other team was spamming diagonals out of play. 🚑The injury crisis is worrying, but it's also a vicious circle. Majority of clubs nowadays sign players to replace injured players. If you get one or two key players injured by the extreme random demands of the game (facing a Haaland, Jackson etc... stretches your CBs to the limit - Van de Ven got muscular in game injury like Rodri got injured like Fofana got injured). 🚁💰I don't think the training methods are in question; not should they be questioned more than Pep or Maresca's who can actually afford to get replacement brought in (and still get injuries) - and never get questioned. Spurs play Gray at CB. Chelsea can afford to call Chaloback, or City sign another 40 million a piece CB. 🕳️Spurs lost Kane and finished 5th, like nothing happened. That's outstanding. 📼⛳️Training clip: possession box to create the moment to change gear and find a striker dropping off the front. What happens then is a "wave" 3v2, with decision making. Drive diagonally, straight pass for diagonal runs. Affordances (what players perceive they can play) and match realism. See the cut off corners to guarantee runs going towards goal. Can't be more modern, evidence based, empowering, enjoyable and football realistic. 🏟️🎞️Game footage: look how they're using each pass as a timeline to allow a third man popping up in space. Good reaction on turnover. See another triangle being created, with players selflessly filling in the tips of the triangle even rotating. Matar Sarr gets sucked into the space, puts an outstanding goalmouth delivery with presence and bodies in the box - especially at the far post. Brennan who everyone called a flop. Tremendous, organic (= player led) output. What you can do = the team's outlook. ⚽️I'm talking football there, not theory, not pattern playbook, not fiscal optimisation. 📊Spurs are working on relative budget. Don't budget CL football. Spend 40% turnover on wages, when Chelsea's etc... are 70% or Leicester 120%. 🏇💉It's like the only clean horse in a race when others are stuffed with red bull, cocaine and creatine. And some of you Peaky Blinders are looking everywhere - even if you saw the episode where they stuff the horse to make it win.
1:05

🦘🇦🇺My take on Ange Postecoglou. If you disagree, that's fine. Freedom of speech, your opinion might be listened to or not. Mine is, I know by who. That's what I care about. 🌏Postecoglou has coached every age group at national / international level on 3 continents. That's inspirational and commands respect, if he was to be found out, as he said, he'd have been a long time ago like these former pros who cry because they get a U19 team relegated (ask me the names). 🤓From a footballing standpoint, he's not making up theoretical shit like all these nerds jumping up on the Pro License barely coaching a team; and scrambling to figure out the reality of the sport/people in Phase 2, 3 doing the polar opposite to what they told everyone they'd do. 🧠The football Postecoglou sets up has room for decision making within a structure which is an extraordinary achievement from a coaching standpoint, and what every coach in the world should aspire to do. Ajax or Netherlands 1974, Nantes 1995, Rijkaard's Barcelona, Wenger's Arsenal. If you like "good football" , this is good football. If you want to win, pay more and get the best players. The correlation is right there. 🔁There's rotations everywhere (think triangles who tilt, carrier and two options short/long), and players have 2-3 options everytime. The right balance between combinations into feet and third man runs (third man runs are vital - and often forgotten when nerds coach teams and have a control kink) 🫡For that, you need a club culture of empowered players caring about the common good ; and also good enough to act selflessly to what the game demands (and actually execute it). ⚖️The challenge is that bang average off the mill pros do what they're told, can't do most things. And ones who can't do play the solo card - football is an individual sport masquerading as a team sport. 👀I can confidently second guess that the hesitation in collective movement suggest they're thinking in real time and not going "by the book" (which is microwave coaching). 👥How often Postecoglou talks about culture, turning up together for a meal before games. Old school, but actually grounded. This isn't a startup or UberEats. 🧘‍♂️There's a handful of adults coaching Premier League teams. Slot maybe, Howe, Emery, Frank, Glasner, Moyes, McKenna who value the holistic composition of performance: squad chemistry, work ethic, managing people and treating them as adults. Coincidence or not, I rate all of them. Coincidence, they all overperfom with the resources they have. 🚩Defensively, the idea to hold a high line can make sense on the occasion. Most of you don't work in football. People who do know the biggest paradox in the modern age is that lot of players are outstanding to think smart and execute fast in high pressure situations; yet are out of their depth when they have time and space to think. 🫣Chelsea 11v9 took half an hour to break down 9 fuckers on halfway line, and people know how badly it reflected on one of the worst assemblage of players ever seen pound for pound. And that's not Postecoglou's team. Then again, listen to who you want. I've done it too. 9v11 winning 5-2 from 2-1 down at National level whilst the other team was spamming diagonals out of play. 🚑The injury crisis is worrying, but it's also a vicious circle. Majority of clubs nowadays sign players to replace injured players. If you get one or two key players injured by the extreme random demands of the game (facing a Haaland, Jackson etc... stretches your CBs to the limit - Van de Ven got muscular in game injury like Rodri got injured like Fofana got injured). 🚁💰I don't think the training methods are in question; not should they be questioned more than Pep or Maresca's who can actually afford to get replacement brought in (and still get injuries) - and never get questioned. Spurs play Gray at CB. Chelsea can afford to call Chaloback, or City sign another 40 million a piece CB. 🕳️Spurs lost Kane and finished 5th, like nothing happened. That's outstanding. 📼⛳️Training clip: possession box to create the moment to change gear and find a striker dropping off the front. What happens then is a "wave" 3v2, with decision making. Drive diagonally, straight pass for diagonal runs. Affordances (what players perceive they can play) and match realism. See the cut off corners to guarantee runs going towards goal. Can't be more modern, evidence based, empowering, enjoyable and football realistic. 🏟️🎞️Game footage: look how they're using each pass as a timeline to allow a third man popping up in space. Good reaction on turnover. See another triangle being created, with players selflessly filling in the tips of the triangle even rotating. Matar Sarr gets sucked into the space, puts an outstanding goalmouth delivery with presence and bodies in the box - especially at the far post. Brennan who everyone called a flop. Tremendous, organic (= player led) output. What you can do = the team's outlook. ⚽️I'm talking football there, not theory, not pattern playbook, not fiscal optimisation. 📊Spurs are working on relative budget. Don't budget CL football. Spend 40% turnover on wages, when Chelsea's etc... are 70% or Leicester 120%. 🏇💉It's like the only clean horse in a race when others are stuffed with red bull, cocaine and creatine. And some of you Peaky Blinders are looking everywhere - even if you saw the episode where they stuff the horse to make it win.

S.

228,505 次观看 • 1 年前

MALAYSIA rightly prides itself as an open, trading nation Ever wonder though what are some fun, quirky, unusual items entering 🇲🇾's borders? With a h/t to my sporting Ambassador friends, Comtrade & Fionne Lim, here goes: __________ Argentina Malaysia’s polo fields? Not just for show! 🇦🇷 sends M’sia their prized polo ponies to keep the game strong in Selangor, Johor & beyond __________ Australia Next time you’re munching into some roti canai at ur local mamak, u’re likely munching on a slice of 🇦🇺 Over a million tonnes of Aussie wheat roll into Malaysia each year, making up about 2/3rd of this flaky goodness😋 __________ Austria See an airport fire truck? Likely it’s rolling out from 🇦🇹’s Rosenbauer! __________ Belgium Wonder how Msian chocolates are so smooth? Thank 🇧🇪 for that! Their highly refined rice starch is the secret to the glow up __________ Brazil Brazil’s not just about football—it exports halal beef & chicken to M'sia! Who knew 🇧🇷 would develop such a niche market even from the far side of the globe? __________ China 🇨🇳’s unexpected export to Malaysia? Wigs! Mine just got snatched PS: Gen X/Y … if u don’t get this reference, pls ask your closest Gen Z-er friend 😉 __________ Czech Republic Malaysia’s cats are feasting on “Brit” brand cat food, courtesy of 🇨🇿 __________ Egypt Fresh strawberries in Malaysia? Many come from 🇪🇬...berry surprising! __________ Indonesia Msia’s big in natural gas, but guess what? M’sia also imports LNG from 🇮🇩...keeping it in the nbhd! __________ Italy [warning...another Gen Z ref coming up] 🇮🇹's not just sending over pasta & fashion. Think boujee, like helicopters, supercars, superbikes, super-yachts. Super! __________ India Sarees, spices, B'wood songs sure. But 🇮🇳’s also moving games like chess & carrom into M’sia. PS: talking of B'wood songs, check out this memorable performance by PMX showing his B'wood singing chops (from his recent India trip)! __________ Japan M’sians❤️Japan, we all know. But did you know Msia’s the only country where 🇯🇵 exports its dangerously delicious puffer fish for actual consumption? __________ Philippines Jamming to a Siti Nurhaliza tune? You may be strumming on a🎸handcrafted in Cebu, 🇵🇭 __________ Russia Art lovers, you’ve probably used “Master-class” oil paints. You may have brushed your teeth with Splat toothpaste — both from 🇷🇺! __________ Spain 🇪🇸’s quirkiest export to M’sia? One-day-old chicks ready to be raised within M’sian borders! And special spanish charcoal gives M’sian roast beef that yummy extra flavor! __________ Singapore Surprise, surprise—the little red dot’s sharpest export? Contact lenses! Gotta keep a sharp watch across that Causeway 🇸🇬 __________ South Africa CNY isn’t complete without braised abalone, and guess where it’s coming from -- 🇿🇦 has a role! __________ South Korea Kimchi & K-dramas are life (🙋‍♂️if you’ve binged *Crash Landing on You*). But did you know M’sia is one of the top importers of 🇰🇷kimchi, globally? That’s a whole lotta spicy cabbage! __________ Switzerland Got a knee or dental implant? Chances are you got some Swiss precision engineering inside you, courtesy🇨🇭 __________ Sweden Those sleek prefab houses in Kulim? Flat-packed all the way from 🇸🇪! __________ Thailand No fish tale here—the Siamese fighting fish & fancy guppies in M’sia are imports from 🇹🇭! __________ Turkey Craving hazelnuts? While Nutella might be Italian, 🇹🇷’s where the hazelnuts come from, and Msia’s getting its fair share! __________ USA Besides exporting higher interest rates (!), 🇺🇸’ also M’sia’s main soybean supplier, mostly for animal feed. Who knew soybeans had so much range? __________ That's a wrap. Some thoughts... 1. Malaysians sure have some fun & eclectic tastes😊 2. Trading is hardwired into us humans 3. And we ought to keep it that way – encouraging – not discouraging – it 🙏 PS: This list is clearly not exhaustive. So if you know any other quirky or unusual imports, um, spill the tea! END/
0:45

MALAYSIA rightly prides itself as an open, trading nation Ever wonder though what are some fun, quirky, unusual items entering 🇲🇾's borders? With a h/t to my sporting Ambassador friends, Comtrade & Fionne Lim, here goes: __________ Argentina Malaysia’s polo fields? Not just for show! 🇦🇷 sends M’sia their prized polo ponies to keep the game strong in Selangor, Johor & beyond __________ Australia Next time you’re munching into some roti canai at ur local mamak, u’re likely munching on a slice of 🇦🇺 Over a million tonnes of Aussie wheat roll into Malaysia each year, making up about 2/3rd of this flaky goodness😋 __________ Austria See an airport fire truck? Likely it’s rolling out from 🇦🇹’s Rosenbauer! __________ Belgium Wonder how Msian chocolates are so smooth? Thank 🇧🇪 for that! Their highly refined rice starch is the secret to the glow up __________ Brazil Brazil’s not just about football—it exports halal beef & chicken to M'sia! Who knew 🇧🇷 would develop such a niche market even from the far side of the globe? __________ China 🇨🇳’s unexpected export to Malaysia? Wigs! Mine just got snatched PS: Gen X/Y … if u don’t get this reference, pls ask your closest Gen Z-er friend 😉 __________ Czech Republic Malaysia’s cats are feasting on “Brit” brand cat food, courtesy of 🇨🇿 __________ Egypt Fresh strawberries in Malaysia? Many come from 🇪🇬...berry surprising! __________ Indonesia Msia’s big in natural gas, but guess what? M’sia also imports LNG from 🇮🇩...keeping it in the nbhd! __________ Italy [warning...another Gen Z ref coming up] 🇮🇹's not just sending over pasta & fashion. Think boujee, like helicopters, supercars, superbikes, super-yachts. Super! __________ India Sarees, spices, B'wood songs sure. But 🇮🇳’s also moving games like chess & carrom into M’sia. PS: talking of B'wood songs, check out this memorable performance by PMX showing his B'wood singing chops (from his recent India trip)! __________ Japan M’sians❤️Japan, we all know. But did you know Msia’s the only country where 🇯🇵 exports its dangerously delicious puffer fish for actual consumption? __________ Philippines Jamming to a Siti Nurhaliza tune? You may be strumming on a🎸handcrafted in Cebu, 🇵🇭 __________ Russia Art lovers, you’ve probably used “Master-class” oil paints. You may have brushed your teeth with Splat toothpaste — both from 🇷🇺! __________ Spain 🇪🇸’s quirkiest export to M’sia? One-day-old chicks ready to be raised within M’sian borders! And special spanish charcoal gives M’sian roast beef that yummy extra flavor! __________ Singapore Surprise, surprise—the little red dot’s sharpest export? Contact lenses! Gotta keep a sharp watch across that Causeway 🇸🇬 __________ South Africa CNY isn’t complete without braised abalone, and guess where it’s coming from -- 🇿🇦 has a role! __________ South Korea Kimchi & K-dramas are life (🙋‍♂️if you’ve binged *Crash Landing on You*). But did you know M’sia is one of the top importers of 🇰🇷kimchi, globally? That’s a whole lotta spicy cabbage! __________ Switzerland Got a knee or dental implant? Chances are you got some Swiss precision engineering inside you, courtesy🇨🇭 __________ Sweden Those sleek prefab houses in Kulim? Flat-packed all the way from 🇸🇪! __________ Thailand No fish tale here—the Siamese fighting fish & fancy guppies in M’sia are imports from 🇹🇭! __________ Turkey Craving hazelnuts? While Nutella might be Italian, 🇹🇷’s where the hazelnuts come from, and Msia’s getting its fair share! __________ USA Besides exporting higher interest rates (!), 🇺🇸’ also M’sia’s main soybean supplier, mostly for animal feed. Who knew soybeans had so much range? __________ That's a wrap. Some thoughts... 1. Malaysians sure have some fun & eclectic tastes😊 2. Trading is hardwired into us humans 3. And we ought to keep it that way – encouraging – not discouraging – it 🙏 PS: This list is clearly not exhaustive. So if you know any other quirky or unusual imports, um, spill the tea! END/

Apurva Sanghi

20,928 次观看 • 1 年前