Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

PREDICTION: When Jack Smith is finally held accountable for lying to congress about not collecting the content of text for 44 members of Congress he'll simply claim that he didn't know his team was reading the texts. He thought they just collected metadata. At the end of the day,...

amuse's profile picture

@amuse

687,179 subscribers

20,954 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Sen. Chuck Grassley has just received evidence that Special Counsel Jack Smith possibly LIED TO CONGRESS UNDER OATH when he said his team did not request the content of text messages of GOP members of Congress Smith said: "No" But Grassley just got DOJ records confirming "Jack Smith's investigative team reviewed the contents of text messages sent by 44 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. I'm 1 of the 44." GRASSLEY: "I'm alerting my colleagues who were impacted and will release the records with Sen. Johnson so [the] American people can see the evidence." JACK SMITH MUST FACE JUSTICE!
0:10

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Sen. Chuck Grassley has just received evidence that Special Counsel Jack Smith possibly LIED TO CONGRESS UNDER OATH when he said his team did not request the content of text messages of GOP members of Congress Smith said: "No" But Grassley just got DOJ records confirming "Jack Smith's investigative team reviewed the contents of text messages sent by 44 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. I'm 1 of the 44." GRASSLEY: "I'm alerting my colleagues who were impacted and will release the records with Sen. Johnson so [the] American people can see the evidence." JACK SMITH MUST FACE JUSTICE!

Eric Daugherty

205,282 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 JUST IN: Special Counsel Jack Smith is facing mass calls to be PROSECUTED, Sen. Josh Hawley says he likely committed PERJURY after it was exposed Smith's team spied on text messages from GOP members of Congress This is despite UNDER OATH, Smith testifying "no" — he did not request the content of text messages in his investigation. HAWLEY: "Looks like perjury." 💯 "Joe Biden’s DOJ not only tapped my phone; I just learned they ILLEGALLY obtained my texts with members of President Trump’s administration. Everyone involved needs to be PROSECUTED." Not just Smith — HIS WHOLE TEAM! Bring on the charges! Josh Hawley
0:10

🚨 JUST IN: Special Counsel Jack Smith is facing mass calls to be PROSECUTED, Sen. Josh Hawley says he likely committed PERJURY after it was exposed Smith's team spied on text messages from GOP members of Congress This is despite UNDER OATH, Smith testifying "no" — he did not request the content of text messages in his investigation. HAWLEY: "Looks like perjury." 💯 "Joe Biden’s DOJ not only tapped my phone; I just learned they ILLEGALLY obtained my texts with members of President Trump’s administration. Everyone involved needs to be PROSECUTED." Not just Smith — HIS WHOLE TEAM! Bring on the charges! Josh Hawley

Eric Daugherty

184,037 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

BREAKING: The Trump DOJ just launched an Investigation into Special Counsel Jack Smith, claiming he lied to congress. Here's what he was asked and his answer: Q: "Did the toll records that you requested from the senators include the content of the phone calls?" Smith: "No." FACT: The toll records did NOT include the content of the phone calls. Therefore Jack Smith told the truth, and this is yet another form of Trump's weaponized DOJ, going after the good guys to try and make himself look less bad.
0:11

BREAKING: The Trump DOJ just launched an Investigation into Special Counsel Jack Smith, claiming he lied to congress. Here's what he was asked and his answer: Q: "Did the toll records that you requested from the senators include the content of the phone calls?" Smith: "No." FACT: The toll records did NOT include the content of the phone calls. Therefore Jack Smith told the truth, and this is yet another form of Trump's weaponized DOJ, going after the good guys to try and make himself look less bad.

Brian Krassenstein

150,999 просмотров • 22 дней назад

On Wednesday, Brandon Johnson was asked whether he is running for re-election. He said: “Why are you mad at me for doing what the people of Chicago elected me to do? I’ve kept every single promise. I have not lied to the people of Chicago.” Did Mayor Johnson just lie when he said that? Do you feel he has lied to the people of Chicago? Do you feel he had a mandate for his progressive agenda when Chicago voter turnout was about 35%, and he was elected with roughly 18% of the vote—or just over 50% of those who voted?
0:17

On Wednesday, Brandon Johnson was asked whether he is running for re-election. He said: “Why are you mad at me for doing what the people of Chicago elected me to do? I’ve kept every single promise. I have not lied to the people of Chicago.” Did Mayor Johnson just lie when he said that? Do you feel he has lied to the people of Chicago? Do you feel he had a mandate for his progressive agenda when Chicago voter turnout was about 35%, and he was elected with roughly 18% of the vote—or just over 50% of those who voted?

Reporter William J. Kelly #thatreporter

76,738 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Regarding the Eric Trump / Daniel Cormier “text scandal”, I am open to being convinced otherwise, but I do not believe for one second that Eric Trump would text something so stupid to Daniel Cormier. It’s laughably stupid on its face to think that Eric Trump would ask a UFC commentator if any of the fights are “rigged”. That he would ask it in writing. And that he would not, for example, just pick up the phone and call Dana White or Joe Rogan himself. That said, I just want to understand what happened. Daniel Cormier said he was hacked. Is that to say he was hacked at the text level, or the X post level? Did he in fact make the post, and delete it? If he made the post, did he do it as a joke to illustrate how absurd the text hack was, but realized how the post could be misinterpreted as real? Or did someone make the post from his X account he subsequently deleted it. I know there are some who are going to say he made the post in earnest, thinking the text messages were real, intending to call out the “corruption”, and he has since been threatened, deleted the post, and claimed “hack”, etc. I can tell you exactly why I do not believe, even if he made the post, he did it believing the text message was real, intending to call out the “corruption”. If Cormier seriously thought the text messages were real, he would understand that by posting it publicly, it would literally destroy the UFC, his livelihood and his legacy - in addition to the legacy of everyone who has ever competed in the UFC. There is no realm of the universe in which even if it were in fact a real text that he actually received from Eric Trump, he would post it publicly. Because it would mean the end of the UFC. I just want to know if he actually made the post from his X account, or if the entire post was the result of a hack (hence the subsequent deleting of the post). Serious and sincere questions for clarity that would benefit everyone Eric Trump
0:16

Regarding the Eric Trump / Daniel Cormier “text scandal”, I am open to being convinced otherwise, but I do not believe for one second that Eric Trump would text something so stupid to Daniel Cormier. It’s laughably stupid on its face to think that Eric Trump would ask a UFC commentator if any of the fights are “rigged”. That he would ask it in writing. And that he would not, for example, just pick up the phone and call Dana White or Joe Rogan himself. That said, I just want to understand what happened. Daniel Cormier said he was hacked. Is that to say he was hacked at the text level, or the X post level? Did he in fact make the post, and delete it? If he made the post, did he do it as a joke to illustrate how absurd the text hack was, but realized how the post could be misinterpreted as real? Or did someone make the post from his X account he subsequently deleted it. I know there are some who are going to say he made the post in earnest, thinking the text messages were real, intending to call out the “corruption”, and he has since been threatened, deleted the post, and claimed “hack”, etc. I can tell you exactly why I do not believe, even if he made the post, he did it believing the text message was real, intending to call out the “corruption”. If Cormier seriously thought the text messages were real, he would understand that by posting it publicly, it would literally destroy the UFC, his livelihood and his legacy - in addition to the legacy of everyone who has ever competed in the UFC. There is no realm of the universe in which even if it were in fact a real text that he actually received from Eric Trump, he would post it publicly. Because it would mean the end of the UFC. I just want to know if he actually made the post from his X account, or if the entire post was the result of a hack (hence the subsequent deleting of the post). Serious and sincere questions for clarity that would benefit everyone Eric Trump

Viva Frei

30,167 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Meet B K Hariprasad, the new Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee President and a known Pakistan apologist. Far from being held accountable for his remarks, he has been rewarded with the top post in the Karnataka Congress. Now that he occupies a position of such responsibility, the people of Karnataka deserve a clear answer: Does B K Hariprasad still believe that Pakistan is a friendly country? Silence is not an option. The Congress party must clarify whether his views reflect its own.
0:19

Meet B K Hariprasad, the new Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee President and a known Pakistan apologist. Far from being held accountable for his remarks, he has been rewarded with the top post in the Karnataka Congress. Now that he occupies a position of such responsibility, the people of Karnataka deserve a clear answer: Does B K Hariprasad still believe that Pakistan is a friendly country? Silence is not an option. The Congress party must clarify whether his views reflect its own.

Amit Malviya

40,131 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

He is Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas. • He is the father of Umar Khalid. • He has reached the CJP protest site at Jantar Mantar. • He was a founding member of SIMI. • He served as the National President of SIMI. • SIMI was declared a terrorist organisation by the Congress government. • SIMI was responsible for the Mumbai and Delhi blasts.
0:16

He is Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas. • He is the father of Umar Khalid. • He has reached the CJP protest site at Jantar Mantar. • He was a founding member of SIMI. • He served as the National President of SIMI. • SIMI was declared a terrorist organisation by the Congress government. • SIMI was responsible for the Mumbai and Delhi blasts.

Facts

87,987 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Francisco Lindor says he talked to Carlos Mendoza after his departure as Mets manager: "He apologized for not helping us win as much, but at the end of the day, this is not on him. It's more on us, the players, that we didn't perform to our capabilities."
0:19

Francisco Lindor says he talked to Carlos Mendoza after his departure as Mets manager: "He apologized for not helping us win as much, but at the end of the day, this is not on him. It's more on us, the players, that we didn't perform to our capabilities."

SNY

41,163 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This video reminds me of my guy and his girlfriend When she came to hishouse for the first time, he asked if she was afraid, she said yes At the end of the day he was shocked, he couldn't believe his eyes 😭 Odi, He say she was just turning for different styles 😭😂😂
0:14

This video reminds me of my guy and his girlfriend When she came to hishouse for the first time, he asked if she was afraid, she said yes At the end of the day he was shocked, he couldn't believe his eyes 😭 Odi, He say she was just turning for different styles 😭😂😂

𝑳𝒖𝒄𝒌𝒚 𝑰𝒃.

154,266 просмотров • 9 дней назад

Jack is 20 years old with no signs of slowing down. He now has a problematic ankle that we are sparing no expense on keeping him comfortable on. Not for our use but because he does not handle life at the farm well. He is happiest with a purpose and just being around the barn. I have had him in my life since he was a yearling and owned him since he was 3. It is not a thought I want to have that he is getting up there in age.
0:12

Jack is 20 years old with no signs of slowing down. He now has a problematic ankle that we are sparing no expense on keeping him comfortable on. Not for our use but because he does not handle life at the farm well. He is happiest with a purpose and just being around the barn. I have had him in my life since he was a yearling and owned him since he was 3. It is not a thought I want to have that he is getting up there in age.

Cherie DeVaux

22,570 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Lindsey Graham LIED and said FISA could only be used on Americans if the Feds had a warrant. He advocated for the extension of FISA. Now that he’s been spied on (not FISA related) by Jack Smith, he wants justice for himself.
0:11

Lindsey Graham LIED and said FISA could only be used on Americans if the Feds had a warrant. He advocated for the extension of FISA. Now that he’s been spied on (not FISA related) by Jack Smith, he wants justice for himself.

Breanna Morello

117,194 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Was Keir Starmer responsible for the decision NOT to prosecute Jimmy Saville? Keir Starmer was head of the CPS when the decision was taken not to prosecute Saville in 2009 but the decision was taken by a local CPS lawyer who decided there was not enough evidence to proceed. So he maintained it was not his decision. He later apologised after a review in 2011 (once Saville died & it all came out) for the CPS shortcomings but maintained he was not personally involved. At the end of the day the buck stops at the top & HE WAS THE HEAD OF THE CPS, so he has to take responsibility. In the video below he says: “I take full responsibility for every decision of the Crown Prosecution Service while I was Director of Public Prosecutions.” There you have it straight from the horse’s mouth. YES he was responsible for the failure to prosecute Britains most notorious & prolific child sex offender.
0:11

Was Keir Starmer responsible for the decision NOT to prosecute Jimmy Saville? Keir Starmer was head of the CPS when the decision was taken not to prosecute Saville in 2009 but the decision was taken by a local CPS lawyer who decided there was not enough evidence to proceed. So he maintained it was not his decision. He later apologised after a review in 2011 (once Saville died & it all came out) for the CPS shortcomings but maintained he was not personally involved. At the end of the day the buck stops at the top & HE WAS THE HEAD OF THE CPS, so he has to take responsibility. In the video below he says: “I take full responsibility for every decision of the Crown Prosecution Service while I was Director of Public Prosecutions.” There you have it straight from the horse’s mouth. YES he was responsible for the failure to prosecute Britains most notorious & prolific child sex offender.

J Stewart

270,426 просмотров • 1 год назад

This was the luckiest day of his life. If not for that, he would've regretted everything.
0:15

This was the luckiest day of his life. If not for that, he would've regretted everything.

Buddy Jnr💚🩺💉

4,180,137 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Trump: “We’ve gotten everything passed that we need for four years.” Yes, that’s right. You are struggling to pay for housing, health care, and utilities. But Trump thinks his tax cuts for the rich at the expense of everyday Americans is all he needed Congress to do.
0:19

Trump: “We’ve gotten everything passed that we need for four years.” Yes, that’s right. You are struggling to pay for housing, health care, and utilities. But Trump thinks his tax cuts for the rich at the expense of everyday Americans is all he needed Congress to do.

James E. Clyburn

32,818 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

It took Merrick Garland three weeks to indict Steve Bannon after he was held in contempt of Congress. Hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress. Indict both of them. It’s not about right or left. No one is above the law. 😝
0:14

It took Merrick Garland three weeks to indict Steve Bannon after he was held in contempt of Congress. Hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress. Indict both of them. It’s not about right or left. No one is above the law. 😝

Viva Frei

304,606 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Leavitt: "To suggest and encourage that active duty service members defy the chain of command is a very dangerous thing for sitting members of Congress to do. And they should be held accountable. And that's what the president wants to see."
0:11

Leavitt: "To suggest and encourage that active duty service members defy the chain of command is a very dangerous thing for sitting members of Congress to do. And they should be held accountable. And that's what the president wants to see."

Aaron Rupar

35,898 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

On June 1st, Romeo was arriving at work when he was wrongfully taken by ICE. They did not ask his name, did not provide any documentation, and would not give information as to why he was being arrested. According to one of the ICE workers, after the fact, he was not who they were looking for, and despite his having no criminal history, he is still being detained somewhere. The GoFundMe is to help his family be able to afford a lawyer so that he can get the legal help that he deserves and needs. 👉
0:17

On June 1st, Romeo was arriving at work when he was wrongfully taken by ICE. They did not ask his name, did not provide any documentation, and would not give information as to why he was being arrested. According to one of the ICE workers, after the fact, he was not who they were looking for, and despite his having no criminal history, he is still being detained somewhere. The GoFundMe is to help his family be able to afford a lawyer so that he can get the legal help that he deserves and needs. 👉

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

95,749 просмотров • 1 год назад

Jack Nicholson in Batman (1989). 🥶 Jack Nicholson loved his performance in this film so much that at one point, he was watching the film once a week at his house. Jack Nicholson said of his role, "The thing I like about the Joker is that his sense of humor is completely tasteless." He later said The Joker was one of his favorite roles he played.
0:15

Jack Nicholson in Batman (1989). 🥶 Jack Nicholson loved his performance in this film so much that at one point, he was watching the film once a week at his house. Jack Nicholson said of his role, "The thing I like about the Joker is that his sense of humor is completely tasteless." He later said The Joker was one of his favorite roles he played.

Love Classical Music and Movies 🎺🎻💖🎥🎬

576,753 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад