Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Pre Detonator Test only ( fully assembled feasibility check ). A real estate company Aiming for 5KN thrust for mach 4 - 5 speed !🙃 TRL 5 achieved and the official data will be out soon⚡️fully self funded project!! This is not an airbreathing engine #aerospace #india #defense

23,748 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

😓 Air India 🇮🇳 Flight AI171 with fully loaded Boeing 787-7 Dreamliner fatal accident: I‘m an airline pilot with >15‘000h of experience and a physics institute: My brief PRELIMINARY analysis of the visible facts from the video of the takeoff: * The flaps are only slightly extended, presumably to position 1 instead of 5. * The landing gear is still extended, which should have been retracted at this altitude and causes additional drag. * The aircraft is at a high angle of attack, which confirms the insufficient flap setting. * From the video and witness accounts, only low engine noise is audible. * Neither smoke nor fire is visible. * An engine failure is less likely. The most probable cause is presumably a human factor, an incorrectly chosen, insufficient flap setting for takeoff, and consequently an inadequately selected thrust. In this context, the correlated speeds were too low because they were calculated for a larger flap setting or a lighter aircraft. As a result, the aircraft took off with insufficient speed and intentionally but falsely derated thrust, was therefore on the unstable side, and rapidly lost more speed and altitude due to the additional failure to retract the landing gear in a timely manner, leading to a subsequent stall at low altitude and crash. For the experts: the aircraft got onto the wrong side of the speed vs drag curve and maneuvered itself into a corner from where there is no escape. Another possible cause could also have been an incorrect input of a wrong takeoff weight into the Flight Management System, resulting in too low thrust and too low speeds. The pilots got startled after takeoff, couldn’t wrap their head around what went wrong and incorrectly prioritized making an emergency call instead of flying the aircraft first, manually increasing thrust immediately to maximum, and retracting the landing gear. In summary of this very early and preliminary assessment (your confidence level should be as low as mine): The most probable cause is human error 😓 - as most of the time these days. Not because the pilots got worse (although that effect can be observed as well with prioritization of diversity over competence) - but because technology got so much better.

Iven‘s Dad

2,786,927 просмотров • 1 год назад

ISRAEL'S ARROW MISSILE ENGINE FACTORY JUST EXPLODED. WHAT HAPPENS NOW THAT THE "CONTROLLED TEST" STORY DOESN'T ADD UP? Here's what comes next, step by step: 🔴 Step 1 — The official story collapses under three facts Tomer Company called it a pre-planned test "carried out according to plan." But controlled detonations require advance public notification. There was none. Emergency services scrambled immediately. You don't do that for something planned. And the blast scale matches one thing: solid rocket propellant igniting unexpectedly. 🔴 Step 2 — Understand what Tomer actually is This is not a warehouse. This is not a factory making spare parts. Tomer is the state-owned firm that builds the rocket engines for Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 — Israel's primary shield against Iranian ballistic missiles. No Tomer engines. No Arrow interceptors. No missile defense. 🔴 Step 3 — Understand what Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 actually do Arrow 3 intercepts ballistic missiles above the atmosphere. Arrow 2 handles mid-altitude threats inside the atmosphere. Together they form the top two layers of Israel's defense against exactly the kind of missiles Iran has been firing. Tomer builds the propulsion that makes both of them fly. 🔴 Step 4 — Consider the timing Iran just escalated on its own terms for the first time — not in response to U.S. action, but initiating. A more emboldened Iran than the one that entered the ceasefire. And at this exact moment, a massive explosion hits the facility that manufactures Israel's defense against Iranian missiles. 🔴 Step 5 — If this was an accident A production or testing mishap during propellant handling is the most probable explanation. A similar blast at the same Tomer site happened in 2021 — also called a controlled test afterward. Industrial accidents at rocket propellant facilities are rare but catastrophic when they occur. The damage to production timelines could be significant at a moment when Israel needs interceptors most. 🔴 Step 6 — If this was NOT an accident Sabotage at exactly this target, at exactly this moment, cannot be fully ruled out. Iran has demonstrated the capability and the motive to reach inside Israel's defense infrastructure. Disrupting Arrow engine production doesn't require a missile strike — it requires one person in the right place. Israel's missile defense capacity would degrade quietly, invisibly, before the next war begins. 🔴 Step 7 — Either answer is a serious problem Accident: Israel's most critical missile defense supply chain just took a hit during active conflict. Sabotage: Iran may have just struck Israel's shield without firing a single missile. Both outcomes serve the same strategic objective — leaving Israel less capable of defending against the next ballistic missile barrage. The question is not whether this matters. The question is which answer is worse. Are you positioned for what comes next? I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨

🇨🇳 Guo Shen 郭深

372,041 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад