Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

373,282 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

33 Comments

Paul's profile picture
Paul3 months ago

Looks like a ghetto Tupolev

Bernoulli's Ghost's profile picture
Bernoulli's Ghost3 months ago

Sweet plane mate, yeah i got the Turbo..... Prop.... The what ?!!!!

Chris DeRosier's profile picture
Chris DeRosier3 months ago

The Kuznetsov NK-12 turboprop engines on the Russian Bear bomber pretty much establishes that contra rotating turboprops exceed the noise tolerance level of the human ear. 🙄🤪

DarkAdapted's profile picture
DarkAdapted3 months ago

1980s era testbed for Unducted Fan (UDF). Didn’t work out at the time. Too loud, concerns about fan breakage. Fuel savings UDFs could update achieve were achieved with other means. Most of those other means (winglets, lower drag wings, higher bypass shrouded turbofans) have been maxed out, so we’re circling back to UDFs again. UDFs are likely making a comeback, but with some changes. The model shown above has 2 contrarotating fans, more modern versions have a row of stators and one fan (quieter). Fan blades are composite now so a blade separation is a bit less dangerous. Better blade design keeps the tips subsonic. Seems crazy but the easiest path to increased fuel efficiency is higher bypass, and there is a declining gain between increasing fan size and increasing nacelle weight and drag.

Ronster's profile picture
Ronster3 months ago

I understand the concept, but it doesn't sound right haha

Gotsumpnferya's profile picture
Gotsumpnferya3 months ago

UDFs might be coming back.

John Dawson's profile picture
John Dawson3 months ago

Saw that fly at Farnborough in 88. Interesting to watch. Bit noisy though.

Mo Fin ✝️🇲🇨🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇯🇲🇻🇨🇵🇳🇪🇺🏝's profile picture
Mo Fin ✝️🇲🇨🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇯🇲🇻🇨🇵🇳🇪🇺🏝3 months ago

That's an Unducted Fan or Propfan. In the 80s they were thought to be the coming thing, but they proved too noisy and not much more economic.

Burrem's profile picture
Burrem3 months ago

I wonder why turboprops isn't used more in short commercial flights, especially now when we need to conserve fuel and become less reliant on dictatorial oil countries and a U.S.A that seems to go hi-wire.

Matrix citizen's profile picture
Matrix citizen3 months ago

Imagine the blade breaking off lol.

Tshaw's profile picture
Tshaw3 months ago

Poverty spec is pretty mean for the hindsight of the oil crisis. Dang fan supremacists

Aristophanes Donitz's profile picture
Aristophanes Donitz3 months ago

At least the GE UDF didn't have a giant dildo glued on the back 😬

William Hutchins's profile picture
William Hutchins3 months ago

Hey That is a Pratt/Allison/Ham Standard affiliation, Those are Hamilton Standard Counter Rotating props. The System was 40% more fuel efficient that the best Gas Turbine. Why did it die? The price of Fuel dropped like a rock. I came to Ham Standard in 1988 tail end of program.

Democracy’s's profile picture
Democracy’s3 months ago

Did I see an up-and-coming new passenger jet with two of these type configurations? Imagine an A320 but with these two (and ginormous) on the wings instead of current configuration. Wild, or maybe I was hallucinating 🤪

MarketWatcher's profile picture
MarketWatcher3 months ago

The vibration from the blade tips would induce early fatigue cracking, especially in the plug

🅷🆃 🅱🆄🅻🅻🅸🅾🅽 Chief Disruptor🥩🩸🪙⚛️🇺🇸✈️'s profile picture
🅷🆃 🅱🆄🅻🅻🅸🅾🅽 Chief Disruptor🥩🩸🪙⚛️🇺🇸✈️3 months ago

It was loud and slow…

Alejandro Brickman's profile picture
Alejandro Brickman3 months ago

MD-80s in that poverty spec always looked like they skipped every optional extra from day one.

J Birch🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸's profile picture
J Birch🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸3 months ago

Probably quiet 😁

Modern Art Masterpiece's profile picture
Modern Art Masterpiece3 months ago

Was that just a single engine? 😱

William Hutchins's profile picture
William Hutchins3 months ago

There were a few issues that had to be ironed out, the slip rings to provide power to the props were wet, lubricated by engine oil (intentional or unintentional I don't recall) but the graphite was making a slurry cutting through the seals, it was slated to be fixed the poof end.

Warden Cliff 🇰🇪🇬🇧's profile picture
Warden Cliff 🇰🇪🇬🇧3 months ago

Hmm. Not a fan.

William Hutchins's profile picture
William Hutchins3 months ago

Fun Fact, Pratt and Witless engineering objected to Ham Standard putting their logo on the side of the engine, that's why everyone thought it was a Pratt system it was not...Uncle Hammy made the Fan! The Barrels were massive Forgings and were machined in CT at Sterling I believe.

Norman J. Korkorski's profile picture
Norman J. Korkorski3 months ago

Temu MD-80

William Hutchins's profile picture
William Hutchins3 months ago

Fun Fact Ham Standard and Sumitomo Heavy industries made components to create a hydraulic actuated UDF, and an Electric UDF, they were going to use an Otis Elevator motor controller because the power consumption was so enormous to swing those blades.

J. Starwind ✝️ 🇺🇸 🇵🇷's profile picture
J. Starwind ✝️ 🇺🇸 🇵🇷3 months ago

I remember seeing this video in 1991.

Farido_Kimo's profile picture
Farido_Kimo3 months ago

Soon™

Jair Abrego's profile picture
Jair Abrego3 months ago

810 standard passed

Olutobi Olusesi 🎆's profile picture
Olutobi Olusesi 🎆3 months ago

That thing looks like it was built in a garage with spare parts and pure optimism 😂

William Hutchins's profile picture
William Hutchins3 months ago

Plans were in the works to us active noise cancellation in the cab, similar to the Saab 340 at the time if things had progressed further.

HWausKo's profile picture
HWausKo3 months ago

I want the Antonov An-180!

Pedro's profile picture
Pedro3 months ago

CBA-123

Reid Farmer (TR_Farmer_archaeology)'s profile picture
Reid Farmer (TR_Farmer_archaeology)3 months ago

GE had an inducted fan in that era as well

Brent Shavnore's profile picture
Brent Shavnore3 months ago

🚮

Related Videos

SEXY SPEC BABY
0:23

Sensitive content

SEXY SPEC BABY

𓆩♡𓆪 GODS FAVORITE 𓆩♡𓆪

298,975 views • 7 months ago