Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

"Poverty Spec" MD-80.

373,282 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 33

Фото профиля Paul
Paul3 месяцев назад

Looks like a ghetto Tupolev

Фото профиля Bernoulli's Ghost
Bernoulli's Ghost3 месяцев назад

Sweet plane mate, yeah i got the Turbo..... Prop.... The what ?!!!!

Фото профиля Chris DeRosier
Chris DeRosier3 месяцев назад

The Kuznetsov NK-12 turboprop engines on the Russian Bear bomber pretty much establishes that contra rotating turboprops exceed the noise tolerance level of the human ear. 🙄🤪

Фото профиля DarkAdapted
DarkAdapted3 месяцев назад

1980s era testbed for Unducted Fan (UDF). Didn’t work out at the time. Too loud, concerns about fan breakage. Fuel savings UDFs could update achieve were achieved with other means. Most of those other means (winglets, lower drag wings, higher bypass shrouded turbofans) have been maxed out, so we’re circling back to UDFs again. UDFs are likely making a comeback, but with some changes. The model shown above has 2 contrarotating fans, more modern versions have a row of stators and one fan (quieter). Fan blades are composite now so a blade separation is a bit less dangerous. Better blade design keeps the tips subsonic. Seems crazy but the easiest path to increased fuel efficiency is higher bypass, and there is a declining gain between increasing fan size and increasing nacelle weight and drag.

Фото профиля Ronster
Ronster3 месяцев назад

I understand the concept, but it doesn't sound right haha

Фото профиля Gotsumpnferya
Gotsumpnferya3 месяцев назад

UDFs might be coming back.

Фото профиля John Dawson
John Dawson3 месяцев назад

Saw that fly at Farnborough in 88. Interesting to watch. Bit noisy though.

Фото профиля Mo Fin ✝️🇲🇨🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇯🇲🇻🇨🇵🇳🇪🇺🏝
Mo Fin ✝️🇲🇨🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇯🇲🇻🇨🇵🇳🇪🇺🏝3 месяцев назад

That's an Unducted Fan or Propfan. In the 80s they were thought to be the coming thing, but they proved too noisy and not much more economic.

Фото профиля Burrem
Burrem3 месяцев назад

I wonder why turboprops isn't used more in short commercial flights, especially now when we need to conserve fuel and become less reliant on dictatorial oil countries and a U.S.A that seems to go hi-wire.

Фото профиля Matrix citizen
Matrix citizen3 месяцев назад

Imagine the blade breaking off lol.

Фото профиля Tshaw
Tshaw3 месяцев назад

Poverty spec is pretty mean for the hindsight of the oil crisis. Dang fan supremacists

Фото профиля Aristophanes Donitz
Aristophanes Donitz3 месяцев назад

At least the GE UDF didn't have a giant dildo glued on the back 😬

Фото профиля William Hutchins
William Hutchins3 месяцев назад

Hey That is a Pratt/Allison/Ham Standard affiliation, Those are Hamilton Standard Counter Rotating props. The System was 40% more fuel efficient that the best Gas Turbine. Why did it die? The price of Fuel dropped like a rock. I came to Ham Standard in 1988 tail end of program.

Фото профиля Democracy’s
Democracy’s3 месяцев назад

Did I see an up-and-coming new passenger jet with two of these type configurations? Imagine an A320 but with these two (and ginormous) on the wings instead of current configuration. Wild, or maybe I was hallucinating 🤪

Фото профиля MarketWatcher
MarketWatcher3 месяцев назад

The vibration from the blade tips would induce early fatigue cracking, especially in the plug

Фото профиля 🅷🆃 🅱🆄🅻🅻🅸🅾🅽 Chief Disruptor🥩🩸🪙⚛️🇺🇸✈️
🅷🆃 🅱🆄🅻🅻🅸🅾🅽 Chief Disruptor🥩🩸🪙⚛️🇺🇸✈️3 месяцев назад

It was loud and slow…

Фото профиля Alejandro Brickman
Alejandro Brickman3 месяцев назад

MD-80s in that poverty spec always looked like they skipped every optional extra from day one.

Фото профиля J Birch🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
J Birch🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸3 месяцев назад

Probably quiet 😁

Фото профиля Modern Art Masterpiece
Modern Art Masterpiece3 месяцев назад

Was that just a single engine? 😱

Фото профиля William Hutchins
William Hutchins3 месяцев назад

There were a few issues that had to be ironed out, the slip rings to provide power to the props were wet, lubricated by engine oil (intentional or unintentional I don't recall) but the graphite was making a slurry cutting through the seals, it was slated to be fixed the poof end.

Фото профиля Warden Cliff 🇰🇪🇬🇧
Warden Cliff 🇰🇪🇬🇧3 месяцев назад

Hmm. Not a fan.

Фото профиля William Hutchins
William Hutchins3 месяцев назад

Fun Fact, Pratt and Witless engineering objected to Ham Standard putting their logo on the side of the engine, that's why everyone thought it was a Pratt system it was not...Uncle Hammy made the Fan! The Barrels were massive Forgings and were machined in CT at Sterling I believe.

Фото профиля Norman J. Korkorski
Norman J. Korkorski3 месяцев назад

Temu MD-80

Фото профиля William Hutchins
William Hutchins3 месяцев назад

Fun Fact Ham Standard and Sumitomo Heavy industries made components to create a hydraulic actuated UDF, and an Electric UDF, they were going to use an Otis Elevator motor controller because the power consumption was so enormous to swing those blades.

Фото профиля J. Starwind ✝️ 🇺🇸 🇵🇷
J. Starwind ✝️ 🇺🇸 🇵🇷3 месяцев назад

I remember seeing this video in 1991.

Фото профиля Farido_Kimo
Farido_Kimo3 месяцев назад

Soon™

Фото профиля Jair Abrego
Jair Abrego3 месяцев назад

810 standard passed

Фото профиля Olutobi Olusesi 🎆
Olutobi Olusesi 🎆3 месяцев назад

That thing looks like it was built in a garage with spare parts and pure optimism 😂

Фото профиля William Hutchins
William Hutchins3 месяцев назад

Plans were in the works to us active noise cancellation in the cab, similar to the Saab 340 at the time if things had progressed further.

Фото профиля HWausKo
HWausKo3 месяцев назад

I want the Antonov An-180!

Фото профиля Pedro
Pedro3 месяцев назад

CBA-123

Фото профиля Reid Farmer (TR_Farmer_archaeology)
Reid Farmer (TR_Farmer_archaeology)3 месяцев назад

GE had an inducted fan in that era as well

Фото профиля Brent Shavnore
Brent Shavnore3 месяцев назад

🚮

Похожие видео